DOCSLIB.ORG

Samuel Arnold, a Lincoln Conspirator Part II by Percy E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Samuel Arnold, a Lincoln Conspirator Part II by Percy E `History' Trails I C C..', 1_J NI 7 -'''-`,. .;.'ES.F.ABLISL-ILT3 t-; 1 6 5 Et Baltimore County Historical Society r ,. ,.,„,_,- This publication is indexed in the PERfodical Source Index published by Agriculture Building the Allen County Public Library 9811 Van Buren Lane Foundation (PERSI). Cockeysville, Md. 21030 ISSN 0889-6186 Editors: JOHN W. McGRAIN and WILLIAM HOLLIFIELD VOL. 25 WINTER 1990-1991 NO. 2 Baltimorean in Big Trouble: Samuel Arnold, A Lincoln Conspirator Part II by Percy E. Martin Taken in by all of this and warmly laced with wine and tobacco, Arnold sat with Booth reminiscing about old times when there came a knock at the door. Michael O'Laughlin, an old Exeter Street boyhood friend of Booth's, was welcomed and introduced to Arnold. Samuel Arnold, who stated later that Booth knew nothing of his politics, nor he of Booth's, learned that Booth and O'Laughlin were involved in a secret project aimed at aiding the dying South. The three had already risked their lives in separate endeavors to serve the Southern cause. O'Laughlin, like Arnold, had been a private in the Maryland Confederate forces. John Wilkes Booth had par- ticipated in various subversive programs, particularly the smuggling of medicinal drugs south.29 Booth broached the main subject. Attrition and unrelenting Union assaults had depleted the southern ranks. Ulysses S. Grant had stopped the exchange of prisoners, because it aided the numerically inferior South. A way had been ascertained as a sure fire pressure to restart the exchanges. President Lincoln would be "cap- tured" by Booth in Washington, with others aiding, and be spirited across the lines to be presented as a war-saving blessing to the leader- ship in Richmond. The South, with Mr. Lincoln as a hostage, could force the release of thousands of southern prisoners of war. This scheme, so hazardous in its concept to all of the participants (in- —Library of Congress cluding the unwilling one-to-be: Mr. Lincoln), was somehow Samuel Bland Arnold posed for photographer Alexander Gardner painted to his young listeners, by the suave stage-trained speaker, as next to the turret of the Monitor Saugus in 1865. a "piece of cake." It would be simple, according to Booth, to lay in wait on the Seventh Street Road and waylay the foolishly careless leader as he rode out on one of his frequent visits, unescorted, to stay visited others who were involved in his plans. These included overnight at the Soldiers' Home. Arnold was eventually persuaded southern spies and saboteurs, who were generally cooperative in the by Booth to join for patriotic reasons, although the excitement of the endeavor. Samuel, who was spending more and more time at the challenge was certainly a consideration. There would be time enough Hookstown scene, never heard from the leader until early later to regret his acceptance of the bonds of commitment that the September. Arnold was helping to harvest some grain at the farm of three sealed, before parting, with an oath of allegiance to the scheme Julius Gehrmann—in the area of what is now Reisterstown Road that prescribed death to the faint or treacherous heart.30 (The story near Belvedere Avenue. His brother William brought him a letter of the various Booth machinations has filled shelves of books, so it from the post office postmarked with a location in the oil regions of must be curtailed here. Arnold's role and that of O'Laughlin never Pennsylvania. It contained a 20-dollar bill and instructions from became important and was strictly concerned with the abduction Booth for Arnold and O'Laughlin. Samuel let out a whoop, and phase.) brandishing the bill, said, "I'm flush." This was remembered by After the breakup of the meeting, Booth journeyed north for another harvester, L. P. D. Newman, and was reported later at the some innocent social meetings with his family members and then Conspiracy Trial. PAGE 6 HISTORY TRAILS WINTER 1990-1991 With O'Laughlin, Arnold, in a newly purchased buggy, as per in- structions, drove to Washington where they "holed up" in a cheap hotel and met only rarely with the fleeting organizer Booth. They learned from Booth the existence of several others more active in the plot, principally: a southern