Freeing Semiclassical Field Theory from the UV Catastrophe and Cutoff Dependence
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Freeing semiclassical field theory from the UV catastrophe and cutoff dependence Piotr Deuar Joanna Pietraszewicz Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland Inspiration from: discussions at FINESS meetings Nick Proukakis collaborations Mariusz Gajda with Mirek Brewczyk Kazimierz Rzążewski Outline ● Classical wave fields for bosons (background) ● UV and cutoff issues ● Trying to fix it using truncated Wigner ● Fixing it ● Simple examples ● Serious example: breathing mode at high temperature in 3d 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 2/24 Simplest semiclassical method = “classical” wave fields Replacement: Reasoning: 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 3/24 Simplest evolution equations ● Dynamics: * Gross-Pitaevskii equation (GPE) ● Thermal ensemble: * run equations until stationary More fancy method: Truncated Wigner representation includes quantum fluctuations (for short times) 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 4/24 The point of semiclassical field theory ● Nonperturbative ● T > 0 ● Single shots ● No special conditions, symmetries, geometries ● Scales very well with system size 1d gas – phase domains after cooling Liu, Donadello, Lamporesi, Ferrari, Gou, Dalfovo, Proukakis, arXiv:1712.08074 1d gas – thermal equilibrium 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 5/24 Classical wave field models ZNG PGPE + Hartree-Fock SGPE nonperturbative low E modes many-modes at low E high energy description dynamic static reservoir dynamic Low E – high E coupling temperature zero & set extracted set cutoff dependence no some more numerical effort large medium medium 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 6/24 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, 16.03.2018Technology, Swinburne of University Cutoff dependence of observables Cutoff relative error (comparison to Bethe ansatz) to Bethe (comparison e.g. 1d bose gas quasicondensate momentum cutoff momentum detailed study detailed VIC Australia VIC Pietraszewicz, arXiv:1707.01776PD, 92, 063620 (2015) Pietraszewicz, PRA PD, relative error momentum cutoff momentum quantum turbulent quantum 7 /24 Ultraviolet catastrophe Quantum Bose-Einstein distribution ½k T energy per PARTICLE B Classical field Rayleigh-Jeans distribution k T energy per MODE B particles kinetic energy (idgas) ) ) k k ( ( N E momentum k / √(k T) momentum k / √(k T) B B Also applies to truncated Wigner at long times 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 8/24 1st fix approach: Optimized cutoff Pietraszewicz, PD, arXiv:1707.01776 ● Uniform 1d Bose gas: comparison to exact results Relative error Global error bound Global accuracy of observables min RMS Optimal cutoff opt f c 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 9/24 SGPE equation A variety that is amenable to useful amendments Hamiltonian evolution energy dependent loss to reservoir complex noise Local frequency extraction 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 10/24 2nd fix approach: stable truncated Wigner ● Collaboration: Joan Pietraszewicz, PD (IF PAN) Nick Proukakis (Newcastle) King Ng, Peter Drummond (Swinburne) ● Re-derived SGPE, taking care to preserve Wigner distribution ● Obtain amended stochastic equation: Explicit particle correction to energy Wigner correction to expectation values ● Preserves virtual vacuum noise and quantum fluctuations, even as t→ ∞ 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 11/24 Add quantum treatment of c-field modes? ● Full truncated Wigner representation of the SGPE model ● Wave-particle duality included PD, Pietraszewicz, Proukakis, Świsłocki, in preparation (2018) Antibunching present But cutoff dependence same as before! → true quantum fluctuations ) ) x , x , 0 ( 0 ) ( 2 ) ( 2 ( g g distance cutoff The remaining culprit: classical BATH 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 12/24 Three interpretations of the reservoir ● Direct Models the effect of atoms above the energy cutoff but – their number tends to be small ● Added noise Models the effect of extra modes missing from the model e.g. transverse modes in a low-dim system but – their number tends to be small ● Constraint (state engineering) Its role is to force the high energy modes into known and wanted states 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 13/24 Classical bath SGPE master equation frequency extractor Consider: 1 mode coupled to a bath lattice analogy Substitute classical occupations Obtain SGPE master equation 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 14/24 Use a quantum bath Substitute quantum occupations Obtain amended SGPE “Only” real difference Bears similarity to the “generalised” SGPE obtained by Duine+Stoof PRA 65, 013603 (2001) 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 15/24 Ideal 1d trapped gas (cutoff dependence) exact plain SGPE modified SGPE cutoff from arXiv:1707.01776 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 16/24 Interacting 1d trapped gas plain SGPE modified SGPE cutoff from arXiv:1707.01776 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 17/24 Interacting 3d trapped gas density in momentum space higher temperature Kinetic energy density plain SGPE – to scale 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 18/24 Litmus test for thermal cloud: Jin et al , PRL 78, 764 (1997) m=0 collective mode The above figures from: Jackson, Zaremba, PRL 88, 180402 (2002) Bezett, Blakie, PRA 79, 023602 (2009) adapted from: Jin 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, et al , PRL 78, 764 (1997) fit decaying sinusoid VIC Australia condensate thermal cloud 19 /24 Results of m=0 mode tests in the past ZNG PGPE + HF Jackson, Zaremba, PRL 88, 180402 (2002) Bezett, Blakie, PRA 79, 023602 (2009) PGPE (higher cutoff) Karpiuk, Brewczyk, Gajda, Rzążewski, PRA 81, 013629 (2010) 2nd order Bogoliubov Morgan, Rusch, Hutchinson, Burnett PRL 91, 250403 (2003) 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 20/24 m=0 mode frequency condensate thermal condensate thermal Experiment: Jin, Matthews, Ensher, Wieman, Cornell, PRL 78, 764 (1997) This work (2018) ZNG: Jackson, Zaremba, PRL 88, 180402 (2002) 2nd order Bogoliubov: Morgan, Rusch, Hutchinson, Burnett PRL 91, 250403 (2003) PGPE+HF: Bezettt, Blakie, PRA 79, 023602 (2009) PGPE: Karpiuk, Brewczyk, Gajda, Rzążewski, PRA 81, 013629 (2010) 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 21/24 m=0 mode damping condensate condensate thermal thermal Experiment: Jin, Matthews, Ensher, Wieman, Cornell, PRL 78, 764 (1997) This work (2018) ZNG: Jackson, Zaremba, PRL 88, 180402 (2002) 2nd order Bogoliubov: Morgan, Rusch, Hutchinson, Burnett PRL 91, 250403 (2003) PGPE+HF: Bezettt, Blakie, PRA 79, 023602 (2009) PGPE: Karpiuk, Brewczyk, Gajda, Rzążewski, PRA 81, 013629 (2010) 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 22/24 Cutoff dependence Experiment Jin et al 1997 open: thermal Bezett + Blakie 2009 Karpiuk, Brewczyk, Gajda, Rzążewski 2010 This work filled: condensate Experiment filled: condensate open: thermal 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 23/24 Concluding remarks • Entire system can be treated this way within a c-field framework coherent + thermal • Cutoff dependence slain when lattice sufficiently large • Numerical effort comparable to SGPE though, lattice may need to be larger • Still lacks wave-particle duality but this is harder to spot than expected arXiv:1804.XXXXX 16.03.2018 Swinburne University of Technology, VIC Australia 24/24.