Immersing Architecture: the Futures of Undersea Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Immersing Architecture: the Futures of Undersea Development Immersing Architecture: The Futures of Undersea Development Chad Henderson May 2009 Submitted towards the fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Architecture Degree School of Architecture University of Hawaii Doctorate Project Committee David Rockwood, Chairperson Jim Dator John Wiltshire TABLE OF CONTENTS Prologue .................................................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 7 2 Develop Underwater? ....................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Climate Change ..................................................................................................... 10 2.2 The Splendor of Submergence .............................................................................. 12 2.3 The Human Experience ......................................................................................... 13 3 Habitats Underwater ...................................................................................................... 16 3.1 The Beginning ....................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Early Tests ............................................................................................................. 19 4 Current Endeavors .......................................................................................................... 22 4.1 Aquarius ................................................................................................................ 23 4.2 Biosub ................................................................................................................... 24 4.3 Red Sea Star .......................................................................................................... 25 4.4 Ithaa ...................................................................................................................... 28 4.5 Huvafen Fushi ....................................................................................................... 30 4.6 Jules’ Undersea Lodge ........................................................................................... 31 5 Immersed in Opportunity ............................................................................................... 34 5.1 Poseidon ............................................................................................................... 35 5.2 Hydropolis ............................................................................................................. 37 II . Habitat design ................................................................................................................... 40 1 Habitat Programming ...................................................................................................... 41 2 An Undersea Landscape .................................................................................................. 43 2.1 Undersea structures and Urban Planning ............................................................. 44 2.1.1 Ecology ............................................................................................................. 44 2.2 Connections .......................................................................................................... 46 3 Structure ......................................................................................................................... 47 3.1.2 Foundations on the Sea Floor........................................................................... 48 3.1.3 Sealing the Environment .................................................................................. 50 4 Materials ......................................................................................................................... 52 4.1 Steel ...................................................................................................................... 53 4.2 Concrete ................................................................................................................ 54 4.2.4 Ferrocement ..................................................................................................... 55 4.2.5 Fiber Reinforced Concrete ................................................................................ 57 2 4.2.6 Applied Coatings ............................................................................................... 59 4.3 Composites ........................................................................................................... 60 4.4 Acrylic .................................................................................................................... 61 5 Systems ........................................................................................................................... 63 5.1 Life Safety Systems ............................................................................................... 64 5.2 Atmospheric Comfort Undersea ........................................................................... 65 5.3 Lighting Undersea ................................................................................................. 66 6 Ancillary Technologies .................................................................................................... 68 6.1 Electricity .............................................................................................................. 69 6.1.7 Wind ................................................................................................................. 69 6.1.8 Wave Energy..................................................................................................... 70 6.1.9 Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion .................................................................. 72 6.1.10 Closed Cycle ................................................................................................. 72 6.1.11 Open Cycle ................................................................................................... 