Thomas Chatterton, the Marvelous Boy; the Story of a Strange Life 1752

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thomas Chatterton, the Marvelous Boy; the Story of a Strange Life 1752 THOMAS CHATTERTON Z 5 p - ^ 5 ^ THOMAS CHATTERTON THE MARVELOUS BOY THE STORY OF A STRANGE LIFE 1752-1770 BY CHARLES EDWARD RUSSELL ILLUSTRATED NEW YORK MOFFAT, YARD & COMPANY 1908 Copyright, 1908, by MOFFAT, YARD & COMPANY NEW YORK All rights reserved Published, March, igo8 The Plimpton Press Norwood Mass. USA. THOMAS CHATTERTON With Shakespeare's manhood at a boy's wild heart, Through Hamlet's doubt to Shakespeare near allied And kin to Milton through his Satan's pride, At Death's sole door he stooped, and craved a dart; And to the dear new bower of England's art, Even to that shrine Time else had deified, The unuttered heart that soared against his side, Drove the fell point, and smote life's seals apart. Thy nested home-loves, noble Chatterton, The angel-trodden stair thy soul could trace Up Redcliffe's spire; and in the world's armed space Thy gallant sword-play: these to many an one Are sweet forever; as thy grave unknown And love-dream of thine unrecorded face. DANTE GABRIEL ROSSETTI, "Five English Poets. CONTENTS CHAPTER I MOB AN EARLY DAY SCHOLAR IN POLITICS i CHAPTER II DREAMS AND REALITIES 13 CHAPTER III THE RIFT IN THE CLOUDS 4-Q CHAPTER IV THE TRADE OF A SCRIVENER 61 CHAPTER V THE RISING FLAME "7 CHAPTER VI Now CRACKS A NOBLE HEART 19 CHAPTER VII THE WORLD'S VERDICT 225 vin CONTENTS APPENDIX I PAGE HISTORIE OF PEYNCTERS YN ENGLANDE 269 APPENDIX II WILLIAM CANYNGE 274 APPENDIX III CANYNGE AND ROWLEY 277 APPENDIX IV THE ROWLEY CONTROVERSY 282 INDEX 287 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Chatterton Frontispiece (From the painting of Henry Wallis, RW.S., National Gallery of British Art.) The Famous North Porch of St. Mary Redcliffe ... 6 Colston's School, as it was in Chatterton's Time ... 30 (From an old water-color in the Bristol Museum.) The Bristol Bridge, that was built in Chatterton's Time . 64 (From an old water-color in the Bristol Museum.) The Supposed Portrait of Chatterton 94 (From a Photograph in the possession of Mr. Edward Bell) Two Specimens of Chatterton's Work 106 1. Photographic copy of the parchment, purporting to be the original of a poem by Rowley. 2. The Arms of Canynge as designed by Chatterton. The House where Chatterton Died, No. 39 Brooke Street, London 222 (From an old print in the possession of the Bristol Museum.) St. Mary Redcliffe, from the North 258 CHRONOLOGY OF THOMAS CHATTERTON Born at Bristol November 20, 1752 Admitted to Colston's Charity School .... August, 1760 Wrote his first extant poem when ten years old December, 1 762 Published it ("On the Last Epiphany") . January 8, 1763 Published "The Church-Warden and the Apparition" January 7, 1764 Left Colston's, apprenticed to Lawyer Lam- bert July I, 1767 Published the account of the opening of the Old Bridge September, 1768 Completed "Aella, a Tragycal Enterlude" before December, 1768 Correspondence with Horace Walpole .... March to July, 1769 Completed his satirical poem "Kew Gar- dens" about March, 1769 Had his Indenture cancelled April 16, 1770 Started for London April 23, 1770 His friend, Lord Mayor Beckford, died . June 19, 1770 his 1 Completed "Balade of Charitie" J uty> 77 Killed himself in Brooke Street, London . August 24, 1770 AMONG HIS CONTEMPORARIES WERE: Dr. Samuel Johnson 1709-1784 James Boswell 1740-1795 Edward Young 1681-1765 xii CHRONOLOGY OF THOMAS CHATTERTON Thomas Gray 1716-1771 William Collins 1720-1756 Mark Akenside 1721-1770 Oliver Goldsmith 1728-1774 Bishop Percy 1728-1811 William Cowper 1731-1800 Charles Churchill 1731-1764 George Crabbe 1754-1832 William Shenstone 1714-1763 William Mason 1724-1797 "Ossian" Macpherson 1738-1796 Hannah More I 745~ l %33 Joseph Warton 1722-1800 David Garrick 1717-1779 Richard Brinsley Sheridan 1751-1816 Sir Joshua Reynolds 1723-1792 Thomas Gainsborough 1727-1788 The Elder Pitt 1708-1778 Horace Walpole 1717-1797 Lawrence Sterne 1713-1768 Tobias George Smollett 1721-1771 Samuel Richardson 1689-1761 William Blackstone .'