blockade runner and courier, John H. Surratt, Jr.; a former Mosby guerilla fighter, Lewis Thornton Powell, also known as Lewis Payne; a Port Tobacco boatman who regularly crossed the Potomac on southern projects, George A. Atzerodt; and a young Washingtonian, David Herold, whose duck hunting pro- clivity made him invaluable for his knowledge of the Potomac shore. There were other Southern-leaning persons who aided the project, although they often knew only that they were, ostensibly, furthering the Confederate war effort. This last group included Mrs. Mary Sur- ma, mother of John; Dr. Samuel Mudd, who lived in Charles Coun- ty; and Edman Spangler, who worked at Ford's Theatre.32 Nothing of importance happened until the night of March 15, 1865, when all the principals were gathered by Booth for a secret meeting at a back room in Gautier's Restaurant on Pennyslvania Avenue. Booth, who had been stymied by the fact that prominent people in government had finally prevailed upon the President to use a military guard in his rides away from the White House, un- —photo by J. W. McGrain, 1985 veiled a new plan that would use Ford's Theatre as the place of the Feelemeyer's Store, where the Arnolds picked up their mail and planned abduction. Lincoln often went there under minimum caught the Hookstown Road coach, stood until 1985 at 5 302 Reister- security to indulge his love of the dramatic stage. For Booth, who town Road. Last used as a barbecued-rib restaurant, it had been had unlimited access, it seemed a natural alternative. Others renamed "The Five Mile House" for a turnpike inn that once stood disagreed, including Arnold. Citing the dangers and his right to a in the block to the south. fair chance of survival, Samuel then launched into a criticism of delays and lost opportunities, threatening to quit in a week if from his mother he had gone out with you, and had not something concrete didn't happen. Booth was incensed, and returned. I concluded, therefore, he had gone with you. How threatened Arnold with death under the terms of the oath. Arnold, inconsiderate you have been! When I left you, you stated we the combat veteran, promised Booth retaliation. Surratt then asked would not meet in a month or so. Therefore, I made applica- what would come of the scheme if they failed to drag the former tion for employment, an answer to which I shall receive dur- wrestler of New Salem from the theatre, to which Booth responded ing the week. I told my parents I had ceased with you. Can I, that he would know what to do. The ominousness of this hint by then, under existing circumstances, come as you request? You Booth was not lost on any of the participants. The meeting broke up know full well that the G---t suspicions something is going on on a note of confusion and indecision.33 there; therefore, the undertaking is becoming more com- Arnold and several others would have been through with the kid- plicated. Why not, for the present, desist, for various reasons, nap plot, except that something occurred that got it all going again. which, if you look into, you can readily see, without my mak- Word was received that the President was going to attend a play for ing any mention thereof. You, nor anyone, can censure me the sick and wounded soldiers at Campbell Hospital, just outside the for my present course. You have been its cause, for how can I city on the Seventh Street Road. The principal conspirators were now come after telling them I had left you? Suspicion rests alerted, and a party was gotten up to intercept the vehicle on a lonely upon me now from my whole family, and even parties in the stretch of road. (Somehow they had learned that there was to be no county. I will be compelled to leave home anyhow, and how guard along this time.) The attempt was made on March 17. Later, soon I care not. None, no not one, were more in favor of the John Surratt said that the mounted conspirators approached the car- enterprise than myself, and today would be there, had you riage and peered inside only to find someone other than the Presi- not done as you have—by this I mean, manner of proceeding. dent. This apparently didn't disturb the carriage's occupant or I am, as you well know, in need. I am, you may say, in rags, driver, and Booth with his party continued on toward the hospital. whereas today I ought to be well clothed. I do not feel right They stopped at a