Boating- and Shipping-Related Environmental Impacts and Example Management Measures: a Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Boating- and Shipping-Related Environmental Impacts and Example Management Measures: a Review Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Review Boating- and Shipping-Related Environmental Impacts and Example Management Measures: A Review Troy A. Byrnes 1 and Ryan J. K. Dunn 2,* 1 5/66 Surf Parade, Broadbeach, QLD 4218, Australia; [email protected] 2 Ocean Science & Technology, RPS, P.O. Box 5692, Gold Coast MC, QLD 9726, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 21 October 2020; Accepted: 10 November 2020; Published: 12 November 2020 Abstract: Boating and shipping operations, their associated activities and supporting infrastructure present a potential for environmental impacts. Such impacts include physical changes to bottom substrate and habitats from sources such as anchoring and mooring and vessel groundings, alterations to the physico-chemical properties of the water column and aquatic biota through the application of antifouling paints, operational and accidental discharges (ballast and bilge water, hydrocarbons, garbage and sewage), fauna collisions, and various other disturbances. Various measures exist to sustainably manage these impacts. In addition to a review of associated boating- and shipping-related environmental impacts, this paper provides an outline of the government- and industry-related measures relevant to achieving positive outcomes in an Australian context. Historically, direct regulations have been used to cover various environmental impacts associated with commercial, industrial, and recreational boating and shipping operations (e.g., MARPOL). The effectiveness of this approach is the degree to which compliance can be effectively monitored and enforced. To be effective, environmental managers require a comprehensive understanding of the full range of instruments available, and the respective roles they play in helping achieve positive environmental outcomes, including the pros and cons of the various regulatory alternatives. Keywords: anti-fouling treatments; benthic disturbance; coastal environments; environmental management; hydrocarbon pollution; MARPOL; species translocation; sewage discharge; water quality; wildlife impacts 1. Introduction Aquatic biomes covering approximately 75% of the earth’s surface contain critically important natural resources sustaining life and countless life cycles, while providing varying environmental, economic, social, and cultural services [1,2]. Such services are well documented and include the provision and storage of water supplies used for drinking and crop irrigation, power generation, oxygen production, nutrient supply and cycling, hosting important global food and pharmaceutical stocks, and climate regulation [3–5]. Furthermore, the use of water bodies for transporting commodities internationally using shipping fleets is significantly important for global commerce and trade. The provision of such services offered by aquatic biomes are often negatively impacted by continuing anthropogenic pressures [6,7]. Since the earliest times boats have served as transportation and played an important role in commerce and exploration [8]. To this day, boats continue to be an ever-present sighting throughout the world’s waterways used for transportation, leisure, and sporting pursuits. Additionally, ships (distinguished by larger size, shape, and purpose compared with boats) historically, and currently, J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 908; doi:10.3390/jmse8110908 www.mdpi.com/journal/jmse J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 908 2 of 49 play significant roles in ocean exploration, war-time conflicts, trade, fishing operations, migration, border security, infrastructure development and installations, as well as science/research-based efforts. The historical importance on boats and ships in today’s society is reflected in the fact that many large and capital international cities owe their existence to the ease for vessel access as preferred sites of settlement. In fact, 22 of the 32 largest cities in the world are located on estuaries [9] with sheltered navigable waters and large associated infrastructure, including ever-expanding recreational marinas, commercial harbors, and trade ports highlighting the continuing importance to this day. Boats vary in size and construction methods according to their intended purpose, available materials, or local traditions. Examples, include fishing boats which vary widely in style partly to match local conditions, pleasure craft used for recreational boating such as sailboats, ski boats, and pontoon