2018 Annual Public Health Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2018 Annual Public Health Report Creating the Right Environments for Health The Annual Report from the Director of Public Health Reading July 2018 FOREWORD TABLE OF CONTENTS We are shaped by our environment more than we a defining generator of the town’s layout; and in About this Report ........................................................4 Research ................................................................22 may realise. Public health through the ages has Reading, the Thames side open spaces at Richfield In our area .............................................................22 always understood that environmental factors, from Avenue and at King’s Meadow provide homes to two Introduction – poor housing, lack of sanitation and poor air quality huge community events; the Reading Festival and the wider determinants of health ...........................6 Case Study: Reading Walks ..............................24 have an important role to play in determining our Reading Pride respectively. Communities and health inequalities ...........25 The Natural Environment ..........................................8 health; both as immediate threats to life and limb; and Policy ......................................................................25 as long-term factors creating long-term exposure to Berkshire’s natural environment can be seen to Policy ........................................................................8 Research ................................................................26 potential harms. Other disciplines - and indeed many provide opportunity for peace and tranquillity; gentle Research ..................................................................9 of our established arts - have sought refuge and and boisterous play; sport, competition and In our area .............................................................27 How can we measure Green space? ..............10 inspiration in nature; however, it has taken some time spectacle; natural habitats and preservation of Case study: Southcote Growallot ...................28 for public health and medicine to identify the evidence wildlife; and attractive places to walk; cycle and live Resources .............................................................11 base supporting what many of us had long felt; that amongst. That our communities are still able to live Opportunities and challenges ...............................30 Health Outcomes and Behaviours – nature and greenspace is good for us! amongst and use a variety of natural environments New developments and regeneration ............30 freely for our recreation is testament to many who Profiles ........................................................................12 Policy ......................................................................30 This report is intended for a wide audience. Since have fought for their preservation and enhancement. Mental Health ......................................................12 public health moved back into local government in Improvement in and widening access to green and In our area .............................................................13 Increasing access .....................................................32 2013, we have reconnected with many of our valued blue space must be a public health ambition in itself, Research ................................................................14 Research ................................................................32 colleagues in planning, leisure and sports and this report provides the evidence base to build development, parks and recreation, housing and that ambition. Case Study: Ridgeline Therapeutic Policy ......................................................................33 highways (amongst others) to create place-based Garden ...................................................................15 Case Study: Green Flag Campus at the strategies and deliver actions which bind together I truly hope that this report reconnects professions; Children and Young people ..............................16 University of Reading ........................................33 these wider determinants of health with our local communities and landowners who all have a duty to Research ................................................................17 priorities. I hope that this report reaches a wide and support the public’s health through creating the right Conclusions ................................................................34 diverse audience, most importantly to residents and environments for health to thrive and benefit us all In our area .............................................................17 Recommendations ...................................................34 to their representatives such as Councillors and GPs, through the beauty of natural and green spaces. Case Study: A Dose of Nature .........................18 who are poised to respond to the recommendations Physical