DOCSLIB.ORG

February 17, 2021 • Austin, Texas And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
February 17, 2021 • Austin, Texas And VOLUNTEER HANDBOOK February 17, 2021 • Austin, Texas and are proud sponsors of ORANGE & MAROON LEGISLATIVE DAY 2021 Thank you for volunteering today and for your continued support of these two great institutions. ORANGE AND MAROON LEGISLATIVE DAY THANK YOU The Texas Exes and The Association of Former Students thank the Texas Legislature and the Governor for the support provided for Texas A&M University and The University of Texas at Austin during the 86th Legislative Session. This support has made a profound difference not only to students but to the state of Texas by advancing excellence in teaching and research on both campuses. WHAT’S AT STAKE? State funding is a critical component for all Texas colleges and universities to maintain accessibility, affordability, and quality education for students and families. With Texas A&M and UT Austin having the largest student bodies in the state and the demand for a degree from these institutions remaining high, any budget reductions will have a negative impact on the institutions by affecting programs that have increased graduation rates, reduced time-to-degree, and contributed to the success and retention of students—especially those considered at-risk. WHY IS INVESTMENT IMPORTANT? FUTURE OF TEXAS Texas A&M and UT Austin are united in serving Texas by producing a highly educated workforce that will benefit generations of Texans. The state’s two flagship universities provide a world-class education to over 116,00 students, which includes 90,000+ undergraduates, 2,000+ student veterans and 25,000+ graduate and professional students. Last year, UT Austin and Texas A&M awarded more than 22,000 undergraduate degrees, almost 20 percent of all degrees awarded by Texas public institutions. A Texas A&M and UT Austin bachelor’s degree holder earns an average of $583,000 more over 20 years than an average high school graduate without a bachelor’s degree. ALUMNI There are more than 1,000,000 living Texas A&M former students and UT Austin alumni throughout the world. Tens of thousands contribute over $13 billion in total income every year as a part of the Texas workforce, the equivalent of creating almost 180,000 jobs. Both universities have the highest return on investment for all public universities in Texas. RESEARCH Research conducted at UT Austin and Texas A&M enhances quality of life for all Texans: fighting and treating diseases, devising solutions to global problems, addressing critically important social issues, and improving the human condition. Our students contribute to our research initiatives and gain practical skills that provide them with the real-world experience needed to succeed. Since the outbreak of COVID-19, the two universities have deployed significant resources to help the state monitor and fight this virus. These quick breakthroughs would not have been possible without long-term, sustained state investment in higher education research initiatives. JOINT LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES FOR TEXAS EXES AND THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS #1 Research at Texas A&M and UT Austin enhances the quality of life for Texans and stimulates the state’s economy. ASK: 1) We ask the legislature to enhance the funding rate of the Texas Research University Fund, providing stronger investment in the life-saving research aimed at solving challenges facing Texas. 2) We ask the legislature to maintain funding for the Governor’s University Research Initiative which supports UT Austin and Texas A&M’s efforts in recruiting distinguished researchers who provide innovative classroom instruction and conduct invaluable research. #2 State formula funding directly supports the core academic mission of Texas A&M and UT Austin: educating students and preparing them for careers in the workforce. Both universities also receive institutional enhancement funding to strengthen support for their students, faculty, and staff. ASK: 1) We ask the legislature to continue investing in Texas A&M and UT Austin by enhancing current (FY20-21) funding levels for the formulas to fully account for enrollment growth rates. 2) We ask the legislature to continue to fund each University’s Institutional Enhancement (IE) item. BACKGROUND #1 Support Texas Research HISTORY: In 2015, both the Texas Research University Fund (TRUF) and the Governor’s University Research Initiative (GURI) were created. The TRUF exists to encourage and support research initiatives at the state’s two flagship institutions. This fund has allowed Texas to compete with other national research universities. In 2016, the TRUF provided $1.18 M per $10 M in research expenditures at UT Austin and Texas A&M. The GURI allows for recruiting and retaining key faculty to teach and conduct critical research at UT Austin and Texas A&M. In 2019, the TRUF was appropriated $147.07 M, which represents a 17.5 percent increase over the previous biennium, and the GURI received $40 M in appropriations. WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW: A significant source of support for both UT Austin and Texas A&M comes from the Texas Research University Fund and the Governor’s University Research Initiative. Research at Texas A&M and UT Austin not only enhances the quality of life for Texans, but it stimulates the state’s economy. ASK: 1) We ask the legislature to enhance the funding rate of the Texas Research University Fund, providing stronger investment in the life-saving research aimed at solving challenges facing Texas. 