DOCSLIB.ORG

Handbook on the Incompatibilities and Immunity of the Members of the European Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Handbook on the Incompatibilities and Immunity of the Members of the European Parliament STUDY Requested by the JURI committee Handbook on the incompatibilities and immunity of the Members of the European Parliament Authors: Roberta PANIZZA, Eeva PAVY EN Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 621.936 - March 2020 Handbook on the incompatibilities and immunity of the Members of the European Parliament Abstract Upon request by the Committee on Legal Affairs, this handbook, provided by the Constitutional Affairs, summarises, in its first part, the EU legal framework on the incompatibilities and immunity of Members of the European Parliament. Based on national reports, the second part of the handbook gives an overview, for each EU Member State, of the relevant national provisions on the composition of national governments and parliaments as well as those on national parliamentary immunities. This handbook will be updated regularly based on information received; please hold as reference the date of edition. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs. AUTHORS Roberta PANIZZA and Eeva PAVY Policy Department C - Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE Eeva PAVY EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Fabienne VAN DER ELST LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU internal policies. To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe for updates, please write to: Policy Department fo European Parliament B-1047 Brussels Email: [email protected] Manuscript completed in March 2020 © European Union, 2020 This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. © Cover image used under licence from Shutterstock.com Handbook on the incompatibilities and immunity of the Members of the European Parliament CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES 21 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS 22 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 22 PART I - EU LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON THE INCOMPATIBILITIES AND IMMUNITY OF THE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 23 1. Parliamentary immunities an overview 23 1.1. Absolute immunity for opinions and votes (Article 8 of the PPI) 24 1.2. Immunity from prosecution, arrest and detention (Article 9 of the PPI) 25 1.3. Relationship between the immunities granted by Articles 8 and 9 of the PPI and the privilege provided for by Article 7 of the PPI 26 1.4. Immunities and fundamental rights: finding the right balance 27 2. Absolute immunity for opinions and votes (Article 8 of the PPI) 29 2.1. Duration of the non-liability 29 2.2. Scope of the non-liability 30 2.2.1. 31 2.2.2. 32 2.3. Who decides whether the principle of absolute immunity applies? 34 3. Immunity from prosecution, arrest and detention (Article 9 of the PPI) 36 3.1. Duration of the immunity 37 3.2. Scope of the immunity 38 4. Procedures and general principles 40 4.1. Defence of privilege and immunities 40 4.2. Immunity procedures 42 4.2.1. Ordinary procedure for waiver or defence of immunity 42 4.2.2. Urgent procedure 43 4.3. General principles 43 5. Incompatibilities with the office of Member of the European Parliament 45 PART II - NATIONAL REPORTS 47 BELGIUM 49 1. National legal provisions determining the scope and the content of the incompatibilities as referred to by the first indent of Article 7(1) and by Article 7(2) of the 1976 Act 49 1.1 Member of the Government of a Member State. 49 1.1.1 Legal provisions on the composition of the Belgian federal government 49 1.1.2 Denomination of the members of the Belgian federal government 49 PE 621.936 3 IPOL | 1.1.3. Date of the beginning of the term of office 50 1.2. Member of a national parliament 50 1.2.1. Legal provisions on the composition of the Belgian federal parliament 50 1.2.2. Denomination of the members of the Belgian Federal Parliament 50 1.2.3. Date of the beginning of the term of office 51 1.3. National authority competent to communicate cases of incompatibility to the European Parliament 52 2. National immunities as referred to in Article 9 first paragraph point (a) of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union 53 2.1. Legal provisions on the national parliamentary immunities 53 2.1.1. Constitution 53 2.1.2. Implementing provisions 54 2.2. Scope and content of national parliamentary immunities 54 2.2.1. Non-liability principle (Article 58 of the Constitution) 54 2.2.2. Immunity (Article 59 of the Constitution) 54 2.3. National authority entitled to request the immunity of a Belgian member of the European Parliament to be waived 55 BULGARIA 56 1. National legal provisions determining the scope and the content of the incompatibilities as referred to by the first indent of Article 7(1) and by Article 7(2) of the 1976 Act 56 1.1. Member of the Government of a Member State 56 1.1.1. Legal provisions on the composition of the Bulgarian government 56 1.1.2. Denomination of the members of the Bulgarian government 56 1.1.3. Date of the beginning of the term of office 56 1.2. Member of a national parliament 57 1.2.1. Legal provisions on the composition of the Bulgarian Parliament 57 1.2.2. Denomination of the members of the Bulgarian Parliament 57 1.2.3. Date of the beginning of the term of office 57 1.3. National authority competent to communicate cases of incompatibility to the European Parliament 58 2. National