. .1723-1780 William Herschel 1738-1822 PREFATORY NOTE HAVE tried in these pages to set forth the plain I records of this extraordinary story with hope to do something, however little, however poor and in- adequate, to clear from calumny and undeserved reproach the memory of one of the greatest minds and sweetest souls that ever dwelt upon this earth. That in the short span of his unhappy life this boy should have produced works of the first order of genius, works ever since the marvel of all persons that have considered them, works profoundly affect- ing the body and the development of English poetry, is the most amazing fact in literature. Next to it in wonder I place the fact that this great spirit, this artist and poet, this lover and benefactor of his kind, this assailant of absolutism, this boy hero of revolt, this leader at seventeen in the army of man, has been kept by false report and malignant slander from his true place in the affections of the race he labored for. And next to this I place the fact, herein, I think, for the first time made clear, that all of these false reports and all of these slanders had no other origin than the petty malice of a spiteful xiv PREFATORY NOTE and vindictive old man. For I deem it impossible to come from any impartial and first-hand investi- without the conviction that gation of these matters Thomas Chatterton would never have been called a Literary Forger, would never have been a moral warning to the young nor an outcast among the men of letters, if he had not offended Horace Walpole, Earl of Orford. With what monstrous injustice he has been branded with that word Forger, how unreasonably he has been assailed, how far his actual life, full of love, tenderness, and good deeds, was above the libels that have been cast upon it, I have labored here to make plain. For the first time the state- ments derogatory to Chatterton's character have been traced from hand to hand back to the one fountain head, identical in each instance; and for the first time an attempt has been made to compare the accepted narrative with the available records. It may ease others as I was eased to know that the wonderful boy, whose days were so unutterably sad and lonely and whose heart was so infallibly kind, was not a libertine, was not dissolute, was not venal, and was not a Literary Forger. And it may instruct others as I was profoundly instructed to know that in the remarkable vitality of these monstrous false- hoods he has paid the penalty for attacking privilege and championing the cause of mankind. For in more PREFATORY NOTE XV ways than one this boy has been a martyr of democ- racy, and no one may doubt that if he had fought for absolutism as fiercely as he attacked it, there would now be no need to defend his reputation. It is time to have done with the prejudice and bigotry that have obscured this glorious name. The world crushed out the life of Thomas Chatterton when he was still a boy. That ought to be enough. With cudgel and savage injustice and cruelty and privation it embittered almost every moment of his existence. That ought to be enough. For more than one hundred years it has dwelt with moral edification upon his poor little errors. That ought to be enough. Possibly now is more profit to be had from considering his magnificent art, the products of his unequaled genius and the natural goodness of his heart. To try in some way to further such consideration was the object of this book. Some obstacle to a wide reading of Chatterton has been found in the strange and antique garb of the Rowley poems. An attempt is made here to show how slight is this obstacle by printing examples of the poems in their original and others in a modernized form. There will also be found analyses of musical themes employed by Chatterton that may seem to exhibit more clearly the unusual nature of his endowment and the essential beauty of his work. The materials here used have been drawn chiefly xvi PREFATORY NOTE from the invaluable collection of books, documents, and letters referring to Chatterton, now preserved in the Bristol Museum and Library. The discovery that Barrett knew of and aided the attempted im- Mr. Edward Bell had posture upon Walpole briefly noted among the documents in the British Museum, and further investigation, following this vital fact, seemed to show the whole of Barrett's conduct in small to blame the a light that leaves room boy and much to doubt the man. Of the extant biographies I have found that of Professor Wil- son and the short life written by Mr. Bell (and used as a preface to Skeat's edition of Chatter- ton's poems), to be the most accurate as they are also the most interesting and sympathetic. The other lives, being made up chiefly from the errors of Dix and Chalmers, are not available for the purposes of the modern biographer. I have been at pains to verify, so far as possible, from the original sources, all the statements made here con- cerning Chatterton's career; and whether the result be ill or good, at least this is true, that nothing has been taken for granted nor accepted on light evi- dence. I should be much to blame if I omitted from this note an expression of my gratitude to the good city of Bristol that, with a universal and genuine kind- ness, so long and so often harbored me and fur- PREFATORY NOTE xvii thered in every way my design.