73 6.1.12 Hybrid Cycle ................................................................................................. 73 6.1.13 Locations for OTEC energy ........................................................................... 74 6.1.14 Problems with OTEC .................................................................................... 74 6.2 Hydrogen .............................................................................................................. 75 7 Fathoming Delight ........................................................................................................... 78 III Alternative Future ............................................................................................................. 84 1 The “Futures Image” ....................................................................................................... 85 1.1 The year 2060: ...................................................................................................... 86 2 The Design Process ......................................................................................................... 92 2.1 Existing Buildings .................................................................................................. 93 2.2 The Levee .............................................................................................................. 95 2.3 The Lagoon ........................................................................................................... 97 3 The Proposal ................................................................................................................... 99 3.1 The Form ............................................................................................................. 100 3.2 Interior Spaces .................................................................................................... 105 3.3 The Complex ....................................................................................................... 112 4 Final Thoughts ............................................................................................................... 118 5 Bibliography .................................................................................................................. 120 6 Image Credits ................................................................................................................ 123 3 PROLOGUE Throughout time, mankind has fulfilled an instinctual obligation to explore the environment in which he finds himself. Scaling mountains, exploring caves, and surveying valleys appear to be a visceral act of the human condition. But until recent history, the ocean realm was precluded from these investigations. The thick medium caused eyes to burn and respiration to cease. The rippled surface was an impenetrable barrier to the mysteries below, passable only by clumsily splashing across the surface. Because of this, folklore engulfed imaginations and told of monsters that inhabit the curious depths beyond our sight. Prologue 4 “With the rise of civilization, the search for new wealth and the elevation of national pride drove explorers to risk their lives and benefactors to empty their coffers in the quest for discovery. All of these factors — survival, inspiration, wealth, and national pride — provide the fundamental justification
Recommended publications
  • New and Different to Come Your Way with Regard to Our Upcoming 2019 Sea Technology Buyers Guide/Directory
    WATCH FOR SOMETHING NEW AND DIFFERENT TO COME YOUR WAY WITH REGARD TO OUR UPCOMING 2019 SEA TECHNOLOGY BUYERS GUIDE/DIRECTORY PROCEED TO MAGAZINE from Surface to Seabed Position / Heading Weather Monitoring Electromagnetic / Smart™ Depth Sensor Ultrasonic Speed Acoustic Communications (ACOMMs) ADCP / DVL Acoustic Communications (ACOMMs) Altimeter Side Scan Forward-looking Sonar Multibeam Sonar Collecting and connecting from surface to seafloor, AIRMAR and MSI push the boundaries of ultrasonic technology to deliver multi-sensor and array solutions that ensure the highest level of data integrity. Consult with our engineering teams to source or design the perfect combination of sensors to achieve your mission’s goals. AIRMAR.COM MSITRANSDUCERS.COM 2 ST | June 2018 www.sea-technology.com High Performance Cable Handling Systems RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS • MILITARY • GOVERNMENT AGENCIES # Custom and Standard Configurations # Mil-Spec, ABS, DNV and 46CFR Certifications # Easy to Operate and Maintain InterOcean Systems has been supplying specialized winches and cable handling systems for over 45 years. Let our experienced application engineers assist you in reviewing and developing performance specifications for your specialized application. Contact us to discuss your oceanographic winch and cable handling system needs! InterOcean Systems, LLC Tel. (858) 565-8400 • Fax (858) 268-9695 www.interoceansystems.com An affiliate of Delmar Systems, Inc. ANY APPLICATION • ANY LOAD • RUGGED AND RELIABLE www.sea-technology.com June 2018 | ST 3 The SeaBat T-series Modular, compact multibeam sonar family that grows with your business The unique modular design concept of the SeaBat T-series allows you to configure exactly the sonar survey system for the job at hand.
    [Show full text]
  • "Aquarius" Undersea Habitat As an Analog for Long- Duration Space Flight
