A Trawl Design: Employing Electricity to Selectively Capture Shrimp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Trawl Design: Employing Electricity to Selectively Capture Shrimp MFR PAPER 1325 nificant when juvenile fishes are dis­ cardcd on thc inshore nursery grounds. One solution to eliminate the fishing pressure on demersal fin fish hy shri mp trawlers is to develop trawling gear that A Trawl Design: Employing Electricity captures only shrimp while avoiding fish. As a conservation measure. the to Selectively Capture Shrimp NMFS Harvesting Technology Group at Pascagoula. Miss .. has undertaken the development of selective shrimp trawling gear to reduce the finfish har­ vest by the shrimp Reets in the south­ WILBER R. SEIDEL and JOHN W. WATSON, Jr. eastern United States. WEBBING PANEL TYPE SEPARATOR TRAWLS The initial effort to develop a simple ABSTRACT-A shrimp trawl designed to selectively capture shrimp and elimi­ and economical trawl. which would be nate the incidental capture of bottomfish and other marine organisms is described. similar to a conventional shrimp trawl, The purpose of this trawl is to conserve the fish presently lost during shrimp was to attempt separation using web­ trawling. Normal shrimp trawl bycatch is eliminated by completely closing the bing panels inside the trawl to sort entrance to the net with a webbing panel. Shrimp pass into the trawl through the shrimp from fish (Seidel, 1975; Watson bottom ofthe net which is constructed oflarge mesh webbing. Effective control and and McVea, 1977). Webbing panels separation ofshrimp and fish utilizes the behavioral difference ofthe animals when were strategically placed in conven­ exposed to an electrical field. Shrimp are forced up through the bottom mesh of the tional shrimp trawls to use water flow net by the electrical field located under the net, while the fish are frightened away through the net to force shrimp through from the path of the net by the electricity. the panels into the trawl bag. Fish were led along the panel into an escape INTRODUCTION discard rate by the U. S. shrimp Reet chute, which allowed them to escape was 330,000 t (S. Drummond, South­ the trawl unharmed (Fig. I). The panel The catch per unit effort in the Gulf east Fisheries Center, Pascagoula separator trawl is a simple approach to of Mexico industrial bOllomfish fishery Laboratory, Pascagoula, Miss., pers. the discard problem and, if successful, has steadily declined since 1975. The commun.). The NMFS shrimp Reet could easily be adopted by the shrimp vast abundance of these fish in the discard survey data for 1975 shows that industry. northern Gulf of Mexico may be near­ 15,400 t of Atlantic croaker, Mirropo­ The Harvesting Technology Group ing an end. Juhl et al. (1976) reported a gon undu/atus, spot, Leiostomus has been developing and evaluating marked drop in the availability of bot­ xanthurus, and sand seatrout, Cynos­ webbing panel type separator trawls in tom fish on traditional fishery grounds rion arenarius, were discarded in the the Gulf of Mexico since 1975. The and hypothesized that the uecline may inshore waters (0-10 m) off Louisiana, development work has resulted in a be due to heavy fishing by shrimp ves­ Mississippi, and Alabama. Data col­ separator trawl that functions relatively sels, which discard a large tonnage of lected by the Mississippi Gulf Coast well under most conditions in the the demersal tin fish. Research Laboratory indicates that offshore shrimp fishery (10-30 fath­ The latest National Marine Fisheries large numbers of juvenile Atlantic oms). Comparative trawling tests be­ Service (NMFS) figures indicate that croaker, Gulf menhaden (Brevoortia tween the separator and standard the magnitude of shrimp effort and the patronus), spot, and sand seatrout pre­ shrimp trawls indicate that an average corresponding discard of fish is consid­ sent in the Mississippi Sound were 60-80 percent of Ihe fin fish captured in erable. Total production of ground fish greatly reduced because of intensive a standard trawl can be eliminated by a for 1976 by the commercial fisheries trawling when the shrimp season separator trawl. was 45,350 t. In 1975 the esti mated opened in June 1976. A major problem with the webbing It is apparent that the discarding of panel type separator trawl, however, is Wilber R. Seidel and John W. Wat­ fish by the shrimp Reets causes greater the Joss of shrimp. No matter what the son, Jr. are with the Pascagoula than normal fish mortality, and can be a