DOCSLIB.ORG

International Mobility & Trade Corridor Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IMTC International Mobility & Trade Corridor Program Overview for the WA State Transportation Commission June 16, 2020 Melissa Fanucci, AICP - Principal Planner (360) 685-8385 [email protected] The Cascade BRITISH COLUMBIA WASHINGTON Gateway Sumas - Huntingdon Lower Mainland Whatcom County Point Roberts – Peace Arch - Pacific Lynden - Boundary Bay Douglas Highway Aldergrove A unique border crossing community • 76% of border travelers Population Growth, 2008-2018 in this region cross at least once a month 17% • 3rd busiest passenger 13% crossing on U.S. – Canada border. 11% 10% 10% 8% • The Cascade Gateway has had disproportionate population growth for over 20 years. USA Canada WA BC Whatcom BC Border County Region Stakeholders at the border 20 years of passenger vehicle volumes 2019 Traffic volume at late 90s levels 20 Years of truck volumes IMTC Objectives • Plan Cascade Gateway as a system • Improve data collection and information • Identify and fund needed improvements – Infrastructure – Operations – Technology The IMTC is a U.S. – Canadian – Security coalition of government and business entities that identifies and promotes improvements to mobility and security for the Cascade Gateway. IMTC Organization Meets monthly/bi-monthly Makes recommendations What IMTC is: A forum A platform for coordination Meets 2-3 times a year An informal trust-based coalition Makes decisions A source of border-related data What IMTC is not: Meets as needed An agency Dialogue with broad constituency A recipient of funds Provides feedback A source of funds A policy-making body IMTC Public Sector Participation Transportation Other Governmental • U.S. Federal Hwy Administration • U.S. General Services • Transport Canada Administration • U.S. Federal Transit Administration • U.S. Consulate, Vancouver • WA State Dept. of Transportation • Canadian Consulate, Seattle • B.C. Ministry of Transportation • Local, state, provincial and federal • Port of Bellingham legislators • Port Metro Vancouver • Whatcom Council of Governments • TransLink At-border Municipalities • Whatcom County, WA • Whatcom Transportation Authority • City of Surrey, BC • City of Blaine, WA Inspection/Enforcement • City of Lynden, WA • Canada Border Services Agency • City of Sumas, WA • U.S. Customs & Border Protection • City of Abbotsford, BC • U.S. Border Patrol • Township of Langley, BC IMTC Private Sector & NGOs Private Sector Non-Governmental • BC Trucking Association • Chambers of commerce • WA Trucking Association • Cascadia Center • Duty Free stores • Pacific NorthWest Economic Region • NW Motorcoach Association • Pacific Corridor Enterprise Council • BNSF Railroad • Tourism BC • Amtrak • Vancouver Board of Trade • Border brokerages IMTC Funding, 1999-2020 (in thousands, USD) Other $813 WA State $2,126 BC Province $2,593 Canadian Federal $2,861 U.S. Federal $9,876 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 Summary of IMTC Projects 1999-2009 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 IMTC Coordination 2000 Trade & BC Hwy 15 NEXUS Shortsea Shipping 2008 Passenger Travel Survey & FAST Lanes Study Intercept Survey WIM Software ATIS Southbound 2009 CVO Study Integration NEXUS Sumas ATIS Border Data Border Data Rail Study Marketing Enhancements Warehouse Warehouse BIFA Cross-Border Traffic BC Hwy 99 NEXUS FAST First Evaluation Model Lane Extension Cross-Border Blaine Interchange APDR Transit Study ITS/CVO Phase FAST NEXUS & EDL ITS/CVO Phase II III Marketing Marketing PACE Abbotsford-Sumas Abbotsford Staging 2006 CVO Study Marketing Improvements Area Studies ITS Infrastructure Planning Marketing Summary of IMTC Projects 2010-2020 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 IMTC Coordination 2013/2014 Passenger Intercept Survey Booth Status NII Discrete Data Event Modeling Integration US – Canada Border Data Warehouse 2018/2019 Passenger Intercept Survey FAST Pilot Dynamic Border Study Management Border Data Warehouse 2015/2016 Freight Border Data 2.0 Operations Study Warehouse 3.0 Studies ITS Infrastructure Planning Current Projects: Border Data Warehouse 3.0 Upgrade Current Projects: Pacific Highway Port Redesign Current Projects: Peace Arch Northbound Anti-idling System Current Projects: Border Simulation