Strasbourg, 11 March 1999

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strasbourg, 11 March 1999 Strasbourg, April 2000 DH-MIN (99) 2 Synthesis of the replies to the questionnaire on participation of minorities in decision-making processes Table of Contents Member States: Questionnaire .................................................................................................................. ALBANIA ...................................................................................................................... AUSTRIA ....................................................................................................................... BULGARIA.................................................................................................................... CROATIA ........................................................................................................................................... CYPRUS......................................................................................................................... CZECH REPUBLIC ...................................................................................................... DENMARK ................................................................................................................... ESTONIA ...................................................................................................................... FINLAND ...................................................................................................................... FRANCE......................................................................................................................... GERMANY .................................................................................................................... HUNGARY .................................................................................................................... LATVIA ......................................................................................................................... LITHUANIA .................................................................................................................. LUXEMBOURG ............................................................................................................ MOLDOVA .................................................................................................................... NETHERLANDS .......................................................................................................... NORWAY ...................................................................................................................... POLAND ....................................................................................................................... PORTUGAL ................................................................................................................... ROMANIA .................................................................................................................... RUSSIAN FEDERATION ............................................................................................ SAN MARINO ............................................................................................................... SLOVAK REPUBLIC ................................................................................................... SLOVENIA..................................................................................................................... SWEDEN ....................................................................................................................... SWITZERLAND ........................................................................................................... « the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia » ......................................................... UKRAINE....................................................................................................................... UNITED KINGDOM .................................................................................................... Non-member States: ARMENIA...................................................................................................................... AZERBAIJAN................................................................................................................ 2 QUESTIONNAIRE ON FORMS OF PARTICIPATION OF MINORITIES IN DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES I. Representation in political parties 1) Please list the policital parties that specifically represent a minority; 2) Please list parties that especially represent minorities’ interests but which are not minority parties as such; II. Parliamentary representation 3) Are there reserved seats in Parliament for minorities (if necessary make the distinction between the Lower Chamber and the Upper Chamber and indicate the number of seats available in each chamber)? 4) Did any of the political parties mentioned under questions 1 and 2 gain any seats at the last parliamentary elections? (please indicate the dates of the latest elections for each chamber)? 5) Please indicate whether persons belonging to minorities have been elected during the last elections on the list of other parties, and if so, please give details; 6) Please indicate whether there are any special provisions for minority parties regarding election thresholds; 7) Please indicate whether there are any parliamentary committees and/or sub- committees dealing with minority issues; III. Ombudspersons for minority and/or human rights or parliamentary committee for petitions 8) Do such bodies exist in your country? If so, what are the official titles? 9) Please indicate the legal basis on which they were created; 10) If there is an ombudsperson, please indicate how he/she is elected/nominated; 11) If there is an ombudsperson, please indiate his/her main functions and mandate; IV. Minister/ministry for national minorities 12) Is there a minister or ministry specifically responsible for national minorities issues? 