Tuesday, July 14, 2020 at 3:45 P.M

July 14, 2020

MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL

Type: Committee of the Whole Session Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 at 3:45 P.M. Place: 1St Floor Council Conference Room

Martha Lopez District 1 Council Member - Present

Albert A. Tarantino Jr District 2 Council Member - Present

Yadira Ramos Herbert District 3 Council Member - Present

Ivar Hyden District 4 Council Member - Present

Sara R. Kaye District 5 Council Member - Present

Elizabeth M. Fried District 6 Council Member - Present

Noam Bramson Mayor - Present

The meeting was called to order at 3:46 PM by Mayor Noam Bramson

PRESENTATION 3:45 P.M. - 4:00 P. M.: Performance Update and Upcoming Renewal Re: Westchester Power Program

Dan Welsh, Program Director, Westchester Power, Sustainable Westchester, provided an overview and update of the program which included benefits and goals.

AGENDA REVIEW

COMMENDATION(S):

PUBLIC HEARING(S) THIS EVENING

INSTRUCTIONS - REGISTER TO SPEAK AT PUBLIC HEARINGS OR CITIZENS TO BE HEARD PORTIONS OF MEETING 1. PETITION RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE 81, SECTION 3, (2002) Proposed Ordinance Amending Ordinance 81 of the City of New Rochelle For Iona College Petition – Dormitory Occupancy Limits Public Hearing this evening. RESULT: HELD [UNANIMOUS]

Next: 9/15/2020 3:45 PM AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT:

2. 2020-78 - PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 312-62 PART E RE: PARKING PERMIT REFUND REQUIREMENTS - Ordinance amending Section 312-62, Parking Lots, of Chapter 312, Vehicles and Traffic, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle. Luiz C. Aragon, Commissioner of Development, explained the proposed amendment to the parking permit rules and regulations which will result in improved management of permit availability in municipal lots. July 14, 2020

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson 3. PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE: HERITAGE HOMES PLAYGROUND - Resolution declaring Lead Agency status relative to the Heritage Homes Playground project. RESULT: MOVED TO CONSENT AGENDA [UNANIMOUS]

Next: 7/21/2020 6:15 PM AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson 4. PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE: QUAKER RIDGE ROAD COMPLETE STREETS - Resolution declaring Lead Agency relative to the Quaker Ridge Road Complete Streets Design program. RESULT: MOVED TO CONSENT AGENDA [UNANIMOUS]

Next: 7/21/2020 6:15 PM AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson 5. 2020-79 - PROPOSED LEAD AGENCY STATUS RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ZONING CODE, SECTION 331-115.1, R1-WF-10 DISTRICT - Resolution declaring Lead Agency status relative to the proposed Ordinance amending Section 331-115.1, Special Permit Uses in the R1-WF-10 District, of Chapter 331, Zoning, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle, and related map amendments. Public Hearing relative to proposed amendment to Chapter 331, Zoning Code, is scheduled for Tuesday, September 15, 2020, at 7:00 P. M. RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson 6. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331-115.1, ZONING CODE, RE: SPECIAL PERMIT IN R1-WF-10 DISTRICT- Proposed Ordinance amending Chapter 331, Zoning Code of the City of New Rochelle, Section 115.1, Special Permit Uses in the R1-WF-10 District (Intro. 7/14/20; Public Hearing 9/15/20) Public Hearing relative to proposed amendment to Chapter 331, Zoning Code, is scheduled for Tuesday, September 15, 2020, at 7:00 P. M. Anthony B. Gioffre, III, Attorney for the owner of Watermark Pointe, offered an explanation of the intent of the proposed legislation. RESULT: HELD [UNANIMOUS]

Next: 9/15/2020 3:45 PM AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson 7. 2020-80 - PROPOSED PUBLIC HEARING RE: AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331-115.1, ZONING CODE, RE: R1-WF-10 DISTRICT - Resolution directing Public Hearing relative to amending Section 331-115.1, Special Permit Uses in the R1-WF-10 District, of Chapter 331, Zoning, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle, and related map amendments. Public Hearing relative to proposed amendment to Chapter 331, Zoning Code, is scheduled for July 14, 2020

Tuesday, September 15, 2020, at 7:00 P. M. RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson

LAW DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE:

8. PROPOSED RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SELL THREE PARCELS ACQUIRED THROUGH AN IN REM FORECLOSURE JUDGMENT - Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sell three parcels acquired through in rem foreclosure via public auction. RESULT: MOVED TO CONSENT AGENDA [UNANIMOUS]

Next: 7/21/2020 6:15 PM AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson 9. SALES AND COMPENSATING USE TAXES - PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, NEW YORK, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 102 OF MAY 4, 1976, IMPOSING SALES AND COMPENSATING USE TAXES, AS AMENDED, TO INCREASE THE RATE OF SALES AND COMPENSATING USE TAX FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2021 AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2023 RESULT: MOVED TO CONSENT AGENDA [UNANIMOUS]

Next: 7/21/2020 6:15 PM AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS:

10. PROPOSED AWARD OF PAVEMENT ENHANCEMENTS PROJECT 20-012 - Resolution accepting the lowest responsible bid of ELQ Industries, Inc. relative to pavement enhancements (Project No. 20-012). RESULT: MOVED TO CONSENT AGENDA [UNANIMOUS]

Next: 7/21/2020 6:15 PM AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson 11. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE RE: PARKING REGULATION CHANGE - VICTORY BOULEVARD - Ordinance amending Section 312-83, Schedule XII: Parking Prohibited at all Times, of Chapter 312, Vehicles and Traffic, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle (Victory Boulevard). It was noted that area residents will be notified of the proposed change in parking regulations. RESULT: MOVED TO CONSENT AGENDA [UNANIMOUS]

Next: 7/21/2020 6:15 PM AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson July 14, 2020

12. PROPOSED AWARD OF STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 19-024B - Resolution accepting the lowest dollar bid of Verde Electric Maintenance Corp. relative to street lighting improvements and repairs at various locations (Project No. 19-024B). RESULT: MOVED TO CONSENT AGENDA [UNANIMOUS]

Next: 7/21/2020 6:15 PM AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson 13. PROPOSED AWARD OF BID RE: 2020 STREET RESURFACING OF VARIOUS STREETS - Resolution accepting the lowest dollar bid of ELQ Industries, Inc. relative to resurfacing of various streets for 2020. RESULT: MOVED TO CONSENT AGENDA [UNANIMOUS]

Next: 7/21/2020 6:15 PM AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson 14. 2020-81 - PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE RE: TRAFFIC REGULATION CHANGE - KINGS HIGHWAY AND SYCAMORE AVENUE - Ordinance amending Section 312-79 (Schedule VIII: Stop Intersections) of Chapter 312 (Vehicles & Traffic) of the Code of the City of New Rochelle (Kings Highway and Sycamore Avenue). RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION:

15. 2020-82 - PROPOSED ACCEPTANCE OF GIFT FROM FRIENDS OF NEW ROCHELLE PARKS - Resolution authorizing the City Manager to accept the gift of a 2014 NV Passenger Van from Nissan of New Rochelle for the Friends of New Rochelle Parks on behalf of the Parks and Recreation Department. RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson

POLICE DEPARTMENT:

16. PROPOSED ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FROM BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20 CORONAVIRUS SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING PROGRAM, PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO 2020 BUDGET - Ordinance accepting the U.S. Department of Justice, BJA FY 20 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program Grant in the amount of $45,242.00, and amending Ordinance No. 270 of 2019, the Budget of the City of New Rochelle for 2020 (Police Department). RESULT: MOVED TO CONSENT AGENDA [UNANIMOUS]

Next: 7/21/2020 6:15 PM AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES: July 14, 2020

CITY MANAGER:

CITY COUNCIL:

17. 2020-83 - PROPOSED CREATION OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE - Resolution creating the African-American Advisory Committee. Sponsored by Mayor Noam Bramson and Council Member Yadira Ramos-Herbert RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Yadira Ramos Herbert, District 3 Council Member SECONDER: Noam Bramson, Mayor AYES: Lopez, Tarantino Jr, Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, Bramson

SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM(S):

UNFINISHED BUSINESS

NEW BUSINESS: July Regular Legislative Meeting, Tuesday, July 21, 2020, at 6:15 P. M.; August, Recess; September Committee of the Whole Sessiion, Tuesday, September 15, 2020, at 3:45 P. M.; September Regular Legislative Meeting, Tuesday, September 22, 2020, at 6:15 P. M.

DISCUSSION ITEM(S):

18. NEW ROCHELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT (NRPD) SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Joseph F. Schaller, Police Commissioner, and Robert Gazzola, Deputy Police Commissioner, distributed the Special Report to City Council. Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager, reviewed the Executive Order on New York State Police Reform and Reinvention Collaborative issued by Governor Andrew Cuomo. The Executive Order requires each government entity in New York with a police agency to perform a comprehensive review of current police force deployments, strategies, policies, procedures and practices and to develop a plan to improve such deployments, strategies, policies procedures and practices for submission to the City Council for adoption no later than April 1, 2021. City Manager Strome alluded to the appointment of a 15 voting member board, to be selected by him in consultation with the City Council, for the development of a plan for submission to City Council on October 9, 2020, for review at the October 13, 2020, Committee of the Whole Session, in preparation of the submission of the final report for adoption by City Council prior by April 1, 2021. Deputy Police Commissioner Gazzola gave a summary presentation of the Special Report. (See report attached). It was agreed that the Special Report be discussed further at the Regular Legislative Meeting, Tuesday, July 21, 2020. RESULT: HELD

Next: 7/21/2020 6:15 PM

EXECUTIVE SESSION

Moved and seconded by Council Members Lopez, Tarantno, Ramos-Herbert, Hyden, Kaye, Fried, and Mayor Bramson, and approved. Subject(s): Litigation and Personnel. July 14, 2020

PUBLIC HEARINGS:

SPEAKER(S) (VISUALLY AND BY TELEPHONE) RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE 82, SECTION 3 (2002 : Joyce Furfero, 1373 Weaver Street; Frederick P. Wiener, 324 Beechmont Drive; Emmeline Swanson, 17 Mongomery Circle; Scott Swanson, 17 Montgomery Circle; Robert McCaffrey, 157 Mt. Joy Place; Peter Altomare, 57 Pinebrook Road; Gregory Varian, 35 Sidney Street; Philip Holmes, 148 Montgomery Circle; Henry Kiernan, 220 Pinebrook Boulevard.

CITIZENS TO BE HEARD

SPEAKER(S) (VISUALLY AND BY TELEPHONE): Bruce Saloway, 76 Vaughn Avenue; Philip Holmes, 148 Montgomery Circle; Michael Yellin, 38 Lakeside Drive; Suzanne Nolan, 152 Clove Road; Gregory Varian, 35 Sidney Street; Myriam Decime, 11 Mt. Joy Place; Robert McCaffrey, 157 Mt. Joy Place; Vincent Malfetano, 9 Fairview Place.

ADJOURNMENT

The meeting was adjourned at 7:58 PM.

Michelle Oliveros, City Clerk

City of New Rochelle City Clerk

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Michelle Oliveros, City Clerk DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: INSTRUCTIONS - REGISTER TO SPEAK AT PUBLIC HEARINGS OR CITIZENS TO BE HEARD PORTIONS OF MEETING DISCUSSION ITEM Due to the ongoing COVID-19 public health crisis and related Executive Orders issued by Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, the City Council will not be able to accommodate any in-person public attendance or participation for Citizens to be Heard or Public Hearings.. Nonetheless, and in furtherance of the provisions of Section 859-a of the Act requiring interested parties be provided a reasonable opportunity, both orally and in writing, to present their views, Citizens to be Heard and Public Hearings will be broadcast live on the’ Citys website and cable public access channel on television (Optimum Channel 75 / Verizon Channel 28). In addition, the City Council will allow the public to provide oral comments in real time via telephone or virtually through Microsoft Teams. If you wish to register to speak during either of these opportunities, please follow these instructions:

Email City Clerk Michelle Oliveros at [email protected] , with the following information: • Full Name • Email Address • Phone Number • Address of Residence • Comment request: Citizens to be Heard or Public Hearing • Method of participation: phone or internet

The deadline to register to speak and submit written comments for the July 14 meeting is Monday, July 13 by 12 noon.. The City Clerk will confirm receipt of your registration following submission and provide further information. For more information contact the City Clerk’s Office at (914) 654-2159

Packet Pg. 7 1

City of New Rochelle Development

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Luiz Aragon, Development Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PETITION RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE 81, SECTION 3, (2002) Proposed Ordinance Amending Ordinance 81 of the City of New Rochelle For Iona College Petition – Dormitory Occupancy Limits

Introduction: Iona College has submitted a petition dated May 28, 2020 through its counsel Arnold & Porter to the City seeking to amend Ordinance 81, Section 3, regarding occupancy levels for dormitory buildings located on their campus, specifically Block 1556, Lot 158. See enclosed application with exhibits including the proposed revision to Ordinance 81. As discussed below, this issue has been periodically reviewed over the years since the ordinance was originally adopted in 2002.