boats, houseboats used for long-term residence or vacationing purposes, lighters and tugs used to transport cargo to and from other vessels and maneuvering assistance, respectively. Such boats are propelled either by manpower (e.g., oars or paddles), wind (e.g., sails), or engines (including fossil fuel and electric) and typically operate on inland waterways such as rivers and lakes, or in coastal waters. Ships, alternatively are larger ocean-going vessels capable of completing intercontinental travels and are designed for specific offshore purposes such as being capable of transferring high tonnages of commodities (e.g., tankers, dry and liquid cargo ships and floating production storage and offloading vessels) or large volumes of people (e.g., liners and cruisers), provide military services, or commercial fishing pursuits. Ship propulsion examples include steam turbines powered by fossil fuels or nuclear reaction, diesel engines, gas turbines, and stirling or steam engines. Through the variety of services offered by boats and ships their worth to humanity and economic prosperity is apparent. Whether it is the provision of foods from small to large-scale fishing pursuits, transportation means for commercial and recreational purposes, leisure and sporting pursuits in more developed nations, and the global distribution of commodities. However, daily operations under normal boating and shipping practices, associated onshore activities (e.g., maintenance slips or ship demolition), or accidental discharges/occurrences (e.g., explosions, groundings, or loss of contents such as oil or merchant containers) all contribute to potential environmental impacts (e.g., [10–14]). Such related impacts affect aquatic biome services, most notably through decreased water quality, introduction of alien species, physical disturbance and/or destruction of habitat, flora and fauna, influencing system structure and function, in addition to atmospheric pollutant inputs [10,11,15–17]. Furthermore, impacts are either direct or indirect occurring over varying spatial and temporal scales, according to factors such as the size and density (e.g., cumulative impacts of clustered vessels), movement and specific activity-based operations of boats and ships, and environmental settings and conditions. For example, boating impacts on inland waters may be substantial since these water bodies are smaller and have more limited water exchange compared to coastal areas. Additionally, operational requirements and associated activities may give rise to particular impacts, which at times can be challenging to detect, measure, and predict. A firm understanding of these impacts in aquatic biomes is significantly important, both on immediate and long-term time scales. Global population growth, increased trade, and forecasted increased use of recreational and tourism-based boating pursuits [11,18] will ensure that these boating- and shipping-related environmental impacts continue to increase without intervention and adoption of new technology (e.g., new antifouling agents, more energy efficient and environmentally friendly engines, environmentally friendly moorings (EFMs), etc.,). Accordingly, efforts are made to reduce these impacts in order to protect and preserve the environmental, economic, and cultural services aquatic biomes provide. The prevalence of boating- and shipping-related environmental impacts is detrimental to receiving environments and must be recognized and effectively managed to minimize the adverse effects, wherever possible, through the use of direct and indirect management tools, strategies and techniques (e.g., legislation, education, industry self-regulation, selective use of alternative technology, restrictions and management guidelines) to ensure the long-term sustainability of these environments. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 908 3 of 49 However, the management and protection from boating- and shipping-related impacts are typically varied and challenging tasks given the complexities and interconnected processes at play within aquatic systems, in addition to impacts operating over varying spatial and temporal scales, varying user groups with competing needs and believed responsibilities, ambitions, economic interests, and potential exploitation of legal disparities, and inefficient coordination within and between different (nations) maritime zones [16,19,20]. Furthermore, given the transient and widespread nature of maritime zones, controlling their environmental impacts from numerous diffuse and mobile sources is much more difficult than managing discharges from smaller numbers of fixed-point sources, which often proves a resource and financially demanding assignment. Where there are large numbers of intermittent pollution sources, the cost of ensuring compliance through publicly funded patrols and enforcement is high, governments may only obtain political support for such an approach where the expected social and environmental benefits are equally significant [16]. Differences in boating-related environmental management measures have been shown to be associated principally with patterns
