DOCSLIB.ORG

Best Tablets June 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Best Tablets June 2021 24.06.2021 Best Tablets - June 2021 Best Tablets June 2021 Choose OS Android iOS Choose test 3DMark for Android Wild Life Performance 3DMark for Android Wild Life Performance 3DMark for Android Wild Life Unlimited 3DMark for Android Wild Life Extreme 3DMark for Android Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1 / Metal) 3DMark for Android Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan / Metal) 3DMark for Android Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited 3DMark for Android Sling Shot 3DMark for Android Sling Shot Unlimited PCMark for Android Work 3.0 Performance PCMark for Android Work 3.0 Battery Life PCMark for Android Work 2.0 Performance PCMark for Android Work 2.0 Battery Life PCMark for Android Computer vision PCMark for Android Storage 2.0 PCMark for Android Storage Choose category Phone Tablet Other Choose screen size 3.0" 15.0" 3.0" 15.0" Search Model name Rank Device Performance Screen Hardware Popularity Apple M1 Apple Up to 3.2 GHz quad- iPad Pro core "Firestorm" and 1 17133 12.9" 2.8 12.9 2.064 GHz quad-core (2021) "Icestorm" Apple M1 GPU https://benchmarks.ul.com/compare/best-tablets 1/7 24.06.2021 Best Tablets - June 2021 Rank Device Performance Screen Hardware Popularity Apple M1 Up to 3.2 GHz quad- Apple core "Firestorm" and 2 iPad Pro 17084 11" 3.7 2.064 GHz quad-core 11 (2021) "Icestorm" Apple M1 GPU Apple A12Z Bionic Apple Up to 2.49 GHz quad- iPad Pro 3 12749 12.9" core "Vortex" and quad- 0.6 12.9 core "Tempest" (2020) Apple A12Z GPU Apple A12Z Bionic Apple Up to 2.49 GHz quad- 4 iPad Pro 12565 11" core "Vortex" and quad- 1.4 11 (2020) core "Tempest" Apple A12Z GPU Apple A12X Bionic Apple Up to 2.49 GHz quad- iPad Pro 5 10587 12.9" core "Vortex" and quad- 0.5 12.9 core "Tempest" (2018) Apple A12X GPU Apple A12X Bionic Apple Up to 2.49 GHz quad- 6 iPad Pro 9907 11" core "Vortex" and quad- 0.8 11 (2018) core "Tempest" Apple A12X GPU Apple A14 Bionic Up to 3.1 GHz dual-core Apple "Firestorm" and 1.8 7 iPad Air 8507 10.9" 0.9 GHz quad-core (2020) "Icestorm" Apple A14 GPU Apple A12 Bionic Apple Up to 2.49 GHz dual- 8 iPad Air 6351 10.5" core "Vortex" and quad- 0.4 2019 core "Tempest" Apple A12 GPU Apple A12 Bionic Apple Up to 2.49 GHz dual- 9 iPad mini 5869 7.9" core "Vortex" and quad- 0.4 2019 core "Tempest" Apple A12 GPU Snapdragon 888 Up to 2.84 GHz single- Xiaomi core Kryo 680, 2.42 10 Mi Mix 5580 8.01" GHz tri-core Kryo 680 0.0 Fold & 1.8 GHz quad-core Kryo 680 Adreno 660 https://benchmarks.ul.com/compare/best-tablets 2/7 24.06.2021 Best Tablets - June 2021 Rank Device Performance Screen Hardware Popularity Apple A12 Bionic Apple Up to 2.49 GHz dual- 11 iPad 10.2 5503 10.2" core "Vortex" and quad- 0.4 (2020) core "Tempest" Apple A12 GPU Apple A10X Apple Up to 2.36 GHz hexa- 12 iPad Pro 5392 12.9" 0.1 core "Fusion" 2017 12.9 Apple A10X GPU Apple A10X Apple Up to 2.36 GHz hexa- 13 iPad Pro 5361 10.5" 0.4 core "Fusion" 2017 10.5 Apple A10X GPU Snapdragon 870 5G Up to 3.2 GHz single- Lenovo core Kryo 585, 2.42 14 Yoga Pad 4219 13" GHz tri-core Kryo 585 0.0 Pro & 1.8 GHz quad-core Kryo 585 Adreno 650 Snapdragon 865 Plus Up to 3.1 GHz single- Samsung core Kryo 585, 2.42 Galaxy 15 4215 11" GHz tri-core Kryo 585 0.3 Tab S7 & 1.8 GHz quad-core Wi-Fi Kryo 585 Adreno 650 Snapdragon 865 Plus Up