Micropattern Gas Detectors for the CMS Experiment's Muon System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Micropattern Gas Detectors for the CMS Experiment's Muon System Università degli Studi di Pavia Dipartimento di Fisica DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN FISICA – XXXI CICLO Micropattern Gas Detectors for the CMS Experiment’s Muon System Upgrade: Performance Studies and Commissioning of the first GEM Detectors Martina Ressegotti Submitted to the Graduate School of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOTTORE DI RICERCA IN FISICA DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHYSICS at the University of Pavia Supervisor: Prof. Paolo Vitulo Cover: The CMS detector. Micropattern Gas Detectors for the CMS Experiment’s Muon System Upgrade: Performance Studies and Commissioning of the first GEM Detectors Martina Ressegotti PhD thesis - University of Pavia Pavia, Italy, November 2018 The work I carried out during the PhD is focused on the upgrade of the muon system of the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment with Mi- cropattern Gas Detectors (MPGDs). The discovery potential of the experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is strictly related to the delivered luminosity, hence the LHC has an upgrade program in order to increase the instantaneous luminosity in the next years. It plans to enhance it up to about five times the nominal value by 2025 and to deliver about 3000 fb−1 of integrated luminosity in the next ten years of operation, an order of magnitude higher than the one collected since the first physics run in 2011 until now. On the other hand, the LHC upgrade represents a major challenge for the experiments, as the high radiation dose and event pileup would degrade their performance if they don't undergo an upgrade program involving several as- pects as well. One example is the necessity to improve the CMS muon system in the re- gion close to the beam direction to allow maintaining a trigger performance at least as high as during previous LHC runs, but also to compensate for possible performance losses of the existing muon detectors due to aging effects after years of operation. The upgrade of the muon system with Gas Electron Multi- plier (GEM) detectors, involving three new muon stations (GE1/1, GE2/1 and ME0), serves this goal. In addition, it will also extend the muon system closer to the beam direction, increasing its total acceptance and hence the discovery potential of several physics channels. Throughout the PhD I first took part in the R&D on MPGDs for the upgrade of CMS muon system, in particular in the development and char- acterization of the first prototypes of Back to Back GEM detector and Fast Timing Micropattern detector for the ME0 station, presented in chapter3. They have been considered to cope with the challenges characteristic of this station, represented by the necessity to instrument a small available space with six detector layers and the capability to handle the high background rate present in that forward position. Then I continued my work participating in the commissioning and integration of the first GEM detectors { the GE1/1 slice test { into the CMS experiment, described in chapter4. The installation of the full GE1/1 station is scheduled in 2019-20, but a demonstrator made of ten detectors was installed already at the beginning of 2017 and was operated in 2017-2018 with the goal to acquire installation and commissioning expertise, to develop the integration into the CMS online system and to prove the oper- ability of the system in the CMS environment. The GE1/1 slice test represents a peerless test bench to get ready for the installation of the complete GEM subsystem. Finally, currently I am also carrying out some trigger studies to understand how to use the ME0 station, which will extend the muon system to higher pseudorapidity, to trigger specific physics channels in the extended region where no other muon station is present. The first preliminary results are presented in chapter5. Contents List of Figures vi List of Tables xxvii 1 Introduction1 1.1 The CMS experiment at the LHC.................1 1.2 Physics at the CMS experiment..................2 1.2.1 The Higgs Boson......................3 1.2.2 Physics Beyond the Standard Model...........5 1.3 Structure of the CMS detector................... 