Recommended publications
  • Milford Haven Waterway Recreation Plan
    2016 Milford Haven Waterway 5 Year Recreation Management Plan 2 Foreword by the Harbourmaster The Port of Milford Haven aims to ensure that the diverse interests of all users are balanced in a way that promotes a safe, efficient and enjoyable environment. Having undergone several new developments in recent years, the Waterway has gained status as one of the largest oil and gas ports in Northern Europe, and whilst we are proud of the Port’s reputation as the UK’s Energy Capital, we are always keen to demonstrate how an increasing number of leisure users happily co- exist with the commercial traffic on the Waterway. Indeed, the majority of the 23 miles for which we are responsible, is devoted entirely to recreational use. The Milford Haven Waterway is famed for its sheltered, tidal waters, its diverse coastline and unique environmental qualities. Part of the only coastal national park in the UK, it is the largest estuary in Wales and recognised as a Special Area of Conservation (SAC). It is also a Waterway that has become a valuable resource for leisure enthusiasts. Focusing on this aspect of the Waterway, this document is the result of a collaborative approach to planning, monitoring and managing the Haven’s recreational opportunities. It offers clear guidance as to how the Port of Milford Haven actively engages with the Waterway’s community stakeholders and partner organisations in the delivery of a sustainable approach to safe and enjoyable water-borne recreation. W.C. Hirst Harbourmaster, Port of Milford Haven 3 4 Contents 1. Introduction 6 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Review of the Trophic Status of the Milford Haven Waterway
    Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the available evidence relating to the trophic status of the Milford Haven waterway and to recommend whether a case for designation as a Polluted Water (Eutrophic) should be made under the terms of the Nitrates Directive. The report reviews available data and compliance with other relevant European directives. The EC Nitrates Directive (91/676/EEC) requires that waters which are eutrophic due to nitrates derived from agricultural sources, or are at risk of becoming so unless preventative action is taken, must be identified as Polluted Waters (Eutrophic) and areas of land draining into these waters, and which contribute to their nitrogen pollution, must be designated as Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NVZs). Opportunistic macroalgae, phytoplankton and nutrient data have been reviewed in this and previous studies undertaken for the Nitrates, Urban Waste Water Treatment and Water Framework (WFD) directives. Milford Haven waterway is at Moderate status and hypernutrified compared to WFD nutrient standards. Phytoplankton blooms do not occur in the waterway, but within the sheltered bays and inlets there is widespread and often dense growth of opportunistic macroalgae species, primarily Ulva sp. Evidence from WFD monitoring in the Milford Haven Inner water body shows that dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) levels are Moderate and this is reflected in the opportunistic macroalgae classification, which also achieves Moderate status. Therefore, this transitional water body is currently failing to meet Good status, which is required for WFD compliance by 2027. The WFD DIN classification demonstrates that the waters of the Milford Haven Outer water body are also at Moderate status and are hyper-nutrified according to WFD standards, but assessments did not demonstrate failures of phytoplankton or opportunistic macroalgae quality elements at water body level.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Milford Haven Stakeholder Perception Survey 2018 Raw Data
