DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 127/Friday, June 30

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 127/Friday, June 30 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 127 / Friday, June 30, 2000 / Notices 40721 Issued in Washington, DC on June 26, original equipment and replacement the 41 vehicle lines with a theft rate 2000. parts of high-theft lines of passenger higher than 3.5826, 35 are passenger car Eric Gabler, motor vehicles. lines, 6 are multipurpose passenger Manager, Passenger Facility Charge Branch. The agency is required by 49 U.S.C. vehicle lines, and none are light-duty [FR Doc. 00±16664 Filed 6±29±00; 8:45 am] 33104(b)(4) to periodically obtain, from truck lines. BILLING CODE 4910±13±M the most reliable source, accurate and On Tuesday, February 8, 2000, timely theft data and publish the data NHTSA published the preliminary theft for review and comment. To fulfill this rates for CY 1998 passenger motor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION statutory mandate, NHTSA has vehicles in the Federal Register (65 FR published theft data annually beginning 6250). The agency tentatively ranked National Highway Traffic Safety with MYs 1983/84. Continuing to fulfill each of the MY 1998 vehicle lines in Administration the § 33104(b)(4) mandate, this descending order of theft rate. The document reports the final theft data for [Docket No. NHTSA±99±6586; Notice 02] public was requested to comment on the CY 1998, the most recent calendar year accuracy of the data and to provide final RIN 2127±AH76 for which data are available. production figures for individual In calculating the 1998 theft rates, vehicle lines. The agency received Final Theft Data; Motor Vehicle Theft NHTSA followed the same procedures it written comments from General Motors Prevention Standard used in calculating the MY 1997 theft Corporation (GM) and Volkswagen of rates. (For 1997 theft data calculations, AGENCY: National Highway Traffic America, Inc. (VW). The agency used all see 64 FR 41183, July 29, 1999.) As in Safety Administration (NHTSA), written comments to make the necessary all previous reports, NHTSA's data were Department of Transportation. adjustments to its data. As a result of the based on information provided to adjustments, some of the final theft rates ACTION: Publication of final theft data. NHTSA by the National Crime and rankings of vehicle lines changed Information Center (NCIC) of the SUMMARY: This document publishes the from those published in the February Federal Bureau of Investigation. The final data on thefts of model year (MY) 2000 notice. In its comments, NCIC is a government system that 1998 passenger motor vehicles that Volkswagen informed the agency that receives vehicle theft information from occurred in calendar year (CY) 1998. the production volume for the Audi A4 nearly 23,000 criminal justice agencies The final 1998 theft data indicate a vehicle line was incorrect. In response and other law enforcement authorities decrease in the vehicle theft rate when to this comment, the production volume throughout the United States. The NCIC compared to the theft rate experienced for the Audi A4 has been corrected and data also include reported thefts of self- in CY/MY 1997. The final theft rate for the final theft list has been revised insured and uninsured vehicles, not all MY 1998 passenger vehicles stolen in accordingly. As a result of the of which are reported to other data calendar year 1998 (2.53 thefts per correction, the Audi A4 previously sources. thousand vehicles produced) decreased ranked No. 163 with a theft rate of The 1998 theft rate for each vehicle by 17.05 percent from the theft rate for 0.8669 is now ranked No. 168 with a line was calculated by dividing the CY/MY 1997 vehicles (3.05 thefts per theft rate of 0.7147. number of reported thefts of MY 1998 thousand vehicles produced). vehicles of that line stolen during GM informed the agency that the Publication of these data fulfills calendar year 1998 by the total number production volumes for the Chevrolet NHTSA's statutory obligation to of vehicles in that line manufactured for Metro and Chevrolet Tracker were periodically obtain accurate and timely MY 1998, as reported to the incorrect. Upon further review of the theft data and publish the information Environmental Protection Agency production volumes, it was later for review and comment. (EPA). confirmed by GM that the volumes FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. The final 1998 theft data show a listed by the agency for the two lines Rosalind Proctor, Office of Planning and decrease in the vehicle theft rate when were not in error. Therefore, the Consumer Programs, NHTSA, 400 compared to the theft rate experienced production volume and the theft rate for Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC in CY/MY 1997. The final theft rate for the Chevrolet Metro and Chevrolet 20590. Ms. Proctor's telephone number MY 1998 passenger vehicles stolen in Tracker vehicle lines will remain is (202) 366±0846. Her fax number is CY 1998 decreased to 2.53 thefts per unchanged. (202) 493±2290. thousand vehicles produced, a decrease The following list represents SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA of 17.05 percent from the rate of 3.05 NHTSA's final calculation of theft rates administers a program for reducing thefts per thousand vehicles for all 1998 passenger motor vehicle motor vehicle theft. The central feature experienced by MY 1997 vehicles in CY lines. This list is intended to inform the of this program is the Federal Motor 1997. For MY 1998 vehicles, out of a public of calendar year 1998 motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, 49 total of 196 vehicle lines, 41 lines had vehicle thefts of model year 1998 CFR Part 541. The standard specifies a theft rate higher than 3.5826 per vehicles and does not have any effect on performance requirements for inscribing thousand vehicles, the established the obligations of regulated parties and affixing vehicle identification median theft rate for MYs 1990/1991. under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 331, Theft numbers (VINs) onto certain major (See 59 FR 12400, March 16, 1994.) Of Prevention. THEFT RATES OF MODEL YEAR 1998 PASSENGER MOTOR VEHICLES STOLEN IN CALENDAR YEAR 1998 1998 theft rate (per Manufacturer Make/model (line) Thefts 1998 Production 1,000 vehi- (mfr's) 1998 cles pro- duced) 1 MITSUBISHI ................................................... DIAMANTE ........................................................... 