DOCSLIB.ORG

Response of the Lake Crescent and Lake Sorell Ecosystems to Water Level Variability During 2009: a Period of Drought and Post-Drought Recovery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Wat er Assessment Aquatic Ecology Report Series Response of the Lake Crescent and Lake Sorell ecosystems to water level variability during 2009: a period of drought and post- drought recovery October 2010 ISSN: 1835-9523 Report No. WA 10/01 Water Assessment Branch W at er and Marine Resources Division D e p a r t m ent of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Copyright Notice: Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer: Whilst DPIPWE has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Preferred Citation: DPIPWE (2010). Response of the Lake Crescent and Lake Sorell ecosystems to water level variability during 2009: a period of drought and post-drought recovery. Water Assessment Aquatic Ecology Report Series, Report No. WA 10/01. Water and Marine Resources Division. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart, Tasmania. Contact Details: Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Water Assessment 13 St Johns Avenue, New Town Phone: 03 6233 6833 Web: www.dpiw.tas.gov.au Email: [email protected] Cover Page Images: Top left: Lake Crescent from Tea Tree Point boat ramp, April 2009; top right: Boathouse Shore, Lake Crescent, May 2009; bottom left: Clyde Marsh, November 2009; bottom right: Sexually mature female golden galaxias (Galaxias auratus) from Lake Sorell, July 2009. The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment provides leadership in the sustainable management and development of Tasmania’s resources. The Mission of the Department is to advance Tasmania’s prosperity through the sustainable development of our natural resources and the conservation of our natural and cultural heritage for the future. The Water and Marine Resources Division provides a focus for water management and water development in Tasmania through a diverse range of functions including the design of policy and regulatory frameworks to ensure sustainable use of the surface water and groundwater resources; monitoring, assessment and reporting on the condition of the State’s freshwater resources; facilitation of infrastructure development projects to ensure the efficient and sustainable supply of water; and implementation of the Water Management Act 1999, related legislation and the State Water Development Plan. Response of Lake Crescent and Lake Sorell to water level variability during 2009 Summary The interconnected Lake Crescent and Lake Sorell are impounded natural lakes which are located 1 km apart in the upper reaches of the Clyde River catchment (~800 m a.s.l.) in the south-east of the Tasmanian Central Plateau. This lake system contains several distinctive and significant environmental values, including extensive littoral wetlands (one of which is Ramsar-listed), and the freshwater fish golden galaxias (Galaxias auratus Johnston) which is endemic to lakes Crescent and Sorell and listed under Tasmanian and Commonwealth threatened species legislation. Because of these and other environmental values, and their shallow and highly productive states, lakes Crescent and Sorell are considered to be a regionally unique lake system. Between 2000 and 2008, a substantial volume of scientific work was undertaken to examine the influences of low water levels and patterns of water level fluctuations on the Crescent-Sorell ecosystem. This work showed that these components of the hydrological regime of this system directly and indirectly affect three broad aspects of the Crescent-Sorell ecosystem: (1) important aquatic habitats (i.e. wetlands and rocky shores), (2) water quality, and (3) G. auratus populations. The findings of studies during 2000-2003 were used to guide the formulation of water level operating rules in the water management plan (WMP) for lakes Crescent and Sorell, which took effect in November 2005. Since the late 1990s, the Crescent-Sorell ecosystem has been severely stressed by prolonged periods of low water levels, which have been primarily caused by below average and unseasonal rainfall (including significant El Niño-induced drought events). While there was a slight increase in water levels in both lakes during 2003-2005, between 2007 – early 2009, water levels fell