    Appendix B - Port of Milford Haven Stakeholder Perception Survey 2018 Raw Data 1. I live in or within 5 miles of … Pembroke Dock 10.23% Neyland 8.14% Pembroke 10.47% Haverfordwest 12.33% Milford Haven 24.88% Dale 3.49% Other (see below) 30.47% 102 miles away Llanfyrnach 20 miles of Milford Haven Llangwm 6 miles outside H ‘west Llangwm Ferry Aberystwyth Llanstadwell Angle London Anglesey Maenclochog Bridgend Manorbier Bristol Narberth Broad Haven New Quay, Ceredigion Cardiff Newgale Carmarthen Newport Carmarthenshire None of the above Clunderwen North Pembrokeshire Crymych north wales DY8 3AQ Nottingham Fishguard Outside Pembrokeshire France Pont Robert Live outside area but with strong Pontllyfni. However, I sail regularly involvement/interest in area from Milford Haven. Haverfordwest Poole, Dorset Hazelbeach Porthcawl Horsham West Sussex Presteigne I am a regular visitor to Dale Saundersfoot I don't live in or within 5miles Scotland I work in the Haven Solva Johnston Soulbury Kilgetty St.Davids Landlord of property in Pembroke Dock Stratford upon Avon Landshipping Swansea Lawrenny Tenby Letterston Trefin Live further Tywyn, Gwynedd Yorkshire Wdig Hampshire Whitland Live out of county, work in We operate an animal feed business Haverfordwest within the port 2. I am a…. (tick all that apply) Local resident 3 7.23% Owner/senior manager of a land-based business 6.68% Owner/senior manager of a water-based business 2.86% Member of an environmental campaign group 0.48% Recreational user of the Milford Haven Waterway 16.23% Journalist 0.24% Local Politician 0.95% Public Sector Employee 7.16% Student 0.48% Suppliers of goods/services to POMH 3.58% Customer of POMH 3.82% Port Employee 1.19% Visitor to the area 4.06% County, town or community Councillor 7.64% Other (see below) 7.40% 3rd sector (env/education) employee/ Manager of a conservation charity local resident organisation Previous Chairman of the Milford Haven Member of local maritime heritage Users Association charity.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Pollution by Stephen Davis − 2/26/08
    1 Prepared for SAB's review of EPA "Report on the Environment (2007)" [minor changes 3/11/08] Light Pollution by Stephen Davis − 2/26/08 One thing the EPA has been pushing is its "Green Lights" program. Using energy efficient light bulbs is not good enough: a) When too much light is being used, b) When aimed improperly, or c) When nobody is there to use it.[1] This is "Light Pollution!" And there is way too much of it costing the USA some $4.5 billion or more annually. This energy and money could be put to far better use. [2,3] Light Pollution and all its ramifications are missing from the EPA "Report on the Environment."[4,5] The #1 and #2 problems in Congress, needing immediate attention, are the economy and climate change. Both are directly related to energy independence and homeland security.[6] There is a connection between Light Pollution and what Congress considers as in our best interests. Unfortunately, government hasn't been watching were the money goes and how it is spent. We need accountability[7,8] and awareness[9] at all levels right down to the common man on the street before it's too late and we are all looking for life boats. What happened to "conservation" − the word that is never to be spoken?[10,] What if the money and other resources aren't there, or could they be put to better use elsewhere? The federal government can lead the way and get others involved through policy, guidance, and monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Light Pollution in a Tourism-Based Economy, with Recommendations for a National Lighting Ordinance
    REDUCING LIGHT POLLUTION IN A TOURISM-BASED ECONOMY, WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A NATIONAL LIGHTING ORDINANCE Prepared by the Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network (WIDECAST) Kimberley N. Lake and Karen L. Eckert __________________________________________________________ WIDECAST Technical Report No. 11 2009 Cover photos: Tree-mounted double spotlights at the Frangipani Beach Resort, with new hotel construction in the background (photo by Kimberley Lake); Leatherback sea turtle hatchling attracted by beachfront lighting and unable to find the sea (photo by Sebastien Barrioz). For bibliographic purposes, this publication should be cited as follows: Lake, Kimberley N. and Karen L. Eckert. 2009. Reducing Light Pollution in a Tourism-Based Economy, with Recommendations for a National Lighting Ordinance. Prepared by the Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network (WIDECAST) for the Department of Fisheries and Marine Resources, Government of Anguilla. WIDECAST Technical Report No. 11. Ballwin, Missouri. 65 pp. ISSN: 1930-3025 Copies of the publication may be obtained from: Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network (WIDECAST) 1348 Rusticview Drive Ballwin, Missouri 63011 Phone: + (314) 954-8571 Email: [email protected] Online at www.widecast.org REDUCING LIGHT POLLUTION IN A TOURISM-BASED ECONOMY, WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A NATIONAL LIGHTING ORDINANCE Kimberley N. Lake Karen L. Eckert 2009 Lake and Eckert (2009) ~ Reducing Light Pollution in a Tourism-Based Economy ~ WIDECAST Technical Report 11 PREFACE AND INTENT For more than two decades, the Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network (WIDECAST, www.widecast.org), with Country Coordinators in more than 40 Caribbean nations and territories, has linked scientists, conservationists, natural resource users and managers, policy-makers, industry groups, educators, and other stakeholders together in a collective effort to develop a unified management framework, and to promote a region-wide capacity to design and implement science-based sea turtle conservation programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Contaminant Surveillance in Milford Haven Waterway
