Climb A-GAN: Generation of Rock Climbing Problems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climb A-GAN: Generation of Rock Climbing Problems 1 Climb a-GAN: Generation of Rock Climbing Problems 59 2 60 3 ∗ 61 4 Cove Geary Joseph Valdez 62 5 [email protected] [email protected] 63 6 Yale University Yale University 64 7 New Haven, Connecticut New Haven, Connecticut 65 8 66 9 67 10 68 11 69 12 70 13 71 14 72 15 73 16 74 17 75 18 76 19 77 20 78 21 79 22 80 23 81 24 Figure 1: Example of a climber using a Moonboard 82 25 83 26 ABSTRACT ACM Reference Format: 84 27 Many rock climbing gyms have adopted a new type of rock climbing Cove Geary and Joseph Valdez. 2019. Climb a-GAN: Generation of Rock 85 Climbing Problems. In Proceedings of ACM Conference (Conference’17). ACM, 28 wall: the MoonBoard. The MoonBoard is a standardized interactive 86 New York, NY, USA, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/0000000.0000000 29 training wall of 11 x 18 holds that are identical in each gym. The 87 30 MoonBoard website provides a space for users to create new custom 88 31 paths, upload them, and even rate other paths. Using an ACGAN, it 89 32 is possible for a user to be able to input a difficulty for a desired rock 1 INTRODUCTION 90 33 climbing path and have it generate a new suggested path according Our project is motivated by two challenges in indoor rock climbing: 91 34 to that difficulty that is compatible with the MoonBoard. Current generating new climbing paths (route- or problem-setting); and 92 35 GitHub projects for MoonBoards generate a random path and then understanding what makes a particular problem challenging and 93 36 classify the difficulty, so this would be approaching it in reverse. fun. 94 37 By generating a path based on a given difficulty, it will be easier for Although the full space of possible mediums (wall size, arrange- 95 38 rock climbing users to find a path they would be able to attempt ment, etc.) for a climbing problem is huge, perhaps the best candi- 96 39 (and enjoy). The classifiers in the ACGAN are the different levels date medium for starting to approach this algorithmically would be 97 40 of difficulties of the rock climbing routes.Not The ACGAN for will output distribution.the MoonBoard. The MoonBoard is a standardized bouldering wall 98 41 an image of a MoonBoard withUnpublished the starting holds circled in green, workinglocated in gyms throughout draft. the world, such that every MoonBoard 99 42 the intermediate holds circled in blue, and the ending holds circled has the same features for hands and feet (holds) in the same place, 100 43 in red. arranged in a 11x18 grid. Climbing paths can be customized and 101 44 created by users on an online community. The MoonBoard website 102 45 KEYWORDS hosts an online community where users can create problems, as- 103 46 datasets, CGAN, conditional GAN, path generation sign them a difficulty, and share them publicly for others to view.A 104 47 problem on the MoonBoard is defined as a sequence of holds along 105 48 ∗Both authors contributed equally to this research. the grid. Each problem is given a grade (difficulty level) and a rating 106 49 (0-3 stars). There is even an app where users can upload paths so 107 50 Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or 108 classroomUnpublished use is granted working without fee draft. provided Not that copies for distribution.are not made or distributed there exists a healthy amount (many thousands) of accessible data! 51 for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation However, since users currently have to manually design paths 109 52 on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM and rate their difficulty, we were hoping this process could instead 110 must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, 53 111 to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a be streamlined with the aid of technology. It would be incredibly 54 fee. Request permissions from [email protected]. helpful if instead of creating your own path or even searching 112 55 Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA through thousands of paths to find one that matches your profi- 113 © 2019 Association for Computing Machinery. 56 114 ACM ISBN 978-x-xxxx-xxxx-x/YY/MM...$15.00 ciency with bouldering, a user could simply input their desired 57 https://doi.org/10.1145/0000000.0000000 difficulty and have a path automatically generated for them. 115 58 2019-12-11 22:52. Page 1 of 1–6. 