DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Resident Submissions to the Leicestershire County Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Resident Submissions to the Leicestershire County Council Electoral Review Local resident submissions to the Leicestershire County Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from local residents. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Leicestershire County Personal Details: Name: Ros Aldwinckle E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Having lived in oadby for almost all my life and watched it change dramatically I do not see why the area I live in should be linked with wigston. Surely Oadby could simply split into two parts with two councillors leaving wigston out of it. That way we would be represented truly locally. I for one object to the new proposed boundary change but agree to less councillors being needed. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/6247 02/12/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Leicestershire County Personal Details: Name: E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I fully object to this going ahead. We bought a property in Syston as Syston is where we wanted to live. If we had wanted to live in thurmaston we would have done so and also would have got a property in that area cheaper. With this change if will affect my family expenditure due to insurance payments etc. Please take note in looking at the current thurmaston area in making it better and having it being busier with the additional 5000 homes being built soon. This is unfair on residents and the change doesn't need to take place. Thanks Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/6551 08/01/2016 The Review Officer (Leicestershire) Local Government Boundary Commission for England 14th Floor, Millbank Tower Millbank London SW1P 4QP 9.1.16 Dear Mr D.Owen, Having studied your literature on the boundary review of Leicestershire County Divisions, we would like you to add our objection to your proposal of including the South part of Syston in the Thurmaston Ridgmere Divison. We would like to base our argument around your notes that states, ‘This part of Syston is contiguous with, and of similar character to, the part of Thurmaston Parish also served by Melton Road’. We would like to draw your attention to the following considerations, which we feel contradict this reasoning. We hope to use statements from your own criteria to justify our arguments. 1. Identifiable Boundaries- In your statement you say that major roads form well know barriers between communities. With regards to Melton Road, it forms 5 well known distinctive barriers, at Suburban Rearsby, Queniborough, Syston, Thurmaston and Leicester City which the communities of Leicestershire are very familiar with. Each part has its own well defined characteristics and therefore, the South part of Syston of Melton Road, does not have a similar character to Thurmaston. Furthermore, Thurmaston part is recommended for regeneration by the Borough Council, due to the negative impact after the By Pass was built, which divides the Thurmaston Community. 2. Legislation 2 regarding the estimated changes in the number of distribution of electors likely to take place of a five year period from the date of our final recommendation.- The Borough Council have given planning approval for the building of 3,500 houses, rising to 4,500 based on their Core Strategy. This will add a significant amount of electors in the intended Thurmaston Ridgemere ward. Therefore your proposal to add approx. 206 houses will have no significant effect on the distribution of electors. This development is also identifying a relief road cutting Thurmaston and Syston after Simpson Close through the fields of Roundhill Academy. If your proposed changes occur, this will cut off the South part of Syston from Thurmaston and isolating it from the rest of Syston. This will have a detrimental effect, similar to when the By Pass was built in Thurmaston. 3. Facilities– Your criteria states that the location of public facilities can represent the centre point of a community. –The centre points of Syston are: the fantastic medical centre, the South Charnwood Leisure Centre, the key supermarkets: Coop, Tesco and Aldi, religious establishments and its vibrant Town centre. The people of Syston identify with these facilities more than the purpose built shopping centre in Thurmaston. The shops in Syston provide a sense of community spirit. Many residents from the South of Syston have been resident here for a considerable length of time and many have moved from Thurmaston to Syston, to enjoy the Syston facilities and have a distinctive way of life. 4. Community groups-The residents of this part of Syston are very heavily involved in many community organisations. Many of them are key leaders of the community and belong to establish groups for many years’ e.g. Church groups, Bowling Club, football and cricket clubs, The Syston Carnival, Syston Christmas Fayre, Syston in Bloom, the Patients’ Forum for Syston Medical centre and many more. These residents would like to continue fully with their activities in Syston as they have done for many years. 5. Parish Boundaries- In areas where parishes exist, the parish boundaries often represent the extent of a community. In fact, the Commission often uses parishes as the building blocks of wards and electoral divisions. A further statement, states that we are required to divide it into parishes wards, so that each parish ward is wholly contained in a county division. - Your present proposal is dividing this part of the parish into the Thurmaston Ridgmere, County division which is against the above statement. Whereas we should be fully in Syston Fosse or Syston Ridgeway as a community. In conclusion, your statement says, ’we are currently inviting local people and organisation to tell us where they think new electoral division boundaries should be drawn across Leicestershire.’ We am requesting you to reconsider your draft proposal to keep to the original boundary division and leave this minor portion of Syston, where it belongs in true Syston. Yours sincerely, Mr M.H.Asmal, Mrs K.Asmal, Mr A.Asmal and Mr A.I.Asmal Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Leicestershire County Personal Details: Name: Mary Bell E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Oadby has always been separate from Wigston and South Wigston.All three feel they have an individual unique identity.The bus service provides poor links between the three,libraries are separate,the Swimming pools,the churches and in particular the shopping centres.We have come to know our own councillors over the years.We have our own Rugby and Football clubs and grounds.Leave us as we are.It works well as it is.Oadbys boundary is with Harborough on one side,Leicester on another and Wigston the other.our population has expanded greatly since I came in the 1970s.Just give us the number of councillors relevant to our population not our physical size. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/6405 22/12/2015 Owen, David From: Mayers, Mishka on behalf of reviews Sent: 16 December 2015 13:56 To: Owen, David Subject: FW: Leicestershire County Council Boundaries in the Borough of Melton Mowbray From: Graham Bett Sent: 16 December 2015 10:33 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Leicestershire County Council Boundaries in the Borough of Melton Mowbray Dear Sir Leicestershire County Council Boundaries in the Borough of Melton Mowbray I have looked carefully at the Commission’s proposals for Melton and feel very strongly that they represent the best possible Division Boundaries for the Town and Borough. This is because the Commission’s recommendations: Ensure, as far as reasonably possible, equality of representation, in terms of number of voters; Recognise the interests, identities and needs of both our urban and rural communities, including the need for the recognisable community of Melton Town to be suitably represented; Promote effective and convenient local government by creating divisions that are an appropriate size – they are easily manageable in terms of representation, and have clear understandable and logical boundaries. Melton Town does not have a Town Council and depends upon its Borough and County elected representatives to consider its particular interests, opportunities and challenges. Similarly, rural communities value representation from those with a strong commitment and understanding of their interests. I believe the effective representation of both rural and urban communities is best served by the current proposals for an East and a West Division within the Town Boundary. By creating the East and the West Divisions within the Melton Town Boundary, based on current Town Ward boundaries, the community identification of people living and working in the town is strengthened. An advantage of mainly keeping to the Melton Borough Council Ward boundaries is that it facilitates good governance through liaison between County and Borough Councillors. Thank you for taking my views into consideration. Kind Regards Graham Bett 1 2 Owen, David From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 03 December 2015 10:05 To: Owen, David Subject: FW: Oadby & Wigston Boundary Proposal From: HAZEL BEVINS Sent: 03 December 2015 09:59 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Oadby & Wigston Boundary Proposal Good Morning After reading information from my local council, I would like to record my objection to new boundary proposals, as I don't believe changes would have any real benefit to any of the communites affected and could indeed be detrimental. Yours Hazel Bevins 1 Owen, David From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 04 January 2016 13:25 To: Owen, David Subject: FW: Boundary reviews Syston Leicestershire ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: JULIE BLACK Sent: 04 January 2016 13:23 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Boundary reviews Syston Leicestershire F.A.O the review officer It has recently come to our attention via our local parish councillor of the intention of The Local Government Boundary Commission for England and Wales to be reviewing the boundary where I live.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review of District Centres in Charnwood
    Review of District Centres in Charnwood EXISTING DISTRICT CENTRE DESK TOP REVIEW Name of District Centre: ANSTEY Recommended Classification*: Maintain District Centre Classification Justification The District Centre contains a supermarket, and other convenience stores, non- retail services such as bank and take-away. Also included in the District Centre also contains a newsagent, post office a pharmacy. * Having regard to the descriptions of Town Centres, District Centres and Local Centres within Annex B to PPS 4, in particular considering the range of services available and the expected catchment for these services. Opportunity and Capacity for Further Development No real opportunities for significant further development. SWOT Strengths . Low vacancy . Varied services and facilities . Centre served by frequent bus service . Nearby public open space at Stadon Road . Parish Church provides important contribution to quality of the public realm Weaknesses . No capacity for further development within defined centre . The Nook is a traffic bottleneck, and also dominates the main focus for the District Centre . Limited public realm area . Limited soft landscaping in the centre Opportunities . None identified Threats . Competition from other centres particularly in Leicester/ Beaumont Leys . Changing shopping patterns Role and function in wider Economy/Fit with Core Strategy Vision** ** including any role in addressing areas of multiple deprivation or any ‘gaps’ in existing provision Anstey District Centre performs a role as a District Centre helping to address the needs of village residents and immediate area. Anstey District Centre contributes to Draft Spatial Objective 16 which is to ensure a network of vibrant District Centres Current State*** Stable *** Select from: Improving, Stable, Declining Summary of Key Issues/Recommendations for Future Strategy Maintain District Centre Classification.