DOCSLIB.ORG

Report-SR Extrajudicial Executions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report-SR Extrajudicial Executions UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2001/9/Add.1 17 January 2001 ENGLISH Original: ENGLISH/FRENCH/SPANISH ENGLISH, FRENCH AND SPANISH ONLY COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Fifty-seventh session Item 11 (b) of the provisional agenda CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING QUESTIONS OF: DISAPPEARANCES AND SUMMARY EXECUTIONS Report of the Special Rapporteur, Ms. Asma Jahanhir, submitted pursuant to Commission resolution 2000/31 Addendum Summary of cases transmitted to Governments and replies received GE.01-10261 (E) E/CN.4/2001/9/Add.1 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 - 2 5 SUMMARY OF CASES TRANSMITTED AND REPLIES RECEIVED .............................................................................................. 3 - 437 5 A. Countries ....................................................................................... 3 - 435 5 Albania ................................................................................. 3 - 6 5 Algeria .................................................................................. 7 - 9 5 Angola .................................................................................. 10 - 11 6 Argentina .............................................................................. 12 - 15 6 Austria .................................................................................. 16 7 Bahrain ................................................................................. 17 8 Bangladesh ........................................................................... 18 -19 9 Bolivia .................................................................................. 20 -26 9 Brazil .................................................................................... 27 - 35 11 Burundi ................................................................................ 36 - 41 13 Cameroon ............................................................................. 42 13 Canada ................................................................................. 43 - 44 14 Chile ..................................................................................... 45 14 China .................................................................................... 46 - 60 15 Colombia .............................................................................. 61 - 150 17 Congo ................................................................................... 151 35 Côte d’Ivoire ........................................................................ 152 - 156 35 Cuba ..................................................................................... 157 - 163 36 Democratic Republic of the Congo ..................................... 164 - 169 38 Dominican Republic ............................................................ 170 - 171 38 Ecuador ................................................................................ 172 - 173 39 Egypt .................................................................................... 174 39 El Salvador ........................................................................... 175 39 Equatorial Guinea ................................................................ 177 - 176 40 E/CN.4/2001/9/Add.1 page 3 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page Ethiopia ................................................................................ 178 - 179 40 Gambia ................................................................................. 180 - 181 40 Guatemala ............................................................................ 182 - 193 41 Honduras .............................................................................. 194 - 205 43 India ..................................................................................... 206 - 232 46 Indonesia .............................................................................. 233 - 244 50 Iran (Islamic Republic of) .................................................... 245 - 251 53 Israel .................................................................................... 252 - 262 55 Jamaica ................................................................................ 263 - 265 57 Jordan ................................................................................... 266 - 267 57 Kenya ................................................................................... 268 58 Lebanon ............................................................................... 269 58 Mexico ................................................................................. 270 - 297 59 Myanmar .............................................................................. 298 - 311 65 Namibia ................................................................................ 312 67 Nepal..................................................................................... 313 - 319 67 Nicaragua ............................................................................. 320 - 321 68 Nigeria ................................................................................. 322 68 Oman .................................................................................... 323 69 Pakistan ................................................................................ 324 - 329 69 Peru ...................................................................................... 330 - 337 71 Philippines ........................................................................... 338 - 340 72 Russian Federation ............................................................... 341 - 351 73 Rwanda ................................................................................ 352 - 353 75 Saudi Arabia ........................................................................ 354 - 355 75 Spain .................................................................................... 356 - 357 76 Sri Lanka .............................................................................. 358 - 370 77 Sudan ................................................................................... 371 - 373 79 Tajikistan ............................................................................. 374 - 375 80 E/CN.4/2001/9/Add.1 page 4 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page Tunisia ................................................................................. 