116 Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA Geary and Valdez 117 This might be able to be achieved through a GAN, or Generative classifying MoonBoard problems [1]. Comparing Naive Bayes, Soft- 175 118 Adversarial Network. GANs are given training data, then using two max Regression, and CNN (with ordinal output), they found the 176 119 networks working against each other, eventually learns to generate CNN to be the best-performing. 177 120 new data similar to that of the training set. The two neural networks 178 121 are referred to as the generator and the discriminator. The job of 1.2 Related Work: ACGANs 179 122 the generator is to learn to generate new data capable of fooling Taking this further, it would be helpful for users to be able to 180 123 the discriminator into thinking it was from the initial training generate a path according to their desired difficulty, making it 181 124 data. The job of the discriminator is to be able to determine where easier to find a path they will enjoy. This could be possible byusing 182 125 the generated data is "real" or "fake", or whether the data is from an ACGAN, shown in the following figure. 183 126 the initial training data or fabricated by the generator. After many 184 127 iterations of this training, the generated data should so similar to the 185 128 training data that it fools the discriminator. The model architecture 186 129 is shown in the figure below. 187 130 188 131 189 132 190 133 191 134 192 135 193 136 194 137 195 138 196 139 197 140 198 141 199 142 200 Figure 2: Model of a GAN from 143 201 https://pathmind.com/wiki/generative-adversarial- 144 202 network-gan 145 203 146 204 147 205 Using this method, we could train a GAN using the thousands 148 206 of user-created MoonBoard problems with the intention of being 149 207 able to generate new problems similar (and equally traversable) to 150 208 the problems in the online community. 151 209 152 210 153 1.1 Related Work: Moonboards 211 154 As far as we can tell, very little work has been done thus far in the 212 155 space of climbing problem/route generation. Further, anecdotally 213 156 speaking, the task of route-setting tends to be seenNot by climbers for as distribution. 214 157 one that requires more than justUnpublished practical skill—it is one that draws working draft. 215 158 on creativity. For this reason, MoonBoard problem generation poses 216 159 an exciting challenge for generative models. 217 160 As mentioned, the space of climbing problem generation, and 218 161 even classification, seems to be relatively untouched. Some smaller 219 162 GitHub-hosted projects seem to apply neural networks to classify 220 163 the difficulty of existing MoonBoard problems (e.g. with anMLP, 221 164 with a CNN, with an LSTM). We found one one GitHub-hosted 222 165 project that seems to have experimented with generating novel 223 166 MoonBoard problems. However, each of these repositories appears 224 167 minimally-documented, and the results of each project is unclear. Figure 3: Model of an ACGAN 225 168 For the one generative project, problem generation and difficulty 226 169 classification are done in two separate steps, so the starting “hold” An AC-GAN, or Auxiliary Classifier Generative Adversarial Net- 227 170 is chosen at random to begin problem generation, and problem work, is an extension of the classic GAN method. In an ACGAN, 228 171 difficulty is assessed post-generation. the data is also given a classifier or label. The discriminator then 229 172 In one paper from an undergraduate machine learning final has one more job in addition to being able to determine whether 230 173 project, the authors present a more methodological approach to data is "real" or "fake". The discriminator now must also be able 231 174 2019-12-11 22:52. Page 2 of 1–6. 232 Climb a-GAN: Generation of Rock Climbing Problems Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA 233 to predict the class label of the given data. This then allows the 291 234 generation of data of a specific type, according to the class label. 292 235 In the case of rock climbing problems, the different difficulties 293 236 of the climbing problems could be used as the different classes. 294 237 The ACGAN could then generate paths similar to those of the 295 238 same difficulty in the training data set, which in this case would 296 239 be the collection of user-made paths on the MoonBoard website. 297 240 The generated image will then be a generic image of the 11 x 18 298 241 MoonBoard grid, and the holds that are used in the path will be 299 242 circled.
