Appendix, Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Arrowwood

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix, Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Arrowwood Glossary accessible—Pertaining to physical access to areas canopy—A layer of foliage, generally the uppermost and activities for people of different abilities, layer, in a vegetative stand; midlevel or understory especially those with physical impairments. vegetation in multilayered stands. Canopy closure (also canopy cover) is an estimate of the amount of adaptive resource management—The rigorous overhead vegetative cover. application of management, research, and monitoring to gain information and experience CCC—See Civilian Conservation Corps. necessary to assess and modify management activities; a process that uses feedback from CCP—See comprehensive conservation plan. research, monitoring, and evaluation of management CFR—See Code of Federal Regulations. actions to support or modify objectives and strategies at all planning levels; a process in which cfs—Cubic feet per second. policy decisions are implemented within a framework of scientifically driven experiments to Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC)—Peacetime test predictions and assumptions inherent in civilian “army” established by President Franklin management plan. Analysis of results helps managers D. Roosevelt to perform conservation activities determine whether current management should from 1933–42. Activities included erosion control; continue as is or whether it should be modified to firefighting; tree planting; habitat protection; achieve desired conditions. stream improvement; and building of fire towers, roads, recreation facilities, and drainage systems. Administration Act—National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)—The codification of the general and permanent rules published in the AGNPS—Agricultural nonpoint source (model). Federal Register by the executive departments and alternative agencies of the federal government. Each volume of —A reasonable way to solve an identified the CFR is updated once each calendar year. problem or satisfy the stated need (40 CFR 1500.2); one of several different means of accomplishing compatibility determination—See compatible use. refuge purposes and goals and contributing to the Refuge System mission (“The Fish and Wildlife compatible use—A wildlife-dependent recreational Service Manual,” 602 FW 1.5). use or any other use of a refuge that, in the sound professional judgment of the director of the U.S. amphibian—A class of cold-blooded vertebrates Fish and Wildlife Service, will not materially including frogs, toads, or salamanders. interfere with or detract from the fulfillment of the annual mission of the Refuge System or the purposes of the —A plant that flowers and dies within 1 year refuge (“The Fish and Wildlife Service Manual,” 603 of germination. FW 3.6). A compatibility determination supports ATV—All-terrain vehicle. the selection of compatible uses and identified stipulations or limits necessary to ensure compatibility. baseline—A set of critical observations, data, or information used for comparison or a control. comprehensive conservation plan (CCP)—A document that describes the desired future biological control—The use of organisms or viruses conditions of the refuge and provides long-range to control invasive plants or other pests. guidance and management direction for the refuge manager to accomplish the purposes of the refuge, biological diversity, also biodiversity—The variety contribute to the mission of the Refuge System, and of life and its processes, including the variety of to meet other relevant mandates (“The Fish and living organisms, the genetic differences among Wildlife Service Manual,” 602 FW 1.5). them, and the communities and ecosystems in which they occur (“The Fish and Wildlife Service Manual,” concern—See issue. 