COLEBROOKDALE TOWNSHIP PIKE TOWNSHIP Berks County, Pennsylvania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

COLEBROOKDALE TOWNSHIP PIKE TOWNSHIP Berks County, Pennsylvania , , , ,- . .... .. .. >, . .._. .. -. ' ,.,.I . .. ', . r. .., . .. I. .. --. .. THE -. '. BOYERTOWN BOROUGH COLEBROOKDALE TOWNSHIP PIKE TOWNSHIP Berks County, Pennsylvania e JOINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2005 Adopted by Boyertown Borough March 7,2005 Adopted by Colebrookdale Township March 7,2005 _. Adopted by Pike Township on March 1,2005 -_ Consultant Urban Research & Development Corporation -1 Bethlehem, Pennsylvania .. BOYERTOWN BOROUGH COLEBROOKDALE TOWNSHIP PIKE TOWNSHIP JOINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Boyertown Borough . Jane Crowe, Borough Council Frank Deery, Borough Council Paticia A. Spaide, Borough Manager Colebrookdale Townshie Thomas Herb, Township Commissioner John Lea, Zoning Hearing Board Pike Township Jeffery E. Gorrin, Township Supervisor Steffan R. Helbig, P.G., Township Supervisor Gary M. Reider, Township Supervisor Berks County Planning Commission Scott Wales, Planner Bovertown Area School District Dr. Charles Amuso, Superintendent :. CONTENTS .. PAGE .. INTRODUCTION ............................................................. 1 Thevision ............................................................. 1 ThePlan ..............................................................2 BACKGROUNDREPORTS .................................................... 3 Regionalsetting ....................................................... 3 ... Historical Highlights .................................................... 5 Population, Housing and Employment ...................................... 9 NaturalFeatures ....................................................... 17 .. Existing Land Use ..................................................... 33 LocalGovemment ..................................................... 43 Parks and Recreation ................................................... 45 ... PublicSchools ........................................................ 49 Community Facilities and Services ......................................... 53 Land Use Policies In the Region .......................................... 61 .. Transportation ........................................................ 66 Borough Revitalization ................................................. 71 Summary of Assets and Limitations ....................................... 72 .. THE PLAN FOR THE FUTURE ................................................ 75 .. Goals and Objectives ...................................................75 Plan Interrelationships .................................................. 77 Timing .............................. ; ......... :..................... 78 .. Future Land Use and Housing ............................................ 78 Environmental Conservation ............................................. 95 .. Agricultural Preservation ............................................... 101 .. Historic Preservation .................................................. 104 Borough Revitalization ................................................ 105 Transportation ....................................................... 110 Community Services and Facilities ....................................... 113 Energy Conservation .................................................. 116 THEACTIONPROGRAM .................................................. 117 SummaryofRecommendations .......................................... 117 Implementing This Comprehensive Plan .................................. 121 Fundingsources ..................................................... 126 APPENDIX Public Participation .................................................. A- 1 II CONTENTS (Cont.) II. PAGE . Maps and Other Graphics RegionalLocation' ............................................................... 4 I-: Historic Sites Map and Additional Sites List (following map) ............................. 7 PhysiographicSections .......................................................... 17 Steepslopes ................................................................... 23 I-: WaterFeatures ................................................................. 25 Woodlands .................................................................... 27 PNDISites ..................................................................... 29 I Soils ......................................................................... 31 Agricultural Features ............................................................. 37 Existing Land Use ............................................ : ................. 39 Existing Land Use, Boyertown Enlargement .......................................... 41 r' Recreation Sites and Public Schools ................................................. 51 Public Sewer and Water Service Areas .............................................. 55 Soil Suitability for Septic Systems ................................................. 57 1 Adjacentzoning ................................................................ 63 Trafficvolume ................................................................. 69 FutureLandUse ................................................................ 85 1 Future Land Use Plan, Boyertown Enlargement ........................................ 87 Open Space vs . Conventional Subdivision Design ..................................... 92 Suburban vs . Neotraditional Design ................................................ 93 I .i Traditional Neighborhood Development ............................................. 