87 6,584 13.2139 2 LAMBORGHINI .............................................. DB132/DIABLO .................................................... 1 104 9.6154 VerDate 11<MAY>2000 18:23 Jun 29, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM pfrm08 PsN: 30JNN1 40722 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 127 / Friday, June 30, 2000 / Notices THEFT RATES OF MODEL YEAR 1998 PASSENGER MOTOR VEHICLES STOLEN IN CALENDAR YEAR 1998ÐContinued 1998 theft rate (per Manufacturer Make/model (line) Thefts 1998 Production 1,000 vehi- (mfr's) 1998 cles pro- duced) 3 SAAB .............................................................. 9000 ...................................................................... 12 1,335 8.9888 4 HONDA .......................................................... ACURA INTEGRA ................................................ 314 36,253 8.6614 5 MITSUBISHI ................................................... MIRAGE ............................................................... 357 41,904 8.5195 6 TOYOTA ........................................................ TERCEL ............................................................... 92 11,207 8.2092 7 CHRYSLER CORP ........................................ DODGE STRATUS .............................................. 750 107,276 6.9913 8 MITSUBISHI ................................................... MONTERO SPORT/NATIVA 1 .............................. 318 45,772 6.9475 9 GENERAL MOTORS ..................................... OLDSMOBILE ACHIEVA ..................................... 181 26,922 6.7231 10 GENERAL MOTORS ..................................... GMC SAFARI VAN .............................................. 161 24,451 6.5846 11 GENERAL MOTORS ..................................... BUICK SKYLARK ................................................. 122 18,851 6.4718 12 HYUNDAI ....................................................... SONATA ............................................................... 101 16,406 6.1563 13 SUZUKI .......................................................... X±90 ..................................................................... 3 500 6.0000 14 CHRYSLER CORP ........................................ PLYMOUTH BREEZE .......................................... 393 66,612 5.8998 15 MITSUBISHI .................................................. GALANT ............................................................... 172 29,618 5.8073 16 CHRYSLER CORP ........................................ PLYMOUTH NEON .............................................. 499 87,055 5.7320 17 CHRYSLER CORP ........................................ DODGE NEON ..................................................... 725 130,154 5.5703 18 MITSUBISHI .................................................. ECLIPSE .............................................................. 307 56,294 5.4535 19 NISSAN ......................................................... MAXIMA ............................................................... 682 130,862 5.2116 20 CHRYSLER CORP ........................................ SEBRING CONVERTIBLE ................................... 251 50,812 4.9398 21 FORD MOTOR CO ....................................... MERCURY TRACER ..........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Report from Passenger Transport Magazine
    MAKinG TRAVEL SiMpLe apps Wide variations in journey planners quality of apps four stars Moovit For the first time, we have researched which apps are currently Combined rating: 4.5 (785k ratings) Operator: Moovit available to public transport users and how highly they are rated Developer: Moovit App Global LtD Why can’t using public which have been consistent table-toppers in CityMApper transport be as easy as Transport Focus’s National Rail Passenger Combined rating: 4.5 (78.6k ratings) ordering pizza? Speaking Survey, have not transferred their passion for Operator: Citymapper at an event in Glasgow customer service to their respective apps. Developer: Citymapper Limited earlier this year (PT208), First UK Bus was also among the 18 four-star robert jack Louise Coward, the acting rated bus operator apps, ahead of rivals Arriva trAinLine Managing Editor head of insight at passenger (which has different apps for information and Combined rating: 4.5 (69.4k ratings) watchdog Transport Focus, revealed research m-tickets) and Stagecoach. The 11 highest Operator: trainline which showed that young people want an rated bus operator apps were all developed Developer: trainline experience that is as easy to navigate as the one by Bournemouth-based Passenger, with provided by other retailers. Blackpool Transport, Warrington’s Own Buses, three stars She explained: “Young people challenged Borders Buses and Nottingham City Transport us with things like, ‘if I want to order a pizza all possessing apps with a 4.8-star rating - a trAveLine SW or I want to go and see a film, all I need to result that exceeds the 4.7-star rating achieved Combined rating: 3.4 (218 ratings) do is get my phone out go into an app’ ..
