Shellfish Management Plan OCTOBER 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shellfish Management Plan OCTOBER 2012 Nantucket Shellfish Management Plan OCTOBER 2012 This Shellfish Plan was developed by the Nantucket Shellfish Management Plan Committee: Matthew Herr (Chair), Nantucket Fisherman Frank Dutra (Vice Chair), Nantucket Shellfish Association Tara Riley (Secretary), Department of Marine and Coastal Resources Sarah Oktay, University of Massachusetts Boston Field Station Peter Boyce, Maria Mitchell Association, Harbor and Shellfish Advisory Board Doug Smith, Harbor and Shellfish Advisory Board Carl Sjolund, Nantucket Shellfish Association Jake Kritzer, Environmental Defense Fund Cormac Collier, Nantucket Land Council Dave Fronzuto, Department of Marine and Coastal Resources With Assistance from: Kristin Uiterwyk, Urban Harbors Institute, University of Massachusetts Boston Jack Wiggin, Urban Harbors Institute, University of Massachusetts Boston Dale Leavitt, Department of Biology and Marine Biology, Roger Williams University Steve Bliven, Urban Harbors Institute, University of Massachusetts Boston Allison Novelly, Urban Harbors Institute, University of Massachusetts Boston Dan Hellin, Urban Harbors Institute, University of Massachusetts Boston Cover Images (left to right): Bay scallops being grown out at the Brant Point facility; Bay scallop boat tied up at the dock; Sign outside the Summer Shack restaurant in Hingham, MA Shellfish Management Plan, October 2012 Page i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Management Plan was produced with support from the Nantucket Shellfish Association, the Nancy Sayles Day Foundation, the Environmental Defense Fund, the Nantucket Land Council, and the Town of Nantucket. Many Nantucket shellfishermen and wholesalers participated in interviews during the development of this Shellfish Management Plan. We are grateful for their time and candidness. We would also like to express our gratitude to Whiting "Whitey" Willauer for his thoughtful contributions, unflagging enthusiasm, and support for the planning process. Lastly, we also thank the outside reviewers who provided insightful feedback on the first draft of this Plan: Carl LoBue, Senior Marine Scientist, The Nature Conservancy; Stephen Tettelbach, PhD, Professor, Long Island University; Kenneth J. La Valley, PhD, Associate Director, NH Sea Grant. Shellfish Management Plan, October 2012 Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 Section 2: Purpose, Scope, Planning Process, and Larger Context ............................................................... 6 Section 3: General Characterization of Nantucket and its Shellfishing Resources ....................................... 9 Section 4: Characterization of the Harbors’ Environments and Habitats ................................................... 11 Section 5: Description of the Resources Harvested and their Habitats ...................................................... 25 Section 6: History and description of Nantucket shellfishing ..................................................................... 34 Section 7: Aquaculture, Propagation, and Seed Management Activities on Nantucket ............................ 54 Section 8: Other Marine Resource Uses ..................................................................................................... 65 Section 9: Other Programs Related to Shellfish Management on Nantucket ............................................ 69 Section 10: Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 77 Section 11: Adaptation of the Shellfish Management Plan ...................................................................... 108 Section 12: Research Plan ......................................................................................................................... 110 Appendix A: Matrix of Recommendations ............................................................................................... 125 Appendix B: Resources .............................................................................................................................. 155 Appendix C: List of Committee Members ................................................................................................. 160 Appendix D: List of Committee and Public Meetings .............................................................................. 161 Appendix E: List of recommendations considered but not included in this Plan ..................................... 162 Appendix F: Examples of Traffic Light Control Rules in Data‐Poor Fisheries ............................................ 