Introduction to Treble Clef General Music Mr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction to Treble Clef General Music Mr INTRODUCTION TO TREBLE CLEF GENERAL MUSIC MR. COACCI HIGHER VOICES, INSTRUMENTS, AND PARTS OF INSTRUMENTS, PLAY IN THE TREBLE CLEF HIGH VOICES :Soprano, mezzosoprano, alto, countertenor HIGH BRASS: trumpet, French horn HIGH WOODWIND: piccolo, flute, oboe, clarinet, saxophone HIGH STRINGS: violin, viola, guitar HIGHER VOICES, INSTRUMENTS, AND PARTS OF INSTRUMENTS, PLAY IN THE TREBLE CLEF The right side of the piano is in treble clef. Most of the time, pianists read notes for the right hand in the treble clef. THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE PIANO IS IN TREBLE CLEF. MOST OF THE TIME, PIANISTS READ NOTES FOR THE RIGHT HAND IN TREBLE CLEF. Going higher ---> <--- Going lower ----> Going higher Going lower <---- PITCHES GET HIGHER AS YOU MOVE UP ON THE STAFF AND LOWER AS YOU MOVE DOWN ON THE STAFF LET’S LOOK AT THE “LINE” NOTES OF THE TREBLE CLEF THE 1ST LINE NOTE OF THE TREBLE CLEF IS “E” THE 2ND LINE NOTE OF THE TREBLE CLEF IS “G” THE 3RD LINE NOTE OF THE TREBLE CLEF IS “B” G THE 4TH LINE NOTE OF THE TREBLE CLEF IS “D” G THE 5TH LINE NOTE OF THE TREBLE CLEF IS “F” G YOU CAN MEMORIZE THE LINE NOTES OF THE TREBLE CLEF WITH THIS SENTENCE: “TREBLE LINES, EVERY GOOD BOY DOES FINE” G B D F A (Go (boys) (deserve) (fine) (apples) IN BETWEEN THE “LINE” NOTES ARE “SPACE” NOTES THE 1ST SPACE NOTE OF THE TREBLE CLEF IS “F” THE 2ND SPACE NOTE OF THE TREBLE CLEF IS “A” THE 3RD SPACE NOTE OF THE TREBLE CLEF IS “C” THE 4TH SPACE NOTE OF THE TREBLE CLEF IS “E” YOU DON’T EVEN NEED TO MEMORIZE A SENTENCE FOR THE SPACE NOTES, BECAUSE THEY SPELL “FACE” FROM BOTTOM TO TOP. TREBLE LINES: EVERY GOOD BOY DOES FINE TREBLE SPACE: FACE YOU CAN EVEN SPELL OUT WORDS IN THE TREBLE CLEF (USING A, B, C, D, E, F, AND G) IF YOU IDENTIFY THE NOTES FROM LEFT TO RIGHT, THEY MAKE WORDS. Can you figure out the words? YOU CAN EVEN SPELL OUT WORDS IN THE TREBLE CLEF (USING A, B, C, D, E, F, AND G) IF YOU IDENTIFY THE NOTES FROM LEFT TO RIGHT, THEY MAKE WORDS. A G E B E A D.