immunities as referred to in Article 9 first paragraph point (a) of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union 60 2.1. Legal provisions on the national parliamentary immunities 60 2.1.1. Constitution 60 2.1.2. Implementing provisions 60 2.2. Scope and content of national parliamentary immunities 61 2.2.1. Non-liability principle (Article 69 of the Constitution) 61 4 PE 621.936 Handbook on the incompatibilities and immunity of the Members of the European Parliament 2.2.2. Immunity (Article 70 of the Constitution) 61 2.3. National authority entitled to request the immunity of a Bulgarian Member of the European Parliament to be waived 62 CZECH REPUBLIC 63 1. National legal provisions determining the scope and the content of the incompatibilities as referred to by the first indent of Article 7(1) and by Article 7(2) of the 1976 Act 63 1.1. Member of the Government of a Member State 63 1.1.1 Legal provisions on the composition of the Czech government 63 1.1.2. Denomination of the members of the Czech government 63 1.1.3. Date of the beginning of the term of office 64 1.2. Member of a national parliament 64 1.2.1. Legal provisions on the composition of the Czech Parliament 64 1.2.2. Denomination of the members of the Czech Parliament 64 1.2.3. Date of the beginning of the term of office 65 1.3. National authority competent to communicate cases of incompatibility to the European Parliament 66 2. National immunities as referred to in Article 9 first paragraph point (a) of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union 67 2.1. Legal provisions on the national parliamentary immunities 67 2.1.1. Constitution 67 2.1.2. Implementing provisions 68 2.2. Scope and content of national parliamentary immunities 68 2.2.1. Non-liability principle (Article 27(1) and (2) of the Constitution) 68 2.2.2. Immunity (Article 27(3), (4) and (5) of the Constitution) 68 2.3. National authority entitled to request the immunity of a Czech member of the European Parliament to be waived 68 DENMARK 69 1. National legal provisions determining the scope and the content of the incompatibilities as referred to by the first indent of Article 7(1) and by Article 7(2) of the 1976 Act 69 1.1. Member of the Government of a Member State 69 1.1.1. Legal provisions on the composition of the Danish government 69 1.1.2. Denomination of the members of the Danish government 69 1.1.3. Date of the beginning of the term of office 69 1.2. Member of a national parliament 70 1.2.1. Legal provisions on the composition of the Danish Parliament 70 1.2.2. Denomination of the members of the Danish Parliament 70 1.2.3. Date of the beginning of the term of office 70 PE 621.936 5 IPOL | 1.3. National authority competent to communicate cases of incompatibility to the European Parliament 71 2. National immunities as referred to in Article 9 first paragraph point (a) of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union 72 2.1. Legal provisions on the national parliamentary immunities 72 2.1.1. Constitution 72 2.1.2. Implementing provisions 72 2.2. Scope and content of national parliamentary immunities 72 2.2.1. Non-liability principle (Article 57, second sentence of the Constitutional Act)72 2.2.2. Immunity (Article 57, first sentence, of the Constitutional Act) 72 2.3. National authority entitled to request the immunity of a Danish member of the European Parliament to be waived 73 GERMANY 74 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe
    Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe Issued by the EP Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments N° 13 - November 2016 Quality of legislation stemming from the EU On 19 September 2016, the Italian Senate submitted a request to the ECPRD network concerning the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. This request was an opportunity for National Parliaments to exchange best practices on how to ensure the quality of legislation with specific regard to transposition, implementation and enforcement of EU law. From the 21 answers provided by National Parliaments it is clear that transposition and implementation of EU Law is highly unlikely to require special attention. While almost all of them are using legislative guidelines and procedures for guaranteeing high standard of general law-making, only a few have felt the need to establish special mechanisms to ensure the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. The use of legislative guidelines and procedures; the main way to ensure the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. The use of legislative guidelines and procedures appears to be the most common way for National Parliaments to ensure the quality of legislation, also the legislation stemming from the EU. It allows for good linguistic coherence in the national languages while enhancing the standardization of the law. For example, in the case of Austria, the Federal Chancellery has published specific “Legistische Richtlinien”. In Spain, the instrument used is the Regulation Guidelines adopted in the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 22 July 2005. Both Italian Chambers use Joint Guidelines on drafting of national legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement Between the United Kingdom of Great Britain And