166 Appendix G: Considerations for Developing a Marketing Collaborative .................................................. 172 Appendix H: Seafood Branding and Marketing Initiatives ........................................................................ 177 Appendix I: Memo of harvesting criteria ................................................................................................ 185 Shellfish Management Plan, October 2012 Page iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Nantucket’s shellfisheries are significant both locally and nationally. Locally, commercial and recreational shellfishing are critical to the Island’s history, culture, and economy. Nationally, the Island’s largest commercial shellfishery— the Nantucket bay scallop fishery—is one of the last wild‐harvest bay scallop fisheries in the country, but there is growing concern over the health of the overall population and the sustainability of the fishery. Given the importance of the shellfisheries on Nantucket and the drastic decline of bay scallop populations elsewhere along the Atlantic coast, there is a compelling interest in ensuring that the Town’s shellfish are managed to sustain both the shellfishing industry and the resources. This is the first official management plan for commercially and recreationally harvested shellfish in Nantucket waters. The Plan addresses bay scallops, quahogs, oysters, mussels, soft‐shell clams, and conchs. A Shellfish Management Plan Committee, consisting of researchers, managers, and fishermen, met regularly for more than a year to discuss issues, research, management strategies, and recommendations. They focused on ensuring that this Plan would be developed by and for stakeholders, with specific attention paid to (1) the biology of the shellfish resources, (2) the interactions within the surrounding ecosystem, (3) the needs and interests of the shellfishing industry, and (4) the cultural and economic attributes of the Island. Together the Committee identified the following goals for this Plan: The shellfish resources of Nantucket should be managed to support a viable and continuing shellfishery for both economic and traditional purposes by: Maintaining or improving the habitat associated with a healthy shellfish fishery, and Maintaining or enhancing the populations and health of scallops, quahogs, soft shell clams, mussels, conchs, and any other shellfish of commercial and/or recreational importance in Nantucket waters. The breadth of this Plan is reflective of the variety of issues affecting the resources and, as a first iteration of a living document, the Plan is designed to (1) provide a solid foundation of background information relevant to shellfish management on Nantucket, (2) provide a means for updating and adapting its content on both an as‐needed and a regular, three‐year basis, and (3) capture a broad range of issues and consider a wide range of needs and possibilities. Sections 1–9 of the Plan provide background information about Nantucket’s marine habitat, shellfish, and the fisheries they support. Section 10 contains goals, objectives, and recommendations for improved management. Section 11 describes the process to adapt the Plan as needed. Section 12 outlines a Research Plan to support better management. When taken together, Sections 10–12 comprise the actions to be taken to achieve the Plan’s goals for the shellfisheries. The goals, objectives, and recommendations contained in this Plan are numerous and diverse, covering topics such as habitat management, shellfish resources, regulations, management implementation, education, harvest documentation, support of the commercial fishery, and plan adaptation. Accompanying each recommendation is a list of organizations charged with implementing the recommendation, along with a lead organization. Examples of some of the goals found in this Plan include: Shellfish Management Plan, October 2012 Page 1 Maintain and improve the habitat associated with sustainable commercial and recreational shellfish fisheries Conduct predator management activities Ensure adaptive management of shellfish resources Increase public education/outreach efforts to create a better understanding of how human activities affect important shellfish resources Given the significant need for more scientific information about the Island’s shellfish resources and associated habitats and fisheries, the Plan’s management and research recommendations are comprehensive and long‐term. As was done with the Nantucket Harbors Action Plan, the committee charged with implementation of the Shellfish Management Plan will prioritize the actions based on importance, available resources, feasibility, and other criteria as deemed appropriate.
