Received DOCKET FILE Copy Oricinal FEB 2·1197

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Received DOCKET FILE Copy Oricinal FEB 2·1197 REceiVED DOCKET FILE COpy ORiCINAL FEB 2·1197. Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Closed Captioning and Video ) Description of Programming ) MM Docket No. 95-176 ) Implementation of Section 305 of the ) Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) Video Programming Accessibility ) COMMENTS OF THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA IN THE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING The Alliance for Community Media (the "Alliance") respectfully submits the following comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the above-captioned proceeding, released January 17, 1997 ("Notice"). The Commission seeks comments on its proposed closed-captioning requirements, including alternative proposals that will fulfill the congressional mandate to ensure video accessibility to individuals with hearing disabilities. I. INTRODUCTION The Alliance for Community Media (" Alliance") is a national membership organization dedicated to ensuring everyone's access to electronic media, including cable television. The Alliance represents the interests of an estimated 1.5 million individuals involved with community, religious and charitable groups who use public, educational and governmental ("PEG") access channels on cable television systems and other telecommunications networks and facilities to speak to their communities. Members include access producers, access center managers and staff members, local cable advisory board members, city cable officials, cable company staff working in community 1 No. of Copiea recld~~ ListABCOE programming, and others involved in or supportive of PEG access programming around the country. The Alliance provides technical assistance to its members, represents its members' interests by advancing a positive legislative and regulatory environment, and supports local organizing. PEG access centers facilitate, produce and transmit local non-commercial, non-profit educational and public affairs television programming on local cable systems, pursuant to local franchise agreements authorized by Section 611 of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, Pub.L. No. 98-549,98 Stat. 2779 (hereinafter, "1984 Cable Act"). As such, the Alliance represents the interests of local religious, community, educational, charitable, and other non- commercial, non-profit institutions who use PEG access centers and facilities to speak to their communities and participate in an ever-growing "electronic town hall." Finally, the Alliance represents the concerns of all persons who believe that the abundant resources of the Information Age should be made available to organizations and individuals that otherwise would have insufficient means to use such resources. The Alliance is dedicated to protecting, defending and expanding the goals of the First Amendment as expressed by the Supreme Court in Red Lion Broadcasting: "[I]t is the purpose of the First Amendment to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which truth will ultimately prevail, rather than to countenance monopolization of that market... [I]t is the right of the viewers and listeners, not the right of the broadcasters, which is paramount... It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, esthetic, moral and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here."l 1 Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367, 390 (1969); see also Time Warner Entertainment Co.! L.P. v FCC, 93 F.3d 957, 973 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (citing Red Lion and Columbia Broadcasting Sys.! Inc. v. Democratic National Committee, 412 U.S. 94, 102( 1973). 