Review: The subject site includes Loftus Hall, Hales Hall and Conese Hall. It is bound by North Avenue to the east, Mayflower Avenue to the south, residential properties primarily fronting on Mount Joy Place to the west, and Summit Avenue to the north.

Ordinance 81 was adopted in 2002 and limited occupancy to a maximum of 696 students residing in the dormitories, without resident advisors. This was amended in 2011 to allow the “maximum number of students as permitted by applicable local and state regulations”, with an expiration date of five years after the amendment. The ordinance was set to expire in September of 2018, but Council allowed a two-year extension by Ordinance No. 2018-61 (3-20-2018).

Prior to granting the two-year extension, an analysis of these buildings by Iona’s consultant found that they could accommodate 2,057 occupants, based on the IBC Building and Fire Code, and 1,043 based on the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York’s College and University Residence Hall Guidelines. The City’s consultant verified Iona’s findings, but noted the College was not in compliance with local Ordinance 81 at the time.

It is important to note that the 696 maximum occupancy limit figure was established nearly two decades ago. Fortunately, Iona has been able to grow, and along with that growth, there is obviously a need for additional housing. Further, subsequent amendments to Ordinance 81 have permitted over 696 students residing in these buildings since 2011.

Packet Pg. 8 1

In their petition, Iona cites the need to remain competitive with other colleges, which includes the need to expand housing options. Their request is to permanently eliminate local restrictions on occupancy, leaving it to the regulations set forth by the IBC Building and Fire Code, and by the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York.

Recommendation: It is recommended that Council give consideration to the amendment as proposed by Iona College with an amendment to section 3 as proposed to state: “Upon compliance with all provisions of state and local law, the Bureau of Buildings shall issue …” It is further recommended that Council set a public hearing and declare itself Lead Agency for compliance with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (an Environmental Assessment Form is attached.)

Packet Pg. 9 1

LEGISLATION

ATTACHMENTS: 1. May 2020 Iona Petition 2. SEAF Dorm Occupancy Part 1 3. SEAF Dorm Occupancy Part 2 4. SEAF Dorm Occupancy Part 3 5. Planning Board Recommendation re Petition - Iona College Dormitory PH 7 14 20

Packet Pg. 10 1.a Attachment: May 2020 Iona Petition (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 11 1.a Attachment: May 2020 Iona Petition (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 12 1.a Attachment: May 2020 Iona Petition (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 13 1.a Attachment: May 2020 Iona Petition (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 14 1.a Attachment: May 2020 Iona Petition (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 15 1.a Attachment: May 2020 Iona Petition (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 16 1.a Attachment: May 2020 Iona Petition (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 17 1.a Attachment: May 2020 Iona Petition (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 18 1.a Attachment: May 2020 Iona Petition (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 19 1.a Attachment: May 2020 Iona Petition (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 20 1.a Attachment: May 2020 Iona Petition (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 21 1.a Attachment: May 2020 Iona Petition (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 22 1.b Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information

Instructions for Completing

Part 1 – Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information.

Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item.

Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information

Name of Action or Project:

Project Location (describe, and attach a location map):

Brief Description of Proposed Action:

Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone:

E-Mail: Address:

City/PO: State: Zip Code:

1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO YES administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval:

3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? ______acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? ______acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? ______acres Attachment: SEAF Dorm Occupancy Part 1 (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3) 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: □ Urban Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) □ Forest Agriculture Aquatic Other(Specify): Parkland

Page 1 of 3 SEAF 2019 Packet Pg. 23 1.b 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations?

b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan?

NO YES 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape?

7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes, identify: ______

NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels?

b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action?

c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies:

______

10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES

If No, describe method for providing potable water: ______

______

11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES

If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ______

______

b. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency?

b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody?

If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: ______Attachment: SEAF Dorm Occupancy Part 1 (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

______

Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 24 1.b 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: □Shoreline □ Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional Wetland □ Urban Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or NO YES Federal government as threatened or endangered?

16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES

NO YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes,

a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties?

b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: ______

______

18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:______

______

19._ Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES management facility? If Yes, describe: ______

______

20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or NO YES completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: ______

______

I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE

Applicant/sponsor/name: ______Date: ______

Signature: ______Title:______Attachment: SEAF Dorm Occupancy Part 1 (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 25 1.c

Part 2 Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the conc

No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land?

3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community?

4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Attachment: SEAF Dorm Occupancy Part 2 (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

PRINT FORM Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 26 1.d Attachment: SEAF Dorm Occupancy Part 3 (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002), SECTION 3)

Packet Pg. 27 1.e

CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, NEW YORK DEPARTIWENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGBOARD

Members Present: Brown, Contreras, Dodds-Brown, Lipow, Mercado, Pitocchi, Smith Members Absent: None Introduced: June 19, 2020 Adopted: June 19, 2020 Moved By: Lipow Seconded By: Pitocchi Abstained: None Opposed: None Passed: Unanimously Positive Recommendation Dormitory Occupancy Limits

RESOLUTIONNO. 41-2020

WHEREAS, the Board received a referral from City Council regarding a petition from lona College pertaining to permitting to dormitory occupancy limits; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Board finds the proposed petition to be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. Now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, the New Rochelle Planning Board hereby gives a positive recommendation on the referred petition.

Dated: July ^ , 2020

E. Sch z, A C Planning Board Clerk

Filed City Clerk's Office July ^ 2020

City Clerk

Res. No.41-2019 Page 1 of 1 Attachment: Planning Board Recommendation re Petition - Iona College Dormitory PH 7 14 20 (2036 : PETITION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 81 (2002),

Packet Pg. 28 ADOPTED: 2020-78 July 14, 2020 2

City of New Rochelle Development

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Luiz Aragon, Development Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 312-62 PART E RE: PARKING PERMIT REFUND REQUIREMENTS - Ordinance amending Section 312-62, Parking Lots, of Chapter 312, Vehicles and Traffic, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle.

BACKGROUND: Based on available supply and occupancy associated with municipal parking facilities, the Department of Development hereby recommends the following amendment to the current parking permit rules and regulations in an effort to better manage permit availability in municipal facilities.

ISSUE: In recent years, the City of New Rochelle has seen a dramatic increase in the waiting lists for parking permits in Municipally-owned facilities. In an effort to help reduce the time permit applicants spend on waiting lists and to simplify the refund process for current permit holders, the Department of Development is proposing to eliminate all current refund requirements (loss of employment, death, illness or maternity leave). This proposed change will allow current permit holders the ability to receive a prorated refund at a time of their choosing without needing to satisfy a required condition.

RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Department of Development that the attached changes to §312- 62 Part E be adopted.

Packet Pg. 29 ADOPTED: 2020-78 July 14, 2020 2

LEGISLATION ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 312-62, PARKING LOTS, OF CHAPTER 312, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE.

BE IT ORDAINED by the City of New Rochelle:

Section 1. Section 312-62, Parking Lots, of Chapter 312, Vehicles and Traffic, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle, is hereby amended to read as follows:

§ 312-62. Parking lots.

(o) Permission for parking is granted subject to the rights of the City of New Rochelle to cancel, in which case provision shall be made for the refund for the unexpired rental term. Refunds shall be made for only the following reasons, as per City Administrative Regulation No. 3.72. Any person currently issued a valid parking permit may submit a written request for a prorated refund of the unused portion of the parking permit fee paid. Refund requests must be sent to the City’s Public Properties and Parking Manager. Refunds will be issued upon submission of a completed Refund Request Form and will be prorated based on whole months remaining on the permit. For example, a refund requested any time of any month would be prorated effective the start of the next month; however, the parking permit will be terminated based on the termination request date provided on the Refund Request Form. Annual permits will be issued a refund for the prorated monthly rate of the annual permit cost and semiannual permits will be issued a refund for the prorated monthly rate of the semiannual permit cost. Please note that any refund issued will terminate the parking permit. In the event that a permit is requested in the future by the refunded permit holder, the permit holder will be waitlisted if such a list exists at the time of application.

[(1) Loss of employment (documented by employer).] [(2) Health condition affecting ability to drive or work (documented by a physician).] [(3) Extended Maternity Leave (documented by a physician).] [(4) Death of permit holder (documented by death certificate).]

Matter [bracketed] deleted. Matter underlined added.

Packet Pg. 30 3

City of New Rochelle Development

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Luiz Aragon, Development Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE: HERITAGE HOMES PLAYGROUND - Resolution declaring Lead Agency status relative to the Heritage Homes Playground project.

INTRODUCTION As you know, in 2018 the City was awarded $10 million through the Governor's Downtown Revitalization Initiative (DRI). The projects submitted to the State included a new playground at the site of the former Hartley Houses, a blighted public housing complex that was demolished to make way for Heritage Homes, a new affordable housing complex located off of Lincoln Avenue. In this final phase of the project, a 32,000 square foot playground and gathering space for the residents of Heritage Homes is being constructed at 51 Winthrop Avenue. The City is partnering with MacQuesten Development to construct the park.

Last month, the City Council resolved to declare its intent to become Lead Agency, after taking this action, staff circulated its intent to other involved and interested agencies. All interested and involved agencies consented to the City of New Rochelle acting as Lead Agency and issuance of a determination of environmental significance for the above-mentioned project. Attached are SEQR Short EAF Parts 2 & 3 for your review.

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended by staff that the City Council authorize a resolution declaring the City as Lead Agency for the proposed project and; as the project has been deemed to have no adverse impact on the environment and is prepared to issue a negative declaration of environmental significance.

Packet Pg. 31 3

LEGISLATION RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY STATUS RELATIVE TO THE HERITAGE HOMES PLAYGROUND PROJECT.

WHEREAS, this City Council hereby wishes to declare itself to be the Lead Agency with respect to the environmental review of the Heritage Homes Playground project; and

WHEREAS, this City Council finds the Proposed Action to be an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA; and

WHEREAS, the Department of Development has prepared and submitted an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) for the Proposed Action, on file for inspection with the City Clerk’s Office; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED that this City Council hereby declares itself to be the lead agency with respect to the proposed project and directs that the proposed amendment be sent to the Planning Board and the Westchester County Planning Department for review and recommendation.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Heritage Homes EAF Signed

Packet Pg. 32 3.a

Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information

Instructions for Corn letin

Part 1 - Project Information. The appUcant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the applicationfor q)proval or funding,are subject to publicreview, and maybe subject to furtherverification. CompletePart 1 basedon infonnadon cun-eirtly available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information.

Complete all itemsin Part 1. Youmay also provide anyadditional information which you believe will beneeded by or usefulto the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item.

Part 1 - Project and Spomor Information CKyoTNewRochelte Name ofAction or Project: Heritage Homes Rararound ProjectLocation (describe, and attach a locationraap): 51 WinthropAvenue BriefDescription of Proposed Action: The City ofNew Rocheileand its partners, MacQuesten Development, propose to construct a 32K sf park and playground for the residentsof Heritage Homes.

NaineofApplicsmt or Sponsor: Telephone: 9146542023

CityofNewRochelte B-Mail: srelder@newrochelleny. com Address: 515 North Avenue, CHy Hall City/PO: State: Zip Code: New Rochelle New York 10801 1. Does the proposed action only mvolve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NQ YES admimstrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent ofthe proposed action and the enviromnental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Doesthe proposedaction require a pemut, approval or fundingfrom anyother government Agency? NO YES IfYes, list agency(s)name and permit or approval: NYSHCR- GrantDisbursement

3. a. Total acreage ofthe site of the proposed action? 6. 1 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? acres c. Total acreage(project site and any contiguousproperties) owned 6.1 or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? acres

4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoinmg or near the proposed action: f71Urban II Rural(non-agriculture) [_| Industrial II Commercial E] Residential(suburban) D Forest n Agriculture Q Aquatic D Other(Specify): D Parkland Attachment: Heritage Homes EAF Signed (2056 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE: HERITAGE HOMES

Page 1 of 3 SEAF2019

Packet Pg. 33 3.a

5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A pennitted use underthe zoning regulations? D a b. Consistentwith the adoptedcomprehensive plan? D a NO YES 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character ofthe existing built or natural landscape? a

7. Is the site ofthe proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state li^ed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES H"Yes, identify: D NO YES 8. a. Will theproposed action result in a substantialincrease in traffic abovepresent levels? D b. Are public transportadon services available at or near the site of the proposed action?

c. Are anypedestrian accommodations or bicycleroutes avaUableon ornear the rite ofthe proposed action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requiranents? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: D

10. ul the proposed action connect to an existing public/private wafer supply? NO YES

IfNo, describe method for providing potable water: NotAppHcabte

11. Will the proposed action comiect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES

IfNo, describemethod for providing wastewatertreatment: Not Applicable D

b. Is Ae project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for archaeologicalsites on theNY StateHistoric Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? D b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? D If Yes, identify the wetland or vraterbody and extent of alterations insquare feet or acres: Attachment: Heritage Homes EAF Signed (2056 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE: HERITAGE HOMES

Page2 of 3

Packet Pg. 34 3.a

14. Identifythe typical habitattypes that occuron, or arclikely to befound on theproject site. Checkall thatapply: DShoreline Q Forest F~\ Aericultural/erasslands D Early mid-successional D Wetland B Urban D Suburban 15. Does the site ofthe proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or NO YES Federal government as threatened or endangered?