specific design, some portion of shrimp Laboratory, Southeast Fisheries major factor contributing to the decline entering the trawl mouth will pass out Center, National Marine Fisheries in the Gulf ground fish stocks. These the escape exit along with the finfish. Service, NOAA, Pascagoula, MS 39567. This is Contribution No. discards will certainly contribute to a Shrimp loss can vary greatly depending 78-22P from the Southeast Fisheries further reduction in fish stock abun­ on conditions encountered. On the Center, Pascagoula Laboratory. dance and may be particularly sig- majority of offshore fishing grounds Sep/ell1ber /978 2/ tem, and particularly the electrode array design, have significantly im­ proved performance. Recent be­ havioral studies of shrimp reactions to the electrical stimulus and field experi­ ments with the trawl established the first known. accurately defined catch o ······CHUTE EXIT efficiency for any trawl (Watson, 1976). Further studies of fish behavior ····ESCAPE CHUTE to electrical fields made possible the control of fishes by electrotaxis (K lima, "'CHUTE SLIDE 1972; Seidel and Klima. 1974). This expertise and technology. which has ...........·::·.>·:'.SEPARATOR PANELS been established within the Harvesting Technology Group. can be utilized to develop a shrimp separator trawl sys­ lem which potentially could eliminate the capture of all fish on any shrimp ground, and would certainly offer a solution to the difficult problem of / separating fish and shrimp on the in­ shore grounds. A general concept of the Figure I. .-Webbing panel type shrimp separator (rawl design. trawl design follows. SELECTIVE ELECTRIC SHRIMP TRAWL where most of the fish are larger and not more dense and the fish sizes generally heavily concentrated, the separator smaller. Under these conditions, where A diagrammatic view of a selective trawl shrimp catch can average as little a shrimp separator trawl is most shrimp trawl using electricity is shown as 10 percent less than the standard needed, the conventional webbing in Figure 2. The most prominent and shrimp trawl. When heavy concentra­ panel type separator trawl is the least unusual feature of this concept is that tions of fish are encountered (500­ efficient and would be unacceptable by the mouth of the trawl is completely 1,000 pounds/hour) or when the fish are shri mp fishermen. There is, therefore, closed with a webbing panel, and 6-8 small in size, the shrimp loss may reach an urgent need for a more effective ap­ feel of setback is provided to give the 50-60 percent. The smaller fish also proach to the fish discard problem, par­ mouth panel a pronounced slope (Fig. tend to gill in the separator panel and ticularly by the inshore shrimp fishery, 3). The fish barrier closing the mouth of block the panel, thereby reducing the even though the solution may be more the trawl is made of webbing and allows amount of shrimp that can pass through complicated and somewhat more ex­ water to flow through the trawl, but to the bag. Large concentrations of fish pensive to use. prevents fish from entering the net. A also cause more shrimp to be carried out large (12- to l8-inch) mesh bottom RECENT ADVANCES the fish exit without contacting the panel is placed in the net and the trawl is IN ELECTRICAL separator panels. One other factor af­ adjusted to fish 12-24 inches from the FISHING TECHNOLOGY fecting the efficiency of the shrimp bottom. The electrode array is attached separator trawl is the towing time. As it The Harvesting Technology Group to the footrope of the trawl and trails increases, so does the rate of shrimp has been involved in applying electrical back under the net to create an electrical loss because accumulating fish clog the fishing techniques since the mid­ field under the net. The electrodes are separator panels. 1960's. This work resulted in the de­ constructed of I-inch diameter rope Limitations of the panel type velopment of an electric shrimp trawl covered with conducting material to separator trawl make general accep­ system (Seidel, 1969). Although not provide a large diameter electrode and tance of the trawl by the commercial widely accepted at present by the thus increase the electrical current flow shrimp fleet doubtful. Results indicate fishing industry, the electric shrimp into the water. A capacitor discharge good potential for limited application trawl system is an effective harvesting electrical pulsar, similar to that de­ on many offshore shrimp grounds, but device and can increase