Hidden Rice Diversity in the Guianas
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Participatory Mapping in Lands of Indigenous Peoples and Maroons in Suriname
SUPPORT FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERIOR -COLLECTIVE RIGHTS PARTICIPATORY MAPPING IN LANDS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND MAROONS IN SURINAME FINAL SUMMARY REPORT December 2010 THE AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM Doekhieweg Oost 24, PARAMARIBO , SURINAME , PH: (597) 568606 FAX: (597) 6850169. EMAIL: [email protected] . WEB: WWW.ACT-SURINAME.ORG TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………. 6 2. METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………………………………… 9 3. COMMUNITY MAPPING PROCESS IN THE INTERIOR OF SURINAME.………………….. 14 3.1 THE INTERIOR AND ITS TRIBAL COMMUNITIES…………………………………………. 14 3.2 TRIBAL MAPPING PROCESSES…………………………………………………………….. 18 3.3 CHALLENGES IN THE COMMUNITY MAPPING PROCESS.…………………………….. 30 3.4 VERIFICATION OF FIELD DATA…………………………………………………………….. 32 3.5 GIS PROCESSING OF FIELD DATA INTO ONE MAP……………………………………… 33 REFERENCES…………….……………………………………………………………………………………… 35 ANNEX 1: ACT TRAINING MANUAL FOR GPS USE AND DATA TRANSFER….………….. 36 ANNEX 2: EXAMPLE OF COMMUNITY WORKSHOP RESULT…………………… …………. 37 ANNEX 3: ACT VERIFICATION MANUAL FOR COMMUNITY MAPPING………………….. 38 ANNEX 4: MAPPING EXPEDITIONS………………………………………………… …………. 39 ANNEX 5: VERIFICATION ROUNDS IN COMMUNITIES………………………………………. 40 ANNEX 6: COMMUNITY MAPPING PARTICIPANTS……………………………… …………. 41 ANNEX 7: TEAM OF CONSULTANTS…………………………………………………………… 47 ANNEX 8: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE ASSIGNMENT…………………………………. 48 ANNEX 9: MEMORANDUM ACT‐GLIS……………………………………………………… -
State of the Guianas Drivers and Pressures Towards Green Economies
REPORT GUIANASGUI 20201212 Living Guianas Report 2012 State of the Guianas Drivers and pressures Towards green economies Authors WWF Guianas: Dominiek Plouvier (editor in chief), Laurens Gomes Copernicus Institute: Pita Verweij, Nathalie Verlinden CONTENTS Contributors and reviewers WWF: Gerold Zondervan, Laurent Kelle, Patrick Williams, Monique Grooten, Natasja Oerlemans, Natascha Zwaal, Karin Spong PREFACE 3 Local consultants: Jewell Liddell and Donna Ramdial (Guyana), Audrey Guiraud (French Guiana), Gwendolyn Landburg and Sara Ramirez (Suriname). External reviewer: John Goedschalk (Suriname) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 WWF Guianas WWF has been active in the Guianas since the nineteen sixties, 1. LIVING GUIANAS – WHY WE SHOULD CARE? 7 starting with conservation work on Marine Turtles. The Guianas Introducing the Guianas 7 office opened since 1998. The Guianas and the Amazon Biome 8 WWF Guianas’ mission is to conserve the distinct natural Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services and people 10 communities, ecological phenomena and maintain viable Challenges and opportunities for green economies 11 populations of species of the Guianas in order to sustain important ecological processes and services, while supporting the region’s socio-economic development. 2. STATE OF THE GUIANAS: BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 13 WWF Biodiversity 13 WWF is one of the world’s largest, most experienced independent Forests 23 conservation organizations, with over 5 million supporters and a Rivers and other freshwater systems 29 global network active in more than 100 countries. Marine and coastal systems 33 WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by conserving the world’s biological diversity, ensuring 3. -
Land Rights, Tenure and Use of Indigenous Peoples and Maroons in Suriname
SUPPORT FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERIOR -COLLECTIVE RIGHTS LAND RIGHTS, TENURE AND USE OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND MAROONS IN SURINAME FINAL REPORT December 2010 THE AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM Doekhieweg Oost 24, PARAMARIBO, SURINAME, PH: (597) 568606 FAX: (597) 6850169. EMAIL: [email protected]. WEB: WWW.ACT-SURINAME.ORG TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS………………………………………………………………… 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………… 5 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………….. 7 1.1 SURINAME’S INTERIOR…………………………………………… 8 1.2 LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS…………………………. 10 1.3 FRAMEWORK FOR LAND AND RESOURCE USE……………….. 11 2. CUSTOMARY LAW ON LAND TENURE AND RESOURCE USE IN INDIGENOUS MAROON AREAS…………………………………………..…………….. 13 2.1 CUSTOMARY LAW ON LAND TENURE AND RESOURCE USE IN MAROON COMMUNITIES………………………………… 13 2.2 CUSTOMARY LAW ON LAND TENURE AND RESOURCE USE IN INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES ……………………………… 16 3. HISTORIC LAND USE OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND MAROONS IN SURINAME….19 3.1 BUILT UP LAND……………………………………………………… 19 3.2 FOREST USE…………………………………………………………. 22 3.3 AGRICULTURE……………………………………………………….. 25 3.4 GOLD AND BAUXITE MINING……………………………………. 29 3.5 LAND USED FOR PROTECTED AREAS AND FOR TOURISM…. 30 3.6 UNSUSTAINABLE LAND USE……………………………………… 32 4. RIGHTS TO LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES…………………………… 33 4.1 BACKGROUND TO THE PROBLEM……………………………….. 