11 1.4 The Muon System......................... 18 1.4.1 Drift Tubes......................... 19 1.4.2 Cathode Strip Chambers.................. 20 1.4.3 Resistive Plate Chambers................. 23 1.5 The CMS trigger system...................... 26 1.5.1 The Level-1 Trigger..................... 26 1.5.2 The Muon Trigger..................... 27 1.6 The Upgrades of LHC and CMS.................. 29 1.6.1 Overview.......................... 29 1.6.2 CMS operation at the HL-LHC.............. 31 1.6.3 The Phase-II Upgrade of the CMS detector....... 33 2 The GEM Upgrade of the CMS Muon System 37 2.1 Motivation.............................. 37 2.2 The GEM Technology....................... 40 2.2.1 Micropattern Gas Detectors................ 40 2.2.2 The Gas Electron Multiplier................ 42 2.2.3 Detector Performance................... 44 2.3 The GE1/1 station......................... 49 2.3.1 GE1/1 chambers minimum requirements......... 54 2.3.2 The Slice Test........................ 55 2.4 The GE2/1 station......................... 55 iii CONTENTS 2.5 The ME0 station.......................... 58 2.5.1 Impact on physics in the forward region......... 59 2.5.2 Effect of the time resolution................ 62 2.5.3 Choice of the detector technology............. 66 3 Development and Performance of New Micropattern Gas De- tectors 71 3.1 The Back to Back GEM detector................. 71 3.2 Characterization of the B2B detector in laboratory....... 75 3.2.1 Detector's Rate and Gain................. 77 3.2.2 Summary and discussion.................. 83 3.3 Test Beam studies on the B2B detector.............. 85 3.3.1 Test beam setup...................... 85 3.3.2 Detector Efficiency with tracking............. 88 3.3.3 Timing performance.................... 97 3.3.4 Detector efficiency without tracking............ 100 3.3.5 Summary and discussion.................. 104 3.3.5.1 Detector efficiency................ 104 3.3.5.2 Timing performance............... 109 3.4 The Fast Timing Micropattern detector.............. 114 3.5 Characterization of the FTMv1 in laboratory........... 117 3.5.1 Linearity and transparency................. 119 3.5.2 Scan in electric field.................... 119 3.5.3 Detector's Gain....................... 122 3.5.4 Detector's Efficiency.................... 125 3.6 Test beam studies on the FTMv1 detector............ 127 3.6.1 Timing performance.................... 127 3.6.2 Summary and discussion.................. 131 3.7 Next FTM detector prototypes.................. 131 3.7.1 Preliminary considerations................. 131 3.7.2 Second FTM prototype................... 134 3.8 Recent updates on the FTM detector............... 146 3.9 Conclusions............................. 148 4 The GE1/1 Slice Test 151 4.1 The GE1/1 Slice Test........................ 151 4.2 System overview.......................... 151 4.2.1 High Voltage........................ 152 4.2.2 Readout system and low voltage.............. 155 4.2.3 Gas system......................... 157 4.3 Operating the multi-channel power supply............ 157 4.4 The Detector Control System................... 159 4.5 The CMS and LHC automation.................. 170 4.5.1 LHC operation....................... 173 4.5.2 The automation matrix................... 174 iv CONTENTS 4.6 The GEM Finite State Machine.................. 174 4.6.1 The Gas System FSM sub-tree.............. 177 4.6.2 The High Voltage FSM sub-tree.............. 177 4.6.3 The Low Voltage FSM sub-tree.............. 181 4.7 The FSM of the multi-channel supply............... 182 4.7.1 The GEM Configurator Device Unit........... 183 4.7.2 The GEM Configurator Control Manager......... 185 4.8 The GEM Detector Protection system.............. 188 4.8.1 The Detector Protection for the single-channel power supply............................ 190 4.8.2 The Detector Protection for the multi-channel power supply............................ 191 4.9 Inclusion into the central CMS DCS................ 197 4.10 The DAQ system.......................... 198 4.10.1 Calibration......................... 199 4.11 System performance........................ 