052 FW 1.12B). The National Wildlife Refuge System’s focus is on indigenous species, biotic conspecific—An individual belonging to the same communities, and ecological processes. species as another. biotic—Pertaining to life or living organisms; caused, cool-season grasses—Grasses that begin growth produced by, or comprising living organisms. earlier in the season and often become dormant in 52 Comprehensive Conservation Plan for Arrowwood NWR, ND the summer. These grasses will germinate at lower environmental assessment (EA)—A concise public temperatures. Examples of cool-season grasses at document, prepared in compliance with the National the refuge are western wheatgrass, needle and Environmental Policy Act, that briefly discusses the thread, and green needlegrass. purpose and need for an action and alternatives to such action, and provides sufficient evidence and coteau—A hilly upland including the divide analysis of impacts to determine whether to prepare between two valleys; a divide; the side of a valley. an environmental impact statement or finding of no significant impact (40 CFR 1508.9). cover, also cover type, canopy cover—Present vegetation of an area. EPA—Environmental Protection Agency. cultural resources—The remains of sites, structures, extinction—The complete disappearance of a species or objects used by people in the past. from the earth; no longer existing. dense nesting cover (DNC)—A composition of extirpation—The extinction of a population; complete grasses and forbs that allows for a dense stand of eradication of a species within a specified area. vegetation that protects nesting birds from the view of predators, usually consisting of one to two species fauna—All the vertebrate and invertebrate animals of wheatgrass, alfalfa, and sweetclover. of an area. depredation—Destruction or consumption of eggs, federal trust resource—A trust is something managed broods, or individual wildlife due to a predatory by one entity for another who holds the ownership. animal; damage inflicted on agricultural crops or The Service holds in trust many natural resources ornamental plants by wildlife. for the people of the United States as a result of federal acts and treaties. Examples are species listed DNC—See dense nesting cover. under the Endangered Species Act, migratory birds drawdown—The act of manipulating water levels in protected by international treaties, and native plant an impoundment to allow for the natural drying-out or wildlife species found on a national wildlife refuge. cycle of a wetland. federal trust species—All species where the federal EA—See environmental assessment. government has primary jurisdiction including federally endangered or threatened species, migratory ecosystem—A dynamic and interrelating complex birds, anadromous fish, and certain marine mammals. of plant and animal communities and their associated flora—All the plant species of an area. nonliving environment; a biological community, together with its environment, functioning as a unit. FMP—Fire management plan. For administrative purposes, the Service has designated 53 ecosystems covering the United forb—A broad-leaved, herbaceous plant; a seed- States and its possessions. These ecosystems producing annual, biennial, or perennial plant that generally correspond with watershed boundaries does not develop persistent woody tissue but dies and their sizes and ecological complexity vary. down at the end of the growing season. EIS—Environmental impact statement. fragmentation—The alteration of a large block of habitat that creates isolated patches of the original emergent—A plant rooted in shallow water and habitat that are interspersed with a variety of other having most of the vegetative growth above water habitat types; the process of reducing the size and such as cattail and hardstem bulrush. connectivity of habitat patches, making movement endangered species, federal—A plant or animal of individuals or genetic information between parcels difficult or impossible. species listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, that is in danger of extinction “friends group”—Any formal organization whose throughout all or a significant portion of its range. mission is to support the goals and purposes of its endangered species, state—A plant or animal associated refuge and the National Wildlife Refuge species in danger of becoming extinct or extirpated Association overall; “friends” organizations and cooperative and interpretive associations. in a particular state within the near future if factors contributing to its decline continue. Populations of FWS—See U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. these species are at critically low levels or their habitats have been degraded or depleted to a geographic information system (GIS)—A computer significant degree. system capable of storing and manipulating spatial data; a set of computer hardware and software for endemic species—Plants or animals that occur analyzing and displaying spatially referenced naturally in a certain region