Recommended publications
  • On the Half Shell Shellfish Caviar Service
    ON ICE Cold CAVIAR PUFF* 1/8 OZ ..........................................8.00/EA On the Half Shell PADDLEFISH CAVIAR, CULTURED CREAM, POTATO, CHIVES WITH COCKTAIL SAUCE, SHALLOT SAUCE & LEMON SC YELLOW SQUASH ............................................... 10.00 DAILY OYSTER FIX* 1/2 DOZEN ............................... 17.00 LEMON VERJUS, HAZELNUT, CURED EGG YOLK WITH SMOKED DULSE CHIMICHURRI OCTOPUS ESCABECHE* .......................................... 15.00 TODAY’S FEATURES SALINITY SIZE PER CALABRIAN CHILIES, SQUID INK CHICHARRON, OLIVES AFTERNOON DELIGHTS, RI* MED MED 2.75 MARK’S RED SNAPPER CEVICHE* ............................. 14.00 LECHE DE TIGRE, CILANTRO OUTLAWS, FL* HIGH MED 3.00 SMOKED FISH DIP ................................................. 14.00 LOW CO. CUPS, SC* HIGH MED 3.00 EVERYTHING CRACKERS, CHIVES, ORANGE ZEST STONES BAY, NC* MED MED 2.75 ROYAL RED SHRIMP GAZPACHO ............................... 13.00 WELLFLEETS, MA* MED MED 3.00 BRIOCHE, CUCUMBER DUKES OF TOPSAIL, NC* HIGH MED 3.00 SEASONAL GREENS ................................................ 12.00 GREEN GODDESS, SC PEARS, PEANUTS LITTLENECK CLAMS,VA HIGH SM 1.25 ADD SHRIMP OR CRABMEAT +8.00 Shellfish NOt Cold WITH ACCOMPANIMENTS GRILLED OYSTERS ................................................ 20.00 BLUE CRAB CLAWS, NC 1/4 LB .................................. 12.00 UNI BUTTER, PERSILLADE, BLACK LIME MOJO SAUCE, ALEPPO SALTED FISH BEIGNETS .......................................... 14.00 * KOMBU POACHED LOBSTER, ME 1/2 LB ..................... 21.00 THYME,
    [Show full text]
  • Environment for Development Improving Utilization of the Queen
    Environment for Development Discussion Paper Series December 2020 ◼ EfD DP 20-39 Improving Utilization of the Queen Conch (Aliger Gigas) Resource in the Colombian Caribbean A Bioeconomic Model of Rotational Harvesting Jorge Marco, Diego Valderrama, Mario Rueda, and Maykol R o dr i g ue z - P r i et o Discussion papers are research materials circulated by their authors for purposes of information and discussion. They have not necessarily undergone formal peer review. Central America Chile China Research Program in Economics and Research Nucleus on Environmental and Environmental Economics Program in China Environment for Development in Central Natural Resource Economics (NENRE) (EEPC) America Tropical Agricultural Research and Universidad de Concepción Peking University Higher Education Center (CATIE) Colombia Ghana The Research Group on Environmental, Ethiopia The Environment and Natural Resource Natural Resource and Applied Economics Environment and Climate Research Center Research Unit, Institute of Statistical, Social Studies (REES-CEDE), Universidad de los (ECRC), Policy Studies Institute, Addis and Economic Research, University of Andes, Colombia Ababa, Ethiopia Ghana, Accra India Kenya Nigeria Centre for Research on the Economics of School of Economics Resource and Environmental Policy Climate, Food, Energy, and Environment, University of Nairobi Research Centre, University of Nigeria, (CECFEE), at Indian Statistical Institute, Nsukka New Delhi, India South Africa Tanzania Sweden Environmental Economics Policy Research Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Shellfishshellfish Recommendations for Responsible Aquaculture
    SustainableSustainable ShellfishShellfish Recommendations for responsible aquaculture By Heather Deal, M.Sc. As Sustainable Shellfish went to press, the B.C. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries (MAFF) pulled their draft Code of Practice for Shellfish Aquaculture from circulation. This document, upon which much of Sustainable Shellfish is based, was one component in guiding, monitoring, and reg- ulating B.C.’s rapidly growing shellfish industry. The Code was by no means exhaustive – Sustainable Shellfish aims to address its gaps and limitations, including its lack of con- sideration for stringent environmental safeguards on the expanding industry. Now that the Code of Practice has been abandoned by gov- ernment, the shellfish industry is managed via complaints to the Farm Industry Review Board. This board uses "normal farm practices" as a standard, but does not and, according to MAFF, will not define what "normal farm practices" are with regard to aquaculture. In other words, although there is leg- islation in place, there are no longer governmental stan- dards