33 4.2 COMPETING CLAIMS FOR RESOURCE USE………………………. 35 4.3 CONFLICTS OVER LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES…………. 40 4.4 ACCESS TO RESOURCES AND LAND STEWARDSHIP..…………. 46 2 5. DEMARCATION OF LANDS……………………………………………………. 49 5.1 DEFINING DEMARCATION ………………………………………….. 49 5.2 DEMARCATION IN SURINAME……………………………………… 53 5.3 GUIDELINES TO DEMARCATION…………………………………... 62 6. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION ……………………………….… 67 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………………… 75 ANNEX 1: FORESTRY APPLICATION PROCESS……………………………… 81 ANNEX 2: CONSULTED STAKEHOLDERS……………………………………… 82 ANNEX 3: TEAM OF CONSULTANTS…………………………………………… 83 ANNEX 4: METHODOLOGY TO THE STUDY…………………………………. -
Agro-Ecological Zoning Suriname
AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONING SURINAME Paramaribo, March 24 2017 Contents LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... 3 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................. 4 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 5 2 TEAM .................................................................................................................................... 6 3 ADOPTED DATABASE........................................................................................................ 7 3.1 Demography ..................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Ecosystems ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Primary roads Infrastructure ........................................................................................... 9 3.4 Protected areas ............................................................................................................... 11 3.5 Geography ..................................................................................................................... 12 3.6 Hydrology ..................................................................................................................... -
Multi-Perspective Analysis of Drivers of Deforestation, Forest Degradation En
BACKGROUND STUDY FOR REDD+ IN SURINAME: MULTI-PERSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION, FOREST DEGRADATION AND BARRIERS TO REDD+ ACTIVITIES Strengthening national capacities of Suriname for the elaboration of the national REDD+ strategy and the design of its implementation framework Background study for REDD+ in Suriname: Multi-Perspective Analysis of Drivers of Deforestation, Forest Degradation and Barriers to REDD+ Activities Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the consultancy firm UNIQUE forestry and land use for the National Institute for Environment and Development in Suriname (NIMOS) and the Foundation for Forest Management and Production Control (SBB). The study benefits from collaboration between the consultant team and the staff at SBB, NIMOS and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). We extend our appreciation to all those who contributed their time and knowledge, especially those stakeholders who were consulted during the inception mission and leading up to the validation workshop (see annex 2) and in the national workshop on 8 December 2016. Please cite as follows: NIMOS, SBB and UNIQUE (2017). Background study for REDD+ in Suriname: Multi-perspective analysis of drivers of deforestation, forest degradation and barriers to REDD+ activities. Paramaribo, Suriname. Disclaimer The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency of the Government of Suriname. The purpose of the report is to feed the REDD+ readiness process with background information that will be further analysed and considered when developing the national REDD+ strategy for Suriname. Views and opinions expressed in this report, as well as assumptions made within the analysis, are those of the consultants or their informants and should not be seen as definite facts. -
Suriname, September 2002
Description of document: US Department of State Self Study Guide for Suriname, September 2002 Requested date: 11-March-2007 Released date: 25-Mar-2010 Posted date: 19-April-2010 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Office of Information Programs and Services A/GIS/IPS/RL U. S. Department of State Washington, D. C. 20522-8100 Fax: 202-261-8579 Note: This is one of a series of self-study guides for a country or area, prepared for the use of USAID staff assigned to temporary duty in those countries. The guides are designed to allow individuals to familiarize themselves with the country or area in which they will be posted. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. -
Background Study for the National Redd+ Strategy of Suriname