and whose distribution features (such as points, lines and polygons) with is relatively limited to a particular locality. nongeographic attributes such as species and age. Glossary 53 GIS—See geographic information system. issue—Any unsettled matter that requires a management decision; for example, a Service initiative, goal—Descriptive, open-ended, and often broad opportunity, resource management problem, a statement of desired future conditions that conveys threat to the resources of the unit, conflict in uses, a purpose but does not define measurable units (“The public concern, or the presence of an undesirable Fish and Wildlife Service Manual,” 620 FW 1.5). resource condition (“The Fish and Wildlife Service grassland tract—A contiguous area of grassland Manual,” 602
Recommended publications
  • Appendix, Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Arrowwood
    Glossary accessible—Pertaining to physical access to areas canopy—A layer of foliage, generally the uppermost and activities for people of different abilities, layer, in a vegetative stand; midlevel or understory especially those with physical impairments. vegetation in multilayered stands. Canopy closure (also canopy cover) is an estimate of the amount of adaptive resource management—The rigorous overhead vegetative cover. application of management, research, and monitoring to gain information and experience CCC—See Civilian Conservation Corps. necessary to assess and modify management activities; a process that uses feedback from CCP—See comprehensive conservation plan. research, monitoring, and evaluation of management CFR—See Code of Federal Regulations. actions to support or modify objectives and strategies at all planning levels; a process in which cfs—Cubic feet per second. policy decisions are implemented within a framework of scientifically driven experiments to Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC)—Peacetime test predictions and assumptions inherent in civilian “army” established by President Franklin management plan. Analysis of results helps managers D. Roosevelt to perform conservation activities determine whether current management should from 1933–42. Activities included erosion control; continue as is or whether it should be modified to firefighting; tree planting; habitat protection; achieve desired conditions. stream improvement; and building of fire towers, roads, recreation facilities, and drainage systems. Administration Act—National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)—The codification of the general and permanent rules published in the AGNPS—Agricultural nonpoint source (model). Federal Register by the executive departments and alternative agencies of the federal government. Each volume of —A reasonable way to solve an identified the CFR is updated once each calendar year.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Political Contributions
    Johnson & Johnson Political Contributions January 1 - December 31, 2014 Campaign/Payee Name Candidate Amount Account Office ALABAMA Committe to Elect Greg Reed Sen. Gregory Reed (R) $500.00 Corporate State Senate Committee to Elect April Weaver Rep. April Weaver (R) $250.00 J&J PAC State House Dial Campaign of AL Sen. Gerald Dial (R) $500.00 Corporate State Senate Friends of Mike Hubbard Rep. Mike Hubbard (R) $500.00 Corporate State House Jabo Waggoner of AL Sen. J. T. Waggoner (R) $500.00 Corporate State Senate Jim McClendon of AL Sen. Jim McClendon (R) $500.00 Corporate State House Jimmy Martin of AL Jimmy Martin (D) $250.00 Corporate State Senate Laura Hall of AL Rep. Laura Hall (D) $250.00 Corporate State House Mac McCutcheon of AL Rep. Mac McCutcheon (R) $500.00 Corporate State House Marsh for State Senate Sen. Del Marsh (R) $500.00 Corporate State Senate Paul Bussman of AL Sen. Paul Bussman (R) $500.00 Corporate State Senate Ron Johnson of AL Rep. Ronald G. Johnson (R) $250.00 Corporate State House ARKANSAS Asa for Governor Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R) $2,000.00 Corporate Governor Bill Gossage Campaign Rep. Bill Gossage (R) $500.00 Corporate State House Dan Douglas Campaign Rep. Dan M. Douglas (R) $400.00 Corporate State Senate David Meeks Camplain Rep. David Meeks (R) $400.00 Corporate State House Harold R. Copenhaver of AR Harold Copenhaver (D) $400.00 Corporate State House Jim Dotson Campaign Rep. Jim Dotson (R) $900.00 Corporate State House John Cooper for State Senate Sen. John R.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Meeting Notice