13) If not, are there ministries which deal with minority issues in their own fields of activity? If so, which one(s)? V. Governmental Office for minorities 14) Does such an office exist in your country? If so, please indicate its exact name; 15) Please indicate the legal basis on which it has been established (Decree, etc.); 16) Please list its main functions; 17) Please indicate in a few lines how it works; 18) Please indicate the links with other institutions, such as government, parliament, councils/round tables for minorities (as under VI), self-governments etc. (as under VII) NGOs and civil society; 19) Please indicate the minorities involved in or covered by this Office; 20) Please indicate the name of the contact person for this Governmental Office; 3 VI. Councils or round-tables with representatives of minorities 21) Do such bodies exist in your country? If so, please indicate their exact name and level of application (state, regional or local); 22) Please indicate the legal basis on which they have been established; 23) Please list their main functions; 24) Please indicate in a few lines how they work; 25) Please indicate the links with other institutions, such as government, parliament, governmental office for minorities (as under V), self-governments, etc. (as under VII), NGOs and civil; 26) Please indicate the minorities involved in this Council/Round Table; 27) Please indicate the name of the contact person for this Council/Round Table; VII. Self-governments and forms of territorial or cultural autonomy, including those at regional and local level 28) Please indicate which forms exist in your country; 29) Please specify the legal basis on which they have been established; 30) If there are self-governments, please indicate their numbers and the minorities concerned; 31) Please indicate the main functions of these bodies; 32) Please indicate in a few lines how they work; 33) Please indicate the links with other institutions, such as government, parliament, governmental office for minorities (as under V), councils/rounds tables for minorities (as under VI), NGOs and civil; VIII. Public institutions or organisations 34) Please indicate public institutions that play a significant role in the field of the protection of minorities ; IX. Civil society: minority associations and NGOs 35) Please indicate registered minority associations and give relevant information; 36) Please indicate national NGOs or local branches of international NGOs dealing with minority issues; X. Legal texts 37) Please indicate any legal texts (or articles of these texts) referring to the participation of minorities in decision-making processes that have not been mentioned previously. XI. Please make any additional observations that you might wish to include 4 ALBANIA I. Representation in political parties 1. Parties that specifically In Albania political parties that specifically represent minorities do not exist. represent a minority According to Article 6, paragraph 5 of the Law no. 7502 (July 25, 1991) on political parties, the creation of a political party on a religious, ethnic or regional basis is not allowed. In Article 9 of the new draft Constitution, a special provision about political parties makes no prohibitive or affirmative reference as concerns the creation of parties on an ethnic basis, i.e. does not forbid but does not allow either such a creation explicitly. 2. Parties that especially The only political party representing minorities’ interests is “The Union for represent minorities’ interests Human Rights Party”. but which are not minority parties as such II. Parliamentary
Recommended publications
  • Ostracized in the West, Elected in the East – the Successors of the SED
    Volume 10. One Germany in Europe, 1989 – 2009 The Red Socks (June 24, 1994) The unexpected success of the successor party to the SED, the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS), at the ballot box in East Germany put the established (Western) parties in a difficult situation: what response was called for, ostracism or integration? The essay analyzes the reasons behind the success of the PDS in the East and the changing party membership. The Party that Lights a Fire Ostracized in the West, voted for in the East – the successors to the SED are drawing surprising support. Discontent over reunification, GDR nostalgia, or a yearning for socialism – what makes the PDS attractive? Last Friday, around 12:30 pm, a familiar ritual began in the Bundestag. When representative Uwe-Jens Heuer of the PDS stepped to the lectern, the parliamentary group of the Union [CDU/CSU] transformed itself into a raging crowd. While Heuer spoke of his party’s SED past, heckling cries rained down on him: “nonsense,” “outrageous.” The PDS makes their competitors’ blood boil, more so than ever. Saxony-Anhalt votes for a new Landtag [state parliament] on Sunday, and the successor to the SED could get twenty percent of the vote. It did similarly well in the European elections in several East German states. In municipal elections, the PDS has often emerged as the strongest faction, for example, in Halle, Schwerin, Rostock, Neubrandenburg, and Hoyerswerda. A specter is haunting East Germany. Is socialism celebrating a comeback, this time in democratic guise? All of the Bonn party headquarters are in a tizzy.
    [Show full text]
  • Closer Cooperation Between the Afd and the 'Pegida' Movement Could
    Closer cooperation between the AfD and the ‘Pegida’ movement could reshape the German right blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/01/05/closer-cooperation-between-the-afd-and-the-pegida-movement-could-reshape-the-german-right/ 05/01/2015 A number of rallies calling for greater restrictions on immigration have been held in Germany by the ‘Pegida’ movement (Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of the West). Julian M Hoerner writes on the link between the movement and the anti-euro Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party, led by Bernd Lucke. He argues that with the AfD appearing to be broadly supportive of Pegida, an alliance between the two groups could reshape the right of the German party system. In post-War Germany, it was once taken for granted that there could be no party to the right of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) which respected the German constitution, the Grundgesetz. This perceived wisdom has recently been called into question with the electoral success of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD). The party has the appearance of being populist and anti-euro, but is led by respectable figures from the conservative German establishment, many of them academics. However, the recent rapprochement of the party to a new anti-Islam, anti-immigration movement called ‘Pegida’ (Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of the West) calls the party’s liberal credentials into questions. The AfD and Pegida share the same regional strongholds and their supporters are united by unease with recent changes in German society. The ‘black box’ of the Pegida movement, with its diverse membership, might prove to be a link between the AfD and more radical and extremist elements, especially in Eastern Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Landtagspräsident Ehrt P