376 - 378 80 Turkey .................................................................................. 379 - 380 81 United Arab Emirates .......................................................... 381 - 384 81 United States of America ..................................................... 385 - 409 82 Uzbekistan ........................................................................... 410 - 418 88 Venezuela ............................................................................ 419 - 422 90 Yemen .................................................................................. 423 - 425 91 Yugoslavia ........................................................................... 426 - 427 91 Zambia ................................................................................. 428 - 433 92 Zimbabwe ............................................................................ 434 - 435 92 B. Other ............................................................................................. 436 - 437 93 Palestinian Authority ........................................................... 436 - 437 93 E/CN.4/2001/9/Add.1 page 5 Introduction 1. This addendum to the report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions describes 63 country situations and gives an account of actions undertaken by the Special Rapporteur between 13 December 1999 and 15 December 2000. It also contains in summary form the replies received from Governments to her communications, as well as observations of the Special Rapporteur where considered appropriate. 2. Owing to restrictions on the length of documents, the Special Rapporteur has been obliged to reduce considerably details of communications sent and received. As a result, requests from Governments to publish their replies in their totality could not be acceded to. For the same reason, responses from sources to requests of the Special Rapporteur, although of great importance to her work, are reflected only very briefly in the report. SUMMARY OF CASES TRANSMITTED AND REPLIES RECEIVED A. Countries Albania 3. The Special Rapporteur received a reply from the Government of Albania to a previous communication concerning the death of Mr. Agron Pasha, reported in last year’s report to the Commission. 4. By letter dated 11 February 2000 the Government of Albania informed the Special Rapporteur that all the facts mentioned in her communication were correct. According to the Government, referring to the medical-legal expertise, Agron Pasha’s death was due to “severe injuries caused by weapons”. 5. The Government reported that the relatives of the victim had submitted a complaint to the police station in Fier, which was sent immediately to the General Prosecutor’s Office. Investigations were carried out by the Prosecutor’s Office of Fier District, which is the responsible authority for the investigation of this case, in cooperation with the Judicial Police of the Police Commissariat of Fier. The responsible judicial authority is the Supreme Court of Fier. 6. The case was still under investigation. The Government had ordered the arrest of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tamilfile Jan15.Qxd
    Tamil File 16th dec - 15th Jan. - 2006 News and Events LTTE urges Norway in Tamil perspective to initiate steps to restore normalcy oting that the Tamil people have been highly pertubed over the brutal rape and the murder of Tharshini NIlayathamby in Punguduthivu, and the military-unleashed violence on the peaceful demonstration where the Vice Chancellor of the Jaffna Univeristy was attacked and a lecturer was shot, has created "tension, panic and uncontrollable civilian unrest," the Political Head of the Liberation Tigers, Mr. S.P.Thamilchelvan has called for meaningful steps on the part of the Norwegian facilitators and the International Community in a letter addressed to the Norwegian Ambassador, Mr. Hans Brattskar on Wednesday. "The international community has a moral obligation to prevail upon the government to pull back its forces into the barracks and bring about normalcy in the life of the peace loving people," the LTTE Political Head has told the Norwegian Ambassador. Assassination is a Blow to the Peace Process - Tamil National Alliance - The Tamil National Alliance (TNA) accused the Sri Lankan state for the assassination of Mr. Joseph Pararajasingham. TNA said that the assassination raises serious doubts in regard to the genuineness of the Government's commitment to the honest and purposeful pursuit of the peace process. "We consider it our duty to point out that the assassination of Mr. Pararajasingham, a Tamil leader unequivocally committed to the resolution of the Tamil question by peaceful means is a serious blow to the credibility of the peace process," the Leaders of the Tamil Parliamentary alliance said.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2001/73/Add.1 13 February 2001 Original: ENGLISH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Fifty-seventh session Item 12 (a) of the provisional agenda INTEGRATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF WOMEN AND THE GENDER PERSPECTIVE: VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Ms. Radhika Coomaraswamy, in accordance with Commission on Human Rights resolution 2000/45 Addendum Communications to and from Governments* * The executive summary of this report and the confidential information form (see appendix) are being circulated in all official languages. The report itself is contained in the annex to the executive summary and is being circulated in the language of submission only. GE.01-11089 (E) E/CN.4/2001/73/Add.1 page 2 Executive summary At its fifty-fifth session, the Commission on Human Rights, in its resolution 2000/45, requested all Governments to cooperate with and assist the Special Rapporteur in the performance of the tasks and duties mandated, to supply all information requested and to respond to the Special Rapporteur’s visits and communications. The Commission, furthermore, welcomed the efforts by the Special Rapporteur to seek information from Governments concerning specific cases of alleged violence, in order to identify and investigate situations of violence against women, its causes and consequences, in particular, where appropriate, by sending joint urgent action appeals and communications with other special rapporteurs. The Special Rapporteur has produced a standard reporting form which may be used to document alleged instances of violence against women (see appendix).