    15.5171.01000 September 2, 2014 REVISED MEETING NOTICE Representative Chet Pollert, Chairman, has called a meeting of the BUDGET SECTION. Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 Time: 9:30 a.m. Place: Senate Chamber, State Capitol, Bismarck Agenda: Presentations by representatives of the Office of Management and Budget regarding the status of the general fund, revised 2013-15 biennium and preliminary 2015-17 biennium revenue forecasts, key economic indicators, irregularities in the fiscal practices of the state, employees receiving bonuses above the 25 percent limitation, tobacco settlement proceeds, and federal grant applications; by state agency representatives regarding Emergency Commission requests; by representatives of the Game and Fish Department on approval of land purchases; by representatives of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation on prison population, inmate admissions, and the number of inmates not admitted; by representatives of the Department of Human Services regarding transfers between line items or subdivisions; by representatives of the State Fire Marshal on income and expenditures of fire departments and reserve fund balances; by representatives of the Information Technology Department regarding the department's annual report; by the Legislative Council staff of the 2014 North Dakota Finance Facts, on the status of the state's federal funds receipts on block grant hearings required during the 2015 legislative session, and a resolution draft authorizing the Budget Section to hold any required legislative block
    [Show full text]
  • MCF Contribution Report July 1
    MCF CONTRIBUTIONS JULY 1 - DECEMBER 31, 2018 Name State Candidate Amount Party Total U.S. Senate Sinema For Arizona AZ Sen. Kyrsten Sinema $2,500 DEM ARIZONA TOTAL $2,500 U.S. House Jim Costa For Congress CA Rep. Jim Costa $1,000 DEM CALIFORNIA TOTAL $1,000 U.S. House Al Lawson For Congress FL Rep. Al Lawson $2,000 DEM FLORIDA TOTAL $2,000 U.S. Senate Leadership Joni For Iowa IA Sen. Joni Ernst $2,500 REP U.S. House Loebsack For Congress IA Rep. Dave Loebsack $2,500 DEM Young For Iowa, Inc. IA David Young $1,500 REP Young For Iowa, Inc. IA David Young $2,500 REP Governor Kim Reynolds for Iowa IA Gov. Kim Reynolds $7,500 REP Agriculture Secretary Mike Naig for Iowa Agriculture IA Sec. Mike Naig $5,000 REP Mike Naig for Iowa Agriculture IA Sec. Mike Naig $5,000 REP State Senate Schneider for State Senate IA Sen. Charles Schneider $2,500 REP Citizens to Elect Bill Dotzler IA Sen. Bill Dotzler $1,000 DEM Kevin Kinney for State Senate IA Sen. Kevin Kinney $1,000 DEM Dan Zumbach for Senate IA Sen. Dan Zumbach $2,000 REP Kraayenbrink for Iowa Senate IA Sen. Tim Kraayenbrink $500 REP Tom Shipley for Iowa IA Sen. Tom Shipley $750 REP Amanda Ragan for Iowa Senate IA Sen. Amanda Ragan $750 DEM Friends of Whitver IA Sen. Jack Whitver $3,500 REP Sweeney for Senate IA Sen. Annette Sweeney $1,000 REP Kapucian for State Senate IA Sen. Tim Kapucian $750 REP Friends for Zach Nunn IA Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • VCSU Donor Edition Fiscal Year 2014-2015
    VCSU Donor Edition Fiscal Year 2014-2015 alumni.vcsu.edu 1.800.532.8641 x37203 Tisa Mason VCSU President Too often we underestimate the power of a touch, a smile, a celebrating 125 years of making a difference – yesterday, today, kind word, a listening ear, an honest compliment, or the smallest and tomorrow. And at the center of it all is you – our donors. act of caring, all of which have the potential to turn a life around. Access. The college choice journey begins with “fit,” Leo Buscalia affordability, and being an institution of quality. Your contributions I love this quote because it captures the essence of Valley to the VCSU foundation funded a new marketing campaign and City State University – a University centered on creating made college affordable through scholarships. The results: transformational experiences for our students. Those A record scholarship allocation – more than $1 million from experiences begin with access followed by effort which then the VCSU Foundation was awarded to students for the 2014- leads to transformation. It is a formula resulting in a University 2015 academic year; An enrollment record of 1,422 experiences. Thank you for enabling Dakota, Sarah Baertsch Lutz, are both students, surpassing the previous VCSU to: VCSU alumni. Making a difference and high of 1,384 students in 2011; and Offer more than 80 undergraduate being a difference maker – that’s you. Ranked #1 Public Regional College programs; Your impact: in Midwest by US News and named Engage students through internships, “When I first stepped onto the VCSU a US News Best College for the 18th scientific fieldwork and research, study campus as a part of the Learning to Live consecutive year.