    Luxembourg No. 1 (2019) Agreement between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on the Participation in Certain Elections of Nationals of Each Country Resident in the Territory of the Other Luxembourg, 18 June 2019 [The Agreement is not in force] Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty July 2019 CP 141 © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-1467-2 CCS0719538732 07/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG ON THE PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN ELECTIONS OF NATIONALS OF EACH COUNTRY RESIDENT IN THE TERRITORY OF THE OTHER The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, hereinafter referred to as “the Parties”;
    [Show full text]
  • Oireachtas Digest on Europe Week 29: 19 to 25 July 2021 | Ref: 28-21
    Oireachtas Digest on Europe Week 29: 19 to 25 July 2021 | Ref: 28-21 Spotlight Last Week European Parliament: EU’s capacity to anticipate and respond to health crises. The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) adopted a draft negotiating position for a new regulation on tackling serious cross-border health threats. The text will be voted by all MEPs during September’s plenary session. Independent Ethics Body: In a report endorsed by the Constitutional Affairs Committee on Wednesday, MEPs set out their views on the establishment of an independent EU Ethics Body. New EU strategy for China In a report adopted on Thursday, the Foreign Affairs Committee outlines six pillars on which the EU should build a new strategy to deal with China: cooperation on global challenges, engagement on international norms and human rights, identifying risks and vulnerabilities, building partnerships with like-minded partners, fostering strategic autonomy and defending European interests and values. Kremlin politics: In a new assessment of the direction of EU-Russia political relations, MEPs make clear the Parliament distinguishes between the Russian people and President Vladimir Putin’s regime. The latter is, they say, a “stagnating authoritarian kleptocracy led by a president-for-life surrounded by a circle of oligarchs”. Slovenian Presidency.Slovenia holds the Presidency of the Council until the end of 2021. During the week, Ministers outlined the priorities of the Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the EU to parliamentary committees, in a series of meetings. Data governance: On Thursday, the Industry, Research and Energy Committee adopted its position on the EU Data Governance Act (DGA), aimed at increasing trust in data sharing, create new EU rules on neutrality of data marketplaces and facilitate the reuse of certain data held by the public sector e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Slovenian Parliament and EU Affairs Sabina Kajnč Lange, European Institute of Public Administration
    OPAL Country Reports The Slovenian Parliament and EU Affairs Sabina Kajnč Lange, European Institute of Public Administration To cite this report: S. Kajnč Lange (2012), OPAL Country Reports: The Slovenian Parliament and EU Affairs, weblink September 2012 OPAL Country Report on the Slovenian Parliament, September 2012 OPAL Country Report on the Slovenian Parliament1 Sabina Lange, European Institute of Public Administration Acronyms: CFP Odbor za zunanjo politiko - Committee for foreign policy EAC Odbor za zadeve Evropske unije, Committee on EU Affairs (CEUA) LRNAG Zakon o odnosih med državnim zborom in vlado v zadevah Evropske unije (Law on Relations between the National Assembly and the Government in matters of the European Union) SI Slovenia RoP Rules of Procedure RoPNA Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly 1. General Position of Parliament in the Constitutional Balance of the Member State: Constitutional and institutional factors This section looks at the role of Parliament in the political system, to help us understand the relative power position of the legislature. What is the type of government in the political system of your member state? 1.1 (i.e. parliamentary or semi-presidential) Parliamentary system 1.2 Is it a uni- or bicameral Parliament? If bicameral, is one house dominant or are both equally strong? Please briefly explain. Bicameral, with Lower house (državni zbor; national assembly, Staatsversammlung) very dominant over the Upper house (državni svet; national council; Staatsrat). Upper house combines interest and regional representation. 1.3 Is the state federal, decentralized or unitary? If applicable, is it a form of assymetrical federalism? Unitary 1.4 Briefly describe the electoral system, if applicable, for each chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Access to Constitutional Justice
    Strasbourg, 27 January 2011 CDL-AD(2010)039rev. Study N° 538 / 2009 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) STUDY ON INDIVIDUAL ACCESS TO CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 85th Plenary Session (Venice, 17-18 December 2010) on the basis of comments by Mr Gagik HARUTYUNYAN (Member, Armenia) Ms Angelika NUSSBERGER (Substitute Member, Germany) Mr Peter PACZOLAY (Member, Hungary) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. http://www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2010)039 - 2 - Table of contents INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................6 GENERAL REMARKS....................................................................................................6 I. ACCESS TO CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW ...............................................................15 I.1. TYPES OF ACCESS .................................................................................................17 I.1.1. Indirect access...................................................................................................17 I.1.2. Direct access.....................................................................................................20 I.2. THE ACTS UNDER REVIEW ......................................................................................28 I.3. PROTECTED RIGHTS ..............................................................................................29 PARTIAL CONCLUSIONS OF CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • Interparliamentary Conference on the European Social Charter Turin Forum on Social Rights in Europe