Modeling Baseline Hours of the day Collaborative Efforts Communication Protocol – Highway and Border Station Incents that Affect Cross-Border Travel • US Customs & Border Protection • Canada Border Services Agency • BC Ministry of Transportation • WA State Department of Transportation • Royal Canadian Mounted Police • WA State Patrol • Transport Canada Coordinated Planning Coordinated Construction Schedule IMTC Cascade Gateway Construction Schedule - V. Sep 19, 2013 This schedule portrays estimated start and end dates of active construction phases of the listed projects so that agencies can maximize awareness of cumulative impacts on traffic on Estimated start and end dates. For discussion only. regional cross-border routes and coordinate mitigation and traveler information accordingly. Project Project 2013 2014 2015 Agency JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND Guide Meridian Road (SR 539) Access WSDOT Control WSDOT Roundabouts on SR 546 BC MoT Highway 99 at 16 Avenue Interchange Township of Traffic signal installation at 16th & 248th Langley BC Hwy 13 / 0 Ave / Aldergrove POE BC MoT reconfiguration and improvements CBSA Aldergrove POE replacement Guide Meridian Road (SR 539) Port of Entry WSDOT approach improvements WSDOT SR 9 & SR 539 ATIS BC Hwy 11 NEXUS approach from Vye Rd to BC MoT Sumas POE BC Hwy 15 FAST lane extenstion from 2nd BC MoT Deferred Ave to 4th Ave Legend Cascade Gateway Summary Peace Arch - Douglas Pacific Highway Aldergrove - Lynden Abbotsford-Huntingdon — Sumas General impact Coordinated Planning TBWG: Transportation Border Working Group IMTC 2019 Future Project List 1. RFID Travel Document Targeted Distribution 10. Bluetooth/Wi-Fi Border Wait Time Pilot & Performance Evaluation System 2. Pacific Highway Cross-Border Pedestrian 11. Cascade Gateway Border Data Route Improvements Warehouse 3.0 Upgrade 3. Coordination of Binational Planning –The 12. CBSA Pacific Highway Port-of-Entry IMTC Program Redevelopment 4. Cascade Gateway Border Circulation Analysis 13. Douglas Metered Arrival Signal Phase II System/Anti-Idling Zone 5. WA State Route 548 Rail Grade Separation 14. Abbotsford-Huntingdon/Sumas & Study/Design Aldergrove/Lynden Assessment 6. Commercial vehicle wait-time 15. Regional Cross-Border Mail Study assessment/validation 16. Boundary Bay Port-of-Entry 7. Additional Passenger Inspection Booths at Redevelopment CBP Pacific Highway 17. Commercial Vehicle Freight & 8. Pacific Highway Southbound Lane-to-Booth Operations Study Traffic Flow Improvements 9. Pacific Highway Northbound Active Lane Management Data Collection Studies Resources • PACE study • Website data • 2000 trade and travel • Border data warehouse • Abbotsford-Sumas • Annual resource manual • Rail • Databases upon request • Transit • Individualized reports • ITS-CVO • Blaine APDR • Shortsea Shipping • 2006 CVO Study • 2008 travel study • Border circulation analysis • Lynden/Aldergrove study • 2009 CVO study • FAST pilot study • 2013 travel study Indicators of effectiveness System performance Collaborative efforts Binational funding Coordinated strategies $40 million in binational funding for regional priorities Unparalleled levels of partnership National best practice Informing national policy (Beyond the Border Action Plan) Current Status with Covid-19: Southbound Peace Arch/Pacific Hwy Auto Volume Current Status with Covid-19: Northbound Pacific Highway Truck Volume 2019 vs. 2020; Weekly (Mon-Fri) Cross-border Truck Volume; Northbound Pacific Highway; Mar, Apr, May, June; by Sequential Week 7,000 6,000 5,000 March 11: June 1-5: WHO Est. 12% declares March 21: 4,000 COVID-19 a down from Canada & 2019 pandemic U.S. restrict 2nd week April: cross-border Est. 25% down 3,000 travel to Trucks from essential 2019 trend trips only 2,000 2019 1,000 2020 Fit trend 2019 0 Mar Apr May June 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Months & Sequential Weeks Future challenges and opportunities • End of FHWA Coordinated Border Infrastructure funding • Opportunities to leverage U.S. with Canadian funding • Small investments for national trade flow impacts Contact Information: Melissa Fanucci, AICP Principal Planner (360) 685-8385 [email protected] www.theimtc.org.
Recommended publications
  • ONE HUNDRED YEARS of PEACE: Memory and Rhetoric on the United States/ Canadian Border, 1920-1933

