Simon Müller, Fabienne Roche, Dietrich Manzey Attitude indicator format How difficult is the transition between different reference systems? Journal article | Accepted manuscript (Postprint) This version is available at https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-10993 Müller, S., Roche, F., & Manzey, D. (2019). Attitude Indicator Format. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 9(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000168 This version of the article may not completely replicate the final authoritative version published in Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors at 10.1027/2192-0923/a000168. It is not the version of record and is therefore not suitable for citation. Please do not copy or cite without the permission of the authors. Terms of Use Copyright applies. A non-exclusive, non-transferable and limited right to use is granted. This document is intended solely for personal, non-commercial use. Running head: ATTITUDE INDICATOR FORMAT 1 Attitude Indicator Format: How Difficult Is the Transition Between Different Reference Systems? Simon Müller, Fabienne Roche, and Dietrich Manzey Work, Engineering, & Organizational Psychology, Department of Psychology and Ergo- nomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany Author Note The authors thank all experimental participants and Stephan Pietschmann for his software support. Corresponding author: Simon Müller,
[email protected], Department of Psychology and Ergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Marchstr. 12, 10587 Ber- lin, Germany ATTITUDE INDICATOR FORMAT 2 Abstract A simulator study investigated the consequences of a transition between two al- ternative formats of the attitude indictor in aircraft cockpits, the moving-horizon and moving-aircraft format. Two groups of novices practiced performing two flight tasks (flight-path tracking and recovery from unusual attitudes) with one attitude-indicator format for six practice sessions, before transitioning to the other format.