2 I!tel In many smaller and rural towns and villages, PEG access is the only means by which residents receive truly local programming. In suburban jurisdictions which may be served by one or more broadcast stations, PEG access programming allows cable subscribers to participate in events and activities of importance to the suburban community, from local school board meetings and town council elections to televised plays and concerts. PEG access also provides a forum for local religious education programming, community college courses, and high school football games. In large urban areas, PEG access provides a variety and diversity of communication which is unavailable on commercial local stations. PEG access is provided on cable systems pursuant to a franchise agreement between a cable operator and a franchising authority (typically, a municipal government).2 Cable operators may also be required to provide services, facilities and equipment to make such access possible.3 Franchise authorities, which are entitled to collect franchise fees of up to five percent of gross revenue from cable operators,4 will often provide a portion of these fees for PEG access. PEG centers throughout the nation produce more than 20,000 hours of original programming per week; this is more than CBS, NBC, ABC, and PBS combined.5 2Id. 3Id. 41984 Cable Act, Sec. 622 (47 U.S.c. Sec. 542) 5S.Rep. 103-367 (accompanying S. 1822), 103rd Cong., 2d. Sess. (1994) at15. 3 II. CLOSED-CAPTIONING ON PEG CHANNELS WOULD PROVIDE ACCESS TO liTHE ELECTRONIC TOWN HALLU TO THOSE PREVIOUSLY EXCLUDED. The Alliance is dedicated to providing meaningful access to telecommunications services to all individuals, regardless of disability, race, religion, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, immigration status, etc. We enthusiastically support the policies behind closed­ captioning, which would allow significantly underserved populations to share in those parts of a national and international dialogue that take place via video programming services. The Alliance's interest in closed-captioning is twofold. First, the Alliance1s organizational members can and have presented programming produced by organizations serving the deaf and blind. For example, the Boston Community Network has shown programming for the deaf via television-TTY simulcast. By transmitting captioning, TTY and description through the PEG channel's vertical blanking interval and Second Audio Program, PEG access centers are technically capable of presenting captioned or described programming to all of their blind and deaf PEG access viewers. This captioning and description will allow members of blind and deaf organizations to present local programming to members of their particular community. Moreover, by providing access to deaf and blind cable subscribers, PEG access will allow for a richer dialogue among community residents. III. MANDATING CLOSED-CAPTIONING WITHOUT PROVIDING FUNDING PRESENTS SEVER ECONOMIC BURDENS FOR PEG CENTERS AND PRODUCERS. While the Alliance supports the concept of providing closed captioning for PEG access viewers, both cost and the unique nature of public access programming prevent PEG access centers from regularly providing closed captioning services. Most PEG presentations are 4 presented in unscripted interview, discussion, magazine, live or lecture formats. Consequently, the majority of PEG access programming would require a significant volume of captioning. The Notice states that costs for closed-captioning in most situations relevant to PEG access producers range from $120-$1,200 per hour for live programming, and $800-$2,500 for pre-recorded programming.6 The Alliance cross-references and asks the Commission to take notice of filings submitted by its members which detail each filer's annual total operating budget. Based on information available to the Alliance, the average yearly budget for a full-service PEG access center is $227,147 per year.7 The largest such center, in the Borough of Manhattan in New York, has a yearly budget of approximately $5,561,000 per year.s However, many PEG access centers have budgets of less than $50,000 per year; some have budgets as small as $2,000-3,000 per year.9 For instance, the PEG access center for the city of Riverside, California, with a resident population of more than 350,000, operates on a budget of $50,000 per year.l° The municipal access channel for Lansing, Michigan, operates on a yearly budget of $49,000.11 Blacksburg, Virginia's PEG access center operates on a budget of $47,000 per year.12 The PEG access center 6 Notice at ~~ 18-20. 7See Alliance for Community Media, 1994 Community Media Resource Directory, Appendix A. SId. at 186. 9llt, passim. lOId. at 30. l1Id. at 141. l2Id. at 220. 5 for Moorhead, Minnesota operates on a yearly budget of $38,000,l3 Appendix A (attached) is a list of yearly PEG access center budgets for which the Alliance has information. If closed-captioning were required of all PEG access programming, the Riverside center, for example, could show only 20 hours of programming per year, with no resources left over for salaries, equipment, and expenses. The Manhattan center could present six hours of closed-captioned programming a day (2,190 hours), but would only have $86,000 left over to pay rent, its 16 full-time and five part-time staff, its utility bills, and other associated expenses. Even without factoring in the costs of purchasing the equipment necessary to make closed­ captioning possible, a mandatory closed-caption requirement would put insuperable burdens on PEG access centers. Needless to say, PEG access centers associated with the Alliance would welcome the opportunity to show closed-captioned programming. The Alliance hopes that cable operators, local franchise authorities, and school boards will provide resources and equipment for closed­ captioning. We hope that cable operators will provide services, facilities and equipment to PEG access centers pursuant to their
Recommended publications
  • November 2020
    November 2020 Voluntary All-Digital Sponsorship ID AM Authorized Requirements Proposed The FCC has amended its rules to permit AM radio for Foreign Government stations to operate in an all-digital mode using the HD Radio technology licensed by Xperi Corporation. The details Programming of this action are explained in a Report and Order (FCC 20- 154) in Docket 19-311. After extensive testing conducted by In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 20-146) in NAB Labs and experimental operation of all-digital AM Docket 20-299, the FCC has proposed new requirements for station WWFD, Frederick, Maryland, the Commission has identifying the sponsors of broadcast radio and television concluded that all-digital transmission results in a clearer, programming provided directly or indirectly by a foreign more robust signal, with greater daytime coverage than a government. The current sponsorship identification rule, hybrid or analog AM signal. Section 73.1212 of the FCC’s Rules, requires disclosure of the An issue of concern in this proceeding has been the sponsor’s name. It does not, however, require a station to relative lack of digital receivers in use by consumers, determine whether the ultimate source of the programming is although there continues to be a rapid rise in the marketplace a foreign government nor does it mandate that the connection penetration of digital receivers, especially in automobiles. If to a foreign government be disclosed to the public at the time an AM station adopts the all-digital mode of operating, it will of broadcast. It may not be obvious in some cases that the no longer transmit an analog signal and will no longer be immediate source of programming, even though identified, heard with a traditional analog receiver.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-06-11A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-11 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition ) MB Docket No. 05-255 in the Market for the Delivery of Video ) Programming ) TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted: February 10, 2006 Released: March 3, 2006 Comment Date: April 3, 2006 Reply Comment Date: April 18, 2006 By the Commission: Chairman Martin, Commissioners Copps, Adelstein, and Tate issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of this Report......................................................................................................................... 2 B. Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. The Current State of Competition: 2005 ................................................................................... 4 2. General Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Specific Findings....................................................................................................................... 8 II. COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET FOR THE DELIVERY OF VIDEO PROGRAMMING ......... 27 A. Cable Television Service ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Media Entity Fox News Channel Oct
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-11 Programming Service Launch Ownership by Date "Other" Media Entity Fox News Channel Oct. 96 NewsCoqJ. Fox Reality May 05 News Corp. Fox Sports Net Nov. 97 News Corp. Fox Soccer Channel (fonnerly Fox Sports World) Nov. 97 News Corp. FX Jun. 94 News Corp. Fuel .luI. 03 News Corp. Frec Speech TV (FSTV) Jun. 95 Game Show Network (GSN) Dec. 94 Liberty Media Golden Eagle Broadcasting Nov. 98 preat American Country Dec. 95 EW Scripps Good Samaritan Network 2000 Guardian Television Network 1976 Hallmark Channel Sep.98 Liberty Media Hallmark Movie Channel Jan. 04 HDNET Sep.OI HDNET Movies Jan. 03 Healthy Living Channel Jan. 04 Here! TV Oct. 04 History Channel Jan. 95 Disney, NBC-Universal, Hearst History International Nov. 98 Disney, NBC-Universal, Hearst (also called History Channel International) Home & Garden Television (HGTV) Dec. 94 EW Scripps Home Shopping Network (HSN) Jul. 85 Home Preview Channel Horse Racing TV Dec. 02 !Hot Net (also called The Hot Network) Mar. 99 Hot Net Plus 2001 Hot Zone Mar. 99 Hustler TV Apr. 04 i-Independent Television (fonnerly PaxTV) Aug. 98 NBC-Universal, Paxson ImaginAsian TV Aug. 04 Inspirational Life Television (I-LIFETV) Jun. 98 Inspirational Network (INSP) Apr. 90 i Shop TV Feb. 01 JCTV Nov. 02 Trinity Broadcasting Network 126 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-11 Programming Service Launch Ownership by Date "Other" Media EntIty ~ewelry Television Oct. 93 KTV ~ Kids and Teens Television Dominion Video Satellite Liberty Channel Sep. 01 Lifetime Movie Network .luI. 98 Disney, Hearst Lifetime Real Women Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Geneva, Illinois
    The City of Geneva, Illinois Broadband Network Initiative United Telesystems, Inc. 1 Greatcoat Lane Savannah, Georgia 31411 912 598-7223 September 20, 2002 RESTRICTIONS ON DISCLOSURE OF DATA The data furnished in this document shall not be disclosed outside the organization or government to which it is submitted and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part, for any purpose other than to evaluate the document and to implement the plan that it sets forth. This restriction does not limit any right to use information contained in this document if it is obtained from another source. United Telesystems, Inc. THE CITY OF GENEVA, ILLINOIS BROADBAND NETWORK INTITIATIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS SEPTEMBER 20, 2002 1 TAB - Executive Summary of Business Plan 2 TAB - Broadband Services Industry Overview 3 TAB - Partnering Opportunity 4 TAB - Qualifying Statements and Plan of Financing 5 TAB - Municipal Administrative and Utility Applications 6 TAB - Broadband System Development & Marketing Plan 7 TAB - Proposed Video, Data and Telephone Services 8 TAB - Geneva Only Financial Projections Years 1 - 10 9 TAB - Geneva Only Financial Projections Months 1 - 12 10 TAB - Geneva Only Financial Projections Months 13 - 24 11 TAB - Tri-Cities Combined Financial Projections Years 1 - 10 12 TAB - Tri-Cities Combined Financial Projections Months 1 - 12 13 TAB - Tri-Cities Combined Financial Projections Months 13 - 24 14 TAB - Broadband Network Equipment Costs Detail 15 TAB - Video Service Provider Overview 16 TAB - Incumbent Telecommunications Provider Overview 17 TAB - Illinois Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Overview Confidential Page 1. 9/20/02 United Telesystems, Inc. THE CITY OF GENEVA, ILLINOIS BROADBAND NETWORK INTITIATIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS SEPTEMBER 20, 2002 (Continued) 18 TAB - Service Area Franchise Agreements 19 TAB - Federal and State Legal Review 20 TAB - Broadband Terms Glossary Confidential Page 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catalyst Capital Group Inc
    Court File No. CV-17-587463-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST B E T W E E N: THE CATALYST CAPITAL GROUP INC. and CALLIDUS CAPITAL CORPORATION Plaintiffs and WEST FACE CAPITAL INC., GREGORY BOLAND, M5V ADVISORS INC. C.O.B. ANSON GROUP CANADA, ADMIRALTY ADVISORS LLC, FRIGATE VENTURES LP, ANSON INVESTMENTS LP, ANSON CAPITAL LP, ANSON INVESTMENTS MASTER FUND LP, AIMF GP, ANSON CATALYST MASTER FUND LP, ACF GP, MOEZ KASSAM, ADAM SPEARS, SUNNY PURI, CLARITYSPRING INC., NATHAN ANDERSON, BRUCE LANGSTAFF, ROB COPELAND, KEVIN BAUMANN, JEFFREY MCFARLANE, DARRYL LEVITT, RICHARD MOLYNEUX, GERALD DUHAMEL, GEORGE WESLEY VOORHEIS, BRUCE LIVESEY and JOHN DOES #4-10 Defendants and CANACCORD GENUITY CORP. Third Party A N D B E T W E E N: WEST FACE CAPITAL INC. and GREGORY BOLAND Plaintiffs by Counterclaim and THE CATALYST CAPITAL GROUP INC., CALLIDUS CAPITAL CORPORATION, NEWTON GLASSMAN, GABRIEL DE ALBA, JAMES RILEY, VIRGINIA JAMIESON, EMMANUEL ROSEN, B.C. STRATEGY LTD. D/B/A BLACK CUBE, B.C. STRATEGY UK LTD. D/B/A BLACK CUBE and INVOP LTD. D/B/A PSY GROUP Defendants to the Counterclaim -2- A N D B E T W E E N: BRUCE LANGSTAFF Plaintiff by Counterclaim and THE CATALYST CAPITAL GROUP INC. and CALLIDUS CAPITAL CORPORATION Defendants to the Counterclaim MOTION RECORD OF THE DEFENDANTS, WEST FACE CAPITAL INC. AND GREGORY BOLAND (RE: CATALYST’S REFUSALS RETURNABLE DECEMBER 15, 2020) VOLUME 4 OF 4 November 17, 2020 DAVIES WARD PHILLIPS & VINEBERG LLP 155 Wellington Street West Toronto ON M5V 3J7 Kent E. Thomson (LSO# 24264J) 416.863.5566 [email protected] Matthew Milne-Smith (LSO# 44266P) 416.863.5595 [email protected] Andrew Carlson (LSO# 58850N) 416.367.7437 [email protected] Fax: 416.863.0871 Lawyers for the Defendants (Plaintiffs by Counterclaim), West Face Capital Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Oct 24, 2015 Tara Pages Edit Pages
    CURRICULUM VITAE CAROLYN F. A. DEAN M.D., N.D., C.N. Dr. Carolyn Dean is a Medical Doctor, Naturopathic Doctor, Herbalist, Acupuncturist, Nutritionist, Lecturer, Consultant, Researcher, and Author and Coauthor of over 33 health books and 108 Kindle books. WEBSITES Dr. Carolyn Dean Organized Wisdom Health Library RnA Drops, ReAline, ReNew, ReMag, ReMyte Website Live! with Dr. Carolyn Dean Radio Health Show Live! with Dr. Carolyn Dean Radio Health Show Archives SoundCloud: Audio Archives of Dr. Carolyn Dean EDUCATION 1973: B.Sc. (Biology), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS 1973-4: Pre-Med, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS 1974-7: Medical School, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS 1977-8: Fourth year Clerkship, McMaster University, Ontario 1978: M.D. Dalhousie University (top third of class) 1978-9 Internship, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario 1996: C.N. Certified Dietitian-Nutritionist 1997 N.D. Naturopathic Doctor, Ontario College of Naturopathic Medicine (Attained 1981, Conferred 1997) 1997: Medical Acupuncture, UCLA-Dr. Joseph Helms 1997-2000: Chinese Herbal Medicine-Intensive Study with Jeffrey Yuen plus Transcribing and Editing for Publication 1979-98: Annual seminars by Jeffery Bland Ph.D. on Nutrition. 1993: Apprenticeship with Dr. Walter Fischman in Chinese Herbal Medicine, Acupuncture, Homeopathy and Preparation of MIHR Formulas, 1990: Trained in the MIHR Technique (Magnetically Influenced Homeopathic Remedies) 1 ONGOING EDUCATION 2009-present: Doctor of the Future Publications. Creation of Completement Now! Two-Year Online Wellness Program. 2009-present: Ongoing Research RnA Drops, ReNew, ReAline, ReMag, ReMyte. 2009-present: Doctor of the Future Publications. Creation of Completement Now! Two-Year Online Wellness Program. 2007-present: Total Biology with Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of the Cord-Cutting Counterpublic
    Utrecht University The Effects of The Cord-Cutting Counterpublic How the Dynamics of Resistance and Resilience between the Cord-Cutters and the Television Distribution Industry Are Redefining Television Eleonora Maria Mazzoli Academic Year 2014-2015 Page intentionally left blank Utrecht University The Effects of the Cord-Cutting Counterpublic How the Dynamics of Resistance and Resilience between the Cord-Cutters and the Television Distribution Industry Are Redefining Television Master Thesis Eleonora Maria Mazzoli 4087186 RMA Media and Performance Studies Words: 37600 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. William Uricchio Second Reader: Prof. Dr. Eggo Müller Academic Year: 2014-2015 Cover picture by TechgenMag.com © 2015 by Eleonora Maria Mazzoli All rights reserved Page intentionally left blank To my parents, Donatella and Piergiovanni, and to my little sister, Elena “La televisiun, la g'ha na forsa de leun; la televisiun, la g'ha paura de nisun.” “Television is as strong as a lion; Television fears nobody.” Enzo Jannacci. La Televisiun.1975. Page intentionally left blank Table of Content Abstract 1 Preface: Television as A Cross-Media Techno-Cultural Form 2 1. Introduction - Cord-Cutting 101: A Revolution Has Begun 5 1.1. Changing Habits in a Changing Ecosystem 5 1.2. The Question of the Cord-Cutting Counterpublic 8 1.3. Methodology: Sources, Approach and Structure 11 1.4. Relevance 15 2. The Cutters within a Cross-Media Television Ecosystem 17 2.1. Re-working of the U.S. Television Distribution Platforms 18 2.2. Legitimating Newfound Watching Behaviours 23 2.3. Proactive Viewers, Cord-Killers, Digital Pirates: Here Come the Cord-Cutters 25 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Vividata Brands by Category
    Brand List 1 Table of Contents Television 3-9 Radio/Audio 9-13 Internet 13 Websites/Apps 13-15 Digital Devices/Mobile Phone 15-16 Visit to Union Station, Yonge Dundas 16 Finance 16-20 Personal Care, Health & Beauty Aids 20-28 Cosmetics, Women’s Products 29-30 Automotive 31-35 Travel, Uber, NFL 36-39 Leisure, Restaurants, lotteries 39-41 Real Estate, Home Improvements 41-43 Apparel, Shopping, Retail 43-47 Home Electronics (Video Game Systems & Batteries) 47-48 Groceries 48-54 Candy, Snacks 54-59 Beverages 60-61 Alcohol 61-67 HH Products, Pets 67-70 Children’s Products 70 Note: ($) – These brands are available for analysis at an additional cost. 2 TELEVISION – “Paid” • Extreme Sports Service Provider “$” • Figure Skating • Bell TV • CFL Football-Regular Season • Bell Fibe • CFL Football-Playoffs • Bell Satellite TV • NFL Football-Regular Season • Cogeco • NFL Football-Playoffs • Eastlink • Golf • Rogers • Minor Hockey League • Shaw Cable • NHL Hockey-Regular Season • Shaw Direct • NHL Hockey-Playoffs • TELUS • Mixed Martial Arts • Videotron • Poker • Other (e.g. Netflix, CraveTV, etc.) • Rugby Online Viewing (TV/Video) “$” • Skiing/Ski-Jumping/Snowboarding • Crave TV • Soccer-European • Illico • Soccer-Major League • iTunes/Apple TV • Tennis • Netflix • Wrestling-Professional • TV/Video on Demand Binge Watching • YouTube TV Channels - English • Vimeo • ABC Spark TELEVISION – “Unpaid” • Action Sports Type Watched In Season • Animal Planet • Auto Racing-NASCAR Races • BBC Canada • Auto Racing-Formula 1 Races • BNN Business News Network • Auto
    [Show full text]
  • Newton, Gabriel and Jim, Please See Attached for the Presentation
    Message From: Moyse, Brandon [[email protected]] Sent: 3/26/2014 11:17:58 PM To: Glassman, Newton [[email protected]]; De Alba, Gabriel [[email protected]]; Riley, Jim [email protected]] CC: Michaud, Zach [[email protected]]; Moyse, Brandon [[email protected]] Subject: Canadian government presentation Attachments: 14-03-27 Presentation.pdf Newton, Gabriel and Jim, Please see attached for the presentation for tomorrow's discussion. Best regards, Brandon Brandon Moyse The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. 77 King Street West, North Tower, Suite 432 0 Toronto, ON M5K 1J3 T: 416.945.3015 F: 416.945.3060 E: [email protected] sender ln:n-:~:~dbtely ;~ nd d e ~~tn;y ~·h i s e ~ n - ~ail . Do not c:,::.py, u ::~~~ vf d hK::k~s': ~ f-+~ . -s• --n::~ ~ ! E-·rne:l! t.r.anstniM!on ~>1r-:n0t. t:-':~ 9u;~rc:nt e~~~ d t c: b ~:l ~~~~cun~ ci· en-or fn:~e , e: r:d the ~~e ntk:: do B~~ nc·t 8 C <..{:::p~ H ~Jb l Ht y !or an~' {:.: rr•;:- ~~ c·r Q rnis~. i c:ns ln the co nk~ nts or Ln::~ :ness~)9e v·;hicn n-1(::y ~:;ris:i.: dB ~ result of t:::~n-t<~, H L: <.) nsrnlssk.m. CCG0011564 CCG0011565 Overview • The decision and action timelines have tightened following Mobilicity's March 21, 2014, court ruling Mobilicity has obtained Court approval to complete the sales process by April 30, 2014 Vimpelcom has written down its investment in WIND Canada from $1.2 billion to $0 Catalyst is in advanced discussion with Vimpelcom to gain control of WIND Canada but the process is tight on time • Mobilicity and its creditors (other than Catalyst)
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Choice in Political News
    Consumer choice in political news Marc Trussler Master's Thesis Department of Political Science McGill University Montreal,Quebec May 2013 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree Master's of Arts c Marc Trussler 2013 Abstract This thesis is concerned with the role that consumer demand for news plays in political behaviour. While a great deal of study has been done to examine media supply, very little has looked into the other side of the equation. If we are interested in the distortions media creates, than part of that equation must be a concern with what types of news individuals select { particularly in the 21st century context of a \high-choice" media-environment. I examine this problem through a new experimental method designed to overcome shortcomings in the existing research. Previous studies have focused their methodologies primarily on achieving generalizability, while the method here seeks to find a better balance with internal validity. I use this method to tackle two different areas: demand for negative and strategic news (Experiment One); and demand for news that confirms test-subjects ideological and partisan biases (Experiment Two). Both studies produce significant results that bolster confidence in this new methodology. ii R´esum´e Ce m´emoiretraite du r^oledes demandes des consommateurs au niveau des nouvelles et la relation avec le comportement politique. Alors que plusieurs tudes ont trait´ede loffre m´ediatique,peu se sont int´eress´ees`alautre c^ot´ede la m´edaille. Si nous sommes int´eresssaux distorsions cr´e´eespar les m´edias,il faut ´evidemment ´etudierle type de nou- velles que les individus s´electionnent.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseball,” 2016-2019
    Description of document: Informal complaints received by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) which include the word “BASEBALL,” 2016-2019 Requested date: 01-November-2019 Release date: 26-November-2019 Posted date: 27-July-2020 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Request Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A836 Washington, D.C. 20554 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site, and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Federal Communications Commission Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Washington, D.C. 20554 tfltJ:J November 26, 2019 FOIA Nos. 2020-061 and 2020-062 This letter responds to your recent Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") requests received by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") and assigned to the Consumer & Governmental Affairs ("CGB") and Enforcement ("EB") Bureaus.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Citizens Against Nuclear Danger 810316 Filing Re Discovery
    March 25, 'l981 " UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKETED USNRC BEFORE AND LICENSING BOARD THE ATOMIC SAFETY MAR27>9.81 ';— '-1c Office of the secre'gy Docke',in' Servm Branch ) ) PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO. ) and ) Docket Nos. 50-387 ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.) 50-388 ) (Susquehanna Steam Electric Station,) Units 1 and 2) ) APPLICANTS'ESPONSE TO "CITIZENS AGAINST NUCLEAR DANGERS STATEMENTS AND MOTION CONCERNING DISCOVERY, SUMMARY DISPOSITION AND EX PARTE ACTION" In a filing dated March 16, 1981, Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers ("CAND") attacks a number ot unrelated actions e~l Applicants, the Licensing Board, and the Staff. CAN p II'fI g arguments are dealt with below. ppp 068 lolV. 11 s Wam+ ~ cogMtss to>i I. DISCOVERY In the first part of its filing, CAND objects to t Staff's January 30, 1981 motion to compel and the Board's February 27, 1981 order compelling discovery. Since CAND indicates that it "will respond under protest to the directive of the Board prior to the stated deadline", its objection is moot. However, CAND's filing again +0~ indicates its apparent unwillingness to comply with the 5 requirements of discovery. CAND has raised certain (( contentions in this proceeding. Applicants and the Staff have sought through discovery to ascertain the basis for Sx040ro r 2 A I 1% /' d these contentions. CAND now states The Citizens have no information to reveal at this time, because of lack of knowledge. CAND Statements and Motion, p. 2. As the Appeal Board has stated in this proceeding: A lit'igant may not make serious allegations [i.e.
    [Show full text]