DOCSLIB.ORG

Measuring Antimicrobial Consumption

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Measuring Antimicrobial Consumption Measuring antimicrobial consumption Katja de With Division of Infectious Diseases University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TUD Dresden © by author ESCMID Postgraduate Education Course Antimicrobial Stewardship: a Practical and ESCMID Online Lecture LibraryIntegrated Approach Antimicrobial consumption What to measure? How to measure? Why to measure? © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Antimicrobial consumption What to measure? • Antibacterials • Antimycotics Antiinfectives • Antimycobacterials • Antivirals © by author for: ESCMID• systemic Onlineuse Lecture Library • (local use) © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library ATC/DDD-Index (WHO) J ANTIINFEKTIVES FOR SYSTEMIC USE 1st level, anatomical main group J01 ANTIBACTERIALS FOR SYSTEMIC USE 2nd level, therapeutic subgroup J01C BETA-LACTAM ANTIBACTERIALS, 3rd level, pharmacological PENICILLINS subgroup J01CR Combinations of penicillins, incl. beta-lactamase 4th level, chemical subgroup inhibitors J01CR01 ampicillin and enzyme inhibitor 5th level, chemical substance J01CR04 sultamicillin (o) © by author5th level , chemical substance J01CR02 amoxicillin and enzyme inhibitor 5th level, chemical substance J01CR02 amoxicillin and enzyme inhibitor 5th level, chemical substance J01CR05ESCMIDpiperacillin and enzyme Onlineinhibitor Lecture5th level , chemicalLibrarysubstance ATC/DDD-Index and pitfalls J01 D other beta-lactams • cephalosporins • carbapenems J01 C beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins © by author ESCMID• aminopenicillins Online Lecture Library • ureidopenicillins Antimicrobial consumption methods • daily doses/1000 inhabitants/day (outpatient) • packages/1000 inhabitants/day (outpatient) • daily doses/100© by hospital author days (inpatient) • daily doses/100 cases (inpatient) ESCMID Online Lecture Library definition of daily dose DDD: defined daily dose (www.whocc.no) is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. RDD: recommended daily dose (www.antiinfektiva-surveillance.de) „German approach©“ tobyaccount authorfor guideline - recommended dosing („more realistic“) PDDESCMID: prescribed Onlinedaily d Lectureoses Library de With et al., 2009 ATC/DDD Index © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Definition of daily doses DDD = Defined Daily Dose (ATC/DDD-Index) RDD = Recommended Daily Dose (www.antiinfektiva-surveillance.de) DDD RDD cefuroxime © by author3 g iv 4,5 g iv cefuroxime 0,5 g po 1 g po ESCMIDceftazidime Online Lecture4 g iv Library6 g iv ampicillin/sulbactam 2 g iv 6 g iv flucloxacillin 2 g iv 8 g iv DDD vs RDD vs PDD preferable PDD Germany: preferable RDD because... DDD overestimate hospital antibiotic consumption especially of beta-lactames © by author ESCMIDDDD for international Online Lecture comparisons Library Calculation of antimicrobial consumption Drug usage in DDD = Number of units x Amount of drug per unit DDDdrug © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Calculation of antimicrobial consumption Drug usage in DDD = Number of units x Amount of drug per unit DDDdrug DDD (drug usage Cefuroxime) = 200 (infusions) x 1,5 g © by author3 g (DDD for Cefuroxime) ESCMID Online Lecture Library Exercise I hospital A: 1500 infusions flucloxacillin (2g) I hospital B: 1500 infusions cefuroxime (1,5g) hospital A (flucloxacillin) flucloxacillin IV cefuroxime IV hospital B (cefuroxime) DDD 2 g 3 g © by authorRDD 8 g 4,5 g number ESCMID Online LectureDDD Library number RDD infusions Use density use density DDD/100 hospital days only use density is eligible for comparisons © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Exercise I hospital A: 1500 infusions Flucloxacillin (2g), 58000 care days I hospital B: 1500 infusions Cefuroxim (1,5g), 22000 care days flucloxacillin IV cefuroxime IV hospital A (flucloxacillin) (hospital A) (hospital B) hospital B (cefuroxime) DDD 2 g 3 g © by authorRDD 8 g 4,5 g number 1500 750 DDD number ESCMID Online Lecture Library375 500 RDD DDD/100 RDD/100 DDD vs „RDD“ © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Haug et al., 2013 Where to evaluate antimicrobial consumption at hospital? hospital overall separate high-consumer-areas • Urology • ENT • Intensive care units© by author • hematology/onkology ESCMID Online Lecture Library …how often evaluate antimicrobial consumption??? yearly quarterly © by author ESCMIDmonthly Online Lecture Library www.antiinfektiva-surveillance.de Antibiotic Stewardship at the ICU © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Summary Daily doses per 100 hospital days Hospital-wide, for individual departments and at ward level specific antibiotic classes Top 15 antibiotics© by author parenteral vs. oral ESCMID Online Lecture Library .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consideration of Antibacterial Medicines As Part Of
