DOCSLIB.ORG

CHAPTER 1 ORGANISATION PROFILE 1.1: History Founders Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak Created Apple Computer on April 1 1976,And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CHAPTER 1 ORGANISATION PROFILE 1.1: History Founders Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak Created Apple Computer on April 1 1976,And CHAPTER 1 ORGANISATION PROFILE 1.1: History Founders Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak created Apple Computer on April 1 1976,and incorporated the company on January 3, 1977, in Cupertino, California.For more than three decades, Apple Computer was predominantly a manufacturer of personal computers, including the Apple II, Macintosh, and Power Mac lines, but it faced rocky sales and low market share during the 1990s. Jobs, who had been ousted from the company in 1985, returned to Apple in 1996 after his company NeXT was bought by Apple. The following year he became the company's interim CEO, which later became permanent Jobs subsequently instilled a new corporate philosophy of recognizable products and simple design, starting with the original iMac in 1998.With the introduction of the successful iPod music player in 2001 and iTunes Music Store in 2003, Apple established itself as a leader in the consumer electronics and media sales industries, leading it to drop "Computer" from the company's name in 2007. The company is now also known for its iOS range of smart phone, media player, and tablet computer products that began with the iPhone, followed by the iPod Touch and then iPad. 1.2: Geographical region and country Apple inc was established in Cupertino, California,United States of America. Apple Inc largest geographic markets are United States of America, Europe, China, Japan, and Asia Pasific(NASDAQ;APPL). Figure 1: The percentage of Apple Inc Total Net Sales by NASDAQ for the year 2014 1.3: Type of organization 1 Apple Inc., formerly Apple Computer, Inc., is a multinational corporation that creates consumer electronics, personal computers, servers, and computer software, and is a digital distributor of media content. The company also has a chain of retail stores known as Apple Stores. Apple's core product lines are the iPhone smart phone, iPad tablet computer, iPod portable media players, and Macintosh computer line. 1.4: Business Process - In the business process management world(BPM), there is not much said about Apple Inc, and people do not associate Apple Inc with BPM. Some say the association is more like Apple with Innovation instead of BPM. There is a bit of method to Apple’s innovation madness and the business process of Apple Inc can be better understand through its value chain activities as the value chain analysis highlights important tasks or activities that provide Apple Inc competitive advantages that rivals its competitors. Inbound Logistic: Apple Inc has secured hundreds of suppliers worldwide and maintain good supply chain management. Apple’s usually will purchase its material that will cover up to the periods of 150 days. In this process, its CEO Tim Cook is known for his specialty of getting suppliers to compete with each other to secure a contract with Apple Inc, which benefits the company. Operations: The company operations are divided into several segments such as United States of America, Europe, China, Japan, rest of Asian Pasific countries, and other retails company. Their operations are helped by 92,600 full-time employees and around 4,400 full-time equivalent temporary employees and contractors. Majority of Apple’s hardware products are assembled by outsourcing partners primarily located in Asia which is to cut labour costs. Outbound logistics. Apple’s net sales through its direct and indirect distribution channels accounted for 28% and 72% of total net sales respectively. Apple strives to minimize the volume of its inventory due to cost considerations. Marketing and sales: Apple Inc distribute its products into the markets through several channels. Every year, the company spends billions of dolars on utilization of marketing communication mix that focus on integration of advertising, public relations, events and experiences or direct selling. Service: Apple Inc is well known of its exceptional quality of customers support and services during all three stages: pre-purchase, during the purchase and post-purchase. The company established Apple experience centers in major cities around the globe where customers can try its products to become convinced about the quality. Apple sales workers also are usually wel- trained and polite young males and females who are technically experienced to demonstrate product features and capabilities. Post-purchase customer service is also impressive with unique iPhone trade-in programs that allow iPhone users to upgrade their phone to newer models with additional payment. 