    [Show full text]
  • Burgum V. Jaeger, Et
    20200298 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT NOVEMBER 24, 2020 Corrected Opinion Filed 01/25/2021 by Clerk of Supreme Court STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2020 ND 251 Doug Burgum, in his capacity as North Dakota’s Governor, Petitioner v. Alvin Jaeger, in his capacity as North Dakota’s Secretary of State; the North Dakota Legislative Assembly, Chet Pollert, Chairman of Legislative Management; and the District 8 Republican Committee, Loren DeWitz, District Chairperson, Respondents and Democratic Non-Partisan League District 8 House of Representatives Candidate Kathrin Volochenko, Intervenor No. 20200298 Petition for Writ of Mandamus. LEGAL STATUS DECLARED, RELIEF DENIED. Opinion of the Court by Crothers, Justice. Robert J. Pathroff (argued) and Megan J. Gordon and Nick M. Surma (on brief), Bismarck, ND, for petitioner. Wayne K. Stenehjem, Attorney General (argued), and David R. Phillips (on brief), Bismarck, ND, for respondents Alvin Jaeger, in his capacity as North Dakota’s Secretary of State and the North Dakota Legislative Assembly, Chet Pollert, Chairman of Legislative Management. John M. Olson, Bismarck, ND, for respondent District 8 Republican Committee, Loren DeWitz, District Chairperson. David C. Thompson (argued), Grand Forks, ND, and Duane A. Lillehaug (on brief), Fargo, ND, for intervenor Democratic Non-Partisan League (DEM-NPL) District 8 House of Representative Candidate Kathrin Volochenko. Tyler Yeargain (on brief), New Haven, CT, amicus curiae. Jonathan T. Garaas (on brief), Fargo, ND, amicus curiae. 2 Filed by Clerk of Supreme Court 01/25/2021 Burgum v. Jaeger No. 20200298 Crothers, Justice. [¶1] Governor Doug Burgum petitions this Court to exercise our original jurisdiction to issue declarations and a writ of mandamus concerning who appoints the replacement after the pre-election death of a candidate for an office in the Legislative Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Local 49 Political Endorsements 2020
    LOCAL 49 POLITICAL ENDORSEMENTS 2020 MINNESOTA US SENATE Chuck Wiger (43) DFL Leon Lillie (43B) DFL Ron Latz (46) DFL Mike Howard (50A) DFL Tina Smith US Senator DFL Melisa Franzen (49) DFL Andrew Carlson (50B) DFL US CONGRESS Melissa Wiklund (50) DFL Tou Xiong (53A) DFL Matt Klein (52) DFL Keith Franke (54A) GOP Dan Feehan MN 1st DFL Susan Kent (53) DFL Tony Jurgens (54B) GOP Angie Craig MN 2nd DFL Karla Bigham (54) DFL Brad Tabke (55A) DFL Tom Emmer MN 6th GOP Eric Pratt (55) GOP Rena Moran (65A) DFL Collin Peterson MN 7th DFL Dan Hall (56) GOP Pete Stauber MN 8th GOP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Zack Duckworth (58) GOP Debbie Goettel Hennepin STATE SENATORS Kari Dziedzic (60) DFL Jeff Lunde Hennepin Tom Bakk (3) DFL STATE REPRESENTATIVES Dario Anselmo Hennepin Justin Eichorn (5) GOP Rob Ecklund (3A) DFL Kevin Anderson Hennepin David Tomassoni (6) DFL Joe Abeyta (5B) DFL Randy Maluchnik Carver Donna Bergstrom (7) GOP Local 49 Member Eric Erkkila St. Louis Bill Ingebrigtsen (8) GOP Dave Lislegard (6B) DFL John LeTourneau Anoka Paul Gazelka (9) GOP Nathan Nelson (11B) GOP CITY COUNCIL Jason Rarick (11) GOP Lisa Demuth (13A) GOP Paul Anspach Clarkfield Andrew Mathews (15) GOP Dan Wolgamott (14B) DFL Local 49 Member Scott Newman (18) GOP Paul Torkelson (16B) GOP Taylor Vaillancourt Lakeland Nick Frentz (19) DFL Dean Urdahl (18A) GOP Local 49 Member Jon Olson (20) DFL Rod Hamilton (22B) GOP Justin Olsen Cottage Grove Mike Goggin (21) GOP Liz Boldon (25B) DFL Mike Holden International Falls Julie Rosen (23) GOP Jeanne Poppe (27B) DFL Local 49 Member
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut
    This list is a comprehensive list of state legislators who are members of ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council). There are 1192 Republicans, 61 Democrats, 11 Non-Partisans (NE) members. There have been 45 members who have left ALEC in the last month; 11 Republicans, 32 Democrats, 2 Non-Partisans (NE) (Corporate Campaign). There have been 108 ALEC Legislators who have either lost or given up their seats. These are the people who are carrying out the extreme right -wing agenda in the states. They go to all expense paid ALEC meetings where they get treated to lavish accommodations, meals and entertainment for the small price of destroying our democracy. They target minorities, workers, women and democratically elected city and school board members. They push privatization as the answer when it has been proven that it is less efficient and more costly. The Kochs were funding the reintroduction of segregation into a school district in NC. Alabama Louisiana Ohio Alaska Maine Oklahoma Arizona Maryland Oregon Arkansas Massachusetts Pennsylvania California Michigan Rhode_Island Colorado Minnesota South_Carolina Connecticut Mississippi South_Dakota Delaware Missouri Tennessee Florida Montana Texas Georgia Nebraska Utah Hawaii Nevada Vermont Idaho New_Hampshire Virginia Illinois New_Jersey Washington Indiana New_Mexico West_Virginia Iowa New_York Wisconsin Kansas North_Carolina Wyoming Kentucky North_Dakota Alabama ALEC Legislators Rep. Karen Fann (R-1) Pres.P.Tem.S.Tenney Allen (R-5) House of Representatives Rep. Eddie Farnsworth (R-22) Rep. Richard Miranda (D-13) Rep. Jim Carns (R-48) Rep. John Fillmore (R-23) Former ALEC Legislators Rep. Victor Gaston (R-100) Rep. Thomas Forese (R-21) Sen. Russell Pearce Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 FPA-ND Legislative Scorecard
    2021 NORTH DAKOTA LEGISLATIVE REPORT CARD 67th LEGISLATIVE SESSION ABOUT THE SCORECARD We are pleased to share this scorecard for the 2021 North Dakota state legislative session. This is a snapshot of how lawmakers voted on key social and moral legislation related to life, education, family, religious freedom, and similar issues. Guided by our mission of building a state where God is honored, religious freedom flourishes, families thrive, and life is cherished, the scorecard focuses on seven bills. This scorecard is not an endorsement of any candidate or political party. It does not measure any lawmakers’ integrity, commitment to their faith, work ethic, or rapport with Family Policy Alliance of North Dakota. It is only a report on how each lawmaker voted. Please continue to hold our legislators accountable for their voting records and please pray that they may always vote in ways that uphold your biblical values as they make important decisions for our state. Sincerely, Mark Jorritsma Executive Director, Family Policy Alliance of North Dakota HOW WE FIGURED THE GRADES A bill is typically passed by a simple majority in the Senate (24 votes out of 47 senators) and the House (48 votes out of 94 Representatives.) Lawmakers earned percentage grades ranging from 0% to 100%, based upon dividing the candidate’s number of good votes cast by the number of total bills he/she voted on. The higher the score, the better their ranking. Not all lawmakers voted on every bill; the number of absences on these key bills is also noted and we encourage you to review whether your legislator actually voted on these important bills.
    [Show full text]
  • Nextera Energy PAC 2018 Contributions to State Candidates
    NextEra Energy PAC 2018 Contributions to State Candidates Recipient 2018 Amount Chamber State Party Gretchen Whitmer for Governor $ 10,000 Governor MI D Thompson for Senate 2018$ 10,000 STATE SENATE OK R Friends of John Michael Montgomery 2018$ 8,000 STATE SENATE OK R Caldwell for State House$ 7,500 STATE HOUSE OK R Friends of Scott Fetgatter$ 7,500 STATE HOUSE OK R Ken Paxton Campaign$ 7,500 ATTORNEY GENERAL TX R Trey Caldwell for State House 2018$ 7,000 STATE HOUSE OK R Dana Murphy for Lt. Governor$ 5,000 LT. GOVERNOR OK R Friends of Charles McCall $ 5,000 STATE HOUSE OK R Friends of Larry Householder $ 5,000 STATE HOUSE OH R Friends of Todd Russ $ 5,000 STATE HOUSE OK R Stitt for Governor $ 5,000 GOVERNOR OK R Tony for Wisconsin $ 5,000 GOVERNOR WI D Tom Wolf for Governor $ 3,500 GOVERNOR PA D Charles Perry Campaign $ 3,000 STATE SENATE TX R Dawn Buckingham Campaign $ 3,000 STATE SENATE TX R Drew Darby Campaign $ 3,000 STATE HOUSE TX R Four Price Campaign $ 3,000 STATE HOUSE TX R Friends of Greg Babinec $ 3,000 STATE HOUSE OK R Kristi for Governor $ 3,000 GOVERNOR SD R Angela Paxton Campaign $ 2,500 STATE SENATE TX R Brian Birdwell Campaign $ 2,500 STATE SENATE TX R Citizens for Pat Grassley $ 2,500 STATE HOUSE IA R Dennis Bonnen Campaign $ 2,500 STATE HOUSE TX R Friends of James Leewright 2018 $ 2,500 STATE SENATE OK R Friends of John Zerwas $ 2,500 STATE