2) We ask the legislature to maintain funding for the Governor’s University Research Initiative which supports UT Austin and Texas A&M’s efforts in recruiting distinguished researchers who provide innovative classroom instruction and conduct invaluable research. BACKGROUND #2 Support Robust Formula Funding and University Institutional Enhancement HISTORY: The legislature uses funding formulas to distribute available state appropriations to higher education institutions. They allocate a base level of funding primarily on enrollment and estimated average cost by program. The formula is calculated by the Higher Education Coordinating Board and its recommendations are presented to the Legislative Budget Board in June of even-numbered years. In 2011, higher education suffered substantial cuts to base funding levels that have not been restored as the state’s economy recovered. WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW: State formula funding directly supports the core academic mission of universities: educating students. Formula funding comprises a significant part of the state’s financial support for instruction and academic operations at UT Austin and Texas A&M University. It is important to recognize the critical role that higher education—and especially the state’s two flagship institutions—play in the economic success of Texas. Furthermore, stable and predictable state funding promotes efficiency and consistency for the universities, students, and their families. ASK: 1) We ask the legislature to continue investing in Texas A&M and UT Austin by enhancing current (FY20-21) funding levels for the formulas to fully account for enrollment growth rates. 2) We ask the legislature to continue to fund each University’s Institutional Enhancement (IE) item. UNITED AGAINST COVID UT Austin UT Austin researchers created the first 3-D atomic level map of the SARS-CoV-2 virus’ spike protein, which was a crucial piece in the development of a vaccine. UT Austin scientists have directly impacted the ability to develop and provide safe vaccines for millions of people in record time. utex.as/UT3Dmap UT Austin researchers have aided in the development of a process for treating critically ill patients by transfusing blood plasma from recovered patients. These processes are enabled by a UT Austin-developed sensitive and quantitative antibody test that allows providers to screen plasma from survivors to choose those with the highest levels of antibodies. The test has also led to a better understanding of the immune responses present in COVID-19 patients. utex.as/UTantibody UT Austin is working to repurpose existing drugs that have already been approved by the FDA to make them more effective and efficient in treating COVID-19. utex.as/UTrepurposing Texas A&M Texas A&M researchers, with support from the National Science Foundation, are seeking to develop a smart ventilation control system to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in public buildings. tx.ag/Ventilation Texas A&M researchers are developing a device that can be used to rapidly identify antibodies produced by human B cells that can neutralize infection by SARSCoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. tx.ag/Antibody A Texas A&M chemist was the first to I.D. the drug Remdesivir, which has been being used in Texas hospitals as the most effective treatment option against COVID-19. The drug has shown promise of speeding up the recovery of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. tx.ag/Remdesivir TALKING POINTS Educated Workforce Our state’s flagship institutions provide businesses the highly educated workforce needed for economic success in Texas. Both universities have state-of-the-art facilities to ensure a world-class learning environment for Texas students. Graduates from Texas A&M and UT Austin become educators, veterans, scientists, business owners, coaches, and leaders in Texas. With a combined alumni force of around one million UT Austin alumni and Texas A&M former students, graduates of both universities ensure that the state is a leader in innovation and a competitor in the global marketplace. An investment in UT Austin and Texas A&M is an investment in a sustainable, healthy, and productive economy. Research Both universities have made a positive impact as we face the COVID-19 pandemic through continued dedication to excellence in the areas of education, research, and public service. Research at these universities provides solutions to problems faced by society and allows students the opportunity to gain knowledge, skills and real-world experiences. Quick breakthroughs to fight back against the COVID-19 pandemic would not have been possible without prior long-term, sustained investment in higher education research initiatives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Texas Association of Freestanding Emergency Centers
    Statewide Health Care Costs, Select Committee: The Honorable Greg Bonnen MD, Chair The Honorable Senfronia Thompson, Vice Chair The Honorable Garnet Coleman The Honorable Philip Cortez The Honorable James B. Frank The Honorable Cody Harris The Honorable Cole Hefner The Honorable Stephanie Klick The Honorable Eddie Lucio III The Honorable Christina Morales The Honorable Tom Oliverson MD October 1, 2020 Honorable Members of the Statewide Health Care Costs Select Committee, On behalf of The Texas Association of Freestanding Emergency Centers (TAFEC), we would like to submit the following information for the interim charges related to the information on health care costs in Texas. TAFEC is a member-based association representing more than 100 freestanding emergency centers and an industry which employs nearly five thousand Texans. As you may know, Freestanding Emergency Centers (FECs) are fully equipped emergency departments staffed by board-certified, emergency medicine-trained physicians and registered nurses who are on-site 24 hours a day, seven days a week. These facilities are fully equipped for all medical emergencies, are highly regulated by the state and comply with all state EMTALA requirements, which mandate treatment of all patients regardless of their ability to pay. FECs have been a valuable resource during this national health crisis in treating Texans as well as helping relieve pressure on overburdened hospitals. Many healthcare facilities first opted not to offer COVID-19 assessments, leaving FECs, hospitals, and government entities as the lone providers willing or able to take the risk. As the demand grew, it was not uncommon to see patients waiting for many of the government and community testing centers’ appointments for 7- 14 days after exposure or onset of symptoms, which put pressure on FECs for those patients seeking immediate care.