or guidelines specific to this industry. The BC Shellfish Growers Association (BCSGA) does have an Environmental Management System and Code of Practice, which is very similar to that which MAFF pro- duced. The BCSGA Code is not available on their website, so please contact the association directly to request a copy: #7 - 140 Wallace Street Nanaimo, BC V9R 5B1 Tel: (250) 714-0804 Fax: (250) 714-0805 Email: [email protected] The draft government Code of Practice is still available on the David Suzuki Foundation website, www.davidsuzuki.org/oceans. Sustainable Shellfish, used in conjunction with the non- operational Code offers a way forward towards a low impact industry with minimal harmful effects on B.C.’s marine environment and coastal communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Size at Maturation, Spawning Variability and Fecundity in the Queen Conch, Aliger Gigas
    Gulf and Caribbean Research Volume 31 Issue 1 2020 Size at Maturation, Spawning Variability and Fecundity in the Queen Conch, Aliger gigas Richard S. Appeldoorn GCFIMembers, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Population Biology Commons To access the supplemental data associated with this article, CLICK HERE. Recommended Citation Appeldoorn, R. S. 2020. Size at Maturation, Spawning Variability and Fecundity in the Queen Conch, Aliger gigas. Gulf and Caribbean Research 31 (1): GCFI 10-GCFI 19. Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol31/iss1/11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.3101.11 This Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute Partnership is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf and Caribbean Research by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOLUME 25 VOLUME GULF AND CARIBBEAN Volume 25 RESEARCH March 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS GULF AND CARIBBEAN SAND BOTTOM MICROALGAL PRODUCTION AND BENTHIC NUTRIENT FLUXES ON THE NORTHEASTERN GULF OF MEXICO NEARSHORE SHELF RESEARCH Jeffrey G. Allison, M. E. Wagner, M. McAllister, A. K. J. Ren, and R. A. Snyder....................................................................................1—8 WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT SPECIES RICHNESS AND DISTRIBUTION ON THE OUTER—SHELF SOUTH TEXAS BANKS? Harriet L. Nash, Sharon J. Furiness, and John W. Tunnell, Jr. ......................................................................................................... 9—18 Volume 31 ASSESSMENT OF SEAGRASS FLORAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE FROM TWO CARIBBEAN MARINE PROTECTED 2020 AREAS ISSN: 2572-1410 Paul A.
    [Show full text]
  • OHA Issues Advisory for Softshell Clams Along Oregon Coast Removing Skin from Clam’S Siphon Dramatically Reduces Arsenic Levels, Public Health Officials Say
    EDITORS: Oregon Public Health Division staff members will be available for interviews from 4 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. TODAY (July 13) in Room 1-A (first floor), Portland State Office Building, 800 NE Oregon St. July 13, 2015 Media contact: Jonathan Modie, 971-246-9139, [email protected] OHA issues advisory for softshell clams along Oregon Coast Removing skin from clam’s siphon dramatically reduces arsenic levels, public health officials say The Oregon Health Authority is issuing a health advisory for the length of the Oregon Coast for softshell clams because they contain high levels of naturally occurring arsenic. The advisory is most important for people who dig their own clams and target the specific species Mya arenaria, since these clams are not commercially available in markets or restaurants. The advisory, issued today by the OHA Public Health Division, recommends removing the skin from the siphon, or “neck,” of softshell clams before eating them. Softshell clams are found primarily in estuary and intertidal regions of the Oregon coast. This advisory stems from tests the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality performed on a variety of shellfish species collected along the Oregon coast as part of its Water Quality Toxics Monitoring Program. DEQ’s tests found that when analyzed whole without the shell, softshell clams contained unusually high levels of inorganic arsenic. Most of the arsenic was concentrated in the skin covering the clam’s siphon. Researchers found that by removing the skin covering the siphon before eating, the arsenic can be greatly reduced, to levels that are not harmful.