Recommended publications
  • The Journal of the Viola Da Gamba Society Text Has Been Scanned With
    The Journal of the Viola da Gamba Society Text has been scanned with OCR and is therefore searchable. The format on screen does not conform with the printed Chelys. The original page numbers have been inserted within square brackets: e.g. [23]. Where necessary footnotes here run in sequence through the whole article rather than page by page and replace endnotes. The pages labelled ‘The Viola da Gamba Society Provisional Index of Viol Music’ in some early volumes are omitted here since they are up- dated as necessary as The Viola da Gamba Society Thematic Index of Music for Viols, ed. Gordon Dodd and Andrew Ashbee, 1982-, available on-line at www.vdgs.org.uk or on CD-ROM. Each item has been bookmarked: go to the ‘bookmark’ tab on the left. To avoid problems with copyright, some photographs have been omitted. Volume 19 (1990) (Editor: Lynn Hulse) Ian Payne The Provision of Teaching on Viols at some English Cathedral Churches, c. 1594 – c. 1645: Archival Evidence Chelys, vol. 19 (1990), pp. 3-15 Robert Thompson The Sources of Locke’s Consort ‘for seaverall friends’ Chelys, vol. 19 (1990), pp. 16-43 Carl Hugo Ågren The use of Higher Positions on the Treble Viol. Chelys, vol. 19 (1990), pp. 44-54 Dietrich Kessler A Seven-String Bass Viol by Michel Colichon Chelys, vol. 19 (1990), pp. 55-62 Letters, pp.63-4 Obituaries (Robert Donington; Marco Pallis), pp. 65-69 Reviews, pp. 70-80 [3] THE PROVISION OF TEACHING ON THE VIOLS AT SOME ENGLISH CATHEDRAL CHURCHES, c. 1594-c.1645: ARCHIVAL EVIDENCE IAN PAYNE This paper is intended to supplement an earlier article outlining the archival evidence for a viol-playing tradition at Trinity College, Cambridge, c.1594-c.1615.1 Like its predecessor, it is based on doctoral research among the administrative archives of selected institutions (of which only Ely, Lincoln, and Peterborough Cathedrals and York Minster are relevant to the present paper)2 and is concerned with the evidence for the provision of viols by the authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Treble Voices in Choral Music
    loft is shown by the absence of the con• gregation: Bach and Maria Barbara were Treble Voices In Choral Music: only practicing and church was not even in session! WOMEN, MEN, BOYS, OR CASTRATI? There were certain places where wo• men were allowed to perform reltgious TIMOTHY MOUNT in a "Gloria" and "Credo" by Guillaume music: these were the convents, cloisters, Legrant in 1426. Giant choir books, large and religious schools for girls. Nuns were 2147 South Mallul, #5 enough for an entire chorus to see, were permitted to sing choral music (obvious• Anaheim, California 92802 first made in Italy in the middle and the ly, for high voices only) among them• second half of the 15th century. In selves and even for invited audiences. England, choral music began about 1430 This practice was established in the with the English polyphonic carol. Middle Ages when the music was limited Born in Princeton, New Jersey, Timo• to plainsong. Later, however, polyphonic thy Mount recently received his MA in Polyphonic choral music took its works were also performed. __ On his musi• choral conducting at California State cue from and developed out of the cal tour of Italy in 1770 Burney describes University, Fullerton, where he was a stu• Gregorian unison chorus; this ex• several conservatorios or music schools dent of Howard Swan. Undergraduate plains why the first choral music in Venice for girls. These schools must work was at the University of Michigan. occurs in the church and why secular not be confused with the vocational con• compositions are slow in taking up He has sung professionally with the opera servatories of today.
    [Show full text]
  • New International Manual of Braille Music Notation by the Braille Music Subcommittee World Blind Union
    1 New International Manual Of Braille Music Notation by The Braille Music Subcommittee World Blind Union Compiled by Bettye Krolick ISBN 90 9009269 2 1996 2 Contents Preface................................................................................ 6 Official Delegates to the Saanen Conference: February 23-29, 1992 .................................................... 8 Compiler’s Notes ............................................................... 9 Part One: General Signs .......................................... 11 Purpose and General Principles ..................................... 11 I. Basic Signs ................................................................... 13 A. Notes and Rests ........................................................ 13 B. Octave Marks ............................................................. 16 II. Clefs .............................................................................. 19 III. Accidentals, Key & Time Signatures ......................... 22 A. Accidentals ................................................................ 22 B. Key & Time Signatures .............................................. 22 IV. Rhythmic Groups ....................................................... 25 V. Chords .......................................................................... 30 A. Intervals ..................................................................... 30 B. In-accords .................................................................. 34 C. Moving-notes ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Keyboard Playing and the Mechanization of Polyphony in Italian Music, Circa 1600
    Keyboard Playing and the Mechanization of Polyphony in Italian Music, Circa 1600 By Leon Chisholm A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Music in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Kate van Orden, Co-Chair Professor James Q. Davies, Co-Chair Professor Mary Ann Smart Professor Massimo Mazzotti Summer 2015 Keyboard Playing and the Mechanization of Polyphony in Italian Music, Circa 1600 Copyright 2015 by Leon Chisholm Abstract Keyboard Playing and the Mechanization of Polyphony in Italian Music, Circa 1600 by Leon Chisholm Doctor of Philosophy in Music University of California, Berkeley Professor Kate van Orden, Co-Chair Professor James Q. Davies, Co-Chair Keyboard instruments are ubiquitous in the history of European music. Despite the centrality of keyboards to everyday music making, their influence over the ways in which musicians have conceptualized music and, consequently, the music that they have created has received little attention. This dissertation explores how keyboard playing fits into revolutionary developments in music around 1600 – a period which roughly coincided with the emergence of the keyboard as the multipurpose instrument that has served musicians ever since. During the sixteenth century, keyboard playing became an increasingly common mode of experiencing polyphonic music, challenging the longstanding status of ensemble singing as the paradigmatic vehicle for the art of counterpoint – and ultimately replacing it in the eighteenth century. The competing paradigms differed radically: whereas ensemble singing comprised a group of musicians using their bodies as instruments, keyboard playing involved a lone musician operating a machine with her hands.