16. Is theproject sitelocated in the 100-yearflood plan? NO YES

17. Will the proposed action create storai water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? NO YES IfYes, D a. Will stonn water discharges flow to adjacent propaties? D D b. Will storm waterdischarges be directedto establishedconveyance systems (runoffand stonndrains)? D If Yes, briefly describe:

18. Doesthe proposedaction include construction or otheractivities that would result in theimpaundment of water NO YES or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:

19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES management facility? If Yes, describe: D

20.Hasthe siteof the proposedaction or anadjoining property been the subjectofremediatipn (ongoing or NO YES completed) forhazardous waste? If Yes, describe:

Asbestos Removal was completed in Q12020 prior to demolition of the former residential building

I CERTIFYTHAT THE INFORMATIONPROVTOED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW DG Applicant/spo sor/n e: suzanne^<^ Date:5/27/2020 Signature: tf^-^-lV v . _Tide: se"'c"'pro^ectMana9er Attachment: Heritage Homes EAF Signed (2056 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE: HERITAGE HOMES

PRINT FORM Page3 of 3

Packet Pg. 35 3.a

Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: Date:

Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment

Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answerall ofthe followingquestions in Part2 usingthe informationcontained in Part 1 andother materials submittedby theproject sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guidedby the concept "Have my responsesbeen reasonable considering the scale andcontext of the proposed action?"

No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? n D 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? D 3. Will the proposed action inyair the character or quality of the existing community? n 4. Will the proposed acdonhave an impact on the environmental characteristicsthat causedthe establishmentof a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? !.! D 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level oftt-affic or affect existing infrastmcture for mass transit, hiking or walkway? n 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? n D 7. Will the proposed actionimpact existing: n a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? a 8. Will the proposedaction impair the characteror qualityof important historic, archaeological, n architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposedaction result in an adversechange to natural resources (e. g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? D 10. Will theproposed action result in an increasein thepotendal for erosion, floodingor drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? n Attachment: Heritage Homes EAF Signed (2056 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE: HERITAGE HOMES

PRINT FORM Page 1 of 2 SEAF2019

Packet Pg. 36 3.a AgencyUse Only [If applicable] Project: Date:

Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance

Forevery question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to largeimpact mayoccur", or if there is a needto explainwhy a particularelement ofthe proposed action may or will not result in a significantadverse environmental impact, please completePart 3. Part3 should,in sufficientdetail, identify the impact, includingany measures ordesign elements that havebeen included by the project sponsorto avoidor reduceimpacts. Part 3 shouldalso explainhow the leadagency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Eachpotential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- temi, long-term and cumulative impacts.

Checkthis box if you ve determined,based on the informationand analysis above, andany supporting documentation, thatthe proposed cti n may result in one or morepotentially large or significantadverse inyacts andan environmental imp 3 I

Si ture of s on Officerin LeadAgency Sign r fPeparer(i di eren fromResponsible Officer) Attachment: Heritage Homes EAF Signed (2056 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE: HERITAGE HOMES

PRINT FORM Page 2 of 2

Packet Pg. 37 4

City of New Rochelle Development

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Luiz Aragon, Development Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE: QUAKER RIDGE ROAD COMPLETE STREETS - Resolution declaring Lead Agency relative to the Quaker Ridge Road Complete Streets Design program.

INTRODUCTION As you may recall, in 2018 the City received a Federal Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) grant award through New York State DOT to design and implement a Complete Streets program for Quaker Ridge Road in the North End of New Rochelle. The Department of Development and its consultants, Barton & Loguidice, DPC (B&L) submitted the draft Design Report to NYSDOT on February 21, 2020. The City is now in receipt of the State's comments that need to be addressed prior to approval of a Final Design Report. Those comments are being addressed by B&L; however, one anticipated comment was that the City must comply with all SEQRA regulations prior to approval.

In May, the City Council resolved to declare its intent to become Lead Agency, after taking this action, staff circulated its intent to other involved and interested agencies abiding by the 30-day comment period. All interested and involved agencies consented to the City of New Rochelle acting as Lead Agency and issuance of a determination of environmental significance for the above-mentioned project. Attached are SEQR Full EAF Parts 2 & 3 for your review.

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended by staff that the City Council authorize a resolution declaring the City as Lead Agency for the proposed project and as the project has been deemed an Unlisted Action and is prepared to issue a negative declaration of environmental significance.

Packet Pg. 38 4

LEGISLATION RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY STATUS RELATIVE TO THE QUAKER RIDGE ROAD COMPLETE STREETS DESIGN PROGRAM.

WHEREAS, this City Council hereby wishes to declare itself to be the Lead Agency with respect to the environmental review of the Quaker Ridge Road Complete Streets Design Program; and

WHEREAS, this City Council finds the Proposed Action to be an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA; and

ATTACHMENTS: 1. SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80

Packet Pg. 39 Full Environmental Assessment Form 4.a Part 1 - Project and Setting

Instructions for Completing Part 1

Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification.

Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information.

Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete.

A. Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project:

Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map):

Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need):

Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address:

City/PO: State: Zip Code:

Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address:

City/PO: State: Zip Code:

Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail: Address:

City/PO: State: Zip Code:

Page 1 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

FEAF 2019 Packet Pg. 40 4.a B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City Counsel, Town Board, 9 Yes 9 No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village 9 Yes 9 No Planning Board or Commission c. City, Town or 9 Yes 9 No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies 9 Yes 9 No e. County agencies 9 Yes 9 No f. Regional agencies 9 Yes 9 No g. State agencies 9 Yes 9 No h. Federal agencies 9 Yes 9 No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? 9 Yes 9 No

ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? 9 Yes 9 No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? 9 Yes 9 No

C. Planning and Zoning

C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the 9 Yes 9 No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. • If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site 9 Yes 9 No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action 9 Yes 9 No would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway; 9 Yes 9 No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): ______c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, 9 Yes 9 No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ______

Page 2 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 41 C.3. Zoning 4.a a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? ______b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? 9 Yes 9 No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ______

C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? ______b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? ______c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? ______d. What parks serve the project site? ______

D. Project Details

D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? ______b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? ______acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? ______acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? ______acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? 9 Yes 9 No i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ______Units: ______d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ______ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? 9 Yes 9 No iii. Number of lots proposed? ______iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum ______Maximum ______e. Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? 9 Yes 9 No i. If No, anticipated period of construction: _____ months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated _____ • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) _____ month _____ year • Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: ______

Page 3 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 42 f. Does the project include new residential uses? 9 Yes 9 No 4.a If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ______At completion of all phases ______g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i. Total number of structures ______ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ______height; ______width; and ______length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any 9 Yes 9 No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ______ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: 9 Ground water 9 Surface water streams 9 Other specify: ______iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. ______iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ______million gallons; surface area: ______acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ______height; ______length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ______

D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? 9 Yes 9 No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? ______ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ______• Over what duration of time? ______iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ______iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? 9 Yes 9 No If yes, describe. ______v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? ______acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? ______acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? ______feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? 9 Yes 9 No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: ______b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment 9 Yes 9 No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______

Page 4 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 43 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or 4.a alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: ______iii.Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes 9 No If Yes, describe: ______iv. Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: ______• expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:______• purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ______• proposed method of plant removal: ______• if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): ______v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: ______c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: ______gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: ______• Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? 9 Yes 9 No • Is the project site in the existing district? 9 Yes 9 No • Is expansion of the district needed? 9 Yes 9 No • Do existing lines serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ______• Source(s) of supply for the district: ______iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No If, Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: ______• Date application submitted or anticipated: ______• Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: ______v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ______vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity: ______gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: ______gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): ______iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: ______• Name of district: ______• Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? 9 Yes 9 No • Is the project site in the existing district? 9 Yes 9 No • Is expansion of the district needed? 9 Yes 9 No

Page 5 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 44 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No 4.a • Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ______iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: ______• Date application submitted or anticipated: ______• What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? ______v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ______vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: ______e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point 9 Yes 9 No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ acres (parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. ______iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ______• If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ______• Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? 9 Yes 9 No iv. Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? 9 Yes 9 No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel 9 Yes 9 No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) ______ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ______iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ______g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, 9 Yes 9 No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet 9 Yes 9 No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: • ______Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) • ______Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) • ______Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) • ______Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) • ______Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) • ______Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)

Page 6 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 45 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, 9 Yes 9 No 4.a landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ______ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ______i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as 9 Yes 9 No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): ______j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial 9 Yes 9 No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): Morning Evening Weekend Randomly between hours of ______to ______. ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks): ______iii. Parking spaces: Existing ______Proposed ______Net increase/decrease ______iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? Yes No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe: ______vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? 9 Yes 9 No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric 9 Yes 9 No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing 9 Yes 9 No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand 9 Yes 9 No for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ______ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): ______iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation? 9 Yes 9 No l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: • Monday - Friday: ______• Monday - Friday: ______• Saturday: ______• Saturday: ______• Sunday: ______• Sunday: ______• Holidays: ______• Holidays: ______

Page 7 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 46 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, 9 Yes 9 No 4.a operation, or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: ______ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? 9 Yes 9 No Describe: ______n. W ill th e prop osed actio n hav e outd oor ligh ting? 9 Yes 9 No If yes: i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? 9 Yes 9 No Describe: ______o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) 9 Yes 9 No or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s) to be stored ______ii. Volume(s) ______per unit time ______(e.g., month, year) iii. Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities:______q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, 9 Yes 9 No insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): ______ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? 9 Yes 9 No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal 9 Yes 9 No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: ______tons per ______(unit of time) • Operation : ______tons per ______(unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: ______• Operation: ______iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: ______• Operation: ______

Page 8 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 47 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? 9 Yes 9 No4.a If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ______ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • ______Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or • ______Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: ______years t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous 9 Yes 9 No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ______ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ______iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ______v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: ______If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: ______

E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action

E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. 9 Urban 9 Industrial 9 Commercial 9 Residential (suburban) 9 Rural (non-farm) 9 Forest 9 Agriculture 9 Aquatic 9 Other (specify): ______ii. If mix of uses, generally describe: ______b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres +/-) • Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces • Forested • Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) • Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) • Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) • Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) • Other Describe: ______

Page 9 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 48 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? 9 Yes 9 No 4.a i. If Yes: explain: ______d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed 9 Yes 9 No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: ______e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: ______feet • Dam length: ______feet • Surface area: ______acres • Volume impounded: ______gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam=s existing hazard classification: ______iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: ______f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, 9 Yes 9 No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? 9 Yes 9 No • If yes, cite sources/documentation: ______ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: ______iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: ______g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin 9 Yes 9 No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: ______h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any 9 Yes 9 No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site 9 Yes 9 No Remediation database? Check all that apply: 9 Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ______9 Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ______9 Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:______iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? 9 Yes 9 No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): ______

Page 10 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 49 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? 9 Yes 9 No 4.a • If yes, DEC site ID number: ______• Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ______• Describe any use limitations: ______• Describe any engineering controls: ______• Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? 9 Yes 9 No • Explain: ______

E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ______feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? ______% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: ______% ______% ______% d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: ______feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: 9 Well Drained: _____% of site 9 Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site 9 Poorly Drained _____% of site f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 9 0-10%: _____% of site 9 10-15%: _____% of site 9 15% or greater: _____% of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, describe: ______h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, 9 Yes 9 No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, 9 Yes 9 No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: • Streams: Name ______Classification ______• Lakes or Ponds: Name ______Classification ______• Wetlands: Name ______Approximate Size ______• Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) ______v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired 9 Yes 9 No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: ______i. Is the project site in a designated Floo dway? 9 Yes 9 No j. Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain? 9 Yes 9 No k. Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain? 9 Yes 9 No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: ______

Page 11 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 50 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______4.a ______n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): ______ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ______iii. Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: ______acres • Following completion of project as proposed: ______acres • Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as 9 Yes 9 No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? If Yes: i. Species and listing (endangered or threatened):______p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of 9 Yes 9 No special concern? If Yes: i. Species and listing:______q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? 9 Yes 9 No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ______

E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to 9 Yes 9 No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: ______b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? 9 Yes 9 No i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ______ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): ______c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National 9 Yes 9 No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: 9 Biological Community 9 Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ______d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. CEA name: ______ii. Basis for designation: ______iii. Designating agency and date: ______

Page 12 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 51 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district 9 Yes 9 No 4.a which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: 9 Archaeological Site 9 Historic Building or District ii. Name: ______iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: ______f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for 9 Yes 9 No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): ______ii. Basis for identification: ______h. Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local 9 Yes 9 No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: ______ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): ______iii. Distance between project and resource: ______miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers 9 Yes 9 No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ______ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? 9 Yes 9 No

F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project.