    [Show full text]
  • Timing of Shell Ring Formation and Patterns of Shell Growth in the Sea Scallop Placopecten Magellanicus Based on Stable Oxygen Isotopes Author(S): Antonie S
    Timing of Shell Ring Formation and Patterns of Shell Growth in the Sea Scallop Placopecten Magellanicus Based on Stable Oxygen Isotopes Author(s): Antonie S. Chute, Sam C. Wainright and Deborah R. Hart Source: Journal of Shellfish Research, 31(3):649-662. 2012. Published By: National Shellfisheries Association DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2983/035.031.0308 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2983/035.031.0308 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, 649–662, 2012. TIMING OF SHELL RING FORMATION AND PATTERNS OF SHELL GROWTH IN THE SEA SCALLOP PLACOPECTEN MAGELLANICUS BASED ON STABLE OXYGEN ISOTOPES ANTONIE S. CHUTE,1* SAM C. WAINRIGHT2 AND DEBORAH R. HART1 1Northeast Fisheries Science Center, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543; 2Department of Science, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Ocean Wise Approved Canadian MSC Fisheries
    Current Ocean Wise approved Canadian MSC Fisheries Updated: November 14, 2017 Legend: Blue - Ocean Wise Red - Not Ocean Wise White - Only specific areas or gear types are Ocean Wise Species Common Name Latin Name MSC Fishery Name Gear Location Reason for Exception Clam Clearwater Seafoods Banquereau and Banquereau Bank Artic surf clam Mactromeris polynyma Grand Banks Arctic surf clam Hydraulic dredges Grand Banks Crab Snow Crab Chionoecetes opilio Gulf of St Lawrence snow crab trap Conical or rectangular crab pots (traps) North West Atlantic - Nova Scotia Snow Crab Chionoecetes opilio Scotian shelf snow crab trap Conical or rectangular crab pots (traps) North West Atlantic - Nova Scotia Snow Crab Chionoecetes opilio Newfoundland & Labrador snow crab Pots Newfoundland & Labrador Flounder/Sole Yellowtail flounder Limanda ferruginea OCI Grand Bank yellowtail flounder trawl Demersal trawl Grand Banks Haddock Trawl Bottom longline Gillnet Hook and Line CAN - Scotian shelf 4X5Y Trawl Bottom longline Gillnet Atlantic haddock Melangrammus aeglefinus Canada Scotia-Fundy haddock Hook and Line CAN - Scotian shelf 5Zjm Hake Washington, Oregon and California North Pacific hake Merluccius productus Pacific hake mid-water trawl Mid-water Trawl British Columbia Halibut Pacific Halibut Hippoglossus stenolepis Canada Pacific halibut (British Columbia) Bottom longline British Columbia Longline Nova Scotia and Newfoundland Gillnet including part of the Grand banks and Trawl Georges bank, NAFO areas 3NOPS, Atlantic Halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus Canada
    [Show full text]
  • Monda Y , March 22, 2021
    NATIONAL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOCIATION Program and Abstracts of the 113th Annual Meeting March 22 − 25, 2021 Global Edition @ http://shellfish21.com Follow on Social Media: #shellfish21 NSA 113th ANNUAL MEETING (virtual) National Shellfisheries Association March 22—March 25, 2021 MONDAY, MARCH 22, 2021 DAILY MEETING UPDATE (LIVE) 8:00 AM Gulf of Maine Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Puget Sound Chesapeake Bay Monterey Bay SHELLFISH ONE HEALTH: SHELLFISH AQUACULTURE EPIGENOMES & 8:30-10:30 AM CEPHALOPODS OYSTER I RESTORATION & BUSINESS & MICROBIOMES: FROM SOIL CONSERVATION ECONOMICS TO PEOPLE WORKSHOP 10:30-10:45 AM MORNING BREAK THE SEA GRANT SHELLFISH ONE HEALTH: EPIGENOMES COVID-19 RESPONSE GENERAL 10:45-1:00 PM OYSTER I RESTORATION & & MICROBIOMES: FROM SOIL TO THE NEEDS OF THE CONTRIBUTED I CONSERVATION TO PEOPLE WORKSHOP SHELLFISH INDUSTRY 1:00-1:30 PM LUNCH BREAK WITH SPONSOR & TRADESHOW PRESENTATIONS PLENARY LECTURE: Roger Mann (Virginia Institute of Marine Science, USA) (LIVE) 1:30-2:30 PM Chesapeake Bay EASTERN OYSTER SHELLFISH ONE HEALTH: EPIGENOMES 2:30-3:45 PM GENOME CONSORTIUM BLUE CRABS VIBRIO RESTORATION & & MICROBIOMES: FROM SOIL WORKSHOP CONSERVATION TO PEOPLE WORKSHOP BLUE CRAB GENOMICS EASTERN OYSTER & TRANSCRIPTOMICS: SHELLFISH ONE HEALTH: EPIGENOMES 3:45–5:45 PM GENOME CONSORTIUM THE PROGRAM OF THE VIBRIO RESTORATION & & MICROBIOMES: FROM SOIL WORKSHOP BLUE CRAB GENOME CONSERVATION TO PEOPLE WORKSHOP PROJECT TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2021 DAILY MEETING UPDATE (LIVE) 8:00 AM Gulf of Maine Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Puget Sound
