Separate Accounts Vs. Commingled Funds: Similarities and Differences in the Context of Credit Facilities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Separate Accounts Vs. Commingled Funds: Similarities and Differences in the Context of Credit Facilities Article Separate Accounts vs. Commingled Funds: Similarities and Differences in the Context of Credit Facilities By Todd N. Bundrant and Wendy Dodson Gallegos1 The use of managed accounts as an investment efficiency associated with consolidating the vehicle has been widely publicized of late with number of capital calls made upon limited institutional investors such as the California State partners. These benefits would equally apply to Teachers’ Retirement System and the New York institutional investors establishing separate State Common Retirement Fund (referring to accounts with private equity firms and, despite such vehicles as “separate accounts”), and the fundamental differences between separate Teacher Retirement System of Texas and the New accounts and Funds, a separate account may be Jersey Division of Investment (referring to such structured to take advantage of the flexibility vehicles as “strategic partnerships”) making afforded by a similar credit facility. sizeable investments with high-profile private equity firms such as Apollo Global Management, Definition of “Separate Account” LLC, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. and the The term “separate account” has been used 2 Blackstone Group. generically to describe an arrangement whereby a Regardless of name, these tailored investment single investor provides virtually all of the vehicles represent a significant trend, with 32% of necessary equity capital for accomplishing a surveyed fund managers indicating they were specified investment objective. It is important, intending to invest more from separate accounts however, to distinguish a “separate account” from during 2013.3 And although structurally divergent a joint venture or partnership in which there is an from commingled real estate or private equity additional party (frequently the investment funds (“Funds”), these separate accounts share a manager) with an equity interest in the owner of common objective with Funds: to produce strong the investment. The equity provided (or earned) returns with respect to invested capital in the by the investment manager may be slight in most efficient manner possible. comparison to the equity capital provided by the institutional investor. However, despite the In many situations, accessing a credit facility can imbalance of economic interests, these joint facilitate achieving investment objectives. This is ventures and partnerships involve two or more quite clear in the context of Funds establishing equity stakeholders and generally require careful subscription credit facilities, also frequently consideration with respect to many of the same referred to as a capital call facility (a “Facility”). issues which arise in the context of Funds These Facilities are popular for Funds because of (whether such Fund includes just a few, or a few the flexibility they provide to the general partner hundred, investors). And confusion arises when of the Fund in terms of liquidity and the these joint ventures and partnerships are termination), while termination of a Fund incorrectly referred to as a “separate account.” Manager ordinarily requires the consent of a majority or supermajority of the other limited In fact, a separate account (“Separate Account”) partners, and oftentimes must be supported by is an investment vehicle with only one (1) “cause” attributable to the action (or inaction) of commonly institutional investor (“Investor”) the Manager. However, there are also significant willing to commit significant capital to a manager costs and trade-offs associated with this (which may also simultaneously manage a Fund flexibility, including that the Investor must or Funds (“Manager”)) subject to the terms set identify and agree upon terms with a suitable forth in a two (2) party agreement (commonly Manager, and the time commitment and referred to as an Investment Management expertise required by the Investor to be actively Agreement or the “IMA”). The IMA is structured involved in analyzing and approving investment to meet specific goals of the Investor, which may recommendations made by the Manager. be strategic, tax-driven or relate to specific needs Likewise, the Manager will require a sizeable (such as excluding investments in a particular commitment to the Separate Account to type of asset or market). As a result, it is not overcome the inefficiency of a Separate Account atypical for a Separate Account to be non- as compared to operating a Fund with a larger discretionary in terms of investment decisions pool of committed capital, more beneficial fee made by the Manager (with Investor approval structures, and discretion over investment being required on a deal-by-deal basis). Separate decisions. Accounts can also be tailored to match the specific investment policies and reporting Benefits of Credit Facilities for Separate requirements of the Investor. Accounts Separate Accounts vs. Commingled Funds Notwithstanding the differences between Aside from fundamental differences such as the Separate Accounts and Funds, Investors and Managers alike would benefit from access to a number of investors and the potential lack of credit facility in connection with a Separate Manager discretion in making investment decisions (described above), several key Account. To begin with, credit facilities provide a ready source of capital so that investment distinctions exist between Separate Accounts and opportunities (once approved) can be quickly Funds. Notably, fees paid to the Manager under Separate Account arrangements are typically closed. Timing considerations are critical in a competitive environment for quality investments, lower than those paid to a Manager operating a particularly if internal Investor approvals are Fund (in part because of the leverage maintained by an Investor willing to commit significant difficult to obtain quickly. The liquidity offered by a credit facility can decrease Investor burden and capital to a Separate Account), and any shorten the overall investment process by performance fees must be carefully structured to ensure they do not violate applicable law relating eliminating the need for simultaneous arrangement of funding by the Investor. The to conflicts of interest. closing of an investment through a credit facility The popularity of Separate Accounts may be minimizes administration by both the Investor attributable to the greater flexibility they provide and Manager, as funding of the obligations to the to the Investor. In addition to Investor input Separate Account can be consolidated into a related to investment decisions, IMAs are routine call for capital (instead of multiple draws sometimes structured to be terminable at will taxing the human capital of both the Manager upon advance notice to the Manager (although and Investor executing the objectives of the IMA). there may be penalties associated with early 2 Mayer Brown | Structuring a Subscription Credit Facility for Open-End Funds And, perhaps most importantly from the to request and receive the related Account Investor’s perspective, a credit facility may Contribution when called by the Manager (a eliminate the need to continually maintain “Capital Call”), to the Creditor. If so, the Investor liquidity for the capital required to fund retains discretion with respect to both investment investments contemplated by the Separate selection and Facility utilization and, when drawn Account. upon the Facility, would be supported by a pledge of: (a) the Required Commitment; (b) the right of Although alternatives exist (including asset-level the Manager to make a Capital Call upon the financing arrangements), many Funds have Required Commitment after an event of default established Facilities for purposes of obtaining under the Facility (and the right of the Creditor to liquidity, flexibility and efficiency in connection enforce payment thereof); and (c) the account with portfolio management. The most common into which the Investor is required to fund form of Facility is a loan by a bank or other credit Account Contributions in response to a Capital institution (the “Creditor”) to a Fund, with the Call. Creditors may also require investor letters loan obligations being secured by the unfunded from the Investor acknowledging the rights and capital commitments (the “Unfunded obligations associated with this structure from Commitments”) of the limited partners of the time to time. As mentioned above, most Investors Fund. Under a Facility, the Creditor’s primary and Managers are familiar with these terms and and intended source of repayment is the funding recognize the benefits afforded by establishing a of capital contributions by such limited partners, Facility for purposes of flexibility, efficient instead of collateral support being derived from execution, and administration of private equity the actual investments made by the Fund. The investments. proven track record of Unfunded Commitments as collateral has generally enabled Creditors to Conclusion provide favorable Facility pricing as compared to asset-level financing, although many Funds The number of Funds seeking a Facility is steadily utilize both forms of credit in order to increase increasing due to the benefits these loans provide overall leverage of the investment portfolio. to Investors and Managers in terms of liquidity and facilitating investment execution, while Assuming the Investor is a creditworthy simultaneously decreasing the administrative institution, the IMA can be drafted to take burden associated with numerous and/or advantage of the
Recommended publications
  • More Than Just Looking for Profit
    Analysis ROUNDTABLE SPONSORS APAX PARTNERS • ARDIAN • DECHERT • EURAZEO More than just looking for profit Four insiders tell Carmela Mendoza how the private equity industry in France has shifted amid political and fiscal changes and why sustainability has become a much bigger play n 15 April, three days year, a 13 percent jump from the previous election of Macron as president in 2017 before Private Equity year’s €16.5 billion and the highest ever has totally changed the attitude of for- International gathered since industry association France Invest eign investors toward France – from the four French private began tracking data in 1996, according to measures to attract talent into technology equity veterans to- its Activity of French Private Equity in 2018 or venture companies, to the end of the gether in Paris for a report. wealth tax.” Odiscussion on the market, a massive blaze The industry is also delivering: French Many funds did not want to touch hit the 850-year-old Notre Dame Cathe- private equity has generated a net internal France from 2010 to 2016, he says, with dral, destroying its iconic spire and a large rate of return of 10 percent-plus over 10 most London-based pan-European funds part of the roof. Thousands of Parisians years, data from France Invest show. looking almost exclusively at northern Eu- watched in horror as flames engulfed the Eddie Misrahi, president and chief exec- rope. “Brexit first happened, then Macron gothic masterpiece. utive of mid-market firm Apax Partners, says was elected nine months later and sudden- When we met on a warm spring after- the upward trajectory of French private eq- ly everybody wanted to be in France.” noon a few days later, Notre Dame and its uity is the result of the natural evolution of François Jerphagnon, managing direc- imminent restoration was on everyone’s the industry, partly helped by Brexit, which tor and head of expansion at Ardian, adds: minds.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Building Long-term Wealth by Investing in Private Companies Annual Report and Accounts 12 Months to 31 January 2021 Our Purpose HarbourVest Global Private Equity (“HVPE” or the “Company”) exists to provide easy access to a diversified global portfolio of high-quality private companies by investing in HarbourVest-managed funds, through which we help support innovation and growth in a responsible manner, creating value for all our stakeholders. Investment Objective The Company’s investment objective is to generate superior shareholder returns through long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of private markets investments. Our Purpose in Detail Focus and Approach Investment Manager Investment into private companies requires Our Investment Manager, HarbourVest Partners,1 experience, skill, and expertise. Our focus is on is an experienced and trusted global private building a comprehensive global portfolio of the markets asset manager. HVPE, through its highest-quality investments, in a proactive yet investments in HarbourVest funds, helps to measured way, with the strength of our balance support innovation and growth in the global sheet underpinning everything we do. economy whilst seeking to promote improvement in environmental, social, Our multi-layered investment approach creates and governance (“ESG”) standards. diversification, helping to spread risk, and is fundamental to our aim of creating a portfolio that no individual investor can replicate. The Result Company Overview We connect the everyday investor with a broad HarbourVest Global Private Equity is a Guernsey base of private markets experts. The result is incorporated, London listed, FTSE 250 Investment a distinct single access point to HarbourVest Company with assets of $2.9 billion and a market Partners, and a prudently managed global private capitalisation of £1.5 billion as at 31 January 2021 companies portfolio designed to navigate (tickers: HVPE (£)/HVPD ($)).
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA  = Board Action Requested
    BOARD OF UNIVERSITY AND SCHOOL LANDS Pioneer Meeting Room State Capitol July 29, 2020 at 9:00 AM AGENDA = Board Action Requested 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes – Jodi Smith Consideration of Approval of Land Board Meeting Minutes by voice vote. A. June 25, 2020 – pg. 2 2. Reports – Jodi Smith A. June Shut-In Report – pg. 19 B. June Extension Report – pg. 25 C. June Report of Encumbrances -- pg. 26 D. June Unclaimed Property Report – pg. 31 E. April Financial Position – pg. 32 F. Investments Update – pg. 41 3. Energy Infrastructure and Impact Office – Jodi Smith A. Contingency Grant Round Recommendations – pg. 42 4. Investments – Michael Shackelford A. Opportunistic Investments – pg. 44 5. Operations – Jodi Smith A. Continuing Appropriation Authority Policy – Second Reading – pg. 100 B. Payment Criteria Policy – Repeal – pg. 103 C. Assigned Fund Balance – pg. 105 6. Litigation – Jodi Smith A. United States Department of Interior M – 37056 – pg. 109 B. Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation vs. United States of America, 1:20-cv-00859-MCW C. Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation vs. United States Department of Interior, et al., 1:20-cv-01918 Executive session under the authority of NDCC §§ 44-04-19.1 and 44-04-19.2 for attorney consultation with the Board’s attorneys to discuss: - Next Meeting Date – August 27, 2020 88 Minutes of the Meeting of the Board of University and School Lands June 26, 2020 The June 26, 2020 meeting of the Board of University and School Lands was called to order at 8:05 AM in the Coteau Meeting Room of the State Capitol by Chairman Doug Burgum.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity Fund Formation in 2012
    Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Private Equity Fund Formation in 2012 Navigating Capital Raising Under a New Regulatory Landscape: Dodd Frank, JOBS Act, the Volcker Rule, and ILPA Revised Principles WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific Today’s faculty features: Scott W. Naidech, Partner, Chadbourne & Parke, New York Adam D. Gale, Counsel, Chadbourne & Parke, New York L. Charles Bartz, Senior Advisor, Berchwood Partners, New York The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10. Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-888-450-9970 and enter your PIN -when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again. FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps: • In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your location • Click the SEND button beside the box If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: • Click on the + sign next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left- hand column on your screen.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet Our Speakers
    MEET OUR SPEAKERS DEBRA ABRAMOVITZ Morgan Stanley Debra Abramovitz is an Executive Director of Morgan Stanley and serves as Chief Operating Officer of Morgan Stanley Expansion Capital. Debra oversees all financial, administrative, investor relations and operational activities for Morgan Stanley Expansion Capital, and its predecessor Morgan Stanley Venture Partners funds. Debra also serves as COO of Morgan Stanley Credit Partners. Debra joined Morgan Stanley’s Finance Department in 1983 and joined Morgan Stanley Private Equity in 1988, with responsibility for monitoring portfolio companies. Previously, Debra was with Ernst & Young. Debra is a graduate of American University in Paris and the Columbia Business School. JOHN ALLAN-SMITH Barclays Americas John Allan-Smith leads the US Funds team for Corporate Banking at Barclays and is responsible for coordinating the delivery of products and services from our global businesses; ranging from debt, FX solutions, cash management and trade finance, to working capital lending and liquidity structures. John joined Barclays in 2014 and has 20 years of experience in the funds sector. Prior to joining Barclays, John worked at The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) in London, Stockholm and New York, spending 10 years in the RBS Leveraged Finance team. Subsequently, John had responsibility for the portfolios and banking sector of the Non-Core division of RBS in the Americas. John holds an ACA qualification from the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and is a qualified accountant. He also has a BSc (Hons) in Chemistry from The University of Nottingham. ROBERT ANDREWS Ashurst LLP Robert is a partner in the banking group at Ashurst and is one of the most experienced funds finance specialists in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Bain Capital Distressed and Special Situations 2019 (A), LP
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM Public Investment Memorandum Bain Capital Distressed and Special Situations 2019 (A), L.P. High Yield/Private Credit Commitment James F. Del Gaudio Senior Portfolio Manager April 22, 2019 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM Recommendation: PSERS Investment Professionals, together with Hamilton Lane Advisors, L.L.C. (“Hamilton Lane”), recommend the Board commit up to $200 million to Bain Capital Distressed and Special Situations 2019 (A), L.P. (the “Fund”, or “DSS 19”). Bain Capital Credit, LP (“Bain” or the “Firm”) is seeking to raise their third dedicated distressed and special situations fund, DSS 19, which will focus on global special situations opportunities and distressed securities, targeting $3 billion in commitments. Firm Overview: Bain Capital Credit, LP, an affiliate of Bain Capital, LP, is a leading global credit specialist. The Firm was formed as Sankaty Advisors in 1998 by Jonathan Lavine, Managing Partner and CIO, based on the idea that one could successfully apply the same level of rigorous analysis developed in Bain Capital’s Private Equity business to credit investing. With approximately $39 billion in assets under management as of January 1, 2019, Bain Capital Credit invests across the full spectrum of credit strategies, including leveraged loans, high-yield bonds, distressed debt, direct lending, structured products, non-performing loans (“NPLs”), and equities. Bain Capital Credit currently has 297 employees in
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for a Public-Private Partnership to Increase The
    A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future Enhancing Commercial Technical Report NREL/TP-110-40463 Outcomes from R&D May 2007 A Framework for a Public–Private Partnership to Increase the Yield of Federally Funded R&D Investments and Promote Economic Development L.M. Murphy Manager, Enterprise Development Programs National Renewable Energy Laboratory P. Jerde Executive Director Robert H. and Beverly A. Deming Center for Entrepreneurship, Leeds School of Business University of Colorado, Boulder L. Rutherford Venture Partner Vista Ventures R. Barone 2008 MS/MBA Candidate Department of Environmental Studies and Leeds School of Business University of Colorado, Boulder NREL is operated by Midwest Research Institute ● Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 Enhancing Commercial Technical Report NREL/TP-110-40463 Outcomes from R&D May 2007 A Framework for a Public–Private Partnership to Increase the Yield of Federally Funded R&D Investments and Promote Economic Development L.M. Murphy Manager, Enterprise Development Programs National Renewable Energy Laboratory P. Jerde Executive Director Robert H. and Beverly A. Deming Center for Entrepreneurship, Leeds School of Business University of Colorado, Boulder L. Rutherford Venture Partner Vista Ventures R. Barone 2008 MS/MBA Candidate Department of Environmental Studies and Leeds School of Business University of Colorado, Boulder Prepared under Task No. 1100.1000 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • SDCERS' Investment Committee
    SDCERS’ INVESTMENT COMMITTEE Meeting of April 17, 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF STAFF REPORTS Investment Division Staffing • Christina Tamayo has filled the Investment Analyst position and staffing for the division is complete. Status Reports • $12.85 million was wired out from State Street for February’s monthly benefit payments and operating expenses. • Net invested assets as reported by the custodial bank totaled $4.828 billion (unaudited) as of April 4th. Asset Allocation • There have been no rebalancing activities since January’s market driven rebalancing. Managers Watch List • One equity portfolio was added to the watch list under the category of significant organizational changes related to the pending departure of key personnel. Three firms were subject to on-site visitations by staff to review operations as a result of being place on the Watch List. Real Estate Activity • The annual review of the SDCERS’ separate properties was held with the two core managers and the real estate consultant. • A $2.8 million in capital was called by four of our real estate managers. • A $15 million capital call from INVESCO for purchase of a Buena Park, CA, industrial property is expected to occur in late April. Private Equity Program Design and Implementation • Staff continues to work with Callan in refining the RFP to search for a fiduciary oversight manager to direct the placement of capital in the private equity asset class. Staff has been in contact with over 30 firms and pension funds to review firms’ capabilities and obtain a fuller understanding of the range of services and investment approaches available in the private markets arena.
    [Show full text]
  • FT PARTNERS RESEARCH 2 Fintech Meets Alternative Investments
    FT PARTNERS FINTECH INDUSTRY RESEARCH Alternative Investments FinTech Meets Alternative Investments Innovation in a Burgeoning Asset Class March 2020 DRAFT ©2020 FinTech Meets Alternative Investments Alternative Investments FT Partners | Focused Exclusively on FinTech FT Partners’ Advisory Capabilities FT Partners’ FinTech Industry Research Private Capital Debt & Raising Equity Sell-Side / In-Depth Industry Capital Buy-Side Markets M&A Research Reports Advisory Capital Strategic Structuring / Consortium Efficiency Proprietary FinTech Building Advisory FT Services FINTECH Infographics Partners RESEARCH & Board of INSIGHTS Anti-Raid Advisory Directors / Advisory / Monthly FinTech Special Shareholder Committee Rights Plans Market Analysis Advisory Sell-Side Valuations / LBO Fairness FinTech M&A / Financing Advisory Opinion for M&A Restructuring Transaction Profiles and Divestitures Named Silicon Valley’s #1 FinTech Banker Ranked #1 Most Influential Person in all of Numerous Awards for Transaction (2016) and ranked #2 Overall by The FinTech in Institutional Investors “FinTech Excellence including Information Finance 40” “Deal of the Decade” • Financial Technology Partners ("FT Partners") was founded in 2001 and is the only investment banking firm focused exclusively on FinTech • FT Partners regularly publishes research highlighting the most important transactions, trends and insights impacting the global Financial Technology landscape. Our unique insight into FinTech is a direct result of executing hundreds of transactions in the sector combined with over 18 years of exclusive focus on Financial Technology FT PARTNERS RESEARCH 2 FinTech Meets Alternative Investments I. Executive Summary 5 II. Industry Overview and The Rise of Alternative Investments 8 i. An Introduction to Alternative Investments 9 ii. Trends Within the Alternative Investment Industry 23 III. Executive Interviews 53 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation, Second Edition
    This page intentionally left blank VENTURE CAPITAL & THE FINANCE OF INNOVATION This page intentionally left blank VENTURE CAPITAL & THE FINANCE OF INNOVATION SECOND EDITION ANDREW METRICK Yale School of Management AYAKO YASUDA Graduate School of Management, UC Davis John Wiley & Sons, Inc. EDITOR Lacey Vitetta PROJECT EDITOR Jennifer Manias SENIOR EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Emily McGee MARKETING MANAGER Diane Mars DESIGNER RDC Publishing Group Sdn Bhd PRODUCTION MANAGER Janis Soo SENIOR PRODUCTION EDITOR Joyce Poh This book was set in Times Roman by MPS Limited and printed and bound by Courier Westford. The cover was printed by Courier Westford. This book is printed on acid free paper. Copyright 2011, 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, website www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774, (201)748-6011, fax (201)748-6008, website http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Evaluation copies are provided to qualified academics and professionals for review purposes only, for use in their courses during the next academic year. These copies are licensed and may not be sold or transferred to a third party.
    [Show full text]
  • NVCA 2021 YEARBOOK Data Provided by Dear Readers
    YEARBOOK Data provided by Credits & Contact National Venture Capital Association NVCA Board of Directors 2020-2021 (NVCA) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Washington, DC | San Francisco, CA nvca.org | [email protected] | 202-864-5920 BARRY EGGERS Lightspeed Venture Partners, Venture Forward Chair Washington, DC | San Francisco, CA MICHAEL BROWN Battery Ventures, Chair-Elect ventureforward.org | [email protected] JILL JARRETT Benchmark, Treasurer ANDY SCHWAB 5AM Ventures, Secretary BOBBY FRANKLIN President and CEO PATRICIA NAKACHE Trinity Ventures, At-Large JEFF FARRAH General Counsel EMILY MELTON Threshold Ventures, At-Large JUSTIN FIELD Senior Vice President of Government MOHAMAD MAKHZOUMI NEA, At-Large Affairs MARYAM HAQUE Executive Director, Venture AT-LARGE Forward MICHAEL CHOW Research Director, NVCA and PETER CHUNG Summit Partner Venture Forward DIANE DAYCH Granite Growth Health Partners STEPHANIE VOLK Vice President of Development BYRON DEETER Bessemer Venture Partners RHIANON ANDERSON Programs Director, Venture SCOTT DORSEY High Alpha Forward RYAN DRANT Questa Capital CHARLOTTE SAVERCOOL Senior Director of PATRICK ENRIGHT Longitude Capital Government Affairs STEVE FREDRICK Grotech Ventures MICHELE SOLOMON Director of Administration CHRIS GIRGENTI Pritzker Group Venture Capital DEVIN MILLER Manager of Communications and JOE HOROWITZ Icon Ventures Digital Strategy GEORGE HOYEM In-Q-Tel JASON VITA, Director of Programming and CHARLES HUDSON Precursor Ventures Industry Relations JILL JARRETT Benchmark JONAS MURPHY Manager of Government Affairs
    [Show full text]
  • Final Rule: Exemptions for Advisers to Venture Capital Funds, Private
    39646 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Rules and Regulations SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 6. No Redemption Rights The primary purpose of Congress in COMMISSION 7. Represents Itself as Pursuing a Venture repealing section 203(b)(3) was to Capital Strategy require advisers to ‘‘private funds’’ to 17 CFR Part 275 8. Is a Private Fund register under the Advisers Act.6 Private 9. Application to Non-U.S. Advisers [Release No. IA–3222; File No. S7–37–10] 10. Grandfathering Provision funds include hedge funds, private B. Exemption for Investment Advisers equity funds and other types of pooled RIN 3235–AK81 Solely to Private Funds With Less Than investment vehicles that are excluded $150 Million in Assets Under from the definition of ‘‘investment Exemptions for Advisers to Venture Management company’’ under the Investment Capital Funds, Private Fund Advisers 1. Advises Solely Private Funds Company Act of 1940 7 (‘‘Investment With Less Than $150 Million in Assets 2. Private Fund Assets Company Act’’) by reason of section Under Management, and Foreign 3. Assets Managed in the United States 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of such Act.8 Section Private Advisers 4. United States Person 3(c)(1) is available to a fund that does C. Foreign Private Advisers AGENCY: Securities and Exchange 1. Clients not publicly offer the securities it 9 Commission. 2. Private Fund Investor issues and has 100 or fewer beneficial 10 ACTION: Final rule. 3. In the United States owners of its outstanding securities. A 4. Place of Business fund relying on section 3(c)(7) cannot SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange 5.
    [Show full text]