204 4.11.1 Stability........................... 204 4.11.2 Detector Performance................... 206 4.12 Conclusions and future perspectives................ 210 4.12.1 The Detector Control System............... 210 4.12.2 The DAQ system and Detector Performance....... 211 5 A Trigger Study for the ME0 Station 213 5.1 Introduction............................. 213 5.1.1 The ME0 station...................... 213 5.1.2 L1 trigger for specific analyses............... 213 5.1.3 The τ ! 3µ decay..................... 214 5.2 Tau production at the LHC.................... 215 5.2.1 Signal simulation...................... 216 5.3 Muon reconstruction in the ME0 station............. 219 5.3.1 Evaluation of the bending thresholds........... 226 5.4 Evaluation of the trigger efficiency................. 226 5.5 Evaluation of the trigger rates................... 233 5.6 Some example cases......................... 234 5.7 Conclusions and future prospects................. 239 6 Conclusions 241 A Trigger efficiencies 245 Bibliography 249 v List of Figures 1.1 Candidate events for the Higgs decays H ! γγ (top) and H ! ZZ∗ ! eeµµ (bottom). In the top panel the green lines represent two reconstructed photons, in the bottom panel the green and red lines pointing towards the center of the detec- tor represent two reconstructed electrons and
Recommended publications
  • Detection of Cosmic Rays at the LHC Detection of Cosmic Rays at the LHC
    Particle and Astroparticle Physics at the Large Hadron Collider --Hadronic Interactions-- Albert De Roeck CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Antwerp University Belgium UC-Davis California USA NTU, Singapore November 15th 2019 Outline • Introduction on the LHC and LHC physics program • LHC results for Astroparticle physics • Measurements of event characteristics at 13 TeV • Forward measurements • Cosmic ray measurements • LHC and light ions? • Summary The LHC Machine and Experiments MoEDAL LHCf FASER totem CM energy → Run-1: (2010-2012) 7/8 TeV Run-2: (2015-2018) 13 TeV -> Now 8 experiments Run-2 starts proton-proton Run-2 finished 24/10/18 6:00am 2018 2010-2012: Run-1 at 7/8 TeV CM energy Collected ~ 27 fb-1 2015-2018: Run-2 at 13 TeV CM Energy Collected ~ 140 fb-1 2021-2023/24 : Run-3 Expect ⇨ 14 TeV CM Energy and ~ 200/300 fb-1 The LHC is also a Heavy Ion Collider ALICE Data taking during the HI run • All experiments take AA or pA data (except TOTEM) Expected for Run-3: in addition short pO and OO runs ⇨ pO certainly of interest for Cosmic Ray Physics Community! 4 10 years of LHC Operation • LHC: 7 TeV in March 2010 ->The highest energy in the lab! • LHC @ 13 TeV from 2015 onwards March 30 2010 …waiting.. • Most important highlight so far: …since 4:00 am The discovery of a Higgs boson • Many results on Standard Model process measurements, QCD and particle production, top-physics, b-physics, heavy ion physics, searches, Higgs physics • Waiting for the next discovery… -> Searches beyond the Standard Model 12:58 7 TeV collisions!!! New Physics Hunters
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratori Nazionali Di Frascati
    International Committee for Future Accelerators Sponsored by the Particles and Fields Commission of IUPAP Beam Dynamics Newsletter No. 51 Issue Editor: S. Chattopadhyay Editor in Chief: W. Chou April 2010 3 Contents 1 FOREWORD ........................................................................................................ 11 1.1 FROM THE CHAIRMAN ............................................................................................. 11 1.2 FROM THE EDITOR .................................................................................................. 12 2 INTERNATIONAL LINEAR COLLIDER (ILC) ............................................ 14 2.1 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL ACCELERATOR SCHOOL FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS ............... 14 3 THEME SECTION: ACCELERATOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN THE UK ................................................................................................................ 20 3.1 OVERVIEW – AN EMERGING PARADIGM OF COLLABORATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES, NATIONAL FACILITIES AND INDUSTRY ............................................ 20 3.1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 20 3.1.2 Mission of UK Accelerator Science and Technology .................................. 20 3.1.3 The Model: Integrated Accelerator Community and Stakeholders .............. 21 3.1.4 The Research Program Driven by Science ................................................... 21 3.1.4.1 Research Focus: Current ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrade of the Global Muon Trigger for the Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment at CERN”
