Beginner's Glossary to Fund Finance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beginner's Glossary to Fund Finance Article Beginner’s Glossary to Fund Finance Kristin M. Rylko and Mark C. Dempsey1 The following glossary is intended to serve as relating to the borrower Fund’s investments a reference tool for those that are new to the themselves. private equity fund finance space by Bad Boy Carve-Out is an exception to the demystifying some of the more commonly non-recourse nature of a loan that provides utilized terms in the fund finance industry. for a loan party to have full or partial personal Please note that these recourse liability for the loan in the event definitions/explanations are accurate as of the certain events occur (e.g., filing a voluntary date of publication, but that these terms may bankruptcy action). In a traditional evolve as applicable law and market custom Subscription-backed Credit Facility, bad-boy change. carve-outs typically apply to the General Account Pledgor means a loan party that has Partner of the Fund borrowers/guarantors and the right to receive Capital Contributions from are limited to actual damages of the lender Investors and that pledges the deposit arising as a result of the fraud, willful account or securities account into which misrepresentation or willful misappropriation Investor Capital Contributions are to be of loan or Capital Contribution proceeds on funded to the lender. the part of such General Partner. Aftercare Facility means a credit line Blocker is an entity, often a C-corporation, advanced to a private equity Fund borrower through which Tax-Exempt Investors invest in whose Commitment Period has expired. Post- a private equity Fund so as to shield such Tax- Commitment Period expiration, Fund Exempt Investors from having to pay US borrowers typically have significantly reduced income tax and file a US federal tax return. borrowing availability under a traditional Borrowing Base is used in asset-based Subscription-backed Credit Facility borrowing lending facilities to calculate the borrowing base; as such, Aftercare Facilities often have value of a borrower’s assets. The Borrowing expanded borrowing base advance rates, Base determines the maximum borrowing limited or no Concentration Limits and/or rely availability under the line of credit. Typically, a on a net asset value covenant for additional Borrowing Base is calculated by applying a lender protection. Aftercare Facilities are discount factor to each asset class (often, sometimes unsecured, though more though not always, constituting the collateral) frequently they are secured by one or more of against which the lender will advance funds a combination of traditional Subscription- (e.g., uncalled Capital Contributions, accounts backed Credit Facility collateral, distribution receivable, inventory, loan assets, etc.). proceeds from the borrower Fund’s investments, equity interests in holding Capital Call means the legal right of a private companies through which the borrower Fund equity Fund (or its General Partner) to demand makes investments and the equity interests from its Investors that they fund a portion of the money the Investors agreed to commit to than the General Partner would be entitled to the Fund. receive had profits and losses been allocated on an aggregate basis at the time of Capital Call Notice is a notice issued by a dissolution of the Fund. With reference to a private equity Fund (or its General Partner) Limited Partner, the obligation of an Investor instructing its Investors to make a Capital to return previously received distributions to Contribution to the Fund to permit the Fund the Fund if the Fund requires such amounts to to make an investment or pay for Fund fulfill its indemnification obligations or satisfy Expenses or liabilities. Often referred to as a expenses or other liabilities. drawdown. Closed-End Fund means a collective Capital Commitment is the promise by an investment vehicle in which the total Investor in a private equity Fund to make committed capital and Investors are fixed at Capital Contributions to the Fund over a the end of a proscribed fundraising period, specified period of time. The Investor receives wherein the Investors each commit a specified an interest in the Fund at the time it makes amount of capital and have limited or no the Capital Commitment. rights to redeem their interest or withdraw Capital Contributions means the money or invested capital until the dissolution of the other assets transferred to a private equity Fund. Fund by an Investor with respect to the Collateral Account is a deposit or securities Investor’s Capital Commitment. account into which collateral (Capital Cascading Pledge is an alternative tiered- Contributions) is deposited and over which a collateral structure employed when tax, lender has a perfected security interest. regulatory or ERISA concerns prevent a Feeder Commitment Period is the time frame, Fund from guaranteeing and directly pledging typically a period of 3-5 