Protocol of Accepted Drinking Water Testing Methods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Protocol of Accepted Drinking Water Testing Methods Protocol of Accepted Drinking Water Testing Methods Version 2.0 This page has been intentionally left blank Protocol of Accepted Drinking Water Testing Methods Version 2.0 Laboratory Services Branch Ministry of the Environment May 2010 PIBS 4465e02 Ontario.ca/Environment © 2010, Queen’s Printer for Ontario This page has been intentionally left blank Version 2.0 May 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................3 2. SCHEDULE 1, MICROBIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS ........................4 2.1. Total Coliforms....................................................................................................................4 2.2. Escherichia coli ...................................................................................................................5 2.3. Heterotrophic Plate Count....................................................................................................7 2.4. Clostridium ..........................................................................................................................7 2.5. Cryptosporidium ..................................................................................................................8 3. SCHEDULE 2, CHEMICAL PARAMETERS...........................................8 3.1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).................................................................................8 3.2. Trace Metals.......................................................................................................................10 3.3. Mercury..............................................................................................................................15 3.4. Nitrite, Nitrate, and Nitrate + Nitrite .................................................................................16 3.5. Triazines (N-Containing Herbicides).................................................................................18 3.6. Carbamates.........................................................................................................................19 3.7. Organochlorine Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ..................................21 3.8. Organophosphorus Pesticides............................................................................................23 3.9. Chlorophenols (CPs) & Phenoxy Acids (PAs) ..................................................................24 3.10. Quaternary Ammonium Compounds.................................................................................26 3.11. Urea Derivative..................................................................................................................27 3.12. Glyphosate .........................................................................................................................28 3.13. Fluoride..............................................................................................................................30 3.14. Benzo(a)pyrene..................................................................................................................31 3.15. Cyanide ..............................................................................................................................32 3.16. Dioxins and Furans – Toxic Equivalent Quantity..............................................................33 3.16.1 Dioxins and Furans – Calculation of Toxic Equivalent Quantity (TEQ)...............34 3.17. Nitrilotriacetic Acid (NTA)...............................................................................................35 3.18. N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA)....................................................................................35 3.19. Bromate..............................................................................................................................36 - 1 - Version 2.0 May 2010 3.20. Microcystin LR..................................................................................................................37 3.20.1 Screening Tests for Total Microcystins..................................................................38 3.21. Chloramines .......................................................................................................................39 4. ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS (CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OR MINISTRY ORDERS) ..........................................................................................39 4.1. Sodium ...............................................................................................................................39 4.2. Ammonia............................................................................................................................41 4.3. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (5-Day BOD)....................................................................42 4.4. Bromide, Chlorate and Chlorite.........................................................................................42 4.5. Chemical Oxygen Demand................................................................................................44 4.6. Haloacetic Acids................................................................................................................45 4.7. Hexavalent Chromium.......................................................................................................46 4.8. Ortho-phosphate.................................................................................................................47 4.9. Phenolic Compounds – Total (4AAP) ...............................................................................48 4.10. Silica ..................................................................................................................................49 4.11. Taste and Odour Compounds.............................................................................................50 4.12. Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) .........................................................................................51 4.13. Total Phosphorus...............................................................................................................52 4.14. Formaldehyde ....................................................................................................................53 4.15. Emerging Complex Contaminants.....................................................................................54 5. ACRONYMS................................................................................................55 6. HISTORY OF CHANGES .........................................................................56 6.1 Version 1.0, March 17, 2008 .............................................................................................56 6.2 Version 2.0, May, 2010......................................................................................................58 «Cette publication hautement spécialisée n’est disponible qu’en anglais en vertu du règlement 441/97, qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en français, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l’Environnement au 416 235- 6348.» - 2 - Version 2.0 May 2010 1. INTRODUCTION This document sets out testing methods that may be used for the conduct of tests of Ontario drinking water. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002, only licensed laboratories located in Ontario and eligible out-of-province laboratories may conduct tests on samples of drinking water. In addition, a laboratory must be accredited for the selected method by: the Standards Council of Canada (SCC); by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation (CALA); by an accreditation body that, in the Director’s opinion, is equivalent to the SCC; or the laboratory must be authorized by the Director to conduct a particular test without accreditation, in accordance with the provisions of the Act. In addition to these requirements, a laboratory must use validated methods for the parameters outlined in this document, to conduct drinking water tests, including demonstrating that they meet or exceed the required reporting detection limit (RDL). The methods that follow are derived from one of five sources: 1. Methods used by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Laboratory Services Branch (LaSB) for the testing of drinking water for which the laboratory has been accredited through the SCC or CALA. Requests for these methods can be sent to [email protected]. These methods are indicated as LaSB Method. 2. Methods as described in the reference Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edition, 1998, and 21st Edition, 2005, American Public Health Association, American Waterworks Association (AWWA), Water Environmental Federation. These methods are indicated as AWWA Method. 3. Methods of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) available through the USEPA (www.epa.gov), the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, or the National Environmental Methods Index (www.nemi.gov). These methods are indicated as US EPA Method. 4. Methods of ASTM International (formerly the American Society for Testing and Materials) (ASTM), Vol. 11.01 and 11.02, 2008, available from ASTM International, www.astm.org. These methods are indicated as ASTM Method. 5. Methods approved by AOAC International (formerly the Association of Official Analytical Chemists) in the “Official
Recommended publications
  • Cryptosporidium and Water
    Cryptosporidium and Water: A Public Health Handbook 1997 WG WCWorking Group on Waterborne Cryptosporidiosis Suggested Citation Cryptosporidium and Water: A Public Health Handbook. Atlanta, Georgia: Working Group on Waterborne Cryptosporidiosis. CDCENTERS FOR DISEASEC CONTROL AND PREVENTION For additional copies of this handbook, write to: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Infectious Diseases Division of Parasitic Diseases Mailstop F-22 4770 Buford Highway N.E. Atlanta, GA 30341-3724 CONTENTS Executive Summary Introduction 1- Coordination and Preparation 2- Epidemiologic Surveillance 3- Clinical Laboratory Testing 4- Evaluating Water Test Results Drinking Water Sources, Treatment, and Testing Environmental Sampling Methods Issuing and Rescinding a Boil Water Advisory 5- Outbreak Management Outbreak Assessment News Release Information Frequently Asked Questions Protocols for Special Audiences and Contingencies 6- Educational Information Preventing Cryptosporidiosis: A Guide for Persons With HIV and AIDS Preventing Cryptosporidiosis: A Guide for the Public Preventing Cryptosporidiosis: A Guide to Water Filters and Bottled Water 7- Recreational Water Appendix Selected Articles Key Words and Phrases Figures A-F Index Working Group on Waterborne Cryptosporidiosis (WGWC) Daniel G. Colley and Dennis D. Juranek, Coordinators, WGWC Division of Parasitic Diseases (DPD) National Center for Infectious Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Scott A. Damon, Publications Coordinator, WGWC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Margaret Hurd, Communications Coordinator, WGWC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Mary E. Bartlett, DPD Editor, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Leslie S. Parker, Visual Information Specialist, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Task Forces and Other Contributors: The draft materials for this handbook were developed through the work of multiple task forces and individuals whose names appear at the beginning of each chapter/section.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Ozonation on Levels of the Off-Flavor Compounds Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Water and Rainbow Trout Oncorhyn
