DOCSLIB.ORG

Metamorphosis Occ. Supp. 4 Complete.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Metamorphosis Occ. Supp. 4 Complete.Pdf LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA EXECUTIVE COUNCIL Bennie Coetzer Acting President [email protected] Alf Curle Secretary [email protected] Alf Curle Treasurer [email protected] Bennie Coetzer Stock Custodian [email protected] Peter Roos Publicity [email protected] Mark C. Williams Conservation matters [email protected] Doug Kroon Editor [email protected] Martin Krüger Transvaal Museum [email protected] Steve Collins East Africa Branch [email protected] Alan Gardiner Zimbabwe Branch [email protected] Jonathan Ball Western Cape Branch [email protected] Torben Larsen West Africa Branch [email protected] Ernest Pringle Eastern Cape Branch [email protected] Reinier Terblanche North West Branch [email protected] Steve Woodhall Gauteng Branch [email protected] EDITORIAL Editor: Doug Kroon Scientific advisers: Mark Williams, Martin Krüger, Rolf Oberprieler, Stephen Henning, Henk Geertsema, Alan Gardiner, Dick Vane-Wright, Axel Hausmann. MEMBERSHIP The aims of The Lepidopterists’ Society of Africa are to promote the scientific study and the conservation of Lepidoptera in Africa, and to provide a communication forum for all people who are interested in African Lepidoptera. Metamorphosis, which is the official journal of the Society, publishes original scientific papers as well as articles of a less technical nature. Membership of the Society is open to all persons who are interested in the study of Lepidoptera. There is no geographical limit to membership. There are four categories of membership: South Africa Rest of Africa Overseas Surface mail Air mail Sponsor Member R500.00 pa R500.00 pa R500.00 pa US$ 200.00pa Full Member R100.00 pa R125.00 pa R150.00 pa US$ 45.00 pa Juniors & pensioners R72.00 pa R87.50 pa R105.00 pa US$ 22.50 pa Affiliate members (Societies, R105.00 pa R125.00 pa R150.00 US$ 45.00 pa Museums, Schools etc.) Back issues of Metamorphosis are still available @ R20.00 per copy or US$12.00 for outside South Africa. Fees for outside South Africa are higher due to increased postage. Membership is annual per calendar year and fees are due on January 1 of each year. CORRESPONDENCE General: The Hon. Secretary, P. O. Box 477, Jukskei Park, 2153, South Africa, e-mail - [email protected] Metamorphosis: The Editor, P. O. Box 572, Sasolburg, 9570, South Africa. e-mail - [email protected] Membership fees: The Hon. Treasurer, P. O. Box 477, Jukskei Park, 2153, South Africa, e-mail - [email protected] Covers: Panoramic view of Kaya Muhaka forest edge; inset: side view of Charaxes lasti September 2000 METAMORPHOSIS Occasional Supplement 4 1 __________________________________________________________________ PRELIMINARY SURVEY ON BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS AND THEIR HABITATS IN TWO KAYA FORESTS OF THE KENYA COAST INGO LEHMANN a and ESTHER KIOKO b a Uferweg 30, 23996 Bad Kleinen, Germany b Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya ABSTRACT:The forest stratification, plant, butterfly and larger moth diversity of Kaya Muhaka and Kaya Kinondo (Kenya, Coast, Kwale District) are described. Both Kayas have old secondary forest patches and are certainly not unmodified relics. The Lepidopteran fauna includes species not previously recorded from Kenya or from coastal Kenya and was diverse in Kaya Muhaka. The Shimba Hills were found to be the potential source for the butterfly faunas of both Kayas. Together, all three areas support c. 30% of the total Kenyan butterfly fauna. 23% are coastal endemics and only 1.6% of species have a central and western Africa distribution. In contrast, for example 18–21% of plant species with a central and western Africa (Guineo-Congolian) distribution occur in Kaya Muhaka. Butterfly conservation priority is recommended all habitats in the Shimba Hills and for nearby coastal forests. INTRODUCTION Objective The main aim of the 1994 and 1996–1998 field work was to study as intensively as possible two coastal forests1 south of Mombasa, namely Kaya Muhaka and Kaya Kinondo, with the hope of throwing some light on the butterfly and moth fauna and their habitats. For both Kayas, no equivalent survey exists. Most of the