    Sediment contaminant surveillance in Milford Haven Waterway D. I. Little, B. Bullimore, Y. Galperin and W. J. Langston D. I. Little, Environmental Consultancy, Swavesey, Cambridge CB24 4RL, UK; e-mail: [email protected] B. Bullimore, Deep Green Seas, Marine Environmental Consultancy, Tiers Cross, Haverfordwest SA62 3DG, UK Y. Galperin, Environmental Geochemistry Consulting, Moorpark, California 93021, USA W. J. Langston, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB, UK Abstract Sediment contaminants were monitored in Milford Haven Waterway (MHW) since 1978 (hydrocarbons) and 1982 (metals), with the aim of providing surveillance of environmental quality in one of the UK’s busiest oil and gas ports. This aim is particularly important during and after large-scale investment in liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities. However, methods inevitably have changed over the years, compounding the difficulties of coordinating sampling and analytical programmes. After a review by the MHW Environmental Surveillance Group (MHWESG), sediment hydrocarbon chemistry was investigated in detail in 2010. Natural Resources Wales (NRW) contributed their MHW data for 2007 and 2012, collected to assess the condition of the Special Area of Conservation (SAC) designated under the European Union Habitats Directive. Datasets during 2007-2012 have thus been more comparable. The results showed conclusively that a MHW-wide peak in concentrations of sediment polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), metals and other contaminants occurred in late 2007. This was corroborated by independent annual monitoring at one centrally-located station with peaks in early 2008 and 2011. The spatial and temporal patterns of recovery from the 2007 peak, shown by MHW- wide surveys in 2010 and 2012, indicate several probable causes of contaminant trends, as follows: atmospheric deposition, catchment runoff, sediment resuspension from dredging, and construction of two LNG terminals and a power station.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Metals Contents and Risk Assessment of Farmland on the Edge of Sichuan Basin
    ISSN: 2572-4061 Yang et al. J Toxicol Risk Assess 2019, 5:018 DOI: 10.23937/2572-4061.1510018 Volume 5 | Issue 1 Journal of Open Access Toxicology and Risk Assessment RESEARCH ARTICLE Heavy metals contents and risk assessment of farmland on the edge of Sichuan Basin Mengling Yang2,3, Dan Zhang2*, Lu Xu2,4, Shamshad Khan2, Fan Chen1 and Hao Jiang2 1Tobacco Company of Liangshan, China 2Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Check for updates 3Bossco Environmental Protection Group, China 4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China *Corresponding author: Dan Zhang, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 9, Section 4, Renmin South Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China Sichuan is a major agricultural province in China, Abstract with second large arable flied area in China. Agricultural This study features a survey of the concentrations of heavy metals (Cu, Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb, Mn, Co, Se) in surface soils products quality is closely related to the purity of soil. (0-30 cm), carried out in edge of Sichuan Basin (Pingdi, It’s necessary to measure and evaluate the soil heavy Puan, Xingwen, Gulin). The contamination of heavy metals metals pollution in order to guarantee the sustainability in soil was assessed with single-factor pollution index of agricultural products’ quality and safety. Since the method and Nemerow comprehensive pollution index 1980s, researchers have began to focus on the heavy method. The results showed that Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb, Co were main risk factors of soil heavy metal pollution. In Gulin, the metals pollution in Chendu Plain, but few report on the concentrations of Cd, Mn and Se were higher than other risk assessment of farmland heavy metals contents on three areas, with the sample over-standard rate of 90, the edge of Sichuan [9-12].