2 1.5 Website address and homepage image - http://www.apple.com/ Figure 2: Homepage of the Apple Inc Website. CHAPTER 2 DESCRIPTION OF IS STRATEGY TRIANGLE OF APPLE INC. 3 After Jobs resigned as CEO and became chairman of the board, Cook was named the new Chief Executive Officer of Apple Inc. on August 24, 2011. Thus bringing major changes in the successful company. Both CEOs has different management style and philosophy thus, affecting the balance of the IS Strategy Triangle of Apple Inc. Major comparison between the old and new IS Strategy triangle are shown in diagrams below followed with explainations. Business Strategy Focused on innovation Organizational Strategy IS Strategy “Dictatorship” style and IT investment to complicated work support innovation- madness Diagram 2.1 OldBusiness IS Strategy Strategy Triangle(Steve Job as CEO, 1997-2011). Organizational Strategy IS Strategy 4 Focus on improvement of products Decentralization of decision making and Effective and efficient improved work investment in IT within Diagram 2.2 New IS Strategy Triangle(Tim Cook as CEO, 2011-2016) Business Strategy Under Jobs' leadership, Apple kicked into high gear in terms of the products it released to the public. Jobs oversaw the introduction of the iMac, the iPod, iTunes, the iPhone, the App store and the iPad. This suite of products still makes up the core business of Apple. Cook, however, has only overseen the introduction of the iPad mini, the iPad retina and the Apple Watch in his three years as CEO. However, Jobs was the CEO of Apple for a much longer term than Cook's current tenure, so he had more time to implement new products. Cook's focus on Apple's core business and his decision to pump the brakes on new products is typical of his style and ideology. While Jobs was looking to constantly innovate, Cook seeks to focus on products that are already doing very well. For example, the Apple Watch is an expansion of the iPhone, rather than an entirely new and innovative product. Dr. Panos Mourdoukoutas also asserts that, “Under Tim Cook, Apple has been churning out new versions of old products that are destined to reach their limits. Tim Cook’s Apple has not yet launch a new product that may replace the iPhone, the iPad and the MacBook. The business model of Apple has shifted from the Steve Jobs to the Tim Cook era,Steve Jobs emphasized the construction of brand new 5 innovative technologies whereas Tim Cook has only been producing slightly improved versions of existent Apple products. For example, instead of having any true innovation with the newly released iPhone 5, Cook focused on tightening up many aspects of the existing smartphone model such as the iPhone 4, he increased its size, allowing it to compete with other larger phones such as those created by rival Samsung and cut Apple’s contract with Google for its Maps service and replaced it with a proprietary map system this let Apple inc to rely less on Google and shore up its own service platform, which will pay off in the future. However, this does not conclude that under Tim Cook’s management the company is failing. Contradictory to the pessismistic view of the new CEO, the stock price for Apple Inc increase drastically. Diagram 2.3 Difference in Apple Inc Stock values Organizational Strategy Apple’s organizational structure is one of the factors contributing to the company’s successful innovation. The success of the company is linked to innovation and the leadership of Steve Jobs, but its organizational structure is partly responsible for ensuring support for such leadership. Now, under 6 Tim Cook’s leadership, Apple has made some small changes in its organizational structure to suit market and industry demands. Most significant characteristics of Apple’s organizational structure: 1. Spoke-and-wheel hierarchy 2. Function-based grouping 3. Product-based grouping Spoke-and-Wheel Hierarchy. A bird’s-eye view of Apple’s organizational structure shows considerable hierarchy. In the past, everything went through Steve Jobs’ office. Jobs made all the major decisions. However, under Tim Cook’s leadership, this hierarchy in Apple’s organizational structure has slightly changed. There is now more collaboration among different parts of the company, such as software teams and hardware teams. Apple’s vice presidents have more autonomy, which was almost absent under Jobs. Thus, the company’s organizational structure is now less stiff, but still has a spoke-and-wheel hierarchy where Tim Cook is at the center. Function-Based Grouping. The upper tier of Apple’s organizational structure has function-based grouping, which an element is derived from the functional type of organizational structure. Each senior vice president who reports to Tim Cook handles a business function. For example, Apple has an SVP for industrial design, an SVP for marketing, and another SVP for retail. In this aspect of the organizational structure, Apple’s top leaders address business needs in terms of function areas. Product-Based Grouping. The lower tier of Apple’s organizational structure has product-based grouping, which an element is derived from the divisional type of organizational structure. Below the senior vice presidents, there are many vice presidents for different outputs or products. For example, Apple has a VP for iOS apps, a VP for iPad, and another VP for consumer apps.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Apple & Deloitte Team up to Accelerate Business