substantially in both lakes. These low water levels were thought to have the potential to further degrade water quality and habitats in the lakes, and cause additional declines in G. auratus populations. This study took advantage of a unique opportunity to examine several components of the Crescent- Sorell ecosystem during a period (i.e. 2009 – early 2010) of extreme water level variation, which included very low water levels in summer-autumn 2009, followed by rapid and substantial seasonal rises in levels during winter-spring 2009. These conditions also provided quite different circumstances to undertake the second environmental water level manipulation in this lake system; with the first being undertaken in 2007 when water level minima were higher and only moderate natural seasonal rises in levels occurred in Lake Crescent and Lake Sorell. Similar to during 2007, during 2009 the response of G. auratus populations (at several life stages) in Lake Crescent and Lake Sorell to the water level manipulation was monitored. Using long-term data sets, which included data collected during the present study, several previously established correlations and relationships between water levels and parameters of the Crescent-Sorell ecosystem were re- i Response of Lake Crescent and Lake Sorell to water level variability during 2009 examined. Furthermore, the resistance/resilience of some environmental values in lakes Crescent and Sorell in relation to impacts of low water levels and recovery during a period of substantial rises in levels was investigated. This study confirmed many findings from previous studies in lakes Crescent and Sorell. It also provided new information in some areas which is highly relevant to the management of water levels in these lakes, and hence water resources in the Clyde River catchment. Principally, this study furthered understanding of: (1) water level patterns in Lake Crescent and Lake Sorell, (2) the effects of water levels on water quality and the ecosystems of these lakes, (3) relationships between water levels and the inundation and condition of littoral habitats in these lakes, (4) the spawning strategy of G. auratus, (5) relationships between water levels and the abundance of juvenile G. auratus, (6) the status of G. auratus populations, and (7) the environmental benefits of water level manipulations in these lakes. Based on the findings of the present study and previous studies, components of the water level regimes of Lake Crescent and Lake Sorell which are important to the management of their ecosystems were synthesized. In this synthesis, water level thresholds which related to: (1) the inundation of important littoral habitats (rocky shores and wetlands) in Lake Crescent and Lake Sorell, (2) maintaining water quality (particularly low turbidity levels) in Lake Crescent and Lake Sorell, and (3) allowing mass spawning of the G. auratus population in Lake Crescent, were identified. Furthermore, the importance of maintaining water level fluctuations in lakes Crescent and Sorell that follow historical seasonal patterns (which relate to climatic conditions in the area) is also specified. Based on this synthesis, to sustainably manage the Crescent-Sorell ecosystem it is recommended that the: Critical minimal operating water level in Lake Crescent is 802.200 m AHD Critical minimal operating water level in Lake Sorell is 803.200 m AHD Preferred minimum operating water level in Lake Crescent is 802.700 m AHD Preferred minimum operating water level in Lake Sorell is 803.500 m AHD Preferred operating range for water levels in Lake Crescent is 802.200-803.800 m AHD Preferred operating range for water levels in Lake Sorell is 803.500-804.360 m AHD. The findings of the present study, and those of DPIW (2008), have demonstrated that appropriately timed releases of water from Lake Sorell to Lake Crescent can be used to manage the Crescent- Sorell ecosystem. This innovative approach has been trialled twice, under quite different water level conditions in these lakes, and positive responses in environmental parameters in the system on both occasions show that it provides a powerful tool for managing these lakes. Therefore, additional to the environmentally important components of the water level regimes of lakes Crescent and ii Response of Lake
Recommended publications
  • Derwent Catchment Review