BACKGROUND STUDY FOR THE NATIONAL REDD+ STRATEGY OF SURINAME INVITATION TO A SIDE EVENT BACKGROUND STUDY FOR THE NATIONAL REDD+ STRATEGY OF SURINAME PUBLISHED BY: National Institute for Environment and Development in Suriname (NIMOS) REDD+ Program Management Unit Mr. Jagernath Lachmonstraat 100 Paramaribo, Suriname Phone: +597 490044 Website: www.nimos.org www.surinameredd.org PLEASE CITE AS FOLLOWS: AAE (2017). Background study for the National REDD+ Strategy of Suriname. Paramaribo, Suriname. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This Background study for the National REDD+ Strategy for Suriname has been prepared by the consultancy firm Asesoramiento Ambiental Estratégico/ Strategic Environmental Advice (AAE) for the National Institute for Environment and Development in Suriname (NIMOS). The authors wish to thank all the stakeholders who have contributed to this document, especially the staff of the REDD+ Project Management Unit (PMU), the Foundation for Forest Management and Production Control (SBB) and NIMOS. The SBB in particular played a significant role through the staff of its Forest Cover Monitoring Unit (FCMU) who produced the scenarios presented in section 3 in close collaboration with the consultant from AAE and with stakeholders from several institutions in Suriname. A scenario development training was held and stakeholders participated actively with data and staff time. Section 4 includes a more detailed description of the stakeholder engagement and we thank everybody who was involved in the process. DISCLAIMER: The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency of the Government of Suriname. The purpose of the study is to feed the REDD+ readiness process with background information that will be used when developing the National REDD+ Strategy for Suriname. -
Suriname: the Impact of the May 2006 Floods on Sustainable Livelihoods
ECLAC SUBREGIONAL HEADQUARTERS FOR THE CARIBBEAN S E R I 3 studies and perspectives Suriname: the impact of the May 2006 floods on sustainable livelihoods Rudolf Buitelaar Asha Kambon Michael Hendrickson Erik Blommestein Port of Spain, March 2007 This document was prepared by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) Subregional Headquarters for the Caribbean which would like to thank the Ministry of Regional Development, Government of Suriname, for the confidence deposited in the organization through the request for assessment of the socio-economic impact of the floods that affected the Brokopondo and Sipaliwini Districts in May 2006. The collaboration of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) was crucial in all stages, including the development of the idea of a socio-economic impact assessment, the provision of financial and logistical support and commenting the draft report. This mission took place thanks to the drive and conviction of Minister Michel Felisi of the Ministry of Regional Development and Ms. Inyang Ebong-Harstrup, Coordinator of the United Nations System in Suriname. The mission comprised: Rudolf Buitelaar, Coordinator; Michael Hendrickson, ECLAC, Macroeconomist/Agriculture; Asha Kambon, ECLAC, Social Sector/Sustainable Livelihoods; Erik Blommestein, ECLAC Consultant, Tourism/Environment and Salomon Emanuels, local UNDP consultant. Many people have made crucial inputs both in the training session that took place in September and the final field mission of November 2006. Chief among them was Mr. Anches from the Ministry of Regional Development as coordinator of the counterpart support. We acknowledge the critical contributions of the whole counterpart team that the Ministry of Regional Development managed to assemble. -
View a Copy of This Licence, Visit Mmons.Org/Licen Ses/By/4.0/
Labadie‑Bracho et al. Malar J (2020) 19:360 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936‑020‑03434‑y Malaria Journal RESEARCH Open Access Malaria serology data from the Guiana shield: frst insight in IgG antibody responses to Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium malariae antigens in Suriname Mergiory Y. Labadie‑Bracho1†, Farah T. van Genderen2† and Malti R. Adhin2* Abstract Background: Suriname has accomplished a steep decline in malaria burden, even reaching elimination levels. Plas- modium serology data are not available for Suriname and even extremely scarce within the region, therefore malaria serology testing was introduced, country customized cut‑of values were determined and a study was performed to explore the antibody status for Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium malariae. Methods: A cross‑sectional survey was conducted between July 2017 and March 2018 in two areas of the interior with diferent malaria settings: Stoelmanseiland, representing Maroon villages and Benzdorp, a gold mining area, with mostly Brazilian miners. Dried blood spots (DBS) were collected (n 197) and antibody presence against seven Plasmodium antigens was detected using a multiplex bead‑based, IgG antibody= assay. Demographic information was gathered through a questionnaire. Country customized cut‑of values were generated from a Surinamese malaria‑ naïve reference population (n 50). = Results: Serological analysis for the reference population revealed cut‑of values ranging from 14 MFI for LSA‑1 to 177 MFI for PmMSP‑119. Seroprevalence against any of the three MSP‑119 antibodies was similar in both regions and surpassed 75%. Single seropositivity against PfMSP‑119 antibodies was higher in Stoelmanseiland (27.0%) than Benzdorp (9.3%), in line with the historical malaria burden of Stoelmanseiland, while the reverse was observed for PvMSP‑119 antibodies. -
Policy Development Plan 2017
2017-2021 POLICY DEVELOPMENT PLAN Part 1 Development priorities of Suriname By consensus, jointly building a diversified Surinamese economy, which is competitive in the competitive global market, has significantly more sustainable development, generates employment and equality, and keeps the environment livable Government of the Republic of Suriname Publication of the Stichting Planbureau Suriname [Suriname Planning Bureau Foundation] January 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 6 Technical note ..................................................................................................................... 8 List of Abbreviations .........................................................................................................11 Chapter I: The Point of Departure ...................................................................................14 I.1 Macro Economic Considerations ...............................................................................14 I.1.1. International Economic Developments 2012-2016............................................. 14 I.1.2. National Economic Developments 2005-2016 ................................................... 16 I.1.2.1 Production and Income ...........................................................................16 I.1.2.2 Role Mineral Sector within the Economy ...............................................17 I.1.2.3 Monetary Developments: Exchange rate -
Suriname Competitiveness and Sector Diversification Project (SCSD)
Republic of Suriname Public Disclosure Authorized Suriname Competitiveness and Sector Diversification Project Public Disclosure Authorized (SCSD) Rapid Social Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized (P166187) June 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized ABBREVIATIONS ABO Assistant Government Manager (Assistant – Bestuursopzichter) AdeKUS Anton de Kom University of Suriname AoI Area of Influence BO Government manager (Bestuursopzichter) CPS Country Partnership Strategy DC District Commissioner DNA The National Assemblee (De Nationale Assemblee) DR District Council (Districtsraad) EBS Energy Company of Suriname (Energie Bedrijven Suriname) ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan GoS Government of Suriname IADB Inter-American Development Bank IACHR Inter-American Commission on Human Rights InvestSur Institute for the Promotion of Investments in Suriname (Instituut ter Bevordering van Investeringen in Suriname) ITPPF Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Planning Framework Km Kilometre LVV Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fishing, Ministry of (Landbouw, Veeteelt, Visserij) MI-GLIS Management Institute for Land Registration and Land Information System MZ-PHC Medical Mission Primary Health Care NGO None Governmental Organisation NH Natural resources, Ministry of (Natuurlijke Hulpbronnen) NIMOS National Institute for Environment and Development in Suriname (Nationaal Instituut voor Milieu en Ontwikkkeling Suriname) OP Operational Policy OWTC Public Works, Transportation and Communication, Ministry of -
Demarcation of Indigenous and Maroon Lands in Suriname
Demarcation of indigenous and maroon lands in Suriname Final report, submitted May 2009 Report commissioned by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and Amazon Conservation Team Suriname Paramaribo, Suriname Acknowledgements Conducting this study would not have been possible without the support and collaboration of many people in and outside of Suriname. I wish to thank numerous indigenous and maroon traditional leaders and villagers for sharing their time, knowledge, and perspectives about their lives, their village and their tribal area. A special word of thank is reserved for the granmans, kapiteins, and other formal representatives of the Saramaka, Ndyuka, Aluku, and Wayana for communicating their knowledge of the past, opinion of the present, and visions for the future. I also am grateful for the valuable information provided by many national government experts, such as the sub-director of Interior Affairs at the Ministry of Regional Development, the District Commissioners (DCs) of Sipaliwini and Marowijne, and various District Secretaries and bestuursopzichters (BO ; government supervisor). Outside of Suriname, staff members of government agencies and non governmental institutions dealing with indigenous or aboriginal affairs provided written and visual materials that helped me understand the particularities of land demarcation and titling issues in their country. I thank you all! This study was commissioned by the Amazon Conservation team-Suriname, as part of the ACT project for ‘Protected area creation and effective management in South Suriname/Northern Brazil’. Funding for this project has been provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation within its Andes-Amazon Initiative, with the purpose to: ‘… support the Surinamese Government in its efforts to implement land rights and demarcate indigenous lands in Suriname’ (http://www.moore.org/pa- grants-awarded.aspx?pa=34).