Recommended publications
  • Bristol Office Locator
    Office Locator KPMG LLP (UK) 66 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4BE Switchboard: 0117 905 4200 M4 Junction 19 Pupert St Bristol Marriott Perry Rd Visiting or travelling to Bristol Bristol Bierkeller Hotel City Centre A420 Castle Park Park Row Broad St Car Small St A4044 M4 Junction 19, exit onto M32 towards Bristol Colston Hall O2 Academy Bristol Bristol M32 Parkway Continue onto Newfoundland St/A4032 Bristol Hippodrome Baldwin St Old Bread St Theatre Temple Back Continue to follow A4032 The Fleece Slight left onto Temple Way/A4044 Victoria St Continue to follow A4044 King St At the roundabout, take the 2nd exit onto TempleWay Bristol Aquarium Temple Gate/A4 Prince St Queen Square At-Bristol Science Centre At the roundabout, take the 4th exit and Welesh Back tS ffilcdeR tS Waterfront Redcliffe Way stay on Temple Gate/A4 The Grove Square Bristol Templetemple Meads Thekla Continue straight onto Redcliffe Way/A4044 Redcliffe Way Temple Gate At the roundabout, take the 2nd exit onto St Mary Redcliffe Church River Avon Redcliffe Way M Shed Rd Wapping Guinea St At the roundabout, take the 1st exit onto Redcliffe Hill The Grove Somerset St Fowlers of Bristol Commercial Rd Turn right onto Prince St River Avon A370 Turn right onto Middle Ave River Avon Clarence Rd Turn left onto Queen Square Destination will be on the left Source: KPMG LLP (UK) SAT NAV post code is BS1 4JP Rail The nearest station is Bristol Temple Meads, which is a ten minute walk from the office. Parking Parking is only available for Clients www.kpmg.co.uk kpmg.com/uk © 2017 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG Intaernational Cooperative, a Swiss entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Archdeaconry of Bristol) Which Is Part of the Diocese of Bristol
    Bristol Archives Handlist of parish registers, non-conformist registers and bishop’s transcripts Website www.bristolmuseums.org.uk/bristol-archives Online catalogue archives.bristol.gov.uk Email enquiries [email protected] Updated 15 November 2016 1 Parish registers, non-conformist registers and bishop’s transcripts in Bristol Archives This handlist is a guide to the baptism, marriage and burial registers and bishop’s transcripts held at Bristol Archives. Please note that the list does not provide the contents of the records. Also, although it includes covering dates, the registers may not cover every year and there may be gaps in entries. In particular, there are large gaps in many of the bishop’s transcripts. Church of England records Parish registers We hold registers and records of parishes in the City and Deanery of Bristol (later the Archdeaconry of Bristol) which is part of the Diocese of Bristol. These cover: The city of Bristol Some parishes in southern Gloucestershire, north and east of Bristol A few parishes in north Somerset Some registers date from 1538, when parish registers were first introduced. Bishop’s transcripts We hold bishop’s transcripts for the areas listed above, as well as several Wiltshire parishes. We also hold microfiche copies of bishop’s transcripts for a few parishes in the Diocese of Bath and Wells. Bishop’s transcripts are a useful substitute when original registers have not survived. In particular, records of the following churches were destroyed or damaged in the Blitz during the Second World War: St Peter, St Mary le Port, St Paul Bedminster and Temple.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Redcliffe (SPD 3)
    Future of Redcliffe FOREWORD The Future of Redcliffe Supplementary Planning Document has been guided by a groundbreaking initiative between Bristol City Council and the local community of Redcliffe working together on how the area shall be developed. Redcliffe Futures* brings together residents, businesses, developers and other agencies in a partnership where everyone can have a say about the changes happening in the area. The group started developing these ideas in 2001 and published the Redcliffe Neighbourhood Framework in November 2002. “Redcliffe Futures has been fully involved in developing this SPD. Both the Neighbourhood Framework and General Principles are