    Derwent Catchment Review

    Derwent Catchment Review PART 1 Introduction and Background Prepared for Derwent Catchment Review Steering Committee June, 2011 By Ruth Eriksen, Lois Koehnken, Alistair Brooks and Daniel Ray Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Scope and Need....................................................................................................1 2 Physical setting......................................................................................................................................1 2.1 Catchment description......................................................................................................2 2.2 Geology and Geomorphology ...........................................................................................5 2.3 Rainfall and climate...........................................................................................................9 2.3.1 Current climate ............................................................................................................9 2.3.2 Future climate............................................................................................................10 2.4 Vegetation patterns ........................................................................................................12 2.5 River hydrology ...............................................................................................................12 2.5.1
  • Lake Margaret Power Scheme a Conservation Management Plan

    Lake Margaret Power Scheme a Conservation Management Plan

    Lake Margaret Power Scheme A Conservation Management Plan Volume 1 March 2006 Paul Davies Pty Ltd Architects Heritage Consultants Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 How to Use the Plan....................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Limitations ...................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Authors ........................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Acknowledgments .......................................................................... 2 1.1.5 Identification of the Place ............................................................... 3 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND........................................................................... 6 2.1 Preface....................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Summary History........................................................................................ 6 2.3 Major Stages of Development of the site ................................................... 7 2.4 Development of the Power Station Building............................................
  • Byard, Southern Tasmanian Licensed Anglers' Association, Was Called, Made the Statutory Declaration and Was Examined

    Byard, Southern Tasmanian Licensed Anglers' Association, Was Called, Made the Statutory Declaration and Was Examined

    THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL SELECT COMMITTEE ON CLYDE RIVER WATER MET IN COMMITTEE ROOM 2, PARLIAMENT HOUSE, HOBART ON WEDNESDAY 11 AUGUST 2004. Mr TERRY BYARD, SOUTHERN TASMANIAN LICENSED ANGLERS' ASSOCIATION, WAS CALLED, MADE THE STATUTORY DECLARATION AND WAS EXAMINED. CHAIR (Mr Hall) - Good morning, Mr Byard. We have your submission, thank you very much. Is there anything you would like to that? Mr BYARD - Thank you, Mr Chairman. Certainly there are a couple of things I would like to say. I would like to thank the committee for giving us the opportunity to make the presentation here today. You might ask what a bunch of anglers is doing involving itself in this sort of rather complex issue and it is probably a good question but I suppose the heart of the answer to that lies in the fact that in part this issue deals with an area which is very significant to anglers in as much that both lakes Sorell and Crescent and the Clyde over time have been a very popular angling destination and also we have seen in more recent years a very significant decline in both the lakes and the river. We have Lake Crescent which has been infested, unfortunately, by carp, with one issue of decline there in the lakes. We have also seen a major water quality decline in Lake Sorell since around about the late 1990s and 2000. We also have seen a decline in the Clyde River as a fishery, which I will comment on a bit later. The association, because of its involvement and commitment to this sort of area, decided that we ought to be involved in the overall water management process which is articulated through the Government's new water management legislation and which calls for the development of water management plans right across the State in a whole range of systems and catchments.
  • INTERLAKEN LAKESIDE RESERVE Interlaken Lakeside

    INTERLAKEN LAKESIDE RESERVE Interlaken Lakeside

    INTERLAKEN LAKESIDE RESERVE 2016 Interlaken Lakeside Reserve is a wetland of international significance and one of four Ramsar sites in Southern Tasmania Interlaken Lakeside Reserve –T. Clements, (top photo) Golden galaxias (Galaxias auratus) –J. Patil photo) (top Clements, Reserve –T. Lakeside Interlaken www.nrmsouth.org.au Located 20 km west of Tunbridge on the eastern edge of the Central Highlands the Ramsar-listed Interlaken Lakeside Reserve lies on the north-western corner of Lake Crescent. It is one of six large wetlands that are a unique feature of the Lake Crescent – Sorell system. It is home to the rare golden galaxias fish and a diverse algae Robertsons (phytoplankton) community. Marsh Ramsar values In 1982, the Interlaken Lakeside LAKE SRELL Reserve was listed as a wetland Silver of international significance Plains under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. It was recognised because it met a number of criteria, including being a valuable regional representation Kemps Marsh Kermodes Dago Point of permanent freshwater lakes and Bay seasonal freshwater marshes. It also Interlaken Road supports the endangered golden galaxias (Galaxias auratus) fish which is found only Tunbridge Tier Road in Lakes Crescent and Sorell and their associated streams and wetlands. Interlaken Road DID YOU KNOW? The Ramsar LAKE Convention is an international treaty CRESCENT for the conservation and sustainable Blak Snake Road use of wetlands. It was named after Denniston Road the city of Ramsar in Iran, where the Interlaken Ramsar Site Convention was signed in 1971. Reserves Wetlands 1 0 1 2 km INTERLAKEN RAMSAR SITE Robertsons Marsh Management Responsibility LAKE SRELL The land within the Interlaken Silver Ramsar site is mostly Crown land, Plains with a number of small privately owned parcels of land.
  • Hobart Derwent Bridge