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20110011365 2019-08-30T15:38:42+00:00Z Source of Acquisiti on NASA Jolmson Space Center The NEEMO Project: A Report on how NASA Utilizes the "Aquarius" Undersea Habitat as an Analog for Long- Duration Space Flight. Bill ToddlUnited Space Alliance Marc Reagan/NASA NEEMO Project Leads Spaceflight Training, NASAJJSC October, 2003 Abstract NEEMO is the NASA Extreme Environment Mission Operations, a cooperative project between NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). NEEMO was created and is managed by the Mission Operations Directorate at the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas. On the NOAA side, the National Undersea Research Center (NURC) in Key Largo, FL, with the help of the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, manages and operates the Aquarius Program. NEEMO was developed by astronaut training specialists to utilize an undersea research habitat as a multi-objective mission analog for long-duration space flight. Each mission was designed to expose astronauts to extreme environments for training purposes and to research crew behavior, habitability, and space analog life sciences. All of this was done much in the model of a space mission utilizing specific crew procedures, mission rules and timelines. Objectives of the missions were very diverse and contained many of the typical space mission type activities such as EV As (also known as extra vehicular activities), in-habitat science and research, and educational, public outreach, and media events. Five missions, dubbed NEEMO 1-5, were conducted between October 2001 and July 2003, the longest of which (NEEMO 5) lasted 14 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquarius Fact Sheet
    Fact Sheet: 2019 Designer: Perry Submarine Builders (Florida) Construction: Victoria Machine Works (Texas); start: 1986 | complete: 1987 Estimated construction cost: $5.5M Operational Timeline: St. Croix Deployment: Deployment in Salt River Canyon, St. Croix: 1987 Owner: NOAA Operator: Farleigh Dickenson University Interim Period: Recovered: 1990 by the University of North Carolina Wilmington Refurbished: 1990-1993 at North Carolina State Ports, Wilmington, NC Owner: NOAA Operator: University of North Carolina Wilmington Florida Keys Deployment: Initial deployment on Conch Reef, Florida Keys: 1993 (baseplate deployed 1992) Recovered for refurbishment: 1996-1998 - Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, Ft. Pierce, FL Redeployment on Conch Reef, Florida Keys: 1998 – present Owner: NOAA: 1986-2014; Florida International University: 2014 – present Operator: FDU: 1987-1989; UNCW: 1990-2012; Florida International University: 2013 - present Aquarius Siting: Conch Reef, Florida Keys (Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary): Distance From Islamorada shore base: 15.4 km (8.5 nm) Distance offshore: 9 km (5.4 nm) Hatch depth/storage depth: 14 m (46 fsw) 35 psi Depth of bottom directly below Aquarius: 18 m (60 fsw) (updated: 09.15.19) Habitat Specifications: Aquarius weight: 82-ton double-lock pressure vessel Baseplate weight: 120 tons Dimensions: 14-meters long by 3-meters in diameter (46 ft x 10 ft) Crew: 4 scientists and 2 technicians Amenities: kitchen facilities that include a microwave, instant hot water dispenser, refrigerator, sink, dining
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Extreme Environment Mission Operations Project (NEEMO) 15
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Extreme Environment Mission Operations Project (NEEMO) 15 facts XV NASA possible t-shirt colors Space exploration presents many unique aquanauts, live in the world’s only undersea challenges to humans. In order to prepare laboratory, the Aquarius, located 3.5 miles astronauts for these extreme environments off the coast of Key Largo, Fla. in space, NASA engineers and scientists use comparable environments on Earth. Most underwater activities are One of the most extreme environments is accomplished by traditional scuba diving, the ocean. Not only is the ocean a harsh but divers are limited to specific amounts of and unpredictable environment, but it has time because of the risk of decompression many parallels to the challenges of living sickness (often called the “bends”). Based and working in space – particularly in on the depth and the amount of time spent destinations with little or no gravity, such as underwater, inert gases such as nitrogen asteroids. will build up in the human body. If a diver ascends out of the water too quickly, the The NASA Extreme Environment Mission gases that were absorbed can create Operations project, known as NEEMO, bubbles within the diver’s body as the sends groups of astronauts, engineers, surrounding pressure reduces. doctors and professional divers to live in an underwater habitat for up to three weeks A technique known as saturation diving at a time. These crew members, called allows people to live and work underwater for days or weeks at a time. After twenty four hours Station, which has served as the living quarters for at any underwater depth, the human body becomes Expedition crew members.
    [Show full text]
  • Dubai 2020: Dreamscapes, Mega Malls and Spaces of Post-Modernity
    Dubai 2020: Dreamscapes, Mega Malls and Spaces of Post-Modernity Dubai’s hosting of the 2020 Expo further authenticates its status as an example of an emerging Arab city that displays modernity through sequences of fragmented urban- scapes, and introvert spaces. The 2020 Expo is expected to reinforce the image of Dubai as a city of hybrid architectures and new forms of urbanism, marked by technologically advanced infrastructural systems. This paper revisits Dubai’s spaces of the spectacle such as the Burj Khalifa and themed mega malls, to highlight the power of these spaces of repre- sentation in shaping Dubai’s image and identity. INTRODUCTION MOHAMED EL AMROUSI Initially, a port city with an Indo-Persian mercantile community, Dubai’s devel- Abu Dhabi University opment along the Creek or Khor Dubai shaped a unique form of city that is con- stantly reinventing itself. Its historic adobe courtyard houses, with traditional PAOLO CARATELLI wind towers-barjeel sprawling along the Dubai Creek have been fully restored Abu Dhabi University to become heritage houses and museums, while their essential architectural vocabulary has been dismembered and re-membered as a simulacra in high-end SADEKA SHAKOUR resorts such as Madinat Jumeirah, the Miraj Hotel and Bab Al-Shams. Dubai’s Abu Dhabi University interest to make headlines of the international media fostered major investment in an endless vocabulary of forms and fragments to create architectural specta- cles. Contemporary Dubai is experienced through symbolic imprints of multiple policies framed within an urban context to project an image of a city offers luxu- rious dreamscapes, assembled in discontinued urban centers.