shrimp produc­ scribed by Seidel (1969) and Watson it is not likely to be universally ac­ tion day or night. Recent advances by (1976), is used to create the electrical cepted. The greatest potential destruc­ the Harvesting Technology Group with field, which controls the behavior of the tion of ground fish stocks by shrimp the electric shrimp trawl system have shrimp. Shrimp are forced to jump up trawlers occurs in the inshore shrimp greatly improved its capability. Im­ through the large mesh bottom panel, fishery where fish concentrations are provements to the electrical pulser sys- while fish stimulated by the field are 22 Marine Fisheries Review herded ahead of the trawl (Fig. 3). ~_lARGI MISH _OHOM Other fish are simply directed away from the trawl by the closed mouth. This approach is unique and differs from other separator trawl designs in that the fish never enter the trawl; there­ fore, they do not have to be separated from the shrimp catch.
Recommended publications
  • Pyramid Lake Northern Paiute Fishing: the Ethnographic Record
    Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 176-186 (1981). Pyramid Lake Northern Paiute Fishing: The Ethnographic Record CATHERINE S. FOWLER JOYCE E. BATH HE importance of fishing to the ethno­ 1930's as part of his general ethnographic Tgraphic subsistence regimes of lake- investigations of the Nevada Northern Paiute. and river-based Northern Paiute groups has Park also made material culture collections been suggested by several writers but not fully that included fishing gear for the Peabody documented. For example, in the context of Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology and the Culture Element Distribution surveys, for the American Museum of Natural History. Stewart (1941:370-371) affirms that fish These objects, as well as others from collec­ were taken by most groups using specialized tions made in 1875 by Stephen Powers and in gear such as nets, baskets, weirs, platforms, 1916 by Samuel Barrett, were recently harpoons, and gorge and composite hooks. studied and photographed as part of a project Curtis (1926:71) notes the use of dip nets, gill to make Park's data more readily available.' nets, bident spears, gorges, and weirs. And Taken together, these materials significantly Wheat (1967) describes in detail the manufac­ expand our knowledge of Northern Paiute ture and use of the single-barbed harpoon. fishing techniques, and by implication, sug­ However, only Speth (1969) has attempted to gest that fishing and other lacustrine, riverine, place Northern Paiute fishing in its broader and marsh-oriented subsistence pursuits were social and technological contexts, and her vitally important in the economic systems of paper is concerned exclusively with fishing at several Northern Paiute groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Tips
    Fishing Tips These are only tips, other methods may be preferred Spring Summer Fall Mid May - Mid June Mid June to Mid August Mid August to Oct If fishing in less than 15' and waters & colder than Water temps 55° to 65°, fish about 15-25' Walleyes 55°, use jigs tipped w/minnows; If water temp use slip bobber rigs w/leeches or spinner rigs Line: 6-8 lb clear reaches 55° and warmer switch your bait to with live bait or a jig w/live bait; Also try As water temps begin to cool, reverse the mono or florocarbon leeches; If water temps are below 55° and fish fishing in 10' or less with nightcrawlers on 1/8 oz back to the spring fishing techniques are lathargic, use silver, gold & green crank baits jigs near deep weed lines; Water temps 65° - 75° as described by water temps and depths. Rod: 6-6 1/2' Medium such as shad raps - if temps are even colder, use in 25' deep plus troll w/deep diving crank baits suspending jerk baits. Small & Large Mouth Bass In water temps up to 60° fish various depths. Use crank and suspending jerk baits along w/grubs At 70° start using tube jigs or try leeches or night Line: 8-10 lb clear and large plastic worms. Never count out using crawlers at about 20 -25' are best. Top water As temps begin to cool, reverse the process. mono or florocarbon a topwater bait at anytime! At about 60° the fishing is best the first 2 hours after sunrise and Try using some large plastic worms for top water action explodes; continue using the last 2 hours before sunset; Poppers and large mouth - they work well.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Real Impacts of the Use of Drifting Fads on Pelagic Marine Ecosystems?