activity ..................................................20 Bibliography ...............................................................35 laid out herein. Policy ......................................................................21 With ever increasing demands for new housing in the South-East of England, and the need to improve and increase infrastructure; so the natural environment can come under pressure and its intrinsic values may be overlooked. Berkshire is as a whole, a green and pleasant place. From the areas of outstanding natural beauty of the North Wessex Downs; to the Green Flag accredited parks of Slough, communities live close by Darrell Gale FFPH MSc BA (Hons) or surrounded by attractive green space. Rivers and Acting Strategic Director of Public Health for Berkshire waterways play an important part in our communities too – from the Thames at Windsor through to the reclaimed recreational parks and lakes of Dinton Pastures; these provide nature and people with nourishment, peace and pleasure. The new town planners who gave birth to Bracknell in the late 1940s planned a town where greenspace and recreation was 2 3 ABOUT THIS REPORT This report was developed and produced on behalf of Public Health Services the Acting Director of Public Health by Shared Public for Berkshire Health Services for Berkshire, and authored and coordinated by Dr Steffan Glaze (Foundation Doctor). Lynne Brett Sarah Shildrick This report is the joint effort of all Consultant-led Public Sam Claridge Health teams in Berkshire to produce the statutory Joy Smith annual report of the Director of Public Health both as a Trevor Keable pan-Berkshire document, celebrating the history of shared working across the six Unitary Authorities; and Becky Taylor also as a unique report for each individual authority. Emma Moule Nana Wadee Case studies were provided by a variety of individuals from local authority public health teams or other groups, such as voluntary organisations who are Reading Borough Council acknowledged below and with their contributions. Colleagues in Public Health and other departments of local government, as well as collaborators from other Finally, we acknowledge Judith Wright who was groups, contributed to the case studies found Interim Strategic Director of Public Health for Berkshire throughout this report or its design and administration. from April-December 2017, who conceived of the topic and encouraged us all to find the right environments Public Health Lead for Annual Report for health. Melissa Montague Contributors Berkshire Lead Consultants Graham Johnson in Public Health Nina Crispin Susanna Watt Shared Public Health Services for Berkshire Sharon Fitton Dr Jo Jefferies Luke Lloyd Bracknell Forest Dr Lisa McNally Natalie Ganpatsingh Reading The University of Reading Dr Marion Gibbon Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Teresa Salami-Oru Slough Dr Liz Brutus West Berkshire Matthew Pearce Wokingham Darrell Gale and Julie Hotchkiss 4 5 INTRODUCTION – This report will focus on one of the wider determinants Throughout the report, you will find case reports and The Wider Determinants of Health of health – the natural environment – and how this research. We want to make effective changes, such could be used to improve our health. We will begin by that investments made will reap benefits for our Health is a state of describing the natural environment and its relationship communities. The research is included to discuss the There are many factors, or determinants, that come complete physical, to other determinants of health, then go on to examine scientific factual evidence available, and local case together to affect our health. There are some we mental and social particular health dimensions in this context. Finally, we studies highlight the ways in which local communities cannot change – chiefly, our genes. Of the modifiable well-being and not will consider the challenges – and opportunities – to are already using the natural environment to stay factors, some are individual and personal choices such merely the absence the natural environment that we can adjust to improve healthy or improve their health. as taking up smoking or choosing to exercise. On a of disease or infirmity the wellbeing of our communities and from these build population level, there are the wider determinants of World Health recommendations to act on. health: a diverse range of economic, environmental Organisation, 1948 and social factors that affect people’s health and influence their choices and lifestyles. Difficult to quantify, many of these determinants are shaped by national and local
Recommended publications
  • Vegetation Management Site Specification – Wokingham to Reading