Recommended publications
  • 2. the Climbing Gym Industry and Oslo Klatresenter As
    Norwegian School of Economics Bergen, Spring 2021 Valuation of Oslo Klatresenter AS A fundamental analysis of a Norwegian climbing gym company Kristoffer Arne Adolfsen Supervisor: Tommy Stamland Master thesis, Economics and Business Administration, Financial Economics NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS This thesis was written as a part of the Master of Science in Economics and Business Administration at NHH. Please note that neither the institution nor the examiners are responsible − through the approval of this thesis − for the theories and methods used, or results and conclusions drawn in this work. 2 Abstract The main goal of this master thesis is to estimate the intrinsic value of one share in Oslo Klatresenter AS as of the 2nd of May 2021. The fundamental valuation technique of adjusted present value was selected as the preferred valuation method. In addition, a relative valuation was performed to supplement the primary fundamental valuation. This thesis found that the climbing gym market in Oslo is likely to enjoy a significant growth rate in the coming years, with a forecasted compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in sales volume of 6,76% from 2019 to 2033. From there, the market growth rate is assumed to have reached a steady-state of 3,50%. The period, however, starts with a reduced market size in 2020 and an expected low growth rate from 2020 to 2021 because of the Covid-19 pandemic. Based on this and an assumed new competing climbing gym opening at the beginning of 2026, OKS AS revenue is forecasted to grow with a CAGR of 4,60% from 2019 to 2033.
    [Show full text]
  • Smith Rock (All Dates Are Month/Day/Year)
    Smith Rock (all dates are month/day/year) 5.2 Arrowpoint, Northwest Corner (5.2 Trad) comments: This is the obvious way up the Arrowpoint. Although extremely short, it rewards one with a rare Smith summit experience, which is nice after climbing one of the multi-pitch routes on Smith Rock group. Unfortunately, the Arrowhead is not the true summit of the Smith Rock group. gear: 3 or 4 cams to #3 Camalot ascents: 06/25/2005 lead (approached via Sky Ridge) 03/23/2009 lead (approached via Sky Ridge, PB seconded) 5.5 New Route Left of Purple Headed Warrior (5.5 ? Bolts) comments: Squeeze job with so-so climbing. ascents: 11/6/2016 lead Bits and Pieces (1st Pitch) (5.5 Bolts) comments: Very easy fun route on huge knobs. ascents: 06/17/2001 lead My Little Pony (5.5 Bolts) comments: To the right of the Adventurous Pillar there are four bolted routes. This is the fourth one from the left. ascents: 05/09/2004 lead Night Flight (5.5 Bolts) comments: Route 22 in the Dihedrals section of smithrock.com, to the left of Left Slab Crack. Nice and easy lead. ascents: 03/16/2001 lead 03/30/2001 2nd (continued on Easy Reader 2nd pitch) North Slab Crack (5.5X or TR) comments: Horrible route. ascents: 09/16/2000 (TR) Pack Animal (to Headless Horseman belay) (5.5 Trad) comments: Easy and short trad lead. ascents: 02/08/2004 lead Spiderman Variation (1st pitch) (5.5 Trad) comments: Nice, but not as good as the 1st pitch of Spiderman proper.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiwi Canyons Grading Table
    Kiwi Canyons Grading Introduction The modern sport of canyoning has its roots strongly centered in Europe, and in particular France. As the sport began to really take off, a number of French Outdoor Associations standardised their grading systems in 2003. The gradings presented here are the English translation of those agreed on by the French Federation of Mountain Climbing (FFME), with support from the French Federation of Speleology (FFS) in conjunction with the National Union of Mountain Guides (SNGM), the National Union of Professionals Climbing and Canyoning (SNAPEC), the National Union of Professional Speoleogy and Canyoning (SNPSC) and the Federation of French Alpine Clubs (FCAF). There are several different canyon grading systems around the world, as our canyons are most similar to the European ones, the French grading system is used in NZ as it aligns with ‘best international practice’. Grading any technical activity is always an exercise in compromise. The grading is indicative of the most difficult section of the canyon and reflects the technical skill required to descend that part. In the grade, there is no way to distinguish between a canyon with one difficult section and another canyon where the whole canyon has difficult drop after difficult drop. The gradings must be used in conjunction with route descriptions and CanyonTopo to gain a better understanding of the overall difficulty of the trip. Remember that Canyons change with every flood, to the point that the initial grade may change. Assumptions The gradings here assume the following; An average water flow for the usual season that particular canyon is descended.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment for Abseiling