    F I S H and F I S H E R I E S , 2013, 14, 391–415 Is it good or bad to fish with FADs? What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems? Laurent Dagorn1, Kim N. Holland2, Victor Restrepo3 & Gala Moreno4 1Institut de Recherche pour le De´veloppement (IRD), UMR 212, PO Box 570, Victoria, Seychelles, 2Hawaiian Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB), University of Hawaii, PO Box 1346, Kaneohe, HI, 96744, USA, 3ISSF, 805 15th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20005, USA and 4AZTI-Tecnalia/Herrera Kaia., Portualdea, z/g, 20110, Pasaia, Gipuzkoa, Spain Abstract Correspondence: The use of fish aggregating devices (FADs) by purse seine fisheries has come under Laurent Dagorn, Institut de Recherche increasing criticism for its potential deleterious impacts on tuna stocks, for high pour le De´veloppe- levels of by-catch and threats to the biodiversity of tropical pelagic ecosystems. ment (IRD), UMR Here, we review the current state of scientific knowledge of this fishing technique 212, PO Box 570, and current management strategies. Our intent is to encourage objective discussion Victoria, Seychelles of the topic and highlight areas worthy of future research. We show that catching Tel/Fax: +248 4224 742 juvenile tuna around FADs does not necessarily result in overfishing of stocks, E-mail: laurent. although more selective fishing techniques would likely help obtain higher yield. [email protected] Levels of non-tuna by-catch are comparable to or less than in other commercial tuna fisheries and are primarily comprised of species that are not considered threa- Received 7 Nov tened.
    [Show full text]
  • Beginner's Guide to Fishing
    Beginner’s Guide to Fishing www.dnr.sc.gov/aquaticed It is my hope that this guide will make your journey into the world of recreational angling (fishin’) uncomplicated, enjoyable and successful. As you begin this journey, I encourage you to keep in mind the words of the 15th century nun Dame Juliana Berner, “Piscator non solum piscatur.” Being a 15th century nun, naturally Dame Juliana tended to write in Latin. This phrase roughly translates to “there is more to fishing than catching fish.” Dame Juliana knows what she’s talking about, as she’s believed to have penned the earliest known volume of sportfishing, the beginners guide of its day, “ A Tretyse of Fysshyne with an Angle.” As you begin to apply the ideas and concepts in our beginners guide, you will start to develop new skills; you will get to exercise your patience; and, most importantly, you will begin to share special experiences with your family and friends. In the early nineties, I can remember sitting in a canoe with my four-year-old daughter on the upper end of Lake Russell fishing for bream with cane poles and crickets. My daughter looked back at me from the front seat of the canoe and said, “Daddy, I sure do hate to kill these crickets, but we got to have bait.” Later, we spent hours together in the backyard perfecting her cast and talking about how to place the bait in just the right spot. We took those new skills to the pond. The first good cast, bait placed like a pro, and a “big bass” hit like a freight train.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing for Fairness Poverty, Morality and Marine Resource Regulation in the Philippines
    Fishing for Fairness Poverty, Morality and Marine Resource Regulation in the Philippines Asia-Pacific Environment Monograph 7 Fishing for Fairness Poverty, Morality and Marine Resource Regulation in the Philippines Michael Fabinyi Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/ National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Fabinyi, Michael. Title: Fishing for fairness [electronic resource] : poverty, morality and marine resource regulation in the Philippines / Michael Fabinyi. ISBN: 9781921862656 (pbk.) 9781921862663 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Fishers--Philippines--Attitudes. Working poor--Philippines--Attitudes. Marine resources--Philippines--Management. Dewey Number: 333.91609599 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Cover image: Fishers plying the waters of the Calamianes Islands, Palawan Province, Philippines, 2009. Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press Contents Foreword . ix Acknowledgements . xiii Selected Tagalog Glossary . xvii Abbreviations . xviii Currency Conversion Rates . xviii 1 . Introduction: Fishing for Fairness . 1 2 . Resource Frontiers: Palawan, the Calamianes Islands and Esperanza . 21 3 . Economic, Class and Status Relations in Esperanza . 53 4 . The ‘Poor Moral Fisher’: Local Conceptions of Environmental Degradation, Fishing and Poverty in Esperanza . 91 5 . Fishing, Dive Tourism and Marine Protected Areas . 121 6 . Fishing in Marine Protected Areas: Resistance, Youth and Masculinity .
