DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Birdwing Butterflies from Indonesia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Birdwing Butterflies from Indonesia UNEP-WCMC technical report Review of Birdwing Butterflies from Indonesia (Version edited for public release) Review of Birdwing butterflies from Indonesia Prepared for The European Commission, Directorate General Environment, Directorate E - Global & Regional Challenges, LIFE ENV.E.2. – Global Sustainability, Trade & Multilateral Agreements, Brussels, Belgium Published November 2014 Copyright European Commission 2014 Citation UNEP-WCMC. 2014. Review of Birdwing Butterflies from Indonesia. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP -WCMC) is the specialist biodiversity assessment of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organization. The Centre has been in operation for over 30 years, combini ng scientific research with policy advice and the development of decision tools. We are able to provide objective, scientifically rigorous products and services to help decision -makers recognize the value of biodiversity and apply this knowledge to all tha t they do. To do this, we collate and verify data on biodiversity and ecosystem services that we analyze and interpret in comprehensive assessments, making the results available in appropriate forms for national and international level decision-makers and businesses. To ensure that our work is both sustainable and equitable we seek to build the capacity of partners where needed, so that they can provide the same services at national and regional scales. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflec t the views or policies of UNEP, contributory organisations or editors. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP, the European Commission or contributory organisations, edito rs or publishers concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of a commercial entity or product in this publication does not imply endorsemen t by UNEP. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK Tel: +44 1223 277314 www.unep-wcmc.org UNEP promotes environmentally sound practices globally and in its own activities. Printing on i paper from environmentally su stainable forests and recyclycled fibre is encouraged. Contents Introduction and summary ............................................................................................................................... 3 Ornithoptera meridionalis II/B ........................................................................................................................ 4 Ornithoptera tithonus II/B ............................................................................................................................... 6 Troides amphrysus II/B ..................................................................................................................................... 9 ii Ornithoptera meridionalis Introduction and summary This review has been prepared to support the Scientific Review Group in assessing trade in ranched specimens of three Birdwing butterflies from Indonesia: Ornithoptera meridionalis, O. tithonus and Troides amphrysus . To aid the SRG in updating its opinions, UNEP-WCMC presented an overview of EU decisions and recent trade in Birdwing butterflies to the EU (2003-2012) from Indonesia at SRG 69. On the basis of this report, the SRG replaced a number of positive opinions for wild specimens of Birdwing butterflies with no opinion i), on account of no significant trade anticipated. The SRG also decided that current positive opinions for ranched specimens of the three species covered by this report may require reassessment. Overview of butterfly ranching: Butterfly ranching has been defined as a method “whereby unenclosed habitat patches are enriched with larval food-plants and adult nectar sources and thereby rendered superattractive, and from where specimens may be harvested by rearing from collected early stages” (New, 1994). It involves artificial manipulation of the natural density of caterpillar host-plants (typically Aristolochia and Adenia vines) within gardens or secondary growth forest to attract egg-laying females. Pupa can then be collected and placed in a cage, hatching box, glass house, or shade house, then when it hatches, the butterfly is killed (by injection of boiling water or ethyl acetate), dried in the sun and sold (Hutton, 1985; Ruskin, 1985; Parsons, 1995; Weintraub, 1995; Small, 2004). Butterflies may be reared for commercial purposes through ranching (source ‘R’) or captive-breeding (source ‘C’). In accordance with Resolution Conf. 11.16 (Rev. CoP15), ranching involves the rearing of high mortality life-stages taken from the wild to adulthood in a controlled environment. Captive breeding is more appropriate to cases where all stages of development are enclosed in a controlled environment. Ranched or captive-bred butterflies are, unlike