    Wessex Route CP6 Year 1 - Vegetation Management Site Specification – Wokingham to Reading 1. Site of Work Wokingham Station to Reading Station 2. Vegetation Management Overview The line of route between Wokingham and Reading is generally a heavily wooded urban area, which narrows in places and runs through a series of cuttings and embankments. Management of lineside vegetation between Wokingham and Reading has been overlooked in recent years and as a result, this route now tops Network Rail Wessex’s priority list for vegetation management. Lineside vegetation along this route is to be managed in order to prevent it causing obstruction and damage to either the rail network or to our lineside neighbours. In considering the work required, several criteria have been considered: • All lines of route must have a safe cess (walkway) for staff who are required to walk along the lineside to carry out their duties. A minimum 7 metre wide cut-back of vegetation has been specified in order to maintain a 6 metre wide vegetation-free corridor either side of the outermost rails. • Embankments supporting the railway tracks generally need vegetation to be retained at the bottom third of their slope in order to maintain stability at the toe of the embankment. In certain circumstances all vegetation is removed to allow for retaining structures to be installed. Where vegetation has the potential to cause an issue to Network Rail’s lineside neighbours it is to be removed. • There are several cutting slopes (where the railway is lower in elevation than the surrounding terrain) on the Wokingham to Reading route.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Econet Meeting Monday, 7Th March 2013 at 7:30Pm RBC Parks Department Offices, Prospect Park
    Page 1 of 4 Minutes of Econet Meeting Monday, 7th March 2013 at 7:30pm RBC Parks Department Offices, Prospect Park Present: Steve Ayers, Dave Booth, Kit Brownlee (Chair / minutes), John Lerpiniere, Tricia Marcouse Alan Stevens Apologises for Absence: Oonagh Kelleher, Judith Oliver, Anne Latto, Mike Cox, Christine Cliburn Minutes From Previous Meeting (12/9/12) Accepted Matters Arising None News & Updates Crow On average around 10 people per task are volunteering There is currently a full program of work with Ufton Court being added to the work sites. Ufton Court site is woodland with mature oaks & Hazel coppice Friends of Clayfield Copse No report Friends of Mapledurham Has 6 to 7 regular volunteers, enhanced on one occasion by the presence of Councillor Isobel Ballsdon. Work consists mainly of general tidying of the site. Community Service volunteers assisted in the laying of woodchip. It is hoped to do more planting to give clumps of 2 or 3 mature trees (Tm can assist/advise with supplies). There is an increased usage of the site by w3alkers & dog walkers. Friends of MciIroy Park Membership is down to 3 & we need to examine ways to increase this More exciting tasks? Detailed management plan? Crow to kick off the next series of work parties (thus heartening the volunteers) Increased publicity ? KHB to get further posters into Tilhurst Library & other Reading Libraries Friends of Waterloo Meadows Consists solely of 3 volunteers who seem happy as they are. No help has ever been requested RUWG Still keeping watch on planning applications. Very few coming through currently.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalist #71 (2019)
    The Reading Naturalist No. 71 Published by the Reading and District Natural History Society Report for 2018 (Published 2019) Price to Non-Members £5.00 T H E R E A D I N G N A T U R A L I S T No 71 for the year 2018 The Journal of the Reading and District Natural History Society President Mr David Cliffe Honorary General Secretary Mr Rob Stallard Honorary Editor Mr Ken White , Yonder Cottage, Ashford Hill, Reading, RG19 8AX Honorary Recorders Botany: Dr Ren ée Grayer , 16 Harcourt Drive, Earley, Reading, RG6 5TJ Fungi: Position Vacant Lichens: Position Vacant Lepidoptera: Mr Norman Hal l, 44 Harcourt Drive, Earley, Reading, RG6 5TJ Entomology & other Invertebrates: Position Vacant Vertebrates: Mr Tony Rayner , The Red Cow, 46 Wallingford Road, Cholsey, Wallingford, OX10 9LB CONTENTS page Presidential Musings David Cliffe 1 Membership Norman Hall, Ian Duddle 2 Members’ Observations Julia Cooper, Rob Stallard 2 Excursions 2018 Jan Haseler, Norman Hall, 6 Sean O’Leary, Jerry Welsh Tricia Marcous é, Sarah White, Ken White Mid-week Walks 2018 Jan Haseler, Julia Cooper 18 Sue White Away Trips 2018 Jan Haseler 23 Indoor Meetings 2018 Renée Grayer, Rob Stallard 26 Susan Twitchett, Tricia Marcous é Winning photographs and photographs from outings RDNHS Members 33-36 Christmas Party and Photographic Competition Laurie Haseler 39 Presidential Address David Cliffe 41 Autumn Raptors in Andalucia Fiona Brown 45 A Sunflower Tale Sarah White 47 Recorder’s Report for Botany 2018 Renée Grayer 47 Recorder’s Report for Lepidoptera 2018 Norman Hall 52 Recorder’s Report for Vertebrates 2018 Tony Rayner 64 The Weather in Reading during 2018 Roger Brugge 68 Slugs in the Kitchen Rob Stallard 72 RDNHS Winter Goose and Swan Review Ken White 72 My special thanks to all the contributors for their thousands of hours of effort in the field, collating data & meeting the deadlines for reports whilst carrying on with their busy lives.