years, during which a collateral to the lender to support a Fund private equity Fund is permitted to call capital borrower’s obligations under a Subscription- from Investors to make new investments or backed Credit Facility. In a Cascading Pledge, additional investments in portfolio companies. the Feeder Fund grants a security interest in its Capital Commitments and call rights to a Concentration Limit means, in an asset- Blocker entity; the Blocker entity in turn grants based lending facility, a specified percentage a security interest in its rights under the of the total eligible Borrowing Base over which security agreement from the Feeder Fund to no loan value is given with respect to a the Fund borrower; the Fund borrower in turn particular asset or type of collateral, thereby grants a security interest in its rights, including promoting diversification in the Borrowing those under the security agreement, from the Base. In a Subscription-backed Credit Facility, Blocker entity to the lender. a Concentration Limit may work to limit the aggregate unfunded Capital Commitments Clawback (either General Partner or that a single Investor or a class of Investors Limited Partner) means, with reference to a (e.g., High-Net-Worth Investors) can General Partner or manager, a mechanism contribute to the overall Borrowing Base. whereby a private equity manager is obligated to return a portion of its previously received Defaulting Investor is an Investor in a private Promote or performance fee payment if as a equity Fund that has breached the Fund’s result of timing and Fund performance, the constituent documents, namely by failing to General Partner receives more carry or make a Capital Contribution when required performance fee during the life of the Fund pursuant to a Capital Call Notice. Defaulting 2 Mayer Brown | Beginner’s Glossary to Fund Finance Investors are subject to various remedies company that is the subject of a Follow-On under a Fund’s partnership agreement, which Investment. may include a forced sale of the Defaulting Fund means a private collective investment Investor’s interest at a discount as well as loss vehicle formed to make equity and/or debt of certain rights, such as participating in future investments in accordance with the criteria investments and voting. and investment objectives set forth in the ERISA Fund means a private equity Fund that Fund’s constituent documents, including a consists of, or is deemed to hold, plan assets private equity Fund and a Hedge Fund, as the and operates as a plan asset vehicle that is context may require. subject to Title I of ERISA and/or Section 4975 Fund Expenses broadly refers to the liabilities of the Internal Revenue Code. In the context incurred in connection with (i) establishing a of a Subscription-backed Credit Facility, private equity Fund (frequently referred to as borrowers and lenders have concerns “organizational expenses”) and (ii) operating a regarding ERISA Funds and potential Fund (frequently referred to as “operating prohibited transactions with lenders which expenses”). Organizational expenses generally may subject the Fund and the lender to heavy include the out-of-pocket costs incurred by tax penalties. the sponsor in forming the Fund, such as ERISA Limited Partner is an Investor that is (i) legal, accounting, filing, travel and similar an “employee benefit plan” (as defined in expenses; organizational expenses are often ERISA) subject to Title I of ERISA; (ii) any “plan” capped at a specified amount. Operating defined in and subject to Section 4975 of the expenses generally include liabilities related to Internal Revenue Code; or (iii) any other entity acquiring, maintaining and disposing of whose assets include or are deemed to investments, Management Fees paid to the include the assets of one or more such sponsor, taxes, third-party service providers employee benefit plans in accordance with and borrowing costs, expenses and principal ERISA and related regulations. amounts. Both organizational expenses and operating expenses are paid by the Fund’s Feeder Fund is an upper-tier special-purpose Investors. entity formed by a private equity Fund to facilitate investment in the Fund by one or Fund of One means a private equity or hedge more Investors, usually to address a tax Fund that has a single dedicated Investor. The concern. As such, the Investors to a Feeder General Partner or manager controls the Fund invest in the Fund indirectly through the vehicle that holds the assets in a Fund of One Feeder Fund. and makes investment decisions on behalf of the vehicle. Some primary benefits of a Fund Follow-On Investments are investments in an of One over a comingled investment vehicle existing portfolio company of a private equity are that the investment mandate of the Fund Fund that are made to protect or enhance the can be customized for the Investor and the value of the Fund’s investment. Follow-On Investor is protected from co-Investor Investments are often permitted to be made (default) risk.