restaurant, and Booth, alone, entered the hospital stalking about with means, and more from appearances a beg- grounds to inquire if the President had arrived. He was told by one gar. I feel my dependence; but even all this would and was of the actors that the President was not expected. Fearful that their forgotten, for I was one with you. Time more propitious will plans had been discovered, the conspirators returned to the city in a arrive yet. Do not act rashly or in haste. I would prefer your panic. Arnold did not stop until he reached Hookstown.34 first query, "go and see how it will be taken at R----d," and Booth, who later tried to bring Arnold back into the project, sent ere long I shall be better prepared to again be with you.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Flimsy Case Against Mary Surratt: the Judicial Murder of One
    The Flimsy Case Against Mary Surratt: The Judicial Murder of One of the Accused Lincoln Assassination Conspirators Michael T. Griffith 2019 @All Rights Reserved On June 30, 1865, an illegal military tribunal found Mrs. Mary Surratt guilty of conspiring with John Wilkes Booth and others to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln, and sentenced her to death by hanging. Despite numerous appeals to commute her sentence to life in prison, she was hung seven days later on July 7. She was the first woman ever to be executed by the federal government. The evidence that the military commission used as the basis for its verdict was flimsy and entirely circumstantial. Even worse, the War Department’s prosecutors withheld evidence that indicated Mrs. Surratt did not know that Booth intended to shoot President Lincoln. The prosecutors also refused to allow testimony that would have seriously impeached one of the two chief witnesses against her. Mary Surratt John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln’s assassin. He shot President Lincoln at Ford’s Theatre in Washington on April 14, 1865. The military tribunal claimed that Mary Surratt: * Knew about the assassination plot and failed to report it * On April 11, 1865, told John Lloyd that the “shooting irons” (rifles) that had been delivered to him would be needed soon 1 * An April 14, the day of the assassination, gave Lloyd a package from Booth and told him to have the rifles ready that night * Falsely claimed that she did not recognize Lewis Payne (Lewis Powell) when he showed up at her boarding house on April 17 * Falsely claimed that her youngest son, John Surratt, was not in Washington on the day of the assassination Two Plots: Kidnapping and Assassination Before we begin to examine the military commission’s case against Mary Surratt, we need to understand that Booth initiated two separate plots against Lincoln.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Surratt: the Unfortunate Story of Her Conviction and Tragic Death
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita History Class Publications Department of History 2013 Mary Surratt: The nforU tunate Story of Her Conviction and Tragic Death Leah Anderson Ouachita Baptist University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/history Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Leah, "Mary Surratt: The nforU tunate Story of Her Conviction and Tragic Death" (2013). History Class Publications. 34. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/history/34 This Class Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Class Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mary Surratt: The Unfortunate Story of Her Conviction and Tragic Death Leah Anderson 1 On the night of April 14th, 1865, a gunshot was heard in the balcony of Ford’s Theatre followed by women screaming. A shadowy figure jumped onto the stage and yelled three now-famous words, “Sic semper tyrannis!” which means, “Ever thus to the tyrants!”1 He then limped off the stage, jumped on a horse that was being kept for him at the back of the theatre, and rode off into the moonlight with an unidentified companion. A few hours later, a knock was heard on the door of the Surratt boarding house. The police were tracking down John Wilkes Booth and his associate, John Surratt, and they had come to the boarding house because it was the home of John Surratt. An older woman answered the door and told the police that her son, John Surratt, was not at home and she did not know where he was.