    [Show full text]
  • MIDDLE WOODLAND FISHING METHODS at the BLUE WATER BRIDGE SOUTH SITE (Afho-7)
    MIDDLE WOODLAND FISHING METHODS AT THE BLUE WATER BRIDGE SOUTH SITE (AfHo-7) By Shari L. Prowse MA Abstract This thesis examines the fishing methods used by the pre-contact Native inhabitants of the Blue Water Bridge South site (AfHo-7) through ethnographic and archaeological research, the fish fauna remains and the fishing related artifacts excavated from the site. From these lines of evidence it was determined that spring spawning fish species such as lake sturgeon and walleye were being harvested with the use of harpoons and spears for the former, and fish nets and leisters for the latter. Evidence also strongly suggests the existence of an intensive summer fishery that used nets for the capture of spawning freshwater drum as well as a spring and summer opportunistic fishery that employed fish- hooks and nets. This site was inferred to have followed a spring early-summer macroband settlement pattern with perhaps a minor fall occupation that may have involved fishing for spawning lake whitefish. Based on the overall pattern of settlement and subsistence inferred for the Blue Water Bridge South site and comparisons with other Middle Woodland sites within the central Great Lakes region, it was concluded that the Middle Woodland pattern of settlement and subsistence was highly variable and influenced by both environmental variables and human choice. Chapter 1 Introduction Statement of Goal of Study The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the fishing methods employed by the Native peoples at the Blue Water Bridge South (AfHo-7) site, and by extension, other Middle Woodland peoples. Data will be derived from the fish remains and fishing related artifacts excavated from the Blue Water Bridge South site and will be interpreted in light of information obtained from ethnographic and ethnohistoric sources, archaeological fish research, and fish biology and behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Fishing Methods
    FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CENTRE BASIC FISHING METHODS SEAFISH FLUME TANK Manchester Street Hull APRIL 2005 CLASSIFICATION OF FISHING GEAR Surrounding nets Purse nets Ring nets Seine nets Beach seines Scottish seines Anchor seines Pair seines Trawls Beam trawl Otter trawl Pair trawl Multi rig trawls Pelagic trawls Pelagic pair trawls Dredges Scallop dredges Gill nets Gill nets Trammel nets Drift nets Traps Pots and creels Fyke nets Hooks and lines Long lines Jigging Trolling Pole lines Miscellaneous Lift nets Cast nets Harpoons Fish pumps ©Seafish 1 18/05/2005 GEAR DESCRIPTIONS ENCIRCLING RING NET Net operated by surrounding a shoal of pelagic fish with a “wall” of netting, often operated by two boats. PURSE SEINE A large net used to surround a shoal of pelagic fish, the bottom of which is then drawn together to enclose them BEACH SEINE An encircling net shot from a small boat then drawn ashore by ropes. ANCHOR SEINE An encircling net shot in the open sea using very long ropes to lay out the net and ropes on the seabed prior to hauling from a boat at anchor. Sometimes called Danish seine. SCOTTISH SEINE An encircling net shot in the open sea using very long ropes to lay out the net and ropes on the seabed prior to towing the net closed and hauling from a boat under its own power. Sometimes called fly dragging or fly shooting. TOWED GEAR BEAM TRAWL Trawl towed on the seabed in which the net is held open by a wood or steel beam. OTTER TRAWL Trawl towed on the seabed, held open by a pair of otter boards (trawl doors).