    [Show full text]
  • Parker Review
    Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Agms: Key Trends and Issues from a Review of 215 FTSE 350 Companies June 2013
    2013 AGMs: Key trends and issues from a review of 215 FTSE 350 companies June 2013 Statistics Commentary RESOLUTIONS Annual re-election of all directors 99% (213 companies) proposed annual re- 3% (7 companies) amended their articles to election of all directors reflect annual re-election Authority to allot shares: extra one 67% (144 companies) proposed a resolution This is similar to the results for 2012 third authority for the extra one third authority; 27% (57 companies) included a statement that where Under the UK Corporate Governance Code this extra one-third authority was used, the (Code) FTSE 350 directors should be subject directors would stand for re-election to annual election, so no longer necessary Any resolution to convene general 84% (181 companies) passed a resolution to NAPF recommends that companies should only meeting on 14 days’ notice convene a general meeting on 14 clear days’ call a general meeting on 14 clear days’ notice notice; 73% (158 companies) stated the in limited circumstances and these should be circumstances where meetings will be held on explained when tabling the resolution 14 clear days’ notice Details of any unusual resolution Resolutions proposed to approve an increase A few companies have increased this to in maximum aggregate fees payable to around £700,000 to allow them to appoint directors non-executive directors to the board Details of substantial vote (10-49%) 15% (33 companies) detailed substantial votes So far this year no FTSE 350 company has had against the directors’ remuneration against
    [Show full text]
  • London to Norwich Direct Train
    London To Norwich Direct Train Kristos gurgles her incautiousness frontally, dree and patchier. Nightmarish Adnan usually calibrate some lurkers or sleet jawbreakingly. Weighted Stillman bade ministerially or bales harmonically when Wyatan is rhotic. East anglia is direct, there are implemented and can travel entry to change or parks on this car, no direct train to london norwich. How to Travel From London to Norwich by Train Bus TripSavvy. National Express runs a regular bus service between London Victoria Coach now and the Norwich Bus Station which leaves London at. Bus from London to Norwich Find schedules Compare prices Book Megabus National Express and National Express tickets. The cheapest train connections from London to Norwich. When creating an average northern advanced fare. Norwich is also elm hill and table service is definitely worth trying when it from your train to yorkshire and make significant damage to alcohol, london to norwich direct train! Click on a gift card pin. What is Norwich like about visit? Get cheap train tickets to Norwich with our split up search. The direct from london st pancras international partners sites selected are as nationalrail and direct train tickets between london liverpool street every kind of. Our London Sidcup Hotel is Located between London and Kent and just 100m from the Train them Free Wi-Fi Throughout Your content Book Direct. How it is regarded as a colourful excursion to norwich here when we cannot wait to ironically for all! Connect to new azuma trains from time limit fuel facility supplies renewable compressed natural habitats, so just under a button down.