    European Social Charter Turin Process Interparliamentary Conference on the European Social Charter Turin Forum on Social Rights in Europe 17 and 18 March 2016, Turin, Italy Official speeches and interventions Council of Europe The opinions expressed in this publication are the responibility of the authors and do not necessarely reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. The only official versions are those delivered orally. Reproduction of the texts in this publication is authorised provided the full title and the source, namely the Council of Europe, are cited. If they are intended to be used for commercial purposes or translated into one of the non- official languages of the Council of Europe, please contact [email protected]. Cover photo: © Shutterstock, Council of Europe Cover design: Documents and Publications Production Department (SPDP), Council of Europe© © Council of Europe, November 2016 Printed at the Council of Europe Table of Contents INTRODUCTION by Riccardo PRIORE, Coordinator of the Turin Process for the European Social Charter, Council of Europe ....................................................................................................................................................4 INTERPARLIAMENTARY CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER, 17 MARCH 2016 Official speeches.............................................................................................................................8 Piero FASSINO, Mayor of Turin, Italy..............................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • State of Populism in Europe
    2018 State of Populism in Europe The past few years have seen a surge in the public support of populist, Eurosceptical and radical parties throughout almost the entire European Union. In several countries, their popularity matches or even exceeds the level of public support of the centre-left. Even though the centre-left parties, think tanks and researchers are aware of this challenge, there is still more OF POPULISM IN EUROPE – 2018 STATE that could be done in this fi eld. There is occasional research on individual populist parties in some countries, but there is no regular overview – updated every year – how the popularity of populist parties changes in the EU Member States, where new parties appear and old ones disappear. That is the reason why FEPS and Policy Solutions have launched this series of yearbooks, entitled “State of Populism in Europe”. *** FEPS is the fi rst progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-fi nanced by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project. Policy Solutions is a progressive political research institute based in Budapest. Among the pre-eminent areas of its research are the investigation of how the quality of democracy evolves, the analysis of factors driving populism, and election research. Contributors : Tamás BOROS, Maria FREITAS, Gergely LAKI, Ernst STETTER STATE OF POPULISM Tamás BOROS IN EUROPE Maria FREITAS • This book is edited by FEPS with the fi nancial support of the European
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Note on Slovenia (PDF
    2 Briefing Research for the REGI Committee: Economic, social and territorial situation of Slovenia This briefing was prepared to provide information for the European Parliament’s Committee on Regional Development delegation to Slovenia on 3-5 April 2018. 1. Introduction to Slovenia and its political and administrative system Slovenia is located in the southern part of Central Europe. It borders Austria in the north, Croatia in the south, Italy in the west and Hungary in the east. Slovenia has access to the Adriatic Sea. With the exception of its littoral region, the country is predominantly mountainous with a continental climate. Slovenia’s coastal region has a Mediterranean climate. Its highest mountain is Triglav (2 864 m). Slovenia has the sixth smallest population and the fourth smallest territory in the European Union. Over half its territory is covered by forests. Map 1: Slovenia Source: European Parliament DG IPOL Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, European Parliament Author: Marek KOLODZIEJSKI, Research Administrator European Parliament PE 617.462 March 2018 © European Union, 2018 Slovenia joined the EU on 1 May 2004. On 1 January 2007, it became the first New Member State to join the Euro area. Slovenia is a member of both NATO (since 2004) and the OECD (since 2010). The official language is Slovenian. Table 1: Key data Slovenia Flag Total area 20 273 km2 Population (2017) 2 065 895 Population density (2015) 102.4 inhabitants per km2 EU-28 estimate: 117.1 inhabitants per km2 Language Slovenian Currency Euro Source: Eurostat Slovenia is a parliamentary democratic republic with a head of government – the Prime Minister, elected by Parliament – and a head of state – the President, elected in direct elections.