    Consideration of antibacterial medicines as part of the revisions to 2019 WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for adults (EML) and Model List of Essential Medicines for children (EMLc) Section 6.2 Antibacterials including Access, Watch and Reserve Lists of antibiotics This summary has been prepared by the Health Technologies and Pharmaceuticals (HTP) programme at the WHO Regional Office for Europe. It is intended to communicate changes to the 2019 WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for adults (EML) and Model List of Essential Medicines for children (EMLc) to national counterparts involved in the evidence-based selection of medicines for inclusion in national essential medicines lists (NEMLs), lists of medicines for inclusion in reimbursement programs, and medicine formularies for use in primary, secondary and tertiary care. This document does not replace the full report of the WHO Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines (see The selection and use of essential medicines: report of the WHO Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines, 2019 (including the 21st WHO Model List of Essential Medicines and the 7th WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1021). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330668/9789241210300-eng.pdf?ua=1) and Corrigenda (March 2020) – TRS1021 (https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/TRS1021_corrigenda_March2020. pdf?ua=1). Executive summary of the report: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/325773/WHO- MVP-EMP-IAU-2019.05-eng.pdf?ua=1.
    [Show full text]
  • Conjugate and Prodrug Strategies As Targeted Delivery Vectors for Antibiotics † † ‡ Ana V
    Review Cite This: ACS Infect. Dis. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX pubs.acs.org/journal/aidcbc Signed, Sealed, Delivered: Conjugate and Prodrug Strategies as Targeted Delivery Vectors for Antibiotics † † ‡ Ana V. Cheng and William M. Wuest*, , † Department of Chemistry, Emory University, 1515 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States ‡ Emory Antibiotic Resistance Center, Emory School of Medicine, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States ABSTRACT: Innate and developed resistance mechanisms of bacteria to antibiotics are obstacles in the design of novel drugs. However, antibacterial prodrugs and conjugates have shown promise in circumventing resistance and tolerance mechanisms via directed delivery of antibiotics to the site of infection or to specific species or strains of bacteria. The selective targeting and increased permeability and accumu- lation of these prodrugs not only improves efficacy over unmodified drugs but also reduces off-target effects, toxicity, and development of resistance. Herein, we discuss some of these methods, including sideromycins, antibody-directed prodrugs, cell penetrating peptide conjugates, and codrugs. KEYWORDS: oligopeptide, sideromycin, antibody−antibiotic conjugate, cell penetrating peptide, dendrimer, transferrin inding new and innovative methods to treat bacterial F infections comes with many inherent challenges in addition to those presented by the evolution of resistance mechanisms. The ideal antibiotic is nontoxic to host cells, permeates bacterial cells easily, and accumulates at the site of infection at high concentrations. Narrow spectrum drugs are also advantageous, as they can limit resistance development and leave the host commensal microbiome undisturbed.1 However, various resistance mechanisms make pathogenic infections difficult to eradicate: Many bacteria respond to antibiotic pressure by decreasing expression of active transporters and porins2 and 3,4 Downloaded via EMORY UNIV on April 18, 2019 at 12:34:17 (UTC).
