DOCSLIB.ORG

Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography for Women in the Age Group of 70-74 Years Appendix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography for Women in the Age Group of 70-74 Years Appendix KCE REPORT 176S BREAST CANCER SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY FOR WOMEN IN THE AGE GROUP OF 70-74 YEARS APPENDIX 2012 www.kce.fgov.be KCE REPORT 176S GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE BREAST CANCER SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY FOR WOMEN IN THE AGE GROUP OF 70-74 YEARS APPENDIX FRANÇOISE MAMBOURG, JO ROBAYS, SOPHIE GERKENS 2012 www.kce.fgov.be COLOPHON Title: Breast cancer screening with mammography for women in the age group of 70-74 years - Appendix Authors: Françoise Mambourg (KCE), Jo Robays (KCE), Sophie Gerkens (KCE) Reviewers: Frank Hulstaert (KCE), Pascale Jonckheer (KCE) External Experts: Marc Arbijn (WIV - ISP), Martine Berlière (UCL Saint-Luc), Hilde Bosmans (UZ Leuven), Jean-Benoit Burrion (ASBL Brummammo), Joëlle Desreux (CHU Liège), André-Robert Grivegnée (Institut Jules Bordet), Patrick Neven (UZ Leuven), Myriam Provost (SSMG), Hubert Thierens (UGent), Reinhilde Van Eeckhoudt (WVG), Anne Vandenbroucke (UCL Saint-Luc), Geert Villeirs (UZ Gent). External Validators: Philippe Autier (IPRI-Lyon), Geert Page (Jan Yperman Ziekenhuis), Chantal Van Ongeval (KU Leuven) Conflict of interest: None declared Layout: Ine Verhulst Disclaimer: • The external experts were consulted about a (preliminary) version of the scientific report. Their comments were discussed during meetings. They did not co-author the scientific report and did not necessarily agree with its content. • Subsequently, a (final) version was submitted to the validators. The validation of the report results from a consensus or a voting process between the validators. The validators did not co-author the scientific report and did not necessarily all three agree with its content. • Finally, this report has been approved by common assent by the Executive Board. • Only the KCE is responsible for errors or omissions that could persist. The policy recommendations are also under the full responsibility of the KCE. Publication date: 21 June 2012(2nd print; 1st print: 26 April 2012) Domain: Good Clinical Practice (GCP) MeSH: Breast Neoplasms ; Mammography ; Mass Screening NLM Classification: WP 870 - Breast - Neoplasms Language: English Format: Adobe® PDF™ (A4) Legal depot: D/2012/10.273/20 Copyright: KCE reports are published under a “by/nc/nd” Creative Commons Licence http://kce.fgov.be/content/about-copyrights-for-kce-reports How to refer to this document ? Mambourg F, Robays J, Gerkens S. Breast cancer screening with mammography for women in the age group of 70-74 years - Appendix. Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowlegde Centre (KCE). 2012. KCE Report 176S. D/2012/10.273/20. This document is available on the website of the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre. KCE Report 176 Breast cancer screening 1 APPENDIX REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. REVIEW OF CLINICAL STUDIES ........................................................................................................ 3 1.1. PICO ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (SR) AND META-ANALYSES (MA) ............................................................. 3 1.2.1. Search for SR and MA ............................................................................................................ 3 1.3. RANDOMISED CONTROL TRIALS ...................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1. Search for RCTs ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4. ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.4.1. Diagnostic Errors ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.4.2. DCIS ........................................................................................................................................ 6 1.4.3. Overtreatment ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.4.4. Sojourn Time ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.5. QUALITY APPRAISAL .......................................................................................................................... 8 1.5.1. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses .................................................................................. 8 1.5.2. RCT ......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.6. DATA EXTRACTION TABLE .............................................................................................................. 10 1.6.1. Specific mortality reduction ................................................................................................... 10 1.6.2. All-cause mortality reduction ................................................................................................. 14 1.6.3. False positive and false negative mammography results ..................................................... 16 1.6.4. Over-diagnosis ...................................................................................................................... 17 1.6.5. DCIS ...................................................................................................................................... 