the foundations of this Supplementary Planning Document and the Council thanks the group for all their hard work in helping to prepare this document. The Council and community now wish to work with landowners and developers to deliver the vision of this SPD.” Councillor Dennis Brown, Executive Member for Transport and Development Control, Bristol City Council * The group’s membership has included representatives from: Avon Fire Brigade, Arup, Business West, Bristol City Council, Bristol Civic Society, South West Primary Care Trust, Bristol Urban Villages Initiative, Buchanans' Wharf Management Company, Lyons Davidson Solicitors, Midshires Estates Ltd, Pattersons (Bristol) Ltd, Redcliffe Community Forum, Redcliffe Residents Association, Redcliffe Parade Environmental Association, St Mary Redcliffe Church, English Heritage, St Mary Redcliffe Church of England Primary School, United Bristol Healthcare Trust (UBHT), Custom House Management Company, Beckett Hall, Byzantium Restaurant. i Supplementary Planning Document Number 3 THE VISION FOR REDCLIFFE IS: A sustainable neighbourhood of compact, mixed-use development that is human-scale, accessible to all and respectful of the area’s history and character.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol Archaeological Research Group 4
    ISSN 0144 6576 □ ISSUE No. 2 1981 BRISTOLARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH GROUP 4 ...... GI oucestershire SITE LOCATION PLAN \ ·"' ......·-, . 0 mil.. 5 I I,, ,1 ' '· ,, I I 0 kilamelres 8 I. \. .-. ,,,, ' I 'I •. I .... Avon ·-----\ ' -Jf WESTBURY - _ \ .-. I' MARSHFIELD ' ,I , * I , -Jf REDCLIFFE WRAXALL ;* I ; * I BEDMINSTER 'I I... - - - _, 'I I ·' *KELSTON ! ' I • ....\ ,/~-;- ' ,. - . ' Wilts. I. - . ' _.,,. .... -·•• ,., ....... -· - ·' .,,... I·"' \ ,·-·- ,,,, I ' Somerset I ,, -· ,I ·- · ......--· BARGCOMMITTEE 1981-82 Chairman D Dawson Vice-chairman ••...........••... R Knight Secretary •••......••.. T Coulson Membership Secretary •.... Mrs J Harrison Treasurer •••.........• J Russell Special Publications Editor .. L Grinsell Review Editor .••....••••. R Iles Secretary for Associates •.••. S Reynolds Fieldwork Advisor ••.. M Ponsford Parish Survey Organiser .. Mrs M Campbell Publicity Officer .• Mrs P Belsey Miss E Sabin, M Dunn, R Williams, J Seysell, A Parker, M Aston, Mrs M Ashley BARGMEMBERSHIP Ordinary members ...•.•.••.•• £4.00 Joint (husband and wife) ••.• £6.00 Senior Citizen or student ••• £2,80 Associate (under 18) ••••.••• £1.00 The official address of Bristol Archaeological Research Group is: BARG, Bristol City Museum, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RL. Further copies of this Review can be obtained from the Secretary at the above address. Editorial communications should be addresed to: R Iles, 46 Shadwell Road, Bristol BS? SEP. BARGReview 2 typed by June Iles. BARGis grateful to Bristol Threatened History Society for financial
    [Show full text]
  • Character Areas 4
    Bristol Central Area Context Study Informing change Character areas 4 Bristol Central Area September 2013 Context Study - back to contents City Design Group 37 Character areas Criteria for character areas The character of each area refers to the predominant physical characteristics within each area. The The character areas have been defined using English boundaries are an attempt to define where these Heritage guidance provided in ‘Understanding Place: physical characteristics notably change, although there Historic Area Assessments: Principles and Practice’ will be design influences within neighbouring areas. (2010), although the boundaries have been adjusted to Therefore adjoining character should be considered in fit with existing Conservation Area or Neighbourhood any response to context. boundaries where practical. The key challenges and opportunities for each Detailed description of character areas has been character area are given at the end of each character provided where they intersect with the major areas of description section. These challenges are not an change as identified by the Bristol Central Area Plan. exhaustive list and are presented as the significant Summary pages have been provided for the remaining