    [Show full text]
  • Composers' Bridge!
    Composers’ Bridge Workbook Contents Notation Orchestration Graphic notation 4 Orchestral families 43 My graphic notation 8 Winds 45 Clefs 9 Brass 50 Percussion 53 Note lengths Strings 54 Musical equations 10 String instrument special techniques 59 Rhythm Voice: text setting 61 My rhythm 12 Voice: timbre 67 Rhythmic dictation 13 Tips for writing for voice 68 Record a rhythm and notate it 15 Ideas for instruments 70 Rhythm salad 16 Discovering instruments Rhythm fun 17 from around the world 71 Pitch Articulation and dynamics Pitch-shape game 19 Articulation 72 Name the pitches – part one 20 Dynamics 73 Name the pitches – part two 21 Score reading Accidentals Muddling through your music 74 Piano key activity 22 Accidental practice 24 Making scores and parts Enharmonics 25 The score 78 Parts 78 Intervals Common notational errors Fantasy intervals 26 and how to catch them 79 Natural half steps 27 Program notes 80 Interval number 28 Score template 82 Interval quality 29 Interval quality identification 30 Form Interval quality practice 32 Form analysis 84 Melody Rehearsal and concert My melody 33 Presenting your music in front Emotion melodies 34 of an audience 85 Listening to melodies 36 Working with performers 87 Variation and development Using the computer Things you can do with a Computer notation: Noteflight 89 musical idea 37 Sound exploration Harmony My favorite sounds 92 Harmony basics 39 Music in words and sentences 93 Ear fantasy 40 Word painting 95 Found sound improvisation 96 Counterpoint Found sound composition 97 This way and that 41 Listening journal 98 Chord game 42 Glossary 99 Welcome Dear Student and family Welcome to the Composers' Bridge! The fact that you are being given this book means that we already value you as a composer and a creative artist-in-training.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Read Choral Music.Pages
    ! How to Read Choral Music ! Compiled by Tim Korthuis Sheet music is a road map to help you create beautiful music. Please note that is only there as a guide. Follow the director for cues on dynamics (volume) and phrasing (cues and cuts). !DO NOT RELY ENTIRELY ON YOUR MUSIC!!! Only glance at it for words and notes. This ‘manual’ is a very condensed version, and is here as a reference. It does not include everything to do with reading music, only the basics to help you on your way. There may be !many markings that you wonder about. If you have questions, don’t be afraid to ask. 1. Where is YOUR part? • You need to determine whether you are Soprano or Alto (high or low ladies), or Tenor (hi men/low ladies) or Bass (low men) • Soprano is the highest note, followed by Alto, Tenor, (Baritone) & Bass Soprano NOTE: ! Alto If there is another staff ! Tenor ! ! Bass above the choir bracket, it is Bracket usually for a solo or ! ! ‘descant’ (high soprano). ! Brace !Piano ! ! ! • ! The Treble Clef usually indicates Soprano and Alto parts o If there are three notes in the Treble Clef, ask the director which section will be ‘split’ (eg. 1st and 2nd Soprano). o Music written solely for women will usually have two Treble Clefs. • ! The Bass Clef indicates Tenor, Baritone and Bass parts o If there are three parts in the Bass Clef, the usual configuration is: Top - Tenor, Middle - Baritone, Bottom – Bass, though this too may be ‘split’ (eg. 1st and 2nd Tenor) o Music written solely for men will often have two Bass Clefs, though Treble Clef is used for men as well (written 1 octave higher).