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Overview
    ASIA 165 OVERVIEW In East and Southeast Asia, govern- India; the aftermath of the October 1999 coup ments relied on Asian initiatives during the in Pakistan; the continuing restrictions on year to address economic, political, and hu- Aung San Suu Kyi in Burma; Indonesia’s man rights issues. Gone was the rhetoric of failure to stop militia violence in West Timor; “Asian values” with its pre-financial crisis the obstructions placed by Cambodia in the premise that economic development and pro- way of a tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge; the tection of individuals rights were incompat- arrests of political and religious activists in ible. In its place was simply a determination, China; or the coup and hostage crisis in Fiji in from democratic and authoritarian govern- May. In all these countries, domestic political ments alike, to show that solutions to Asian imperatives far outweighed any fear of inter- problems were to be found within the region, national reaction, and as it turned out, there despite the diversity of cultures and political was not much to fear from donors worried interests involved. South Asia, as always, that pressure would inflict more damage on was a region apart, so divided by rivalries and themselves than on the offending country. security concerns that regional cooperation Unlike the years immediately prior to was all but impossible. the financial crisis when East and Southeast On the economic side, one example of Asian governments steadfastly refrained from East Asian regionalism was the movement criticizing each other (South Asian govern- toward developing the equivalent of an Asian ments felt no such hesitation), Asian region- Monetary Fund involving China, Japan, South alism in 2000 was more accommodating of Korea and the ten countries of the Associa- different viewpoints.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Pepper, Cinnamon, Cardamom, Ginger and Turmeric) in Sri Lanka A.P
    Challenges and Opportunities in Value Chain of Spices in South Asia Editors Pradyumna Raj Pandey Indra Raj Pandey December 2017 SAARC Agriculture Centre ICAR- Indian Institute of Spices Research i Challenges and Opportunities in Value Chain of Spices in South Asia Regional Expert Consultation Meeting on Technology sharing of spice crops in SAARC Countries, 11-13 September 2017, SAARC Agriculture Centre, Dhaka, Bangaldesh Editors Pradyumna Raj Pandey Senior Program Specialist (Crops) SAARC Agriculture Centre, Dhaka, Bangladesh Indra Raj Pandey Senior Horticulturist (Vegetable and Spice Crop specialist) CEAPRED Foundation, Nepal 2017 © 2017 SAARC Agriculture Centre Published by the SAARC Agriculture Centre (SAC), South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, BARC Complex, Farmgate, New Airport Road, Dhaka-1215, Bangladesh (www.sac.org.bd) All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise without prior permission of the publisher Citation: Pandey P.R. and Pandey, I.R., (eds.). 2017. Challenges and Opportunities in Value Chain of Spices in South Asia. SAARC Agriculture Centre, p. 200. This book contains the papers and proceedings of the regional Expert Consultation on Technology sharing of spice crops in SAARC Countries, 11-13 September in ICAR-IISR, Calicut, Kerala, India. The focal point experts represented the respective SAARC Member States. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not imply any opinion whatsoever on the part of SAC, especially concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission of Inquiry to Investigate the Involuntary Removal Or Disappearances of Persons in the Western, Southern and Sabaragamuwa Provinces As Well As Mr M.C.M
    In exploring what constitutes a veritable minefield of contentious information in the current context in Sri Lanka, the author is indebted to Dr J. de Almeida Guneratne P.C., former Commissioner, 1994 Presidential Commission of Inquiry to Investigate the Involuntary Removal or Disappearances of Persons in the Western, Southern and Sabaragamuwa Provinces as well as Mr M.C.M. Iqbal, former Secretary to two Presidential Commissions of Inquiry into Involuntary Removal or Disappearances of Persons, with whom the perspectives of this research were shared. Research assistance was rendered by attorneys-at-law Prameetha Abeywickrema and Palitha de Silva, who also conducted interviews relevant to the analysis. Roger Normand, John Tyynela and Ian Seiderman of ICJ edited the report and provided invaluable substantive input and constant encouragement, which is deeply appreciated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