    NEWS RELEASE Apple & Deloitte Team Up to Accelerate Business Transformation on iPhone & iPad 9/28/2016 Deloitte Introduces New Apple Practice to Help Businesses Design & Implement iPhone & iPad Solutions CUPERTINO, Calif. & NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Apple® and Deloitte today announced a partnership to help companies quickly and easily transform the way they work by maximizing the power, ease-of-use and security the iOS platform brings to the workplace through iPhone® and iPad®. As part of the joint effort, Deloitte is creating a first-of-its-kind Apple practice with over 5,000 strategic advisors who are solely focused on helping businesses change the way they work across their entire enterprise, from customer-facing functions such as retail, field services and recruiting, to R&D, inventory management and back-office systems. This Smart News Release features multimedia. View the full release here: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160928006317/en/ Apple CEO Tim Cook and Deloitte Global CEO Punit Renjen meet at Apple's campus to Apple and Deloitte will also announce a joint effort to accelerate business transformation using iOS, iPhone & iPad. collaborate on the development (Courtesy of Apple/Roy Zipstein) of a new service offering from Deloitte Consulting called EnterpriseNext, designed to help clients fully take advantage of the iOS ecosystem of hardware, software and services in the workplace. The new offering will help customers discover the highest impact possibilities within their industries and quickly develop custom solutions through rapid prototyping. 1 “We know that iOS is the best mobile platform for business because we’ve experienced the benefit ourselves with over 100,000 iOS devices in use by Deloitte’s workforce, running 75 custom apps,” said Punit Renjen, CEO of Deloitte Global.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon's Antitrust Paradox
    LINA M. KHAN Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox abstract. Amazon is the titan of twenty-first century commerce. In addition to being a re- tailer, it is now a marketing platform, a delivery and logistics network, a payment service, a credit lender, an auction house, a major book publisher, a producer of television and films, a fashion designer, a hardware manufacturer, and a leading host of cloud server space. Although Amazon has clocked staggering growth, it generates meager profits, choosing to price below-cost and ex- pand widely instead. Through this strategy, the company has positioned itself at the center of e- commerce and now serves as essential infrastructure for a host of other businesses that depend upon it. Elements of the firm’s structure and conduct pose anticompetitive concerns—yet it has escaped antitrust scrutiny. This Note argues that the current framework in antitrust—specifically its pegging competi- tion to “consumer welfare,” defined as short-term price effects—is unequipped to capture the ar- chitecture of market power in the modern economy. We cannot cognize the potential harms to competition posed by Amazon’s dominance if we measure competition primarily through price and output. Specifically, current doctrine underappreciates the risk of predatory pricing and how integration across distinct business lines may prove anticompetitive. These concerns are height- ened in the context of online platforms for two reasons. First, the economics of platform markets create incentives for a company to pursue growth over profits, a strategy that investors have re- warded. Under these conditions, predatory pricing becomes highly rational—even as existing doctrine treats it as irrational and therefore implausible.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile LBS: Status Update & Platform Assessment
    Wireless Media Mobile LBS: Status Update & Platform Assessment Wireless Media Strategies (WMS) Report Snapshot This report provides Strategy Analytics’ high-level outlook for handset-based location-based services. Rising GPS penetration, the growing popularity of taxi- sharing, carpooling, and ride-sharing apps, third-party content integration into popular map applications, and the emerging wearables device category provide opportunities for growth and development in mobile LBS. This report also includes an update of our assessment of global location-platform leaders, HERE, Google, TomTom and Apple. November 2016 Nitesh Patel +441908423621 Tel: Email: [email protected] www.strategyanalytics.com Wireless Media Contents 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Key Trends in Mobile LBS 4 2.1 Reported Mobile LBS Use and Adoption 5 2.2 Mobile Maps & Direction Use in Context 6 2.3 Mobile Location Capability to Boost Emerging Market Opportunities 9 2.3.1 GPS handset penetration rises in the entry tier 9 2.4 New Trends in Urban Mobility 10 2.5 From Maps & Navigation to All-in-One Travel Planning Apps 11 2.6 Wearables Remain a Growth Opportunity 13 3. Location Platform Benchmark Update 16 3.1 Overall Assessment 21 Exhibits Exhibit 1: Overall Mobile Map & Directions Use in Context: Asia, Europe, and the US ............................................... 