If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them.

G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge.

Applicant/Sponsor Name ______Date______

Signature______Title______

Page 13 of 13 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 52 Agency Use Only [If applicable]4.a Full Environmental Assessment Form Project : Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Date : Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency=s reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity.

If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: • Review all of the information provided in Part 1. • Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. • If you answer “Yes” to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer “No” to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. • Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box “Moderate to large impact may occur.” • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. • If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consult the workbook. • When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the Awhole action@. • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, NO YES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 2. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is E2d 9 9 less than 3 feet.

b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f 9 9

c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or E2a 9 9 generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons D2a 9 9 of natural material. e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year D1e 9 9 or in multiple phases. f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical D2e, D2q 9 9 disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B1i 9 9

h. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______

Page 1 of 10 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

FEAF 2019 Packet Pg. 53 4.a 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, NO YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, move on to Section 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached: ______E2g 9 9 ______b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3c 9 9 registered National Natural Landmark. Specific feature: ______c. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______

3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water NO YES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h) If “Yes”, answer questions a - l. If “No”, move on to Section 4. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b, D1h 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a D2b 9 9 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a 9 9 from a wetland or water body. d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h 9 9 tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body. e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, D2a, D2h 9 9 runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal D2c 9 9 of water from surface water. g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge D2d 9 9 of wastewater to surface water(s). h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of D2e 9 9 stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h 9 9 downstream of the site of the proposed action. j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q, E2h 9 9 around any water body. k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, D1a, D2d 9 9 wastewater treatment facilities.

Page 2 of 10 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 54 4.a l. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______

4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or NO YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 5. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand D2c 9 9 on supplies from existing water supply wells. b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2c 9 9 withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: ______c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and D1a, D2c 9 9 sewer services. d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d, E2l 9 9 e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c, E1f, 9 9 where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. E1g, E1h f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products D2p, E2l 9 9 over ground water or an aquifer. g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 E2h, D2q, 9 9 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E2l, D2c h. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______

5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. NO YES (See Part 1. E.2) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, move on to Section 6. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2j 9 9 c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k 9 9 d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage D2b, D2e 9 9 patterns. e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, E2i, 9 9 E2j, E2k f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, E1e 9 9 or upgrade?

Page 3 of 10 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 55 g. Other impacts: ______4.a 9 9 ______

6. Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. NO YES (See Part 1. D.2.f., D.2.h, D.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, move on to Section 7. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) D2g 9 9 ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N2O) D2g 9 9 iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) D2g 9 9 iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF ) D2g 9 9 6 9 v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of D2g 9 hydrochloroflourocarbons (HFCs) emissions vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2h 9 9 b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g 9 9 hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions D2f, D2g 9 9 rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU=s per hour. d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in “a” through “c”, D2g 9 9 above. e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 D2s 9 9 ton of refuse per hour. f. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______

7. Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m.-q.) NO YES If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 8. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any E2o 9 9 threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2o 9 9 any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal government. c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any E2p 9 9 species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p 9 9 any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government.

Page 4 of 10 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 56 4.a e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural E3c 9 9 Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any E2n 9 9 portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: ______g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or E2m 9 9 over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site.

9 9 h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, E1b grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type & information source: ______i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of D2q 9 9 herbicides or pesticides. j. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______

8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) NO YES If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 9. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the E2c, E3b 9 9 NYS Land Classification System. b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land E1a, Elb 9 9 (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b 9 9 active agricultural land. d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural E1b, E3a 9 9 uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land El a, E1b 9 9 management system. f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development C2c, C3, 9 9 potential or pressure on farmland. D2c, D2d g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c 9 9 Protection Plan. h. Other impacts: ______9 9

Page 5 of 10 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 57 4.a 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in NO YES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.1.a, E.1.b, E.3.h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, go to Section 10. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local E3h 9 9 scenic or aesthetic resource. b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant E3h, C2b 9 9 screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) 9 9 ii. Year round 9 9 d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h action is: E2q, i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work 9 9 ii. Recreational or tourism based activities E1c 9 9 e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h 9 9 appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed D1a, E1a, 9 9 project: D1f, D1g 0-1/2 mile ½ -3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile g. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______

10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological NO YES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 11. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on the National or E3e 9 9 State Register of Historical Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places. b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3f 9 9 to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3g 9 9 to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: ______

Page 6 of 10 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 58 4.a d. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______If any of the above (a-d) are answered “Moderate to large impact may e. occur”, continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3:

i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part E3e, E3g, 9 9 of the site or property. E3f ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property’s setting or E3e, E3f, 9 9 integrity. E3g, E1a, E1b iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which E3e, E3f, 9 9 are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. E3g, E3h, C2, C3

11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a NO YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.1.c., E.2.q.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 12. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or “ecosystem D2e, E1b 9 9 services”, provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater E2h, storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. E2m, E2o, E2n, E2p b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a, E1c, 9 9 C2c, E2q c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a, C2c 9 9 with few such resources. E1c, E2q d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c, E1c 9 9 community as an open space resource. e. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______

12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical NO YES environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, go to Section 13. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or E3d 9 9 characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d 9 9 characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. c. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______

Page 7 of 10 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 59 4.a 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. NO YES (See Part 1. D.2.j) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 14. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j 9 9 more vehicles. c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j 9 9 d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j 9 9 e. The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j 9 9 f. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______

14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. NO YES (See Part 1. D.2.k) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 15. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation. D2k 9 9 b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission D1f, 9 9 or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a D1q, D2k commercial or industrial use. c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k 9 9 d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square D1g 9 9 feet of building area when completed. e. Other Impacts: ______

15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. NO YES (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 16. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m 9 9 regulation. b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m, E1d 9 9 hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home. c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o 9 9

Page 8 of 10 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 60 4.a d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n 9 9 e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing D2n, E1a 9 9 area conditions. f. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______

16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure NO YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - m. If “No”, go to Section 17. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may cccur occur a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day E1d 9 9 care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community. b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. E1g, E1h 9 9 c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site E1g, E1h 9 9 remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the E1g, E1h 9 9 property (e.g., easement or deed restriction). e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place E1g, E1h 9 9 to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t 9 9 generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q, E1f 9 9 management facility. h. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, E1f 9 9 i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of D2r, D2s 9 9 solid waste. j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of E1f, E1g 9 9 a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. E1h k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill E1f, E1g 9 9 site to adjacent off site structures. l. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the D2s, E1f, 9 9 project site. D2r m. Other impacts: ______

Page 9 of 10 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 61 4.a

17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. NO YES (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, go to Section 18. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action’s land use components may be different from, or in sharp C2, C3, D1a 9 9 contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). E1a, E1b b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village C2 9 9 in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 9 9 d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use C2, C2 9 9 plans. e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3, D1c, 9 9 supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. D1d, D1f, D1d, Elb f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development C4, D2c, D2d 9 9 that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or C2a 9 9 commercial development not included in the proposed action) h. Other: ______9 9 ______

18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. NO YES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, proceed to Part 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas E3e, E3f, E3g 9 9 of historic importance to the community. b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. C4 9 9 schools, police and fire) c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2, C3, D1f 9 9 there is a shortage of such housing. D1g, E1a d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2, E3 9 9 or designated public resources. e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2, C3 9 9 character. f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 9 9 E1a, E1b E2g, E2h g. Other impacts: ______9 9 ______

Page 10 of 10 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 62 Agency Use Only [IfApplicable] Project : 4.a Date : Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance

Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact.

Based on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page, the lead agency can complete its determination of significance.

Reasons Supporting This Determination: To complete this section: • Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact. • Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impact occurring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur. • The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes. • Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. • Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact • For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result. • Attach additional sheets, as needed.

Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE: SEQR Status: Type 1 Unlisted

Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Packet Pg. 63 FEAF 2019 4.a Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, as noted, plus this additional support information

and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact, it is the conclusion of the as lead agency that:

A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued.

B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency:

There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and, therefore, this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions (see 6 NYCRR 617.7(d)).

C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment, and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issued.

Name of Action:

Name of Lead Agency:

Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency:

Title of Responsible Officer:

Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date:

Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Date:

For Further Information: Contact Person: Address: Telephone Number: E-mail:

For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to:

Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located (e.g., Town / City / Village of) Other involved agencies (if any) Applicant (if any) Environmental Notice Bulletin: http://www.dec.ny.gov/enb/enb.html

Page 2 of 2 Attachment: SEQR Parts 1-3 combined_Quaker Ridge Road PIN# 8761.80 (2044 : PROPOSED RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY RE:

Packet Pg. 64 ADOPTED: 2020-79 July 14, 2020 5

City of New Rochelle Development

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Luiz Aragon, Development Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED LEAD AGENCY STATUS RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ZONING CODE, SECTION 331-115.1, R1-WF-10 DISTRICT - Resolution declaring Lead Agency status relative to the proposed Ordinance amending Section 331-115.1, Special Permit Uses in the R1-WF-10 District, of Chapter 331, Zoning, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle, and related map amendments.

Resolution declaring Lead Agency status relative to the proposed Ordinance amending Section 331-115.1, Special Permit Uses in the R1-WF-10 District, of Chapter 331, Zoning, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle, and related map amendments.

Packet Pg. 65 ADOPTED: 2020-79 July 14, 2020 5

LEGISLATION RESOLUTION DECLARING LEAD AGENCY STATUS RELATIVE TO THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 331-115.1, SPECIAL PERMIT USES IN THE R1-WF-10 DISTRICT, OF CHAPTER 331, ZONING, OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, AND RELATED MAP AMENDMENTS.

WHEREAS, this City Council wishes to declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review of the proposed ordinance amending Section 331-115.1, Special Permit Uses in the R1- WF-10 District, of Chapter 331, Zoning, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle, and related map amendments (“Proposed Action”); and

WHEREAS, this City Council finds the Proposed Action to be an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA; and

BE IT RESOLVED that this City Council hereby declares itself Lead Agency for the Proposed Action and directs that the proposed ordinance and EAF be sent to the New Rochelle Planning Board and the Westchester County Department of Planning for their review and recommendation.

Packet Pg. 66 6

City of New Rochelle Development

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Luiz Aragon, Development Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331-115.1, ZONING CODE, RE: SPECIAL PERMIT IN R1-WF-10 DISTRICT- Proposed Ordinance amending Chapter 331, Zoning Code of the City of New Rochelle, Section 115.1, Special Permit Uses in the R1-WF-10 District (Intro. 7/14/20; Public Hearing 9/15/20)

Introduction: The City adopted amendments to the R1-WF-10 district in 2016 to allow multifamily development as a special permit use. Due to this amendment, an attractive residential development known as Watermark Pointe is now located on the site of the former Beckwith Pointe beach club. While this development highlights a success in the transition of Davenport Neck, as discussed below, staff has identified a clarification needed in the zoning to foster further improvements to the area.

Review: As shown on the accompanying map, the R1-WF-10 district is located on Davenport Neck along the City’s waterfront. It occupies an area that has historically been known for its beach clubs. As the character of this area has changed, and demand for a variety in housing types has grown, the district was amended to allow multifamily dwellings in 2016. Greater restriction on height and density were included where adjacent to single-family residences and parks.

However, staff has identified minor changes needed to properly codify the intent of the prior zoning amendment. As is, the language creates greater restriction on density outside the 150-foot setback than what was intended for sites adjacent to single-family residences or a park. Therefore, in order to achieve the greatest density possible, a developer would have to build several buildings on a site, inside and outside the 150-foot setback area. This would likely create greater impervious surfaces and obstruction of waterfront views, and a less desirable development pattern.