    [Show full text]
  • Survey and Impact Assessment of Derelict Fish Traps in St. Thomas and St
    Survey and Impact Assessment of Derelict Fish Traps in St. Thomas and St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands Randy Clark Simon J. Pittman Timothy A. Battista Chris Caldow NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science June 2012 NOAA TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NOS NCCOS 147 NOAA NCCOS Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment Acknowledgements Many thanks go to NOAA’s Marine Debris Program for providing the funding for this project. We would like to thank all those who made this project successful, we are grateful for your help and assistance: To all the members of the St. Thomas Fishermen’s Association, and in particular, Julian Magras, Darryl Bryan and Winston Ledee. Lance Horn and Glenn Taylor with NOAA’s Undersea Research Center, and all the crew from the NOAA ship R/V Nancy Foster- thanks for helping us with the derelict fi sh trap verifi cation! Thank you to the great folks at the U.S. Navy’s Naval Surface Warfare Center-Panama City Division, especially Ana Ziegler and Aamir Qaiyumi; and Rafe Boulon and Ken Wilde at the National Park Service, St. John Virgin Islands Coral Reef National Monument. In addition, we would like to thank L. Bauer, M. Kendall, and A. Uhrin for their constructive comments on the manuscript; and Sarah D. Hile and Jamie Higgins for document production. Contract support was provided by Consolidated Safety Service, Inc. under NOAA Contract No. DG133C07NC0616. The covers for this document were designed and created by Gini Kennedy (NOAA). Cover photos were provided by St. Thomas Fishermen’s Association (far left photo in banner on front cover) and NOAA NCCOS Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment’s Biogeography Branch (all other photos).
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Techniques to Reduce the Bycatch of Threatened Marine Animals
    PAPER Fishing Techniques to Reduce the Bycatch of Threatened Marine Animals AUTHORS ABSTRACT Timothy Werner Unintended injuries and fatalities to non-target marine species—a major component of Scott Kraus “bycatch”—is one of the principal threats to the survival of many endangered marine New England Aquarium populations and species. This paper describes both proposed and existing fishing tech- Andrew Read niques for reducing non-target species bycatch, and reviews their focus across different Duke University fisheries and wildlife groups. The intent of this inventory was to gain a better understanding of the range of techniques available and to highlight priorities for research and develop- Erika Zollett ment. In all, 55 techniques were identified, with the majority directed at reducing bycatch in University of New Hampshire longline fisheries, and intended to benefit primarily seabirds, sea turtles, and small mam- mals. Bycatch reduction is a dynamic field with many examples of effective techniques, though some underserved fisheries and wildlife groups should receive more attention. Introduction illions of dollars are spent each year Methodology some techniques mainly used in aquaculture in the research and development of fishing We attempted to document all available operations became part of the final list. Mtechniques to reduce unintended injuries and information on fishing techniques that have Generally, in categorizing bycatch reduc- fatalities to non-target marine species that forms been used to reduce non-target wildlife spe- tion
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Fish Aggregating Devices in the Pacific
    The benefits of fish aggregating devices in the Pacific Michael Sharp Fisheries Development Officer (Economics) Nearshore Fisheries Development Section, Coastal Fisheries Programme Secretariat of the Pacific Community. Email: [email protected] Introduction important to recognise that FADs provide an array of benefits. Anderson and Gates (1996) define the benefits Fish aggregating devices (FADs) are widely used in Pa- of FADs as follows. cific Island countries and territories (PICTs) as a means to improve fisheries production in oceanic and, more Increased fishery production – Due to the aggregating recently, inshore fisheries. Traditional FADs have been phenomenon of FADs, they are known to increase catch used since the early 1900s, when Indonesian and Filipi- per unit of effort (CPUE), which allows for increased no fishermen used floating rafts of bamboo to