    [Show full text]
  • Pliocene to Quaternary Sinistral Neptunea Species (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Buccinidae) from the NE Atlantic
    Cainozoic Research, 14(1), pp. 17-34, July 2014 17 Pliocene to Quaternary sinistral Neptunea species (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Buccinidae) from the NE Atlantic Marcel Vervoenen1, Freddy van Nieulande2, Koen Fraussen3, Frank P. Wesselingh4, 6 & Ronald Pouwer5 1 Beekstraat 86A, B-9300 Aalst, Belgium 2 Scheldepoortstraat 56, NL-4339 BN Nieuw- en Sint Joosland, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 Leuvensestraat 25, B-3200 Aarschot, Belgium; [email protected] 4 Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands; [email protected] 5 Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands; [email protected] 6 corresponding author. Received 29 April 2014, revised version accepted 23 May 2014 The taxonomy of sinistral Neptunea species from the Pliocene of the North Sea Basin and the Quaternary of NW Europe is investigated. All sinistral forms are considered to be part of a single clade. Morphological varieties from the Pliocene successions of the southern North Sea Basin are documented. A remarkable increase in the number of varieties occurs in a short stratigraphic interval in the latest Piacenzian (Lillo Formation, Kruisschans Member, Antwerp area, Belgium). The Pliocene morphs are for the moment grouped as forms within Neptunea angulata Harmer, 1914 (non N. angulata Wood, 1848). Several of the morphs appear to lack intermediate forms and thus the presence of sibling species may be demonstrated when more material will become available. During the Pleistocene, the sinistral species N. inversa Harmer, 1918, occurred in NW Europe. South of the North Sea Basin the last occurrence of the species is at least the Middle Pleistocene MIS 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Safety Code Chapter 425. Regulation of Certain Outdoor Lighting
    HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE TITLE 5. SANITATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY SUBTITLE F. LIGHT POLLUTION CHAPTER 425. REGULATION OF CERTAIN OUTDOOR LIGHTING Sec.A425.001.AADEFINITIONS. In this chapter: (1)AA"Cutoff luminaire" means a luminaire in which 2.5% or less of the lamp lumens are emitted above a horizontal plane through the luminaire 's lowest part and 10% or less of the lamp lumens are emitted at a vertical angle 80 degrees above the luminaire 's lowest point. (2)AA"Light pollution" means the night sky glow caused by the scattering of artificial light in the atmosphere. (3)AA"Outdoor lighting fixture" means any type of fixed or movable lighting equipment that is designed or used for illumination outdoors. The term includes billboard lighting, street lights, searchlights and other lighting used for advertising purposes, and area lighting. The term does not include lighting equipment that is required by law to be installed on motor vehicles or lighting required for the safe operation of aircraft. (4)AA"State funds" means: (A)AAmoney appropriated by the legislature; or (B)AAbond revenues of the state. Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 713, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999. Renumbered from Sec. 421.001 by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1420, Sec. 21.001(76), eff. Sept. 1, 2001. Sec.A425.002.AASTANDARDS FOR STATE-FUNDED OUTDOOR LIGHTING FIXTURES. (a) An outdoor lighting fixture may be installed, replaced, maintained, or operated using state funds only if: (1)AAthe new or replacement outdoor lighting fixture is a cutoff luminaire if the rated output
    [Show full text]
  • Students' Opinions on the Light Pollution Application
    International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2015, 8(1), 55-68 Students’ Opinions on the Light Pollution Application Cengiz ÖZYÜREK Ordu University, Turkey Güliz AYDIN Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Turkey Received: June, 2015 / Revised: August, 2015 / Accepted: August, 2015 Abstract The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of computer-animated concept cartoons and outdoor science activities on creating awareness among seventh graders about light pollution. It also aims to identify the views of the students on the activities that were carried out. This study used one group pre-test/post-test experimental design model with 30 seventh graders. The data in the study were collected via open-ended questions on light pollution and semi-structured interview questions. The open-ended