    DISSERTATION/DOCTORAL THESIS Titel der Dissertation/Title of the Doctoral Thesis “Upgrade of the Global Muon Trigger for the Compact Muon Solenoid experiment at CERN” verfasst von/submitted by Mag. Dinyar Sebastian Rabady angestrebter akademischer Grad/in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doktor der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) Wien, im Jänner 2018/Vienna, in January 2018 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt/ A 796 605 411 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt/ Physik field of study as it appears onthe student record sheet: Betreut von/Supervisor: Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Hon.-Prof. Dipl.-Phys. Dr. Eberhard Widmann Für meinen Großvater. Abstract The Large Hadron Collider is a large particle accelerator at the CERN research labo- ratory, designed to provide particle physics experiments with collisions at unprece- dented centre-of-mass energies. For its second running period both the number of colliding particles and their collision energy were increased. To cope with these more challenging conditions and maintain the excellent performance seen during the first running period, the Level-1 trigger of the Compact Muon Solenoid experiment — a so- phisticated electronics system designed to filter events in real-time — was upgraded. This upgrade consisted of the complete replacement of the trigger electronics andafull redesign of the system’s architecture. While the calorimeter trigger path now follows a time-multiplexed processing model where the entire trigger data for a collision are received by a single processing board, the muon trigger path was split into regional track finding systems where each newly introduced track finder receives data from all three muon subdetectors for a certain geometric detector slice and reconstructs fully formed muon tracks from this.
    [Show full text]
  • The Very Forward CASTOR Calorimeter of the CMS Experiment
    EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-EP-2020-180 2021/02/11 CMS-PRF-18-002 The very forward CASTOR calorimeter of the CMS experiment The CMS Collaboration* Abstract The physics motivation, detector design, triggers, calibration, alignment, simulation, and overall performance of the very forward CASTOR calorimeter of the CMS exper- iment are reviewed. The CASTOR Cherenkov sampling calorimeter is located very close to the LHC beam line, at a radial distance of about 1 cm from the beam pipe, and at 14.4 m from the CMS interaction point, covering the pseudorapidity range of −6.6 < h < −5.2. It was designed to withstand high ambient radiation and strong magnetic fields. The performance of the detector in measurements of forward energy density, jets, and processes characterized by rapidity gaps, is reviewed using data collected in proton and nuclear collisions at the LHC. ”Published in the Journal of Instrumentation as doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/02/P02010.” arXiv:2011.01185v2 [physics.ins-det] 10 Feb 2021 © 2021 CERN for the benefit of the CMS Collaboration. CC-BY-4.0 license *See Appendix A for the list of collaboration members Contents 1 Contents 1 Introduction . .1 2 Physics motivation . .3 2.1 Forward physics in proton-proton collisions . .3 2.2 Ultrahigh-energy cosmic ray air showers . .5 2.3 Proton-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus collisions . .5 3 Detector design . .6 4 Triggers and operation . .9 5 Event reconstruction and calibration . 12 5.1 Noise and baseline . 13 5.2 Gain correction factors . 15 5.3 Channel-by-channel intercalibration .