    [Show full text]
  • UUI Alm.Del Bilag 7: 2017 09 06
    Udlændinge- og Integrationsudvalget 2017-18 UUI Alm.del Bilag 7 Offentligt Promoting better regional cooperation towards smart and humane migration across the Mediterranean Conference for parliaments from the European Union and from the Mediterranean region organized jointly by the Inter-Parliamentary Union, the Parliament of Malta and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean 16-17 November 2017, Grand Hotel Excelsior - Grand Ballroom, Valletta (Malta) Mr. Orla Hav, MP President of the Danish Inter- Parliamentary Group International Department (IPU-Sekr) Folketinget - Christiansborg Slot DK-1240 COPENHAGEN K (Denmark) Geneva, 8 September 2017 Dear Mr. President, The Parliament of Malta, the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean (PAM) are pleased to invite you to the above-mentioned Conference, which will take place from 16 to 17 November 2017 in Valletta, Malta. In recent years, a growing number of people have made their way to Europe across the Mediterranean to flee on-going conflicts and repression or seek a livelihood in the absence of any economic opportunities in their countries. The magnitude and urgency of the current situation requires long-term measures to ensure that migration is governed in a fair, smart and humane way, in keeping with the Sustainable Development Goals. In this context, parliaments and their members have a critical role to play in adopting adequate legislation, in ensuring that effective policies are in place and implemented and in mobilizing public support for such actions. The Conference will explore what this means concretely for receiving, transit countries and countries of origin. It will identify steps that the parliaments of those countries can take, including through stronger regional and cross-regional coordination and cooperation, to help ensure fair, smart and humane migration.
    [Show full text]
  • Registrering Til COSAC-Møde 22.-24. April 2012
    Plenary meeting of the COSAC Réunion plénière de la COSAC Copenhagen 22-24 April 2012 Copenhague 22-24 avril 2012 List of Participants Liste des participants MEMBER STATES/ETATS MEMBRES Presidency/Présidence Denmark/ Danemark Danish Parliament/Parlement danois/Folketinget Ms Eva KJER HANSEN, Chairman of the European Affairs Committee (The Liberal Party – ALDE) Mr Benny ENGELBRECHT, Vice-chairman of the European Affairs Committee (The Social Democrats – S&D) Mr Jens JOEL, Member of the European Affairs Committee (The Social Democrats – S&D) Ms Sofie CARSTEN NIELSEN, Member of the European Affairs Committee (The Social Liberal Party – ALDE) Ms Merete RIISAGER, Member of the European Affairs Committee (Liberal Alliance) Ms Lene ESPERSEN, Member of the European Affairs Committee (The Conservative Party – EPP) Ms Pernille DELEURAN, Head of International Division Mr Mongin FORREST, EU Coordinator Mr Morten KNUDSEN, Principal EU Adviser Mr Thomas FICH, Senior EU Adviser Ms Iben SCHACKE, EU Adviser Ms Signe RIIS ANDERSEN, Clerk to the European Affairs Committee Mr Thomas SARUP, Permanent representative of the Folketing to the EU Ms Louise JUUL, Danish Folketing Representative to the COSAC Secretariat MS Birgitte WERN, Head of Interpretation 2/{20 Austria/Autriche National Council/Conseil national/Nationalrat Mr Fritz NEUGEBAUER, Second President of the National Council, Chairman of the Standing subcommittee on EU Affairs (ÖVP- Austrian People's Party – EPP) Ms Christine MUTTONEN, Vice Chairperson of the Standing subcommittee on EU Affairs (Social