19 1.6.6. Overtreatment ....................................................................................................................... 20 2. REVIEW OF MODELLING STUDIES ................................................................................................. 21 2.1. LITERATURE SEARCH STRATEGY .................................................................................................. 21 2.2. FLOW DIAGRAM ................................................................................................................................. 25 3. REVIEW OF QUALITY OF LIFE STUDIES ........................................................................................ 26 2 Breast cancer screening KCE Report 176 3.1. SEARCH STRATEGY ......................................................................................................................... 26 3.2. RESULTS OF THE SEARCH STRATEGY ......................................................................................... 29 3.3. SUMMARY OF SELECTED STUDIES ................................................................................................ 31 4. DECISION ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................ 49 4.1. BREAST CANCER STAGE SPECIFIC RELATIVE SURVIVAL .......................................................... 49 5. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 51 KCE Report 176 Breast cancer screening 3 1. REVIEW OF CLINICAL STUDIES Medline 1. meta-analysis.pt,ti,ab,sh. 21 (OVID): 2. 1 or (meta anal$ or metaanal$).ti,ab,sh. 1.1. PICO Filter 3. (methodol$ or systematic$ or Benefit SR or M-A quantitativ$).ti,ab,sh. • Patient: women between 70 and 74 years without breast cancer 4. ((methodol$ or systematic$ or symptom and without high risk of breast cancer quantitativ$) adj (review$ or overview$ or survey$)).ti,ab,sh. • Intervention: organized screening 5. (medline or embase or index • Comparison: usual care medicus).ti,ab. • Outcomes: mortality (all causes and specific), morbidity (mastectomy 6. ((pool$ or combined or combining) adj partial or complete) (data or trials or studies or results)).ti,ab. Harms 7. 6 or 4 or 3 or 5 • Patient: women between 70 and 74 years without breast cancer 8. 7 and review.pt,sh. symptom and without high risk of breast cancer 9. 8 or 2 • Intervention: organized screening 10. Case report.tw. • Comparison: usual care 11. Letter.pt. • Outcomes: diagnosis or therapeutics radiation side effects, additional 12. Historical article.pt. diagnosis tests, true positive, true negative, over diagnosis and over 13. Review of reported cases.pt. treatment. 14. Review,multicase.pt. 1.2. Systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MA) 15. or/10-14 A broad search of electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, CDSR) was 16. 9 not 15 conducted in April 2011. 17. Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ 1.2.1. Search for SR and MA 18. Neoplasms/ Search Benefit and harms of mammography screening (70-74 y) 19. 17 and 18 questions 20. exp Breast Neoplasms/ Note Specific search for systematic reviews and meta-analysis 21. (breast$ adj5 neoplas$).tw. Update of KCE report 11 (search date 2004). 22. (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw. Date 18/04/2011 on OVID Ovid MEDLINE(R) 23. (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw. 24. (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw. Keywords Breast neoplasms (MESH) and mass screening (or early 25. (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw. detection) (MESH) and mammography (MESH) 4 Breast cancer screening KCE Report 176 26. (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw. 1.3. Randomised control trials 27. exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ A broad search of electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE,CCRT) was 28. 19 or 20 or 21 or 22 or 23 or 24 or 25 or conducted in April 2011. 26 or 27 1.3.1. Search for RCTs 29. mammography.mp. Search Benefit and harms of mammography screening (69-74 y) 30. Mammography/ questions 31. 29 or 30 Note Specific search for randomised
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Jules Bordet Institute Is Participating
    Press release for immediate release Facing cancer: eat and move! Brussels, November 12, 2020 – On 12 November, the Jules Bordet Institute, the Belgian reference centre in the fight against cancer, is participating in Nutrition Day. The occasion to again stress the essential link between healthy eating combined with regular physical exercise and treatment against cancer. Eat and move: two health "assets" that are in your hands when facing this disease. Nutrition Day, an international audit of the nutrition of hospitalised patients – figures Initiated in 2006 by Vienna University and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), every year Nutrition Day undertakes a vast international audit (64 countries) inside hospitalisation units. Carried out by dietetic and nutrition teams, this audit looks at the nutritional status of patients before and after a period of hospitalisation and its impact on mortality in the 30 days following the audit. The results raise serious questions. The analysis of the figures since 2006 shows that in Belgium 50% of patients eat less during the week prior to hospitalisation, 40% of patients experience an involuntary weight loss during the 3 months prior to hospitalisation, and 14% of patents eat nothing during their hospitalisation. The follow-up of patients 30 days following the audit shows an increased mortality (2% to 8%) among patients who lost weight or ate less before and/or during their hospitalisation. This was observed among all age groups but is more significant among elderly subjects. Findings that confirm the importance of nutritional care when treating patients. As a cancer patient, watch out for involuntary weight loss! When facing cancer it is important to consult a dietician so as to adopt an appropriate diet that makes it possible to control weight increases and losses.