    ONE HUNDRED YEARS of PEACE: Memory and Rhetoric on the United States/ Canadian Border, 1920-1933

    ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF PEACE: Memory and Rhetoric on the United States/ Canadian Border, 1920-1933 Paul Kuenker, Ph.D. Student, School of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies, Arizona State University In the fall of 2010, artists Annie Han and Daniel Mihalyo of the Seattle- based Lead Pencil Studio installed their newest sculpture adjacent to the border crossing station located at Blaine, Washington and Surrey, British Columbia on the U.S./Canadian border. Funded by the U.S. General Services Administration’s Art in Architecture program as part of its renovation of the border crossing station, Han and Mihalyo’s Non-Sign II consists of a large rectangular absence created by an intricate web of stainless steel rods (Figure 1). The sculpture evokes the many billboards that dot the highway near the border, yet this “permanent aperture between nations,” as Mihalyo refers to it, frames only empty space. According to Mihalyo, the sculpture plays on the idea of a billboard in order to “reinforce your attention back to the landscape and the atmosphere, the thing that the two nations share in common.”1 Though it may or may not have been their intention, the artists ofNon- Sign II placed the work in a location where it is easily juxtaposed with a border monument from a different era—a concrete archway situated on the boundary between the United States and Canada. Designed by prominent road-builder and Pacific Highway Association President Samuel Hill, the Peace Arch was formally dedicated at a grand ceremony held on September 6, 1921, to celebrate over one hundred years of peace between the United States, Great Britain and Canada since the 1814 Treaty of Ghent (Figure 2).
  • Cross Border Transportation Patterns at the Western Cascade Gateway: Implications for Mitigating the Impact of Delay on Regional Supply Chains Anne Victoria Goodchild

    Cross Border Transportation Patterns at the Western Cascade Gateway: Implications for Mitigating the Impact of Delay on Regional Supply Chains Anne Victoria Goodchild

    Western Washington University Western CEDAR Border Policy Research Institute Publications Border Policy Research Institute 2008 Cross Border Transportation Patterns at the Western Cascade Gateway: Implications for Mitigating the Impact of Delay on Regional Supply Chains Anne Victoria Goodchild Susan Albrecht Li Ying Leung Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/bpri_publications Part of the Economics Commons, Geography Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Goodchild, Anne Victoria; Albrecht, Susan; and Leung, Li Ying, "Cross Border Transportation Patterns at the Western Cascade Gateway: Implications for Mitigating the Impact of Delay on Regional Supply Chains" (2008). Border Policy Research Institute Publications. 83. https://cedar.wwu.edu/bpri_publications/83 This Research Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Border Policy Research Institute at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Border Policy Research Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cross Border Transportation Patterns at the Western Cascade Gateway and Trade Corridor: Implications for Mitigating the Impact of Delay on Regional Supply Chains Anne Goodchild, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Susan Albrecht, MAPS Graduate Research Assistant and Li Leung Graduate Research Assistant Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Research Report No. 6 June 2008 Border Policy Research Institute Western Washington University Bellingham, Washington www.ac.wwu.edu/~bpri/ About the Border Policy Research Institute The BPRI focuses on research that informs policy-makers on matters related to the Canada – U.S. border. Policy areas of importance include transportation and mobility, security, immigration, energy, environment, economics, and trade.
  • Seattle Report