to 3.1 GHz single- Samsung core Kryo 585, 2.42 Galaxy 16 4207 11" GHz tri-core Kryo 585 0.1 Tab S7 & 1.8 GHz quad-core LTE Kryo 585 Adreno 650 Snapdragon 865 Plus Up to 3.1 GHz single- Samsung core Kryo 585, 2.42 Galaxy 17 4143 12.4" GHz tri-core Kryo 585 0.3 Tab S7+ & 1.8 GHz quad-core Wi-Fi Kryo 585 Adreno 650 Snapdragon 865 Plus Up to 3.1 GHz single- Samsung core Kryo 585, 2.42 Galaxy 18 4141 12.4" GHz tri-core Kryo 585 0.1 Tab S7+ & 1.8 GHz quad-core 5G Kryo 585 Adreno 650 https://benchmarks.ul.com/compare/best-tablets 3/7 24.06.2021 Best Tablets - June 2021 Rank Device Performance Screen Hardware Popularity Apple A9X Apple Up to 2.26 GHz dual- 19 3793 12.9" 0.1 iPad Pro core "Twister" Apple A9X GPU Apple A9X Apple Up to 2.26 GHz dual- 20 iPad Pro 3367 9.7" 0.1 core "Twister" 9.7 Apple A9X GPU HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G 2.86GHz dual-core ARM Cortex-A76, Huawei 2.09GHz dual-core 21 MatePad 3277 10.8" 0.0 ARM Cortex-A76, 10.8 1.86GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 Mali-G76 MP16 HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G 2.86GHz dual-core ARM Cortex-A76, Huawei 2.09GHz dual-core 22 MatePad 3269 10.8" 0.0 ARM Cortex-A76, Pro 1.86GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 Mali-G76 MP16 Snapdragon 855 Up to 2.84 GHz single- Samsung core Kryo 485, 2.42 23 Galaxy 3062 7.3" GHz tri-core Kryo 485 0.0 Fold 5G & 1.8 GHz quad-core Kryo 485 Adreno 640 Snapdragon 855 Up to 2.84 GHz single- Samsung core Kryo 485, 2.42 Galaxy 24 3040 6.7" GHz tri-core Kryo 485 0.0 S10 5G & 1.8 GHz quad-core (SDM855) Kryo 485 Adreno 640 Apple A10 Apple Up to 2.3 GHz quad- 25 iPad 9.7 2736 9.7" 0.2 core "Fusion" (2018) Apple A10 GPU Apple A10 Apple Up to 2.3 GHz quad- 26 2706 10.2" 0.2 iPad 10.2 core "Fusion" Apple A10 GPU https://benchmarks.ul.com/compare/best-tablets 4/7 24.06.2021 Best Tablets - June 2021 Rank Device Performance Screen Hardware Popularity Snapdragon 855 Up to 2.84 GHz single- Samsung core Kryo 485, 2.42 27 Galaxy 2128 7.3" GHz tri-core Kryo 485 0.0 Fold & 1.8 GHz quad-core Kryo 485 Adreno 640 Snapdragon 855 Up to 2.84 GHz single- Samsung core Kryo 485, 2.42 28 Galaxy 2110 10.5" GHz tri-core Kryo 485 0.2 Tab S6 & 1.8 GHz quad-core Kryo 485 Adreno 640 Snapdragon 855 Plus Up to 2.96 GHz single- Samsung core Kryo 485, 2.42 29 Galaxy 2109 10.5" GHz tri-core Kryo 485 0.0 Tab S6 5G & 1.8 GHz quad-core Kryo 485 Adreno 640 Apple Apple A10 iPod Up to 2.3 GHz quad- 30 1904 4" 0.0 Touch 7th core "Fusion" Gen Apple A10 GPU Apple A9 Apple Up to 1.84 GHz dual- 31 1856 9.7" 0.1 iPad 9.7 core "Twister" Apple A9 GPU Snapdragon 835 Samsung (MSM8998) Galaxy Up to 2.35 GHz quad- 32 1125 10.5" 0.0 Tab S4 core Kyro & 1.9 GHz 10.5 quad-core Kyro Adreno 540 Helio P70 Up to 2.1 GHz quad- core ARM Cortex-A73 33 Oppo A9 713 6.53" 0.0 & 2 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 Mali-G72 MP3 Helio P70 Up to 2.1 GHz quad- core ARM Cortex-A73 34 Oppo A9x 706 6.53" 0.0 & 2 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 Mali-G72 MP3 https://benchmarks.ul.com/compare/best-tablets 5/7 24.06.2021 Best Tablets - June 2021 Rank Device Performance Screen Hardware Popularity Tiger T618 Up to 2.0 GHz dual-core Teclast ARM Cortex-A75 & 1.8 35 699 10.1" 0.0 M40 GHz hexa-core ARM Cortex-A55 Mali-G52 MP2 Tiger T618 Up to 2.0 GHz dual-core Alldocube ARM Cortex-A75 & 1.8 36 698 10.4" 0.0 iPlay 40 GHz hexa-core