wild-caught ones, undamaged and therefore of higher quality (Parsons, 1995). Butterfly ranching as described above is thought to minimise the impact on wild stocks of butterflies, as a proportion of the pupa (ideally, about 50 per cent) is left on the vine to repopulate the “farm”. However, it is difficult for a farmer to know how many pupae are present on the vines and thus how many should be collected (Ruskin, 1985; Hutton, 1985; Parsons, 1995; Small, 2004). Nevertheless, butterfly ranching has been widely considered to be a successful conservation tool, both for the butterflies and for their habitats (Hutton, 1985; New and Collins, 1991; Parsons, 1995; New, 1994; Weintraub, 1995; Orsak, 1993). People can participate easily in butterfly ranching because of the low capital needed, which in turn can also help to reduce destruction of primary habitat by lessening economic dependence on shifting agriculture as a result of cash being available from sales of the insects (New, 1994). Butterfly ranching can, therefore, play a vital role locally in preventing the destruction of tropical forest (Parsons, 1995). 3 Ornithoptera meridionalis INSECTA: PAPILIONIDAE Ornithoptera meridionalis II/B COMMON NAMES: Southern Tailed Birdwing (English); Ornithoptère méridional (French) RANGE STATES: Indonesia, Papua New Guinea UNDER REVIEW: Indonesia EU DECISIONS: Current positive opinion for ranched specimens from Indonesia formed on 11/02/1998, and no opinion for wild specimens formed on 15/05/2002. A no opinion (ii) was formed for ranched specimens from Papua New Guinea on 27/02/2014. IUCN: Endangered (needs updating) Taxonomic Note According to D'Abrera (2003), Ornithoptera meridionalis was previously considered to be a subspecies of O. paradisea , which it resembles. Ohya (2001, cited in Matsuka, 2001 [the CITES standard nomenclature reference for birdwing butterflies]) listed two subspecies: O. m. meridionalis and O. m. tarunggarensis. Trade patterns Direct trade in Ornithoptera meridionalis from Indonesia to the EU-28 2003-2012 mainly comprised ranched bodies for commercial purposes (700 bodies as reported imported by EU Member States) (Table 1). The principal importers were Austria and Germany. Direct trade to the rest of the world 2003-2012 mainly comprised ranched bodies, predominantly imported by Japan, the United States and Canada. Indirect trade in O. meridionalis to the EU-28 originating in Indonesia 2003-2012 consisted of small numbers of ranched bodies (56 and 24, as reported by exporters and importers respectively), all for commercial purposes; Malaysia was the main re-exporter. There were no exports of wild-sourced specimens from Indonesia 2003-2012. Indonesia has not published export quotas for ranched or captive-bred specimens of this species. Table 1: Direct exports of Ornithoptera meridionalis bodies from Indonesia to the EU-28 (EU) and the rest of the world (RoW), 2003-2012. Importer Purpose Source Reported by 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total EU P R Importer 6 6 10 8 6 36 Exporter T C Importer 24 24 Exporter 6 6 R Importer 36 28 48 92 38 373 26 32 27 700 Exporter 80 72 68 104 100 38 96 114 115 787 RoW E R Importer 4 4 Exporter T C Importer 2 10 12 Exporter 4 4 R Importer 108 402 288 200 200 70 50 144 66 44 1572 Exporter 314 268 444 236 230 236 159 424 595 324 3230 Source: CITES Trade Database, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK, downloaded on 22/09/2014. 4 Ornithoptera meridionalis Conservation status Ornithoptera meridionalis was reported to occur in Indonesia and Papua New Guinea on the island of New Guinea (Laithwaite et al. , 1975; Collins and Morris, 1985). Collins and Morris (1985) considered typical habitats to include primary and secondary lowland rainforests, usually at altitudes of 20-200 m. The species was reported to carry five to seven large eggs, which was considered to be a relatively low number compared to other birdwings (D’Abrera, 1975; Collins and Morris, 1985). Collins and Morris (1985) reported that the giant birdwings of New Guinea, Indonesia and the Solomon Islands generally lay no more than thirty eggs per generation. D’Abrera (2003) reported that the two subspecies occured at opposite ends of mainland New Guinea, with O. m. tarunggarensis occuring in the north of Western Irian Jaya (Papua), from Kamrau Bay to Timika and north to the Kobowre (Weyland) Mountains. Collins and Morris (1985) noted its occurrence in the area around Lake Yamur (Jamur) in the east of the Weyland Mountains. Whilst D'Abrera (2003)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 9 2013, No.1136