    [Show full text]
  • Montecarlo Simulations Using GRID
    UNIVERSITADEGLISTUDIDITORINO` Facolt`a di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali Dottorato di ricerca in Fisica XVII Ciclo Spin asymmetries for the reaction µD → µΛXat COMPASS: MonteCarlo simulations using GRID Candidato Antonio Amoroso Relatore Prof.ssa Maria Pia Bussa Coordinatore del ciclo Prof. Ezio Menichetti 2002-2004 0.1. Introduction i 0.1 Introduction COMPASS (COmmon Muon and Proton Apparatus for Structure and Spec- troscopy) [1] is a complex experimental apparatus assembled by an interna- tional collaboration of more than 20 Institutions. Two research physics pro- grams have been planned. One centered on muon physics and the other one on hadron physics. COMPASS is a fixed target experiment in the North Area site at CERN. It uses beams produced by the SPS accelerator. The experiment is placed in the EHN2 hall (Bldg. 888) in the Prevessin (F) site of CERN. The purpose of the experiment is the study of the structure and the spectroscopy of hadrons using different high intensity beams of lepton and hadrons with energies ranging from 100 to 200 GeV. The experiment aims to collect large samples of charmed particles. From the measurement of the cross section asymmetry for open charm production in deep inelastic scattering of polarized muons on polarized nucleons, the gluon polarization ∆G will be determined and compared with the available theoretical predictions. Hadron beams are used to study the semi-leptonic decays of charmed doubly charmed baryons. Both measurements will allow to study fundamental prob- lems regarding the hadron structure and to test Heavy Quark Effective Theory (HQET) calculations. Moreover the production of exotic states, which are fore- seen by the QCD but have not yet been established, will investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrade of the Global Muon Trigger for the Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment at CERN
    DISSERTATION/DOCTORAL THESIS Titel der Dissertation/Title of the Doctoral Thesis “Upgrade of the Global Muon Trigger for the Compact Muon Solenoid experiment at CERN” verfasst von/submitted by Mag. Dinyar Sebastian Rabady angestrebter akademischer Grad/in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doktor der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) CERN-THESIS-2018-033 25/04/2018 Wien, im Jänner 2018/Vienna, in January 2018 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt/ A 796 605 411 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt/ Physik field of study as it appears onthe student record sheet: Betreut von/Supervisor: Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Hon.-Prof. Dipl.-Phys. Dr. Eberhard Widmann Für meinen Großvater. Abstract The Large Hadron Collider is a large particle accelerator at the CERN research labo- ratory, designed to provide particle physics experiments with collisions at unprece- dented centre-of-mass energies. For its second running period both the number of colliding particles and their collision energy were increased. To cope with these more challenging conditions and maintain the excellent performance seen during the first running period, the Level-1 trigger of the Compact Muon Solenoid experiment — a so- phisticated electronics system designed to filter events in real-time — was upgraded. This upgrade consisted of the complete replacement of the trigger electronics andafull redesign of the system’s architecture. While the calorimeter trigger path now follows a time-multiplexed processing model where the entire trigger data for a collision are received by a single processing board, the muon trigger path was split into regional track finding systems where each newly introduced track finder receives data from all three muon subdetectors for a certain geometric detector slice and reconstructs fully formed muon tracks from this.
    [Show full text]
  • Cern: a European Laboratory for the World
    CERN: A EUROPEAN LABORATORY FOR THE WORLD G.K. Mallot CERN THE BEGINNINGS 1949: Proposal by de Broglie to the Eur. Cult. Conf. "the creation of a laboratory or institution where it would be possible to do scientific work, but somehow beyond the framework of the different participating states” “undertake tasks, which, by virtue of their size and cost, were beyond the scope of individual countries" 1952: Interim council: Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire left council members : Pierre Auger, Edoardo Amaldi and Lew Kowarski 1953: Geneva chosen as location G. K. Mallot Yamagata/ 24 September 2008 2 THE BEGINNINGS 1954: European Organization for Nuclear Research 12 founding European Member States Belgium, Denmark, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and Yugoslavia foundation stone laying 10 June 1955 by DG Felix Mission: Bloch • provide for collaboration among European States in nuclear research of a pure scientific and fundamental character • have no concern with work for military requirements • the results of its experimental and theoretical work shall be published or otherwise made generally available . G. K. Mallot Yamagata/ 24 September 2008 3 A GOBAL ENDEAVOUR > half of world’s particle physicists G. K. Mallot Yamagata/ 24 September 2008 4 CERN IN NUMBERS 2500 staff 9000 users (192 from Japan) 800 fellows and associates 580 universities, 85 nations Budget 987MCHF (93 GJPY) 20 Member States: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, 7 Observers: the Slovak Republic, Spain, India, Israel, Japan, Sweden, Switzerland and the Russian Federation, Turkey, the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Hydrodynamic Tunneling Induced by High-Energy Proton Beam in Copper by Coupling Computer Codes