ARM Cortex-A55 Mali-G52 MP2 MT6771 Up to 2.0 GHz quad- Chuwi core ARM Cortex-A73 37 639 10.1" 0.0 SurPad & 2.0 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 Mali-G72 MP3 MT6771 Up to 2.0 GHz quad- Teclast core ARM Cortex-A73 38 638 10.1" 0.0 M30 Pro & 2.0 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 Mali-G72 MP3 MT6771 Up to 2.0 GHz quad- Chuwi core ARM Cortex-A73 39 516 10.1" 0.0 HiPad X & 2.0 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 Mali-G72 MP3 Tiger T610 Up to 1.8 GHz dual-core General ARM Cortex-A75 & 1.8 40 Mobile E- 488 10.1" 0.0 GHz hexa-core ARM Tab 20 Cortex-A55 Mali-G52 MP2 Snapdragon 670 Samsung Up to 2.0 GHz dual-core 41 Galaxy 475 10.5" Kryo 360 & 1.7 GHz 0.1 Tab S5e hexa-core Kryo 360 Adreno 615 Snapdragon 710 Samsung Up to 2.2 GHz dual-core Galaxy 42 472 10.1" Kryo 360 & 1.7 GHz 0.0 Tab hexa-core Kryo 360 Active Pro Adreno 616 Snapdragon 660 (MSM8976 Plus) Up to 2.2 GHz quad- Xiaomi 43 373 8" core ARM Kryo 260 & 0.0 Mi Pad 4 1.84 GHz quad-core Kryo 260 Adreno 512 https://benchmarks.ul.com/compare/best-tablets 6/7 24.06.2021 Best Tablets - June 2021 Rank Device Performance Screen Hardware Popularity Snapdragon 662 Samsung Up to 2.0 GHz quad- Galaxy core Kryo 260 Gold & 44 Tab A7 373 10.4" 0.1 1.8 GHz quad-core Kryo 10.4 260 Silver (2020) Adreno 610 Snapdragon 662 Up to 2.0 GHz quad- Lenovo core Kryo 260 Gold & 45 373 11" 0.0 Tab P11 1.8 GHz quad-core Kryo 260 Silver Adreno 610 Last updated: 2021-06-19 https://benchmarks.ul.com/compare/best-tablets 7/7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GPU Developments 2018
    GPU Developments 2018 2018 GPU Developments 2018 © Copyright Jon Peddie Research 2019. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without written permission from Jon Peddie Research. This report is the property of Jon Peddie Research (JPR) and made available to a restricted number of clients only upon these terms and conditions. Agreement not to copy or disclose. This report and all future reports or other materials provided by JPR pursuant to this subscription (collectively, “Reports”) are protected by: (i) federal copyright, pursuant to the Copyright Act of 1976; and (ii) the nondisclosure provisions set forth immediately following. License, exclusive use, and agreement not to disclose. Reports are the trade secret property exclusively of JPR and are made available to a restricted number of clients, for their exclusive use and only upon the following terms and conditions. JPR grants site-wide license to read and utilize the information in the Reports, exclusively to the initial subscriber to the Reports, its subsidiaries, divisions, and employees (collectively, “Subscriber”). The Reports shall, at all times, be treated by Subscriber as proprietary and confidential documents, for internal use only. Subscriber agrees that it will not reproduce for or share any of the material in the Reports (“Material”) with any entity or individual other than Subscriber (“Shared Third Party”) (collectively, “Share” or “Sharing”), without the advance written permission of JPR. Subscriber shall be liable for any breach of this agreement and shall be subject to cancellation of its subscription to Reports. Without limiting this liability, Subscriber shall be liable for any damages suffered by JPR as a result of any Sharing of any Material, without advance written permission of JPR.