6 Exhibit 2: Regular Mobile Map & Directions Use in Context: Asia, Europe, and the US .............................................. 8 Exhibit 3: Mobile Map & Directions Use across All Countries ...................................................................................... 8 Exhibit 4 Rising Penetration of GPS Handsets by Price Tier ...................................................................................... 10 Exhibit 5 Global Wearable Device Sales by Type ...................................................................................................... 14 Exhibit 6 The Relative Strengths & Weaknesses of Major Location Platforms ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From Struggles to Stardom
    AAPL 175.01 Steve Jobs 12/21/17 $200.0 100.0 80.0 17 60.0 Apple co-founders 14 Steve Wozniak 40.0 and Steve Jobs 16 From Struggles 10 20.0 9 To Stardom Jobs returns Following its volatile 11 10.0 8.0 early years, Apple has 12 enjoyed a prolonged 6.0 period of earnings 15 and stock market 5 4.0 gains. 2 7 2.0 1.0 1 0.8 4 13 1 6 0.6 8 0.4 0.2 3 Chart shown in logarithmic scale Tim Cook 0.1 1980 ’82 ’84 ’86’88 ’90 ’92 ’94 ’96 ’98 ’00 ’02 ’04 ’06’08 ’10 ’12 ’14 ’16 2018 Source: FactSet Dec. 12, 1980 (1) 1984 (3) 1993 (5) 1998 (8) 2003 2007 (12) 2011 2015 (16) Apple, best known The Macintosh computer Newton, a personal digital Apple debuts the iMac, an The iTunes store launches. Jobs announces the iPhone. Apple becomes the most valuable Apple Music, a subscription for the Apple II home launches, two days after assistant, launches, and flops. all-in-one desktop computer 2004-’05 (10) Apple releases the Apple TV publicly traded company, passing streaming service, launches. and iPod Touch, and changes its computer, goes public. Apple’s iconic 1984 1995 (6) with a colorful, translucent Apple unveils the iPod Mini, Exxon Mobil. Apple introduces 2017 (17 ) name from Apple Computer. Shares rise more than Super Bowl commercial. Microsoft introduces Windows body designed by Jony Ive. Shuffle, and Nano. the iPhone 4S with Siri. Tim Cook Introduction of the iPhone X.
    [Show full text]
  • The Department of Justice Versus Apple Inc. -- the Great Encryption Debate Between Privacy and National Security
    Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology Volume 27 Issue 2 Spring 2019 Article 3 2019 The Department of Justice Versus Apple Inc. -- The Great Encryption Debate Between Privacy and National Security Julia P. Eckart Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/jlt Part of the Communications Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Other Law Commons, Privacy Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Julia P. Eckart, The Department of Justice Versus Apple Inc. -- The Great Encryption Debate Between Privacy and National Security, 27 Cath. U. J. L. & Tech 1 (2019). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/jlt/vol27/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE VERSUS APPLE INC.—THE GREAT ENCRYPTION DEBATE BETWEEN PRIVACY AND NATIONAL SECURITY Julia P. Eckart* I. THE FACTS UNDERLYING THE DOJ–APPLE DISPUTE ........................3 A. Timeline of the Parties’ Court-Filed Documents ......................................6 B. Issues Presented in the DOJ–Apple Litigation ..........................................8 II. APPLE’S iOS9.0 SECURITY GUIDE ..........................................................9 A. Some of Apple’s Encryption and Non-Encryption Security Features ........9 B. Other Hardware and Software System Security Features .......................11 III. DOES THIS CASE PERTAIN TO A SINGLE IPHONE OR ALL IPHONES? .......................................................................................................12 A. DOJ’s Position—It is About One, Single iPhone ....................................12 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Responses and Countermeasures to National Security Letters