    Seattle Report

    EPA: CARE Level I Final Report International District CARE Project Community elder shares her perspectives at the first CARE partner meeting, 2005 Better Housing, Happier Lives, Stronger Communities _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 606 Maynard Avenue South, Suite 105 . Seattle WA 98104 . Tel (206) 623-5132 . Fax: (206) 623-3479 . www.idhousingalliance.org Grantee: International District Housing Alliance Project location: Seattle’s Chinatown-International District, Seattle, WA – King County Project title: International District CARE Project Grant period: October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2007 Project Manager: Joyce Pisnanont EPA Project Officer: Sally Hanft Personal Reflection: Reflecting on the past two years of the ID CARE project, it is evident that our community has had many wonderful successes, as well as a fair share of challenges. Our successes included a tremendous amount of culturally relevant outreach and education and the development of a strong core of community leadership amongst limited English speaking populations. Our greatest challenges were maintaining the momentum of the work in the face of organizational restructuring (in year 2) and growing anti-immigrant sentiments nationwide that inhibited civic participation on the part of our immigrant youth and elders. Perhaps our greatest area for improvement is the partnership development piece. Since 2005, IDHA has successfully garnered many new partnerships, but needs to strengthen our project advisory committee so as to be truly representative of the multiple community stakeholders that are essential for driving the project forward. This became most clear during our recent CARE National Training in Atlanta, GA. In listening to the successes and challenges of other CARE grantees, it became evident where the ID community’s strengths lay, and where we could have done many things differently.
  • Download Brochure

    Download Brochure

    LynnwoodTourism.com Lynnwood, WA 98046 Seattle N�� SHOP HERE P.O. Box 5008 Lynnwood is a shopper’s delight! From unique one of a kind shops to the region’s Y destination shopping center, Lynnwood has it all. 0 Seattle N�� 6 Lynnwood is home to Alderwood, a 1.3 LYNNWOOD RECREATION CENTER million square foot shopping center with a unique mix of retail, entertainment, and dining options. Alderwood is the go-to retail destination for GET HERE locals and visitors alike. Cars/Buses EVERETT Down the street from Alderwood, savvy shoppers will Lynnwood is easily accessible nd Nordstrom Rack, Designer Shoe Warehouse, from Interstates 5 and 405. 5 BOEING/ Old Navy, and Best Buy. Over a dozen furniture The Lynnwood Transit Center is PAINE FIELD stores are clustered in the shopping district served by Community Transit SNOHOMISH COUNTY too. Antiquing is minutes away in and Sound Transit providing LYNNWOOD Edmonds and Snohomish, and summer local and regional bus service. PUGET SOUND 5 WOODINVILLE brings a variety of local farmer’s markets throughout the region. Planes Lynnwood is 8 miles south of Paine Field BELLEVUE Lynnwood oers shoppers Airport and 30 miles north of SEATTLE a great deal more! SeaTac International Airport. Trains Amtrak’s Cascades and Empire Builder STAY interstate routes and the Sounder commuter train to Seattle are available from the Edmonds station, 5 miles west of Lynnwood. MEET HERE PLAY Ferries Washington State Ferry terminals provide service from Edmonds to Kingston (5 miles Looking for the perfect location for your gathering? Look west) and Mukilteo to Whidbey Island (9 miles north).
  • 123011 TXT Placed.Indd