information and data presented here is based on our report (Lehmann & Kioko, 1998). All information collected is not yet completely analyzed. Therefore, the objective of this article is to give a preliminary survey of the Lepidoptera fauna and their habitats, namely the forest stratification and floristic composition. In addition to our report a comparison with the butterfly fauna of the Shimba Hills will be done here and is based on our assessment of the data published by Sevastopulo (1973/1974). The Shimba Hills were chosen for comparison because they are close to both Kayas, constitute the largest coastal forest block in Kenya south of Mombasa and are a potential source area. Distributions of butterflies and moths in the lowland forests of the Afrotropical region The Afrotropical Region (Crosskey & White 1977) has a butterfly fauna that consists of 301 genera and of some 3607 known species (Ackery et al. 1995). Of these c. 56% are restricted to forests (de Jong & Congdon 1993). 1 In this article the term “forest“ will be applied according to White (1983) for a continuous stand of trees with a canopy that varies in height from 10 m or more. The term “coastal forest“ will be used after Hawthorne (1993) for forest in the coast which is “ ... the land over the sedimentary (and intrusive volcanic) rocks of the coastal plains and plateau, to the east of the exposed basement complex land.“ 2 METAMORPHOSIS Occasional Supplement 4 September 2000 ___________________________________________________________________ Largely based on the publication by Carcasson (1964), Ackery et al. (1995) stated, that within this region, the greatest density of butterfly species occurs in the forests below 1500 m. These lowland forests are “very much poorer“ in species in eastern Africa, although their butterfly fauna shows “unmistakable affinities“ with the species rich western lowland forest fauna. The impoverishment of the eastern forests “must have been due to their extreme fragmentation and reduction during interpluvial phases ... and to the tenuous and shortlived character of recent connections with the western forest reservoir.“ The occurrence of numerous endemic species and distinct subspecies in the lowland forests of eastern Africa suggests that broad based links have only been possible in the remote past. 400 Forest butterfly species, of which 79 species are endemic, inhabit the “eastern African coastal forests“ (Burgess et al. 1998). For the Lepidoptera of the Afrotropical region major eco-geographic sub-regions were proposed by Carcasson (1964). The Sylvan sub-region, Lowland forest division, includes the Eastern sub-division (Coastal forest zone) which comprises all the lowland forest to the east of the eastern tablelands, from Kenya to Zululand (Natal, South Africa). In Kenya, lowland forests occur mainly along the coast and in western Kenya. Larsen (1991) stated that “870 or so“ butterfly species occur in Kenya and of these, c. 400 species could be found in the Kakamega area (western Kenya) alone. Only “a small group of species“ is found in all the forest zones from Senegal to coastal Tanzania and Kenya. But “a very large proportion“ of the coastal forest species are endemic to the East African coast, including few limited to the Kenya and/or Tanzania coast, and the bulk of these endemics have close relatives in the equitorial forests. Larsen mentioned that it would appear that there has been contact between forests of western Africa and the coastal forests at various times in the Miocene or early Pliocene, as well as at a more recent date, probably through southern Tanzania and Malawi. Lovett (1993) also discussed the links between the forests of western and eastern Africa and pointed out that they existed possibly only during wet periods and that the relatively stable and warm climate of the Indian Ocean during the last 2.3 Myrallowing the survival of western (Guineo-Congolian) relict endemic species. Collins & Larsen (1996) stated that “some 30 species have been added to the Kenyan list“. Congdon & Collins (1998) mentioned “approximate[ly] 895“ butterfly species for Kenya and listed 25 endemic species. Their figures indicate that Kenya has a substantially lower species richness compared with Tanzania where c.1370 species including 121 