    Aquacultural Engineering 43 (2010) 46–50 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquacultural Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aqua-online Evaluation of ozonation on levels of the off-flavor compounds geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol in water and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from recirculating aquaculture systems Kevin K. Schrader a,∗, John W. Davidson b, Agnes M. Rimando a, Steven T. Summerfelt b a United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Natural Products Utilization Research Unit, National Center for Natural Products Research, Post Office Box 8048, University, MS 38677-8048, USA View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE b The Conservation Fund Freshwater Institute, 1098 Turner Road, Shepherdstown, WV 25443, USA provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector article info abstract Article history: Common “off-flavors” in fish cultured in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) are “earthy” and “musty” Received 29 January 2010 due to the presence of the off-flavor metabolites geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol (MIB), respectively. Accepted 17 May 2010 Previously, ozone addition has been applied to RAS at relatively low doses to break refractory organic molecules (i.e., reducing color), microflocculate fine particulate matter (i.e., increasing solids removal), Keywords: and oxidize nitrite to nitrate, but the effect of ozone addition at these dosing rates on levels of off-flavor Aquaculture compounds was unknown. Ozonation has been used in municipal drinking water facilities to reduce the Geosmin levels of these compounds, to improve water taste, and to subsequently reduce consumer complaints. In 2-Methylisoborneol Off-flavor this study, the effects of ozone addition to the inlet water of the RAS culture tanks on levels of geosmin Ozone and MIB in the culture water and fish flesh were evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
    National Primary Drinking Water Regulations Potential health effects MCL or TT1 Common sources of contaminant in Public Health Contaminant from long-term3 exposure (mg/L)2 drinking water Goal (mg/L)2 above the MCL Nervous system or blood Added to water during sewage/ Acrylamide TT4 problems; increased risk of cancer wastewater treatment zero Eye, liver, kidney, or spleen Runoff from herbicide used on row Alachlor 0.002 problems; anemia; increased risk crops zero of cancer Erosion of natural deposits of certain 15 picocuries Alpha/photon minerals that are radioactive and per Liter Increased risk of cancer emitters may emit a form of radiation known zero (pCi/L) as alpha radiation Discharge from petroleum refineries; Increase in blood cholesterol; Antimony 0.006 fire retardants; ceramics; electronics; decrease in blood sugar 0.006 solder Skin damage or problems with Erosion of natural deposits; runoff Arsenic 0.010 circulatory systems, and may have from orchards; runoff from glass & 0 increased risk of getting cancer electronics production wastes Asbestos 7 million Increased risk of developing Decay of asbestos cement in water (fibers >10 fibers per Liter benign intestinal polyps mains; erosion of natural deposits 7 MFL micrometers) (MFL) Cardiovascular system or Runoff from herbicide used on row Atrazine 0.003 reproductive problems crops 0.003 Discharge of drilling wastes; discharge Barium 2 Increase in blood pressure from metal refineries; erosion 2 of natural deposits Anemia; decrease in blood Discharge from factories; leaching Benzene
    [Show full text]
  • Geosmin and 2-MIB Removal by Full-Scale Drinking Water Treatment Processes in the Republic of Korea
    water Article Geosmin and 2-MIB Removal by Full-Scale Drinking Water Treatment Processes in the Republic of Korea Keug Tae Kim 1 and Yong-Gyun Park 2,* 1 Department of Environmental & Energy Engineering, Suwon University, 17 Wauan-gil, Bongdam-eup, Hwaseong-si 18323, Korea; [email protected] 2 Pioneer Team Research Institute, GS Engineering &Construction, 33, Jong-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul 03159, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Due to climate change, population growth, industrialization, urbanization, and water contamination, it is becoming more difficult to secure and supply clean and safe drinking water. One of the challenges many water utilities often face is the taste and odor (T&O) problem in drinking water treatment plants, mostly associated with geosmin and 2-MIB. These representative T&O compounds are mainly produced by the metabolism of blue-green algae (cyanobacteria), especially in summer. In this study, the correlation between algae blooms and T&O compounds was identified in the intake and raw water of a large-scale water treatment plant in the Republic of Korea. The removal efficiency of geosmin and 2-MIB by each treatment process was intensively evaluated. According to the obtained results, ozonation and granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption were more effective for removing the troublesome compounds compared to other water treatment processes, such as coagulation/flocculation, filtration, and chlorination. Because of their seasonal concentration variation and different removal rates, optimal operation methods need to be developed and implemented for drinking water treatment plants to solve the T&O problems. Citation: Kim, K.T.; Park, Y.-G.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality and Relation to Taste-And-Odor Compounds in the North Fork Ninnescah River and Cheney Reservoir South-Central Kans
    Prepared in cooperation with the City of Wichita, Kansas Water Quality and Relation to Taste-and-Odor Compounds in the North Fork Ninnescah River and Cheney Reservoir, South-Central Kansas, 1997–2003 Scientific Investigations Report 2006−5095 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Quality and Relation to Taste-and- Odor Compounds in the North Fork Ninnescah River and Cheney Reservoir, South-Central Kansas, 1997–2003 By Victoria G. Christensen, Jennifer L. Graham, Chad R. Milligan, Larry M. Pope, and Andrew C. Ziegler Prepared in cooperation with the City of Wichita, Kansas Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5095 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior P. Lynn Scarlett, Acting Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Christensen, V.G., Graham, J.L., Milligan, C.R., Pope, L.M., and Ziegler, A.C., 2006, Water quality and relation to taste- and-odor compounds in the North Fork Ninnescah River and Cheney Reservoir, south-central Kansas, 1997–2003: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Public Health Legal Guide to Safe Drinking Water