Accordingly, the following amendment is proposed (added language is underlined, removed language is noted with a strikethrough):

Packet Pg. 67 6

A. For structures located in the portion of the lot within 150 feet of either the adjacent single-family residential zoning district (R1-10), the lot line of a lot containing a single- family residential building, public park or public road:

(1) Maximum building height shall not exceed 35 feet and two stories. (2) Density shall not exceed four units per acre for the area within such one-hundred- fifty-foot setback. (3) Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 24 feet each; combined 50 feet.

B. For structures located in the portion of the lot not within 150 feet of either the adjacent single-family residential zoning district (R1-10), the lot line of a lot containing a single- family residential building, public park or public road: (1) Maximum building height shall not exceed 60 feet and five stories. (2) Density shall not to exceed 7.5 units per acre for the area that is beyond such one- hundred-fifty-foot setback. (2) Density may be calculated using the cumulative total area of the lot as follows: i. 4 units per acre for the portion of the lot within the one-hundred-fifty-foot setback; and ii. 7.5 units per acre for the portion of the lot beyond the one-hundred-fifty-foot setback.

Recommendation: Staff recommends that Council set a public hearing on the proposed amendment and refer same to the Planning Board, and Westchester County Planning Board. It is also recommended that the City Council declare itself Lead Agency for the purposes of an environmental review pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF) is attached.

Staff recommends that the Council approve this amendment pending the outcome of the public hearing and responses from the City’s Planning Board, and the Westchester County Planning Board.

Packet Pg. 68 6

LEGISLATION ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 331-115.1, SPECIAL PERMIT USES IN THE R1-WF-10 DISTRICT, OF CHAPTER 331, ZONING, OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, AND RELATED MAP AMENDMENTS.

BE IT ORDAINED by the City of New Rochelle: The Code of the City of New Rochelle, Section 331-115.1, Special Permit Uses in the R1-WF-10 District, is hereby amended as follows: § 331-115.1 Special Permit Uses in the R1-WF-10 District.

Multifamily uses in the R1-WF-10 District.

Multifamily Uses are permitted on lots at least one acre in size and subject to the following requirements. For the purposes of calculating the below dimensional regulations of this § 331- 115.1, the site area shall be based on the net area above the mean high water elevation in accordance with § 331-20.1.

A. For structures located in the portion of the lot within 150 feet of either the adjacent single- family residential zoning district (R1-10), the lot line of a lot containing a single-family residential building, public park or public road:

(1) Maximum building height shall not exceed 35 feet and two stories.

(2) Density shall not exceed four units per acre for the area within such one-hundred-fifty- foot setback.

(3) Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 24 feet each; combined 50 feet.

(1) Maximum building height shall not exceed 60 feet and five stories.

[(2) Density shall not to exceed 7.5 units per acre for the area that is beyond such one- hundred-fifty-foot setback.]

Packet Pg. 69 6

(2) Density may be calculated using the cumulative total area of the lot as follows: i. 4 units per acre for the portion of the lot within the one-hundred-fifty-foot setback; and

ii. 7.5 units per acre for the portion of the lot beyond the one-hundred-fifty-foot setback.

(3) At the discretion of the Building Official, an additional five feet of building height shall be allowed if required to elevate the building above the FEMA base flood elevation (one- hundred-year flood).

(4) Rear yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 20 feet.

Matter [bracketed] deleted. Matter underlined added.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. R1-WF-10 EAF Signed 2. R1-WF-10 Map scan

Packet Pg. 70 6.a

Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information

Instructions for Corn letin

Part 1 - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information.

Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information

Name of Action or Project: City of New Rochelle Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): R1-WF-10 Zoning District

Brief Description of Proposed Action: The City proposes to make a minor amendment to the R1-WF-10zoning district as it relates to special permit uses, specifically, multifamily development. The amendment would clarify the density requirements to be in accordance with the intent of a prior amendment.

Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone:

City of New Rochelle E-Mail: Address: 515 North Avenue

City/PO: State: Zip Code: New Rochelle NY 10801 1. Doesthe proposed action only involve the legislative adoptionof a plan, local law, ordinance, NO YES administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. D E 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval:

3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? acres

4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: Urban II Rural (non-agriculture) I_I Industrial II Commercial L_| Residential (suburban) Forest II Agricultaire || Aquatic II Other(Specify): D Parkland Attachment: R1-WF-10 EAF Signed (2042 : PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331-115.1, ZONING CODE, RE: SPECIAL PERMIT IN R1-WF- Page 1 of 3 SEAF2019 Packet Pg. 71 6.a

5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations?

b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan?

6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant characterof the existingbuilt or natural landscape?

7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area?

If Yes, identify:

8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels?

b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action?

c. Are any pedestrianaccommodations or bicycle routes availableon or nearthe site ofthe proposed action?

If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies:

10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES

If No, describe method for providing potable water: D D

11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES

If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: D

12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district NO YES which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? D b. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency?

b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? D If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: Attachment: R1-WF-10 EAF Signed (2042 : PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331-115.1, ZONING CODE, RE: SPECIAL PERMIT IN R1-WF- Page2 of 3 Packet Pg. 72 6.a

14. Identifythe typical habitattypes that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: D Shoreline D Forest Q Agricultural/grasslands D Earlymid-successional D Wetland D Urban D Suburban

15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or NO YES Federal government as threatened or endangered?

16. Is the project site located in Ae 100-year flood plan? NO YES

17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? IfYes,

a. Will stonn water discharges flow to adjacent properties?

b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (mnoffand storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe:

18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES or other liquids (e. g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:

19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES management facility? If Yes, describe:

20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject ofremediation (ongoing or NO YES completed) for hazardouswaste? If Yes, describe:

I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATIONPROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/pame: ^-^ ik ^^>}J^e^\Q\ Date: l^& ^-0

Signature:re: ^' . ' Title: D. f^c^r^p^^^ $ -fc^o^ Attachment: R1-WF-10 EAF Signed (2042 : PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331-115.1, ZONING CODE, RE: SPECIAL PERMIT IN R1-WF- PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 73 6.a

Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project:

Date:

Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment

Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all ofthe followingquestions in Part 2 usingthe infonnationcontained in Part 1 and othermaterials submitted by theproject sponsoror otherwiseavailable to the reviewer. When answeringthe questions the reviewershould be guidedby the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?"

No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? D 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will theproposed actionimpair the characteror quality ofthe existingcommunity? D 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will theproposed actionresult in an adversechange in the existinglevel oftraffic or affect existinginfi^structure for mass transit, hiking or walkway? D 6. Will the proposed action causean increase in the use ofenergy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action inpact existing: a. public / private watersupplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed actioninpair the characteror quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e. g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)?

10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? D

PRINT FORM Page 1 of 2 Attachment: R1-WF-10 EAF Signed (2042 : PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331-115.1, ZONING CODE, RE: SPECIAL PERMIT IN R1-WF- SEAF2019 Packet Pg. 74 6.a AgencyUse Only [If applicable] Project: Date:

Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance

For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficientdetail, identifythe impact, includingany measures or designelements that have beenincluded by theproject sponsorto avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explainhow the leadagency determinedthat the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact shouldbe assessedconsidering its setting, probabilityof occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographicscope and magnitude. Also considerthe potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts.

The proposed amendment is a clarification to an earlier amendment made in 2016. This change will provide greater clarity regarding density for multifamily development, and as a result, will foster better site design, reducing potential impervious surfaces and providing better opportunities to maintain water views.

Checkthis boxif you have determined, basedon the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental inyact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.

City of New Rochelle - City C ncil 06/30/20 Name d Agency Date Luiz C. Aragon Commissioner of Development Print or TypeNam o ponsible Officerin LeadAgency Title ofresponsible Officer CA> Signature f ponsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature ofPreparer (if different from Responsible Officer)

PRINT FORM Page2 of 2 Attachment: R1-WF-10 EAF Signed (2042 : PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331-115.1, ZONING CODE, RE: SPECIAL PERMIT IN R1-WF-

Packet Pg. 75 6.b

0~ -jr- ..<. ^ ^^1

R1-WF-1

Urste < -

\^ F-10

KEY.MAP /s\. /

t N f

Legend Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENTP, NRCan, ^ J R1-WF-10 Zoning Boundary Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), Mapmylndia, NGCC,© OpenStreetMap contributors, and-the^GISUser Community

Data sources: Westehester County GIS City of Attachment: R1-WF-10 Map scan (2042 : PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331-115.1, ZONING CODE, RE: SPECIAL PERMIT IN »<^>-E New Rochelle DPW New Rochelle Rl- F-10 Zone 345 690 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable Packet Pg. 76 Feet for legal, engineering, or surveying purDoses. New York ADOPTED: 2020-80 July 14, 2020 7

City of New Rochelle Development

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Luiz Aragon, Development Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED PUBLIC HEARING RE: AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331- 115.1, ZONING CODE, RE: R1-WF-10 DISTRICT - Resolution directing Public Hearing relative to amending Section 331-115.1, Special Permit Uses in the R1-WF-10 District, of Chapter 331, Zoning, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle, and related map amendments.

PROPOSED PUBLIC HEARING RE: AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 331-115.1, ZONING CODE, RE: R1-WF-10 DISTRICT

Packet Pg. 77 ADOPTED: 2020-80 July 14, 2020 7

LEGISLATION RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO AMENDING SECTION 331-115.1, SPECIAL PERMIT USES IN THE R1-WF-10 DISTRICT, OF CHAPTER 331, ZONING, OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, AND RELATED MAP AMENDMENTS.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of New Rochelle that this City Council hold a public hearing on September 15, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 515 North Avenue, New Rochelle, New York relative to amending Section 331-115.1, Special Permit Uses in the R1-WF-10 District, of Chapter 331, Zoning, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle, and related map amendments; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish notice of such public hearing in the official newspaper of the City of New Rochelle at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing date.

Packet Pg. 78 8

City of New Rochelle Finance Department

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Mark Zulli, Finance Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SELL THREE PARCELS ACQUIRED THROUGH AN IN REM FORECLOSURE JUDGMENT - Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sell three parcels acquired through in rem foreclosure via public auction.

Background: The Finance Department goes to great lengths to work with property owners who fall behind on property tax payments. However, in some cases a resolution can not be achieved. At that point an in rem proceeding must be filed with the Supreme Court as required by NYS Property Tax Law.

Our department had made every effort to assist the owner of the three parcels listed below who had open property taxes going back over 8 years. On February 09, 2020 the City of New Rochelle applied to the Supreme Court of the State of New York for an in-rem foreclosure judgment. On February 27, 2020, the City was granted judgment of foreclosure of tax liens upon default pursuant to Real Property Tax Law 1136 and was also granted permission to file a deed in the Westchester County Clerk’s office conveying all parcels listed below to the City of New Rochelle.

Block & Lot 0930-0028 Vacant Residential Substandard Land Block & Lot 0998-0038 Improved Residential Block & Lot 1227-0017 Improved Residential

Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the Fiance Department that authorization be given to the City Manager to sell, via public auction, the aforementioned surplus residential properties for no less than the taxes owed plus any costs or improvements and to execute the closing of said properties.

Packet Pg. 79 8

LEGISLATION RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SELL THREE PARCELS ACQUIRED THROUGH IN REM FORECLOSURE VIA PUBLIC AUCTION.

WHEREAS, the Finance Department goes to great lengths to work with property owners who fall behind on property tax payments; and

WHEREAS, in some cases a resolution cannot be achieved and in rem foreclosure proceeding must be filed with the Supreme Court as required by New York State Property Tax Law; and

WHEREAS, every effort has been made to assist the owners of the three parcels listed below who had open property taxes going back over 8 years; and

WHEREAS, on February 9, 2020 the City of New Rochelle applied to the Supreme Court of the State of New York for an in-rem foreclosure judgment and on February 27, 2020, the City was granted judgment of foreclosure of tax liens upon default pursuant to Real Property Tax Law 1136 and was also granted permission to file a deed in the Westchester County Clerk’s office conveying all parcels listed below to the City of New Rochelle:

Block & Lot 0930-0028 Vacant Residential Substandard Land Block & Lot 0998-0038 Improved Residential Block & Lot 1227-0017 Improved Residential

Now, therefore

BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Manager is hereby authorized to sell the aforementioned surplus residential properties via public auction for no less than the taxes owed plus any costs or improvements and to execute the closing of said properties.