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARNWOOD SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT STUDY Study Report
    CHARNWOOD SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT STUDY Study Report Document Control Document: Study Report Project: Charnwood Transport Strategy Client: Charnwood Borough Council Job Number: A116305 File Origin: Location: N:\Projects\A116305 - Charnwood Transport Study\reports\ Revision: Draft V1 Date: March 2020 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Steve Boden | Ben Green Steve Boden Alistair Gregory Description of revision: Revision: Draft V2 Date: May 2020 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Steve Boden | Ben Green Ben King Alistair Gregory Description of revision: Revision: Final Date: September 2020 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Steve Boden Ben King Alistair Gregory Description of revision: www.wyg.com 1 Creative minds safe hands Contents 1.0 Background ........................................................................................................................... 9 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Context ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Challenges and Opportunities........................................................................................................ 10 Structure of the Report ................................................................................................................. 10 More Information ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 0X0a I Don't Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN
    0x0a I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a Contents I Don’t Know .................................................................4 About This Book .......................................................353 Imprint ........................................................................354 I Don’t Know I’m not well-versed in Literature. Sensibility – what is that? What in God’s name is An Afterword? I haven’t the faintest idea. And concerning Book design, I am fully ignorant. What is ‘A Slipcase’ supposed to mean again, and what the heck is Boriswood? The Canons of page construction – I don’t know what that is. I haven’t got a clue. How am I supposed to make sense of Traditional Chinese bookbinding, and what the hell is an Initial? Containers are a mystery to me. And what about A Post box, and what on earth is The Hollow Nickel Case? An Ammunition box – dunno. Couldn’t tell you. I’m not well-versed in Postal systems. And I don’t know what Bulk mail is or what is supposed to be special about A Catcher pouch. I don’t know what people mean by ‘Bags’. What’s the deal with The Arhuaca mochila, and what is the mystery about A Bin bag? Am I supposed to be familiar with A Carpet bag? How should I know? Cradleboard? Come again? Never heard of it. I have no idea. A Changing bag – never heard of it. I’ve never heard of Carriages. A Dogcart – what does that mean? A Ralli car? Doesn’t ring a bell. I have absolutely no idea. And what the hell is Tandem, and what is the deal with the Mail coach? 4 I don’t know the first thing about Postal system of the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Roads in Britain
    ROMAN ROADS IN BRITAIN c < t < r c ROMAN ROADS IN BRITAIN BY THE LATE THOMAS CODRINGTON M, INST.C. E., F. G S. fFITH LARGE CHART OF THE ROMAN ROADS AND SMALL MAPS IN THE TEXT REPRINT OF THIRD EDITION LONDON SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1919 . • r r 11 'X/^i-r * ' Ci First Edition^ 1903 Second Edition, Revised, 1905 Tliird Edition, Revised, 1918 (.Reprint), 19 „ ,, 19 PREFACE The following attempt to describe the Roman roads of Britain originated in observations made in all parts of the country as opportunities presented themselves to me from time to time. On turning to other sources of information, the curious fact appeared that for a century past the litera- ture of the subject has been widely influenced by the spurious Itinerary attributed to Richard of Cirencester. Though that was long ago shown to be a forgery, statements derived from it, and suppositions founded upon them, are continually repeated, casting suspicion sometimes unde- served on accounts which prove to be otherwise accurate. A wide publicity, and some semblance of authority, have been given to imaginary roads and stations by the new Ordnance maps. Those who early in the last century, under the influence of the new Itinerary, traced the Roman roads, unfortunately left but scanty accounts of the remains which came under their notice, many of which have since been destroyed or covered up in the making of modern roads; and with the evidence now available few Roman roads can be traced continuously. The gaps can often be filled with reasonable certainty, but more often the precise course is doubtful, and the entire course of some roads connecting known stations of the Itinerary of Antonine can only be guessed at.