    [Show full text]
  • First Student
    Business review First Student Year to 31 March 2020 2019 costs. We attribute this continuing retention success to our excellent safety track record Revenue $2,474.9m $2,424.9m and consistent focus on building sustained customer relationships over many years, Adjusted operating profit $205.9m $227.1m resulting in this year’s record-breaking willingness to recommend and satisfaction Adjusted scores, which saw fully 75% of our customers operating margin 8.3% 9.4% rating us nine or ten on a ten-point scale for overall satisfaction. Average number of employees 48,000 48,000 Our retention success was supplemented with organic growth, continuing conversions from Paul Osland First Student revenue was $2,474.9m or in-house to private provision and good net President, First Student £1,940.4m (2019: $2,424.9m or £1,845.9m), market share gains from our larger competitors, representing growth in constant currency in several cases at higher pricing than ■■ Sustainable and resilient of 2.2%. This comprised growth of 4.1% in proposed by the incumbent. returns from our market constant currency to the end of February We also continued to build out our ability 2020, benefiting from the pricing and contract leading multi-year contract to supplement growth and expand our wins we achieved in the summer 2019 bid portfolio in the home-to- addressable market via acquisitions in this season as well as from acquisitions made school market fragmented segment of the mobility services in the year. This was partially offset in March industry. Since the start of the financial year we ■■ Opportunities for organic when substantially all North American schools have closed three transactions adding a total had closed by the end of the month due to the and M&A-led growth, of 850 buses.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering in the Midlands, UK 02 Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering in the Midlands, UK
    Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering in the Midlands, UK 02 Advanced manufacturing and engineering in the Midlands, UK Why the Midlands? The Midlands is one of the most dynamic areas in the UK. Located at the heart of a connected transport network, it has close proximity to London, and access to 75% of the UK within two hours. Home to over 10 million people and The home of Shakespeare, Robin Hood, 440,000 businesses, the region includes JRR Tolkien and Sir Isaac Newton is today the cities of Birmingham and Nottingham at the centre of plans for a new high-speed alongside Coventry, Derby, Hereford, rail network and an innovation hub for Leicester, Lincoln, Stoke-on- Trent, advanced manufacturing, automotive, Wolverhampton and Worcester. life sciences, digital technologies and rail technologies. Our local economy is worth more than £207bn, generating nearly 15% of the UK’s The region’s 20 universities support a Gross Value Added (GVA), and experiencing world-class science and innovation base growth of 18% over the last five years. making the region a global centre of We’re home to 27,500 businesses in excellence in areas such as advanced advanced manufacturing, employing manufacturing, engineering, low carbon 246,100. We export £43bn worth of goods and autonomous technologies, healthcare, to 178 countries, growing at a rate in excess life sciences and agri-food and drink. of the national rate. The Midlands is indeed The Midlands is home to some of the world’s an engine of growth at the heart of the UK. most globally recognised brands including Geographically, we are the cross roads Aston Martin, Bombardier, Cadbury, for much of Britain’s road, rail and airport Caterpillar, Cosworth, Dr Martens, EON, connectivity with access to 92% of UK Jaguar Land Rover, JCB, National Express population in under four hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Commentary
    Quarterly Economic Commentary and Northern Bluebird. Of the two, Scottish Citylink provides almost twice as many services in terms of vehicle mileage. Cross-border services to English Economic towns and cities are operated solely by National Express. Neither of the operators are competing against each other on the same routes, indeed Stagecoach Western Scottish occasionally provide PERSPECTIVE coaches for duplicate services to Scottish Citylink. The method of operation for services in the industry is of interest. Scottish Citylink do not own, garage or maintain any of the coaches used on their routes. Instead they contract independent coach operators to SCOTTISH EXPRESS COACH SERVICES - run the services on their (Citylink's) behalf. In 1993 LOSS LEADERS AND ANTI-COMPETITIVE at the time of their merger with National Express PRACTICE Citylink had