    [Show full text]
  • NAMI Central Texas, NAMI Temple Area, NAMI Brazos Valley, NAMI Waco the Candidates Were Asked the Following Open-Ended Questions
    NAMI Texas #Vote4MentalHealth Region 5 State Candidate Questionnaire For NAMI Affiliates: NAMI Central Texas, NAMI Temple Area, NAMI Brazos Valley, NAMI Waco The candidates were asked the following open-ended questions: 1. Texas is experiencing a shortage of mental health and addiction care providers, especially in rural and underserved areas. How will you make sure more people have access to mental health treatment and services? 2. State and federal law requires mental health parity, or the During February 2020 and September-October 2020, NAMI equal treatment of mental health conditions and substance Texas’ Public Policy Team and our volunteers sent out a six- use disorders, compared to physical health conditions, in question mental health policy questionnaire via Google Forms to insurance plans. However, individuals in Texas still often every individual running for a state legislative seat in a contested receive unequal coverage for mental health treatment and race. Candidates were also provided information on NAMI Texas’ services. What will you do to improve coverage for public policy platform. We are only sharing the results for mental health care? candidates who are in a contested race. If we have not received a 3. At least 30% of individuals in local Texas jails have a completed questionnaire from a candidate, we will indicate that we severe mental illness, and more than half of justice- have not received a response yet. Reminders were sent on a weekly involved individuals nationwide have at least one mental basis to candidates who had not yet responded to the health condition. What will you do to divert people with questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • 87Th LEGISLATIVE SESSION and COVID RESTRICTIONS On
    87th LEGISLATIVE SESSION AND COVID RESTRICTIONS On January 12, 2021, lawmakers from across the state will convene the 87th Texas Legislative Session, meeting for the Regular Session over the following 140 days through May 31. This will be the first time that all 181 legislators will come together since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, and the virus is top-of-mind for everyone involved. While the Governor recently announced the re-opening of the Capitol building on January 4, we have minimal knowledge of the health and safety protocols the members, staff and Capitol visitors will have to follow when they enter the building next week. It will surely be a much different environment than previous sessions. We know the following requirements will be in place as of today, per a memo released by the State Preservation Board last week: • The Capitol building will only be open from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday; it will be closed Saturday and Sunday for cleaning. • The public may only enter through the North Capitol entrance. • Covid testing will be encouraged and provided on the North Plaza at no expense. • A mask will be required to be worn inside the building at all times. • All deliveries to the Capitol, including food and beverage, must be left at the loading dock; no delivery personnel will be allowed beyond the loading dock or through the public entrance. • No public tours or groups or sponsored event space will be available. • The House and Senate will manage public access to their offices once convened and rules are adopted, and the public will need to check with the offices directly for specific guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Vetoes of Legislation 85Th Legislature