    Hobart Derwent Bridge

    LSC DH NF LSC LSC TW BO NN DONAGHYS HILL LOOKOUT NELSON FALLS NATURE TRAIL LAKE ST CLAIR THE WALL BOTHWELL Pause for a break on the road and take the Stretch your legs and make the short climb to Australia’s deepest lake was carved out by glaciers. It’s the end This large-scale artwork is lifetime’s work for self- Established in the 1820s by settler-graziers from Scotland easy walk to a lookout point over buttongrass see a rainforest cascade. point of the famous Overland Track, one of the world’s best multi- taught sculptor Greg Duncan, who is carving the stories (with some notable Welsh and Irish connections) this town plains to see a bend of the upper Franklin day walks. Spend an hour or so in the Lake St Clair Park Centre, of the high country in 100 panels of Huon pine, each has more than 50 heritage-listed buildings. It is the site River – on the skyline is the white quartzite where you’ll learn about the region’s amazing geology, fascinating three metres high and a metre wide. of Australia’s oldest golf course, on the historic property summit of Frenchmans Cap. Lake Burbury flora & fauna and rich human heritage. ‘Ratho’. ‘Nant’ is another of the town’s heritage properties TO THE WEST: explore wilderness, Lake St Clair and the source of acclaimed single-malt whisky. TO THE EAST: follow the Derwent Queenstown QU Nelson Falls discover wild history LH NF Nature Trail LSC down to a city by the sea THE WALL Bronte Park THE LYELL HIGHWAY WR Derwent Bridge TW Linking the West Coast with Hobart, the highway you’re on ST crosses the high country of the Central Plateau and runs Strahan through the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area.
  • Western Lakes Fishery Management Plan 2002

    Western Lakes Fishery Management Plan 2002

    Wilderness Fishery Western Lakes Western November 2002 F ISHERY M ANAGEMENT P LAN WESTERN LAKES WESTERN LAKES F ISHERY M ANAGEMENT P LAN November 2002 November 2002 Western Lakes – Fishery Management Plan Western Lakes – Fishery Management Plan November 2002 Executive Summary Introduction This fishery management plan is a subsidiary plan under the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan (WHA plan). The plan covers all areas of responsibility for which the Inland Fisheries Service (IFS) has statutory control; freshwater native species, freshwater recreational fisheries, and freshwater commercial fisheries. The plan also makes several recommendations on land management issues for consideration by the Parks and Wildlife Service (PWS). The area covered by the plan includes the Central Plateau Conservation Area west of the Lake Highway and the Walls of Jerusalem National Park, both of which lie within the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Environment This section examines the impacts of users (primarily anglers) on the environment and specifically water quality, and how these impacts can be minimised while maintaining angling opportunities. Management prescriptions focus on monitoring and review of water quality and the impacts of boating, wading and weir construction in various waters, and where necessary, implementing remediation measures. An information and education approach with the particular emphasis on the use of signage, will play an important role. Establishment of alternative boating access outside of the Western Lakes, development of a boating code of practice and review of current boating regulations will assist in minimising boating impacts. Additionally, the IFS will encourage and support studies that examine the impacts of boating and wading.
  • Byes Hut Management Plan

    Byes Hut Management Plan

    BYE’S HOUSE, GREAT LAKE Historic Heritage Plan of Management Final Report prepared for Hydro Tasmania Consulting 20 December 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1 CLIENT AND PROJECT DETAILS ................................................................................................................4 1.2 AUTHORSHIP..........................................................................................................................................4 1.3 APPROACH ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 DISCLAIMER........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 HERITAGE REVIEW .................................................................................................. 6 2.1 GENERIC COVENANT V3 03 OCT 2006 ...................................................................................................6 2.2 NATURE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT V3 TEMPLATE.............................................................................6 3.0 ILLUSTRATED HISTORICAL
  • Freshwater Systems Between 1997 and 2002, with the Addition of New Observations