    123011 TXT Placed.Indd

    University of Groningen 'Aaron' d'Yves Thériault ou comment transgresser l'entre-deux den Toonder, J. M. L. Published in: Canadian Literature IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2010 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): den Toonder, J. M. L. (2010). 'Aaron' d'Yves Thériault ou comment transgresser l'entre-deux. Canadian Literature, 206(Autumn), 74-87. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 12-11-2019 Canadian Literature / Littérature canadienne A Quarterly of Criticism and Review Number !"#, Autumn !"$" Published by %e University of British Columbia, Vancouver Editor: Margery Fee Associate Editors: Laura Moss (Reviews), Glenn Deer (Reviews), Larissa Lai (Poetry), Réjean Beaudoin (Francophone Writing), Judy Brown (Reviews) Past Editors: George Woodcock ($&'&–$&((), W.H.
  • Michigan's Railroad History

    Michigan's Railroad History

    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
  • Puget Sound Seattle

    Puget Sound Seattle

    2 Marysville Sound Transit Services 92 Eb Langley e Service Sound Puget Central Area y S 9 ST Express regional bus a l Snohomish County Ste m o Snohomish County b u oat g Sounder commuter rail 529 S h Whidbey Page 4 lo Lake u Everett-Seattle Sounder g Stevens 5 h Lakewood-Seattle Sounder Island Gedney I. S N Lake Link light rail O I S H L College Stevens Central Link, current service A O 204 N M Possession Downtown Station D I S Central Link, future service C H Everett O 525 C Everett U Sound Tacoma Link O Page 6 N U r Station T e N 2 Y n Facilities and Other Services Clinton T d Y ar Useless G Regional transportation hub rt P o Park & Ride Bay Mukilteo Transit center Flowing Everett Lake Transit center / Park & Ride Mulkiteo Station 525 Freeway station 5 S noh Mukilteo omish R Snohomish Freeway station / Park & Ride 526 ive I Eastmont r S K L I A Sounder station / Park & Ride T S N A D P 99 Link light rail stations Mall Station C C O O Snohomish County Central Link, current U U N South Everett N Airport - Paine Field T Central Link, future T Y Y 527 Tacoma Link 96 Amtrak train station Mariner McCollum Ferry terminals and routes Puget Mill Washington State Ferries 525 Creek Monroe 2 Pierce CountyY Ferries Ash Way T N Swamp Creek U Y r KingO CountyT Water Taxi Sound ive C N 99 9 R N U O O Lynnwood Vicinity S Car/passenger C ferry route 203 R P Page 7 E A FF S Passenger-only ferry route omish E IT Lynnwood kyk J K S 3 Edmonds 524 Edmonds CC S Airport 527 522 n 405 o qu Edmonds Lynnwood a l ST Service Area & Subareas 524 m Edmonds Darker shades at right represent cities.
  • High Speed Rail on the Pacific Coast

    High Speed Rail on the Pacific Coast

    High Speed Rail on the Pacific Coast Released for comment and discussion by the Premier of British Columbia and the Governors of Washington, Oregon and California on November 16, 2010. Action on Transportation: Pacific Coast Collaborative 1.0 Introduction At the February 2010 Pacific Coast Collaborative Leaders’ Forum, the Governors of California, Oregon and Washington and the Premier of British Columbia released for public comment and discussion “Vision 2030: Positioning Pacific North America for Sustainable Prosperity.” This document highlights that, over the next 20 years, “the jurisdictions along North America’s Pacific Coast are poised to emerge as a mega-region and global economic powerhouse driven by innovation, energy, geographic location, and sustainable resource management, attracting new jobs and investment while enhancing an already unparalleled quality of life.” A key component of this vision is high-speed rail. In Vision 2030, the Governors and Premier envision environmentally friendly, high-speed rail corridors in operation throughout the region in 2030, facilitated by public-private partnerships; with high-speed rail corridors connecting San Diego to Sacramento, and Portland to Seattle and Vancouver, British Columbia. In their Action Plan on Innovation, Environment and Economy, the Governors and the Premier directed their appropriate agencies and officials to examine going further still to undertake a joint feasibility study for their consideration on methods to supplement and leverage existing and planned high-speed rail investments to fully connect the region from San Diego through Portland and Seattle to Vancouver, British Columbia. This document represents Phase 1 of the requested study. Action on Transportation: Pacific Coast Collaborative | Page 1 2.0 Why High-Speed Rail? Rail is an efficient transportation mode that saves energy and reduces greenhouse gas emissions.
  • ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY San Juan Island National

    ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY San Juan Island National

    ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY San Juan Island National Historical Park National Park Service Seattle, Washington PLEASE RETURN TO TECHNICAL INFORMATION Cwt DENVER SERVICE CENTER NATIONAL PARK SERVICE San Juan Island National Historical Park Administrative History wz, Kelly June Cannon Prepared for the National Park Service Seattle Support Office November 20, 1997 Table of Contents L Introduction 1 H. Historical Background 7 The Central Coast Salish 7 Explorers, Fur Traders, and Settlers 9 HI. Preserving American and English Camps 31 IV. San Juan Island National Historical Park Management 43 Development Planning Master Plan, 1969 45 Lands Acquisition 50 Carl Stoddard, 1969-1974 54 Centennial of Boundary Dispute 60 American Camp By-Pass Road 60 Segismand Zachwieja, 1974-1980 61 General Management Plan, 1979 63 Frank Hastings, 1980-1984 75 Richard Hoffman, 1985-1991 Road Relocation 79 Friday Harbor Administrative Office 79 A New Maintenance Facility 80 Robert Scott, 1991 to Present 80 V. Resource Management 83 Historic Resource Study 83 Historic Structures Report: Architectural Data 91 Blockhouse 93 Barracks 93 Commissary 95 Hospital 95 The Crook House 97 The Redoubt 99 Officers' Quarters 100 Laundress' Quarters 102 Robert's Plaque and other features 102 Historic Landscapes 104 English Camp Formal Garden 104 Historic Landscapes of San Juan Island N.H.P. 107 Consideration for Grassland Vegetation Management 108 Historic Landscape Study 109 Pilot Planting Project 116 Archaeological Resources 117 University of Idaho 117 University of Washington 120 Guss Island 122 Archaeological Overview and Base Map 122 Additional Studies 123 Collections Management 125 Natural Resources 127 Water 127 Rabbits 128 Birds 129 Clams 130 Research Permits 130 Resource Management Plans 130 Interdisciplinary Planning Team 132 VI.
  • Fact Sheet Peace Arch Land Port of Entry Peace Arch Built in 1921, Renovated in 1979 and 2010 (Gross Square Footage 51,782)

    Fact Sheet Peace Arch Land Port of Entry Peace Arch Built in 1921, Renovated in 1979 and 2010 (Gross Square Footage 51,782)

    GSA Northwest/Arctic Region Fact Sheet Peace Arch Land Port of Entry Peace Arch built in 1921, renovated in 1979 and 2010 (Gross square footage 51,782) 100 Peace Portal Drive Blaine, Washington 98230 Property Manager: John Shaffer Cell: (206) 369-4077 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.gsa.gov GSA constructed the new state-of-the-art Peace Arch Land reduce water runoff. The project is also the first land port of Port of Entry (LPOE), in Blaine, Washington, in 2010. The entry to incorporate an advanced exterior lighting design to original 1920’s-era brick building underwent a major rebuild in reduce energy usage and light pollution into the atmosphere, 1979 and then again from 2007 to 2010. The new facility was and the campus incentivizes hybrid and electric vehicles by formally dedicated in March 2011. The modernization including six new charging stations, and provides them with enhanced border security, and provided a more welcoming priority parking spaces. The project has achieved a Leadership experience for visitors to both Canada and the United States. in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) gold certification The reconstructed LPOE also features innovative technologies from the U.S. Green Building Council, the first LPOE to that will ensure taxpayers benefit from increased energy achieve this distinction in the U.S. Additionally, the new land savings. port showcases additional inspection booths to bolster security, The Peace Arch LPOE serves as the the major U.S. to Canada . The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 border crossing where U.S. Interstate 5 ( I-5) through Seattle partially funded the recent $107 million project.