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENTIFIC REPORT 2020 for the Years 2016 to 2019 Table of Contents
    SCIENTIFIC REPORT 2020 For the years 2016 to 2019 Table of Contents 3 Foreword 4 Research in Numbers 7 Strategic Vision 9 Research Pillars 10 Pillar I: Dissecting Tumour Survival Mechanisms and Tumour Microenvironment 18 Pillar II: Tracking and Targeting Minimal Residual Disease 22 Pillar III: Next Generation Molecular Imaging to Better Personalise Treatment 27 Pillar IV: Accelerating Anticancer Drug Development 33 Pillar V: Developing New Approaches to Patient Empowerment and Well-being 40 New facilities will bring new opportunities for research 41 Organisation of Research Governance Research Support Units 48 Collaborations 51 Funding Les Amis de l’Institut Bordet Research Grants 54 Visiting Medical Research Fellows (2016-2019) 55 Awards 56 Publications 2016-2019 2016-2019 (Selected Papers) Publications 2019 79 Abbreviations 2 Foreword Dominique de Valeriola General Medical Director Institut Jules Bordet is a public and academic OECI*-certified comprehensive cancer center playing an important role in cancer care, research and education, both in Belgium and internationally. Entirely dedicated to adult cancer patients since its creation in 1939, it belongs to the City of Brussels and the Université Libre de Bruxelles. Both translational and clinical research are part of the Institute’s DNA, aiming to bring research discoveries to the patient’s bedside quickly. The present 2016-2019 scientific report reflects the spirit of commitment and collaboration of the Institute’s healthcare professionals, researchers, and administrative support teams and, above all, of the patients who trust our teams and volunteer to participate in clinical trials. A concerted and well-rewarded effort has been made during these recent years to build a stronger partnership with patients in developing our clinical trials, and to establish more efficient, centralised governance and operational support for our research activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Institut Jules Bordet
    Press release for immediate release A national health plan for cancer patients to avoid a wave of collateral victims! Brussels, 10 April 2020 – The crisis linked to the Covid-19 virus is currently responsible for a slowdown across the range of care needed in the treatment of cancer. As cancer is a major cause of mortality in Belgium the consequences of this must not be under- estimated. The Jules Bordet Institute, the Belgian reference centre for comprehensive cancer treatment, would already like to draw your attention to the measures that will have to be rapidly implemented. The pandemic caused by the Covid-19 virus is at the origin of an exceptional health situation. Every effort is currently being mobilised, among the general population, in medical circles and at the political level. The Jules Bordet Institute fully supports and is fully engaged in this combat. Nevertheless, in the field of cancer many patients do not at present have access to the necessary care in terms of screening, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of their illness. This situation, imposed by the urgency and scale of the current problem, risks being the cause of a second wave of "collateral" victims of the COVID-19 virus. "Contrary to the viral epidemic, this second crisis is totally predictable. It is our responsibility to anticipate it and to envisage the collective measures necessary to limit the consequences. As soon as the pressure of the viral epidemic eases we must be able to resume optimal care for these patients. This is why, following on from the management of the present crisis, the treatment of cancer patients will require exceptional means, coordination and support from society as a whole," explains Vincent Donckier, Head of the Department of Surgery at the Jules Bordet Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Jules Bordet Institute - with a Team of Belgian and International Colleagues, Was Founded with This Aim in Mind