    Freshwater Systems Between 1997 and 2002, with the Addition of New Observations

    Status of Trout-free Waters in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Report to Department of Primary Industries, and Water, Hobart. PE Davies, LSJ Cook, WR Robinson, T Sloane June 2009 82 Waimea Ave, Sandy Bay, FFrreesshhwwaatteerr Tasmania Australia 7005 Ph/Fax: 03 62254660 SSyysstteemmss [email protected] Aquatiic Enviironmentall Consulltiing Serviice Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 5 1. Aims and Background ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Aims ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Alien fish in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area .................................................. 6 1.3 Brown trout ............................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Value of trout-free waters ........................................................................................................ 8 2. Mapping the Distribution of Trout-free Waters ........................................................................... 10 2.1 Fish distribution database ......................................................................................................
  • Shannon River

    Shannon River

    Shannon River WATER MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 2018 September 2018 Overview The Shannon River Catchment Water Management Statement sets out how water resources in the Shannon River catchment (below Great Lake Dam at Miena) are allocated and the rules for taking water. This Statement explains the water management arrangements in the catchment that support the objectives of the Water Management Act 1999 (the Act) and are consistent with the planning principles of the National Water Initiative as administered by the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (the Department). The Shannon River catchment (from Shannon Lagoon to the confluence with the Ouse River downstream of Hermitage) has an approximate area of 424 km2. It is a sub- catchment of the Greater Derwent catchment, which drains part of the Central Plateau. Water and Marine Resources Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Water Management Outcomes Water Managers The outcomes sought through the implementation The Department manages water extraction from of the described water management arrangements the Shannon River and its tributaries primarily in this Statement meet the objectives of the Act. through water licences issued under the Act. This will protect water availability for commercial users (i.e. for consumptive use), while ensuring The Shannon Catchment sits within the River town water supply, stock and domestic, and Shannon and Lower River Derwent Hydro-Electric environmental water needs are met. Water Districts. These two districts are administered by Hydro Tasmania. River Characteristics Hydro Tasmania manages Shannon Lagoon for Flows in the catchment have been modified since power generation at Poatina Power Station by the early 1900s when the Waddamana power pumping water into yingina/Great Lake.
  • OVERLAND TRACK TOUR GRADE: Well Defined and Wide Tracks on Easy to WORLD HERITAGE AREA Moderate Terrain, in Slightly Modified Natural Environments

    OVERLAND TRACK TOUR GRADE: Well Defined and Wide Tracks on Easy to WORLD HERITAGE AREA Moderate Terrain, in Slightly Modified Natural Environments

    FACTSHEET DURATION: 6 days OVERLAND TRACK TOUR GRADE: Well defined and wide tracks on easy to WORLD HERITAGE AREA moderate terrain, in slightly modified natural environments. You will require a modest level of fitness. Recommended for beginners. CRADLE MOUNTAIN – LAKE ST CLAIR NATIONAL PARK The world renowned Overland Track is usually included in any list of the world’s great walks, and justifiably so. It showcases the highlights of Tasmania’s spectacular landforms and flora in a memorable 80km trek from Lake St Clair to Cradle Mountain. Discover glacial remnants of cirques, lakes and tarns; temperate rainforests of myrtle beech and sassafras, laurel and leatherwood; jagged mountain peaks of fluted dolerite columns (including Tasmania’s highest – Mt Ossa at 1617m); stark alpine moorlands and deep gorges and waterfalls. In the peak season, our tour starts at Dove Lake below the dramatic Cradle Mountain and finishes at Cynthia Bay on Lake St Clair, a glacial lake 220m deep, 14km long. At other times, we start at Lake St Clair and finish at Cradle Mountain, and spend a night in Pine Valley as an early side-trip on the way to Windy Ridge and a day base-camping at Waterfall Valley. ITINERARY & TOUR DESCRIPTION Day 1: the glacially formed lakes and tarns, This is alpine Tasmania at its best, BCT to Cradle Valley and then continue on to Kitchen Hut and you will long retain vivid and Waterfall Valley from where we have the opportunity memories of this marvellous area. We make an early start from BCT and to scramble up the dolerite of Cradle travel to Cradle Valley via the bleak Mountain (1545m).
  • The Vegetation Communities Dry Eucalypt Forest and Woodland