    [Show full text]
  • Twocases of Severe Bronchiectasis Successfully Treated With
    CASE REPORT TwoCases of Severe Bronchiectasis Successfully Treated with a Prolonged Course of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole Takayuki Honda, Muneharu Hayasaka*, Tsutomu Hachiya*, Keishi Kubo*, Tsutomu Katsuyama and Atsuo Nagata** Twopatients with severe bronchiectasis, one patient without other disease and the other with hyper IgE syndrome, were successfully treated with long-term therapy with low doses oftrimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ).Recurrent respiratory infections with productive cough and high fever were resistant to various antibiotics and often disturbed the patients' activities in daily life. However, they showed marked improvement following TMP-SMZtherapy, which was started for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)infection. MRSAdisappeared some months later, but Pseudomonas aeruginosa appeared again in the sputum. Both patients, however, have remained free from symptomsfor over one year. (Internal Medicine 35: 979-983, 1996) Key words: hyper IgE syndrome, lower respiratory infection, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonasaeruginosa Introduction toms which disturbed his activity in daily life. Hemophilis influenzae and/or Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) It has been reported that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were isolated from his sputum. He had received many different (TMP-SMZ) is effective for short-term and long-term use in the antibiotics including ampicillin, piperacillin sodium, treatment of chronic respiratory infections (1, 2). Recently, sultamicillin tosilate, cefazolin sodium, cefotiam hexetil hy- however, TMP-SMZhas not been considered the drug of first drochloride, cefteram pivoxil, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin hy- choice for various bacterial infections due to its side effects and drochloride and ofloxacin. They were sensitive to at least one because of the development of new antibiotics. Wedescribe antibiotic. However,other antibiotics were tried due to repeated here two cases with severe bronchiectasis successfully treated fever.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinusitis (Acute): Antimicrobial Prescribing Guideline Evidence Review
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence APG Sinusitis (acute) Sinusitis (acute): antimicrobial prescribing guideline Evidence review October 2017 Final version Contents Disclaimer The recommendations in this guideline represent the view of NICE, arrived at after careful consideration of the evidence available. When exercising their judgement, professionals are expected to take this guideline fully into account, alongside the individual needs, preferences and values of their patients or service users. The recommendations in this guideline are not mandatory and the guideline does not override the responsibility of healthcare professionals to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual patient, in consultation with the patient and/or their carer or guardian. Local commissioners and/or providers have a responsibility to enable the guideline to be applied when individual health professionals and their patients or service users wish to use it. They should do so in the context of local and national priorities for funding and developing services, and in light of their duties to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, to advance equality of opportunity and to reduce health inequalities. Nothing in this guideline should be interpreted in a way that would be inconsistent with compliance with those duties. NICE guidelines cover health and care in England. Decisions on how they apply in other UK countries are made by ministers in the Welsh Government, Scottish Government, and Northern Ireland Executive. All NICE guidance is subject to regular review and may be updated or withdrawn. Copyright © NICE 2017. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights. Contents Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1.0 Name of the Medicinal Product Unasyn 2.0
    Pfizer Confidential Disclaimer While these labels are the most current Drug Control Authority (DCA) approved versions of content, these are not necessarily reflective of final printed labeling currently in distribution LPD Title: Sultamicillin LPD Date: 22 June 2017 Country: Malaysia Reference Document: CDS Version 7.0; 06 October 2016 Reason for Change: Update to align with CDS 6.0 – Section 4.4 "Special warnings and precautions for use" with addition of labeling wording for Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR), remove Unasyn from Pharmaniaga details as product will be withdrawn. Sultamicillin CDS revisions in Sec 4.4 "Special warnings and precautions for use" with the addition of a warning statement on hepatotoxicity. The warning statement for SCAR in Section 4.4 has been revised to replace ampicillin/sulbactam with sultamicillin to enhance clarity. Sec 4.8 is revised: the wording relating to the ADRs associated with IM/IV formulation will be revised to delete the term “Cholestasis hepatic,” which in the past was substituted for the ADR PT 'Hepatitis cholestatic' (MedDRA version 19.0). Bilirubinaemia is also changed to the MedDRA PT Hyperbilirubinaemia to align with the ampicillin/sulbactam parenteral CDS. To add acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) information as requested by NPRA (to standardize with Unasyn IM/IV PI) 1.0 NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT UNASYN 2.0 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Sultamicillin is a double ester in which ampicillin and the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam are linked via a methylene group. Chemically, sultamicillin is the oxymethylpenicillinate sulfone ester of ampicillin and has a molecular weight of 594.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of Precautions
    Published by Translated by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency This English version is intended to be a reference material to provide convenience for users. In the event of inconsistency between the Japanese original and this English translation, the former shall prevail. Revision of Precautions Cefmenoxime hydrochloride (preparations for otic and nasal use), chloramphenicol (solution for topical use, oral dosage form), tetracycline hydrochloride (powders, capsules), polymixin B sulfate (powders), clindamycin hydrochloride, clindamycin phosphate (injections), benzylpenicillin potassium, benzylpenicillin benzathine hydrate, lincomycin hydrochloride hydrate, aztreonam, amoxicillin hydrate, ampicillin hydrate, ampicillin sodium, potassium clavulanate/amoxicillin hydrate, dibekacin sulfate (injections), sultamicillin tosilate hydrate, cefaclor, cefazolin sodium, cefazolin sodium hydrate, cephalexin (oral dosage form with indications for otitis media), cefalotin sodium, cefixime hydrate, cefepime dihydrochloride hydrate, cefozopran hydrochloride, cefotiam hydrochloride (intravenous injections), cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride hydrate, cefditoren pivoxil, cefdinir, ceftazidime hydrate, cefteram pivoxil, ceftriaxone sodium hydrate, cefpodoxime proxetil, cefroxadine hydrate, cefuroxime axetil, tebipenem pivoxil, doripenem hydrate, bacampicillin hydrochloride, panipenem/betamipron, faropenem sodium hydrate, flomoxef sodium, fosfomycin calcium hydrate, meropenem hydrate, chloramphenicol sodium succinate,
    [Show full text]
  • How to Choose Among the Myriad of Antibiotics?