    Press release for immediate release Oncodistinct, a multidisciplinary clinical research network that meets patients' needs Brussels, 23 May 2018 – Cancer research is advancing by leaps and bounds with fast changing developments in cancer treatment. To respond to these changes, clinical research in cancerology must also change. Today there is a real need for new structures that facilitate the pooling of expertise and resources to better meet patients' needs and accelerate the development of new medicines in the fight against cancer. Oncodistinct, a multidisciplinary clinical research network set up by Professor Awada - Head of Medicine and the Medical Oncology Unit at the Jules Bordet Institute - with a team of Belgian and international colleagues, was founded with this aim in mind. A network of 27 cancer centres and university hospitals, Oncodistinct will be holding its bi-annual meeting on 24 May at the Paoli Calmettes Institute in Marseille. Oncodistinct is a multidisciplinary clinical research network set up in November 2015. Its objective is to adapt clinical trial methodology to recent innovations in treatment and accelerate the development of anti-cancer drugs for solid tumours, in particular in situations for which no standard treatment currently exists. As such, the network is seeking to respond to unmet medical needs, especially in the field of brain metastases and rare tumours. The network today has 27 members in all (11 cancer centres and 16 university hospitals) that pool their expertise in oncology and the development of anti-cancer medicines. Members of the Oncodistinct network meet twice yearly to jointly initiate innovative multicentre trials with the aim of improving treatment for cancer patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Dossier De Presse
    Institut Jules Bordet Press kit 1 Contents A word from the General Management ...................................................................................... 3 The Institut Jules Bordet: High-tech medicine fighting cancer ................................................. 5 Presentation of the Institute .................................................................................................... 5 The Institute's three missions ................................................................................................. 6 The Institute in figures (2015) ................................................................................................ 6 The building of the new Institut Jules Bordet: proud of its past, focused on its future.............. 8 The new Institut Jules Bordet – The future Brussels cancer pole .......................................... 8 The project ............................................................................................................................ 10 The major strengths of the new Institut Jules Bordet ........................................................... 14 The new Institut Jules Bordet in figures ............................................................................... 16 O.E.C.I. accreditation and designation: The optimising of quality .......................................... 17 Comprehensive Cancer Centre ............................................................................................. 17 A quality guarantee ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Centenary to Celebrate for the Jules Bordet Institute!
    Press release for immediate release A centenary to celebrate for the Jules Bordet Institute! Brussels, 7th of August, 2019 – 2019 is the centenary year of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine won by Professor Jules Bordet in 1919 for his major discoveries relating to immunity. On this occasion we look back at the historic links between Jules Bordet, an exceptional scientist, and the Institute that bears his name, a reference centre in the fight against cancer in Belgium. Links that continue to this day through modern immunological research. Immunity at the heart of his research and a Nobel Prize in recognition of his work. Jules Bordet was a microbiologist and immunologist. In 1919 he was the first Belgian to be awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in recognition of his major discoveries relating to immunology. Set out in the "Treatise on immunity in infectious diseases", these discoveries show that the organism reacts to the introduction of foreign agents (microbes, cells or substances) by creating antibodies. These antibodies are able to attach themselves to these foreign agents and destroy them thanks to a complement that is present naturally in the body, alexine. With this discovery Jules Bordet laid the foundations of our understanding of humoral immunity, our body's defence system resulting from the combined action of this complement and antibodies, and revealed the way in which microbes are destroyed in vaccinated subjects. The historic links between the Professor and the Jules Bordet Institute In 1894, as a young Doctor of Medicine from the Université libre de Bruxelles, Jules Bordet joined the Pasteur Institute in Paris where he explored the mechanisms of bacteriolysis or the destruction of bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Biopsies Enter Clinical Practice a Major Challenge for European Cancer Centres