Packet Pg. 80 9

City of New Rochelle Finance Department

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Mark Zulli, Finance Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: SALES AND COMPENSATING USE TAXES - PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, NEW YORK, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 102 OF MAY 4, 1976, IMPOSING SALES AND COMPENSATING USE TAXES, AS AMENDED, TO INCREASE THE RATE OF SALES AND COMPENSATING USE TAX FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2021 AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2023

Background : Legislation was introduced in both the NYS Assembly (A7521) and Senate (S7521) relating to an extension of the authorization of the City of New Rochelle to impose an additional sales and compensating use tax. Subsequently, the bill was incorporated into the Governor's budget and signed into law on April 3,2020.

Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution extending the sales and compensating use tax for the period January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2023.

Packet Pg. 81 9

LEGISLATION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, NEW YORK, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 102 OF MAY 4, 1976, IMPOSING SALES AND COMPENSATING USE TAXES, AS AMENDED, TO INCREASE THE RATE OF THE SALES AND COMPENSATING USE TAXES FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2021, AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2023.

WHEREAS, the New York State Legislature enacted legislation which became Chapter 58 of the Laws of 2020, amending the Tax Law and extending until December 31, 2023, the authority of the City of New Rochelle to impose additional sales and use taxes; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of New Rochelle:

SECTION 1. The first sentence of Section two of Resolution No. 102 of May 4, 1976, as amended, is amended to read as follows:

Section 2. Imposition of sales tax.

On and after September 1, 1976, there is hereby imposed and there shall be paid a tax of two percent upon, and for the period commencing September 1, 1993, and ending December 31, 2023, there is hereby imposed and there shall be paid an additional tax of one percent upon:

SECTION 2. Section 2-B of Resolution No. 102 of May 4, 1976, as amended, is amended to read as follows:

Section 2-B. Exemption of certain energy sources and related services from additional one percent rate of tax.

Notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of this resolution, receipts from the sale of property and services described in Section 2-A of this resolution and consideration given or contracted to be given for such property and services shall be exempt from the additional one percent rate of sales and compensating use taxes imposed by Sections 2 and 4, respectively, of this resolution for the period commencing September 1, 1993, and ending December 31, 2023.

Packet Pg. 82 9

SECTION 3. Subdivision (f) of Section three of Resolution No. 102 of May 4, 1976, as amended, is amended to read as follows:

(f) With respect to the additional tax of one percent imposed for the period commencing September 1, 1993, and ending December 31, 2023, the provisions of subdivisions (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of this section apply, except that for the purposes of this subdivision, all references in said subdivisions (a), (b), (c) and (d) to an effective date shall be read as referring to September 1, 1993, all references in said subdivision (a) to the date four months prior to the effective date shall be read as referring to May 1, 1993, and the reference in subdivision (b) to the date immediately preceding the effective date shall be read as referring to August 31, 1993. Nothing herein shall be deemed to exempt from tax at the rate in effect prior to September 1, 1993, any transaction which may not be subject to the additional tax imposed effective on that date.

SECTION 4. Section four of Resolution No. 102 of May 4, 1976, as amended, is amended to read as follows:

Section 4. Imposition of compensating use tax.

(a) Except to the extent that property or services have already been or will be subject to the sales tax under this enactment, there is hereby imposed on every person a use tax for the use within this taxing jurisdiction on and after September 1, 1993, except as otherwise exempted under this enactment, (A) of any tangible personal property purchased at retail, (B) of any tangible personal property (other than computer software used by the author or other creator) manufactured, processed or assembled by the user, (i) if items of the same kind of tangible personal property are offered for sale by him in the regular course of business or (ii) if items are used as such or incorporated into a structure, building or real property, by a contractor, subcontractor or repairman in erecting structures or buildings, or building on, or otherwise adding to, altering, improving, maintaining, servicing or repairing real property, property or land, as the terms real property, property or land are defined in the real property tax law, if items of the same kind are not offered for sale as such by such contractor, subcontractor or repairman or other user in the regular course of business, (C) of any of the services described in paragraphs (1), (7) and (8) of subdivision (c) of section two, (D) of any tangible personal property, however acquired, where not acquired for purposes of resale, upon which any of the services described under paragraphs (2), (3) and (7) of subdivision (c) of Section two have been performed, (E) of any telephone answering service described in subdivision (b) of Section two and (F) of any computer software written or otherwise created by the user if the user offers software of a similar kind for sale as such or as a component part of other property in the regular course of business.

Packet Pg. 83 9

(b) For purposes of clause (A) of subdivision (a) of this section, for the period commencing September 1, 1993, and ending December 31, 2023, the tax shall be at the rate of three percent, and on and after January 1, 2024, the tax shall be at the rate of two percent, of the consideration given or contracted to be given for such property, or for the use of such property, including any charges for shipping or delivery as described in paragraph three of subdivision (b) of Section one, but excluding any credit for tangible personal property accepted in part payment and intended for resale.

(c) For purposes of subclause (i) of clause (B) of subdivision (a) of this section, for the period commencing September 1, 1993, and ending December 31, 2023, the tax shall be at the rate of three percent, and on and after January 1, 2024, the tax shall be at the rate of two percent, of the price at which items of the same kind of tangible personal property are offered for sale by the user, and the mere storage, keeping, retention or withdrawal from storage of tangible personal property by the person who manufactured, processed or assembled such property shall not be deemed a taxable use by him.

(d) For purposes of subclause (ii) of clause (B) of subdivision (a) of this section, for the period commencing September 1, 1993, and ending December 31, 2023, the tax shall be at the rate of three percent, and on and after January 1, 2024, the tax shall be at the rate of two percent, of the consideration given or contracted to be given for the tangible personal property manufactured, processed or assembled into the tangible personal property the use of which is subject to tax, including any charges for shipping or delivery as described in paragraph three of subdivision (b) of Section one.

(e) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, for purposes of clause (B) of subdivision (a) of this section, there shall be no tax on any portion of such price which represents the value added by the user to tangible personal property which he fabricates and installs to the specifications of an addition or capital improvement to real property, property or land, as the terms real property, property or land are defined in the real property tax law, over and above the prevailing normal purchase price prior to such fabrication of such tangible personal property which a manufacturer, producer or assembler would charge an unrelated contractor who similarly fabricated and installed such tangible personal property to the specifications of an addition or capital improvement to such real property, property or land.

(f) For purposes of clauses (C), (D) and (E) of subdivision (a) of this section, for the period commencing September 1, 1993, and ending December 31, 2023, the tax shall be at the rate of three percent, and on and after January 1, 2024, the tax shall be

Packet Pg. 84 9

at the rate of two percent, of the consideration given or contracted to be given for the service, including the consideration for any tangible personal property transferred in conjunction with the performance of the service and also including any charges for shipping and delivery of the property so transferred and of the tangible personal property upon which the service was performed as such charges are described in paragraph three of subdivision (b) of Section one.

(g) For purposes of clause (F) of subdivision (a) of this section, for the period commencing September 1, 1993, and ending December 31, 2023, the tax shall be at the rate of three percent, and on and after January 1, 2024, the tax shall be at the rate of two percent, of the consideration given or contracted to be given for the tangible personal property which constitutes the blank medium, such as disks or tapes, used in conjunction with software, or for the use of such property, and the mere storage, keeping, retention or withdrawal from storage of computer software described in such clause (F) by its author or other creator shall not be deemed a taxable use by such person.

SECTION 5. Paragraph (C) of subdivision one of Section eleven of Resolution No. 102 of May 4, 1976, as amended, is amended to read as follows:

(C) With respect to the additional tax of one percent imposed for the period beginning September 1, 1993, and ending December 31, 2023, in respect to the use of property used by the purchaser in this County prior to September 1, 1993.

SECTION 6. This enactment shall take effect on January 1, 2021.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. A9774 2. S7521

Packet Pg. 85 9.a

STATE OF NEW YORK ______

9774 IN ASSEMBLY

February 11, 2020 ______

Introduced by M. of A. OTIS, PAULIN -- read once and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

AN ACT to amend the tax law, in relation to extending the authorization of the city of New Rochelle to impose an additional sales and compensating use tax

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows:

1 Section 1. Clause 4 of subparagraph (ii) of the opening paragraph of 2 section 1210 of the tax law, as amended by section 1 of subpart DDD of 3 part A of chapter 61 of the laws of 2017, is amended to read as follows: 4 (4) the city of New Rochelle is hereby further authorized and 5 empowered to adopt and amend local laws, ordinances or resolutions 6 imposing such taxes at a rate which is one percent additional to the 7 three percent rate authorized above in this paragraph for such city for 8 the period beginning September first, nineteen hundred ninety-three and 9 ending December thirty-first, two thousand [twenty] twenty-three; 10 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD14841-01-0 Attachment: A9774 (2053 : SALES AND COMPENSATING USE TAX)

Packet Pg. 86 9.b

STATE OF NEW YORK ______

7521 IN SENATE

January 23, 2020 ______

Introduced by Sen. STEWART-COUSINS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Government Operations

AN ACT to amend the tax law, in relation to extending the authorization of the city of New Rochelle to impose an additional sales and compensating use tax

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows:

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD14841-01-0 Attachment: S7521 (2053 : SALES AND COMPENSATING USE TAX)

Packet Pg. 87 10

City of New Rochelle Public Works

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Scott Pickup, Public Works Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED AWARD OF PAVEMENT ENHANCEMENTS PROJECT 20-012 - Resolution accepting the lowest responsible bid of ELQ Industries, Inc. relative to pavement enhancements (Project No. 20-012).

PROPOSED AWARD OF BID FOR PAVEMENT ENHACEMENTS: Resolution Accepting the Lowest Dollar Bid from ELQ Industries, Inc.

ORIGINATOR: Department of Public Works

SUMMARY DESCRIPTION: Pavement Enhancements, Project No. 20-012

This work involves the milling and paving of existing deteriorated stamped asphalt pavement and the installation of new thermoplastic brick pattern markings and crosswalks at three different locations along North Avenue. Locations are listed below:

Location 1: Intersection of North Avenue and Summit Avenue (Iona College) Location 2: 515 North Avenue (City Hall) Location 3: 475 North Avenue (Police)

RESULTS OF BIDS: Bids for the above Project were received at 12:00 Noon on June 3, 2020. Below is a summary of the bid results:

POSITION CONTRACTOR BASE BID TOTAL1 1 Coppola Paving2 $225,590.00 2 ELQ Industries $404,867.50 3 Yonkers Paving $409,698.15

1 No alternates were included in the Bid. 2 Coppola Paving withdrew their bid and claimed a “clerical error” on the bid value (refer to attached withdrawal letter).

Packet Pg. 88 10

CONSTRAINTS & CONSULTANTS: The time for completion is 30 calendar days from the Notice to Proceed.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

The Department of Public Works recommends awarding this project to the lowest responsible bidder, ELQ Industries, at their total bid price of $404,867.50

TOTAL CONTRACT COST & FUNDING REQUIRED:

Location 1 (Iona): $165,699 Location 2 (City Hall): $138,084 Location 3 (Police): $101,084.50 Total All Locations: $404,867.50

Locations 2 and 3 are the main priority at $239,168.50

FUNDING Funds in the amount of $310,000 are available from account 1490H-20150-2262.

Available funds are sufficient for completion of Locations 2 and 3. Completion of Location 1 will depend on Iona’s funding contribution to the project.

Packet Pg. 89 10

LEGISLATION RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BID OF ELQ INDUSTRIES, INC. RELATIVE TO PAVEMENT ENHANCEMENTS (PROJECT NO. 20-012).

WHEREAS, This work involves the milling and paving of existing deteriorated stamped asphalt pavement and the installation of new thermoplastic brick pattern markings and crosswalks at three different locations along North Avenue, as follows:

Location 1: Intersection of North Avenue and Summit Avenue (Iona College) Location 2: 515 North Avenue (City Hall) Location 3: 475 North Avenue (Police) and

WHEREAS, competitive bids were solicited for this Project; and

WHEREAS, three (3) contractors submitted bids, as follows:

POSITION CONTRACTOR BASE BID TOTAL¹

1 Coppola Paving² $225,590.00 2 ELQ Industries, Inc. $404,867.50 3 Yonkers Paving $409,698.15

¹No alternates were included in the Bid. ²Coppola Paving withdrew their bid and claimed a “clerical error” on the bid value (withdrawal letter provided) and

WHEREAS, the Department of Public Works has recommended the award of this Project to the lowest responsible bidder, ELQ Industries, Inc., at their total bid price of $404,867.50; now, therefore

BE IT RESOLVED by the City of New Rochelle, as follows:

Packet Pg. 90 10

1. The lowest responsible bid of ELQ Industries, Inc., to perform work on the Project, at their total bid price of $404,867.50 is hereby accepted subject to the execution of the appropriate contractual documents and submission of the required surety bonds which the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute.