    VK 2B 03058F VK 5 20 Seite 6: Seite 11: Seite 20: Aktuelle Debatte über Landtagspräsident ehrt Vom Palais Brühl Neugestaltung der euro­ Persönlichkeiten mit zum Sächsischen päischen Agrarpolitik Verfassungsmedaille Ständehaus EDITORIAL INHALT PLENUM 12. Sitzung des Sächsischen Landtags Mehr Geld für Sachsens Hochschulen SPD sieht strukturelle Verbesserungen bei Forschung und Lehre ...............................................................................................................4 12. Sitzung des Sächsischen Landtags Verlässliche Chancen für Landwirtschaft CDU fordert Änderungen in der europäischen Agrarpolitik ..............6 Hintergrundinformationen zur deutschen EU-Ratspräsidentschaft 2020 .......................................................... 7 13. Sitzung des Sächsischen Landtags Sorge vor weiteren Provokationen AfD thematisiert Ausschreitungen in Stuttgart ...........................................8 13. Sitzung des Sächsischen Landtags Foto: S. Giersch Kritik am politischen Krisenmanagement DIE LINKE fordert Konsequenzen aus Liebe Bürgerinnen, liebe Bürger, innenpolitischen Vorfällen ................................................................................................9 13. Sitzung des Sächsischen Landtags mit zwei ausgefüllten Sitzungstagen Mitte Juli ging für den Sächsischen Innovationen gegen leere Innenstädte Landtag das erste Plenarjahr nach der Landtagswahl 2019 zu Ende. BÜNDNISGRÜNE wollen lebendige Stadtzentren bewahren ......... 10 Zentrale parlamentarische Momente, beginnend bei der konstituie­
    [Show full text]
  • The Innovation of Transition Regions Within the Regional Policy of the EU
    130 POLITOLOGICKÝ ČASOPIS / CZECH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE 2/2014 ARTICLES 131 Creating European Policy from a Regional Perspective – the Innovation of Transition Regions within the Regional Policy of the EU. Evidence from Saxony-Anhalt ROMANA SĂLĂGEANU* Abstract Looking from a regional perspective at the interests of regions and what they can and would do to achieve their goals, this paper analyzes the contribution made by regional politics to European policymaking processes by examining the activities of the German Land Saxony-Anhalt in a discussion of transition regions and transitional aid within European cohesion policy. Timing and the successful use of resources and available channels are elements in Saxony-Anhalt’s strategy for early mobilization and addressing its interests at the supranational level (that of the European Commission and the Committee of the Regions), as well as within intrastate channels (Europamininsterkonferenz, Bundesrat). Keywords: regional mobilization; multilevel governance; cohesion policy; transition regions DOI: 10.5817/PC2014-2-131 1. Introduction The multilevel governance aspect of the functioning of the European Union has been devel- oped with special regard for the European Regional Policy and the role of subnational actors, particularly in implementation processes. Marks describes the multilevel governance of the EU as “a system of continuous negotiation among nested governments at several territorial tiers” (Marks 1993: 392). The implementation of European policies does not necessarily in- clude participation in negotiating the regulations. However, regions may become involved in European policymaking processes by availing themselves of their opportunities for interest representation or lobbying. The activity of regions at the European level has been examined by a number of scholars, with special attention devoted to their activity in representing their interests and their influence on European policies at the European level (Tatham, Rowe).
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography of The
    Annotated Bibliography of the Cultural History of the German-speaking Communities in Alberta Seventh Up-Date: 2012-2013 © 2014 Compiler: Manfred Prokop Annotated Bibliography of the Cultural History of the German-speaking Communities in Alberta: 1882-2000. Seventh Up-Date: 2012-2013 Compiler: Manfred Prokop 209 Tucker Boulevard, Okotoks, AB, T1S 2K1 Phone/Fax: (403) 995-0321. E-Mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-0-9687876-9-4 © Manfred Prokop 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview and Quickstart ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Description of the Database ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Brief history of the project ............................................................................................................................... 2 Materials ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Sources ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Location and availability of materials .............................................................................................................. 3 Specialized keyword lists ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal of the European Union C 306/1
    Official Journal C 306 of the European Union Volume 60 English edition Information and Notices 15 September 2017 Contents I Resolutions, recommendations and opinions RESOLUTIONS Committee of the Regions 123rd plenary session, 11-12 May 2017 2017/C 306/01 Resolution of the European Committee of the Regions on the European Commission White Paper on the Future of Europe — Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025 . 1 2017/C 306/02 Resolution of the European Committee of the Regions on the Draft Annual EU Budget for 2018 . 5 OPINIONS Committee of the Regions 123rd plenary session, 11-12 May 2017 2017/C 306/03 Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the future of Cohesion Policy beyond 2020 — ‘For a strong and effective European cohesion policy beyond 2020’ . 8 2017/C 306/04 Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions — on Investing in Europe’s youth and the European Solidarity Corps . 20 2017/C 306/05 Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on ‘Improving the governance of the European Semester: a Code of Conduct for the involvement of local and regional authorities’ . 24 2017/C 306/06 Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on Social innovation as a new tool for addressing societal challenges . 28 2017/C 306/07 Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on The local and regional dimension of bioeconomy and the role of regions and cities . 32 EN 2017/C 306/08 Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on ‘Health in cities: the common good’ .