    Risk Assessment for Abseiling Reviews Completed By Revision Date Approved By Approval Date 171 Nojoor Road Twin waters QLD 4564 P: 1300 122677 R Shanks 04/04/2019 D Davidson 04/04/2019 Apexcamps.com.au Risk level Action required/approval Document controls in planning documents and/or complete this Some chance or an incident or injury requiring Curriculum Activity Risk Assessment. Medium first aid Consider obtaining parental/carer permission. Minimum supervision At least 1 qualified Activity Instructor and 1 competent Activities Assistant are to be present to run Abseiling. Total 2. Recommendations Abseiling is recommended for grade 5 and above for the 6 metre tower. It is recommended grades 7 and above can abseil from 12 metres . It is strongly recommended that at least 1 group teachers/supervisors are present to assist with student behaviours All Apex activities staff and contractors hold at a minimum ,one of the following qualifications /skills sets or other recognised skill sets/ qualifications from another jurisdiction, along with mandatory First Aid/ CPR and QLD Blue Card, working with children check. • Staff trained for correct use of “Gri Gri” safety device that lowers the rock climbing . • Certificate 3 Outdoor Recreation specialising in Rock Climbing & Abseiling Natural or Artificial Surfaces • Certificate 4 Outdoor Recreation specialising in Rock Climbing & Abseiling Natural or Artificial Surfaces • Diploma Outdoor recreation specialising is Rock Climbing & Abseiling Natural or Artificial Surfaces • Perform Vertical Rescue also Haul system abseil only. Through the use of well maintained equipment, training, accredited staff and sound operating procedures and policies, Apex Camps control the “real risks” associated with this activity In assessing the level of risk, considerations such as the likelihood of an incident happening in combination with the seriousness of a consequence are used to gauge the overall risk level for an activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Equipment and Clothing
    GUIDE TO EQUIPMENT AND CLOTHING GEAR FOR MOUNTAINEERING IN NEW ZEALAND This document provides advice on choosing the right clothing and gear for your Alpine Guides mountain trip. Refer to your trips' "Equipment Checklist" to find the exact gear you need. Use the information here as a guide only. We run a range of programs that vary in duration and emphasis. If you are not sure if your gear is right for the job, please contact us GUIDE TO EQUIPMENT AND CLOTHING GEAR FOR MOUNTAINEERING IN NEW ZEALAND INDEX PAGE How to Dress | Gear for Different Seasons Clothing | Layering, Thermals, and Fabrics Outer layer: Jackets & Overtrousers Hats, Gloves, Socks, Gaiters, and other items Boots and Footwear Technical Hardware | Crampons, Ice Axes, and more Sleeping Essentials | Sleeping bags, Bivouac bags Touring Gear: Skis, Boots, & Snowboards Miscellaneous Gear - Everything else How to Dress | Gear for Different Seasons Choose your mountain wardrobe around the time of year you will visit. Mountain huts are not heated. Temperatures are colder at night, even during summer. If your trip involves camping out, go for the warmest possible combination of clothing. Winter Gear (July - October) Choose: • Warmer down (500+ loft) and synthetic jackets • Medium to heavy grade thermals and socks • Warm, insulated gloves • 4-season sleeping bags (rated to approx -12°C) • Avoid using drinking bladders and hoses during winter - they are prone to freeze even when insulated. Summer Gear (November - April) There is a wide range of temperatures through summer. Be prepared for cool, to cold temperatures during storms and at night. Choose: • 3-season sleeping bags (rated to approx -5°C) • 400-500 loft down jackets or synthetic insulating jackets • Lightweight to mid-weight thermals and socks • UV Protection is Vital Through December, January and February especially bring "cooling" garments that will reflect UV.