    How to choose among the myriad of antibiotics? Considerations for the beta- lactams, aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. HO Pak Leung 何栢良醫生 MBBS, FACP, MRCP, MRCPath, FRCPA, FHKCPath, FHKAM Draft as of Aug 2004 www.HoPakLeung.com We seek to improve the quality of this compendium. If you have comments or suggestion on this draft, please email to [email protected] NOTICE While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in the compendium, the possibilities of human errors or changes in medical practice/knowledge exists. Reader should therefore check the latest product information of drugs (especially for new and infrequently used drugs) or tests before they are used. The most recent recommended clinical practice and normal values of individual laboratories should also be taken into account. This publication contains information relating to general principles of medical care, which should not be construed as specific instructions for individual patients. Manufacturers' product information and package inserts should be reviewed for current information, including contraindications, dosages and precautions. 3 Contents 1 Beta-lactams 3 2 Aminoglycosides 15 3 Quinolones 26 4 – Beta-lactams – 1 Beta-lactams INTRODUCTION β-lactams belong to a group of antibiotics that exert their antibacterial effect by inhibition of enzymes (transpeptidase and decarboxylase) that are critical for cell wall synthesis. They have in common a β-lactam ring that form part of the nucleus of the molecule. Classification of the β-lactams was based traditionally on the chemical structures and is complex. For practical purposes, the major groups of β- lactams include the penicillins, cephalosporins, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLBLI) and carbapenems.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibacterial Prodrugs to Overcome Bacterial Resistance
    molecules Review Antibacterial Prodrugs to Overcome Bacterial Resistance Buthaina Jubeh , Zeinab Breijyeh and Rafik Karaman * Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem P.O. Box 20002, Palestine; [email protected] (B.J.); [email protected] (Z.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] or rkaraman@staff.alquds.edu Academic Editor: Helen Osborn Received: 10 March 2020; Accepted: 26 March 2020; Published: 28 March 2020 Abstract: Bacterial resistance to present antibiotics is emerging at a high pace that makes the development of new treatments a must. At the same time, the development of novel antibiotics for resistant bacteria is a slow-paced process. Amid the massive need for new drug treatments to combat resistance, time and effort preserving approaches, like the prodrug approach, are most needed. Prodrugs are pharmacologically inactive entities of active drugs that undergo biotransformation before eliciting their pharmacological effects. A prodrug strategy can be used to revive drugs discarded due to a lack of appropriate pharmacokinetic and drug-like properties, or high host toxicity. A special advantage of the use of the prodrug approach in the era of bacterial resistance is targeting resistant bacteria by developing prodrugs that require bacterium-specific enzymes to release the active drug. In this article, we review the up-to-date implementation of prodrugs to develop medications that are active against drug-resistant bacteria. Keywords: prodrugs; biotransformation; targeting; β-lactam antibiotics; β-lactamases; pathogens; resistance 1. Introduction Nowadays, the issue of pathogens resistant to drugs and the urgent need for new compounds that are capable of eradicating these pathogens are well known and understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflammatory Index and Treatment of Brain Abscess
    CASE REPORT Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 74. 313 ~ 324, 2012 INFLAMMATORY INDEX AND TREATMENT OF BRAIN ABSCESS HIROFUMI OYAMA, AKIRA KITO, HIDEKI MAKI, KENICHI HATTORI, TOMOYUKI NODA and KENTARO WADA Department of Neurosurgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki 503-8502, Japan ABSTRACT This study retrospectively analyzed 12 patients with brain abscesses. Half of the patients were diag- nosed inaccurately in the initial stage, and 7.2 days were required to achieve the final diagnosis of brain abscess. The patients presented only with a moderately elevated leukocyte count, serum CRP levels, or body temperatures during the initial stage. These markers changed, first with an increase in the leukocyte count, followed by the CRP and body temperature. The degree of elevation tended to be less prominent, and the time for each inflammatory index to reach its maximum value tended to be longer in the patients without ventriculitis than in those with it. The causative organisms of a brain abscess were detected in 10 cases. The primary causative organisms from dental caries were Streptococcus viridians or milleri, and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Nocardia sp. or farcinica were common when the abscess was found in other regions. The primary causative organisms of unrecognized sources of infection were Streptococcus milleri and Prolionibacterium sp. Nocardia is resistant to many antibiotics. However, carbapenem, tetracycline and quinolone were effective for Nocardia as well as many other kinds of bacteria. In summary, the brain abscesses presented with only mildly elevated inflammatory markers of body temperature, leukocyte and CRP. These inflammatory markers were less obvious in the patients without ventriculitis and/or meningitis.