    [Show full text]
  • Spisula Solidissima) Using a Spatially Northeastern Continental Shelf of the United States
    300 Abstract—The commercially valu- able Atlantic surfclam (Spisula so- Management strategy evaluation for the Atlantic lidissima) is harvested along the surfclam (Spisula solidissima) using a spatially northeastern continental shelf of the United States. Its range has con- explicit, vessel-based fisheries model tracted and shifted north, driven by warmer bottom water temperatures. 1 Declining landings per unit of effort Kelsey M. Kuykendall (contact author) (LPUE) in the Mid-Atlantic Bight Eric N. Powell1 (MAB) is one result. Declining stock John M. Klinck2 abundance and LPUE suggest that 1 overfishing may be occurring off Paula T. Moreno New Jersey. A management strategy Robert T. Leaf1 evaluation (MSE) for the Atlantic surfclam is implemented to evalu- Email address for contact author: [email protected] ate rotating closures to enhance At- lantic surfclam productivity and in- 1 Gulf Coast Research Laboratory crease fishery viability in the MAB. The University of Southern Mississippi Active agents of the MSE model 703 East Beach Drive are individual fishing vessels with Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564 performance and quota constraints 2 Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography influenced by captains’ behavior Department of Ocean, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences over a spatially varying population. 4111 Monarch Way, 3rd Floor Management alternatives include Old Dominion University 2 rules regarding closure locations Norfolk, Virginia 23529 and 3 rules regarding closure du- rations. Simulations showed that stock biomass increased, up to 17%, under most alternative strategies in relation to estimated stock biomass under present-day management, and The Atlantic surfclam (Spisula solid- ally not found where average bottom LPUE increased under most alterna- issima) is an economically valuable temperatures exceed 25°C (Cargnelli tive strategies, by up to 21%.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Handling and Storage
    Seafood Health Facts: Making Smart Choices Balancing the Benefits and Risks of Seafood Consumption Resources for Health Care Providers and Patients • seafoodhealthfacts.org Patients and Consumers Seafood Safety Seafood Handling and Storage This section provides practical advice for consumers to help them transport, store and prepare seafood products to ensure safety and maximize quality. Introduction There are a number of very good resources for consumers on the safe handling and storage of seafood. The links to the web sites where these resources can be found are provided at the end of this page. If you would like more in-depth information, please go directly to these sites. The following summary was adapted from “A Consumer Guide to Safe Seafood Handling” by Doris Hicks, University of Delaware and “Fresh and Frozen Seafood: Selecting and Serving Safely” from the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Overview Safe handling and storage of all food should follow the same basic guidelines that are listed below. However, seafood is more perishable then many food items, and the consumer must pay a little more attention to its careful handling. Whether a consumer buys seafood from a market or catches/harvests fish and shellfish on their own, proper handling, storage and preparation are necessary to maintain quality and ensure safety. Although there are many types of seafood available from commercial sources or from recreational fishing, all fish and shellfish are highly perishable, and the same basic storage and handling guidelines should be followed: Keep it cold, Keep it clean, Store it quickly, Prepare and cook it properly.