2. Total contract cost and funding required is as follows:

Location 1 (Iona): $165,699.00 Location 2 (City Hall) $138,084.00 Location 3 (Police) $101,084.50 Total, 3 locations: $404,867.50 (Locations 2 and 3 are the main priority at $239,168.50).

3. Funds in the amount of $310,000 are available in Account No. 1490H-20150-2262. Available funds are sufficient for completion of Locations 2 and 3. Completion of Location 1 is subject to Iona’s funding contribution to the Project.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. New Rochelle North Avenue Pacing Improvements Letter of Formal Withdrawa...

Packet Pg. 91 10.a Attachment: New Rochelle North Avenue Pacing Improvements Letter of Formal Withdrawa... (2046 : PROPOSED AWARD OF PAVEMENT

Packet Pg. 92 11

City of New Rochelle Public Works

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Scott Pickup, Public Works Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE RE: PARKING REGULATION CHANGE - VICTORY BOULEVARD - Ordinance amending Section 312-83, Schedule XII: Parking Prohibited at all Times, of Chapter 312, Vehicles and Traffic, of the Code of the City of New Rochelle (Victory Boulevard).

NRPD has identified several locations along Victory Blvd where parked vehicles have been resulting in unsafe conditions due to the curvature of the street and vehicles parking too close to the Stop sign. Vehicles are crossing the double yellow lines to maneuver around them. Parking restriction signs are currently in place from Mildred Parkway to #90 Victory Boulevard. This restriction would be extended approximately 300 feet to Van Meter Fenway. Parking restrictions are also proposed around the curved section of Victory Blvd from #324 to Hanson Lane. The following changes to the Municipal code are recommended: (Matter underlined added)

§ 312-83 Schedule XII: Parking Prohibited at All Times. In accordance with the provisions of § 312-39, no person shall park a vehicle at any time upon any of the following described streets or parts of streets: Name of Street Side Location Victory Blvd West From Mildred Parkway to Van Meter Fenway Victory Blvd Both From #324 to Hanson Lane

Packet Pg. 93 11

LEGISLATION ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 312-83, SCHEDULE XII: PARKING PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES, OF CHAPTER 312, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE (VICTORY BOULEVARD).

BE IT ORDAINED by the City of New Rochelle:

Section 1. The Code of the City of New Rochelle, Section 312-83, Schedule XII: Parking Prohibited at All Times, of Chapter 312, Vehicles and Traffic, is hereby amended as follows:

§ 312-83. Schedule XII: Parking Prohibited at All Times.

In accordance with the provisions of § 312-39, no person shall park a vehicle at any time upon any of the following described streets or parts of streets:

Name of Street Side Location

Victory Boulevard West From Mildred Parkway to Van Meter Fenway Victory Boulevard Both From #324 to Hanson Lane

Matter underlined added.

Packet Pg. 94 12

City of New Rochelle Public Works

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Scott Pickup, Public Works Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED AWARD OF STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 19- 024B - Resolution accepting the lowest dollar bid of Verde Electric Maintenance Corp. relative to street lighting improvements and repairs at various locations (Project No. 19-024B).

PROPOSED AWARD OF BID FOR STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS: Resolution Accepting the Lowest Dollar Bid From Verde Electric Maintenance Corp. Relative to Street Lighting Improvements and Repair at Various Locations.

ORIGINATOR: Department of Public Works

SUMMARY DESCRIPTION: Street Lighting Improvements and Repair at Various Locations, Project No. 19-024B.

This work involves the repair of lighting fixtures and underground cables and at multiple locations to improve pedestrian and motorist safety as listed below: 1. North Avenue at Summit Avenue- Repair underground cables and remove temporary overhead street light wiring. 2. North Avenue at Lockwood Avenue- Repair underground cables and remove temporary overhead street light wiring. 3. North Avenue at Anderson Street- Repair underground cables and remove temporary overhead street light wiring. 4. Memorial Highway over North Avenue- Repair underground cables and remove temporary overhead street light wiring. Restore multiple non-functioning street lights. 5. Cedar Street under Metro North Railroad- Install new LED light fixtures under bridge with new Con Ed feeds to replace non-functioning MNRR light fixtures. 6. Palmer Avenue at River Street- Repair underground cables and restore two non- functioning street lights.

Add Alt. 1 will be needed if field conditions require additional conduit replacement. Add Alt. 2 has been requested by the Department of Development to repair lighting adjacent to the ITC.

Packet Pg. 95 12

RESULTS OF BIDS: Bids for the above Project were received at 12:00 Noon on June 10, 2020. One (1) contractor submitted a valid bid as follows:

POSITION CONTRACTORS TOTAL BID 1. Verde Electric Maintenance Corp.- Base Bid $289,001.45 Add Alt 1 $ 19,660.30 Add Alt 2 $119,353.68 Total $428,015.43

CONSTRAINTS & CONSULTANTS: The time for completion is 120 calendar days from the Notice to Proceed.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

The Department of Public Works and the Department of Developmentrecommends approval and awarding this project to the low bidder, Verde Electric Maintenance Corp., at their total bid price of $428,015.43. Quantities may be increased based upon unit bid pricing and when budgetary appropriation allows for such increase.

TOTAL CONTRACT COST & FUNDING REQUIRED:

Base Bid plus Add-Alt 1 and Add-Alt 2 $ 428,015.43 If necessary and if additional Funding is available, contract items may be increased not to exceed 30% of the Base Bid amount ($128,404.63)

FUNDING Funds are available from the following Accounts:

1490H-20000-2498 $ 305,407.23 3310-20180 $ 3,254.52 5640ET.20000 $ 119,353.68

TOTAL = $ 428,015.43

Packet Pg. 96 12

LEGISLATION RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOWEST DOLLAR BID OF VERDE ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE CORP. RELATIVE TO STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS AND REPAIRS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS (PROJECT NO. 19-024B).

WHEREAS, this project involves the repair of lighting fixtures and underground cables and at multiple locations to improve pedestrian and motorist safety as follows:

1. North Avenue at Summit Avenue: Repair underground cables and remove temporary overhead street light wiring.

2. North Avenue at Lockwood Avenue: Repair underground cables and remove temporary overhead street light wiring.

3. North Avenue at Anderson Street: Repair underground cables and remove temporary overhead street light wiring.

4. Memorial Highway over North Avenue: Repair underground cables and remove temporary overhead street light wiring. Restore multiple non-functioning street lights.

5. Cedar Street under Metro North Railroad: Install new LED light fixtures under bridge with new Con Ed feeds to replace non-functioning MNRR light fixtures.

6. Palmer Avenue at River Street: Repair underground cables and restore two non- functioning street lights.

Add Alt. 1 will be needed if field conditions require additional conduit replacement. Add Alt. 2 has been requested by the Department of Development to repair lighting adjacent to the ITC; and

WHEREAS, competitive bids were solicited for this project; and

WHEREAS, one (1) contractor submitted a valid bid, as follows:

POSITION CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID

1 Verde Electric Maintenance Corp. Base Bid $289,001.45

Packet Pg. 97 12

Add Alt. 1 $ 19,660.30 Add Alt. 2 $119,353.68 Total: $428,015.43 and

WHEREAS, the Department of Public Works and the Department of Development have recommended the award of this Project to the lowest dollar bidder, Verde Electric Maintenance Corp., to perform work on the Project at its bid price of $428,015.43 (quantities may be increased based upon unit bid pricing and when budgetary appropriation allows for such increase); now, therefore

BE IT RESOLVED by the City of New Rochelle, as follows:

1. The lowest dollar bid of Verde Electric Maintenance Corp., to perform work on the Project at its bid price of $428,015.43 is hereby accepted subject to the execution of the appropriate contractual documents and submission of the required surety bonds which the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute.

2. If necessary and if additional funding is available, contract items may be increased not to exceed 30% of the Base Bid amount ($128,404.63).

3. Funding for this Project is available in the following accounts:

1490H-20000-2498 $305,407.23 3310-20180 $ 3,254.52 5640ET.20000 $119,353.68 $428,015.43

Packet Pg. 98 13

City of New Rochelle Public Works

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Scott Pickup, Public Works Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED AWARD OF BID RE: 2020 STREET RESURFACING OF VARIOUS STREETS - Resolution accepting the lowest dollar bid of ELQ Industries, Inc. relative to resurfacing of various streets for 2020.

SUMMARY DESCRIPTION: This road improvement project includes street surface milling, crack/sealing, asphalt resurfacing, adjusting casting, incidental drainage improvements, ADA ramps etc., with associated work at various locations. This project is funded with State Aid and City funds.

The road improvement project includes working with neighboring municipalities, which agreed to join CNR in its bid by Intermunicipal Agreement. The municipalities are the Village of Pelham, and Village of Pelham Manor. Each municipality will pay the vendor directly for their share of the award.

RESULTS OF BIDS: Bids for the above project were received at 12:00 P.M. on June 3, 2020. Five (5) contractors obtained plans and specifications and five (5) contractors submitted valid bids for all three municipalities, including alternates. The bid price was based on estimated quantities for comparison purposes. Quantities may be increased/decreased up to 30% at per ton rates if appropriations are available.

EXCEEDS LOW BY POSITION CONTRACTOR BID TOTAL $ % 1 ELQ Industries, Corp. $2,139,225.00 ------2 PCI Industries, Corp. $2,454,150.00 $314,925.00 15.0% 3 Montesano Brothers, Inc. $2,573,225.00 $434,000.00 20.3% 4 Grace Industries, LLC $2,866,500.00 $727,275.00 34.0% 5 Coppola Paving $3,782,495.00 $1,643,270.00 77.0%

FUNDING

Packet Pg. 99 13

The Department of Transportation notified the City that funding of $1,133,715.52 for the Consolidated Local Street and Highway Improvement Program (CHIPS), $258,781.85 for PaveNY and $149,708.90 for Extreme Winter Recovery is available for the State Fiscal Year of 2020. This state funding is in addition to the $1,000,000.00 city funding. This award amount can be increased or decreased based on available funding..

RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Public Works recommends awarding this project to ELQ Industries Inc., the lowest responsible bidder. Quantities may be increased/decreased at per ton rates if appropriations are available.

CNR BID AMOUNT Budget Account Street Resurfacing-Base Bid (CHIPS) $1,133,715.52 1490H-20150-2519

Street Resurfacing -Base Bid (Winter Recovery) $ 149,708.90 1490H-20150-2518 Street Resurfacing -Base Bid (PAVE NY) $ 258,781.90 1490H-20150-2518 Street Resurfacing -Base bid (BAN) $ 597,018.68 1490H-20150-2519 CNR Total Award $ 2,139,225.00

Packet Pg. 100 13

LEGISLATION RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOWEST DOLLAR BID OF ELQ INDUSTRIES, INC. RELATIVE TO RESURFACING OF VARIOUS STREETS FOR 2020.

WHEREAS, this project includes street surface milling, crack sealing, asphalt resurfacing, adjusting casting, incidental drainage improvements, ADA ramps, etc., with associated work at various locations; and

WHEREAS, this project is funded with State aid and City funds; and

WHEREAS, this road improvement project includes working with neighboring municipalities the Village of Pelham and the Village of Pelham Manor, all of which have agreed to join the City in its bid via Intermunicipal Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the bid price was based on estimated quantities for comparison purposes, and quantities may be increased/decreased up to 30 percent at per-ton rates if appropriations are available; and

WHEREAS, competitive bids were solicited for this project; and

WHEREAS, five (5) contractors obtained plans and specifications and five (5) contractors submitted valid bids, as follows: EXCEEDS LOW BY POSITION CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID $ %

Low ELQ Industries Corp. $2,139,225 ------2 PCI Industries, Inc. $2,454,150 $ 314,925 15% 3 Montesano Brothers, Inc. $2,573,225 $ 434,000 20.3% 4 Grace Industries, LLC $2,866,500 $ 727,275 34% 5 Coppola Paving $3,782,495 $ 1,643,270 77% and

WHEREAS, the Department of Public Works has recommended the award of this Project to the lowest dollar bidder, ELQ Industries, Inc., to perform work on the Project at its bid price of $2,139,225; now, therefore

Packet Pg. 101 13

BE IT RESOLVED by the City of New Rochelle, as follows:

1. The lowest dollar bid of ELQ Industries to perform work on the Project at its bid price of $2,139,225 is hereby accepted subject to the execution of the appropriate contractual documents and submission of the required surety bonds which the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute.

2. The Department of Transportation notified the City that funding of $1,133,715.52 for the Consolidated Local Street and Highway Improvement Program (CHIPS), $258,781.85 for PaveNY and $149,708.90 for Extreme Winter Recovery is available for the State fiscal year of 2020, which is in addition to the $1,000,000 City funding. This award amount may be increased or decreased based on available funding.