    2013, No.1136 8 LAMPIRAN I PERATURAN MENTERI PERDAGANGAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 50/M-DAG/PER/9/2013 TENTANG KETENTUAN EKSPOR TUMBUHAN ALAM DAN SATWA LIAR YANG TIDAK DILINDUNGI UNDANG-UNDANG DAN TERMASUK DALAM DAFTAR CITES JENIS TUMBUHAN ALAM DAN SATWA LIAR YANG TIDAK DILINDUNGI UNDANG-UNDANG DAN TERMASUK DALAM DAFTAR CITES No. Pos Tarif/HS Uraian Barang Appendix I. Binatang Hidup Lainnya. - Binatang Menyusui (Mamalia) ex. 0106.11.00.00 Primata dari jenis : - Macaca fascicularis - Macaca nemestrina ex. 0106.19.00.00 Binatang menyusui lain-lain dari jenis: - Pteropus alecto - Pteropus vampyrus ex. 0106.20.00.00 Binatang melata (termasuk ular dan penyu) dari jenis: · Ular (Snakes) - Apodora papuana / Liasis olivaceus papuanus - Candoia aspera - Candoia carinata - Leiopython albertisi - Liasis fuscus - Liasis macklotti macklotti - Morelia amethistina - Morelia boeleni - Morelia spilota variegata - Naja sputatrix - Ophiophagus hannah - Ptyas mucosus - Python curtus - Python brongersmai - Python breitensteini - Python reticulates www.djpp.kemenkumham.go.id 9 2013, No.1136 No. Pos Tarif/HS Uraian Barang · Biawak (Monitors) - Varanus beccari - Varanus doreanus - Varanus dumerili - Varanus jobiensis - Varanus rudicollis - Varanus salvadori - Varanus salvator · Kura-Kura (Turtles) - Amyda cartilaginea - Calllagur borneoensis - Carettochelys insculpta - Chelodina mccordi - Cuora amboinensis - Heosemys spinosa - Indotestudo forsteni - Leucocephalon (Geoemyda) yuwonoi - Malayemys subtrijuga - Manouria emys - Notochelys platynota - Pelochelys bibroni
    [Show full text]
  • English Cop18 Prop. XXX CONVENTION ON
    Original language: English CoP18 Prop. XXX CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Eighteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Colombo (Sri Lanka), 23 May – 3 June 2019 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal: To include the species Parides burchellanus in Appendix I, in accordance with Article II, paragraph 1 of the Convention and satisfying Criteria A i,ii, v; B i,iii, iv and C ii of Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP17). B. Proponent Brazil C. Supporting statement: 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Insecta 1.2 Order: Lepidoptera 1.3 Family: Papilionidae 1.4 Species: Parides burchellanus (Westwood, 1872) 1.5 Synonymies: Papilio jaguarae Foetterle, 1902; Papilio numa Boisduval, 1836; Parides socama Schaus, 1902. 1.6 Common names: English: Swallowtail Portuguese:Borboleta-ribeirinha 2. Overview 1 The present proposal is based on the current knowledge about the species Parides burchellanus, well presented in Volume 7 of the Red Book of the Brazilian Fauna Threatened with Extinction1 and in present data on the supply of specimens for sale in the international market. The species has a restricted distribution2 with populations in the condition of decline as a consequence of anthropic actions in their habitat. It is categorized in Brazil as Critically Endangered (CR), according to criterion C2a(i) of the International Union for Conservation of Nature – IUCN. This criterion implies small and declining populations. In addition, these populations are also hundreds of kilometers apart from each other. The present proposal therefore seeks to reduce the pressure exerted by illegal trade on this species through its inclusion in Annex I to the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Russel Wallace and the Darwinian Species Concept
    Gayana 73(2): Suplemento, 2009 ISSN 0717-652X ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE AND THE Darwinian SPECIES CONCEPT: HIS paper ON THE swallowtail BUTTERFLIES (PAPILIONIDAE) OF 1865 ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE Y EL concepto darwiniano DE ESPECIE: SU TRABAJO DE 1865 SOBRE MARIPOSAS papilio (PAPILIONIDAE) Jam ES MA LLET 1 Galton Laboratory, Department of Biology, University College London, 4 Stephenson Way, London UK, NW1 2HE E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Soon after his return from the Malay Archipelago, Alfred Russel Wallace published one of his most significant papers. The paper used butterflies of the family Papilionidae as a model system for testing evolutionary hypotheses, and included a revision of the Papilionidae of the region, as well as the description of some 20 new species. Wallace argued that the Papilionidae were the most advanced butterflies, against some of his colleagues such as Bates and Trimen who had claimed that the Nymphalidae were more advanced because of their possession of vestigial forelegs. In a very important section, Wallace laid out what is perhaps the clearest Darwinist definition of the differences between species, geographic subspecies, and local ‘varieties.’ He also discussed the relationship of these taxonomic categories to what is now termed ‘reproductive isolation.’ While accepting reproductive isolation as a cause of species, he rejected it as a definition. Instead, species were recognized as forms that overlap spatially and lack intermediates. However, this morphological distinctness argument breaks down for discrete polymorphisms, and Wallace clearly emphasised the conspecificity of non-mimetic males and female Batesian mimetic morphs in Papilio polytes, and also in P.