endemics occur and Uganda with c. 1242 species and 34 endemics. There is little knowledge about the distributions of moth species in the lowland forests of the Afrotropical region. Coastal Forests: their Status and Significance The coastal areas of East Africa and the western Indian Ocean contain some of the world’s richest ecosystems and provide valueable resources for over 30 million people, but the intensity and nature of human activities increasingly threatens their productivity and biological diversity (Lindén 1993; Richmond 1998). This is partly dfue to a high steady population increase (Goliber 1985). Today, the coastal forests of eastern Africa are a refuge for a wide variety of plant species (Brenan 1978; White 1983; Hawthorne 1993) and an important, highly threatened centre of endemism for plants, mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs, butterflies, snails and millipedes (Burgess et al. 1998). September 2000 METAMORPHOSIS Occasional Supplement 4 3 __________________________________________________________________ Kenya2 has the most diverse forests in East Africa (IUCN/WCMC, 1992). Its coastal forests support the highest diversities of flora (Beentje 1988; Robertson & Luke 1993; Wass 1995) and fauna (Bennun 1995; Waiyaki 1995; Bennun & Njoroge 1999). The flora is part of the Zanzibar-Inhambane regional mosaic (Moll & white 1978; White 1983). Coastal forests occupy c. 660 km2 in Kenya of which the largest is Arabuko-Sokoke with 370 km2, but the majority is smaller than 5 km2 (Burgess et al. 1998). They are located within 30-50 km inland from the Indian Ocean – except for those within the forest belt of the Tana River floodplain (Andrews et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009
    Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Fauna Conservation Department Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden 29 June 2010 Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden Publication Series: No 6 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve moth survey 2009 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Executive Summary The objective of this survey was to generate a moth species list for the Butterfly Reserve and Site of Special Scientific Interest [SSSI] at Fung Yuen, Tai Po, Hong Kong. The survey came about following a request from Tai Po Environmental Association. Recording, using ultraviolet light sources and live traps in four sub-sites, took place on the evenings of 24 April and 16 October 2009. In total, 825 moths representing 352 species were recorded. Of the species recorded, 3 meet IUCN Red List criteria for threatened species in one of the three main categories “Critically Endangered” (one species), “Endangered” (one species) and “Vulnerable” (one species” and a further 13 species meet “Near Threatened” criteria. Twelve of the species recorded are currently only known from Hong Kong, all are within one of the four IUCN threatened or near threatened categories listed. Seven species are recorded from Hong Kong for the first time. The moth assemblages recorded are typical of human disturbed forest, feng shui woods and orchards, with a relatively low Geometridae component, and includes a small number of species normally associated with agriculture and open habitats that were found in the SSSI site. Comparisons showed that each sub-site had a substantially different assemblage of species, thus the site as a whole should retain the mosaic of micro-habitats in order to maintain the high moth species richness observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Madagascar's Lemurs
    Madagascar's Lemurs Naturetrek Tour Report 21 September - 4 October 2019 Indri by Cathy Harlow Verreaux's Sifaka by Cathy Harlow Ring-tailed Lemur by Luis Henriques de Lancastre Zombitse Sportive Lemur by Luis Henriques de Lancastre Report by Cathy Harlow Images courtesy of Luis Henriques de Lancastre & Cathy Harlow Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Madagascar's Lemurs Tour participants: Cathy Harlow (Leader) and Parson (Local guide) with 11 Naturetrek clients Day 1 Saturday 21st September London Heathrow to Addis Ababa Most of our group met up at Heathrow Airport at check-in and in the departure lounge. We discovered our flight to Addis Ababa with