3. Funding for this Project is available in the following accounts:

BUDGET CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE BID AMOUNT ACCOUNT

Street Resurfacing-Base Bid (CHIPS) $1,133,715.52 1490H-20150-2519 Street Resurfacing-Base Bid (Winter Recovery) $ 149,708.90 1490H-20150-2518 Street Resurfacing-Base Bid (PaveNY) $ 258,781.90 1490H-20150-2518 Street Resurfacing-Base Bid (BAN) $ 597,018.68 1490H-20150-2519

City of New Rochelle total award: $2,139,225.00

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resoultion - City Wide Resurfacing 2020

Packet Pg. 102 13.a

PROPOSED AWARD OF BID FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOWEST DOLLAR BID FROM ELQ INDUSTRIES, CORP RELATIVE TO THE ANNUAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, THE BUDGET OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE FOR 2020, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR.

FUNDING The Department of Transportation notified the City that funding of $1,133,715.52 for the Consolidated Local Street and Highway Improvement Program (CHIPS), $258,781.85 for PaveNY and $149,708.90 for Extreme Winter Recovery is available for the State Fiscal Year of 2020. This state funding is in addition to the $1,000,000.00 city funding. This award amount can be increased or decreased based on available funding..

Attachment: Resoultion - City Wide Resurfacing 2020 (2039 : PROPOSED AWARD OF BID FOR STREET RESURFACING VARIOUS CNR BID AMOUNT Budget Account

Packet Pg. 103 13.a Street Resurfacing-Base Bid (CHIPS) $1,133,715.52 1490H-20150-2519

Street Resurfacing –Base Bid (Winter Recovery) $ 149,708.90 1490H-20150-2518 Street Resurfacing –Base Bid (PAVE NY) $ 258,781.90 1490H-20150-2518 Street Resurfacing -Base bid (BAN) $ 597,018.68 1490H-20150-2519 CNR Total Award $ 2,139,225.00

Attachment: Resoultion - City Wide Resurfacing 2020 (2039 : PROPOSED AWARD OF BID FOR STREET RESURFACING VARIOUS

Packet Pg. 104 ADOPTED: 2020-81 July 14, 2020 14

City of New Rochelle Public Works

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Scott Pickup, Public Works Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE RE: TRAFFIC REGULATION CHANGE - KINGS HIGHWAY AND SYCAMORE AVENUE - Ordinance amending Section 312-79 (Schedule VIII: Stop Intersections) of Chapter 312 (Vehicles & Traffic) of the Code of the City of New Rochelle (Kings Highway and Sycamore Avenue).

Following complete failure of the signal equipment at the intersection of Kings Highway and Sycamore Avenue in 2018, the City Council authorized funding to replace the traffic signal, requiring new supports and ADA compliance. In the interim, Stop signs were put in place to control traffic in all three directions. These signs were added to the municipal code to accommodate enforcement measures. The replacement signal was commissioned on June 3, 2020, and Stop signs were removed, therefore it is recommended to remove them from the municipal code as follows: (matter in brackets deleted)

312-79 Schedule VIII: Stop Intersections. In accordance with the provisions of § 312-34, the following described intersections are hereby designated as stop intersections, and stop signs shall be installed as follows: Stop Sign on Direction of Travel At Intersection of * 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., school days only.

[Kings Highway] [Both] [Sycamore Avenue] [Sycamore Avenue] [North] [Kings Highway]

Packet Pg. 105 ADOPTED: 2020-81 July 14, 2020 14

LEGISLATION ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 312-79 (SCHEDULE VIII: STOP INTERSECTIONS) OF CHAPTER 312 (VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC) OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE (KINGS HIGHWAY AND SYCAMORE AVENUE).

BE IT ORDAINED by the City of New Rochelle:

The Code of the City of New Rochelle, Section 312-79 (Schedule VIII: Stop Intersections) of Chapter 312 (Vehicles and Traffic) is hereby amended as follows:

§312-79. Schedule VIII: Stop Intersections.

In accordance with the provisions of §312-34, the following described intersections are hereby designated as stop intersections, and stop signs shall be installed as follows:

Stop Sign on Direction of Travel At Intersection of

[Kings Highway] [Both] [Sycamore Avenue] [Sycamore Avenue] [North] [Kings Highway]

Matter [bracketed] deleted.

Packet Pg. 106 ADOPTED: 2020-82 July 14, 2020 15

City of New Rochelle Parks & Recreation

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: William Zimmermann, Parks & Rec Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED ACCEPTANCE OF GIFT FROM FRIENDS OF NEW ROCHELLE PARKS - Resolution authorizing the City Manager to accept the gift of a 2014 NV Passenger Van from Nissan of New Rochelle for the Friends of New Rochelle Parks on behalf of the Parks and Recreation Department.

Nissan of New Rochelle has donated a pre-owned 2014 NV Passenger Van to the Friends of New Rochelle Parks with a book value of $12,000.00. Therefore, we are requesting City Council authorize the City Manager to accept this gift on behalf of the Parks and Recreation Department.

Packet Pg. 107 ADOPTED: 2020-82 July 14, 2020 15

LEGISLATION RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANGER TO ACCEPT THE GIFT OF A 2014 NV PASSENGER VAN FROM NISSAN OF NEW ROCHELLE FOR THE FRIENDS OF NEW ROCHELLE PARKS ON BEHALF OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT.

WHEREAS, Nissan of New Rochelle has donated a pre-owned 2014 NV Passenger Van to the Friends of New Rochelle Parks with a book value of $12,000; now, therefore

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of New Rochelle, that the City Manager is hereby authorized to accept the gift of a 2014 NV Passenger Van from Nissan of New Rochelle for the Friends of New Rochelle Parks on behalf of the Parks and Recreation Department.

Packet Pg. 108 16

City of New Rochelle Police Department

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Joseph Schaller, Police Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FROM BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20 CORONAVIRUS SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING PROGRAM, PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO 2020 BUDGET - Ordinance accepting the U.S. Department of Justice, BJA FY 20 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program Grant in the amount of $45,242.00, and amending Ordinance No. 270 of 2019, the Budget of the City of New Rochelle for 2020 (Police Department).

THE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, HAS EARMARKED $45,243.00 FOR THE NEW ROCHELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT THROUGH THE “BJA FY 20 CORONAVIRUS EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING PROGRAM” GRANT. THERE IS NO MATCH REQUIRED. I INTEND TO USE THE FUNDS FOR GRANT APPROVED TECHNOLOGY ENHANCEMENTS, SANITIZING EQUIPMENT AND PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT.

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT COUNCIL ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE THIS FUNDING FOR THIS PURPOSE.

INCREASE ESTIMATED REVENUES - GENERAL FUND:

3128-4389-2706 FEDERAL GRANT - $45,243.00

INCREASE APPROPRIATIONS: - GENERAL FUND:

3128-27000-2706 FEDERAL GRANT - $45,243.00

Packet Pg. 109 16

LEGISLATION ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BJA FY 20 CORONAVIRUS EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING PROGRAM GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,243.00, AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 270 OF 2019, THE BUDGET OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE FOR 2020 (POLICE DEPARTMENT).

BE IT ORDAINED by the City of New Rochelle:

Section 1. The Council of the City of New Rochelle hereby accepts the U.S. Department of Justice, BJA FY 20 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program Grant in the amount of $45,243.00.

Section 2. Ordinance No. 270 of 2019, the Budget of the City of New Rochelle for 2020, is hereby amended in order to provide for the acceptance and implementation of this grant, as follows:

Increase Estimated Revenues-General Fund:

3128-4389-2706 Federal Grant $45,243.00

Increase Appropriations-General Fund:

3128-27000-2706 Federal Grant $45,243.00

Section 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute documentation as may be necessary and required to file and accept the $45,243.00 grant.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020

Packet Pg. 110 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 111 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 112 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 113 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 114 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 115 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 116 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 117 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 118 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 119 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 120 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 121 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 122 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 123 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 124 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 125 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 126 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 127 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 128 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 129 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 130 16.a Attachment: Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant_Hayes_06182020 (2040 : BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE CESFP 20

Packet Pg. 131 ADOPTED: 2020-83 July 14, 2020 17

City of New Rochelle City Manager

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Charles Strome III, City Manager DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: PROPOSED CREATION OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE - Resolution creating the African-American Advisory Committee. Sponsored by Mayor Noam Bramson and Council Member Yadira Ramos-Herbert

African-American Advisory Committee

Responsibilities • Recommend to the City Council and Administration actions, practices, and policies to address the concerns, needs, and interests of the black community of New Rochelle.

• Facilitate constructive two-way dialogue between New Rochelle’s black community and decision-makers in local government.

• Enhance equitable access of black residents to municipal services and information.

• Promote and initiate black entrepreneurship, economic opportunity, and business development in New Rochelle.

• Promote dialogue and mutual understanding among all of New Rochelle’s diverse constituencies.

Structure & Appointment Membership: Nine members, appointed by the City Manager, with at least five members associated with the following organizations and groups: the NAACP-New Rochelle Branch, the New Rochelle Municipal Housing Authority, the Remington Boys & Girls Club, NewROAR, and the Black Clergy of New Rochelle.

Leadership: Chair and Vice Chair, appointed by the City Manager, from among the membership.

Term: Appointments shall be for three-year terms.

Packet Pg. 132 ADOPTED: 2020-83 July 14, 2020 17

Considerations for Appointment: • meaningful leadership and/or advocacy experience;

• connection to relevant community organizations;

• demonstrated ability to work collaboratively;

• overall composition that is reflective of New Rochelle’s diverse black community, with respect to age, socio-economic status, life experience, and other relevant factors.

Packet Pg. 133 ADOPTED: 2020-83 July 14, 2020 17

LEGISLATION RESOLUTION CREATING THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of New Rochelle, that this City Council hereby establishes the African-American Advisory Committee as follows:

Responsibilities

• Recommend to the City Council and Administration actions, practices, and policies to address the concerns, needs, and interests of the black community of New Rochelle.

• Facilitate constructive two-way dialogue between New Rochelle’s black community and decision-makers in local government.

• Enhance equitable access of black residents to municipal services and information.

• Promote and initiate black entrepreneurship, economic opportunity, and business development in New Rochelle.

• Promote dialogue and mutual understanding among all of New Rochelle’s diverse constituencies.

Structure & Appointment

Membership: Nine members, appointed by the City Manager, with at least five members associated with the following organizations and groups: the NAACP-New Rochelle Branch, the New Rochelle Municipal Housing Authority, the Remington Boys & Girls Club, NewROAR, and the Black Clergy of New Rochelle.

Leadership: Chair and Vice Chair, appointed by the City Manager, from among the membership.

Term: Appointments shall be for three-year terms.

Considerations for Appointment:

• meaningful leadership and/or advocacy experience;

Packet Pg. 134 ADOPTED: 2020-83 July 14, 2020 17

• connection to relevant community organizations;

• demonstrated ability to work collaboratively;

• overall composition that is reflective of New Rochelle’s diverse black community, with respect to age, socio-economic status, life experience, and other relevant factors

Packet Pg. 135 18

City of New Rochelle Police Department

MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Charles B. Strome, III, City Manager FROM: Joseph Schaller, Police Commissioner DATE: July 14, 2020 SUBJECT: NEW ROCHELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT (NRPD) SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION ITEM

Packet Pg. 136 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 137 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 138 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 139 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 140 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 141 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 142 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 143 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 144 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 145 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 146 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 147 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 148 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 149 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 150 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 151 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 152 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 153 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 154 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 155 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 156 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 157 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 158 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 159 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 160 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 161 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 162 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 163 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 164 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 165 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 166 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 167 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 168 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 169 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 170 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 171 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 172 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 173 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 174 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 175 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 176 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 177 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 178 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 179 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 180 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 181 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 182 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 183 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 184 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 185 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 186 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 187 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 188 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 189 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 190 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 191 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 192 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 193 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 194 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 195 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 196 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 197 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 198 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 199 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 200 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 201 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 202 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 203 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 204 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 205 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 206 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 207 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 208 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 209 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 210 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 211 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 212 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 213 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 214 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 215 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 216 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 217 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 218 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 219 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 220 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 221 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 222 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 223 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 224 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 225 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 226 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 227 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 228 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 229 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 230 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 231 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 232 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 233 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 234 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 235 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 236 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 237 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 238 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 239 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 240 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 241 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 242 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 243 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 244 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 245 18.a Attachment: PRESENTATION Special Report Final copy-DPC Gazzola (2050 : NRPD SPECIAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL)

Packet Pg. 246