issues and potential opportunities as identified by the character areas including those within the Temple context study. Quarter Enterprise Zone (section 5). Further information about the Enterprise Zone is provided in the Temple Quarter Heritage Assessment and Temple Quarter Spatial Framework documents. Following the accepted guidelines each character area is defined by the aspects in 1.1 and primarily Topography, urban structure, scale and massing, building ages and material palette. This is in accordance with the emerging Development Management policies on local character and distinctiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • An Atlas of Post-Reformation Places of Worship Within the Central Area of the City of Bristol
    AN ATLAS OF POST-REFORMATION PLACES OF WORSHIP WITHIN THE CENTRAL AREA OF THE CITY OF BRISTOL DAVID DAWSON 2017 1 Published on the occasion of the visit of the Chapels Society to Bristol in October 2017 by David Dawson, 10 Linden Grove, Taunton, Somerset, TA1 1EF, UK © David Dawson Map key: Map 1 Inner area – parishes of All Saints, Christchurch, St Ewen, St John Baptist, St Leonard, St Mary-le-Port, St Nicholas, St Peter, St Stephen, St Werburgh and Castle Precinct. Map 2 Western Suburbs – parishes of St Augustine-the-Less and St Michael. Map 3 Broadmead and the Northern suburbs – parishes of St James Within and St Paul. Map 4 Old Market and the Eastern suburbs – parishes of SS Philip & Jacob Within and Without. Map 5 Southern suburbs – parishes of St Thomas, Redcliffe and Temple. Cover: Lewins Mead Unitarian Meeting in use in 1982. Photograph by the author. 2 AN ATLAS OF POST-REFORMATION PLACES OF WORSHIP WITHIN THE CENTRAL AREA OF THE CITY OF BRISTOL By the 14th century Bristol had developed to be the second largest town in England after London and in 1373 it was incorporated as a county in its own right separate from Gloucestershire and Somerset. It was well- endowed with parish churches and by the end of the middle ages most monastic orders were represented with their specific houses. Bristol was not created a city until the establishment of the diocese of Bristol in 1542 based on the former abbey church of St Augustine. The city expanded increasingly rapidly from the late 17th century and by the mid 19th century had well outgrown the area covered by this atlas.
    [Show full text]
  • SLAVERY & Abolition
    Bristol Insight : Open Top Bus and Walking Tours We take your group on a fully guided open top bus journey – or walking tour – taking in the important sites in Bristol linked to transatlantic slavery and its abolition. Our Tour Guides offer an informative and interactive tour introducing the controversial and often contradictory parts of Bristol’s history. This includes the city’s links to the transatlantic slave trade and the significant men and women who were involved. This can be a fully independent tour or can be linked with pick-ups/drop-offs at other locations in this leaflet. Suitable for: Key Stage 2 and above . For more details phone: 0117 971 9279 TRANSATLANTIC Email: [email protected] Website: www.bristolinsight.co.uk (and click the link for ‘Private Hire’ on the right hand side) SLAVERY & St Mary Redcliffe: Workshop and Tour Explore Bristol’s maritime history in an interactive workshop and meet the city’s explorers and merchants. AboLITIoN In this workshop we introduce the wealthy 15th century shipowner and Lord Mayor of Bristol William Canynges MP and explorer John Cabot who sailed to North America in 1497 in The Matthew. IN bRISToL We also consider the controversial merchant Edward Colston, who was both Deputy Governor of the Royal African Company, which traded in enslaved men, women and children but was also a generous benefactor within Bristol. Suitable for: Key Stage 2 and above . Tours, trips, workshops, For more details phone: 0117 231 0060 Email: sarah.yates@stmaryredcliffe.co.uk talks and exhibitions ©Emily Whitfield-Wicks Website: www.stmaryredcliffe.co.uk/education.html for schools and colleges Charity number 1134120 Each of the learning opportunities in this leaflet can be booked separately, but can also be combined for a longer visit and more enriching learning experience.