    Washington University Journal of Law & Policy Volume 47 Intellectual Property: From Biodiversity to Technical Standards 2015 Legal Responses and Countermeasures to National Security Letters Brett Weinstein Washington University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy Part of the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Brett Weinstein, Legal Responses and Countermeasures to National Security Letters, 47 WASH. U. J. L. & POL’Y 217 (2015), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol47/iss1/15 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Journal of Law & Policy by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Legal Responses and Countermeasures to National Security Letters Brett Weinstein INTRODUCTION In early June of 2013, governmental surveillance suddenly and dramatically entered the public consciousness, prompting a torrent of debate and backlash. The Guardian published a top secret court order requiring Verizon to hand over all telephone call records to the National Security Agency (NSA); the Washington Post disclosed a secret but widespread Internet surveillance program, and months of similar revelations followed, all stemming from leaks by former NSA contractor, Edward Snowden.1 As a result, the public and the press began to question the tools that the government uses for surveillance, including National Security Letters (NSLs), and the relationship between the government and the technology and telecommunications companies that seemingly possess all personal and private information generated in the modern, digital world.2 J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetizing Car Data New Service Business Opportunities to Create New Customer Benefits
    Monetizing car data New service business opportunities to create new customer benefits Advanced Industries September 2016 Foreword As privately owned vehicles become increasingly connected to each other and to external infrastructures via a growing number of sensors, a massive amount of data is being gener- ated. Gathering this data has become par for the course; leveraging insights from data in ways that can monetize it, however, is still in its nascent stages. To answer key questions around car data monetization and to understand how players along the connected car value chain might capture this potential, McKinsey & Company launched a large-scale, multimodality knowledge initiative course of research: Roundtable sessions conducted in Germany and the USA convened leaders from the automotive (OEMs, suppliers, sales), high-tech, insurance, telecommunications, and finance sectors. Surveys administered in China, Germany, and the USA assessed the preferences, trends, and concerns of about 3,000 customers regarding car data. One-on-one interviews explored the perspectives of car data leaders on the trends and monetization matters in the space. “Customer clinics” collected user observations around preferences and attitudes towards the practicality of various car connectivity features and services. A model was developed to quantify the overall revenue pool related to car data and the opportunity for key industry players based on selected, prioritized use cases. In the following you will find a synthesis of the key findings of this broad, ongoing knowl- edge effort. We would like to thank the many organizations that participated in this exploration of the potential and requirements of car data monetization and that through their contributions made this effort possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Didi's COVID-19 Relief Efforts
    DiDi's COVID-19 Relief Efforts Shuai Ren DiDi Chuxing DiDi’s Relief Efforts During the Outbreak Towards Post-Pandemic Dedicated Fleets for Healthcare Workers Point-to-Point: Commuter Bus and DRT Installing In-Vehicle Plastic Protective Sheets DiDi Hitch – Ride with Coworker Introducing AI to Verify Mask-Wearing DiDi Bike - 12 Days of Free Services “Transit Occupancy Alerting" System Joined City Consumer Voucher Plans Global Efforts to Combat COVID-19 Urban Traffic Activity Index Dedicated Fleets for Healthcare Workers 2020.1.23-24 2020.1.27 2020.2.1 2020.3 DiDi drivers organized to 2000+ healthcare Launched fund for special fleets, Launched sanitation stations operate multiple workers can call protective supplies and financial in close to 200 cities in China. emergency fleets online assistance for DPs. 2020.1.21 2020.1.25 2020.1.28 2020.2.3 COVID-19 task force Launched free services Launched free services Launched free services created for healthcare workers in for healthcare workers in for healthcare workers in Wuhan Shanghai Beijing Installing In-Vehicle Plastic Protective Sheets 2020.2.18, DiDi announced to install in-vehicle plastic protective sheets for DiDi’s car-hailing services all over the country, in order to prevent the spread of droplets as much as possible. Introducing AI to Verify Mask-Wearing AI technology to verify whether drivers are wearing masks. Driver partners who fail to follow safety requirements may not be permitted to provide rides to users through the platform. Technology advantages Accurate Multiple Steady Real-time Verification Adapt to various identification accuracy up to complex scenes and support for 99% in practice high concurrent commitment “Transit Occupancy Alerting" System DiDi's Smart Transportation Brain Team provided Shenzhen Bus Group with basic capabilities such as big data platform construction as well as application modeling and analysis, and helped it quickly build a “Transit Occupancy Alerting" system to ensure enough distance between passengers on buses.