    [Show full text]
  • Peoples Tribunal on Sri Lanka, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland 14-16 January 2010
    Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Peoples’ Tribunal on Sri Lanka 1 Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Peoples’ Tribunal on Sri Lanka Copyright © Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal & The International Human Rights Association - Bremen 2014 The International Human Rights Association - Bremen (IMRV) wishes to state, that the copyright for printing and publishing of all languages of the findings document of the People's Tribunal on Sri Lanka (PTSL) rests solely with the Permanent People's Tribunal (PPT) and the IMRV. Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Founder Lelio Basso (Italy) President Salvatore Senese (Italy) General Secretary Gianni Tognoni (Italy) Fondazione Lelio Basso Sezione Internazionale, Via della Dogana Vecchia, 5 - 00186 Roma, Italia Tel/Fax: 0039 066877774 E-mail:[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Web: http://www.internazionaleleliobasso.it 2 Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Peoples’ Tribunal on Sri Lanka Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Peoples’ Tribunal on Sri Lanka 07-10 December 2013 HOSTED BY Gemeindezentrum und Kirche St. Pauli Bremen, Germany ORGANIZED BY International Human Rights Association - Bremen [email protected] Irish Forum for Peace in Sri Lanka [email protected] CONDUCTED BY Permanent People’s Tribunal Fondazione Lelio Basso Sezione Internazionale Via della Dogana Vecchia 5 - 00186 Roma Italia [email protected] 3 Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Peoples’ Tribunal on Sri Lanka Contents Members of the Panel 05 1. The Competence of the Permanent People’s Tribunal 07 2. The Judgment of Session I on Sri Lanka - Dublin, January 2010 09 3. Complaints 11 4. The Defence 13 5. Judgement 15 6. Recommendations 39 7. Concluding Remarks 42 8. Appendix I: Excerpts from the closing statement for the prosecution 43 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Consejo Económico Y Social E/CN.4/2001/66 25 De Enero De 2001
    NACIONES E UNIDAS Distr. GENERAL Consejo Económico y Social E/CN.4/2001/66 25 de enero de 2001 ESPAÑOL Original: ESPAÑOL/FRANCÉS INGLÉS COMISIÓN DE DERECHOS HUMANOS 57º período de sesiones Tema 11 a) del programa provisional DERECHOS CIVILES Y POLÍTICOS, INCLUIDAS CUESTIONES RELATIVAS A: TORTURA Y DETENCIÓN Informe presentado por el Relator Especial, Sir Nigel Rodley, en cumplimiento de la resolución 2000/43 de la Comisión de Derechos Humanos* * El resumen ejecutivo del presente informe se distribuye en todos los idiomas oficiales. El informe en sí figura en el anexo del resumen ejecutivo y se distribuye sólo en los idiomas en que fue presentado. GE.01-10685 (S) E/CN.4/2001/66 página 2 Resumen ejecutivo El Relator Especial, Sir Nigel Rodley, presenta a la Comisión su octavo informe. El capítulo I se refiere a los aspectos del mandato y a los métodos de trabajo. El capítulo II resume las actividades del Relator Especial en 2000. El capítulo III contiene un resumen de las comunicaciones enviadas por el Relator Especial y las respuestas de los gobiernos, de 15 de diciembre de 1999 al 15 de diciembre de 2000. El Relator Especial transmitió información o recibió respuestas respecto de 100 países. Envió 164 llamamientos urgentes a favor de más de 470 personas identificadas. En el presente informe se incluyen observaciones del Relator Especial sobre la situación relacionada con las denuncias de tortura en varios países. Durante el período que se examina, el Relator Especial realizó dos misiones. El informe sobre la visita a Azerbaiyán (7 a 15 de mayo) figura en la adición 1 al presente informe; y el informe sobre la visita al Brasil (20 de agosto a 12 de septiembre) en la adición 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations Report