    [Show full text]
  • Flagging up the New Year Stand the Ground Memories from Pioneering Days
    2017 01 MAGAZINE OF THE LEIPZIG INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL E.V. IB WORLD SCHOOL Stand the ground MEMORIES FROM LIS PIONEERING DAYS Flag up ECC IS NOW LEIPZIG INTERNATIONAL KINDERGARTEN Pathfinders PRIMARY LEARNING DEFINITION Capture the flag POLITICS CLUB TRAVELLING TO LANDTAG OF SAXONY Flagging up the New Year Stand the ground Memories from pioneering days Deborah Fischer I started with LIS in the summer of 2003. I was drifting in Europe and was trying to find something to hold me down. I heard about an English school in the area and decided to give it a go. The school at the time was very small with a tiny staff and only about 100 or so students. Deborah performing in the staff musical The building and the classrooms were old and desperate "Into the Woods", 2006 for renovation. Everything about the school said “I’m a fixer-upper!” I saw this as a great opportunity – to be a part of something that had so much potential. I was young, in need of a challenge and needed a place to call home. Once I started teaching, meeting the kids, families and staff, I fell in love with my job. I was hooked. I’ve been home ever since. It was the last week of school, and the first week of summer...I believe it was in 2005 or 2006. The Primary School was just about to start its End of Year Drama Show. The Aula was packed. Then out of the blue (literally) a tremendous hail storm took over the city. Hail stones the size of golf balls began to not only beat against the Deborah's preschool class of 2003 – some of Aula windows, but also to crash through them, sending ice and shards of glass across these children will soon be graduating from LIS the room.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF-Download
    Headnotes to the Judgment of the Second Senate of 10 June 2014 - 2 BvE 2/09, 2 BvE 2/10 - 1. Pursuant to Article 54 sec. 1 of the Basic Law, it is the exclusive task of the Federal Convention to elect the Federal President; its proce- dures are meant to emphasise the particular dignity of this office. 2. Pursuant to Article 54 of the Basic Law, the members of the Federal Convention are granted only limited rights apart from participating in the election. Their legal position does not correspond to the position of the members of the Parliament (Bundestag). 1/29 FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Pronounced - 2 BvE 2/09 - on 10 June 2014 - 2 BvE 2/10 - Kunert Amtsinspektor as Registrar of the Court Registry IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE In the proceedings on the applications I. 1. to declare a) that respondent no. 1 violated the applicant’s rights under an analogous appli- cation of Article 38 section 1 sentence 2 of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz - GG) by not giving the applicant the opportunity to state reasons for or to speak on the subject of his motion concerning the introduction of own draft rules of pro- cedure for the Federal Convention, which he had introduced together with the members of the Federal Convention Apfel, Dr. Müller, and Hesselbarth during the 13th Federal Convention, b) that respondent no. 1 violated the applicant’s rights under an analogous appli- cation of Article 38 section 1 sentence 2 of the Basic Law by not putting to a vote in the plenary the motion to place the item “Presentation of the Candi- dates” on the agenda of the 13th Federal Convention, which had been intro- duced by the applicant and the members of the Federal Convention Apfel, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Split in Germany's Eurosceptic Afd Is Likely to Help
    How the split in Germany’s Eurosceptic AfD is likely to help Angela Merkel blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/08/04/how-the-split-in-germanys-eurosceptic-afd-is-likely-to-help-angela-merkel/ 8/4/2015 The Eurosceptic Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) narrowly failed to cross Germany’s five per cent electoral threshold in the country’s 2013 federal elections, but managed to gain seven MEPs in the 2014 European Parliament elections. However, as Julian M Hoerner notes, this initial success has evaporated in recent months following a split within the party. He writes that the split represented a fundamental disagreement between the AfD’s economically liberal/Eurosceptic wing, and a more traditional far-right element focused on restricting immigration, with the latter group now likely to dominate the party under the leadership of Frauke Petry. On 4 July, the eve of the Greek bailout referendum, the Alternative für Deutschland, Germany’s new Eurosceptic party, held a conference in the West German city of Essen. The founder and most prominent face of the party, Professor Bernd Lucke, failed to be re-elected as party leader. This outcome was the result of several months of severe infighting in the AfD epitomised by a conflict between Mr Lucke, who sits in the European Parliament, and Frauke Petry, the leader of the party in the Landtag of Saxony. Mr Lucke and other prominent ‘liberal’ members have since left the AfD – and with them around ten per cent of the party’s membership. Mr Lucke almost immediately founded a new party, the Alliance for Progress and Renewal or ‘ALFA’, which is, however, unlikely to be successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Use of the 690 to 790 Mhz Band in Germany for SAP/SAB