    [Show full text]
  • Ames High School Music Department Orchestra Course Level Expectations Grades 10-12 OR.PP Position/Posture OR.PP.1 Understands An
    Ames High School Music Department Orchestra Course Level Expectations Grades 10-12 OR.PP Position/Posture OR.PP.1 Understands and demonstrates appropriate playing posture without prompts OR.PP.2 Understands and demonstrates correct finger/hand position without prompts OR.AR Articulation OR.AR.1 Interprets and performs combinations of bowing at an advanced level [tie, slur, staccato, hooked bowings, loure (portato) bowing, accent, spiccato, syncopation, and legato] OR.AR.2 Interprets and performs Ricochet, Sul Ponticello, and Sul Tasto bowings at a beginning level OR.TQ Tone Quality OR.TQ.1 Produces a characteristic tone at the medium-advanced level OR.TQ.2 Defines and performs proper ensemble balance and blend at the medium-advanced level OR.RT Rhythm/Tempo OR.RT.1 Defines and performs rhythm patterns at the medium-advanced level (quarter note/rest, half note/rest, eighth note/rest, dotted eighth note, dotted half note, whole note/rest, dotted quarter note, sixteenth note) OR.RT.2 Defines and performs tempo markings at a medium-advanced level (Allegro, Moderato, Andante, Ritardando, Lento, Andantino, Maestoso, Andante Espressivo, Marziale, Rallantando, and Presto) OR.TE Technique OR.TE.1 Performs the pitches and the two-octave major scales for C, G, D, A, F, Bb, Eb; performs the pitches and the two-octave minor scales for A, E, D, G, C; performs the pitches and the one-octave chromatic scale OR.TE.2 Demonstrates and performs pizzicato, acro, and left-hand pizzicato at the medium-advanced level OR.TE.3 Demonstrates shifting at the intermediate
    [Show full text]
  • Plainchant Tradition*
    Some Observations on the "Germanic" Plainchant Tradition* By Alexander Blachly Anyone examining the various notational systems according to which medieval scribes committed the plainchant repertory to written form must be impressed both by the obvious relatedness of the systems and by their differences. There are three main categories: the neumatic notations from the ninth, tenth, and eleventh centuries (written without a staff and incapable, therefore, of indicating precise pitches);1 the quadratic nota­ tion in use in Italy, Spain, France, and England-the "Romanic" lands­ from the twelfth century on (this is the "traditional" plainchant notation, written usually on a four-line staff and found also in most twentieth­ century printed books, e.g., Liber usualis, Antiphonale monasticum, Graduale Romanum); and the several types of Germanic notation that use a staff but retain many of the features of their neumatic ancestors. The second and third categories descended from the first. The staffless neumatic notations that transmit the Gregorian repertory in ninth-, tenth-, and eleventh-century sources, though unlike one another in some important respects, have long been recognized as transmitting the same corpus of melodies. Indeed, the high degree of concordance between manuscripts that are widely separated by time and place is one of the most remarkable aspects the plainchant tradition. As the oldest method of notating chant we know,2 neumatic notation compels detailed study; and the degree to which the neumatic manuscripts agree not only • I would like to thank Kenneth Levy, Alejandro Plan chart, and Norman Smith for reading this article prior to publication and for making useful suggestions for its improve­ ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Arnold Schering on “Who Sang the Soprano and Alto Parts in Bach's
    Arnold Schering on “Who sang the soprano and alto parts in Bach’s cantatas?” Translation by Thomas Braatz © 2009 [The following is a translation of pages 43 to 48 from Arnold Schering’s book, Johann Sebastian Bachs Leipziger Kirchenmusik, published in 1936 in Leipzig and presented in facsimile after the translation. To distinguish between Schering’s original footnotes and mine, his are highlighted in red while mine are left in black.] The paragraph leading into this passage describes Georg PhilippTelemann’s (1681- 1767) sacred music activities in the Neukirche (New Church) in Leipzig. These cantata performances were accomplished by Telemann with the help of university students only and without any assistance from the Thomaner1 choir(s) which were under Johann Kuhnau’s (1660-1722 - Bach’s immediate predecessor) direction. Jealous of the success that Telemann was having with his performances, Kuhnau commented that the young people there [Neukirche] had no real idea about what the proper style of singing in a church was all about and that their goal was “directed toward a so- called cantata-like manner of singing”. By this he evidently meant the elegant, modern way that male falsettists2 sang their solos [compared to the soprano and alto voices of young boys before their mutation]. What was Bach’s way of treating this matter in his sacred music? A cantor’s constant concern, as we have seen, is the ability to obtain and train good sopranos and basses. Kuhnau’s experience, that among his young scholars strong bass singers were a rarity,3 was an experience that his cantor predecessors in Leipzig had already had.