    [Show full text]
  • KSB Solutions Burj Khalifa Development and the Dubai Mall
    Pumps n Valves n Systems KSB Solutions Industry Water Waste Water Energy Building Services Mining Burj Khalifa Development and The Dubai Mall District Cooling Burj Khalifa Development Area Heated growth, keeping cool Emaar Properties PJSC is one of the With average temperatures above 30 °C for over half the year - and in the mid 40s world’s largest real estate companies in summer - the cooling of the world’s tallest building “Burj Khalifa” as well as and is rapidly evolving to become a “The Dubai Mall” requires reliable and high quality solutions. global provider of premier life-styles. As one of the world’s leading suppliers of pumps, valves and systems for water It not only builds homes, but also management, KSB represented locally by KSB Middle East FZE, has been a highly develops value-added, master-planned competent and effective partner to meet the challenge. communities. Since the company’s inception in 1997, Emaar has been keeping up with Dubai’s rapid growth. Efficient solutions for extreme conditions The DCP-01 plant is designed to produce cooling water as plant reliably supplies cooling water – up to 10,000 tons an well as ice, the latter being made during off-peak hours hour – to the Burj Development Area. Further our rugged (midnight to early morning). The ice is then used as low pumps ensure the chilled water is distributed to all of the temperature thermal storage during peak hours (after noon 162 habitable floors within the Burj Khalifa. Our ductile cast during summer months). Equipped with KSB’s durable and iron pumps were selected considering the extremely high suc- energy-efficient Omega water transfer pumps, the DCP–01 tion and operating pressure requirements of the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Why an Underwater Habitat? Underwater Habitats Are Useful Because They Provide a Permanent Working Area for Aquanauts (Divers) W
    [Type a quote from the document or the summary of an interesting point. You can position the text box anywhere in the document. Use the Drawing Tools tab to change the formatting of the pull quote text box.] Abstract What are the different types of Underwater Habitat and how do they differ? What is the Technology used in Underwater Habitats? Underwater habitats are useful study environments for researchers including marine biologists, There are three main types of underwater habitat that are distinguished from one psychologists studying the effects of prolonged periods of isolation in extreme environments, another by how they deal with water and air pressure. The first type, open To access an underwater lab, divers sometimes swim or take submersibles and physiologists studying how life adapts to different pressures. The technologies used and pressure, has an air pressure inside that is equal to the water pressure outside. which then dock with the facility. Shallow habitats may even be accessed by data gleaned from these studies have applications in space research, and in the future Decompression is required for divers returning to the surface from this type of climbing a ladder or taking an elevator. Deep-sea labs have been taken by crane underwater habitats can be used for industrial activity such as mining the deep sea, and facility, but they are able to go in and out of the laboratory on diving missions with from a boat and placed in the sea. In those labs deep underwater, it becomes expansion of these technologies extends humanity’s reach across earth’s biosphere into its relative ease, due to the fact that they don’t need to acclimate to differing dangerous to breathe in the same air as on the surface because the nitrogen oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Engineering2
    Aerospace Engineering BY TEAM 39402A Introduction to Aerospace Engineering For our career path, we chose aerospace engineer. Aerospace engineering consists of aircraft, spacecraft and satellite design and construction. Aerospace engineers also test prototypes. A prototype is a new invention that needs to be tested. We chose this career because we love space and adventure! NASA The main United States aerospace engineering company is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, also known as NASA. This agency was created in 1958. NASA was the first space agency to get a human on the moon. Sent by NASA, Neil Armstrong, an astronaut and aeronautical engineer, was the first human to step on the moon in 1969. Now NASA is working on getting people back to the moon and going to Mars. Aircraft Aerospace engineering includes aircraft. There is one main difference between spacecraft and aircraft. Spacecraft are meant to break earth’s gravitational pull, where as aircraft are meant to stay in earth’s gravity. Aircraft also carry cargo and humans. The first airplane was created on December 17, 1903 by the Wright Brothers. Spacecraft Spacecraft are another part of aerospace engineering. There have been many space shuttles launched into orbit. Throughout time, rockets and space shuttles have evolved. Aerospace engineers have made rockets and shuttles much safer. Rockets and shuttles not only transport humans, but also cargo and rovers. Satellites The first satellite was developed by Russia and was named Sputnik1on October 4, 1957. Sputnik travelled at a speed of 18,000 miles per hour. It went around earth every 93 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Last of the Earth's Frontiers': Sealab, the Aquanaut, and the US