Recommended publications
  • More Than Just Looking for Profit
    Analysis ROUNDTABLE SPONSORS APAX PARTNERS • ARDIAN • DECHERT • EURAZEO More than just looking for profit Four insiders tell Carmela Mendoza how the private equity industry in France has shifted amid political and fiscal changes and why sustainability has become a much bigger play n 15 April, three days year, a 13 percent jump from the previous election of Macron as president in 2017 before Private Equity year’s €16.5 billion and the highest ever has totally changed the attitude of for- International gathered since industry association France Invest eign investors toward France – from the four French private began tracking data in 1996, according to measures to attract talent into technology equity veterans to- its Activity of French Private Equity in 2018 or venture companies, to the end of the gether in Paris for a report. wealth tax.” Odiscussion on the market, a massive blaze The industry is also delivering: French Many funds did not want to touch hit the 850-year-old Notre Dame Cathe- private equity has generated a net internal France from 2010 to 2016, he says, with dral, destroying its iconic spire and a large rate of return of 10 percent-plus over 10 most London-based pan-European funds part of the roof. Thousands of Parisians years, data from France Invest show. looking almost exclusively at northern Eu- watched in horror as flames engulfed the Eddie Misrahi, president and chief exec- rope. “Brexit first happened, then Macron gothic masterpiece. utive of mid-market firm Apax Partners, says was elected nine months later and sudden- When we met on a warm spring after- the upward trajectory of French private eq- ly everybody wanted to be in France.” noon a few days later, Notre Dame and its uity is the result of the natural evolution of François Jerphagnon, managing direc- imminent restoration was on everyone’s the industry, partly helped by Brexit, which tor and head of expansion at Ardian, adds: minds.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Building Long-term Wealth by Investing in Private Companies Annual Report and Accounts 12 Months to 31 January 2021 Our Purpose HarbourVest Global Private Equity (“HVPE” or the “Company”) exists to provide easy access to a diversified global portfolio of high-quality private companies by investing in HarbourVest-managed funds, through which we help support innovation and growth in a responsible manner, creating value for all our stakeholders. Investment Objective The Company’s investment objective is to generate superior shareholder returns through long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of private markets investments. Our Purpose in Detail Focus and Approach Investment Manager Investment into private companies requires Our Investment Manager, HarbourVest Partners,1 experience, skill, and expertise. Our focus is on is an experienced and trusted global private building a comprehensive global portfolio of the markets asset manager. HVPE, through its highest-quality investments, in a proactive yet investments in HarbourVest funds, helps to measured way, with the strength of our balance support innovation and growth in the global sheet underpinning everything we do. economy whilst seeking to promote improvement in environmental, social, Our multi-layered investment approach creates and governance (“ESG”) standards. diversification, helping to spread risk, and is fundamental to our aim of creating a portfolio that no individual investor can replicate. The Result Company Overview We connect the everyday investor with a broad HarbourVest Global Private Equity is a Guernsey base of private markets experts. The result is incorporated, London listed, FTSE 250 Investment a distinct single access point to HarbourVest Company with assets of $2.9 billion and a market Partners, and a prudently managed global private capitalisation of £1.5 billion as at 31 January 2021 companies portfolio designed to navigate (tickers: HVPE (£)/HVPD ($)).
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA  = Board Action Requested
    BOARD OF UNIVERSITY AND SCHOOL LANDS Pioneer Meeting Room State Capitol July 29, 2020 at 9:00 AM AGENDA = Board Action Requested 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes – Jodi Smith Consideration of Approval of Land Board Meeting Minutes by voice vote. A. June 25, 2020 – pg. 2 2. Reports – Jodi Smith A. June Shut-In Report – pg. 19 B. June Extension Report – pg. 25 C. June Report of Encumbrances -- pg. 26 D. June Unclaimed Property Report – pg. 31 E. April Financial Position – pg. 32 F. Investments Update – pg. 41 3. Energy Infrastructure and Impact Office – Jodi Smith A. Contingency Grant Round Recommendations – pg. 42 4. Investments – Michael Shackelford A. Opportunistic Investments – pg. 44 5. Operations – Jodi Smith A. Continuing Appropriation Authority Policy – Second Reading – pg. 100 B. Payment Criteria Policy – Repeal – pg. 103 C. Assigned Fund Balance – pg. 105 6. Litigation – Jodi Smith A. United States Department of Interior M – 37056 – pg. 109 B. Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation vs. United States of America, 1:20-cv-00859-MCW C. Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation vs. United States Department of Interior, et al., 1:20-cv-01918 Executive session under the authority of NDCC §§ 44-04-19.1 and 44-04-19.2 for attorney consultation with the Board’s attorneys to discuss: - Next Meeting Date – August 27, 2020 88 Minutes of the Meeting of the Board of University and School Lands June 26, 2020 The June 26, 2020 meeting of the Board of University and School Lands was called to order at 8:05 AM in the Coteau Meeting Room of the State Capitol by Chairman Doug Burgum.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity Fund Formation in 2012
    Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Private Equity Fund Formation in 2012 Navigating Capital Raising Under a New Regulatory Landscape: Dodd Frank, JOBS Act, the Volcker Rule, and ILPA Revised Principles WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific Today’s faculty features: Scott W. Naidech, Partner, Chadbourne & Parke, New York Adam D. Gale, Counsel, Chadbourne & Parke, New York L. Charles Bartz, Senior Advisor, Berchwood Partners, New York The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10. Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-888-450-9970 and enter your PIN -when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again. FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps: • In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your location • Click the SEND button beside the box If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: • Click on the + sign next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left- hand column on your screen.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet Our Speakers
    MEET OUR SPEAKERS DEBRA ABRAMOVITZ Morgan Stanley Debra Abramovitz is an Executive Director of Morgan Stanley and serves as Chief Operating Officer of Morgan Stanley Expansion Capital. Debra oversees all financial, administrative, investor relations and operational activities for Morgan Stanley Expansion Capital, and its predecessor Morgan Stanley Venture Partners funds. Debra also serves as COO of Morgan Stanley Credit Partners. Debra joined Morgan Stanley’s Finance Department in 1983 and joined Morgan Stanley Private Equity in 1988, with responsibility for monitoring portfolio companies. Previously, Debra was with Ernst & Young. Debra is a graduate of American University in Paris and the Columbia Business School. JOHN ALLAN-SMITH Barclays Americas John Allan-Smith leads the US Funds team for Corporate Banking at Barclays and is responsible for coordinating the delivery of products and services from our global businesses; ranging from debt, FX solutions, cash management and trade finance, to working capital lending and liquidity structures. John joined Barclays in 2014 and has 20 years of experience in the funds sector. Prior to joining Barclays, John worked at The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) in London, Stockholm and New York, spending 10 years in the RBS Leveraged Finance team. Subsequently, John had responsibility for the portfolios and banking sector of the Non-Core division of RBS in the Americas. John holds an ACA qualification from the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and is a qualified accountant. He also has a BSc (Hons) in Chemistry from The University of Nottingham. ROBERT ANDREWS Ashurst LLP Robert is a partner in the banking group at Ashurst and is one of the most experienced funds finance specialists in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Bain Capital Distressed and Special Situations 2019 (A), LP
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM Public Investment Memorandum Bain Capital Distressed and Special Situations 2019 (A), L.P. High Yield/Private Credit Commitment James F. Del Gaudio Senior Portfolio Manager April 22, 2019 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM Recommendation: PSERS Investment Professionals, together with Hamilton Lane Advisors, L.L.C. (“Hamilton Lane”), recommend the Board commit up to $200 million to Bain Capital Distressed and Special Situations 2019 (A), L.P. (the “Fund”, or “DSS 19”). Bain Capital Credit, LP (“Bain” or the “Firm”) is seeking to raise their third dedicated distressed and special situations fund, DSS 19, which will focus on global special situations opportunities and distressed securities, targeting $3 billion in commitments. Firm Overview: Bain Capital Credit, LP, an affiliate of Bain Capital, LP, is a leading global credit specialist. The Firm was formed as Sankaty Advisors in 1998 by Jonathan Lavine, Managing Partner and CIO, based on the idea that one could successfully apply the same level of rigorous analysis developed in Bain Capital’s Private Equity business to credit investing. With approximately $39 billion in assets under management as of January 1, 2019, Bain Capital Credit invests across the full spectrum of credit strategies, including leveraged loans, high-yield bonds, distressed debt, direct lending, structured products, non-performing loans (“NPLs”), and equities. Bain Capital Credit currently has 297 employees in
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for a Public-Private Partnership to Increase The
    A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future Enhancing Commercial Technical Report NREL/TP-110-40463 Outcomes from R&D May 2007 A Framework for a Public–Private Partnership to Increase the Yield of Federally Funded R&D Investments and Promote Economic Development L.M. Murphy Manager, Enterprise Development Programs National Renewable Energy Laboratory P. Jerde Executive Director Robert H. and Beverly A. Deming Center for Entrepreneurship, Leeds School of Business University of Colorado, Boulder L. Rutherford Venture Partner Vista Ventures R. Barone 2008 MS/MBA Candidate Department of Environmental Studies and Leeds School of Business University of Colorado, Boulder NREL is operated by Midwest Research Institute ● Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 Enhancing Commercial Technical Report NREL/TP-110-40463 Outcomes from R&D May 2007 A Framework for a Public–Private Partnership to Increase the Yield of Federally Funded R&D Investments and Promote Economic Development L.M. Murphy Manager, Enterprise Development Programs National Renewable Energy Laboratory P. Jerde Executive Director Robert H. and Beverly A. Deming Center for Entrepreneurship, Leeds School of Business University of Colorado, Boulder L. Rutherford Venture Partner Vista Ventures R. Barone 2008 MS/MBA Candidate Department of Environmental Studies and Leeds School of Business University of Colorado, Boulder Prepared under Task No. 1100.1000 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Management Handbook for Grant Implementers
    The Global Fund Financial Management Handbook for Grant Implementers December 2017 Geneva, Switzerland This page has been intentionally left blank Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................ 4 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Purpose and Scope ..................................................................................................... 5 1.3 The Global Fund Funding Model ............................................................................... 6 1.4 The Global Fund’s Financial Management Principles ............................................... 6 1.5 Financial Management System .................................................................................. 7 2 The Global Fund Funding Cycle .............................................................. 9 2.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Financial Management in the Funding Cycle ............................................................ 9 2.2.1 Stage 1: Country Dialogue.................................................................................................. 9 2.2.2 Stage 2: Funding Request ................................................................................................ 10 2.2.3 Stage 3: Grant Making ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SDCERS' Investment Committee
    SDCERS’ INVESTMENT COMMITTEE Meeting of April 17, 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF STAFF REPORTS Investment Division Staffing • Christina Tamayo has filled the Investment Analyst position and staffing for the division is complete. Status Reports • $12.85 million was wired out from State Street for February’s monthly benefit payments and operating expenses. • Net invested assets as reported by the custodial bank totaled $4.828 billion (unaudited) as of April 4th. Asset Allocation • There have been no rebalancing activities since January’s market driven rebalancing. Managers Watch List • One equity portfolio was added to the watch list under the category of significant organizational changes related to the pending departure of key personnel. Three firms were subject to on-site visitations by staff to review operations as a result of being place on the Watch List. Real Estate Activity • The annual review of the SDCERS’ separate properties was held with the two core managers and the real estate consultant. • A $2.8 million in capital was called by four of our real estate managers. • A $15 million capital call from INVESCO for purchase of a Buena Park, CA, industrial property is expected to occur in late April. Private Equity Program Design and Implementation • Staff continues to work with Callan in refining the RFP to search for a fiduciary oversight manager to direct the placement of capital in the private equity asset class. Staff has been in contact with over 30 firms and pension funds to review firms’ capabilities and obtain a fuller understanding of the range of services and investment approaches available in the private markets arena.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Rationality of the Capital Market: Capitalistic System Vs. Islamic
    Rationality of the Capital Market: Capitalistic System vs. Islamic System Md. Mahmudul Alam* School of Economics, Finance & Banking (SEFB) College of Business (COB) Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +601-82467050 Chowdhury Shahed Akbar Southeast Bank Limited Eunoos Trade Center 51-52 Dilkusha C/A, Dhaka, Bangla-desh Email: [email protected] * Corresponding Author Citation Reference: Alam, M.M., Akbar, C.S. 2015. Rationality of the Capital Market: Capitalistic System vs. Islamic System, International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance. Vol. 5(3-4), pp. 279-297. [Online Link] This is a pre-publication copy. The published article is copyrighted by the publisher of the journal. 1 Rationality of the Capital Market: Capitalistic System vs. Islamic System Abstract Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) is founded on the theory of expected rationality but the theory of behavioural finance concludes that stock market investors are quasi-rational. Therefore, under the capitalistic system, the efficient markets have already failed to protect the rights of investors that have led to chronic capital market crashes and failure to achieve efficiency, justice, fairness, accountability, fair distribution of benefits, and a rational behaviour among investors. However, recently, Islamic financial institutions and markets have been emerging, which stand on the Shariah provision – the guided way to behave rationally or guided rationality. Based on the empirical experiences and evidences of both market systems, this paper discusses and compares the performances of the markets under the theoretical arguments of “rationality”, “quasi-rationality”, and “guided rationality”. This paper suggests that capital market based on guided rationality under the Islamic System can be a better alternative over the conventional market system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Funding Channels for Microfinance Performance
    University of Washington Tacoma UW Tacoma Digital Commons Global Honors Theses Global Honors Program Spring 6-10-2016 The mpI ortance of Funding Channels for Microfinance Performance Roman Fedorak University of Washington Tacoma, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/gh_theses Part of the Behavioral Economics Commons, Economic Theory Commons, Growth and Development Commons, and the International Economics Commons Recommended Citation Fedorak, Roman, "The mporI tance of Funding Channels for Microfinance Performance" (2016). Global Honors Theses. 34. https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/gh_theses/34 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Global Honors Program at UW Tacoma Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Global Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UW Tacoma Digital Commons. THE IMPORTANCE OF FUNDING CHANNELS FOR MICROFINANCE PERFORMANCE Roman Fedorak Politics, Philosophy and Economics May, 2016 Ph.D. Cynthia Howson Essay completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Global Honors, University of Washington, Tacoma Abstract This paper studies the importance of microfinance funding channels by analyzing how for-profit and non-profit microfinance institutions’ performances differ in practice. Generally all MFIs seek financial sustainability in order to avoid reliance on external funding and increase efficiency. However, for-profit MFIs tend to rely more heavily on standard economic assumptions established by the neoclassical economics model, shifting the priority away from the social and economic development process among poor communities to the final product of loan repayment enjoyed by such institutions. By contrast, non-profit MFIs attracting donors contributions tend to focus more closely on shifts in social dynamics within communities they sponsor leading to higher development enjoyed by such communities in the long run.
    [Show full text]
  • FT PARTNERS RESEARCH 2 Fintech Meets Alternative Investments
    FT PARTNERS FINTECH INDUSTRY RESEARCH Alternative Investments FinTech Meets Alternative Investments Innovation in a Burgeoning Asset Class March 2020 DRAFT ©2020 FinTech Meets Alternative Investments Alternative Investments FT Partners | Focused Exclusively on FinTech FT Partners’ Advisory Capabilities FT Partners’ FinTech Industry Research Private Capital Debt & Raising Equity Sell-Side / In-Depth Industry Capital Buy-Side Markets M&A Research Reports Advisory Capital Strategic Structuring / Consortium Efficiency Proprietary FinTech Building Advisory FT Services FINTECH Infographics Partners RESEARCH & Board of INSIGHTS Anti-Raid Advisory Directors / Advisory / Monthly FinTech Special Shareholder Committee Rights Plans Market Analysis Advisory Sell-Side Valuations / LBO Fairness FinTech M&A / Financing Advisory Opinion for M&A Restructuring Transaction Profiles and Divestitures Named Silicon Valley’s #1 FinTech Banker Ranked #1 Most Influential Person in all of Numerous Awards for Transaction (2016) and ranked #2 Overall by The FinTech in Institutional Investors “FinTech Excellence including Information Finance 40” “Deal of the Decade” • Financial Technology Partners ("FT Partners") was founded in 2001 and is the only investment banking firm focused exclusively on FinTech • FT Partners regularly publishes research highlighting the most important transactions, trends and insights impacting the global Financial Technology landscape. Our unique insight into FinTech is a direct result of executing hundreds of transactions in the sector combined with over 18 years of exclusive focus on Financial Technology FT PARTNERS RESEARCH 2 FinTech Meets Alternative Investments I. Executive Summary 5 II. Industry Overview and The Rise of Alternative Investments 8 i. An Introduction to Alternative Investments 9 ii. Trends Within the Alternative Investment Industry 23 III. Executive Interviews 53 IV.
    [Show full text]