    [Show full text]
  • Sericornis, Acanthizidae)
    GENETIC AND MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION AND PHYLOGENY IN THE AUSTRALO-PAPUAN SCRUBWRENS (SERICORNIS, ACANTHIZIDAE) LESLIE CHRISTIDIS,1'2 RICHARD $CHODDE,l AND PETER R. BAVERSTOCK 3 •Divisionof Wildlifeand Ecology, CSIRO, P.O. Box84, Lyneham,Australian Capital Territory 2605, Australia, 2Departmentof EvolutionaryBiology, Research School of BiologicalSciences, AustralianNational University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia, and 3EvolutionaryBiology Unit, SouthAustralian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia ASS•CRACr.--Theinterrelationships of 13 of the 14 speciescurrently recognized in the Australo-Papuan oscinine scrubwrens, Sericornis,were assessedby protein electrophoresis, screening44 presumptivelo.ci. Consensus among analysesindicated that Sericorniscomprises two primary lineagesof hithertounassociated species: S. beccarii with S.magnirostris, S.nouhuysi and the S. perspicillatusgroup; and S. papuensisand S. keriwith S. spiloderaand the S. frontalis group. Both lineages are shared by Australia and New Guinea. Patternsof latitudinal and altitudinal allopatry and sequencesof introgressiveintergradation are concordantwith these groupings,but many featuresof external morphologyare not. Apparent homologiesin face, wing and tail markings, used formerly as the principal criteria for grouping species,are particularly at variance and are interpreted either as coinherited ancestraltraits or homo- plasies. Distribution patternssuggest that both primary lineageswere first split vicariantly between
    [Show full text]
  • June 2019 Number 191
    June 2019 Number 191 In this issue... June Excursion..................................1 9 June - World Swallowtail Day.............................................................2 Orchard Swallowtail.............2 Ulysses Swallowtail.................3 Cairns Birdwing........................3 Amorphophallus - Camouflagued or just pretty? .......................................................................4 In flower this month......................5 What's Happening.........................6 The rare Megahertzia amplexicaulis in cultivation at Bayview Heights. Photo by Anthony Lagois via Facebook. Cairns Branch.............................6 Townsville Branch....................6 Tablelands Branch...................6 June Excursion June's excursion will take us to the private garden of Anthony Lagois and Brian Moran. Situated on the Cairns hillslopes in Bayview Heights, the garden contains a unique and expanding collection of native rainforest plants. Many things grown here are rarely seen in cultivation. This month's excursion will commence a little earlier than usual - 10 a.m. See the last page for directions and parking instructions. Page 1 SGAP Cairns Branch - Newsletter 191 9 June - World Swallowtail Day The British "Swallowtail and Birdwing Butterfly Trust" have declared 9 June 2019 to be the World Swallowtail Day. This British conservation initiative provides an opportunity to discuss some of our native swallowtail butterflies, and the native plants they eat. Britain's swallowtail butterfly, Papilio machaon is the island nation's
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK November 2000 Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 ISSUES TO CONSIDER....................................................................................................................................1 3.0 WHAT IS BIODIVERSITY?..............................................................................................................................2 4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................3 5.0 CURRENT WORLD HERITAGE SITES............................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Species/Country Combinations Selected for Review by the Animals Committee Following Cop16 CITES Project No
    AC29 Doc. 13.2 Annex 1 UNEP-WCMC technical report Report on species/country combinations selected for review by the Animals Committee following CoP16 CITES Project No. A-498 AC29 Doc. 13.2 Annex 1 Report on species/country combinations selected for review by the Animals Committee following CoP16 Prepared for CITES Secretariat Published May 2017 Citation UNEP-WCMC. 2017. Report on species/country combinations selected for review by the Animals Committee following CoP16. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the many experts who provided valuable data and opinions in the compilation of this report. Copyright CITES Secretariat, 2017 The UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) is the specialist biodiversity assessment centre of UN Environment, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. The Centre has been in operation for over 30 years, combining scientific research with practical policy advice. This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission, provided acknowledgement to the source is made. Reuse of any figures is subject to permission from the original rights holders. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose without permission in writing from UN Environment. Applications for permission, with a statement of purpose and extent of reproduction, should be sent to the Director, UNEP-WCMC, 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0DL, UK. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UN Environment, contributory organisations or editors. The designations employed and the presentations of material in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UN Environment or contributory organisations, editors or publishers concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries or the designation of its name, frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 2002 Band/Volume: 25 Autor(en)/Author(s): Garcia-Barros Enrique Artikel/Article: Taxonomic patterns in the egg to body size allometry of butterflies and skippers (Papilionoidea & Hesperiidae) 161-175 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 25 (2/3): 161-175 161 Taxonomic patterns in the egg to body size allometry of butter- flies and skippers (Papilionoidea & Hesperiidae) Enrique Garcia-Barros Departmento de Biologia (Zool.), Universidad Autönoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain e-mail: [email protected] Summary. Former studies have shown that there is an interspecific allometric relationship between egg size and adult body size in butterflies and skippers. This is here re-assessed at the family and subfamily levels in order to determine to what extent the overall trend is uniform through different taxonomic lineages. The results suggest that different subtaxa are characterised by different allometric slopes. Al- though statistical analysis across species means is known to be potentially misleading to assess evolu- tionary relations, it is shown that the comparison of apparent patterns (based on species means) with inferred evolutionary trends (based on independent contrasts) may help to understand the evolution of egg size in butterflies. Further, intuitive reconsideration of statistically non-significant results may prove informative. As an example, argumentation in favour of a positive association between large egg size and the use of monocotyledon plants as larval food is presented. Taxa where atypical allometric trends are found include the Riodininae and Theclini (Lycaenidae), the Graphiini (Papilionidae), and the Heliconiinae (Nymphalidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) in a Coastal Plain Area in the State of Paraná, Brazil
    62 TROP. LEPID. RES., 26(2): 62-67, 2016 LEVISKI ET AL.: Butterflies in Paraná Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) in a coastal plain area in the state of Paraná, Brazil Gabriela Lourenço Leviski¹*, Luziany Queiroz-Santos¹, Ricardo Russo Siewert¹, Lucy Mila Garcia Salik¹, Mirna Martins Casagrande¹ and Olaf Hermann Hendrik Mielke¹ ¹ Laboratório de Estudos de Lepidoptera Neotropical, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19.020, 81.531-980, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]٭ Abstract: The coastal plain environments of southern Brazil are neglected and poorly represented in Conservation Units. In view of the importance of sampling these areas, the present study conducted the first butterfly inventory of a coastal area in the state of Paraná. Samples were taken in the Floresta Estadual do Palmito, from February 2014 through January 2015, using insect nets and traps for fruit-feeding butterfly species. A total of 200 species were recorded, in the families Hesperiidae (77), Nymphalidae (73), Riodinidae (20), Lycaenidae (19), Pieridae (7) and Papilionidae (4). Particularly notable records included the rare and vulnerable Pseudotinea hemis (Schaus, 1927), representing the lowest elevation record for this species, and Temenis huebneri korallion Fruhstorfer, 1912, a new record for Paraná. These results reinforce the need to direct sampling efforts to poorly inventoried areas, to increase knowledge of the distribution and occurrence patterns of butterflies in Brazil. Key words: Atlantic Forest, Biodiversity, conservation, inventory, species richness. INTRODUCTION the importance of inventories to knowledge of the fauna and its conservation, the present study inventoried the species of Faunal inventories are important for providing knowledge butterflies of the Floresta Estadual do Palmito.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2. Animals
    AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing New Guinea New
    Governing New Guinea New Guinea Governing An oral history of Papuan administrators, 1950-1990 Governing For the first time, indigenous Papuan administrators share their experiences in governing their country with an inter- national public. They were the brokers of development. After graduating from the School for Indigenous Administrators New Guinea (OSIBA) they served in the Dutch administration until 1962. The period 1962-1969 stands out as turbulent and dangerous, Leontine Visser (Ed) and has in many cases curbed professional careers. The politi- cal and administrative transformations under the Indonesian governance of Irian Jaya/Papua are then recounted, as they remained in active service until retirement in the early 1990s. The book brings together 17 oral histories of the everyday life of Papuan civil servants, including their relationship with superiors and colleagues, the murder of a Dutch administrator, how they translated ‘development’ to the Papuan people, the organisation of the first democratic institutions, and the actual political and economic conditions leading up to the so-called Act of Free Choice. Finally, they share their experiences in the UNTEA and Indonesian government organisation. Leontine Visser is Professor of Development Anthropology at Wageningen University. Her research focuses on governance and natural resources management in eastern Indonesia. Leontine Visser (Ed.) ISBN 978-90-6718-393-2 9 789067 183932 GOVERNING NEW GUINEA KONINKLIJK INSTITUUT VOOR TAAL-, LAND- EN VOLKENKUNDE GOVERNING NEW GUINEA An oral history of Papuan administrators, 1950-1990 EDITED BY LEONTINE VISSER KITLV Press Leiden 2012 Published by: KITLV Press Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies) P.O.
    [Show full text]