    [Show full text]
  • Queniborough Neighbourhood Plan 2019-2028 Referendum
    February 2021 Queniborough Neighbourhood Plan 2019-2028 Referendum Queniborough Neighbourhood Plan: Referendum Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 Neighbourhood Plans ............................................................................................. 1 The Queniborough Neighbourhood Area .............................................................. 1 Basic Conditions ...................................................................................................... 3 National Planning Policy Framework .................................................................. 3 Charnwood Local Plan ......................................................................................... 3 Excluded Development ........................................................................................ 4 Leicester & Leicestershire 2050: Our Vision for Growth ........................................ 4 Plan preparation .................................................................................................... 5 2. Sustainable Development ..................................................................................... 8 Key Issues ................................................................................................................. 8 Vision ....................................................................................................................... 9 Implementation .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Application Reference Number P/13/2498/2
    Item No. 1 Application Reference Number P/13/2498/2 Application Type: Hybrid Date Valid: 04/01/2012 Applicant: Commercial Estates Projects & Mr J Pochin & Trustees Proposal: Mixed use residential-led development, to be developed in phases, including: Preparatory works including demolition as necessary; Approximately 4,500 residential units (Class C3, including affordable homes); Class C2 (specialist) housing; Up to 13 hectares of employment land (Use Classes B1(a),(b),and (C), B2 and B8); Two local centres and one district centre (including uses A1-A5, B1, C1, D1, and D2 and including a food-store (up to 4,500m² gross) with associated car parking); Provision for school facilities including a reserve site for a secondary school, healthcare facilities; a reserve site for gypsies and travellers; open space including allotments; parks; natural and semi-natural green space; amenity green spaces; facilities for children and young people; outdoor sports provision including playing pitches and tennis courts; associated infrastructure including footpaths cycleways, a north-west link road between Barkby Lane and the A607 with bridge across the railway line; and associated engineering and landscaping works (including SUDs). Location: Land to the North East of Leicester Parish: Barkby, Barkby Ward: Syston West, Thorpe, Thurmaston, Thurmaston Syston, Queniborough Case Officer: Graham Smith Tel No: 01509 632521 Application Site The application site comprises approximately 360 hectares of land located to the north- east of Leicester. The northern edge of the site abuts Barkby Lane between Syston and Barkby. The eastern edge is a mix of field boundaries near to Barkby and Barkby Thorpe. The southern boundary of the site adjoins the residential area of Hamilton and the Hamilton business park within Leicester City Council’s administrative area.
    [Show full text]
  • Bardon Barkby
    :BARDON BARKBY. Maynard. Bagworth Park is a hamlet belonging to th1s parisn. PosTAL REGULATIONS Joseph Johnson. sub-postmaster. Letters arrive at 6.45 a.m., are dispatched at 6 p.m. The nearest money:-order office is at Markfield. Post-town1 Leicester. Carriers to Leicester and Loughborough • -.E. J ohnson, Mary Kelham, and J no. Percival. Bott Mr Moon John, blacksmith and victualler, • Kenny Mrs the Plough Percival John, blacksmith and carrier GENERAL TRADES, &c. Willett Oliver, draper, grocer, &c. Drackley Sam., Barrel inn, and butcher FARMERS. Ellis J oseph & Sons, coal and lime mer- Annis Ro bert chants, Railway station Bass George, Bagworth park Garner John, wheelwright and carpenter Crosher George Geary , boot and shoemaker Crosher J ames Heath J., stationmaster Dowell Thomas .J ohnson Erasmus, shopkeeper and carrier Geary John .Johnson Joseph, draper, grocer, &c. Harris Crosher Kelham Mrs, carrier Kirkman Charles Kenny J ames, coal merchant Roberts John Miles Edward, tailor Wood Richard BA:RDON is an extra-parochial liberty, distant 6 miles from Lough­ borough and 1 from Bardon Hill railway station,. in the south division of the county, hundred of Sparkenhoe, union and county court district of Ashby-de-la-Zouch, diocese ofPeterborough, and archdeaconry of Leicester. The Independents have a chapel here. The acreage is 1270, of which the chief owner and lord of the manor is William Perry Herrick, Esq. The population is about 80. The nearest money-order office is at Markfield. Post-town, Leicester. Everard Breedon, Esq., Bard on Hill house Harris Edward Leslie Stephen Oscar, Esq., Bardon hall Hill Mra Elizabeth Ellis & Everard, Granite Quarry owners, Morrison John Bardon hill Morrison William FARMERS.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Derby