    [Show full text]
  • SMART MOVEMENT DETECTION for ANDROID PHONES a Degree Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Escola Tècnica D'enginyeria De Tele
    SMART MOVEMENT DETECTION FOR ANDROID PHONES A Degree Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Escola Tècnica d'Enginyeria de Telecomunicació de Barcelona Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya by Pablo Navarro Morales In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree in TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING Advisor: Sergio Bermejo Barcelona, October 2016 Abstract This project describes a decision tree based pedometer algorithm and its implementation on Android using machine learning techniques. The pedometer can count steps accurately and It can discard irrelevant motion. The overall classification accuracy is 89.4%. Accelerometer, gyroscope and magnetic field sensors are used in the device. When user puts his smartphone into the pocket, the pedometer can automatically count steps. A filter is used to map the acceleration from mobile phone’s reference frame to the direction of gravity. As a result of this project, an android application has been developed that, using the built-in sensors to measure motion and orientation, implements a decision tree based algorithm for counting steps. 2 Resumen Este proyecto describe un algoritmo para un podómetro basado en un árbol de decisiones y su aplicación en Android utilizando técnicas de aprendizaje automático. El podómetro puede contar los pasos con precisión y se puede descartar el movimiento irrelevante. La precisión de la clasificación general es del 89,4%. Un acelerómetro, un giroscopio y un sensor de campo magnético se utilizan en el dispositivo. Cuando el usuario pone su teléfono en el bolsillo, el podómetro puede contar automáticamente pasos. Un filtro se utiliza para asignar la aceleración del sistema de referencia de teléfono móvil a la dirección de la gravedad.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey and Benchmarking of Machine Learning Accelerators
    1 Survey and Benchmarking of Machine Learning Accelerators Albert Reuther, Peter Michaleas, Michael Jones, Vijay Gadepally, Siddharth Samsi, and Jeremy Kepner MIT Lincoln Laboratory Supercomputing Center Lexington, MA, USA freuther,pmichaleas,michael.jones,vijayg,sid,[email protected] Abstract—Advances in multicore processors and accelerators components play a major role in the success or failure of an have opened the flood gates to greater exploration and application AI system. of machine learning techniques to a variety of applications. These advances, along with breakdowns of several trends including Moore’s Law, have prompted an explosion of processors and accelerators that promise even greater computational and ma- chine learning capabilities. These processors and accelerators are coming in many forms, from CPUs and GPUs to ASICs, FPGAs, and dataflow accelerators. This paper surveys the current state of these processors and accelerators that have been publicly announced with performance and power consumption numbers. The performance and power values are plotted on a scatter graph and a number of dimensions and observations from the trends on this plot are discussed and analyzed. For instance, there are interesting trends in the plot regarding power consumption, numerical precision, and inference versus training. We then select and benchmark two commercially- available low size, weight, and power (SWaP) accelerators as these processors are the most interesting for embedded and Fig. 1. Canonical AI architecture consists of sensors, data conditioning, mobile machine learning inference applications that are most algorithms, modern computing, robust AI, human-machine teaming, and users (missions). Each step is critical in developing end-to-end AI applications and applicable to the DoD and other SWaP constrained users.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensors and Data Encryption, Two Aspects of Electronics That Used to Be Two Worlds Apart and That Are Now Often Tightly Integrated, One Relying on the Other