    Press release for immediate release Liquid biopsies enter clinical practice A major challenge for European cancer centres Brussels, 8 February 2021. - Liquid biopsies, just a few years ago still used solely in cancer research projects, are today entering the clinic. A new tool for diagnosis and monitoring that is bringing many benefits, for doctors as well as cancer patients. Doctor Michail Ignatiadis, medical oncologist at the Jules Bordet Institute and expert in the field of liquid biopsies, is the author, with George W. Sledge Jr and Stefanie S. Jeffrey, of an article published in the prestigious scientific journal Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. The authors report very specifically on how liquid biopsies are now entering clinical practice and highlight the essential challenge this represents for leading edge medicine in the fight against cancer. A quick reminder: What are liquid biopsies and what do they permit? A liquid biopsy is the analysis of a blood sample for the purposes of detecting the presence of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) or circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in a patient's blood and then analysing them at the molecular level, in particular to search for any mutations. CTCs are cancer cells that have detached themselves from the primary tumour (cancerous process at the site (tissue) where the cancer originated) or metastatic lesions (distant from the primary tumour) that are circulating in the blood and that are at the origin of metastases in various body organs. The potential applications of liquid biopsies are major. It is now possible, by means of a simple blood test, to detect genetic anomalies linked to certain cancers, to monitor the development of the disease, to easily evaluate treatment effectiveness and to guide the choice of a new treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Jules Bordet Institute
    Press release for immediate release The MyPebs study: towards a new strategy for breast cancer screening? 30 August 2021 - The aim of MyPeBS ( My Personal Breast Cancer Screening ) is to evaluate a breast cancer screening strategy based on individual risk. A total of 27 international partners are participating in MyPeBS. The clinical study is taking place in six countries (Belgium, France, Italy, the United Kingdom, Israel, Spain) and is coordinated by Unicancer (France). In Belgium it is being conducted at 10 hospitals and coordinated by the Jules Bordet Institute. The limits of current screening The present screening programme for breast cancer (“Mammotest”) proposes the same screening for all women aged between 50 and 69 on the basis of a single risk factor: age. Yet the risk of cancer varies from one woman to another depending on a number of factors: family history, personal antecedents, lifestyle, genetic constitution. Although the current screening is effective (fewer aggressive therapies, reduced mortality), it does have disadvantages: overdiagnosis (finding and treating tumours that would not have posed a problem), interval cancers (cancers undiagnosed between 2 routine screenings), false positives (women called back for further tests that do not reveal a cancer). MyPeBS, towards a personalised breast cancer screening Today we are able to evaluate individual risk, in a standardised manner that is both reliable and reproducible. MyPeBS ( My Personal Breast Cancer Screening ) is the first European clinical study that aims to evaluate the benefits of personalised screening with a frequency and procedures adapted to the individual risk of each woman. This new screening strategy that takes into account individual risk aims to increase the effectiveness of organised cancer screening while reducing the disadvantages.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer Screening.Pdf
    Breast Cancer Screening Programmes Cervical Cancer Screening Programmes in the EU in 2007 in the EU in 2007 Population-based, Nationwide Population-based, Nationwide Rollout complete Rollout complete Rollout ongoing Rollout ongoing Piloting Piloting Planning Planning Population-based, Regional Non-Population-based, Nationwide Rollout complete Rollout ongoing Population-based and Non-Population-based Piloting No programme Non-Population-based, Nationwide Non-Population-based, Regional Population-based and Non-Population-based No programme Colorectal Cancer Screening Programmes L 327/34 Official Journal of the European Union 16.12.2003 in the EU in 2007 COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Population-based, Nationwide of 2 December 2003 Rollout ongoing on cancer screening Piloting Planning (2003/878/EC) Population-based, Regional Piloting THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Planning Non-Population-based, Nationwide Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Com- Population-based and munity, and in particular Article 152(4), second subparagraph, Non-Population-based thereof, No programme Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament, Whereas: (1) Article 152 of the Treaty provides that Community action is to complement national policies and be directed towards improving public health, preventing human illness and diseases, and obviating sources of danger to human health. Such action shall cover the fight against the major health scourges, by promoting Cancer screening in the European
    [Show full text]
  • 000Cancer Coverlignes 081014.Indd