    The Vegetation Communities Dry Eucalypt Forest and Woodland

    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Dry eucalypt forest and woodland Eucalyptus amygdalina Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Dry eucalypt forest and woodland Community (Code) Page Eucalyptus amygdalina coastal forest and woodland (DAC) 11 Eucalyptus amygdalina forest and woodland on dolerite (DAD) 13 Eucalyptus amygdalina forest and woodland on sandstone (DAS) 15 Eucalyptus amygdalina forest on mudstone (DAM) 17 Eucalyptus amygdalina inland forest and woodland on Cainozoic deposits (DAZ) 19 Eucalyptus amygdalina–Eucalyptus obliqua damp sclerophyll forest (DSC) 22 Eucalyptus barberi forest and woodland (DBA) 24 Eucalyptus coccifera forest and woodland (DCO) 25 Eucalyptus cordata forest (DCR) 27 Eucalyptus dalrympleana–Eucalyptus pauciflora forest and woodland (DDP) 29 Eucalyptus delegatensis dry forest and woodland (DDE) 31 Eucalyptus globulus dry forest and woodland (DGL) 33 Eucalyptus gunnii woodland (DGW) 35 Eucalyptus morrisbyi forest and woodland (DMO) 37 Eucalyptus nitida dry forest and woodland (DNI) 39 Eucalyptus nitida Furneaux forest (DNF) 41 Eucalyptus obliqua dry forest (DOB) 43 Eucalyptus ovata forest and woodland (DOV) 45 Eucalyptus ovata heathy woodland (DOW) 48 Eucalyptus pauciflora forest and woodland not on dolerite (DPO) 50 Eucalyptus pauciflora forest and woodland on dolerite (DPD) 52 Eucalyptus perriniana forest and woodland (DPE) 54 Eucalyptus pulchella forest and woodland (DPU) 56 Eucalyptus risdonii forest and woodland (DRI) 58 Eucalyptus rodwayi forest and woodland (DRO) 60 Eucalyptus
  • Yingina/Great Lake Catchment Is Supplemented by Diversions from the Ouse River in the West and from Yingina/Great Lake Arthur’S Lake in the East

    Yingina/Great Lake Catchment Is Supplemented by Diversions from the Ouse River in the West and from Yingina/Great Lake Arthur’S Lake in the East

    EDITION 5 Hydro Generation The yingina/Great Lake catchment is supplemented by diversions from the Ouse River in the west and from yingina/Great Lake Arthur’s Lake in the east. Augusta Dam stores the headwaters of the Ouse River; the outflow is picked up a few kilometres down the river and conveyed to the lake Anglers via Liawenee Canal. Water from the lake flows through a 5.7 km long headrace tunnel situated beneath the Great Western Tiers, down a 2.7 km long penstock and a 110 m Access deep vertical shaft into an underground power station at Poatina. REGION: CENTRAL Poatina is Tasmania’s second largest power station comprising five 51.6 MW and one 54.5 MW turbines operating under a head of 835 metres and produces approximately 12% of Hydro Tasmanian’s hydro generation capacity. Sheree Chisholm Native Fish Management Four species of native fish are present in the lake, including the Great Lake paragalaxias and the Shannon paragalaxias, both listed under Commonwealth and State legislation as threatened. The IFS and Hydro Tasmania are working to conserve these threatened species and their habitats. The other two species, the spotted and climbing galaxias are common and widespread within the State. Water Level Management Numerous activities are undertaken to manage water levels at yingina/Great Lake. The optimum operating level set down by Hydro Tasmania, rainfall conditions permitting, is between 30% and 60% of Full Supply Level (FSL). This is designed to accommodate the needs of hydro power generation, recreational use, irrigation releases and ecological sustainability. Water quality and the Charophyte weed beds are regularly monitored to assess any changes CONTACT DETAILS in condition.