    www.eenewseurope.com January 2019 electronics europe News News e-skin beats human touch Swedish startup beats e-Ink on low-power Special Focus: Power Sources european business press November 2011 Electronic Engineering Times Europe1 181231_8-3_Mill_EENE_EU_Snipe.indd 1 12/14/18 3:59 PM 181231_QualR_EENE_EU.indd 1 12/14/18 3:53 PM CONTENTS JANUARY 2019 Dear readers, www.eenewseurope.com January 2019 The Consumer Electronics Show has just closed its doors in Las Vegas, yet the show has opened the mind of many designers, some returning home with new electronics europe News News ideas and possibly new companies to be founded. All the electronic devices unveiled at CES share in common the need for a cheap power source and a lot of research goes into making power sources more sus- tainable. While lithium-ion batteries are commercially mature, their long-term viability is often questioned and new battery chemistries are being investigated for their simpler material sourcing, lower cost and sometime increased energy density. Energy harvesting is another feature that is more and more often inte- e-skin beats human touch grated into wearables but also at grid-level. Our Power Sources feature will give you a market insight and reviews some of the latest findings. Other topics covered in our January edition are Sensors and Data Encryption, two aspects of electronics that used to be two worlds apart and that are now often tightly integrated, one relying on the other. Swedish startup beats e-Ink on low-power With this first edition of 2019, let me wish you all an excellent year and plenty Special Focus: Power Sources of new business opportunities, whether you are designing the future for a european business press startup or working for a well-established company.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardware-Assisted Rootkits: Abusing Performance Counters on the ARM and X86 Architectures
    Hardware-Assisted Rootkits: Abusing Performance Counters on the ARM and x86 Architectures Matt Spisak Endgame, Inc. [email protected] Abstract the OS. With KPP in place, attackers are often forced to move malicious code to less privileged user-mode, to ele- In this paper, a novel hardware-assisted rootkit is intro- vate privileges enabling a hypervisor or TrustZone based duced, which leverages the performance monitoring unit rootkit, or to become more creative in their approach to (PMU) of a CPU. By configuring hardware performance achieving a kernel mode rootkit. counters to count specific architectural events, this re- Early advances in rootkit design focused on low-level search effort proves it is possible to transparently trap hooks to system calls and interrupts within the kernel. system calls and other interrupts driven entirely by the With the introduction of hardware virtualization exten- PMU. This offers an attacker the opportunity to redirect sions, hypervisor based rootkits became a popular area control flow to malicious code without requiring modifi- of study allowing malicious code to run underneath a cations to a kernel image. guest operating system [4, 5]. Another class of OS ag- The approach is demonstrated as a kernel-mode nostic rootkits also emerged that run in System Manage- rootkit on both the ARM and Intel x86-64 architectures ment Mode (SMM) on x86 [6] or within ARM Trust- that is capable of intercepting system calls while evad- Zone [7]. The latter two categories, which leverage vir- ing current kernel patch protection implementations such tualization extensions, SMM on x86, and security exten- as PatchGuard.