    [Show full text]
  • British Art Studies June 2017 Invention and Imagination in British
    British Art Studies June 2017 Invention and Imagination in British Art and Architecture, 600–1500 Edited by Jessica Berenbeim and Sandy Heslop British Art Studies Issue 6, published 29 June 2017 Invention and Imagination in British Art and Architecture, 600–1500 Edited by Jessica Berenbeim and Sandy Heslop Cover image: Unknown maker, Ivory Staff Terminal from Alcester, 11th Century, ivory, 14 x 5 cm. Collection of the British Museum (1903,0323.1).. Digital image courtesy of Trustees of the British Museum PDF generated on 21 July 2021 Note: British Art Studies is a digital publication and intended to be experienced online and referenced digitally. PDFs are provided for ease of reading offline. Please do not reference the PDF in academic citations: we recommend the use of DOIs (digital object identifiers) provided within the online article. Theseunique alphanumeric strings identify content and provide a persistent link to a location on the internet. A DOI is guaranteed never to change, so you can use it to link permanently to electronic documents with confidence. Published by: Paul Mellon Centre 16 Bedford Square London, WC1B 3JA https://www.paul-mellon-centre.ac.uk In partnership with: Yale Center for British Art 1080 Chapel Street New Haven, Connecticut https://britishart.yale.edu ISSN: 2058-5462 DOI: 10.17658/issn.2058-5462 URL: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk Editorial team: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk/about/editorial-team Advisory board: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk/about/advisory-board Produced in the United Kingdom. A joint publication by Contents Inventio Porticus—Imagining Solomon’s Porches in Late Medieval England, Helen Lunnon Inventio Porticus—Imagining Solomon’s Porches in Late Medieval England Helen Lunnon Abstract This paper presents a study of the iconographic relationship between medieval church porches and the porches of King Solomon.
    [Show full text]
  • James Macpherson's Ossian Poems, Oral Traditions, and the Invention Of
    Oral Tradition, 24/2 (2009): 393-414 James Macpherson’s Ossian Poems, Oral Traditions, and the Invention of Voice James Mulholland The Invention of Voice and the Intimacy of the Oral Text When James Macpherson’s Fragments of Ancient Poetry, Collected in the Highlands of Scotland, and Translated from the Galic or Erse Language appeared in 1760, it was greeted with widespread approval. Macpherson’s collection purported to translate the work of Ossian, a semi- mythical third-century C. E. Scottish bard in the mold of Homer, who preserved his culture’s traditions in song. The claim that this collection was the “genuine remains of ancient Scottish poetry” attracted passionate adherents (Macpherson 1966:A2). For nationalistic Scots, Ossian provided a tantalizing image of an advanced culture comparable to and contemporaneous with those of classical Greece and Rome. For many English authors, Ossian served as an example of native British creativity that superseded the neoclassicism of the early eighteenth century.1 Thomas Gray declared, for example, that he was in “extasie” after reading the Ossian poems and characterized Macpherson as a thrilling “demon” of poetry (Gray 1935:ii, 680). This “extasie” partly inspired Gray to compose his own imitations of Norse and Celtic folktales. Ossian’s popularity traveled widely outside of Great Britain; prominent literary and political figures, including the German author Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Thomas Jefferson, and Napoleon Bonaparte offered enthusiastic assessments of the sentimentality and humanity that they saw in the poems. The fervor of such readers was met with equally forceful skepticism. Many critics suggested that Macpherson fabricated Ossian and forged his poems to succeed in a literary marketplace that had largely ignored his earlier publications.2 Samuel Johnson unequivocally asserted that the poems cannot be “genuine remains” because, he believed, it was impossible for oral transmission to preserve poetry of any considerable length or cultural traditions of any complexity (Johnson and Boswell 1984:113-14).