94 The Pennsylvania Highlands ...................................................... 96 Streetscape Improvement Concept - Route 73 Looking West ............................. 108 1- Streetscape Improvement Concept - Route 562 Looking North .......................... 109 -! Tables I; 1 . Total Population. 1960-2000 ............................................... 9 -.i 2 . Total Population. 1990-2000 .............................................. 10 3 Population Density. 1990-2000 ............................................. 10 . I_ 4 Total Population. Adjacent Municipalities and Berks County. 1960-2000 ............ 11 .. 5 Age Distribution. 2000 ................................................... 12 6 . Average Person Per Household. 1990-2000 ................................... 12 1.1 7 . HousingType. 2000 ..................................................... 13 8 . Housing Tenure and Vacancy, 2000 ........................................ 14 9 . Housing Value, 2000 ..................................................... 14 1-: 10 . Median Income and Poverty, 2000 .......................................... 15 11 . Median Income and Poverty, Adjacent Municipalities, 2000 ..................... 15 . 12 Top Ten Employers in Berks County, 2003 ................................... 16 I-. 13 . Streams with Protected Use Designations, 2004 ............................... 19 14 . Operating Fund Revenues, 2004 ........................................... 44 ... 15 . Operating Fund Expenditures, 2004 ......................................... 44 . I-., 16 . Boyertown Area School District Enrollments, 2004 ............................ 49 17 . Zoning Adjacent to the Boyertown - Colebrookdale - Pike Area .................. 61 18 . Summary of Recommended Future Land Use Planning Areas .................... 89 19 . Guidelines for Protecting Important Natural Features ........................... 97 1-1 20 . Highway Functional Classifications and Recommended Design Features .......... 112 21 . SummaryofRecommendations ........................................... 117 .. 22 . Fundingsources ....................................................... 126 1. I .. -. .. .: . INTRODUCTION Introduction INTRODUCTION The Vision TheB~yerto~Boreu~~~leb~ookdale~crwlnship---Eike~o~nshi~~~~~p~ehe~i~~l~is----- ____ a locally-generated vision for the fbture of a unique area. The plan shows how the region can grow in selected, appropriate locations while still preserving open space and conserving its best features-both natural and man-made. Growth in the Boyertown-Colebrookdale-Pike region should be concentrated in and around existing . -. developed areas. In Boyertown, community revitalization and adaptive reuse should be the corner- stone of both residential and business growth. In Colebrookdale, most growth should occur in _. locations near Boyertown and close to existing public water and sewer facilities. In the more rural .. parts of Colebrookdale and in Pike, farmlands should be preserved for agriculture to the greatest extent possible. In these areas, permanent open space should be a prominent feature of all major _' subdivisions and land developments. The vital environmental functions and physical limitations of .. steep slopes, woodlands, floodprone lands and other natural areas in these two townships should also .. be respected. -. New homes in the region should be sited on the most suitable portions of a tract of land. Open space .. preservation within new developments should be maximized. Public facilities should be engineered to maintain public health and protect local water quality without spurring unplanned growth. .._._, .. New commerce and industry in the region must be well planned, environmentally safe and properly located. Where feasible, businesses along major roads should use common entrances and exits to 1- ' improve traffic safety/circulation and help prevent commercial strip development. In both residential I I. and non-residential areas, people should exercise care in maintaining and reusing historic structures. Commercial signs and landscaping should complement,
Recommended publications
  • Water Resources of Oley Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania Were Studied by the U.S
    WATER RESOURCES OF OLEY TOWNSHIP, BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA By Gary N. Paulachok and Charles R. Wood U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 87-4065 Prepared in cooperation with the OLEY TOWNSHIP SUPERVISORS Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 1988 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 4th Floor, Federal Building Federal Center P.O. Box 1107 Box 25425 Harrisburg, PA 17108-1107 Denver, Colorado 80225 ii CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................................ 1 Introduction............................................................ 2 Purpose and scope................................................... 2 Description of area................................................. 2 Physical and cultural setting.................................. 2 Climate and precipitation...................................... 4 Geologic setting............................................... 5 Water supply and wastewater treatment............................... 6 We11-numbering system............................................... 7 Geologic names and aquifer codes.................................... 7 Acknowledgments..................................................... 8 Surface-water resources................................................. 8 Drainage basins and streamflow.....................................