    [Show full text]
  • US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, Carabiner,08/12/2019
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY EPA Reg. Number: Date of Issuance: Office of Pesticide Programs Registration Division (7505P) 34704-1130 8/12/19 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 NOTICE OF PESTICIDE: Term of Issuance: X Registration Reregistration Unconditional (under FIFRA, as amended) Name of Pesticide Product: Carabiner Name and Address of Registrant (include ZIP Code): LOVELAND PRODUCTS INC. P.O. BOX 1286 GREELEY, CO 80632 Note: Changes in labeling differing in substance from that accepted in connection with this registration must be submitted to and accepted by the Registration Division prior to use of the label in commerce. In any correspondence on this product always refer to the above EPA registration number. On the basis of information furnished by the registrant, the above named pesticide is hereby registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. Registration is in no way to be construed as an endorsement or recommendation of this product by the Agency. In order to protect health and the environment, the Administrator, on his motion, may at any time suspend or cancel the registration of a pesticide in accordance with the Act. The acceptance of any name in connection with the registration of a product under this Act is not to be construed as giving the registrant a right to exclusive use of the name or to its use if it has been covered by others. This product is unconditionally registered in accordance with FIFRA section 3(c)(5) provided that you: 1. Submit and/or cite all data required for registration/reregistration/registration review of your product when the Agency requires all registrants of similar products to submit such data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thick-Splay Depositional Style of the Crevasse Canyon Formation, Cretaceous of West-Central New Mexico Steven J
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/34 The thick-splay depositional style of the Crevasse Canyon Formation, Cretaceous of west-central New Mexico Steven J. Johansen, 1983, pp. 173-178 in: Socorro Region II, Chapin, C. E.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 34th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 344 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1983 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2016 Version 2
    March 2016 Version 2 Preface This Activity Safety Guideline for Canyoning is published by the Tourism Industry Association of New Zealand (TIA) with support from WorkSafe New Zealand. The guideline was developed in association with experts from the canyoning sector and other relevant technical experts. More information about the guideline development process can be found at www.supportadventure.co.nz/activity- specific-good-practice-information/activity-safety-guidelines The guideline is a web-based document and will be reviewed and updated as required. The current version is available at www.supportadventure.co.nz/activity-specific-good-practice- information/activity-safety-guidelines Users should periodically check the date and version number of the current online document to ensure that their printed copies are up-to-date. Activity Safety Guidelines are the result of a recommendation from the final report of the 2009/10 government review of risk management and safety in the adventure and outdoor commercial sector in New Zealand. The variety of activities provided by these sectors is referred to broadly as adventure activities, and include activities provided by adventure tourism operators and outdoor education centres. More information about the government review can be found at www.supportadventure.co.nz/about-site-and-government-safety-review TIA, WorkSafe New Zealand, and the canyoning community have made every effort to ensure that the information contained in this guideline is reliable. We make no guarantee of its accuracy or completeness and do not accept any liability for any errors. We may change, add to, delete from, or otherwise amend the contents of this publication at any time without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Sauratown Mountain
    Sauratown Mountain Cover photos: Daniel Chambo on Shock the Monkey and Anna Chapman on Barbs World/Leisure Time. Photo credits, Jeff Dunbar on Shock the Monkey and Emil Briggs on Barbs World. The Carolina Climbers Coalition has reached an agreement with the owners of Sauratown, previously one of the most popular winter destinations in the NC Piedmont. Home to a number of classic trad lines and many excellent sport routes, the area has been closed for years due to a variety of factors. If you've never climbed at Sauratown it's the best winter cragging in the Piedmont - steep and pumpy on incredible rock. If you used to climb there and haven't for the 5+ years it's been closed, welcome back it's just like your forearms remember it! IMPORTANT! Access will ONLY be allowed from December 1 to March 31st and is 7 days a week. Please do not jeopardize all of the hard work that has gone into this by trying to go to Sauratown at any other time. The cliff remains closed except for those times. Don't be the person who gets the gate slammed in our face. Seriously, don't. Many thanks to Camp Hanes, who has partnered with us on this and to the climbers who humped stainless steel up the trail and replaced 30+ bolts and anchors, flagged trail and cleaned up the base of the cliff. We wouldn't be having as much fun as we're going to have without your help. There is a fee associated with this agreement that the CCC is paying to get everyone access to the property.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Climbing Fundamentals Has Been Crafted Exclusively For