    [Show full text]
  • Zacks Equity Research Zacks Equity Research
    September 3, 2019 Zacks Equity Research Zacks Equity Research www.zacks.com 10 S. Riverside Plaza, Suite 1600 - Chicago, Il 60606 Industry Outlook The Zacks Computer – Mini Computers industry comprises prominent companies like Apple (AAPL) and HP (HPQ) that offer devices including smartphones, desktops, laptops, printers, wearables and 3-D printers. Such devices primarily adopt a multi-operating system, multi-architecture strategies using Apple’s iOS, MacOS, Microsoft Windows, Google Chrome and Android operating systems. They predominantly use processors from Apple, Intel (INTC), AMD, Qualcomm (QCOM ), NVIDIA (NVDA), Samsung, Broadcom and MediaTek, among others. Here are the four major industry themes: Expanding screen size, better display and enhanced storage capabilities have been key catalysts driving rapid proliferation of smartphones. This has been well-supported by faster mobile processors from the likes of Qualcomm (Snapdragon-brand), NVIDIA (Tegra X1), Apple (A12 Bionic) and Samsung (Exynos 9609). Moreover, improved Internet penetration and speed along with evolution of mobile apps have made smartphones indispensable for consumers. Further, the improved graphics quality is making smartphones suitable for playing games like PUBG and Fortnite. This is expected to boost demand for high-end smartphones which open up significant opportunities for device makers. Personal computers (desktops and laptops), be it Windows or Apple’s MacOS-based, have been facing the risk of extinction due to rapid proliferation of smartphones and tablets. Shipment of Personal Computers (PCs) has also suffered due to inventory constraints of Intel’s CPU. Stiff competition from smartphones has compelled global PC makers to not only upgrade hardware frequently but also add apps and cloud-based services to attract consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipad Pro 11" Teardown Guide ID: 115457 - Draft: 2021-04-21
    iPad Pro 11" Teardown Guide ID: 115457 - Draft: 2021-04-21 iPad Pro 11" Teardown Teardown of the iPad Pro 11", performed on November 9, 2018. Written By: Arthur Shi This document was generated on 2021-04-24 06:01:10 AM (MST). © iFixit — CC BY-NC-SA www.iFixit.com Page 1 of 24 iPad Pro 11" Teardown Guide ID: 115457 - Draft: 2021-04-21 INTRODUCTION The new iPad Pro 11” sports narrower bezels, curvy LCD corners, and cutting edge silicon. This is apparently the iPad Apple dreamed about building from the very beginning, but what we dream about is a device that is easy to repair. Will this iPad fulfill both dreams, or will ours be left in the pipe? There’s only one way to tell—with a teardown! Catch our Tweets, or drift through our Facebook and Instagram pages to keep up with the latest Teardown news! TOOLS: iOpener (1) Suction Handle (1) Phillips #00 Screwdriver (1) T3 Torx Screwdriver (1) iFixit Opening Picks set of 6 (1) Tweezers (1) Rotary Tool (1) Spudger (1) This document was generated on 2021-04-24 06:01:10 AM (MST). © iFixit — CC BY-NC-SA www.iFixit.com Page 2 of 24 iPad Pro 11" Teardown Guide ID: 115457 - Draft: 2021-04-21 Step 1 — iPad Pro 11" Teardown Let's take a look at what sets this Pro iPad apart from its amateur peers: Fully laminated, 11", LED-backlit, Oxide TFT Liquid Retina display with 2388 × 1668 resolution (264 ppi), featuring ProMotion Technology Octa-core Apple A12X Bionic custom processor, with M12 motion coprocessor and integrated 7- core GPU 12 MP rear camera with 4K video recording at 60 fps, and 7 MP TrueDepth camera with 1080p video Self-balancing, four-speaker audio Face ID, five microphones, ambient light sensor, accelerometer, barometer, and 3-axis gyro 802.11a/b​ /g​ /n​ /a​ c dual band MIMO Wi-Fi + Bluetooth 5.0 64 GB, 256 GB, 512 GB, or 1 TB of on-board storage This document was generated on 2021-04-24 06:01:10 AM (MST).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1910.06663V1 [Cs.PF] 15 Oct 2019