    [Show full text]
  • Penicillin Vk
    NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM Technical Report Series No. 336 ._ 1,1 K*'t I ^ cs"*- TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS STUDIES OF PENICILLIN VK (CAS NO. 132-98-9) IN F344/N RATS AND B6C3Fi MICE (GAVAGE STUDIES) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutes of Health NTP TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS STUDIES OF PENICILLIN VK (CAS NO. 132-98-9) IN F344/N RATS AND B6C3F1 MICE (GAVAGE STUDIES) June K. Dunnick, Ph.D., Chemical Manager NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM P.O. Box 12233 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 June 1988 NTP TR 336 NIH Publication No. 88-2592 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutes of Health NOTETOTHEREADER This study was performed under the direction of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sci- ences as a function of the National Toxicology Program. The studies described in this Technical Re- port have been conducted in compliance with NTP chemical health and safety requirements and must meet or exceed all applicable Federal, state, and local health and safety regulations. Animal care and use were in accordance with the U.S.Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Ani- mals. All NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies are subjected to a data audit before being pre- sented for public peer review. Although every effort is made to prepare the Technical Reports as accurately as possible, mistakes may occur. Readers are requested to identify any mistakes so that corrective action may be taken. Further, anyone who is aware of related ongoing or published studies not mentioned in this report is encouraged to make this information known to the NTP, Comments and questions about the National Toxicology Program Teohnical Reports on Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies should be directed to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Analysis Plan / Data Specifications the Risk of Acute Liver Injury Associated with the Use of Antibiotics. a Replica
    WP6 validation on methods involving an extended audience Statistical analysis plan / data specifications The risk of acute liver injury associated with the use of antibiotics. A replication study in the Utrecht Patient Oriented Database Version: July 11, 2013 Authors: Renate Udo, Marie L De Bruin Reviewers: Work package 6 members (David Irvine, Stephany Tcherny-Lessenot) 1 1. Context The study described in this protocol is performed within the framework of PROTECT (Pharmacoepidemiological Research on Outcomes of Therapeutics by a European ConsorTium). The overall objective of PROTECT is to strengthen the monitoring of the benefit-risk of medicines in Europe. Work package 6 “validation on methods involving an extended audience” aims to test the transferability/feasibility of methods developed in other WPs (in particular WP2 and WP5) in a range of data sources owned or managed by Consortium Partners or members of the Extended Audience. The specific aims of this study within WP6 are: to evaluate the external validity of the study protocol on the risk of acute liver injury associated with the use of antibiotics by replicating the study protocol in another database, to study the impact of case validation on the effect estimate for the association between antibiotic exposure and acute liver injury. Of the selected drug-adverse event pairs selected in PROTECT, this study will concentrate on the association between antibiotic use and acute liver injury. On this topic, two sub-studies are performed: a descriptive/outcome validation study and an association study. The descriptive/outcome validation study has been conducted within the Utrecht Patient Oriented Database (UPOD).
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotics for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adult Outpatients (Review)
    Antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients (Review) Pakhale S, Mulpuru S, Verheij TJM, Kochen MM, Rohde GGU, Bjerre LM This is a reprint of a Cochrane review, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration and published in The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 10 http://www.thecochranelibrary.com Antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients (Review) Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. TABLEOFCONTENTS HEADER....................................... 1 ABSTRACT ...................................... 1 PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY . 2 BACKGROUND .................................... 3 OBJECTIVES ..................................... 4 METHODS...................................... 4 RESULTS....................................... 7 Figure1. ..................................... 8 Figure2. ..................................... 8 Figure3. ..................................... 10 Figure4. ..................................... 11 DISCUSSION ..................................... 13 AUTHORS’CONCLUSIONS . 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 15 REFERENCES ..................................... 16 CHARACTERISTICSOFSTUDIES . 24 DATAANDANALYSES. 43 Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Solithromycin versus levofloxacin, Outcome 1 Test-of-clinical-cure. 46 Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Solithromycin versus levofloxacin, Outcome 2 Bacteriological cure. 46 Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Solithromycin versus levofloxacin, Outcome 3 Adverse events. 47 Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Nemonoxacin versus levofloxacin, Outcome
    [Show full text]