Ethiopian Airlines was delayed due to the late arrival of the incoming aircraft but finally we were airborne on the overnight flight. Day 2 Sunday 22nd September Addis Ababa to Antananarivo As we began our descent, it was clear we’d have a very tight transfer to make our onward flight connection, as would most of the other passengers on the flight. Ethiopian Airlines rose to the challenge however, and when we landed directed us to a fleet of buses, each duly depositing passengers at the right aircraft, without even going into the terminal. Once on board we met Luis, the last member of our group who had flown from Zurch, and were swiftly on our way. We arrived on time at Antananarivo Airport, where immigration formalities were slightly better organised than on previous visits.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Page LIST OF ACRONYMS a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Scope of Study 1 1.2 Background – Volta River Authority 2 1.3 Proposed Aboadze-Volta Transmission Line Project (AVTP) 3 1.4 Legal, Regulatory and Policy Considerations 5 1.5 Future developments by VRA 8 2.0 Description of proposed development 10 2.1 Pre-Construction Activities 11 2.2 Construction Phase Activities 12 2.3 Operational Phase Activities 17 2.3.1 Other Operational Considerations 20 3.0 Description of Existing Environments 21 3.1 Bio-Physical Environment 21 3.1.1 Climate 21 3.1.2 Flora 25 3.1.3 Fauna 35 3.1.4 Water Resources 43 3.1.5 Geology and Soils 44 3.1.6 General Land Use 51 3.2 Socio-Economic/Cultural Environment 51 3.2.1 Methodology 53 3.2.2 Profiles of the Districts in the Project Area 54 3.2.2(a) Shama - Ahanta East Metropolitan Area 54 3.2.2(b) Komenda - Edina - Eguafo - Abirem (KEEA) District 58 i 3.2.2(c) Mfantseman District 61 3.2.2(d) Awutu-Effutu-Senya District 63 3.2.2(e) Tema Municipal Area 65 3.2.2(f) Abura-Asebu-Kwamankese 68 3.2.2(g) Ga District 71 3.2.2(h) Gomoa District 74 3.3 Results of Socio-Economic Surveys 77 (Communities, Persons and Property) 3.3.1 Information on Affected Persons and Properties 78 3.3.1.1 Age Distribution of Affected Persons 78 3.3.1.2 Gender Distribution of Affected Persons 79 3.3.1.3 Marital Status of Affected Persons 80 3.3.1.4 Ethnic Composition of Afected Persons 81 3.3.1.5 Household Size/Dependents of Affected Persons 81 3.3.1.6 Religious backgrounds of Affected Persons 82 3.3.2 Economic Indicators
    [Show full text]
  • Western Ghats), Idukki District, Kerala, India
    International Journal of Entomology Research International Journal of Entomology Research ISSN: 2455-4758 Impact Factor: RJIF 5.24 www.entomologyjournals.com Volume 3; Issue 2; March 2018; Page No. 114-120 The moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of vagamon hills (Western Ghats), Idukki district, Kerala, India Pratheesh Mathew, Sekar Anand, Kuppusamy Sivasankaran, Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu* Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract The present study was conducted at Vagamon hill station to evaluate the biodiversity of moths. During the present study, a total of 675 moth specimens were collected from the study area which represented 112 species from 16 families and eight super families. Though much of the species has been reported earlier from other parts of India, 15 species were first records for the state of Kerala. The highest species richness was shown by the family Erebidae and the least by the families Lasiocampidae, Uraniidae, Notodontidae, Pyralidae, Yponomeutidae, Zygaenidae and Hepialidae with one species each. The results of this preliminary study are promising; it sheds light on the unknown biodiversity of Vagamon hills which needs to be strengthened through comprehensive future surveys. Keywords: fauna, lepidoptera, biodiversity, vagamon, Western Ghats, Kerala 1. Introduction Ghats stretches from 8° N to 22° N. Due to increasing Arthropods are considered as the most successful animal anthropogenic activities the montane grasslands and adjacent group which consists of more than two-third of all animal forests face several threats (Pramod et al. 1997) [20]. With a species on earth. Class Insecta comprise about 90% of tropical wide array of bioclimatic and topographic conditions, the forest biomass (Fatimah & Catherine 2002) [10].