    HOUSE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION October 5, 2017 Texas House of Representatives Vetoes of Legislation 85th Legislature Gov. Greg Abbott vetoed 50 bills approved by the 85th Legislature during the 2017 regular legislative session. The vetoed bills include 36 House bills and 14 Senate bills. This report includes a digest of each vetoed measure, the governor’s stated reason for the veto, and a response to the veto by the author or the sponsor of the bill. If the House Research Organization analyzed a vetoed bill, the Daily Floor Report in which the analysis appeared is cited. A summary of the governor’s line-item vetoes to SB 1 by Nelson, the general appropriations act for fiscal 2018-19, will appear in an upcoming House Research Organization state finance report, Texas Budget Highlights, Fiscal 2018-19. Focus Report: Number 85-7 Page 2 House Research Organization Contents Recognizing academic success by former special education students HB 61 by Guillen (Uresti) ............................................................................................................. 7 Entitling a parent to view a deceased child’s body before an autopsy HB 298 by Larson (Campbell) ..................................................................................................... 8 Requiring state agencies to cite legislation authorizing rules HB 462 by Dale (Zaffirini) ............................................................................................................ 9 Coordinating statewide pesticide disposal activities HB 572 by Stephenson (Kolkhorst)
    [Show full text]
  • Subcommittee Assignments
    H OUSE A PPROPRIATIONS C OMMITTEE TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES P.O. BOX 2910 • AUSTIN, TEXAS 78768-2910 GREG BONNEN CAMERON COCKE CHAIR COMMITTEE DIRECTOR MARY GONZÁLEZ Room E1.032 VICE CHAIR 512-463-1091 TO: MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE FROM: REPRESENTATIVE GREG BONNEN, M.D., CHAIRMAN DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2021 RE: SUBCOMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS Members, Due to inclement weather, the House Appropriations Committee will not convene for the previously posted hearing on Thursday, February 18, 2021. Pursuant to Rule 4, Sections 43 and 44, each committee may conduct its business through the use of subcommittees as determined by the chair, who shall appoint the membership of each subcommittee. Therefore, contingent upon entry of subcommittee appointments into the committee record, I create the following subcommittees and name the following chairs and members of each subcommittee: Subcommittee on Articles I, IV, and V Representative Mary González, CHAIR Representative Matt Schaefer, VICE CHAIR Representative Trent Ashby Representative Justin Holland Representative Carl Sherman Subcommittee on Article II Representative Giovanni Capriglione, CHAIR Representative Toni Rose, VICE CHAIR Representative Donna Howard Representative John Raney Representative Jay Dean Representative Julie Johnson Representative Gary Gates Representative Ann Johnson Subcommittee on Article III Representative Terry Wilson, CHAIR Representative Erin Zwiener, VICE CHAIR Representative Geanie Morrison Representative Gene Wu Representative Gary VanDeaver Representative
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 PAC Contributions
    2019-2020 Election Cycle Contributions State Candidate or Committee Name Party -District Total Amount ALABAMA Sen. Candidate Thomas Tuberville R $5,000 Rep. Candidate Jerry Carl R-01 $2,500 Rep. Michael Rogers R-03 $1,500 Rep. Gary Palmer R-06 $1,500 Rep. Terri Sewell D-07 $10,000 ALASKA Sen. Dan Sullivan R $3,800 Rep. Donald Young R-At-Large $7,500 ARIZONA Sen. Martha McSally R $10,000 Rep. Andy Biggs R-05 $5,000 Rep. David Schweikert R-06 $6,500 ARKANSAS Sen. Thomas Cotton R $7,500 Rep. Rick Crawford R-01 $2,500 Rep. French Hill R-02 $9,000 Rep. Steve Womack R-03 $2,500 Rep. Bruce Westerman R-04 $7,500 St. Sen. Ben Hester R-01 $750 St. Sen. Jim