    Archaeological Investigations Project 2008 Desk-based Assessment East Midlands Derby Derby UA (B.56.1/2008) SK35793597 Parish: Breadsall Postal Code: DE1 2PY LAND AT SIDDALS ROAD AND COPELAND STREET, DERBY Archaeological Desk-based Assessment of Land at Siddals Road and Copeland Street, Derby May, R Sheffield : ARCUS, Report: 1204.2(1) 2008, 42pp, pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: ARCUS The site and its immediate environs appeared to have been developed between 1835 and 1852. The development included terraced housing, shops and public houses, a brass foundry and a timber yard, a Methodist chapel, a gasometer and two schools, the gasometer was replaced in 1879. The site was partially redeveloped in the 1930s with a new road laid out along the western boundary. The 1840s buildings were all demolished by 1968 with the 1879 school having been demolished after 1987.Geotechnical investigations suggested that there was the potential for the survival of 19th century archaeological remains in Area 1, whereas Area 2 contained substantial areas of made ground. [Au(abr)] SMR primary record number: 1114 Archaeological periods represented: PM OASIS ID: arcus2-44750 (B.56.2/2008) SK38023641 Parish: Chaddesden Postal Code: DE216LZ LAND AT CHADDESDEN PARK, DERBY An Archaeological Desk-based Assessment of Land at Chaddesden Park, Derby May, R Sheffield : ARCUS, Report: 1249.1(1) 2008, 29pp, colour pls, figs, refs Work undertaken by: ARCUS The site lay adjacent to a postulated 1st century AD Roman road. A Roman coin was found in the park in the 1970s and a large number of coins were recorded to be found in the parish in the 17th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Barkby Road Syston.Doc, Item 735. PDF 5 MB
    TH REPORT TO CABINET – 11 NOVEMBER 2003 JOINT REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES AND DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORTATION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT HALLAM LAND MANAGEMENT – ERECTION OF 340 DWELLINGS AND ASSOCIATED OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPING AND SURFACE WATER BALANCING AND NEW ACCESS ROAD TO THE RIDGEMERE CENTRE, LAND TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH OF BARKBY ROAD, SYSTON (CHARNWOOD BOROUGH) 2001/2462/02 – Received by L.C.C. on 26th October 2001 Purpose of Report 1. The purpose of this report is to obtain Members responses on a major new housing proposal at Syston, which is the subject of consultation with the County Council. A threefold response to the Borough Council is required, setting out County Council’s views as: (i) strategic planning authority ; in accordance with the procedures set out in Para 1 of the Schedule to the Town and country Planning Act 1990; (ii) highway authority, under the provisions of Article 10 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedures) Order; and (iii) service provider for the various County Council functions, in the context of the supplementary planning guidance on ‘Requirements for Developer Contributions’ adopted by the County Council in 2001. 2. The report also provides the opportunity to update Members on the circumstances relating to this development proposal since it was considered by the Regulatory Board at its meeting in December 2001. It sets out the progress made towards the adoption of the Local Plan and the status of the application site within that document, insofar as they impact on the decisions of the County Council. Also, it highlights any changes in the actual proposal itself, since the previous consideration by the Regulatory Board.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Derby