    KI-NA-23471-EN-C CANCER RESEARCH PROJECTS FUNDED UNDER THE SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME (2002-2006) ???????? Cancer is a complex disease with multiple causation, complex inter- actions at the cell, organism but also at population level. At the same time a challenge for interdisciplinary research collaborative from basic to transnational and clinical level to understand better, to integrate scientifi c expertise from the laboratory to the clinic, to validate new innovative tools for detection and early prognosis, to prevent and cure. The present catalogue includes 108 projects, related to cancer research, includes 1 500 researchers from Europe and beyond who through their research projects participate to the ‘Combating Cancer initiative’ part of the EU’s combating major diseases research in the Sixth framework programme. These projects are in the forefront of European collaborative research and are currently providing information, progress and achievements CANCER RESEARCH CANCER RESEARCH on scientifi c knowledge in cancer research. CANCER RESEARCH PROJECTS FUNDED UNDER THE SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME 2002-2006 PROJECT SYNOPSES PROJECT Interested in European research? Research*eu is our monthly magazine keeping you in touch with main developments (results, programmes, events, etc.). It is available in English, French, German and Spanish. A free sample copy or free subscription can be obtained from: European Commission Directorate-General for Research Communication Unit B-1049 Brussels Fax (32-2) 29-58220 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/research/research-eu HOW TO OBTAIN EU PUBLICATIONS Our priced publications are available from EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu/), where you can place an order with the sales agent of your choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release 28 June 2021
    Press Release 28 June 2021 First results of the European AURORA study: towards a better understanding of the molecular changes driving metastatic breast cancer The comprehensive analyses of data from the first 381 patients included in the AURORA research programme have revealed important molecular and clinical features that shed more light on metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and how it evolves. The detailed results have just been published in Cancer Discovery, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. AURORA is an international academic research programme based on molecular screening and is dedicated to improving our understanding of metastatic breast cancer. It is unique with its large collection of matched primary and metastatic tumour samples, obtained from patients either at the diagnosis of metastatic disease or after one line of treatment, as well as its high-quality clinical data collection. Using these samples and data, researchers can study the molecular changes that occur when breast cancer first starts to spread, and throughout the evolution of metastatic disease. So far, researchers have identified molecular changes that are more common in metastatic samples. These include mutations in driver genes (in 10% of the samples) and in copy number variations (in 30% of samples). These findings could lead to the future development of new treatment strategies for patients with MBC. The programme has already generated what is to our knowledge the largest dataset of RNA sequencing (RNAseq) in MBC. The analyses of RNAseq data from paired primary and metastatic samples from the same patients showed that, in 36% of the cases, the breast cancer intrinsic subtype changes between the primary and the metastatic disease, usually towards a more aggressive form.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributors
    Contributors REFERENCES 1. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, et al. (2004). GLOBOCAN 2002: 10. Laurie SA and Licitra L (2006). Systemic therapy in the pal- cinogenic risks to humans, Volume 69, Polychlorinated dibenzo- Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide. IARC liative management of advanced salivary gland cancers. J Clin para-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans. Lyon, France: CancerBase No. 5 Version 2.0. Lyon: International Agency for Oncol 24: 2673-2678. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Research on Cancer. Available from: http://www-dep.iarc.fr/ 11. Goto M, Miller RW, Ishikawa Y, et al. (1996). Excess of 23. Welton ML, Sharkey FE, Kahlenberg MS (2004). The eti- Date Accessed: November 12, 2008. rare cancers in Werner syndrome (adult progeria). Cancer ology and epidemiology of anal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N 2. Spix C, Pastore G, Sankila R, et al. (2006). Neuroblastoma Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 5: 239-246. Am 13: 263-275. incidence and survival in European children (1978-1997): 12. Takazawa R, Ajima J, Yamauchi A, et al. (2004). Unusual 24. Guenel P, Cyr D, Sabroe S, et al. (2004). Alcohol drink- report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information double primary neoplasia: adrenocortical and ureteral carci- ing may increase risk of breast cancer in men: a European System project. Eur J Cancer 42: 2081-2091. nomas in werner syndrome. Urol Int 72: 168-170. population-based case-control study. Cancer Causes Control 3. Gatta G, Ciccolallo L, Kunkler I, et al. (2006). Survival from 13. Lynch HT and Lynch JF (2004). Lynch syndrome: history 15: 571-580. rare cancer in adults: a population-based study.
    [Show full text]