    A Public Health Legal Guide to Safe Drinking Water Prepared by Alisha Duggal, Shannon Frede, and Taylor Kasky, student attorneys in the Public Health Law Clinic at the University of Maryland Carey School of Law, under the supervision of Professors Kathleen Hoke and William Piermattei. Generous funding provided by the Partnership for Public Health Law, comprised of the American Public Health Association, Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, National Association of County & City Health Officials, and the National Association of Local Boards of Health August 2015 THE PROBLEM: DRINKING WATER CONTAMINATION Clean drinking water is essential to public health. Contaminated water is a grave health risk and, despite great progress over the past 40 years, continues to threaten U.S. communities’ health and quality of life. Our water resources still lack basic protections, making them vulnerable to pollution from fracking, farm runoff, industrial discharges and neglected water infrastructure. In the U.S., treatment and distribution of safe drinking water has all but eliminated diseases such as cholera, typhoid fever, dysentery and hepatitis A that continue to plague many parts of the world. However, despite these successes, an estimated 19.5 million Americans fall ill each year from drinking water contaminated with parasites, bacteria or viruses. In recent years, 40 percent of the nation’s community water systems violated the Safe Drinking Water Act at least once.1 Those violations ranged from failing to maintain proper paperwork to allowing carcinogens into tap water. Approximately 23 million people received drinking water from municipal systems that violated at least one health-based standard.2 In some cases, these violations can cause sickness quickly; in others, pollutants such as inorganic toxins and heavy metals can accumulate in the body for years or decades before contributing to serious health problems.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cincinnati
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________ I, _________________________________________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: in: It is entitled: This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ AMPEROMETRIC CHARACTERIZATION OF A NANO INTERDIGITATED ARRAY (nIDA) ELECTRODE AS AN ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSOR A thesis submitted to The Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science of the College of Engineering August 1, 2006 By Ashwin Kumar Samarao B.E. (Hons.) Electrical and Electronics Birla Institute of Technology and Science, India, 2004 Committee chairman Dr.Chong H. Ahn ABSTRACT The main goal of this research is to amperometrically characterize a ring type nano interdigitated array (nIDA) electrode as an electrochemical sensor and to verify the enhancements in the sensitivity of such a sensor when compared to its micro counterparts. Each electrode was fabricated in gold with 275 fingers, each of width 100 nm and spacing 200 nm, using electron beam lithography and nano lift-off processes on a SiO2/Si wafer. The reference and counter electrodes were fabricated using electroplating. P – Aminophenol (PAP) was used as the redox species to be detected by the nano- IDA electrochemical sensor. Using Chronoamperometry, concentrations of PAP as low as 10 pM were successfully detected using the fabricated sensor. The current output by the sensor for such low concentrations was in the pico-ampere range and was measured using a very sensitive pico-ammeter.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 1 Introduction to Electro- Analytical Methods
    Introduction to UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION TO ELECTRO- Electroanalytical ANALYTICAL METHODS Methods Structure 1.1 Introduction Objectives 1.2 Basic Concepts Electrical Units Basic Laws of Electrochemistry Electrode Potential Liquid-Junction Potentials Electrochemical Cells The Nernst Equation Cell Potential 1.3 Classification and an Overview of Electroanalytical Methods Potentiometry Voltammetry Polarography Amperometry Electrogravimetry and Coulometry Conductometry 1.4 Classification and Relationships of Electroanalytical Methods 1.5 Summary 1.6 Terminal Questions 1.7 Answers 1.1 INTRODUCTION This is the first unit of this course. This unit deals with the fundamentals of electrochemistry that are necessary for understanding the principles of electroanalytical methods discussed in this Unit 2 to 9. In this unit we have also classified of electroanalytical methods and briefly introduced of some important electroanalytical methods. More details of these elecroanalytical methods will be discussed in the consecutive units. Objectives After studying this unit, you will be able to: • name the different units of electrical quantities, • define the two basic laws of electrochemistry, • describe the single electrode potential and the potential of a galvanic cell, • derive the Nernst expression and give its applications, • calculate the electrode potentials and cell potentials using Nernst equation, • describe the basis for classification of the electroanalytical techniques, and • explain the basis principles and describe the essential conditions of the various electroanalytical techniques. 1.2 BASIC CONCEPTS Before going in detail of different electroanalytical techniques, let’s recapitulate some basic concepts which you have studied in your undergraduate classes. 7 Electroanalytical 1.2.1 Electrical Units Methods -I Ampere (A): Ampere is the unit of current.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Data Sheet