    [Show full text]
  • PRE-SUBMISSION DRAFT READING BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN Regulation 19 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012
    PRE-SUBMISSION DRAFT READING BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN Regulation 19 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 November 2017 DRAFT READING BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN ● APRIL 2017 FOREWORD FOREWORD By Councillor Tony Page The Local Plan will be the document that guides development in Reading up to 2036, and it will therefore play a decisive role in how our town evolves over the next two decades. We are publishing this draft of the plan for consultation, and it is important to have your views on it, so that they can be taken into account in finalising the plan. Over recent years, Reading has had considerable economic success, and this has resulted in considerable investment to the town. However, this success brings its own issues. In particular, Reading faces a housing crisis. There are not enough homes in general, and there is a particularly acute need for affordable housing, which represents more than half of our overall housing need. This document is a major part of our response to this issue, although we continue to work with neighbouring Councils to look at the needs of the Reading area as a whole. Other critical issues to be considered include how to provide the employment space and supporting infrastructure to make sure that Reading’s attractiveness as a place to work, to live and to study can continue. The benefits of Reading’s economic success also need to be shared out more equally with those communities in Reading that suffer high levels of deprivation and exclusion. The plan also looks again at the message that Reading’s environment sends to visitors and residents, both in terms of revitalising tired and run-down sites and areas, and in placing greater focus on our considerable, but often overlooked, historic legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Living List 2019
    LOCAL WILDIFE SITES IN READING - 2019 This list includes Local Widlife Sites. Please contact TVERC for information on: • site location and boundary • area (ha) • designation date • last survey date • site description • notable and protected habitats and species recorded on site Site Code Site Name District Parish SU77I02 Clayfield Copse Reading Borough Council Peppard SU77B03 Cow Lane Depot Reading Borough Council Battle SU77D05 Furzplat Reading Borough Council Thames SU77D08 Highdown Wood Reading Borough Council Thames SU67S01 McIlroy Park Tilehurst Reading Borough Council SU67W03 Meadway Fringe Reading Borough Council Norcot SU77G04 Reading Cemetery Reading Borough Council Park SU67X02 The Warren Woodlands complex Reading Borough Council Thames SU77F01 Whitley Park Farm/St Patricks Reading Borough Council Redlands Hall Pond SU77G02 The Coal Kennetmouth and Kings Meadow Reading Borough East Council SU67S01 Round Copse Reading Borough Council Kentwood SU77D04 Hemdean Bottom Reading Borough Council Thames SU67W01 Prospect Park (includes The Reading Borough Council Southcote Rookery) SU77F02 The Cowsey Reading Borough Council Church SU77A03 Fobney and Kennet Valley Reading Borough Council and West Minster and Meadows Berkshire Burghfield CP SU77B01 Holy Brook Reading Borough Council Minster SU77A02 River Kennet/Kennet and Avon Reading Borough Council Southcote Canal SU77D07 Rotherfield Way Copse Reading Borough Council Peppard SU77A08 Fobney Island Reading Christ Church SU67R04 Blundells Copse + The Moor Reading Borough Council Tilehurst
    [Show full text]
  • Local Wildife Sites Reading - 2021
    LOCAL WILDIFE SITES READING - 2021 This list includes Local Wildlife Sites. Please contact TVERC for information on: • site location and boundary • area (ha) • designation date • last survey date • site description • notable and protected habitats and species recorded on site Site Code Site Name District Parish SU67R04 Blundells Copse + The Moor Reading Borough Council Tilehurst SU67S01 McIlroy Park, Tilehurst Reading Borough Council Kentwood SU67W01 Prospect Park (includes The Reading Borough Council Southcote Rookery) SU67W02 Lousehill Copse Reading Borough Council Norcot SU67W03 Meadway Fringe Reading Borough Council Norcot SU67X02 The Warren Woodlands Reading Borough Council Thames complex SU77A02 River Kennet/Kennet and Avon Reading Borough Council Southcote Canal SU77A03 Fobney and Kennet Valley Reading Borough Council and Minster and Meadows West Berkshire Burghfield CP SU77A08 Fobney Island Reading Christ Church, St. Mark, All Saints, St. SU77B01 Holy Brook Reading Borough Council Minster SU77B03 Cow Lane Depot Reading Borough Council Battle SU77D04 Hemdean Bottom Reading Borough Council Thames SU77D05 Furzplat Reading Borough Council Thames SU77D07 Rotherfield Way Copse Reading Borough Council Peppard SU77D08 Highdown Wood Reading Borough Council Thames SU77F01 Whitley Park Farm/St Patricks Reading Borough Council Redlands, Church Hall Pond SU77F02 The Cowsey Reading Borough Council Church SU77G02 The Coal, Kennetmouth and Reading Borough Council Abbey Kings Meadow East SU77I02 Clayfield Copse Reading Borough Council Peppard