    [Show full text]
  • Musical Voices of Early Modern Women 1St Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    MUSICAL VOICES OF EARLY MODERN WOMEN 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Thomasin LaMay | 9781351916288 | | | | | Musical Voices of Early Modern Women 1st edition PDF Book Charles C. The band formed in , with folk musician Mike Settle guitar and backing vocals and the operatically-trained Thelma Camacho lead vocals completing the lineup. Learn how and when to remove these template messages. Most serious collectors want the 'true first edition' - the 'first edition, first printing' - and sometimes detective work is required to identify which edition that is. There are a number of these type of sellers out there. The third single from the album, a version of Merle Haggard 's "Today I Started Loving You Again" reached the lower regions of the country charts in mid Choral Opera Lied Vocables. Monumental tried to give them just this. The Guardian notes that Tolkien inscribed it with a poem in Old English, which roughly translates to:. American country rock group. As with the Ordinary, the earliest settings are in plainchant, and troping also existed in the Propers. The current retail value of your book is probably somewhere in that neighborhood. Slowly growing apart from the others, Camacho began to feel restricted by the band in a number of ways. Today is National Voter Registration Day! Each time a publisher releases a new instance of the same title, or when a book is released in a new format, these may also be considered first edition books. Women are typically divided into three groups: soprano , mezzo-soprano , and contralto. Recorded over six months in , and released in March , The Ballad of Calico was written by future star Michael Murphey and the First Edition's musical director and arranger Larry Cansler.
    [Show full text]
  • Musical Staff: the Skeleton Upon Which Musical Notation Is Hung
    DulcimerCrossing.com General Music Theory Lesson 7 Steve Eulberg Musical Staff [email protected] Musical Staff: The skeleton upon which musical notation is hung. The Musical Staff is comprised of a clef (5 lines and 4 spaces) on which notes or rests are placed. At one time the staff was made up of 11 lines and 10 spaces. It proved very difficult to read many notes quickly and modern brain research has demonstrated that human perception actually does much better at quick recall when it can “chunk” information into groups smaller than 7. Many years ago, the people developing musical notation created a helpful modification by removing the line that designated where “Middle C” goes on the staff and ending up with two clefs that straddle middle C. The treble clef includes C and all the notes above it. The Bass clef includes C and all the notes below it. (See Transitional Musical Staff): DulcimerCrossing.com General Music Theory Lesson 7 Steve Eulberg Musical Staff [email protected] Now the current musical staff has separated the top staff and the bottom staff further apart, but they represent the same pattern of notes as above, now with room for lyrics between the staves. (Staves is the plural form of Staff) DulcimerCrossing.com General Music Theory Lesson 7 Steve Eulberg Musical Staff [email protected] The Staves are distinct from each other by their “Clef Sign.” (See above) This example shows the two most commonly used Clef Signs. Compare the Space and Line names in the Historical example and this one. The information is now “chunked” into less than 7 bits of information (which turns out to be the natural limit in the human brain!) on each staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Erisk at CLEF 2019 Early Risk Prediction on the Internet (Extended Overview)
    Overview of eRisk at CLEF 2019 Early Risk Prediction on the Internet (extended overview) David E. Losada1, Fabio Crestani2, and Javier Parapar3 1 Centro Singular de Investigación en Tecnoloxías da Información (CiTIUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain [email protected] 2 Faculty of Informatics, Universitá della Svizzera italiana (USI), Switzerland [email protected] 3 Information Retrieval Lab, Centro de Investigación en Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones, Universidade da Coruña, Spain [email protected] Abstract. This paper provides an overview of eRisk 2019, the third edition of this lab under the CLEF conference. The main purpose of eRisk is to explore is- sues of evaluation methodology, effectiveness metrics and other processes related to early risk detection. Early detection technologies can be employed in different areas, particularly those related to health and safety. This edition of eRisk had three tasks. Two of them shared the same format and focused on early detecting signs of depression (T1) or self-harm (T2). The third task (T3) focused on an innovative challenge related to automatically filling a depression questionnaire based on user interactions in social media. 1 Introduction The main purpose of eRisk is to explore issues of evaluation methodologies, perfor- mance metrics and other aspects related to building test collections and defining chal- lenges for early risk detection. Early detection technologies are potentially useful in different areas, particularly those related to safety and health. For example, early alerts could be sent when a person starts showing signs of a mental disorder, when a sexual predator starts interacting with a child, or when a potential offender starts publishing antisocial threats on the Internet.
    [Show full text]