    Archaeological Investigations Project 2008 Desk-based Assessment East Midlands Derby Derby UA (B.56.1/2008) SK35793597 Parish: Breadsall Postal Code: DE1 2PY LAND AT SIDDALS ROAD AND COPELAND STREET, DERBY Archaeological Desk-based Assessment of Land at Siddals Road and Copeland Street, Derby May, R Sheffield : ARCUS, Report: 1204.2(1) 2008, 42pp, pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: ARCUS The site and its immediate environs appeared to have been developed between 1835 and 1852. The development included terraced housing, shops and public houses, a brass foundry and a timber yard, a Methodist chapel, a gasometer and two schools, the gasometer was replaced in 1879. The site was partially redeveloped in the 1930s with a new road laid out along the western boundary. The 1840s buildings were all demolished by 1968 with the 1879 school having been demolished after 1987.Geotechnical investigations suggested that there was the potential for the survival of 19th century archaeological remains in Area 1, whereas Area 2 contained substantial areas of made ground. [Au(abr)] SMR primary record number: 1114 Archaeological periods represented: PM OASIS ID: arcus2-44750 (B.56.2/2008) SK38023641 Parish: Chaddesden Postal Code: DE216LZ LAND AT CHADDESDEN PARK, DERBY An Archaeological Desk-based Assessment of Land at Chaddesden Park, Derby May, R Sheffield : ARCUS, Report: 1249.1(1) 2008, 29pp, colour pls, figs, refs Work undertaken by: ARCUS The site lay adjacent to a postulated 1st century AD Roman road. A Roman coin was found in the park in the 1970s and a large number of coins were recorded to be found in the parish in the 17th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Submission Draft Queniborough
    October 2019 Queniborough Neighbourhood Plan 2019-2028 Pre-Submission Queniborough Neighbourhood Plan: Pre-Submission Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Neighbourhood Plans ............................................................................................. 1 The Queniborough Neighbourhood Area .............................................................. 1 Basic Conditions ...................................................................................................... 3 National Planning Policy Framework .................................................................. 3 Charnwood Local Plan ......................................................................................... 3 Excluded Development ........................................................................................ 4 Leicester & Leicestershire 2050: Our Vision for Growth ........................................ 4 What has been done so far ..................................................................................... 5 Consultation ............................................................................................................ 6 What happens next? ............................................................................................... 8 2. Sustainable Development .................................................................................... 9 Key Issues ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Statement Former Isolation Hospital & Toll House, Syston
    Floor 4 24 De Montfort Street Leicester LE1 7GB T: 0116 204 7766 [email protected] www.bsp-consulting.co.uk Transport Statement Former Isolation Hospital & Toll House, Syston For P. Winterton Ltd Project: 17-0473 Original: 21.02.2018 By: MAM Checked JSP Managing Director: Eur Ing David Sumner BSc(Hons) MSc CEng FICE MIHT Directors: Clive Roddick BSc(Hons) CEng MICE Mark Rayers BSc(Hons) FCILT MIHTT Carl J Hilton MSc BSc(Hons) CEng MIStructE MAPM Jef Todd Associate Directors: Jason Davenport BEng(Hons) MIHT Tony Goddard BEng(Hons) CEng MICE Paul Elphick BSc(Hons) CEng MICE Associates: Paul Whittingham BEng(Hons) CEng MIStructE Matthew Viggars MEng(Hons) CEng MICE Tim Wilson BEng(Hons) Consultant: Martin Breakwell BSc(Hons) CEng MICE Derby Office: 5 Pride Point Drive, Pride Park, Derby, DE24 8BX Leicester Office: Suite B, Floor 3, 24 De Montfort Street, Leicester LE1 7BG Sheffield Office: Top Floor, Sheffield Studio, Vincent House, Solly Street, Sheffield S1 4BB Breakwell Sumner Partnership Ltd. Registered Office: 12 Oxford Street, Nottingham NG1 5BG. Registered in England and Wales No. 3669014 Amendments & Authorisation Record Job Title: Former Isolation Hospital & Toll Job Number: 17-0473 House, Syston Revision Purpose Description Originated Checked Authorised Date / Transport Assessment MAM JSP JSP 21.02.2018 MAM Martin Murphy BSc (Hons) Senior Transport Planner JSP Jonanne Posnett BA (Hons) MCIHT Principal Transport Planner BSP Consulting MAM/17-0473 Former Isolation Hospital & Toll House, Meadow Lane, Syston Transport Statement CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Local Context ................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 Existing Site and Development Proposals.....................................................................
    [Show full text]