    [Show full text]
  • The History Page: Lincoln's Female 'Assassin'
    The History Page: Lincoln’s female ‘assassin’ Housekeeper Mary Surratt is hanged for conspiracy on flimsy evidence Photo: Corbis By Rob Ogden, Saturday, August 6, 2011, The Daily, http://bit.ly/ogbWUD More than 1,000 people watched as Mary Surratt, a handsome widow and mother of three, stood on a trapdoor with a noose around her neck. Abraham Lincoln had been assassinated just three months earlier, and Surratt had been convicted of conspiring to kill him. Despite her pleas of innocence, U.S. authorities took her to the gallows, put a noose around her neck and pulled the lever. Surratt became the first woman executed by the U.S. government on July 7, 1865. Though convicted of treason, she insisted on her innocence until her death, and evidence suggests that she was, in fact, uninvolved with the Lincoln assassination plot. Tragedy had followed Mary her whole life, beginning with her father’s death in 1825, when she was 2 years old. Her mother ran the family affairs well and put Mary through Catholic boarding school near her home in Waterloo, Md. She grew into a comely young woman with dark hair, high cheekbones and large, mournful eyes. She befriended the local priest and became devoutly Catholic. Perhaps for lack of fatherly guidance, she married at 16 to a man named John Surratt, who had a troublesome background including financial problems and an illegitimate child he’d fathered the year before. But things started off well enough: Between 1841 and 1844, Mary had three children: Isaac, Elizabeth and John Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Hatching Execution: Andrew Johnson and the Hanging of Mary Surratt
    Hatching Execution: Andrew Johnson and the Hanging of Mary Surratt Sarah Westad History 489: Research Seminar December 2015 Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin Eau Claire with the consent of the author. Contents Abstract iii Figures iv Introduction 1 Historiography 10 Primary Source Analysis 22 Conclusion 33 Works Cited 35 ii Abstract In 1865, the American Civil War and the assassination of US President Abraham Lincoln plunged the country into a state of panic. Federal officials quickly took to the ranks, imprisoning hundreds of suspected rebels believed to be involved in the assassination. Ultimately, only eight individuals, dubbed conspirators, were prosecuted and charged with murdering the Commander- in-Chief. During their trials, new president Andrew Johnson voiced grave concern over one particular conspirator, middle-aged Catholic widow Mary Surratt. As the mother of escaped conspirator, John Surratt, Johnson viewed Mrs. Surratt as an individual that needed to be treated with a particular urgency, resulting in a series of events that led to Mrs. Surratt’s execution, less than three months after the assassination, on July 7, 1865. This paper analyzes the actions of Johnson and considers the American public’s responses to Mary Surratt’s hanging. Additionally, this paper looks at the later writings of Andrew Johnson in order to gain an understanding of his feelings on Mrs. Surratt in the weeks, months, and years after her execution, as well as
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Surratt
    CONSPIRATORS and the MILITARY COMMISSION 0. CONSPIRATORS and the MILITARY COMMISSION - Story Preface 1. MARY SURRATT 2. EVENTS at the SURRATT BOARDINGHOUSE 3. JOHN WILKES BOOTH and HIS PLANS 4. CAPTURE and DEATH of JOHN WILKES BOOTH 5. CONSPIRATORS and the MILITARY COMMISSION 6. FREDERICK AIKEN and the TRIAL of MARY SURRATT 7. EXECUTION of MARY SURRATT 8. AFTER THE CONSPIRACY TRIAL Mary Surratt and the other so-called "Lincoln Conspirators" were tried by a military commission, not by a jury of their peers. This contemporary image depicts the defendants, at the top of the picture, with Mrs. Surratt on the right side. Image online, Wikimedia Commons. While the soldiers were at Mary Surratt’s boardinghouse, the night of April 17, someone else knocked on the door. It was a disheveled-appearing man with a pick-axe in hand. Who was he? What did he want at that hour of the night? Inviting him in, the officer-in-charge asked the visitor about the purpose of his visit. He said he was checking with Mrs. Surratt, to see what time she wanted him to dig a gutter the next morning. Doubting the man was telling the truth, the officer summoned Mrs. Surratt. She swore she did not know him. After finding pictures of John Wilkes Booth - and Confederate generals - in the house, the soldiers took no chances. They arrested the visitor - Lewis Powell (a/k/a Lewis Payne) - Mrs. Surratt, and several other boardinghouse residents. With John Wilkes Booth still at-large, investigators wanted to build an assassination-conspiracy case.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lincoln Assassination Connection