aggregate access to protein or saleable product. Increased produc- schools of fish. Recent developments in and experimen- tion plays an important role in food security at the sub- tation with modern FAD design, deployment site, and sistence level while allowing for increased revenue in the deployment depth has occurred throughout the Pacific commercial sector. Detolle et al (1998) claim that catch- as a means to improve yields of and access to artisanal es at Reunion Island increased by 143% over a period of fish stocks. eight years subsequent to the deployment of FADs. Significant government capital and human resources Reduced pressure on reef resources – Factors such have been allocated to the fabrication, deployment and as modern fishing gear and techniques, increasing maintenance of FADs, and training of fishermen in FAD population, exports, and tourism — to name a few — are fishing techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline for Spearfishing Study Writeup
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-PIFSC-31 March 2012 The Sociocultural Importance of Spearfishing in Hawaiʻi Brent W. Stoffle and Stewart D. Allen Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of Commerce About this document The mission of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is to understand and predict changes in the Earth’s environment and to conserve and manage coastal and oceanic marine resources and habitats to help meet our Nation’s economic, social, and environmental needs. As a branch of NOAA, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) conducts or sponsors research and monitoring programs to improve the scientific basis for conservation and management decisions. NMFS strives to make information about the purpose, methods, and results of its scientific studies widely available. NMFS’ Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC) uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS series to achieve timely dissemination of scientific and technical information that is of high quality but inappropriate for publication in the formal peer- reviewed literature. The contents are of broad scope, including technical workshop proceedings, large data compilations, status reports and reviews, lengthy scientific or statistical monographs, and more. NOAA Technical Memoranda published by the PIFSC, although informal, are subjected to extensive review and editing and reflect sound professional work. Accordingly, they may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. A NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS issued by the PIFSC may be cited using the following format: Stoffle, B. W., and S. D. Allen. 2012. The sociocultural importance of spearfishing in Hawai`i.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermediate Fishing: Tackle and Techniques
    S E C T I O N INTERMEDIATE5 FISHING: TACKLE AND TECHNIQUES You’ve mastered fishing with spin-casting gear. What’s next? Plenty! You’re ready to explore a wide variety of other gear, from spinning and bait-casting equipment, to fly rods that can cast the tiniest of flies. Master one or try them all. This chapter will help get you started. Beginners’ Guide to Freshwater Fishing 41 INTERMEDIATE FISHING: TACKLE AND TECHNIQUES COMPARING “SPIN-CASTING” TO “SPINNING” GEAR While spin-casting gear is fine for catching smaller fish, many people like to learn how to use spinning gear, which is used to catch everything from little panfish to lunker pike. Spinning reels are different from spin-casting reels Advantages of spinning reels compared to spin- in several ways: casting reels: • They are open-faced (no spool cover). • They typically have a better drag system. • They have a bail and line guide instead of a • They hold more line. casting pushbutton. • They make casting lightweight lures and baits easier. • They mount under the rod (instead of on top). Spinning rods are different from spin-casting rods Disadvantages of spinning reels compared to spin- in several ways: casting reels: • They have larger line guides mounted on the • They cost more. underside instead of the top of the rod. • They sometimes have annoying line twist, requiring that • They have a much wider range of lengths and rod you remove the line and respool the reel. action (how flexible a rod is). Line roller Bail Reel foot Drag Reel handle Spool Anti-reverse 42 Beginners’ Guide to Freshwater Fishing INTERMEDIATE FISHING: TACKLE AND TECHNIQUES HOW TO USE SPINNING GEAR Casting 1.
    [Show full text]