HOUSE TX R Friends of Kim David $ 2,500 STATE SENATE OK R Friends of Stephanie Bice 2018 $ 2,500 STATE SENATE OK R Jacob Rosecrants for HD 46$ 2,500 STATE HOUSE OK D Ken King Campaign $ 2,500 STATE HOUSE TX R Parson for Missouri $ 2,500 GOVERNOR MO R Perryman in 2018 $ 2,500 STATE HOUSE OK D Phil King Campaign $ 2,500 STATE HOUSE TX R Robert Nichols Campaign $ 2,500 STATE SENATE TX R Texans for Kelly Hancock SPAC $ 2,500 STATE SENATE TX R William Casey Murdock 2018 $ 2,500 STATE HOUSE OK R Ana Maria Rodriguez Campaign $ 2,000 STATE HOUSE FL R Ardian Zika Campaign$ 2,000 STATE HOUSE FL R Brett Hage Campaign$ 2,000 STATE HOUSE FL R Bryan Hill for House 2018 $ 2,000 STATE HOUSE OK R Charles Clemons Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Communication and Report FY15
    CLIENT CODE 123 Client Code 220 NORTH DAKOTA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Governance Communication Including the Report on Internal Control, Compliance, and Other Matters For the Year Ended June 30, 2015 ROBERT R. PETERSON STATE AUDITOR Dakota State Auditor CLIENT CODE 123 CLIENT CODE 475 LEGISLATIVE AUDIT AND FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS Senator Jerry Klein – Chairman Representative Chet Pollert – Vice Chairman Representatives Patrick R. Hatlestad Jerry Kelsh Keith Kempenich Lawrence R. Klemin Gary Kreidt Andrew Maragos Bob Martinson Corey Mock Mike Nathe Marvin E. Nelson Robert J. Skarphol Senators Judy Lee David O’Connell Table of Contents Transmittal Letter 1 Executive Summary 2 Responses to the LAFRC Audit Questions 2 LAFRC Audit Communications 3 Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 5 Findings, Recommendations, and University System Responses 7 Prior Recommendations Not Implemented and University System Responses 8 Governance Communication 13 Audit Adjustments 16 Passed Audit Adjustments 16 Management Letter 17 STATE AUDITOR Phone (701)239-7250 ROBERT R. PETERSON Fax (701)239-7251 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR FARGO BRANCH OFFICE 1655 43rd STREET SOUTH, SUITE 203 FARGO, NORTH DAKOTA 58103 Transmittal Letter December 2, 2015 Honorable Jack Dalrymple, Governor Members of the North Dakota Legislative Assembly State Board of Higher Education I am pleased to submit our report on internal control and compliance for the North Dakota University System. This report relates to the audit of the North Dakota University System’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of The
    NORTH DAKOTA LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Minutes of the BUDGET COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES Wednesday, December 14, 2005 Roughrider Room, State Capitol Bismarck, North Dakota Senator Dick Dever, Chairman, called the meeting b. Access to and utilization of current to order at 9:00 a.m. technology. Members present: Senators Dick Dever, Tom 2. Research for new insights and innovative Fischer, Aaron Krauter, Judy Lee, John M. Warner; solutions to health problems: Representatives Jeff Delzer, William R. Devlin, James a. Capacity for epidemiological, policy, and Kerzman, Gary Kreidt, Ralph Metcalf, Jon O. Nelson, service research. Chet Pollert, Todd Porter, Louise Potter, Clara Sue b. Fostering innovation. Price, Ken Svedjan, Gerald Uglem, Alon C. Wieland c. Linkage with institutions of higher Members absent: Senators Richard L. Brown, learning and research. Russell T. Thane; Representatives Lee Kaldor, 3. Develop policies and plans that support Vonnie Pietsch, Sally M. Sandvig individual and community health efforts: Others present: Merle Boucher, State a. Community health improvement process. Representative, Rolette b. Public health policy development. See attached appendix for additional persons c. Strategic planning and alignment with the present. community health improvement process. 4. Evaluate effectiveness, accessibility, and PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT STUDY quality of personal and population-based Ms. Kelly Nagel, local public health liaison, State health services: Department of Health, presented information on the a. Evaluation of population-based services. status of the department's assessment of the state's b. Evaluation of local public health systems. public health system. Ms. Nagel said in 2003 the 5. Mobilize community partnerships to identify department began the process of assessing public and solve health problems: health performance across the state in an effort to a.
    [Show full text]