    [Show full text]
  • Noctuoidea: Erebidae: Others
    Staude et al. / Metamorphosis 27: S165–S188 S165 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Noctuoidea: Erebidae: Others Reference/ Lepidoptera Host plant Locality rearing no. Taxon Subfamily Family Taxon Family M1148 Anoba angulilinea Anobinae Erebidae Dalbergia Fabaceae Tshukudu Game melanoxylon Reserve, Hoedspruit M998 Anoba atripuncta Anobinae Erebidae Ormocarpum Fabaceae Tshukudu Game trichocarpum Reserve, Hoedspruit Gv71 Baniana arvorum Anobinae Erebidae Elephantorrhiza Fabaceae Steenkoppies, farm, elephantina Magaliesburg 14HSS52 Baniana arvorum Anobinae Erebidae Elephantorrhiza Fabaceae Steenkoppies, farm, elephantina Magaliesburg 13HSS84 Plecoptera arctinotata Anobinae Erebidae Senegalia caffra Fabaceae Steenkoppies, farm, Magaliesburg M1020a Plecoptera flaviceps Anobinae Erebidae Dalbergia Fabaceae Casketts, farm, melanoxylon Hoedspruit M317 Bareia incidens Calpinae Erebidae Ficus lutea Moraceae Casketts, farm, (unplaced as to Hoedspruit tribe) 14HSS87 Egnasia vicaria Calpinae Erebidae Afrocanthium Rubiaceae Dlinsa Forest, (unplaced as to mundianum Eshowe tribe) 12HSS163 Exophyla multistriata Calpinae Erebidae Celtis africana Cannabaceae Golden Valley, (unplaced as to Magaliesburg tribe) M416 Exophyla multistriata Calpinae Erebidae Trema orientalis Cannabaceae Sekororo, Tzaneen (unplaced as to (Fed on Celtis tribe) africana) M743 Lacera alope Calpinae Erebidae Pterolobium Fabaceae Moholoholo Rehab (unplaced as to stellatum Centre, Hoedspruit tribe)
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Seismic Reflection Survey and Well Drilling, Umkhanyakude District Municipality, Northern Kzn
    SFG1897 v2 Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SEISMIC REFLECTION SURVEY AND WELL DRILLING, UMKHANYAKUDE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN KZN Public Disclosure Authorized Client: SANEDI–SACCCS Consultant: G.A. Botha (PhD, Pr.Sci.Nat) in association with specialist consultants; Brousse-James and Associates, WetRest, Jeffares & Green, S. Allan Council for Geoscience, P.O. Box 900, Pietermaritzburg, 3200 Council for Geoscience report: 2016-0009 June, 2016 Copyright © Council for Geoscience, 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Project description ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Location and regional context ....................................................................................................... 5 2.2 2D seismic reflection survey and well drilling; project description and technical aspects ............ 7 2.2.1 Seismic survey (vibroseis) process ....................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Well drilling ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Butterflies in Dinosaur National Monument
    VOLUME 37, NUMBER 1 91 Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 37(1), 1983, 91 SPECIES OF EUCALYPTUS AS FOOD PLANTS FOR LEPIDOPTERA IN EAST AFRICA Dr. 1. F. B. Common's paper, "Some factors responsible for imbalances in the Aus­ tralian fauna of Lepidoptera" (1981, J. Lepid. Soc. 34:286-294), and his remarks on the role of Eucalyptus as a lepidopterous food plant suggest that a list of the Lepidoptera feeding on the introduced Eucalyptus spp. in East Africa might be of interest. Various species of Eucalyptus are grown in many parts of East Africa, primarily as sources of firewood but also as useful agents in the reclamation of swampy land. E. citriodora is grown as a plantation crop in Zaire and elsewhere for its oil, used in the perfumery trade. The following is a list of species recorded as feeding on species