    Current Use of the 690 to 790 MHz Band in Germany for SAP/SAB Overview The following study provides information on the use of the 690-790 MHz tuning range currently under study for WRC 15 Agenda item 1.1 and 1.2.both before1 the introduction of mobile services in the 790-862 MHz band and after2. An average of 323 to 504 units are shown to be in use prior to the reallocation and 31.55 units after the reallocation. Use of the tuning range 470-862MHz will vary with location and TV allocations. If the 694-790MHz is allocated to mobile services the loss of the allocation to radio microphone has three impacts on these types of events: 1. Loss of the spectrum which in this sample relates to betweensome 32 to- 50 channels 2. In planning radio microphone use the third and fifth order (at least) intermodulation intercept points must be taken into account, this will cause insurmountable problems if attempts are made to pack an additional 32 channels into the remaining spectrum 470- 694MHz. An additional 32 to 50 channels will not be possible in existing allocations for these events 3. In addition the reorganisation of the DTT transmitters will further reduce the available spectrum for SAB/SAP in the 470-694 MHz band. Dependant on the final DTT plan and possible WSD use up to 75% of existing channels could be lost; this in turn will put in doubt out the survival of the events Background The following spectrum scans are mainly most times derived from a single scanning station and in many cases the scanning equipment and aerials are located indoors and may not have picked up the local TV stations or other SAB/SAP use.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Presidency of the European Union and The
    The German Presidency of the European Union and the Committee of the Regions German Chancellor Dr Angela Merkel on Michel Delebarre Emilia Müller the German presidency President of the head of the German Committee of the Regions delegation in the of the Council of the Committee of the Regions European Union Much is expected of the German presidency of the Council in On 1 January 2007 Germany took over the presidency of the the other hand it is essential to give fresh impetus to the the first half of 2007. Council of the European Union for six months. The 50th constitutional process. These two objectives will shape the course anniversary of the signing of the Rome treaties, which took place of presidency. In particular, the presidency is foreseen to outline a timetable on 25 March 1957, falls during the German presidency. The world that will smooth the way towards a European constitution before Up until the Spring Summit in March, clear priority will be given has changed radically over the past fifty years. It is the task of the Photo: to economic issues. We want to create in Europe the prerequisites the European Parliament elections in 2009. Here Germany can Bundeskanzleramt European Union to respond constructively to the changes on our for lasting economic success in order to safeguard the European draw on the symbolic power of the 50th anniversary of the Rome continent and in the world and to help actively shape events model as regards their living conditions and the European social treaties, which falls during those six months.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Contitutionalism in the German States
    Conference on Strengthening Constitutional Democracy. The role of provincial/regional and local government: Co - producing quality governance through innovation Cape Town, 19 – 21 August 2015 Democratic Constitutionalism in the German States: Legislatures, Sub-national Constitutionalism and Multilevel Systems Paper by PD Dr. Werner Reutter University Leipzig; Department of Political Science Beethovenstr. 15, 04107 Leipzig Email: [email protected] - Please, do neither quote nor disseminate without the permission of the author – Democracy means political self-determination1 that is the people’s right to take part in public decision-making. Constitutional democracies guarantee and limit this right. They provide the institutional set up to effectively use democratic rights and limit the way how this right is to be invoked. In representative democracies this means parliaments have to ‘stand for’ and ‘act for’ its people at the same time (Pitkin 1967; Reutter 2015). The 16 sub-national parliaments in Germany are supposed to accomplish this task by passing laws, making decisions, and by holding the executive to account. In particular German Länder enjoy constitutional autonomy. They have the prerogative to adopt and amendment constitutions. However, in the European and German multilevel system the capacity of German Land parliaments to effectively ‘act for’ its people is severely limited, if not suspended at all. However, this means that political self-determination – or in other words: constitutional democracy – is severely limited in the German states, if at all possible. In my paper I will address this question and explore how the German states addressed these issues and how they tried to strengthen constitutional democracy at the sub-national level.
    [Show full text]