Hendren R-02 $750 St. Sen. Lance Eads R-07 $750 St. Sen. Milton Hickey R-11 $1,500 St. Sen. Bruce Maloch D-12 $750 St. Sen. Alan Clark R-13 $750 St. Sen. Breanne Davis R-16 $500 St. Sen. John Cooper R-21 $750 St. Sen. David Wallace R-22 $500 St. Sen. Ronald Caldwell R-23 $750 St. Sen. Stephanie Flowers D-25 $750 St. Sen. Eddie Cheatham D-26 $750 St. Sen. Trent Garner R-27 $750 St. Sen. Ricky Hill R-29 $500 St. Sen. Jane English R-34 $1,500 St. Rep. Lane Jean R-02 $500 St. Rep. Danny Watson R-03 $500 St. Rep. DeAnn Vaught R-04 $500 St. Rep. David Fielding D-05 $500 St. Rep. Matthew Shepherd R-06 $1,000 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Ethics Commission 2020 Lobbyists Receiving
    Texas Ethics Commission 2020 Lobbyists Sorted By Political Funds Provider Receiving Reimbursement from Political Funds Printed On Oct 1, 2021 Alvarado Campaign, Carol P.O. Box 230842 Austin TX 78701 00070461 Cardwell, Margaret Ann (Ms.) Attorney American Federation of Teachers - Texas 3000 SH I35 Suite 175 Austin TX 78701 00067181 Cates, Andrew S. (Mr.) Associated Republicans of Texas 807 Brazos Street Suite 601 Austin TX 78701 00037475 Yarbrough, Brian G. (Mr.) Attorney AT&T 208 St Akard St Bastrop TX 78602 00035480 Harris, Martha B. (Ms.) Consultant Bell Campaign, Keith P.O. Box 1178 Austin TX 78701 00070461 Cardwell, Margaret Ann (Ms.) Attorney Birdwell Campaign, Brian PO Box 1111 Austin TX 78701 00070461 Cardwell, Margaret Ann (Ms.) Attorney Bonnen Campaign, Dennis 122 East Myrtle Austin TX 78703 00085040 Eichler, Shera (Mrs.) Consultant Boyle, Stosh (The Honorable) 11665 Lower Seguin Road Austin TX 78747 00053964 Smith, Todd M. (Mr.) Impact Texas Communicaions, LLP Buckingham Campaign, Dawn P.O. Box 342524 Austin TX 78701 00055627 Blocker, Trey J. (Mr.) Attorney 10/1/21 Page 1 of 12 Bush Campaign, George P. P.O. Box 26677 Austin TX 78701 00070461 Cardwell, Margaret Ann (Ms.) Attorney Campaign to Elect Claudia Ordaz Perez PO Box 71738 El Paso TX 79901 00065437 Armendariz, Ricardo (Mr.) Public Affairs Campaign to Elect Vince Perez PO Box 71738 El Paso TX 79901 00065437 Armendariz, Ricardo (Mr.) Public Affairs Charles, Anderson (Rep.) P.O. Box 7752 Austin TX 78747 00053964 Smith, Todd M. (Mr.) Impact Texas Communicaions, LLP Christian Healthcare Ministries 127 Hazelwood Avenue Austin TX 78701 00035343 Hopkinson, Keith G.
    [Show full text]
  • District Profile
    WACO DISTRICT DISTRICT PROFILE The Waco District plans, designs, builds, operates and maintains the state transportation system in its eight counties. The district primarily conducts asset preservation and mobility projects to ensure the safety of the traveling public. The Waco district experiences a wide variety of challenges for maintenance crews and designers in maintaining district assets and ensuring the safety of the traveling public year-round. FAST FACTS (FY 2019): Population 770,900 Area (Sq. Miles) 7,589 District Engineer: Stanley Swiatek, P.E. Lane Miles 7,843 Daily Vehicle Miles 19,775,562 Physical/Mailing Address: Registered Vehicles 705,211 100 S. Loop Drive Waco, TX 76704 TxDOT Employees 333 Construction/Maintenance $279.5 million PH: (254) 867-2700 Expenditures Fax: (254) 867-2890 Percentage of Highway Projects 81% Completed On Time Counties: Percentage of Highway Projects Bell, Bosque, Coryell, Falls, 91% Hamilton, Hill, Limestone, Completed Under Budget McLennan KEY PROJECTS UNDERWAY: PLANNED KEY PROJECTS: State Senators: • I-35 (McLennan County) reconstruction • SH 6 - IH 35 to US 84- construct Sen. Brian Birdwell from N Loop 340 to 12th Street (6 continuous frontage roads and realign Sen. Dawn Buckingham miles) in Waco - $341 million ramps - $44 million Sen. Charles Schwertner • SH 31 – (Hill County) - widening and • US 190 construct additional lanes from new location from CR 3344 to Navarro IH 14 to FM 2657 - $43 million State Representatives: County Line - $72 million • SL 121 reconstruct and add lanes from Rep. Charles (Doc) • I-35E (Hill County) widening from Ellis FM 439 to IH 14 in Belton - $30 million Anderson County Line to I-35W split - $118 million • IH 35 reconstruct and widen to 8 lanes Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • IDEOLOGY and PARTISANSHIP in the 87Th (2021) REGULAR SESSION of the TEXAS LEGISLATURE