of Eucalyptus: Lymantriidae-Euproctis molunduana Auriv., Dasychira georgiana Fawcett, D. basa­ lis Wlk., Argyrostagma niobe Weymer; Lasiocampidae---Lechriolepis nigrivenis Strand, Bombycopsis bipars Wlk., Nadiasa cuneata Distant, Pachypasa subfascia Wlk., P. pa­ pyri Tams, Eucraera salambo Vuillot; Saturniidae-Bunaea alcinoe Stoll, Nudaurelia conradsi Rebel, N. cytherea F., N. dione F., N. krucki Hering, N. gueinzii Karsch, Lobobunaea phaedusa Drury, Urota sinope Westwood, Athletes ethra Westwood; No­ todontidae-Desmeocraera varia Janse; Limacodidae-Latoia chapmanni Kirby; Psychidae-Eumeta rougeoti Bourgogne, Kotochalia junodi Hylaerts; Noctuidae­ Euxoa longidentifera Hampson, Spodoptera littoralis Bdv., Heliothis armigera (Hbn.), Anua mejanesi Gn., A. tirhaca Cramer, Achaea lienardi Bdv., A. catella Gn., A. faber Holland, PI usia limbirena Gn.; Geometridae-Orthonama obstipata F., Colocleom divisaria Wlk., Ascotis selenaria Schiff., A.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers OVERVIEW OF FOREST PESTS KENYA January 2007 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FBS/20E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department DISCLAIMER The aim of this document is to give an overview of the forest pest1 situation in Kenya. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO 2007 1 Pest: Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products (FAO, 2004). Overview of forest pests - Kenya TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Forest pests...................................................................................................................... 1 Naturally regenerating forests..................................................................................... 1 Insects ..................................................................................................................... 1 Diseases..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 156 Genus Lachnocnema Trimen
    AFROTROPICAL BUTTERFLIES. MARK C. WILLIAMS. http://www.lepsocafrica.org/?p=publications&s=atb Updated 10 March 2021 Genus Lachnocnema Trimen, 1887 Woolly Legs’ South-African butterflies: a monograph of the extra-tropical species 2 Erycinidae and Lycaenidae: 233 (242 pp.). London. Type-species: Hesperia bibulus Fabricius, by subsequent designation (Hemming, 1960. Annotationes lepidopterologicae (Part 1): 11 (7-11).). The genus Lachnocnema belongs to the Family Lycaenidae Leach, 1815; Subfamily Miletinae Reuter, 1896; Tribe Lachnocnemini Clench, 1955. The other genus in the Tribe Lachnocnemini in the Afrotropical Region is Thestor. Lachnocnema (Woolly Legs’) is a purely Afrotropical genus containing 36 species. Generic review by Libert, 1996 (in three parts). Species groups for the genus Lachnocnema (Libert, 1996a,b,c) Bibulus species group – bibulus, laches, pseudobibulus, sosia, riftensis, kiellandi Durbani species group – durbani, tanzaniensis, intermedia Abyssinica species group – abyssinica, angolanus, ducarmei, triangularis Jacksoni species group – jacksoni Emperamus species group Emperamus subgroup – emperamus, katangae, regularis, brimoides, bamptoni, obscura, overlaeti Divergens subgroup – divergens, vuattouxi, dohertyi Reutlingeri species group Reutlingeri subgroup – reutlingeri, nigrocellularis, luna, brunea, jolyana Magna subgroup – magna, albimacula Exiguus species group – exiguus Indeterminate species – disrupta, inexpectata, unicolor, congoensis Bibulus species group *Lachnocnema bibulus (Fabricius, 1793)# Common Woolly Legs
    [Show full text]
  • Issn 0972- 1800