    AI Benchmark: All About Deep Learning on Smartphones in 2019 Andrey Ignatov Radu Timofte Andrei Kulik ETH Zurich ETH Zurich Google Research [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Seungsoo Yang Ke Wang Felix Baum Max Wu Samsung, Inc. Huawei, Inc. Qualcomm, Inc. MediaTek, Inc. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Lirong Xu Luc Van Gool∗ Unisoc, Inc. ETH Zurich [email protected] [email protected] Abstract compact models as they were running at best on devices with a single-core 600 MHz Arm CPU and 8-128 MB of The performance of mobile AI accelerators has been evolv- RAM. The situation changed after 2010, when mobile de- ing rapidly in the past two years, nearly doubling with each vices started to get multi-core processors, as well as power- new generation of SoCs. The current 4th generation of mo- ful GPUs, DSPs and NPUs, well suitable for machine and bile NPUs is already approaching the results of CUDA- deep learning tasks. At the same time, there was a fast de- compatible Nvidia graphics cards presented not long ago, velopment of the deep learning field, with numerous novel which together with the increased capabilities of mobile approaches and models that were achieving a fundamentally deep learning frameworks makes it possible to run com- new level of performance for many practical tasks, such as plex and deep AI models on mobile devices. In this pa- image classification, photo and speech processing, neural per, we evaluate the performance and compare the results of language understanding, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Sigurnost Apple Platforme Proljeće 2020
    Sigurnost Apple platforme Proljeće 2020. Sadržaj Uvod u sigurnost Apple platforme 5 Obveza za sigurnost 6 Sigurnost hardvera i biometrija 8 Pregled sigurnosti hardvera 8 Secure Enclave 9 Dedicirani AES modul 10 Touch ID i Face ID 12 Hardversko isključivanje mikrofona u Macu i iPadu 17 Express Card kartice sa štednjom energije u iPhoneu 17 Sigurnost sustava 18 Pregled sigurnosti sustava 18 Generiranje nasumičnih brojeva 18 Sigurno podizanje sustava 19 Sigurnosna ažuriranja softvera 28 Integritet sustava OS u sustavu iOS i iPadOS 29 Integritet sustava OS u sustavu macOS 31 Sigurnost sustava watchOS 37 Enkripcija i zaštita podataka 40 Pregled enkripcije i zaštite podataka 40 Kako Apple štiti osobne podatke korisnika 40 Uloga Apple sustava datoteka 41 Zaštita podataka u sustavu iOS i iPadOS 42 Enkripcija u sustavu macOS 48 Šifre i lozinke 54 Autentikacija i digitalno potpisivanje 56 Zbirke ključeva 58 Sigurnost Apple platforme 2 Sigurnost aplikacija 61 Pregled sigurnosti aplikacija 61 Sigurnost aplikacija u sustavu iOS i iPadOS 62 Sigurnost aplikacija u sustavu macOS 67 Sigurnosne značajke u aplikaciji Bilješke 70 Sigurnosne značajke u aplikaciji Prečaci 71 Sigurnost usluga 72 Pregled sigurnosti usluga 72 Apple ID i Upravljani Apple ID 72 iCloud 74 Upravljanje šiframa i lozinkama 78 Apple Pay 85 iMessage 97 Dopisivanje s poduzećem 100 FaceTime 101 Pronalaženje 101 Kontinuitet 105 Sigurnost mreže 109 Pregled sigurnosti mreže 109 Sigurnost TLS mreže 109 Virtualne privatne mreže (VPN-ovi) 110 Sigurnost Wi-Fi mreže 111 Sigurnost Bluetootha 114
    [Show full text]
  • Gables: a Roofline Model for Mobile Socs
    2019 IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) Gables: A Roofline Model for Mobile SoCs Mark D. Hill∗ Vijay Janapa Reddi∗ Computer Sciences Department School Of Engineering And Applied Sciences University of Wisconsin—Madison Harvard University [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Over a billion mobile consumer system-on-chip systems with multiple cores, GPUs, and many accelerators— (SoC) chipsets ship each year. Of these, the mobile consumer often called intellectual property (IP) blocks, driven by the market undoubtedly involving smartphones has a significant need for performance. These cores and IPs interact via rich market share. Most modern smartphones comprise of advanced interconnection networks, caches, coherence, 64-bit address SoC architectures that are made up of multiple cores, GPS, and many different programmable and fixed-function accelerators spaces, virtual memory, and