    [Show full text]
  • Scallop SAFE 2021
    C1 Scallop SAFE April 2021 STOCK ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE SCALLOP FISHERY OFF ALASKA April 2021 Prepared by the: Scallop Plan Team With contributions by: Tyler Jackson (ADF&G-Kodiak), Jim Armstrong (NPFMC), Ryan Burt (ADF&G-Kodiak), Mike Byerly (ADF&G Homer), Scott Miller (NMFS Juneau), Andrew Olson (ADF&G-Douglas), John Olson (NMFS Anchorage), Jie Zheng (ADF&G Juneau), Kendall Henry (ADF&G-Juneau), North Pacific Fishery Management Council 1007 W. 3rd Avenue, Suite 400 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 C1 Scallop SAFE April 2021 Executive Summary An annual Scallop Stock Assessment Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) report is required by the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council’s Fishery Management Plan for the Scallop Fishery off Alaska (FMP). Under the FMP, the report is prepared by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) with input from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the Council’s scallop plan team (SPT). The SAFE summarizes current biological and economic status of the fisheries, guideline harvest levels, and support for different management decisions or changes in harvest strategies. In the absence of annual estimates of stock size, optimum yield (OY) and maximum sustainable yield (MSY) remain at fixed values, as per the FMP. Following recommendations from the SSC, an expanded executive summary with updated information will be produced as the SAFE report every other year, beginning in 2021. The Scallop Plan Team met on February 17th, 2021 to update the scallop SAFE executive summary with recent fishery independent survey information and fishery performance data. The Plan Team review was based on presentations by staff from the ADF&G, Council, and NMFS and included opportunities for public comment and input.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Different Deployment Strategies for Bay Scallop Spawner Sanctuaries in New York
    COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DEPLOYMENT STRATEGIES FOR BAY SCALLOP SPAWNER SANCTUARIES IN NEW YORK Stephen T. Tettelbach, Dennis Bonal, Andrew Weinstock, C.W. Post Campus of Long Island University, Brookville, NY 11548 Debra Barnes, NY State Dept. of Environmental Conservation, East Setauket, NY 11733 Gregg Rivara, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County, Southold, NY 11901 Chelsea Fitzsimons-Diaz, Roger Williams University, Bristol, RI 02809 John Carroll, Stony Brook University, Southampton, NY 11968 Funded through the State Wildlife Grant Program - New York Collaborators: NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation: Debra Barnes, Josh Thiel, M. Chase Cammarota Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County: Gregg Rivara, R.Michael Patricio Town of East Hampton Shellfish Hatchery: John Aldred, Frank Quevedo, Jennifer Gaites, Barley Dunne The Nature Conservancy: Wayne Grothe, Adam Starke, Joe Zipparo Long Island University: authors, plus Richard Ames, Shalini Gopie, Alex Mattis, Lindsay Moore, Kate Newman, Jennifer Rice; Ashton Schardt, Ian Simmers New York Bay Scallop Landings - Commercial - 800 700 ) 600 500 400 300 # Pounds of Meats (1000's 200 100 0 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 New York Bay Scallop Planting Methods: Overwintering and/or for Spawner Sanctuaries Study Objectives: • Evaluate Use of Suspended ADPI Bags for Bay Scallop Spawner Sanctuaries • Compare ADPI Bag System to High Density Free-Plantings NWH = NW Harbor Free-Planted Sectors ADPI Arrays 36 Arrays (3 bags ea): SI or EH 25 m SI EH SI EH 15 mm mesh
    [Show full text]