contracts with 14 operators. All of these were retained but recent additions to the by Colin Sinclair, Dept. of Economics, Glasgow network may have increased this number. These Caledonian University contracts are for specific and detailed schedules of services and are for a fixed price no matter how many passengers are carried. Most contracts are also INTRODUCTION short-term lasting for six months at a time, but occasionally longer contracts are awarded to cover Over the last 16 years, the Scottish express coach the provision of new vehicles. The contracts industry has undergone dramatic changes. generally ensure that vehicles operate in Citylink Legislation almost completely reversed the effects of livery and that the operator is responsible for all the 1930 Road Traffic Act and removed quantitative running costs, including drivers, insurance, fuel and controls in the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Act Annual Conference
    EVENT OVERVIEW ACT ANNUAL CONFERENCE 21-22 May 2019 Manchester Central, UK ATTENDEE PROFILE TOTAL 9/10 DELEGATES ATTENDEES WOULD RECOMMEND 1075 THE EVENT TO A FRIEND/COLLEAGUE FROM OR ATTEND AGAIN 388COMPANIES 88 DELEGATES SPONSORS AND REPRESENTING 323 EXHIBITORS COMPANIES 97SPEAKERS 548 INCLUDING: • Anglo American • London Stock Exchange • Arup • Mitsubishi • ASOS • National Express • AstraZeneca • National Oilwell Varco SENIORITY OF • BAE Systems • Pearson • Balfour Beatty • Petrofac Services CORPORATE AUDIENCE • BASF • Primark • BT • PZ Cussons • Burberry • RELX • Centrica • Renewi • Compass Group • Rentokil • Deliveroo • Royal Dutch Shell • Drax • Sainsbury’s • Dyson • Schneider Electric • easyJet • Scottish Power • Electrocomponents • Serco • Equiniti • Sky • Etihad Airways • Stagecoach • Farfetch • Statoil • Google UK • Tate & Lyle • GSK • Tesco • Halfords • Thames Water • Hammerson • Thomas Cook • Heathrow Airport • Travelport • Hitachi Capital • UK Power Networks • InterContinental Hotels • Urenco • ITV • Virgin Media • JD Sports Fashion • Vodafone • John Lewis • WorldPay BOARD LEVEL/STRATEGIC LEADER 52% • Just Eat • Yildirim Holdings MANAGERIAL 30% OF COMPANIES CORPORATE SENIOR OPERATIONAL 17% THAT ATTENDED DELEGATES WITH JOB AS DELEGATES TITLES INCLUDING: TACTICAL 1% WERE GROUP TREASURER, HEAD 50% CORPORATE. 107 OF TREASURY, HEAD OF CORPORATE FINANCE EVENT OVERVIEW CONTENT AND FEEDBACK TOTAL NETWORKING TOTAL CONTENT AVAILABLE 10.3 29.4 HOURS HOURS LIBOR DIGITAL TREASURY TOP TOPICS SUSTAINABLE FINANCE PAYMENT INNOVATION AND RISKS OPEN BANKING GLOBAL AND DOMESTIC FINANCING MACROECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT EVENT APP SOCIAL MEDIA UNIQUE USERS: 435 726 TWEETS TOTAL APP GENERATED USING PAGE VIEWS: 74,666 #ACTAC19 DELEGATE FEEDBACK “THE ACT ANNUAL CONFERENCE PROVIDES AN EXCELLENT “IF YOU ONLY ATTEND ONE EVENT IN A YEAR, MAKE IT THE OPPORTUNITY TO NETWORK WITH OTHER TREASURY ACT ANNUAL CONFERENCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Trainline Prospectus – June 2019
    ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION DISCLAIMER STRICTLY NOT TO BE FORWARDED TO ANY OTHER PERSONS IMPORTANT: You must read the following disclaimer before continuing. This electronic transmission applies to the attached document and you are therefore advised to read this disclaimer carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the attached prospectus (the “Prospectus”) relating to Trainline plc (the “Company”) dated 21 June 2019 accessed from this page or otherwise received as a result of such access and you are therefore advised to read this disclaimer carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the attached Prospectus. In accessing the attached Prospectus, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them from time to time, each time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. You acknowledge that this electronic transmission and the delivery of the attached Prospectus is confidential and intended for you only and you agree you will not forward, reproduce or publish this electronic transmission or the attached Prospectus to any other person. The Prospectus has been prepared solely in connection with the proposed offer to certain institutional and professional investors (the “Offer”) of ordinary shares (the “Shares”) of the Company. The Prospectus has been published in connection with the admission of the Shares to the premium listing segment of the Official List of the UK Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) and to trading on London Stock Exchange plc’s main market for listed securities (together, “Admission”). The Prospectus has been approved by the FCA as a prospectus prepared in accordance with the Prospectus Rules made under section 73A of the FSMA.