    PHYSICAL REVIEW ACCELERATORS AND BEAMS 22, 014501 (2019) Editors' Suggestion Simulation of hydrodynamic tunneling induced by high-energy proton beam in copper by coupling computer codes † ‡ Y. Nie,1,* C. Fichera,1 L. Mettler,1, F. Carra,1 R. Schmidt,1, N. A. Tahir,2 A. Bertarelli,1 and D. Wollmann1 1CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland 2GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany (Received 18 October 2018; published 11 January 2019; corrected 31 January 2019) The design of machine protection systems for high-energy accelerators with high-intensity beams requires analyzing a large number of failures leading to beam loss. One of the most serious failures is an accidental impact of a large number of bunches at one location, for example, due to a deflection of the particle beams by the extraction kicker magnets with the wrong strength. The numerical assessment of such an event requires an iterative execution of an energy-deposition code and a hydrodynamic code, in case the hydrodynamic tunneling effect plays an important role in the beam-matter interactions. Such calculations have been performed for the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC), since the energy stored in the LHC beams exceeds previous accelerators by 2 orders of magnitude. This was done using the particle shower code FLUKA and the hydrodynamic code BIG2 [Tahir et al., Phys. Rev. STAccel. Beams 15, 051003 (2012)]. Later, simulations for a number of cases for other accelerators at CERN and the Future Circular Collider (FCC) were performed [Tahir et al., Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19, 081002 (2016)]. These simulations showed that the penetration depth of the beam in copper or graphite could be an order of magnitude deeper when considering the hydrodynamic tunneling, compared to a static approximation.
    [Show full text]
  • Across the Ocean, Yet Close to Home by Katie Yurkewicz
    Across the ocean, yet close to home By Katie Yurkewicz Among the 10,000 people from around the world who are working on the Large Hadron Collider, 1000 hail from universities and national labs in the United States. The Large Hadron Collider is the world’s next-generation and students from almost 60 nations. More than 1000 of particle accelerator. Arguably the most ambitious scien- these hail from 93 universities and national laboratories tific endeavor ever undertaken, the $8.7 billion project at in the United States. Researchers from US institutions have CERN, the European particle physics lab in Geneva, made vital contributions to all aspects of LHC construction, Switzerland, has been in the works for more than two and are now looking forward to the next phase, when they decades. When it begins operating in mid-2008, scien- will see collisions begin, watch data start flowing, and spend tists predict that its very-high-energy collisions will yield many a sleepless night searching for the tracks of particles extraordinary discoveries about the nature of the whose existence would transform our understanding of the physical universe. universe. The LHC project has two equally important aspects: the collider itself and its six particle detectors, each one a Putting the C in LHC self-contained experiment. The collider, nearing completion The heart of the LHC project is the collider itself, and the in a 27-kilometer ring deep below the Swiss-French border, heart of the collider is a series of thousands of super- will accelerate two beams of protons in opposite directions conducting magnets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Totem and Atlas/Alfa Experiments a Word from the Director-General
    Issue No. 38-39/2016 - Monday 19 September 2016 CERN Bulletin More articles at: http://bulletin.cern.ch DE-SQUEEZE THE BEAMS: THE TOTEM AND ATLAS/ALFA EXPERIMENTS A WORD FROM THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL A special week-long proton–proton run with larger beam sizes at the interaction point is THERE’S MORE TO PARTICLE PHYSICS AT CERN intended to probe the p-p elastic scattering regime at small angles. THAN COLLIDERS CERN’s scientific programme must be compelling, unique, diverse, and integrated into the global landscape of particle physics. One of the Laboratory’s primary goals is to provide a diverse range of excellent physics opportunities and to put its unique facilities to optimum use, maximising the scientific return. (Continued on page 2) In this issue Nicola Turini, deputy spokesperson for TOTEM, in front of one of the experiment’s ‘Roman Pot’ detectors in the LHC tunnel. (Photo: Maximilien Brice/CERN) NEWS Usually, the motto of the LHC is “maximum beams are, and the more parallel the beams are De-squeeze the beams: the luminosity”. But for a few days per year, the LHC when they arrive at the interaction point. For TOTEM and ATLAS/ALFA experiments 1 ignores its motto to run at very low luminosity this special run, the beta-star had to be raised There’s more to particle physics for the forward experiments. This week, the to 2.5 km (whereas in normal runs it is as small at CERN than colliders 1 LHC will provide the TOTEM and ATLAS/ALFA as 0.4 m).