    The Lincoln Assassination Connection Germantown's link to the assassination of President Lincoln Germantown, MD By SUSAN SODERBERG April 23, 2011 Many of you who have seen the recent movie The Conspirator will know that George Andrew Atzerodt (alias Andrew Atwood), was one of the Lincoln assassination conspirators executed on July 7, 1865. Atzerodt was arrested in Germantown, the town where he had spent many years as a boy. How he got involved with the Booth gang and why he ended up back in Germantown is a compelling story. This story begins in 1844 when Atzerodt, age 9, arrives in Germantown with his family, immigrants from Prussia. His father, Henry Atzerodt, purchased land with his brother- in-law, Johann Richter, and together they built a house on Schaeffer Road. In the mid- 1850s, Henry sold his interest in the farm and moved to Westmoreland County, Va., where he operated a blacksmith shop until his untimely death around 1858. At this time Atzerodt and his brother John opened a carriage painting business in Port Tobacco, Md. After the Civil War broke out the carriage painting business was not doing well, so John went up to Baltimore and got employment as a detective with the State Provost Marshal's office. Atzerodt stayed on at Port Tobacco, but his main business was not painting carriages, it was blockade running and smuggling across the Potomac River. It was on one of these clandestine trips that he met John Surratt, son of Mary Surratt, who was acting as a courier for Confederate mail. In November 1864 Surratt convinced Atzerodt to join the group, led by John Wilkes Booth, planning to capture President Lincoln, take him to the South and hold him for ransom.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Weichmann, Louis J. a True History of the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln and of the Conspiracy of 1865. Edited by Floyd E
    Weichmann, Louis J. A True History of the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln and of the Conspiracy of 1865. Edited by Floyd E. Risvold. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1975. Chapter I, p. 3 Purpose, Military Commission, Conclusions correct, Assassination as crime against civilization, Booth did not immortalize Lincoln, Lincoln’s second inauguration, no Confederate or Catholic plot. Grand Review of Union troops in Washington Chapter II p. 11 Weichman’s early life, residents in Washington, moves to Philadelphia, public school education, St. Charles College, Howard County, Maryland, student for Catholic ministry, college life, meets John H. Surratt in September 1859, teaching in Washington in January 1863 Chapter III p. 18 St. Matthew’s Institute, John Surratt, Surratsville—meets Mrs. Mary E. Surratt; Surratt family, David E. Herald, St. Charles College, Little Texas, Maryland; Henry B. de Sainte Marie; Weichmann appointed War Department clerk; second visit to Surrattsville; War Department Rifles—Mrs. Surratt Moves to Washington, 541 H Street. Chapter IV p. 29 History to December 1864; Mrs. Surratt’s home in Washington, November- December 1864—accountability of Mary Surratt and son, lecture by John Surratt, Surratt works for Adams Express Company; meeting of Booth, Mudd, and Surratt in Washington, December 23, 1864, Interview at National Hotel; Booth purchase of Mudd Farm; Booth a frequent visitor to Mrs. Surratt’s house Chapter V p. 36 Parents of Booth; Junius Brutus Booth, tragedian, elder Booth married twice and came to U.S. in 1821; Booths lived in Hartford Country, Maryland; death of Junius Brutus Booth, Sr. in 1842; burial place; children; education of John Wilkes Booth; first employment; assists at execution of John Brown; plays in Richmond, 1861, first meeting with Lewis Powell who tried to assassinate Seward; plays with his brothers in New York, November 25, 1864; Booth’s reputation as actor Chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Harbin