    [Show full text]
  • Secrets at Apple's Core [Entire Talk]
    Stanford eCorner Secrets at Apple's Core [Entire Talk] Adam Lashinsky, Author May 23, 2012 Video URL: http://ecorner.stanford.edu/videos/2973/Secrets-at-Apples-Core-Entire-Talk Adam Lashinsky, Fortune senior editor-at-large, shares an insider look at Apple, one of the world's most iconic and secretive companies. Based on his research into the technology giant's internal processes and approaches to leadership and building products, Lashinsky offers insights and surprises from his book, Inside Apple: How America's Most Admired--and Secretive-- Company Really Works. Transcript Almost exactly a year-ago this week I published an article in Fortune magazine with the same title as you see in front of you, Inside Apple. We decided at Fortune that in Apple we had a company that the entire world thought they knew a lot about because the world knew about Apple's products. And they knew about Apple's advertising and its image and its brand and its logo and so on. When in fact the world knew and really still does know very little about how Apple does what it does, what goes on inside Apple? There is a reason for that and it's a major part of my thesis and what I've learned in researching this company intensely over the last year and that is that Apple doesn't want us to know what goes on inside Apple. Apple is professionally focused on telling us, telling you about its products. Not about it. As a business journalist, my job is not to be concerned with what Apple is interested in us knowing, but what my readers at Fortune magazine ought to know and want to know.
    [Show full text]
  • FBI–Apple Encryption Dispute - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 6/2/16, 6:59 AM
    FBI–Apple encryption dispute - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 6/2/16, 6:59 AM FBI–Apple encryption dispute From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The FBI–Apple encryption dispute concerns whether and to what extent courts in the United States can compel manufacturers to assist in unlocking cell phones whose contents are cryptographically protected.[1] There is much debate over public access to strong encryption.[2] In 2015 and 2016, Apple Inc. has received and objected to or challenged at least 11 orders issued by United States district courts under the All Writs Act of 1789. Most of these seek to compel Apple "to use its existing capabilities to extract data like contacts, photos and calls from locked iPhones running on operating systems iOS 7 and older" in order to assist in criminal investigations and prosecutions. A few requests, however, involve phones with more extensive security protections, which Apple has no current ability to break. These orders would compel Apple to write new software that would let the government bypass these device's security and unlock the phones.[3] The most well-known instance of the latter category was a February 2016 court case in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The FBI wanted Apple to create and electronically An iPhone 5C, the model used by one sign new software that would enable the FBI to unlock a work-issued of the perpetrators of the 2015 San iPhone 5C it recovered from one of the shooters in a December 2015 Bernardino attack terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California, that killed 14 people and injured 22.
    [Show full text]
  • Uber-Technologies-Inc-2019-Annual-Report.Pdf
    2019 Annual Report 69 Countries A global tech platform at 10K+ massive scale Cities Serving multiple multi-trillion dollar markets with products leveraging our core technology $65B and infrastructure Gross Bookings We believe deeply in our bold mission. Every minute of every day, consumers and Drivers on our platform can tap a button and get a ride or tap a button and get work. We revolutionized personal mobility with ridesharing, and we are leveraging our platform to redefine the massive meal delivery and logistics 111M industries. The foundation of our platform is our MAPCs massive network, leading technology, operational excellence, and product expertise. Together, these elements power movement from point A to point B. 7B Trips UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-38902 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 45-2647441 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 1455 Market Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, California 94103 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (415) 612-8582 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of each exchange Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) on which registered Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share UBER New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Court-Ordered Access to Smart Phones: in Brief
    Court-Ordered Access to Smart Phones: In Brief Kristin Finklea Specialist in Domestic Security Richard M. Thompson II Legislative Attorney Chris Jaikaran Analyst in Cybersecurity Policy February 23, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44396 Court-Ordered Access to Smart Phones: In Brief Summary The tension between the benefits and challenges of encryption has been an issue for law enforcement and policymakers since the 1990s, and was reinvigorated in 2014 when companies like Apple and Google implemented automatic enhanced encryption on mobile devices and certain communications systems. Companies using such strong encryption do not maintain “back door” keys and, therefore, now cannot easily unlock, or decrypt, the devices—not even when presented with a valid legal order. Law enforcement concerns about the lack of back door keys were highlighted by the November and December 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France, and San Bernardino, CA. Questions arose as to whether the attackers used strong encryption and, more importantly, if they did, whether and how this might have hindered investigations. Following the December 2, 2015, terrorist attack in San Bernardino, CA,, U.S. investigators recovered a cell phone reportedly used by one of the shooters. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James B. Comey testified before Congress two months later, indicating that the Bureau was still unable to access the information on that device. On February 16, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ordered Apple to provide “reasonable technical assistance to assist law enforcement agents in obtaining access to the data” on the cell phone.
    [Show full text]