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan Background Paper
    LOCAL PLAN BACKGROUND PAPER Information to support the Submission Draft Reading Borough Local Plan March 2018 Reading Borough Local Plan Local Plan Background Paper March 2018 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 7 2. KEY FACTS ABOUT READING 8 2.1 General 8 2.2 Living in Reading 8 2.3 Working in Reading 12 2.4 Environment in Reading 13 2.5 Development in Reading 15 2.6 Getting about in Reading 17 2.7 Key messages 17 3. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 19 3.1 Introduction 19 3.2 How the Local Plan has been developed 19 3.3 Compliance with the Local Development Scheme 24 3.4 Compliance with the Statement of Community Involvement 25 3.5 Sustainability Appraisal of the Local Plan 28 3.6 Soundness and legal compliance 31 3.7 Compliance with Regional Spatial Strategy 37 3.8 Internal consistency 38 3.9 Flexibility to deal with changing circumstances 44 3.10 Replacement of development plan policies 52 4. BACKGROUND TO SPECIFIC POLICIES 57 4.1 Presumption in favour of sustainable development (CC1) 57 4.2 Sustainable design and construction (CC2) 58 4.3 Adaptation to climate change (CC3) 59 4.4 Decentralised energy (CC4) 61 4.5 Waste minimisation and storage (CC5) 62 4.6 Accessibility and the intensity of development (CC6) 63 4.7 Design and the public realm (CC7) 64 4.8 Safeguarding amenity (CC8) 64 4.9 Securing infrastructure (CC9) 65 4.10 Protection and enhancement of the historic environment (EN1) 68 4.11 Areas of archaeological significance (EN2) 68 4.12 Enhancement of conservation areas (EN3) 68 4.13 Locally important heritage assets (EN4) 68 4.14 Protection
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Biodiversity Action Plan Draft for Consultation 27 February 2020
    Page 1 of 70 Reading Biodiversity Action Plan Draft for consultation 27 February 2020 1. Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Biodiversity ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 What is biodiversity? .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Why is biodiversity important? .................................................................................................................................................. 5 What is a Biodiversity Action Plan? ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Why does Reading need a Biodiversity Action Plan? ......................................................................................................................... 5 The 2006 Reading BAP ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 What is the vision for Reading’s biodiversity? ................................................................................................................................ 6 How is the BAP structured, what are
    [Show full text]
  • Core Strategy G NIN an Adopted PL
    G FOR TH Reading NIN E F N UT LA U P RE Borough Local T S R Development E A S P P E E Framework C H T T I N G G N I T T H C E E P P S A E S R T E P R L U A T N U N F I N E H G T F R O Core Strategy G NIN AN Adopted PL January 2008 P L A N N I N G G NIN AN PL P L A N N I N G FOREWORD TO THE ADOPTED CORE STRATEGY DOCUMENT BY COUNCILLOR TOM CRISP This document sets out the Council’s adopted planning strategy for the Borough. It sets out how planning and development will achieve the Reading 2020 Vision for the town. It provides a framework for how Reading can grow in a sustainable way in the future. It also sets out how Reading will accommodate the growth expected of it in the emerging South East Plan and through the council’s commitment to New Growth Point status. As part of our strategy, future development will be focused in the Central Area and in South West at Kennet Island and Green Park. The strategy Reading. Such development will grow hand in proposes further major development on the hand with improvements to the transport network. western side of the A33 to provide a new, attractive The strategy also incudes the strengthening and gateway entrance to Reading from the south. It also enhancement of District and Local Centres in the proposes new residential development at Green Borough and the potential redevelopment of land Park 3, which will in addition provide a new railway currently used for employment use into mixed use station and other essential transport infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • 30Th November 2015 the University of Reading C/O Mr Imran Shah