    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2001/66 25 January 2001 Original: ENGLISH/FRENCH/ SPANISH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Fifty-seventh session Item 11 (a) of the provisional agenda CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS INCLUDING THE QUESTIONS OF TORTURE AND DETENTION Report of the Special Rapporteur, Sir Nigel Rodley, submitted pursuant to Commission on Human Rights resolution 2000/43* * The executive summary of this report is being circulated in all official languages. The report itself is contained in the annex to the executive summary and is being issued in the languages of submission only. GE.01-10682 (E) E/CN.4/2001/66 page 2 Executive summary The Special Rapporteur, Sir Nigel Rodley, submits his eighth report to the Commission. Chapter I deals with aspects of the mandate and methods of work. Chapter II summarizes his activities in 2000. Chapter III contains a summary of communications sent by the Special Rapporteur and replies from Governments, from 15 December 1999 to 15 December 2000. The Special Rapporteur transmitted information to or received responses from 100 countries. He sent 164 urgent appeals on behalf of more than 470 identified individuals. Observations by the Special Rapporteur on the situation with respect to allegations of torture in several countries are included in the report. During the period under review the Special Rapporteur undertook two missions. The report on the visit to Azerbaijan (7-15 May) is contained in Addendum 1 to the present report and the report on the visit to Brazil (20 August-12 September) in Addendum 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Consejo Económico Y Social
    NACIONES UNIDAS E Consejo Económico Distr. GENERAL y Social E/CN.4/2003/75/Add.2 14 de enero de 2003 ESPAÑOL Original: INGLÉS COMISIÓN DE DERECHOS HUMANOS 59º período de sesiones Tema 12 a) del programa provisional INTEGRACIÓN DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS DE LA MUJER Y LA PERSPECTIVA DE GÉNERO: LA VIOLENCIA CONTRA LA MUJER Informe de la Relatora Especial sobre la violencia contra la mujer, sus causas y consecuencias, Sra. Radhika Coomaraswamy, presentado de conformidad con la resolución 2002/52 de la Comisión de Derechos Humanos Adición Comunicaciones enviadas a los gobiernos y recibidas de éstos* * El resumen de este informe y el formulario confidencial (véase el apéndice) se distribuyen en todos los idiomas oficiales. El informe figura anexo al resumen y se distribuye en los idiomas en los que se presentó solamente. GE.03-10403 (S) 050203 280203 E/CN.4/2003/75/Add.2 página 2 Resumen En su 58º período de sesiones, la Comisión de Derechos Humanos, en su resolución 2002/52, pidió a todos los gobiernos que prestaran su colaboración y asistencia a la Relatora Especial en el desempeño de las tareas y funciones que se le habían encomendado, que le proporcionaran toda la información solicitada y que respondieran a las comunicaciones y visitas de la Relatora Especial. Por otra parte, la Comisión celebró los esfuerzos realizados por la Relatora Especial para solicitar información a los gobiernos sobre casos específicos de presunta violencia, a fin de determinar e investigar situaciones concretas de violencia contra la mujer, sus causas y consecuencias, en particular, cuando procediera, mediante llamamientos y comunicaciones urgentes con otros relatores especiales.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide Against the Tamil People MASSACRES, POGROMS, DESTRUCTION of PROPERTY, SEXUAL VIOLENCE and ASSASINATIONS of CIVIL SOCIETY LEADERS
    Genocide against the Tamil People MASSACRES, POGROMS, DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY, SEXUAL VIOLENCE AND ASSASINATIONS OF CIVIL SOCIETY LEADERS Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide: Article 2 (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part” Introduction Discussing Raphael Lemkin’s contribution in drafting the UN Convention on Genocide, William Schabas writes: “Lemkin’s broad view of the nature of genocide was reflected in the original draft convention, proposed by Saudi Arabia in late 1946. Article I contemplated mass killing, destruction of ‘the essential potentialities of life’, ‘planned disintegration of the political, social or economic structure’, ‘systematic moral debasement’ and ‘acts of terrorism committed for the purpose of creating a state of common danger and alarm…..with the intent of producing [the group’s] political, social , economic or moral disintegration.’1 Lemkin’s thinking on the crime of genocide demonstrates much broader understanding about the nature of the crime apart from reflecting his deep sensitivity towards the plight of the victim group. At the same time, his long and detailed formulations – which were largely left out in the final draft – clearly manifested his determination to avoid leaving any loophole that would allow perpetrators to walk free. Lemkin’s fears seem to be well justified when we scrutinise the UN Convention’s track record in terms of practical applicability and preventive capacity since its adoption in 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • State Violence in Sri Lanka ALTERNATIVE REPORT to the UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE
    State Violence in Sri Lanka ALTERNATIVE REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE CENTRE FOR RULE OF LAW SRI LANKA A project coordinated by PAT . World Organisation Against Torture Case postale 21- 8, rue du Vieux Billard PEOPLE AGAINST TORTURE CH-1211 Geneva 8, Switzerland SRI LANKA World Organisation Against Torture P.O. Box 21 - 8, rue du Vieux Billard CH-1211 Geneva 8, Switzerland Geneva, January 2004 ISBN 2-88477-074-7 State Violence in Sri Lanka AN ALTERNATIVE REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE In collaboration with the following organizations Families of the Disappeared (Kalape Api), Sri Lanka Human Rights and Development Centre (SETIK), Sri Lanka Janasansadaya (People’s Forum), Sri Lanka A project presented by PAT CENTRE FOR RULE OF LAW SRI LANKA PEOPLE AGAINST TORTURE SRI LANKA and coordinated by . 5 State Violence in SRI LANKA Foreword Writing alternative reports is one of the main activities of the OMCT and a vital source of information for the members of the Human Rights Committee. With these reports, it is possible to see the situation as objectively as possible and take a critical look at government action to eradicate torture. Under the aegis of the European Union and the Swiss Confederation, the “Special Procedures” program presented this report on state violence and tor- ture in Sri Lanka at the 79th session of the Human Rights Committee, which took place in Geneva from 20th October to 7th November 2003 and during which the Sri Lankan Government’s report was examined. This report was jointly prepared by the following NGOs working on the human rights situation in Sri Lanka: • Asian Legal Resource Centre (ALRC) • Centre for Rule of Law • Families of the Disappeared (Kalape Api) • Human Rights and Development Centre (SETIK) • Janasansadaya (People’s Forum) • People against Torture (PAT) Three delegates representing the coalition presented the report during the information session and shared their observations and concerns with the members of the Human Rights Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Tamil Centre for Human Rights
    TAMIL CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS – TCHR/CTDH LAW AND ORDER, JUDICIARY FAIL AND IMPUNITY PREVAILS IN SRI LANKA JUSTICE DELAYED, JUSTICE DENIED (Salient violations - many more to be added) Justice denied Month/Year Type of violation No action 1948 On 15 November 1948 Citizenship Act and the laws of disenfranchisement were enacted and adopted, the Tamils of Indian origin Tamils in the hill country (plantation Tamils) were deprived of selecting their representatives to the Parliament. More than a million plantation Tamil workers were rendered stateless. Case ignored 1956 On 5th June 1956, about 300 Tamil volunteers along with Tamil parliamentarians staged a sit down Police turn a Satyagraha (peaceful protest) on the Galle Face Green, in front of the Sri Lanka Parliament, against blind eye to this the 'Sinhala Only' Bill introduced by (Prime Minister) Bandaranaike. Satyagrahis were beaten up some riot. No inquiry; Tamil Satyagrahis were thrown into Beira Lake near the Parliament by the Sinhalese thugs. The riots no-one punished against the Tamil community was instigated by the government and actively supported by the Sinhalese organisations and Bhikkus (Buddhist priests). Killed 150 Raped 20 Injured 300 Displaced 3000 No action taken 1957 26 July an agreement known as “Banda Chelva” pact was signed between Bandaranayke and ---------- Chevanayagam. This agreement was based on a quasi federal system devolving certain powers to the Tamils in the North East provinces. 1958 In April the “Banda-Chelva” pact was unilaterally abrogated by the Prime Minister Bandaranaike due to vehement protests staged, Buddhist clergy and Sinhala political leadership. Police turn a Anti-Tamil pogrom broke out in the island.
    [Show full text]