    IDEOLOGY AND PARTISANSHIP IN THE 87th (2021) REGULAR SESSION OF THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE Mark P. Jones, Ph.D. Fellow in Political Science, Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy July 2021 © 2021 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and the Baker Institute for Public Policy. Wherever feasible, papers are reviewed by outside experts before they are released. However, the research and views expressed in this paper are those of the individual researcher(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Baker Institute. Mark P. Jones, Ph.D. “Ideology and Partisanship in the 87th (2021) Regular Session of the Texas Legislature” https://doi.org/10.25613/HP57-BF70 Ideology and Partisanship in the 87th (2021) Regular Session of the Texas Legislature Executive Summary This report utilizes roll call vote data to improve our understanding of the ideological and partisan dynamics of the Texas Legislature’s 87th regular session. The first section examines the location of the members of the Texas Senate and of the Texas House on the liberal-conservative dimension along which legislative politics takes place in Austin. In both chambers, every Republican is more conservative than every Democrat and every Democrat is more liberal than every Republican. There does, however, exist substantial ideological diversity within the respective Democratic and Republican delegations in each chamber. The second section explores the extent to which each senator and each representative was on the winning side of the non-lopsided final passage votes (FPVs) on which they voted.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Pro-Life Voter Guide 2018 Republican Primary C4 2.17.18 7
    TEXAS PRO-LIFE VOTER GUIDE 2018 REPUBLICAN PRIMARY U.S. Senate Ted Cruz Early voting: February 20 - March 2 Election Day: March 6 U.S. Congress Please vote for all of Texas Right to Life’s endorsed candidates, & 1: Louie Gohmert take this Pro-Life voter guide with you into the voting booth. 2: Kathaleen Wall 3: Van Taylor Judge, Court of Criminal Texas House cont. Texas House cont. 4: John Ratcliffe Appeals, Place 8 18: Emily Kebodeaux Cook 93: Matt Krause 5: Bunni Pounds Michelle Slaughter 19: James White 94: Tony Tinderholt 6: Ron Wright State Board of Education, 21: Dade Phelan 96: Bill Zedler 7: John Culberson District 7 Matt Robinson 23: Mayes Middleton 97: Craig Goldman 8: Kevin Brady 24: Greg Bonnen 98: Armin Mizani 10: Michael McCaul Texas Senate 26: Rick Miller 99: Bo French 2: Bob Hall 11: Mike Conaway 29: Ed Thompson 105: Rodney Anderson 7: Paul Bettencourt 14: Randy Weber 45: Amber Pearce 106: Jared Patterson 8: Phillip Huffines 17: Bill Flores 47: Jay Wiley 107: Deanna Maria Metzger 9: Kelly Hancock 21: Chip Roy 52: Jeremy Story 108: Morgan Meyer 10: Konni Burton 22: Pete Olson 55: Brandon Hall 113: Jonathan Boos 16: Don Huffines 24: Kenny Marchant 56: Charles “Doc” Anderson 114: Lisa Luby Ryan 17: Joan Huffman 25: Roger Williams 59: Chris Evans 115: Matt Rinaldi 30: Pat Fallon 26: Michael Burgess 60: Mike Lang 121: Matt Beebe 31: Mike Canon and 31: John Carter 61: Phil King 122: Chris Fails Victor Leal 36: Brian Babin 62: Brent Lawson 126: Kevin Fulton Governor Greg Abbott Texas House 63: Tan Parker 128: Briscoe Cain Lieutenant Governor 2: Bryan Slaton 66: Matt Shaheen 129: Dennis Paul Dan Patrick 3: Cecil Bell, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Amicus Brief of Former Speakers of the House