questions on light pollution were administered as a pre-test and a post- test. After the post-test was administered, semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven students. The data collected from the open-ended questions and semi-structured interviews were qualitatively analysed and quotes from the students’ statements were included. Looking at the answers of the students to questions on light pollution, it was understood that the activities that were carried out were effective. Furthermore, all of the students that were interviewed made positive statements about the activities that were carried out. Keywords: Light pollution, Concept cartoons, Students’ views. Introduction Humans are an indispensable part of the environment that they live in. Due to the rapid increase in population, overurbanization, industrialization and, consequently, the excessive use of natural resources, today, environmental issues have become global issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioaccumulation in Milford Haven Waterway
    Bioaccumulation in Milford Haven Waterway W J Langstona*, N D Popea , S O’Haraa, M Imamuraa, H Harinob, Kim, A.Wc. and c C H Vane aMarine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB bSchool of Human Sciences, Kobe College, 4-1 Okadayama, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 662-8505, Japan cBritish Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, NG12 5GG Keywords: Milford Haven, bioaccumulation, metals, PAHs, PCBs, organotins Abstract: Biomonitoring of contaminants (metals, organotins, PAHs, PCBs) was carried out along the Milford Haven Waterway (MHW) and at a reference site in the Tywi Estuary during 2007-2008. The species used as bioindicators encompass a variety of uptake routes - Fucus vesiculosus (dissolved contaminants); Littorina littorea (grazer); Mytilus edulis and Cerastoderma edule (suspension feeders); and Nereis diversicolor (omnivore which often reflects contaminants in sediment). Differences in feeding strategy and habitat preference have subtle implications for bioaccumulation trends though, with few exceptions, contaminant body burdens in Milford Haven (MH) were higher than those at the Tywi reference site, reflecting inputs. Elevated concentrations of metals were occasionally observed at individual MH sites, whilst As and Se (molluscs and seaweed) were, for much of MHW, consistently at the higher end of the UK range. However, for the majority of metals, distributions in MH biota were not exceptional by UK standards. Several metal-species combinations indicated increases in bioavailability at upstream sites, which may reflect the influence of geogenic or other land-based sources – perhaps enhanced by lower salinity (greater proportions of more bioavailable forms). TBT levels in MH mussels were below OSPAR toxicity thresholds and in the Tywi were close to zero.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Report 2008 - 2009
    BUSINESS REPORT 2008 - 2009 MILFORD HAVEN WATERWAY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEILLANCE GROUP BUSINESS REPORT 2008 - 2009 ! Copyright Milford Haven Waterway Environmental Surveillance Group 2010 Use of this document to inform environmental decision making in the Milford Haven waterway is welcomed by the MHWESG; however all use should be appropriately acknowledged and referenced. Recommended citation: Milford Haven Waterway Environmental Surveillance Group, 2010. Milford Haven Waterway Environmental Surveillance Group Business Report 2008 – 2009. v&18pp + appendices Milford Haven Waterway Environmental Surveillance Group Report 2008 - 2009 Milford Haven Waterway Environmental Surveillance Group Report 2008 - 2009 Distribution Members Libraries Chevron Ltd National Assembly for Wales Library Countryside Council for Wales Welsh Assembly Government Library Environment Agency Wales National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth Dwr Cymru-Welsh Water Pembrokeshire County Council Public Libraries: Milford Haven Port Authority Fishguard Haverfordwest Murco Petroleum Ltd Milford Haven Pembrokeshire Coast National Park Authority Pembroke Dock Pembrokeshire County Council Tenby RWE Npower plc Sem Logistics Milford Haven Ltd Elected representatives Carmarthen West & South Pembrokeshire MP (Nic Corresponding & observing members Ainger) South Wales Sea Fisheries Committee Preseli Pembrokeshire MP (Stephen Crabb) Wildlife Trust South & West Wales Carmarthen West & South Pembrokeshire AM WAG Environment Division (Angela Burns) Preseli Pembrokeshire AM (Paul Davies) Potential
    [Show full text]