    [Show full text]
  • County PSD Code Municipality School District Name
    County Municipality School District Name Municipal Total Nonresident Resident EIT PSD Code EIT (percent) (percent) ADAMS 010201 ABBOTTSTOWN BORO CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 0 1.5 ADAMS 010601 ARENDTSVILLE BORO UPPER ADAMS S D 0 1.6 ADAMS 010602 BENDERSVILLE BORO UPPER ADAMS S D 0 1.6 ADAMS 010202 BERWICK TWP CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 0 1.5 ADAMS 010603 BIGLERVILLE BORO UPPER ADAMS S D 0.5 1.6 ADAMS 010203 BONNEAUVILLE BORO CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 0 1.5 ADAMS 010501 BONNEAUVILLE BORO LITTLESTOWN AREA S D 0 1 ADAMS 010604 BUTLER TWP UPPER ADAMS S D 0 1.6 ADAMS 010301 CARROLL VALLEY BORO FAIRFIELD AREA S D 0.5 1.5 ADAMS 010204 CONEWAGO TWP CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 0 1.5 ADAMS 010401 CUMBERLAND TWP GETTYSBURG AREA S D 1 1.7 ADAMS 010101 EAST BERLIN BORO BERMUDIAN SPRINGS S D 0 1.7 ADAMS 010302 FAIRFIELD BORO FAIRFIELD AREA S D 0 1.5 ADAMS 010402 FRANKLIN TWP GETTYSBURG AREA S D 0 1.7 ADAMS 010403 FREEDOM TWP GETTYSBURG AREA S D 0 1.7 ADAMS 010502 GERMANY TWP LITTLESTOWN AREA S D 0 1 ADAMS 010404 GETTYSBURG BORO GETTYSBURG AREA S D 0 1.7 ADAMS 010102 HAMILTON TWP BERMUDIAN SPRINGS S D 0 1.7 ADAMS 010205 HAMILTON TWP CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 0 1.5 ADAMS 010303 HAMILTONBAN TWP FAIRFIELD AREA S D 0 1.5 ADAMS 010405 HIGHLAND TWP GETTYSBURG AREA S D 0 1.7 ADAMS 010103 HUNTINGTON TWP BERMUDIAN SPRINGS S D 0 1.7 ADAMS 010104 LATIMORE TWP BERMUDIAN SPRINGS S D 0.5 1.7 ADAMS 010304 LIBERTY TWP FAIRFIELD AREA S D 0 1.5 ADAMS 010503 LITTLESTOWN BORO LITTLESTOWN AREA S D 0.5 1 ADAMS 010206 MCSHERRYSTOWN BORO CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 0 1.5 ADAMS 010605 MENALLEN TWP UPPER ADAMS S D 0 1.6
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster Plain, C. 1730-1960
    Agricultural Resources of Pennsylvania, c. 1700-1960 Lancaster Plain, c. 1730-1960 2 Lancaster Plain, 1730-1960 Table of Contents Lancaster Plain Historic Agricultural Region, c. 1730-1960....................................................... 4 Location ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Climate, Soils, and Topography................................................................................................ 10 Historical Farming Systems ...................................................................................................... 12 Diverse Production for Diverse Uses, c. 1730 to about 1780 ............................................... 12 Products, c 1730-1780 ...................................................................................................... 12 Labor and Land Tenure, 1730-1780 ................................................................................. 16 Buildings and Landscapes, 1730-1780 ............................................................................. 17 Farm House, 1730-1780................................................................................................ 17 Ancillary houses, 1730-1780 ........................................................................................ 19 Barns, 1730-1780 .......................................................................................................... 19 Outbuildings, c 1730-1780: .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oley Valley School District Berks County, Pennsylvania ______
    PERFORMANCE AUDIT ____________ Oley Valley School District Berks County, Pennsylvania ____________ January 2016 Dr. Tracy S. Shank, Superintendent Mr. Stephen S. Burns, Board President Oley Valley School District Oley Valley School District 17 Jefferson Street 17 Jefferson Street Oley, Pennsylvania 19547 Oley, Pennsylvania 19547 Dear Dr. Shank and Mr. Burns: We have conducted a performance audit of the Oley Valley School District (District) for the period July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2015. We evaluated the District’s performance in the following areas: · Governance · Contracting · Administrator Contract Buy-out · School Safety · Bus Driver Requirements The audit was conducted pursuant to Section 403 of The Fiscal Code, 72 P.S. § 403, and in accordance with the Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. Our audit found that the District performed adequately in the areas listed above. We appreciate the District’s cooperation during the course of the audit. Sincerely, Eugene A. DePasquale January 28, 2016 Auditor General cc: OLEY VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Board of School Directors Table of Contents Page Background Information ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PENNSYLVANIA ECONOMY LEAGUE STAFF PROFILE Charles