    Disclaimer Rock climbing is an inherently dangerous activity; severe injury or death can occur. The content in this eBook is not a substitute to learning from a professional. Moja Outdoors, Inc. and Pacific Edge Climbing Gym may not be held responsible for any injury or death that might occur upon reading this material. Copyright © 2016 Moja Outdoors, Inc. You are free to share this PDF. Unless credited otherwise, photographs are property of Michael Lim. Other images are from online sources that allow for commercial use with attribution provided. 2 About Words: Sander DiAngelis Images: Michael Lim, @murkytimes This copy of Rock Climbing Fundamentals has been crafted exclusively for: Pacific Edge Climbing Gym Santa Cruz, California 3 Table of Contents 1. A Brief History of Climbing 2. Styles of Climbing 3. An Overview of Climbing Gear 4. Introduction to Common Climbing Holds 5. Basic Technique for New Climbers 6. Belaying Fundamentals 7. Climbing Grades, Explained 8. General Tips and Advice for New Climbers 9. Your Responsibility as a Climber 10.A Simplified Climbing Glossary 11.Useful Bonus Materials More topics at mojagear.com/content 4 Michael Lim 5 A Brief History of Climbing Prior to the evolution of modern rock climbing, the most daring ambitions revolved around peak-bagging in alpine terrain. The concept of climbing a rock face, not necessarily reaching the top of the mountain, was a foreign concept that seemed trivial by comparison. However, by the late 1800s, rock climbing began to evolve into its very own sport. There are 3 areas credited as the birthplace of rock climbing: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SCRAMBLING Rob Recommends These… SCRAMBLING GRIBIN RIDGE Glyder Fawr Rack Rucksack Grade 1 Quickdraws – 2 Extendable and 3 a 35-45 Litre Rucksack Will Be Best
    =;7H=K?:; ?DOEKHHK9AI79A STEP INTO KIT FOR BAILEY TOM SCRAMBLING Rob recommends these… SCRAMBLING GRIBIN RIDGE Glyder Fawr Rack Rucksack Grade 1 Quickdraws – 2 extendable and 3 A 35-45 litre rucksack will be best. Start at Ogwen Cottage regular. These link protection to the rope Make sure that it’s not too bulky (SH649604) Protection – set of wires sized 1-10 (1-5 and no wider than your back on one karabiner and 6-10 on another). Rob uses: Crux AK47 or Mammut These slot into a groove on the rack Granit 30 Helmet Hexes – 2 bigger ones and a smaller Make sure it fits properly – one. These fit into the cracks in the rocks and remember to wear it LITTLE AND Belay plate – for belaying your partner Rob uses: Petzl Meteor III 3 x 120cm slings NORTH 3 screwgates GULLIES Prussik cords A knife for dealing with abseil retreats Tryfan Grade 1 Gloves Start at Gwern Gof Uchaf Need to be thinner and more dexterous (SH673604) when scrambling Rob uses: Black Diamond Glissade gloves STRIDING 105/09 EDGE AM O. N Helvellyn E NC E Grade 1 C Start at Glenridding LI IA (NY386169) D ME S ’ ER U BA / Waterproof MM WITH WITH jacket LEDGE N Make sure that it won’t ROUTE IATIO interfere with a harness, C O the hood will fit over a Ben Nevis SS A helmet and the pockets Grade 1 N remain accessible I HT Rob uses: Crux Event Start at Torlundy G YRI (NN145763) P Flak Jacket O C N © CROW © RING OF STEALL Mamores Grade 1 Starts from Steall Cottage, Glen Nevis (NN168691) Harness Am Bodach Go for one that is light, simple and suitable for scrambling.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Retaining Students in the Early Grades Self-Defeating?
    Center on Children and Families at BROOKINGS August 2012 CCF Brief # 49 Is Retaining Students in the Early Grades Self-Defeating? Martin R. West | 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036 | 202.797.6000 | fax 202.697.6004 | brookings edu Acknowledgements The Center on Children and Families thanks the Campaign for Grade-Level Reading, the Piton Foundation, and the Birth to Five Policy Alliance for their support in conceiving and funding this policy brief and associated outreach activities. Summary Whether a child is a proficient reader by the third grade is an important indicator of their future academic success. Indeed, substantial evidence indicates that unless students establish basic reading skills by that time, the rest of their education will be an uphill struggle. This evidence has spurred efforts to ensure that all students receive high-quality reading instruction in and even before the early grades. It has also raised the uncomfortable question of how to respond when those efforts fail to occur or prove unsuccessful: Should students who have not acquired a basic level of reading proficiency by grade three be promoted along with their peers? Or should they be retained and provided with intensive interventions before moving on to the next grade? Several states and school districts have recently enacted policies requiring that students who do not demonstrate basic reading proficiency at the end of third grade be retained and provided with remedial services. Similar policies are under debate in state legislatures around the nation. Although these policies aim to provide incentives for educators and parents to ensure that students meet performance expectations, they can also be expected to increase the incidence of retention in the early grades.
    [Show full text]