  • Amtrak Cascades-Seattle-Vancouver-Eugene-Springfield-February202016

    FEBRUARY 20, 2016 Effective ® SEATTLE / VANCOUVER – and – EUGENE / SPRINGFIELD Enjoy the journey. 1-800-USA-RAIL Call VANCOUVER - SEATTLE TACOMA - PORTLAND - SALEM EUGENE/SPRINGFIELD and intermediate stations AMTRAK.COM Visit NRPC Form W32––100M–2/20/16 Stock #02-3321 Schedules subject to change without notice. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corp. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. AMTRAK CASCADES-Southbound Amtrak Amtrak Amtrak Coast Amtrak Amtrak Amtrak Amtrak Amtrak Train Name Thruway Thruway Thruway Thruway Thruway Thruway Cascades Cascades Cascades Starlight Cascades Cascades Cascades Cascades Cascades Train Number 503 b 505 b 501 11 513 513 b 507 bb509 b 517 Normal Days of Operation Mo-Fr&¡ Daily SaSu&™ Daily Daily Daily SaSu&™ Mo-Fr&¡ Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily R B y R B y R B y R s R B R B y R B y R B y R B y R R R RR R On Board Service l åE l åE l åE r lE y l å l åE l åE l åE l åE Mile Symbol Vancouver, BC (PT) 0 ∑v Dp b5 30A l6 30A l6 30A b9 00A b11 30A b4 00P l5 35P –Pacific Central Station Richmond, BC 12 > bR5 50A bR9 30A bR12 00N bR4 30P –Sandman Signature Hotel Surrey, BC–Pacific Inn 29 > bR6 20A bR10 00A bR12 30P bR5 30P Bellingham, WA 62 ∑w- l8 32A l8 32A b3 10P l7 37P (Alaska Marine Highway) Mount Vernon, WA 88 >w- 9 02A 9 02A b3 45P 8 07P Stanwood, WA 103 >w 9 16A 9 16A 8 21P Everett, WA 123 ∑v- l9 52A l9 52A b4 30P l8 59P Edmonds, WA 139 ∑w- l10 17A l10 17A l9 24P Seattle, WA 157
  • Antonio Perez President and CEO, Talgo, Inc. 1000 Second Ave., Suite 1950 Seattle, WA 98104

    Antonio Perez President and CEO, Talgo, Inc. 1000 Second Ave., Suite 1950 Seattle, WA 98104

    Antonio Perez President and CEO, Talgo, Inc. 1000 Second Ave., Suite 1950 Seattle, WA 98104 October 29, 2019 Via E-mail to [email protected] The Honorable Robert L. Sumwalt Chairman, National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza East, SW Washington DC 20594 Re: Talgo, Inc. Petition for Reconsideration of National Transportation Safety Board Investigation No. RRD18MR001, Accident Report NTSB/RAR-19/01 Dear Chairman Sumwalt: In accordance with 49 C.F.R. § 845.32, Talgo, Inc. petitions the National Transportation Safety Board to reconsider several of its findings and safety recommendations and its statement of the probable cause of the injuries and fatalities sustained in the high-speed derailment of Amtrak train 501 near DuPont, Washington, on December 18, 2017. Talgo also requests an opportunity to meet with the NTSB Board Members and the NTSB investigators considering this Petition to assist in their understanding of the information contained herein. Sincerely, Antonio Perez President and CEO, Talgo, Inc. Attachments: (1) Certificate of Service (2) Talgo, Inc. