Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Monday Volume 492 18 May 2009 No. 78 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 18 May 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; Tel: 0044 (0) 208876344; e-mail: licensing@opsi.gov.uk 1187 18 MAY 2009 1188 Mr. Prentice: The police have been severely criticised House of Commons for their kettling technique, which they used in the G20 demonstrations a few weeks ago. Will my friend assure Monday 18 May 2009 me that there is no question whatever of the police using Tasers for crowd control? The House met at half-past Two o’clock Mr. Coaker: To reassure my hon. Friend, I have said to the Joint Committee on Human Rights that Tasers PRAYERS should not be used in public order control situations, and Tasers were not used during the G20 demonstrations. Officers equipped with Tasers raided a residence in an [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] operation to arrest individuals suspected of criminal damage at the G20 protest. My hon. Friend makes an important point, however: there is a right to protest in this country, and Tasers are not appropriate for use in Oral Answers to Questions controlling such demonstrations. Chris Huhne (Eastleigh) (LD): Three weeks ago, four HOME DEPARTMENT environmental protesters dressed as suffragettes superglued themselves to a statue of Viscount Falkland in Parliament. They were arrested for demonstrating unlawfully, held The Secretary of State was asked— in detention for a total of 18 hours and given hugely restrictive police bail conditions, such as not being Sexual Assault Referral Centres allowed even any contact with each other, although they were friends. Does the Minister accept that there is 1. Lynda Waltho (Stourbridge) (Lab): What funding widespread controversy about the way in which lawful her Department has allocated to sexual assault referral and peaceful protests are policed—as evidenced by the centres for 2009-10. [275709] solicitors of the climate camp protestors today echoing our call for a full judicial inquiry? Does he agree that an The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the inquiry would provide useful public guidance to the Home Department (Mr. Alan Campbell): In 2009-10, police on policing lawful and peaceful protest? £1.6 million has been allocated for sexual assault referral centres—SARCs. As part of the 2008 funding round, Mr. Coaker: The hon. Gentleman will know that £659,000 was allocated, and a further £941,000 was there is always a balance to be struck between protest announced on 15 April this year. and the rights of law-abiding citizens to go about their business and the protection of property. That balance is Lynda Waltho: I welcome that fantastic news about difficult for the police sometimes to maintain, but funding, but when I met women from Women’s Aid a notwithstanding the case to which the hon. Gentleman few weeks ago they were concerned that funding, although has referred, we have an excellent example outside welcome, may be diverted from rape crisis centres and Parliament currently of the police dealing with quite a that they will continually have to reapply for funding difficult situation—controlling the Tamil demonstration from different pots of money. Will my hon. Friend but at the same time trying as far as they can to allow reassure me that that will not happen? After all, rape access to Parliament. The hon. Gentleman makes an crisis centres were set up for women, by women, for a important point, however, and he will know that Denis specific function that is slightly different from that of O’Connor, the chief of Her Majesty’s inspectorate of sexual assault referral centres. constabulary, having been asked by the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, will consider the whole issue of Mr. Campbell: I am happy to give my hon. Friend public order and tactics. We await that review with that reassurance. We value the work of rape crisis interest. centres and SARCs, and that is why we continue to invest in both of them. However, it is right that we look John Bercow (Buckingham) (Con): The Minister of at co-ordinating provision where possible to ensure that State’s reply to the hon. Member for Eastleigh (Chris we make the best use of funding. Huhne) is both measured and reassuring. Can I invite the Minister of State to confer with his right hon. and Water Cannon hon. Friends in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in order that those Ministers can explain once and for 3. Mr. Gordon Prentice (Pendle) (Lab): What all to the Government of Sri Lanka, a country that I discussions she has had with police forces on the use of recently visited, that the British police are not in the water cannon by police forces in policing business of seeking to restrain or disperse protestors by demonstrations. [275712] the use of water cannon simply because they are holding placards or waving banners of which that Government The Minister for Security, Counter-Terrorism, Crime happen to disapprove? It is not the British way. and Policing (Mr. Vernon Coaker): The Home Office, working with the police, keeps all less lethal technologies, Mr. Coaker: The hon. Gentleman makes an important including water cannon, under constant review. There point. The Foreign Office and Foreign Office Ministers are no plans to introduce water cannon at the present are engaged in discussions with the demonstrators outside time. Parliament and, indeed, with the Sri Lankan Government 1189 Oral Answers18 MAY 2009 Oral Answers 1190 about the whole issue of protest. In this country, people point that I was making was that the police are doing a have a right to protest. That is what is going on outside, very good job with what is happening in Parliament and in my view and that of many people, the policing of square at present. To go back to the original question that demonstration, by facilitating protest but as far as about the use of water cannon and other such equipment, possible allowing the public and Parliament to go about it is encouraging to see our police policing such a their business, is a testament to the police. It is sometimes demonstration in normal uniform, by and large. difficult for the police, because people may say that something ought to be done about Tamils who are Michael Savage sitting in the road, for example, but the only way to move them, if they will not move, is by force. The way in which the police have tried to persuade people to conform 4. Michael Fabricant (Lichfield) (Con): For what is the right way forward. reasons she decided to prevent Michael Savage from entering the UK; and if she will make a statement. Mr. Gerald Howarth (Aldershot) (Con): Does the [275713] Minister not accept that what is going on in Parliament square is an absolute disgrace? It is an abuse of the right The Secretary of State for the Home Department to protest. For seven weeks, the square has effectively (Jacqui Smith): Michael Savage was excluded for engaging been under semi-permanent occupation by the Tamils, in unacceptable behaviour by seeking to provoke others and people going about their business in London have to serious criminal acts and by fostering hatred that been disrupted. Why will the Minister not answer me might lead to inter-community violence. The exclusion when I ask how many police days have been devoted to is in line with the strengthened policy on exclusions that the demonstration and how much it has cost? The I announced to the House on 28 October last year. In Minister has told me that the Home Office does not his radio broadcasts, Mr. Savage has spoken about keep those figures and that they are a matter for the killing 100 million Muslims, and he has spoken in Metropolitan Police Commissioner. Who is in charge of violent terms about homosexuals. Coming to the UK is the Metropolitan Police Commissioner? The people of a privilege. I refuse to extend that privilege to individuals London should be told how much the demonstration is who abuse our standards and values to undermine our costing. way of life. Mr. Coaker: The fact is that the number of officers Michael Fabricant: Notwithstanding the Home and the amount of resources deployed are an operational Secretary’s answer, she will be aware that the things of matter for the Metropolitan Police Commissioner. The which she accuses Mike Savage are also illegal in the only point that I make to the hon. Gentleman is that, United States of America, and he has not faced prosecution far from being an affront to democracy, what is going there. Does she realise how ludicrous her ban is and the on out there is a victory for democracy. disrepute into which she has put this country in the eyes of many right-seeing—and, indeed, left-seeing—people Having said that, I should also say that of course in the United States? Does she also plan to ban Howard there are issues about how any demonstration is policed. Stern, Rush Limbaugh and other middle-aged, white, However, I pose this question to the hon. Gentleman: ordinary, American radio presenters? what would be the effect were the police to conduct a clearance operation, bring the tents down and forcibly Jacqui Smith: I subscribe to the view, as expressed by remove people, including women and children? Then we another Member of this House, that would see a protest from the other side of the argument.
Recommended publications
  • King's College Hospital Board of Directors
    King’s College Hospital Board of Directors PUBLIC AGENDA Time of meeting 14:00 Date of meeting Tuesday, 16 December 2014 Venue Dulwich Room, Hambledon Wing, Denmark Hill Members: Prof. Sir George Alberti (GA) Trust Chair Graham Meek (GM) Non-Executive Director, Vice Chair Marc Meryon (MM1) Non-Executive Director Christopher Stooke (CS) Non-Executive Director Sue Slipman (SS) Non-Executive Director Tim Smart (TS) Chief Executive Angela Huxham (AH) Director of Workforce Development Trudi Kemp (TD) - Non-voting Director Director of Strategy Dr. Michael Marrinan (MM) Medical Director Roland Sinker (RS) Chief Operating Officer Simon Taylor (ST) Chief Financial Officer Dr. Geraldine Walters (GW) Director of Nursing & Midwifery Jane Walters (JW) - Non-voting Director Director of Corporate Affairs In attendance: Tamara Cowan (TC) Board Secretary (Minutes) Prof. Sir Robert Lechler (RL) Executive Director, KHP Sally Lingard (SL) Associate Director of Communications Linda Smith KCH Charity Representative Apologies: Prof. Ghulam Mufti (GM1) Non-Executive Director Faith Boardman (FB) Non-Executive Director Circulation to: Board of Directors Circulation List Enclosure Lead Time 1. STANDING ITEMS G Alberti 14:00 1.1. Apologies 1.2. Declarations of Interest 1.3. Chair’s Action 1.4. Minutes of Previous Meeting – 25/11/2014 Enc 1.4 1.5. Matters Arising/Action Tracking Enc 1.5 2. FOR REPORT/DISCUSSION 2.1. Update from Board Committee Chairs 14:05 2.1.1. Audit Committee Verbal C Stooke 2.1.2. Board Integration Committee Verbal C Stooke 2.1.3. Finance & Performance Committee Verbal G Meek 2.1.4. Quality & Governance Committee Verbal G Alberti 2.1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Views About the Adequacy of the Stipend to Attract Church of This House of Commons and Often Conducts Priests, Especially in Rural Parishes
    Thursday Volume 497 15 October 2009 No. 124 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 15 October 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: licensing@opsi.gov.uk 419 15 OCTOBER 2009 420 open for such use as Parliament required. In the usual House of Commons fashion, however, it did not allow for funding from Parliament. We hope that Members will contribute Thursday 15 October 2009 generously to the appeal, and I repeat that they should visit the church as often as they can. I will certainly refer the hon. Gentleman’s question to The House met at half-past Ten o’clock the Church Commissioners. PRAYERS David Taylor (North-West Leicestershire) (Lab/Co-op): One of the most heavily used paved areas in this crowded and busy city must be the footpath between St. Margaret’s [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] and the abbey, and the slabbed area in front of the church. Is it right that the church is having to fund the BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS restoration of those cracked and uneven areas? Should that not be either for Westminster city council or for the CANTERBURY CITY COUNCIL BILL (BY ORDER) national taxpayer? If that is part of the scheme, it is unfair. Motion made, That the Bill be now considered.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2014
    European Parliament Elections 2014 Updated 12 March 2014 Overview of Candidates in the United Kingdom Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 CANDIDATE SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................................................. 2 3.0 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS: VOTING METHOD IN THE UK ................................................................ 3 4.0 PRELIMINARY OVERVIEW OF CANDIDATES BY UK CONSTITUENCY ............................................ 3 5.0 ANNEX: LIST OF SITTING UK MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ................................ 16 6.0 ABOUT US ............................................................................................................................. 17 All images used in this briefing are © Barryob / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-3.0 / GFDL © DeHavilland EU Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. 1 | 18 European Parliament Elections 2014 1.0 Introduction This briefing is part of DeHavilland EU’s Foresight Report series on the 2014 European elections and provides a preliminary overview of the candidates standing in the UK for election to the European Parliament in 2014. In the United Kingdom, the election for the country’s 73 Members of the European Parliament will be held on Thursday 22 May 2014. The elections come at a crucial junction for UK-EU relations, and are likely to have far-reaching consequences for the UK’s relationship with the rest of Europe: a surge in support for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) could lead to a Britain that is increasingly dis-engaged from the EU policy-making process. In parallel, the current UK Government is also conducting a review of the EU’s powers and Prime Minister David Cameron has repeatedly pushed for a ‘repatriation’ of powers from the European to the national level. These long-term political developments aside, the elections will also have more direct and tangible consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party
    Royaume-Uni 73 élus Parti pour Démocrates libéraux Une indépendance de Parti conservateur ECR Parti travailliste PSE l’indépendance du Les Verts PVE ALDE l'Europe NI Royaume-Uni MELD 1. Vicky Ford MEP 1. Richard Howitt MEP 1. Andrew Duff MEP 1. Patrick O’Flynn 1. Paul Wiffen 1. Rupert Read 2. Geoffrey Van Orden 2. Alex Mayer 2. Josephine Hayes 2. Stuart Agnew MEP 2. Karl Davies 2. Mark Ereira-Guyer MEP 3. Sandy Martin 3. Belinda Brooks-Gordon 3. Tim Aker 3. Raymond Spalding 3. Jill Mills 3. David Campbell 4. Bhavna Joshi 4. Stephen Robinson 4. Michael Heaver 4. Edmond Rosenthal 4. Ash Haynes East of England Bannerman MEP 5. Paul Bishop 5. Michael Green 5. Andrew Smith 5. Rupert Smith 5. Marc Scheimann 4. John Flack 6. Naseem Ayub 6. Linda Jack 6. Mick McGough 6. Dennis Wiffen 6. Robert Lindsay 5. Tom Hunt 7. Chris Ostrowski 7. Hugh Annand 7. Andy Monk 7. Betty Wiffen 7. Fiona Radic 6. Margaret Simons 7. Jonathan Collett 1. Ashley Fox MEP 1. Clare Moody 1. Sir Graham Watson 1. William Dartmouth 1. David Smith 1. Molly Scott Cato 2. Julie Girling MEP 2. Glyn Ford MEP MEP 2. Helen Webster 2. Emily McIvor 3. James Cracknell 3. Ann Reeder 2. Kay Barnard 2. Julia Reid 3. Mike Camp 3. Ricky Knight 4. Georgina Butler 4. Hadleigh Roberts 3. Brian Mathew 3. Gawain Towler 4. Andrew Edwards 4. Audaye Elesady South West 5. Sophia Swire 5. Jude Robinson 4. Andrew Wigley 4. Tony McIntyre 5. Phil Dunn 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Med V10 N1.Qxd 16/02/2011 16:10 Page 3
    Acute Medicine V10 N1_Acute Med V10 N1.qxd 16/02/2011 16:10 Page 3 Acute Medicine 2011; 10(1): 3-4 3 Guest Editorial The Rebirth of General, ‘Acute’ Medicine: will the baby survive? Professor Sir George Alberti uring the 1980s and 1990s general medicine specialty. Unfortunately this was not the conclusion was progressively displaced by medical of the first working party! However, a subsequent D specialties as the major focus of a consultant group did indeed agree that the development of physician’s career. Fewer and fewer people were acute medicine was important, leading to the appointed as ‘general physicians with a specialist creation of Acute Medicine as a subspeciality of interest’, which had been the norm prior to this. GIM. Concerns were expressed that consultants Specialists whose main focus was their ‘ology’ were appointed to such posts would suffer burn-out; continuing to be expected to take their share of acute inevitably those appointed in the first waves were medical “takes”. Training for most medical also accredited in another speciality. A 4 year training specialties still encompassed training in General programme, which provided accreditation in GIM Internal Medicine (GIM). However, this often was with recognition of the subspeciality training in truncated in favour of the main specialty and was Acute Medicine was developed. Later, the even resented, by some, as interfering with their recognition of Acute Internal Medicine (AIM) as a “proper” training. None of this was surprising: speciality in its own right ensured the development medical specialties were becoming more complex & of a specific AIM curriculum with its own set of many more treatments, interventions and diagnostic competencies allowing dual accreditation with GIM.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Digital Campaign
    BEHIND THE DIGITAL CAMPAIGN An exploration of the use, impact and regulation of digital campaigning Andy Williamson, Laura Miller & Freddy Fallon Acknowledgements Authors: Dr Andy Williamson, Dr Laura Miller & Freddy Fallon The Hansard Society would like to thank all the interviewees for their contribution and their time. Thanks also go to Beccy Allen, Karishma Desai, Jonathan Goodstone, Tuga Alaskary, Daniel Baldwin, Nicholas Phillips and Virginia Gibbons for their assistance and support. Hansard Society, 40-43 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1JA Tel: 020 7438 1222. Fax: 020 7438 1229. Email: edemocracy@hansard.lse.ac.uk Copyright © 2010 Hansard Society. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, without the prior permission of the Hansard Society. For more information about other Hansard Society publications visit our website at www.hansardsociety.org.uk Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................iii Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 1 Methods and Approaches...................................................................................................... 2 The Mediation of Political Life...................................................................................................... 4 A General History of Internet Campaigning .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Equality Bill 7 MAY 2009 Bill 85 of 2008-09
    RESEARCH PAPER 09/42 Equality Bill 7 MAY 2009 Bill 85 of 2008-09 Legislation to outlaw discrimination has existed for over 40 years. Typically, new Acts have had as their focus one area of policy, for example, pay, equal treatment of women, race discrimination etc. Almost inevitably, the body of current law, introduced piece meal over such a long period, has developed inconsistencies of both content and approach. As well as introducing new requirements one of the main aims of this Bill is to harmonise existing law into a more coherent whole. Vincent Keter BUSINESS & TRANSPORT SECTION WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM, LOUISE BUTCHER, RICHARD CRACKNELL, TIMOTHY EDMONDS, OONAGH GAY, CHRISTINE GILLIE, HELEN HOLDEN, ALEX HORNE, SUE HUBBLE, RICHARD KELLY, STEVEN KENNEDY, ADAM MELLOWS- FACER, VAUGHNE MILLAR, BRYN MORGAN, JO ROLL, LOUISE SMITH, DJUNA THURLEY AND WENDY WILSON HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: List of 15 most recent RPs 09/27 Coroners and Justice Bill: Committee Stage Report 19.03.09 09/28 Geneva Conventions and United Nations Personnel 20.03.09 (Protocols) Bill [HL] [Bill 69 of 2008-09] 09/29 Members’ pay and the independent review process 31.03.09 09/30 Economic Indicators, April 2009 08.04.09 09/31 Members since 1979 20.04.09 09/32 Unemployment by Constituency, March 2009 22.04.09 09/33 Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill: Committee 23.04.09 Stage Report 09/34 The financial crisis in the US: key events, causes and responses 23.04.09 09/35 Russia’s Military Posture 24.04.09 09/36 Russia and
    [Show full text]
  • Revolving Doors Special by Richard Brooks and Solomon Hughes
    REVOLVING00 DOORS SPECIAL REPORT 1 PUBLIC SERVANTS, PRIVATE PAYDAYS How ministers and mandarins make life after government pay – a Revolving Doors Special by Richard Brooks and Solomon Hughes Post-Brexit, it’s all change at the top. A bunch of ministers are out of a job and advisers and top officials might find it’s time to move on, too. But fret not. A well-trodden path from the public to private sector ensures ministers and mandarins looking to profit from their time in government are all but guaranteed a job in business, usually in an area over which they have exerted great influence. Today’s public servants have joined an undeclared public-private partnership with their future employers if, that is, they serve their future paymasters well. This is the story of Britain’s well-oiled Revolving Door, and the price we all pay for it… ETIREMENT jobs for those at the top of Rpublic life aren’t all new. Whitehall’s Sir Humphreys have long walked into Great British boardrooms soon after picking up their retirement carriage clocks. The corporate heavyweights had to be kept plugged into the establishment, after all. But for the politicians who, constitutionally at least, made the decisions affecting public life, taking the business shilling after a life in office was seen as below the salt. A life in government meant a This trend became a central feature in the that he was “a pretty straight kinda guy”. life in public service, and it wasn’t to be sullied atmosphere of sleaze surrounding the It was a while before serious political sleaze by cashing in at the end of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolic Syndrome
    The IDF consensus worldwide de nition of the METABOLIC SYNDROME No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF). Requests to reproduce or translate IDF publications should be addressed to: IDF Communications Avenue Emile De Mot 19, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium by fax at +32-2-5385114 or by e-mail at communications@idf.org © International Diabetes Federation, 2006 2 The IDF worldwide defi nition of the metabolic syndrome was developed during a unique consensus workshop on the initiative of Professors Sir George Alberti and Paul Zimmet. The workshop was held on behalf of the IDF Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention. After the meeting, a writing group was convened including: Sir George Alberti, London, UK Paul Zimmet, Melbourne, Australia Jonathan Shaw, Melbourne, Australia Scott M. Grundy, Dallas, USA, Consultant to Writing Group The IDF metabolic syndrome consensus defi nition process (workshop) was supported by an educational grant from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals. AstraZeneca had no role in the development of the consensus defi nition, or in the review or approval of the manuscript. This publication has been funded by IDF. The IDF also gratefully acknowledges the contribution of: Pablo Aschner - Bogotá, Columbia Beverley Balkau - France Philip Barter - Sydney, Australia Peter Bennett - Phoenix, USA Edward Boyko - Seattle, USA John Brunzell - Seattle, USA Juliana Chan - Hong Kong, SAR China Ralph DeFronzo - San Antonio,
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    20 May 2009 TOM WATSON MP Associated Newspapers Limited, the publisher of the Mail on Sunday and the Daily Mail, apologised today to Tom Watson MP in a Statement in Open Court Solicitors read before Mr Justice Eady. International Press Centre 76 Shoe Lane London EC4A 3JB Mr Watson complained of an article by Iain Dale, headed “Smears, glowering Tel 020 7353 5005 henchmen-like the Nixon White House” published in the Mail on Sunday on 12 Fax 020 7353 5553 April 2009 in which it was stated not only that Mr Watson was copied into emails DX 333 Chancery Lane sent by Downing Street press adviser Damian McBride to Derek Draper, but that Email lawyers@carter-ruck.com he “encouraged” them. The emails were reported to have made serious and Web site www.carter-ruck.com false allegations about the private lives of a number of Conservative Party MPs in the course of discussing proposals for a new website to be known as “Red Rag”. As the Court heard today, Associated Newspapers Limited now accepts that these allegations are entirely untrue. In fact, Mr Watson was not copied into any of the emails exchanged between Mr McBride and Mr Draper. As Mr Watson has already publicly made clear, he had no involvement in or knowledge of the “Red PRESS RELEASE Rag” website and he did not condone the content of the emails and, indeed, regarded them as completely inappropriate. Associated Newspapers Limited has unreservedly withdrawn the allegations, apologised to Mr Watson for the distress the article caused him and his family and has joined in the reading of the Statement in Open Court today.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Editorial: Les Chiens Aboient, La Caravane Passé Proverb: 1
    IAPB Africa Newsletter Volume 5, No 2, Q 2, 2016 CONTENTS 1. Editorial: Les Chiens Aboient, La Caravane Passé Proverb: 1. Editorial Life goes on, even if some will try to stop or talk against progress. 2. IAPB News Over the last 50 years, how we think about and how we approach the provision of 3. Technology eye care services in Africa has undergone several major paradigm shifts, from the 4. Disability initial prioritisation of restoration of sight, through the prevention of blindness era 5. Resources to the current paradigm of comprehensive eye health and universal coverage. 6. Knowledge Of course, everyone grows tired of hearing about „paradigm shifts‟ which nowadays 7. IAPB 10GA seem to be applied to the most mundane of changes. A paradigm shift, as identified 8. Snippets by American physicist Thomas Kuhn, is a fundamental change in the basic concepts and practices of a scientific discipline, leading to a scientific revolution when scientists encounter anomalies that cannot be explained by the current paradigm. In social sciences a paradigm shift replaces the former way of thinking or organizing with a radically different way of thinking or organizing. When enough significant anomalies have accrued against a current paradigm, the scientific discipline is thrown into a state of crisis. During this crisis, new ideas are tried. Eventually a new paradigm is formed, which gains its own new followers, and an intellectual "battle" takes place between the followers of the new paradigm and the hold-outs of the old paradigm. Africa has significantly
    [Show full text]