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network 1-2 October 2020 List of Participants
    as of 02/10/2020 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network 1-2 October 2020 List of participants MP or Chamber or Political Party Country Parliamentary First Name Last Name Organisation Job Title Biography (MPs only) Official represented Pr. Ammar Moussi was elected as Member of the Algerian Parliament (APN) for the period 2002-2007. Again, in the year Algerian Parliament and Member of Peace Society 2017 he was elected for the second term and he's now a member of the Finance and Budget commission of the National Algeria Moussi Ammar Parliamentary Assembly Member of Parliament Parliament Movement. MSP Assembly. In addition, he's member of the parliamentary assembly of the Mediterranean PAM and member of the executif of the Mediterranean bureau of tha Arab Renewable Energy Commission AREC. Abdelmajid Dennouni is a Member of Parliament of the National People’s Assembly and a Member of finances and Budget Assemblée populaire Committee, and Vice president of parliamentary assembly of the Mediterranean. He was previously a teacher at Oran Member of nationale and Algeria Abdelmajid Dennouni Member of Parliament University, General Manager of a company and Member of the Council of Competitiveness, as well as Head of the Parliament Parliamentary Assembly organisaon of constucng, public works and hydraulics. of the Mediterranean Member of Assemblée Populaire Algeria Amel Deroua Member of Parliament WPL Ambassador for Algeria Parliament Nationale Assemblée Populaire Algeria Parliamentary official Safia Bousnane Administrator nationale Lucila Crexell is a National Senator of Argentina and was elected by the people of the province of Neuquén in 2013 and reelected in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport Élaboré Pour La Chambre Des Députés Concernant Le Référendum Sur Le Traité Établissant Une Constitution Pour L’Europe (Février 2007)
    Rapport élaboré pour la Chambre des députés concernant le référendum sur le traité établissant une Constitution pour l’Europe (février 2007) Légende: Rapport de février 2007, réalisé par les chercheurs de l’Université du Luxembourg pour la Chambre des députés du Grand-duché. Il vise à souligner et mettre en contexte les particularités du vote luxembourgeois par rapport aux autres processus référendaires. Source: DUMONT, Patrick ; FEHLEN, Fernand ; KIES, Raphaël ; POIRIER, Philippe, Le référendum sur le Traité établissant une Constitution pour l’Europe – Rapport élaboré pour la Chambre des Députés, STADE - Études sociologiques et politiques sur le Luxembourg Université du Luxembourg, Luxembourg, février 2007, http://www.chd.lu/wps/wcm/connect/a0c135804e295b92b693f7010df100bc/referendum2005.pdf?MOD=AJPERES. Copyright: (c) Chambre des Députés URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/rapport_elabore_pour_la_chambre_des_deputes_concernant_le_referendum_sur_le_traite_etabli ssant_une_constitution_pour_l_europe_fevrier_2007-fr-893c7c4c-e8a0-448c-8ed7-3d28a98e6b82.html Date de dernière mise à jour: 19/12/2013 1 / 213 19/12/2013 Le référendum sur le Traité établissant une Constitution pour l’Europe Patrick Dumont, Fernand Fehlen, Raphaël Kies et Philippe Poirier Le référendum sur le Traité établissant une Constitution pour l’Europe Rapport élaboré pour la Chambre des Députés STADE - Études sociologiques et politiques sur le Luxembourg Université du Luxembourg Luxembourg, février 2007 2 / 213 19/12/2013 Introduction 2 Ce rapport a été réalisé pour la Chambre
    [Show full text]