    PENNSYLVANIA ECONOMY LEAGUE STAFF PROFILE Charles W. Watters Senior Research Associate Central PA Division Education: B.A. - Government, King’s College (1968) M.A. - Political Science, University of Tennessee (1971) Experience with PEL: Joined PEL in 1969. Planned, organized, directed, conducted, reviewed, and/or presented a wide variety of research involving counties, municipalities, school districts, and authorities. These projects have involved budgeting; management and financial analysis; long-range financial and operational planning; productivity improvement; administrative procedures; service options; municipal merger and consolidation; government restructuring and charter drafting; rate structure analysis; personnel and labor relations; and school enrollment projections, among others. Among the jurisdictions covered by specific projects are Clinton, Dauphin, Lackawanna, Lancaster, Lehigh, Luzerne, Lycoming, Monroe, Northampton, and Schuylkill counties; Bethlehem, Harrisburg, Lebanon, Reading, Scranton, Wilkes-Barre, Williamsport, and York cities; Bristol, Edwardsville, Kingston, Mount Penn, Nazareth, Schuylkill Haven, West Pittston, Wyomis- sing, and Wyomissing Hills boroughs; the Town of Bloomsburg; Derry, Hampden, Lancaster, Muhlenberg, Plains, Salisbury, Spring, Springettsbury, Susquehanna, and York townships; and the Antietam, Avon Grove, Bellefonte Area, Blue Mountain, Boyertown Area, Brandywine Heights Area, Bristol Township, Carlisle Area, Central Bucks, Central Dauphin, Central York, Chambersburg Area, Coatesville Area,
    [Show full text]
  • Icall Them "Geographical Groups," for There Seems to Be Littleevidence
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF FORMER, NOW EXTINCT, AMISH COMMUNITIES IN PENNSYLANIA1 MAURICE A. MOOK* an earlier article in which the ten present Old Order Amish com- munities in Pennsylvania were identified and located, 2 the present Inwriter stated that "No one knows how many times the Amish have unsuccessfully attempted to establish new communities ... in the his- tory of the Commonwealth." Subsequent research at the Mennonite Publishing House Library at Scottdale, Pennsylvania, 3 has revealed evidence of more than a dozen former now-extinct Amish communities in the state. The history of one of these was considered in a previous issue of this journal.4 These unsuccessful attempts of the Amish to establish colonies in Pennsylvania range in time from the early eigh- teenth century to the present year. There are records of six attempts of the Amish to establish com- munity life in southeastern Pennsylvania during the earliest years of their settlement in America. 5 Only one of these communities survives to the present day. One of their first colonies was on the "Northkill" settlement, established inthe late 1730's near the present town of Ham- burg, in northern Berks County. This frontier community, located some distance north of other settlements in southeastern Pennsylvania, was near a gap in the Blue Mountain range. The geographical isola- tion of its location and its proximity to the break in the mountain bar- rier exposed it to the Indian raids of the frontier fringe during the French and Indian War. Also the non-resistant faith of its Amish in- habitants made it an easy victim of such attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • 7095000* Oley Valley School District
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 2017 NEW ISSUE—BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: See “RATINGS” herein In the opinion of Stevens & Lee, P.C., Reading, Pennsylvania, Bond Counsel, assuming continuing compliance by the School District with certain covenants to comply with provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and any applicable regulations thereunder, interest on the Bonds is not includable in gross income under Section 103(a) of the Code and interest on the Bonds is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal individual and corporate alternative minimum taxes, except as set forth under the heading “Tax Matters” in this Official Statement. Other provisions of the Code may affect purchasers and holders of the Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS” herein for a brief description of these provisions. Under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Bonds and interest on the Bonds shall be free from taxation for State and local purposes within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, but this exemption does not extend to gift, estate, succession or inheritance taxes or any other taxes not levied or assessed directly on the Bonds or the interest thereon. Under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, profits, gains or income derived from the sale, exchange or other disposition of the Bonds shall be subject to State and local taxation within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The School District has designated and determined under and for purposes of Section 265(b)(3)(B) of the Code to qualify each of the Bonds as a “qualified tax exempt obligation” as such phrase is defined in the Code.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NFS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Li i-j : National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing_________________________________________ ____Farms in Berks County, PA______ B. Associated Historic Contexts____________________________________________ Agriculture in Berks County: 1700-1945 C. Geographical Data Berks County, Pennsylvania I I See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. Brent DA Glass. _PA J^Histo 1 & Museum Commissio Signature of State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related.properties for listing in the National Register. Signature of the Keeper of the National Register Date/ E. Statement of Historic Contexts Discuss each historic context listed in Section B.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2020 Tin 'N Brass
    FROM: Michael Horning 4230 Dorney Park Rd. Apt. 1018 Allentown, PA 18104 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED AUGUST 2020 AUGUST “TIN ‘N BRASS” AACA ONTELAUNEE REGION FOUNDED 1965 VOLUME FIFTY FIVE ISSUE NO. EIGHT AUGUST 2020 Ontelaunee Region AACA holds monthly meetings on the first Saturday of each month, January through May and September through November, at 7:00 p.m. Meetings are held at the New Jerusalem Zion Church, Krumsville, PA. PRESIDENT 1st VICE PRESIDENT 2nd VICE PRESIDENT Robert Hobaugh Barbara Oswald Marilyn Roth 710 E Walnut St. 2095 Greenawald Ave 428 Adams Rd. Kutztown, PA 19530 Allentown, PA 18104 Breinigsville, PA 18031 610-683-3591 610-820-7191 610-395-3083 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] SECRETARY TREASURER Susan Manwiller Lester Manwiller 20 Timothy Dr. 20 Timothy Dr. Fleetwood, PA 19522 Fleetwood, PA 610-944-8619 610-944-8619 [email protected] [email protected] BOARD OF DIRECTORS Ken Dages Suzy McGovern - chairperson Tim Hinkle Mike Wolfe Don Baer Mike Horning - Tin ‘N Brass Editor Phyllis J. Peters - Membership 4230 Dorney Park Rd. Apt. 1018 5265 Elgen Dr. Allentown, PA 18104 Emmaus, PA 18049 610-755-7445 610-965-9236 [email protected] [email protected] COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSONS Budget - Lester Manwiller Registration - Susan Manwiller Hamburg Flea Market - Lester Manwiller Das Awscht Fescht - Matt Manwiller Publicity - Don Baer Activities - Suzy McGovern www.ontelaunee.aaca.com SMOKE SIGNALS August 9 Dog Days Tour 15 Wheels of Faith Car Show Whitehall, PA 15 Night in the Country Car Cruise New Tripoli, PA 20-22 AACA Southeastern Fall Nat’ls Elizabeth, Ind.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Politics in Oley Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania, 1860-64
    Liberty University The Heartland of the Democracy: Presidential Politics in Oley Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania, 1860-64 A Thesis Submitted to The Faculty of the History Department In Candidacy for the Degree of Master of History by Benjamin D. Petersheim Lynchburg, Virginia April 2014 Contents Introduction and Historiography 1 Chapter 1: Oley’s Antebellum Society and Culture 17 Chapter 2: Oley’s Democratic Roots and the 1860 Presidential Campaign 43 Chapter 3: Oley’s Wartime Partisanship and the 1864 Presidential Campaign 68 Conclusion 96 Appendices 105 Bibliography 109 Petersheim 1 Introduction and Historiography Oley Township, founded in 1740, in Berks County, Pennsylvania holds a special place in the commonwealth’s history because of its unique religious, political, and cultural history.1 With hundreds of historic buildings and its Pennsylvania German heritage, the heart of the Oley Valley continues to attract colonial and Pennsylvania German historians from great distances so that they are able to analyze and research its rich heritage. Indeed, the area was designated as a National Historic District by the National Register of Historic Places in 1983 and much of the farmland has been preserved through land trusts and historical preservation efforts. Many of the original settler’s descendants remain in Berks County and a large number of them live on or near the valley farmsteads which their ancestors built in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Unfortunately, scholars have largely overlooked Oley’s antebellum and Civil War history. Throughout that period, the township (and larger county) maintained a strong allegiance to the Democratic Party. Oley, part of the “Gibraltar of the Democracy,” steadfastly voted for Democratic presidential candidates throughout the nineteenth century, including Southern Democrat John C.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Final Thesis.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Arts and Architecture A CASE STUDY OF OVERALL HISTORIC CHARACTER AND PRESERVATION INITIATIVES: OLEY TOWNSHIP HISTORIC DISTRICT, BERKS COUNTY, PA A Thesis in Landscape Architecture by Zachary L. Pyle 2012 Zachary L. Pyle Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2012 The thesis of Zachary L. Pyle was reviewed and approved* by the following: Cecilia Rusnak Associate Professor of Landscape Architecture Thesis Adviser Caru Bowns Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture Thomas Yahner Associate Professor of Landscape Architecture Charles Andrew Cole Associate Professor of Landscape Architecture Graduate Coordinator *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT As one of the first historic districts to cover an entire township, Oley Township Historic District in Berks County, Pennsylvania was nominated for inclusion in the National Register in 1982. Through the years since its nomination, local residents and organizations have established a variety of measures to ensure the preservation of Oley’s historic character. While other historic areas in Pennsylvania suffer from uncontrolled suburban sprawl and industrial development, Oley has engaged zoning regulations, farmland preservation programs, and its local residents. In effect, the township exhibits an intact and discernible historic landscape. The goal of this research is to broadly examine Oley’s historic resources in terms of their existence at the present date and connect this continued existence to specific preservation initiatives at the township and county level. This research identifies what factors have contributed to Oley’s intact historic state and suggests how other areas can borrow or learn from this case study.
    [Show full text]
  • Oley Valley Community Fair 2018 Committees & Volunteer
    Oley Valley Community Fair ASSOCIATION P. O. Box 55 Oley, PA 19547 73 rd President’s Message… ANNIVERSARY Dear Fair Friends: I am writing this message to you with lots of personal excitement around the upcoming 73rd annual Oley Valley Community Fair. Why am I so excited? Well, over the past year there have been so many people working very hard to bring you some brand new things to this year’s fair. One of the most exciting new ventures will be the grand unveiling of an official mascot of the Oley Valley Community Fair. Our committee put lots of thought into just what type of mascot would fit well with our agricultural experience at the fair. It will be something that will represent us as a fair and be another icon of our great event held every year in September. So, just what will that mascot be? What might it look like? I invite all of you to the Opening Ceremony on Thursday at noon to be the first to see our new mascot. What’s that? It needs a name? Well, of course it does and here is the next exciting part, you just may be the lucky person to name our mascot. Please see the entry form and rules inside this book. But wait, the excitement doesn’t just end with the new mascot. Upon arrival at the fair, you will notice a brand new pavilion that was built for additional seating for all of you to sit down and enjoy those famous fair French Fries or whatever your favorite fair food is.
    [Show full text]