    [Show full text]
  • St Mary Redcliffe and Temple School
    Determinations Case references: ADA3715 and VAR1063 Determination in relation to ADA3715 (the objection) Objector: A member of the public Admission authority: the Governing Board of St Mary Redcliffe and Temple School Date of decision: 10 August 2020 In accordance with section 88H(4) of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, I do not uphold the objection to the admission arrangements for September 2021 determined by the Governing Board of St Mary Redcliffe and Temple School for St Mary Redcliffe and Temple School, Bristol. I have also considered the arrangements in accordance with section 88I(5) and find there are other matters which do not conform with the requirements relating to admission arrangements in the ways set out in this determination. By virtue of section 88K(2) the adjudicator’s decision is binding on the admission authority. The School Admissions Code requires the admission authority to revise its admission arrangements within two months of the date of the determination. The referral 1. Under section 88H(2) of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, (the Act), an objection has been referred to the adjudicator by a member of the public (the objector) on her own behalf and on behalf of two local councillors and the Redcliffe Residents Action Group and Neighbourhood Forum, about the admission arrangements for St Mary Redcliffe and Temple School (the school), a voluntary aided Church of England secondary school for pupils aged 11 to 18 for September 2021. 2. The local authority (LA) for the area in which the school is located is Bristol City Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. The Covent Garden Jester (London: J. Roach, 1780?), p. 6; The Festival of Wit (London: M. A. Holland, 1782), p. 7. 2. William Wordsworth, Poems, in Two Volumes (London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, & Orme, 1807), vol. 1, pp. 97–105. 3. See A. D. Harvey, ‘The Cult of Chatterton amongst English Poets c.1770– c.1820’, Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 39 (1991), pp. 124–33; and John Goodridge, ‘Rowley’s Ghost: A Checklist of Creative Works Inspired by Thomas Chatterton’s Life and Writings’, Romantic Culture, pp. 262–92. 4. William Hazlitt, ‘On Swift, Young, Gray, Collins, &c.’, Lectures on the English Poets (London: Taylor and Hessey, 1818), pp. 206–44 (243). 5. Samuel Johnson, The Adventurer 115 (11 December 1753), in W. J. Bate, John M. Bullitt and L. F. Powell (eds), The Idler and The Adventurer (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1963), pp. 456–61. 6. Forger’s Shadow, p. 58. 7. Nick Groom, ‘Original Copies; Counterfeit Forgeries’, Critical Quarterly 43 (2001), pp. 6–18 (16). 8. Louise J. Kaplan, The Family Romance of the Imposter-Poet Thomas Chatterton (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1987); and Esther P. Ellinger, Thomas Chatterton, The Marvelous Boy (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1930). See also Al Alvarez, The Savage God: A Study of Suicide (New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1990 [1971]), pp. 209–34. 9. Susan Stewart, Crimes of Writing: Problems in the Containment of Representation (Durham, NC, and London: Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 120–3 and 148–55.
    [Show full text]
  • From Forger to Author: William Henry Ireland's Shakespeare Papers
    FROM FORGER TO AUTHOR: WILLIAM HENRY accepted as the dramatic idol that Garrick intended, IRELAND’S SHAKESPEARE PAPERS he had to assume a form compatible with his audience’s tastes. James Boswell attended the By John Ridpath actor’s 1769 Shakespeare Jubilee, and in a letter to The London Magazine, describes the event in neo- classicist terms typical of his age: It took over one hundred years for William Shakespeare to gain the literary pre-eminence familiar [It was] an elegant and truly classical to contemporary readers. A renewed interest in the celebration of the memory of Shakespeare, author’s work during the eighteenth century was that illustrious poet, whom all ages will marked by theatrical revivals, new editions of the admire as the world has hitherto done. It plays and renowned Shakespearean performances by was truly an antique idea, a Grecian thought, famed actor David Garrick. But with this resurgence to institute a splendid festival in honour of a in popularity, some readers began to call attention to bard.5 perceived gaps in the bard’s biography. In the mid- 1790s, these gaps were briefly filled with ‘newly In his letter Boswell goes on to call Garrick ‘the discovered’ letters, deeds and occasional poetry, colourist of Shakespeare’s soul’; Ireland’s forgeries exhibited to the public and finally published in 1796. operate on a similar impulse, adapting the life of Forged by William Henry Ireland, these documents Shakespeare to contemporary tastes much as poets refashioned Shakespeare to the tastes of his age.1 The had adapted his drama. Throughout the forgeries forger went on to make larger creative impositions we encounter Nicholas Rowe’s Shakespeare: ‘he upon the life and work of the dramatist, writing was in himself a good-natur’d man, of great himself into the playwright’s life and adapting his sweetness in his manners, and a most agreeable plays to meet eighteenth-century standards of companion’.
    [Show full text]