virtualization. Therefore, con- connected via a complex hierarchy of interconnects with the goal sumer SoCs deserve the architecture community’s attention. of running a dozen or more critical software usecases under strict Consumer SoCs have long thrived on tight integration and power, thermal and energy constraints. The steadily growing extreme heterogeneity, driven by the need for high perfor- complexity of a modern SoC challenges hardware computer mance in severely constrained battery and thermal power architects on how best to do early stage ideation. Late SoC design typically relies on detailed full-system simulation once envelopes, and all-day battery life. A typical mobile SoC in- the hardware is specified and accelerator software is written cludes a camera image signal processor (ISP) for high-frame- or ported.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipad Pro Just Might Replace Your Laptop 21 January 2016, by Jim Rossman, the Dallas Morning News
    Review: IPad Pro just might replace your laptop 21 January 2016, by Jim Rossman, The Dallas Morning News For the first time, Apple made an iPad with a bigger screen. It also introduced a few accessories, like the Apple Pencil and the keyboard cover, that make it even more compelling. Would this be the model to replace my MacBook Pro? BIG SCREEN I'm still making that decision, but let me tell you how it's going so far. The first thing you'll notice about the iPad Pro is its 12.9-inch screen. This is an iPad on steroids. Every time a new iPad is introduced, I have the same conversation with myself. Apple sells laptops with similarly sized screens. "Maybe this one will replace my laptop," I muse. My own iPad is a 7.9-inch iPad mini, so stepping up almost 5 inches in screen size feels quite But alas, each time I've been disappointed. luxurious. "Not yet," I mutter. "Maybe someday." The iPad Pro's screen has a resolution of 2,732 by 2,048 pixels (264 pixels per inch). Third-party keyboard cases do a good job at helping the iPad look like a laptop, but a few basic It runs Apple's A9X processor and has 4 gigabytes things keep me from my dream. of RAM. For my writing, I need a comfortable keyboard, a You can configure the iPad Pro with 32 or 128 decently fast processor and screen, and a way to gigabytes of internal storage. Pricing is $799 for the easily move, copy, and paste among my writing 32GB model and $949 for 128GB.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Ipad Pro Wi-Fi Cellular 12.9" 512GB Sølv Apple Ios 12 Beskrivelse Apple 12.9-Inch Ipad Pro Wi-Fi + Cellular - 3
    Apple iPad Pro Wi-Fi Cellular 12.9" 512GB Sølv Apple iOS 12 Beskrivelse Apple 12.9-inch iPad Pro Wi-Fi + Cellular - 3. generation - tablet - 512 GB - 12.9" IPS (2732 x 2048) - 4G - LTE - sølv Features Passer til selv dine allerstørste idéer Med sin Retina-skærm på 5,6 millioner pixels er iPad Pro den iOS-enhed, der har den højeste skærmopløsning. Den 12,9" store skærm gør alt, hvad du gør - redigering af 4K-video, design af præsentationer, drift af en virksomhed - lettere, hurtigere og mere involverende. Og Multi-Touch- undersystemet har fået nyt design, som giver dig flere måder at interagere med iPad på. Apples stærkeste iPad Kernen i iPad Pro er den nye A9X, Apples tredjegenerationsprocessor, der har 64-bit-arkitektur som på stationære computere. Den sikrer op til 1,8 gange hurtigere CPU-ydelse og leverer dobbelt så stor grafisk ydeevne som iPad Air 2. Så selv de mest krævende apps kører uden problemer. Oplevelsen bliver bedre for hvert tryk iOS 9 er verdens mest intuitive, avancerede og sikre mobile styresystem. Det hjælper dig til at blive mere produktiv og kreativ takket være de nye funktioner, som udnytter iPad Pro's store ydeevne fuldt ud. Multitasking gør det nemt at have to apps kørende på samme tid. Og iPad kan bruges til endnu mere takket være forbedrede funktioner på tværs af systemet som f.eks. Siri og Spotlight-søgning. Hvis det føles, som om iOS 9 og iPad Pro er designet til at arbejde sammen, så er der noget om snakken. Det er de nemlig.
    [Show full text]