    ISSN 0972- 1800 VOLUME 22, NO. 3 QUARTERLY JULY-SEPTEMBER, 2020 Date of Publication: 28th September, 2020 BIONOTES A Quarterly Newsletter for Research Notes and News On Any Aspect Related with Life Forms BIONOTES articles are abstracted/indexed/available in the Indian Science Abstracts, INSDOC; Zoological Record; Thomson Reuters (U.S.A); CAB International (U.K.); The Natural History Museum Library & Archives, London: Library Naturkundemuseum, Erfurt (Germany) etc. and online databases. Founder Editor Manuscripts Dr. R. K. Varshney, Aligarh, India Please E-mail to [email protected]. Board of Editors Guidelines for Authors Peter Smetacek, Bhimtal, India BIONOTES publishes short notes on any aspect of biology. Usually submissions are V.V. Ramamurthy, New Delhi, India reviewed by one or two reviewers. Jean Haxaire, Laplune, France Kindly submit a manuscript after studying the format used in this journal Vernon Antoine Brou, Jr., Abita Springs, (http://www.entosocindia.org/). Editor U.S.A. reserves the right to reject articles that do not Zdenek F. Fric, Ceske Budejovice, Czech adhere to our format. Please provide a contact Republic telephone number. Authors will be provided Stefan Naumann, Berlin, Germany with a pdf file of their publication. R.C. Kendrick, Hong Kong SAR Address for Correspondence Publication Policy Butterfly Research Centre, Bhimtal, Information, statements or findings Uttarakhand 263 136, India. Phone: +91 published are the views of its author/ source 8938896403. only. Email: [email protected] From Volume 21 Published by the Entomological Society of India (ESI), New Delhi (Nodal Officer: V.V. Ramamurthy, ESI, New Delhi) And Butterfly Research Centre, Bhimtal Executive Editor: Peter Smetacek Assistant Editor: Shristee Panthee Butterfly Research Trust, Bhimtal Published by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPH Ll
    PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPH ll Lepidoptera of American Samoa with particular reference to biology and ecology By John Adams Comstock Published by Entomology Department, Bernice P. Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawaii, U. S. A. 1966 PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPHS Published by Entomology Department, Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819, U. S. A. Editorial Committee: J. L. Gressitt, Editor (Honolulu), S. Asahina (Tokyo), R. G. Fennah (London), R. A. Harrison (Christchurch), T. C. Maa (Honolulu & Taipei), C. W. Sabrosky (Washington, D. C), R. L. Usinger (Berkeley), J. van der Vecht (Leiden), K. Yasumatsu (Fukuoka), E. C. Zimmerman (New Hampshire). Assistant Editors: P. D. Ashlock (Honolulu), Carol Higa (Honolulu), Naoko Kunimori (Fukuoka), Setsuko Nakata (Honolulu), Toshi Takata (Fukuoka). Business Manager: C. M. Yoshimoto (Honolulu). Business Assistant: Doris Anbe (Honolulu). Business Agent in Japan: K. Yasumatsu (Fukuoka). Entomological staff, Bishop Museum, 1966: Doris Anbe, Hatsuko Arakaki, P. D. Ashlock, S. Azuma, Madaline Boyes, Candida Cardenas, Ann Cutting, M. L. Goff, J. L. Gressitt (Chairman), J. Harrell, Carol Higa, Y. Hirashima, Shirley Hokama, E. Holzapfel, Dorothy Hoxie, Helen Hurd, June Ibara, Naoko Kuni­ mori, T. C. Maa, Grace Nakahashi, Setsuko Nakata (Adm. Asst.), Tulene Nonomura, Carol Okuma, Ka­ tharine Pigue, Linda Reineccius, T. Saigusa, I. Sakakibara, Judy Sakamoto, G. A. Samuelson, Sybil Seto, W. A. Steffan, Amy Suehiro, Grace Thompson, Clara Uchida, J. R. Vockeroth, Nixon Wilson, Mabel Ya- tsuoka, C. M. Yoshimoto, E. C. Zimmermann. Field associates: M. J. Fitzsimons, E. E. Gless, G. E. Lip- pert, V. Peckham, D. S. Rabor, J. Sedlacek, M. Sedlacek, P. Shanahan, R. Straatman, J. Strong, H. M. Tor- revillas, A.
    [Show full text]