    SAFETY DATA SHEET According to JIS Z 7253:2019 Revision Date 16-Feb-2021 Version 7.01 Section 1: PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product name (±)-Geosmin-d3 Standard Solution (1mg/mL Methanol Solution) Product code 072-06081 Manufacturer FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation 1-2 Doshomachi 3-Chome Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-8605, Japan Phone: +81-6-6203-3741 Fax: +81-6-6203-5964 Supplier FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation 1-2 Doshomachi 3-Chome, Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-8605, Japan Phone: +81-6-6203-3741 Fax: +81-6-6203-2029 Emergency telephone number +81-6-6203-3741 / +81-3-3270-8571 Recommended uses and For research use only restrictions on use Section 2: HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION GHS classification Classification of the substance or mixture Flammable liquids Category 2 Acute toxicity - Oral Category 4 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2A Reproductive Toxicity Category 1B Specific target organ toxicity (single exposure) Category 1, Category 3 Category 1 central nervous system, Visual organ, systemic toxicity Category 3 Narcotic effects Specific target organ toxicity (repeated exposure) Category 1 Category 1 central nervous system, Visual organ Pictograms Signal word Danger Hazard statements H225 - Highly flammable liquid and vapor H319 - Causes serious eye irritation H302 - Harmful if swallowed H360 - May damage fertility or the unborn child H336 - May cause drowsiness or dizziness H370 - Causes damage to the following organs: central nervous system, Visual organ, systemic toxicity H372 - Causes damage to the following organs through
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Monitoring
    Intermediate Student Guide to Water Quality Monitoring Developed in cooperation with the Texas Stream Team. Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority flowing solutions Monitoring Manual Intermediate School Level Introduction to Student Field Guide The Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority and Texas Stream Team encourages ordinary folks to be curious about how clean the water is in their creeks, rivers, and ponds. The program teaches citizens how to spot problems in water quality. Before we get started, we should discuss the term “water quality”. When we observe a water body like a creek or river, we look at the condition of the water – does it appear clear? Does it have a smell? Is the water moving, or is it still? Answering these types of questions tell us about the quality of the water. Did you ever stop to think about water as being healthy or non-healthy? Sure you did! Just think about it…. You’ve likely seen nice clean streams or rivers…. These are examples of ‘good’ water quality. You may have also observed water that is not too appealing…or ‘poor’ water quality. When you make these simple observations, you are judging the health of the water. Ok, we’ve made it pretty clear -- when we are involved in water quality studies, we are determining the health of a body of water. This guide will assist you in learning how to identify if there are any problems in water quality. You will work with a nearby creek, river, or lake – your teacher will decide what your study area will be. You will learn how to conduct simple tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis-1961-B586i.Pdf
    INVESTIGATION OF SOME POSSIBILITIES FOR AMPEROMETRIC TITRATION OF CERTAIN METAL IONS WITH OXINE By Donald George Biechler I I Bachelor of Science University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin 1956 Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 1961 INVESTIGATION OF SOME POSSIBILITIES FOR AMPEROMEI'RIC TITRATION OF CERTAIN MEI'AL IONS WITH OXINE Thesis Approved: Thesis Adviser i i OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY llBRARY JAN 2 1962 PREFACE Oxine (8-hydroxyquinoline) is most generally used in analytical chemistry as a precipitant for metals and is known to form water- insoluble chelates with better than thirty metal ions (3). There exists in solutions of oxine a tautomeric equilibrium of the fol- lowing type: C C C C /~/'\ ,c/""/~ C C f ij 1 I II I C C C C C C ~/"'/C N ~/C "+/N r . _I I 0 H 0--------H Chelation of a metal ion involves replacement of the proton and for- mation of a coordinate bond with the nitrogen to form a stable 5 membered ring compound. Thus nickel, a bivalent cation, would form a compound with the following structure: 4810 90 iii iv The oxinates can be ignited and weighed as such or they may be further ignited to the metal oxides and then weighed. Alternately the oxinates may be dissolved in acid and quantitatively brominated (7)0 Considering the number of metal ions that are precipitated by oxine, it seemed that possibly more use could be made of the reagent in volumetric analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater Part 1000 INTRODUCTION 1010 INTRODUCTION 1010 A. Scope and Application of Methods The procedures described in these standards are intended for the examination of waters of a wide range of quality, including water suitable for domestic or industrial supplies, surface water, ground water, cooling or circulating water, boiler water, boiler feed water, treated and untreated municipal or industrial wastewater, and saline water. The unity of the fields of water supply, receiving water quality, and wastewater treatment and disposal is recognized by presenting methods of analysis for each constituent in a single section for all types of waters. An effort has been made to present methods that apply generally. Where alternative methods are necessary for samples of different composition, the basis for selecting the most appropriate method is presented as clearly as possible. However, samples with extreme concentrations or otherwise unusual compositions or characteristics may present difficulties that preclude the direct use of these methods. Hence, some modification of a procedure may be necessary in specific instances. Whenever a procedure is modified, the analyst should state plainly the nature of modification in the report of results. Certain procedures are intended for use with sludges and sediments. Here again, the effort has been to present methods of the widest possible application, but when chemical sludges or slurries or other samples of highly unusual composition are encountered, the methods of this manual may require modification or may be inappropriate. Most of the methods included here have been endorsed by regulatory agencies. Procedural modification without formal approval may be unacceptable to a regulatory body.
    [Show full text]