    No. 21-0538 In the Supreme Court of Texas IN RE CHRIS TURNER, IN HIS CAPACITY AS A MEMBER OF THE TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND HIS CAPACITY AS CHAIR OF THE HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS; TEXAS AFL-CIO; HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS; MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS; TEXAS LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS; LEGISLATIVE STUDY GROUP; THE FOLLOWING IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: ALMA ALLEN, RAFAEL ANCHÍA, MICHELLE BECKLEY, DIEGO BERNAL, RHETTA BOWERS, JOHN BUCY, ELIZABETH CAMPOS, TERRY CANALES, SHERYL COLE, GARNET COLEMAN, NICOLE COLLIER, PHILIP CORTEZ, JASMINE CROCKETT, YVONNE DAVIS, JOE DESHOTEL, ALEX DOMINGUEZ, HAROLD DUTTON, JR., ART FIERRO, BARBARA GERVIN-HAWKINS, JESSICA GONZÁLEZ, MARY GONZÁLEZ, VIKKI GOODWIN, BOBBY GUERRA, RYAN GUILLEN, ANA HERNANDEZ, GINA HINOJOSA, DONNA HOWARD, CELIA ISRAEL, ANN JOHNSON, JARVIS JOHNSON, JULIE JOHNSON, TRACY KING, OSCAR LONGORIA, RAY LOPEZ, EDDIE LUCIO III, ARMANDO MARTINEZ, TREY MARTINEZ FISCHER, TERRY MEZA, INA MINJAREZ, JOE MOODY, CHRISTINA MORALES, EDDIE MORALES, PENNY MORALES SHAW, SERGIO MUÑOZ, JR., VICTORIA NEAVE, CLAUDIA ORDAZ PEREZ, EVELINA ORTEGA, LEO PACHECO, MARY ANN PEREZ, ANA-MARIA RAMOS, RICHARD RAYMOND, RON REYNOLDS, EDDIE RODRIGUEZ, RAMON ROMERO, JR., TONI ROSE, JON ROSENTHAL, CARL SHERMAN, SR., JAMES TALARICO, SHAWN THIERRY, SENFRONIA THOMPSON, JOHN TURNER, HUBERT VO, ARMANDO WALLE, GENE WU, AND ERIN ZWIENER; AND THE FOLLOWING IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS LEGISLATIVE EMPLOYEES: KIMBERLY PAIGE BUFKIN, MICHELLE CASTILLO, RACHEL PIOTRZKOWSKI, AND DONOVON RODRIGUEZ, Relators. Brief of Amici Curiae Former Speakers of the Texas House of Representatives and former Lieutenant Governor of the State of Texas in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus Jessica L. Ellsworth Blayne Thompson (pro hac vice application forthcoming) State Bar No.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven F. Hotze, M.D., the Sponsor Committee and Conservative
    SPONSOR COMMITTEE US Senators Cecil Bell Kenneth Sheets John Cornyn Dwayne Bohac Ralph Sheffield Ted Cruz Dennis Bonnen Ron Simmons US Congressmen Greg Bonnen David Simpson Joe Barton Linda Harper Brown Wayne Smith John Carter Cindy Burkett John Smithee John Culberson Angie Chen Button Drew Springer Sam Johnson Giovanni Capriglione Phil Stephenson Michael McCaul Travis Clardy Jonathan Stickland Pete Olson Byron Cook Ed Thompson Pete Sessions Tom Craddick Steve Toth Lamar Smith Myra Crownover Scott Turner Steve Stockman Drew Darby Jason Villaba Randy Weber John Davis James White Roger Williams Gary Elkins John Zerwas Statewide Officials Marsha Farney Bill Zedler PUBL Christie Craddick Allen Fletcher State Representative RE IC E AN IV S Susan Combs Dan Flynn Candidates T A O V F David Dewhurst Matt Frause Rodney Anderson R T E E S Jerry Patterson John Frullo TJ Fabby X N A O S Barry Smitherman Charlie Geren Wayne Faircloth C Todd Staples Craig Goldman Rob Henneke Statewide Patricia Harless Al Hoang Candidates Harvey Hilderbran Mark Keough Dan Branch Dan Huberty Brooks Langraf Wayne Christian Bryan Hughes Morgan Meyer DEFENSE OF TEXAS MARRIAGE Sid Miller Todd Hunter Dennis Paul Dan Patrick Jason Isaac Ted Seago AMENDMENT RALLY Ken Paxton Kyle Kacal Mike Schofield Ryan Sitton Ken King Matt Shaheen State Senators Phil King Stuart Spitzer Brian Birdwell Tim Kleinschmidt Conservative Donna Campbell Stephanie Klick Organization Craig Estes Lois Kolkhorst Leaders Troy Fraser John Kuempel Norman Adams Kelly Hancock Lyle Larson Dr. Ted Behr Jane Nelson Jodie Laubenberg Gary Bennet Robert Nichols George Lavender Gina Gleason Charles Schwertner Jeff Leach Dr.
    [Show full text]