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Diffraction with the ATLAS Detector at The
    Th`esede doctorat de l’Universit´eParis 11 et de l’Institut de Physique Nucléaire de l’Académie Polonaise des Sciences sp´ecialit´e Champs, Particules, Mati`ere pr´esent´eepar Rafa lSTASZEWSKI pour obtenir les grades de docteur de l’Universit´eParis 11 et de l’Institut de Physique Nucléaire de l’Académie Polonaise des Sciences Study of Diffraction with the ATLAS detector at the LHC Th`esesoutenu le 24 Septembre 2012 devant le jury compos´ede: Etienne AUGE(´ pr´esident) Marco BRUSCHI (rapporteur) Janusz CHWASTOWSKI (directeur de th`ese) Alan MARTIN (rapporteur) Christophe ROYON (directeur de th`ese) Robi PESCHANSKI Antoni SZCZUREK Th`esepr´epar´ee au Service de Physique des Particules du CEA de Saclay et `al’Institut de Physique Nucléaire de l’Académie Polonaise des Sciences de Cracovie The thesis is devoted to the study of diffractive physics with the ATLAS de- tector at the LHC. After a short introduction to diffractive physics including soft and hard diffraction, we discuss diffractive exclusive production at the LHC which is particularly interesting for Higgs and jet production. The QCD mechanism de- scribed by the Khoze Martin Ryskin and the CHIDe models are elucidated in detail. The uncertainties on these models are still large and a new possible exclusive jet measurement at the LHC will allow to reduce the uncertainty on diffarctive Higgs boson production to a factor 2 to 3. An additional measurement of exclusive pion production pp → pπ+π−p allows to constrain further exclusive model relying on the use of the ALFA stations, which are used in the ATLAS Experiment for detection of protons scattered in elastic and diffractive interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quark and Gluon Structure of the Proton E. Perez
    The Quark and Gluon Structure of the Proton E. Pereza and E. Rizvib a CERN, PH Department, Geneva, CH b Queen Mary University of London, School of Physics and Astronomy, London, UK Abstract In this article we present a review of the structure of the proton and the current status of our knowledge of the parton distribution functions (PDFs). The lepton-nucleon scattering experiments which provide the main constraints in PDF extractions are introduced and their measurements are discussed. Particular emphasis is given to the HERA data which arXiv:1208.1178v2 [hep-ex] 7 Aug 2012 cover a wide kinematic region. Hadron-hadron scattering measurements which provide supplementary information are also discussed. The methods used by various groups to extract the PDFs in QCD analyses of hard scattering data are presented and their results are compared. The use of existing measurements allows predictions for cross sections at the LHC to be made. A comparison of these predictions for selected processes is given. First measurements from the LHC experiments are compared to predictions and some initial studies of the impact of this new data on the PDFs are presented. Submitted to Reports on Progress in Physics. 1 Introduction The birth of modern experimental particle physics in which particles were used to probe the structure of composite objects began with the famous alpha particle scattering experiment of Geiger and Marsden under the direction of Rutherford. In 1911 Rutherford published an analy- sis of the data providing evidence for atomic structure consisting of a massive positively charged nucleus surrounded by electrons [1]. Since then the use of particle probes to deduce structure has become standard, albeit at increasingly higher energy and intensity which brings its own technological and experimental challenges.
    [Show full text]