    ‘The Last of the earth’s frontiers’: Sealab, the Aquanaut, and the US Navy’s battle against the sub-marine Rachael Squire Department of Geography Royal Holloway, University of London Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD, University of London, 2017 Declaration of Authorship I, Rachael Squire, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ___Rachael Squire_______ Date: __________9.5.17________ 2 Contents Declaration…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 List of figures……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 List of abbreviations…………………………………………………………………………………………… 12 Preface: Charting a course: From the Bay of Gibraltar to La Jolla Submarine Canyon……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 The Sealab Prayer………………………………………………………………………………………………. 18 Chapter 1: Introducing Sealab …………………………………………………………………………… 19 1.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….... 20 1.1 Empirical and conceptual opportunities ……………………....................... 24 1.2 Thesis overview………………………………………………………………………………. 30 1.3 People and projects: a glossary of the key actors in Sealab……………… 33 Chapter 2: Geography in and on the sea: towards an elemental geopolitics of the sub-marine …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 39 2.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………. 40 2.1 The sea in geography……………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • DUBAI Cushman & Wakefield Global Cities Retail Guide
    DUBAI Cushman & Wakefield Global Cities Retail Guide Cushman & Wakefield | Dubai | 2019 0 Dubai has developed into the retail hub of the Middle East and is the most sophisticated retail market in the region. The proliferation of retail development over the last ten years has led to Dubai having one of the highest retail to population densities in the world. It finished ahead of New York and London for shopping in TripAdvisor’s recently published second annual Cities Survey. Perhaps the best known of Dubai’s plentiful selection of retail malls is The Dubai Mall which is located in the heart of the prestigious Downtown Dubai and is one of the world’s most-visited retail and entertainment destination, having welcomed more than 80 million visitors annually over the last five years. Dubai Mall provides over 1,350 retail stores and over 200 food and beverage outlets, together with leisure and entertainment attractions. Its most recent expansion in 2017 provides connectivity to the attractions and amenities in the neighbouring Burj Khalifa. Other high- profile retail malls that dominate the retail market include Mall of the Emirates and Dubai Festival City. International retail brands are predominantly operated under license by ‘retail partners’ who hold licenses for multiple brands in their portfolios. These include groups such as Al Shaya, Landmark and Majid Al Futtaim. Often these retail operators can also be mall developers in their own right. These companies are very powerful in the retail sector and can make the difference between a new mall development securing attractive brands or struggling to attract the right brands and potential failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Studies Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2015, Pp. 181-196 Futures, Fakes
    Island Studies Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2015, pp. 181-196 Futures, fakes and discourses of the gigantic and miniature in ‘The World’ islands, Dubai Pamila Gupta University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg, South Africa [email protected] ABSTRACT: This article takes the “island” as a key trope in tourism studies, exploring how ideas of culture and nature, as well as those of paradise (lost) are central to its interpretation for tourists and tourist industries alike. Increasingly, however, island tourism is blurring the line between geographies of land and water, continent and archipelago, and private and public property. The case of ‘The World’ islands mega project off the coast of Dubai (UAE) is used to chart the changing face and future of island tourism, exploring how spectacle, branding and discourses of the gigantic, miniature, and fake, alongside technological mediations on a large- scale, reflect the postmodern neoliberal world of tourism and the liquid times in which we live. Artificial island complexes such as this one function as cosmopolitan ‘non-places’ at the same time that they reflect a resurgence in (British) nascent nationalism and colonial nostalgia, all the whilst operating in a sea of ‘junkspace’. The shifting cartography of ‘the island’ is thus mapped out to suggest new forms of place-making and tourism’s evolving relationship to these floating islandscapes. Keywords : archipelago; culture; Dubai; island tourism; nature; ‘World Islands’ © 2015 – Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada Introduction A journey. A saga. A legend. The World is today’s great development epic. An engineering odyssey to create an island paradise of sea, sand and sky, a destination has arrived that allows investors to chart their own course and make the world their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Document (Pdf 2154
    White Paper Research Project T1803, Task 35 Overwater Whitepaper OVERWATER STRUCTURES: MARINE ISSUES by Barbara Nightingale Charles A. Simenstad Research Assistant Senior Fisheries Biologist School of Marine Affairs School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 University District Building 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 Washington State Department of Transportation Technical Monitor Patricia Lynch Regulatory and Compliance Program Manager, Environmental Affairs Prepared for Washington State Transportation Commission Department of Transportation and in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration May 2001 WHITE PAPER Overwater Structures: Marine Issues Submitted to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Washington Department of Ecology Washington Department of Transportation Prepared by Barbara Nightingale and Charles Simenstad University of Washington Wetland Ecosystem Team School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences May 9, 2001 Note: Some pages in this document have been purposefully skipped or blank pages inserted so that this document will copy correctly when duplexed. TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. WA-RD 508.1 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE Overwater Structures: Marine Issues May 2001 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Barbara Nightingale, Charles Simenstad 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. University District Building; 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Agreement T1803, Task 35 Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 12.
    [Show full text]