    08-03-1884: George Alfred Townsend's Interview of Thomas Harbin Source: Cincinnati Enquirer, August 3, 1884. ​Thomas Harbin had once been the postmaster in Bryantown, Maryland, and worked as a Confederate spy in Southern Maryland during the Civil War. Journalist George Alfred Townsend interviewed him after Dr. Mudd died. “New York, August 1, 1884. The writer of this article was twenty-four years old when President Lincoln was murdered, and he heard the news of the assassination in Richmond, Virginia, while still the charred documents of the disbanded Confederate government were lying in the gutters of that town. Returning to Washington, the writer became acquainted with most of the detectives assembled from the different cities of the country, or in the employ of the government, who were ferreting out the crime. He attended the trial of the conspirators, and saw four of them hanged; he was acquainted with John Wilkes Booth, the contriver of the tragedy; and the principal witness of the government – inhabitant of the house of Mrs. Surratt – was his schoolmate, John Yates Beall, who was hanged on Governor's Island not many weeks before President Lincoln's murder, and whose execution has been said to have precipitated the assassination, the writer also saw hanged. As years drifted by, in the midst of a busy and changeful life, the writer found no event to touch his imagination and historical zeal so much as Booth's crime. Circumstances within the past two or three years have brought the writer into relations with the chief witnesses and associates of the conspiracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Surratt
    ________________________________________________________________________ VOLUME XXVIII NUMBER 5 NEWSLETTER MAY 2009 ________________________________________________________________________ MAY MEETING DATE: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 PLACE: The Lyceum, 201 South Washington Street, Alexandria, Virginia TIME: 7:30 PM SPEAKER: Elizabeth Steger Trindal, Author Mary Surratt: An American Tragedy In commemoration of the Bicentennial of Abraham Lincoln, Elizabeth Steger Trindal, author of Mary Surratt: An American Tragedy , will tell the controversial story of Mary Surratt . On July 7, 1865, Mary Elizabeth Jenkins Surratt was hanged as one of the alleged conspirators in the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln. She was born in 1823 near what is now Clinton, Maryland. From November 26, 1835, until 1839, she attended the Academy for Young Ladies, which was affiliated with St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Alexandria. The Academy was located at the corner of Duke and Fairfax Streets. It closed in 1839, and the building eventually was demolished for a parking lot. Ms. Trindal’s talk will encompass Mary Surratt’s years at the academy; her unhappy marriage to John Surratt; her children; her life during the Civil War; the death of her husband; her move to Washington, DC; establishing a boarding house on H Street; meeting John Wilkes Booth; the death of the President; her arrest; her trial; and finally her execution. Ms. Trindal argues that Mary Surratt was innocent. Elizabeth Steger Trindal was born in Alexandria, and is a long-time member of the Alexandria Historical Society. Prior to her husband’s retirement as an engineer at Fort Belvoir, she lived near Mount Vernon, but she currently lives in the Shenandoah Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dahlgren Affair and the Lincoln Assassination
    THE DAHLGREN AFFAIR AND THE LINCOLN ASSASSINATION William Bryant Monday, October 23, 2017 Christopher Wren Association 1 BACKGROUND Thanks for intro & coming, scheduled last fall, etc. Glad for the opportunity to present a chapter of US history virtually unknown. Debated doing 1-day, 2 hrs vs 3-days, 6 hrs: Not all can attend 6 hrs and conspriracy story so complex with people and events, thread of story might be lost in details. 2 hrs should be enough time to connect the dots →→Presentation on website, books on table 2 www.wm.edu/cwa “course information” “class notes & presentations” [email protected] 3 THREE REFERENCES ON TABLE William Tidwell, Come Retribution: The Confederate Secret Service and the Assassination of Lincoln, 1988. Edward Steers, Jr., Blood on the Moon: The Assassination of Abraham Lincoln, 2001. Edward Steers, Jr. (ed.), The Trial: The Assassination of President Lincoln and the Trial of the Conspirators, 2003. 4 BACKGROUND More written about AL than any other American, always ends with assassination by crazed actor. Recent research by several serious scholars has determined is not accurate—true story once known been lost to history by design. Problem: historical accurate works not widely read, serious historians just writing to each other. 5 BACKGROUND Good scholarship depends on primary sources, sources of the period. But as you will hear, majority of relevant primary sources, but the scholars’ conclusions are indisputable. Objective today: For you to leave believing what I say is historically accurate and wet your appetite to learn more of a topic still relevant today. 6 →HOUR 1 →BACKGROUND 7 HOUR 1 THE DAHLGREN AFFAIR 8 BACKGROUND 9 STONEMAN’S RAID Story begins May 1-3, 1863, with Chancellorsville, Lee’s greatest victory, thanks to Jackson who was mortally wounded by own troops.