    [Show full text]
  • FTSE Russell Publications
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE 250 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Infrastructure 0.43 UNITED Bytes Technology Group 0.23 UNITED Edinburgh Investment Trust 0.25 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM 4imprint Group 0.18 UNITED C&C Group 0.23 UNITED Edinburgh Worldwide Inv Tst 0.35 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM 888 Holdings 0.25 UNITED Cairn Energy 0.17 UNITED Electrocomponents 1.18 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aberforth Smaller Companies Tst 0.33 UNITED Caledonia Investments 0.25 UNITED Elementis 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aggreko 0.51 UNITED Capita 0.15 UNITED Energean 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Airtel Africa 0.19 UNITED Capital & Counties Properties 0.29 UNITED Essentra 0.23 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AJ Bell 0.31 UNITED Carnival 0.54 UNITED Euromoney Institutional Investor 0.26 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Alliance Trust 0.77 UNITED Centamin 0.27 UNITED European Opportunities Trust 0.19 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Allianz Technology Trust 0.31 UNITED Centrica 0.74 UNITED F&C Investment Trust 1.1 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AO World 0.18 UNITED Chemring Group 0.2 UNITED FDM Group Holdings 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Apax Global Alpha 0.17 UNITED Chrysalis Investments 0.33 UNITED Ferrexpo 0.3 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Ascential 0.4 UNITED Cineworld Group 0.19 UNITED Fidelity China Special Situations 0.35 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Ashmore
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Investment Programme PDF 8 MB
    Transport Delivery Committee Date 8th January 2018 Report title Investment Programme Accountable Director Laura Shoaf, Managing Director Transport for West Midlands Accountable Phil Hewitt, Metro Programme Director Employee Email: [email protected] Tel: 0121 214 7254 Councillor Roger Horton – Lead Member Rail and Metro Report to be/has been considered by Recommendation(s) for action or decision: The Transport Delivery Committee is recommended to note the report: 1.0 Purpose 1.1 To report on matters relating to the Metro Investment Programme in the West Midlands. Metro Investment Programme Overview – December 2017 Since the last update in September progress has continued to be been made in most areas of the Metro Programme in line with expectations. This note provides a brief overview of the main activities of the Metro team and the actions being taken to manage the principal risk / issues and opportunities that have arisen. 2.0 Birmingham City Centre Extension. 2.1 The access between St Chad’s tramstop and Queensway has now opened to the public. A review of the tramstop environment has highlighted the need for improved passenger information (wayfinding signage, local area and service information, real time display etc) and the Metro operations marketing team have produced a series of recommendations for enhancing the platform and ground level environments. These will be reviewed against available residual BCCE budgets. 2.1 National Express have installed additional pedestrian deterrent measures at the north end of the St Chads platform. A review is being carried out into accessibility of the bridge parapets from public areas and proposed measures to reduce this risk are being developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Reporting in 2019/20: from Intent to Action Observations from EY’S Review of FTSE 350 Narrative Reporting (7Th Edition)
    Annual reporting in 2019/20: from intent to action Observations from EY’s review of FTSE 350 narrative reporting (7th edition) 1 October 2020 Welcome and introduction 1. Share insights on how premium listed companies reported on the following in their 2019/20 annual report and accounts (ARAs): ► First year of implementing the 2018 Code and related regulation (Miscellaneous Reporting Regulations or MRR) ► Reporting under COVID-19 ► Moving from intent to action. 2. Ideas for enhancing your 2020/21 reporting 3. Questions and discussion Mala Shah-Coulon Maria Kepa Natalie Bell Associate Partner, Head of Director Senior Manager Corporate Governance Page 2 Annual reporting in 2019/20: from intent to action Annual reporting in 2019/20: from intent to action ► Observations covering: 1. Meaningful reporting 2. Purpose 3. Culture 4. Managing risk and viability 5. Climate change and the UN Sustainable Development Goals 6. Stakeholder engagement and Section 172 (s172) 7. Workforce engagement and diversity Based on a review of over 100 FTSE 350 ► Features include: ARAs with December 2019 to March ► Acid test updated for COVID-19 considerations 2020 year ends. ► Overview of new requirements ► Insights on underlying governance processes and leading practice examples ► Viewpoints from investors ► Recommendations on how to move ‘from intent to action’ Page 3 Annual reporting in 2019/20: from intent to action Setting the scene ► The ARA is a key mechanism by which investors and significant stakeholders hold directors to account Trust in business relies
    [Show full text]