    30th November 2015 The University of Reading c/o Mr Imran Shah Assistant Project Manager Parsons Brinckerhoff Management Services - Sustainable Building Solutions South URS Building, Whiteknights Campus The University of Reading Shinfield Road Reading RG6 6AX Dear Imran, URS Building, The University of Reading, Whiteknights Campus – Phase 2 Bat Surveys Further to my colleague Emma Heath’s letter dated 13th February 2015, addressed to Mr Paul McAteer, which detailed the results of an Ecological Appraisal and Bat Building Inspection alongside arising recommendations, I am writing to provide the full results of the Phase 2 Bat Surveys at the URS Building. The following should be read in conjunction with the site Ecological Appraisal and Bat Building Inspection letter (EPR, 13th February 2015). This letter provides a summary of the methods and results of Phase 2 Bat Surveys carried out to assess the presence/likely absence of bats roosting in the building and using the site. An evaluation of the potential impacts of the proposals is described and recommendations provided for required mitigation in order for redevelopment to proceed in line with applicable nature conservation legislation and policy. As the full extent of the redevelopment plans have not yet been finalised, the advice provided within this letter should help inform the development of the proposals. If the final proposals extend beyond works including renovation works, cosmetic alterations such as the replacement of cladding and enclosing the existing under croft to increase the amount of usable space within the building, the advice provided within this letter may need to be updated and further surveys may need to be conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • 1) Do You Support the Council's Approach to Rejuvenating Reading's
    Appendix B SUMMARISED DETAILS OF RESPONDANTS (selected questions) 1) Do you support the council’s approach to rejuvenating Reading’s Woodlands? Yes 45 94% No 3 6% Total 48 2) Which woodland does this refer to (please tick all that apply): Count of which woodlands All woodlands 9 Furzeplat 4 All woodla nds Arthur Newbery Park 7 Furzeplat The Cowsey 3 Arthur Newbery Park Balmore Walk 3 The Cowsey Blundells Copse 16 Balmore Walk Lousehill Copse 4 Blundells Copse McIlroy Park 6 L ous ehill C ops e McIlroy Park Clayfield Copse 6 Clayfield Copse Southcote Linear Park 1 Southcote Linear Park Kings Meadow 2 Kings Meadow Rotherfield Way Copse 2 Rotherfield Way Copse Hills Meadow 1 Hills Meadow Devils Dip 1 Devils Dip Highdown Wood 1 Highdown Wood View Island 2 View Island Prospect Park 2 Prospect Park Total 70 66 3) How often do you visit one of Reading Council's Woodlands? How often do you visit? Every Day Every Day 20 43% Once per week Once per week 12 26% Twice per week Twice per week 7 15% Once per month Once per month 5 11% Never Never 1 20% Once per year Once per year 1 6% Less than once per year Less than once per year 1 13% Total 47 4) Which woodlands do you visit (please tick all that apply)? Furzeplat 5 Furzeplat Arthur Newbery Park 16 Arthur Newbery Park The Cowsey 8 The Cowsey Balmore Walk 9 Balmor e W alk Blundells Copse 22 Blundells Copse Lousehill Copse 11 Lousehill Copse McIlroy Park 17 McIlroy Park Clayfield Copse 11 Clayfield Copse Southcote Linear Park 0 Southcote Linear Park Kings Meadow 17 Kings Meadow Rotherfield Way Copse
    [Show full text]
  • Th History 16
    In and around Tilehurst A Short History of Tilehurst By Mike Keep This is the text of a talk given by Mike Keep in June 2018. Please note that the information here is copyright and belongs to its respective owners. Any information is as recalled by the person; no assurance is given as to the accuracy of these recollections. If any facts are to be relied on, the onus is on that person to check the accuracy of the facts. TILEHURST Tilehurst, as we know it today, lies on top of a hill, and although the soil on top of the hill is good rich loam, the subsoil across much of Tilehurst is clay, with gravel and chalk quite common as well. We will see the relevance of this later. Evidence of people living in Tilehurst has been shown as circa 100-500,000 years ago, and there are signs of land being worked in the early Bronze Age, c.1200 BC. Tilehurst is first named in 1291 AD, when it as listed as a hamlet of Reading in Pope Nicholas III’s taxation settlement under the ownership of Reading Abbey, where it stayed until the Dissolution of the Monastries. However, the name is almost certainly older, coming from the two Anglo Saxon words:- Tygel – tile & hurst – a wooded hill Alternative spellings down the centuries have included:- Tygelhurst 13th century Tyghelhurst 14th century Tylehurst 16th century The present spelling became commonplace in the 18thcentury. Tilehurst became an extensive parish, including the tything of Theale, as well as the manors of Tilehurst, Kentwood, Pincents and Beansheaf.
    [Show full text]