    [Show full text]
  • A Abe Lincoln
    AB01eIndex.qxp 2/21/2006 2:18 PM Page 455 Index A charges against, 337-39 Abe Lincoln: His Speeches and execution, 358-61 Writings, 35 meets Booth, 175-76, 185, 205 abolitionists, 57, 104, 160 role in failed abduction, 210-12 A Constitutional View of the Late Atzerodt, John, 184, 316 War Between the States, 50 Augur, Christopher, 273 Adam’s Express Company, 154, 178 B The Age of Hate, 123 Baden, Joseph, 284, 291 Aiken, Frederick, 332 Bainbridge, Absalom, 286, 290 Alexander, Sam, 172 Baker, Elizabeth, 81 The American Bastille, 56 Baker, Lafayette C. American Colonization Society, 34 pursuit and capture of Booth, American System, 31, 33, 65 291-98, 311 America’s Most Wanted, 443 secret papers, 71-96, 101, 113, America’s Two Just Wars, 33 117-18 Anderson, Mary Jane, 237 spies on Johnson, 122-23, 206, Angle, Paul M., 36 213, 250 Antonelli, Cardinal, 387 Baker, Luther Byron, 80 Arnold, Samuel Bland, 136 pursuit and capture of Booth, arrest and trial, 321-43 279-305 meets Booth, 139-45, 157, 177, Baker, Mary, 80-82 186-87, 190, 202-3 Baltimore American, 410 resigns from conspiracy, 211 Bangor Democrat, 60 sends “Sam” letter, 217 Banks, Nathaniel, 108 sentence, 343-46 Barnes, Dr. Charles K., 393, 446 Arsenal Building, 321-22 Barnes, Joseph K., 309, 311, 412 Ashley, J. M., 235, 393 Barnum’s Hotel, 139, 141, 183 Atkinson, F. C., 396 Basler, Roy P., 35 Atzerodt, George Bates, David, 397 arrest, 316 Bates, Edward, 319-20 biography, 184-86 Bates, Finis Langdon, 418-19 455 AB01eIndex.qxp 2/21/2006 2:18 PM Page 456 456 ABRAHAM LINCOLN’S EXECUTION friendship with John St.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 2004, Volume 99, Issue No. 1
    A/^A SC SftSl-)-^ HALL OF RECORDS LIBRARY Spring 2004 A .\ ANI^P0Lifr|MAR<LAND j AND Historical Magazine / ^HL/^HH V ^ ^^^H • •L^ V • ^5 ^E ^^^L y W ^H w 1 * ** 1 T THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY Founded 1844 Dennis A. Fiori, Director The Maryland Historical Magazine Robert I. Cottom, Editor Patricia Dockman Anderson, Managing Editor David Prencipe, Photographer Robin Donaldson Coblentz, Christopher T. George, lane Gushing Lange, and Mary Markey, Editorial Associates Regional Editors John B. Wiseman, Frostburg State University lane G. Sween, Montgomery County Historical Society Pegram lohnson III, Accoceek, Maryland Acting as an editorial board, the Publications Committee of the Maryland Historical Society oversees and supports the magazine staff. Members of the committee are: lean H. Baker, Goucher College; Trustee/Chair lohn S. Bainbridge Ir., Baltimore County lames H. Bready, Baltimore Sun Robert J. Brugger, The lohns Hopkins University Press Lois Green Carr, St. Mary's City Commission Suzanne E. Chapelle, Morgan State University Toby L. Ditz, The lohns Hopkins University Dennis A. Fiori, Maryland Historical Society, ex-officio David G. Fogle, University of Maryland lack G. Goellner, Baltimore Roland C. McConnell, Morgan State University Norvell E. Miller III, Baltimore Charles W. Mitchell, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins John W. Mitchell, Upper Marlboro lean B. Russo, Annapolis Bruce Thompson, Frederick Community College Members Emeritus Samuel Hopkins, Baltimore Charles McC. Mathias, Chevy Chase The Maryland Historical Magazine welcomes submissions from authors and letters to the editor. Letters may be edited for space and clarity. All articles will be acknowledged, but only those accompanied by a stamped, self-addressed envelope will be returned.
    [Show full text]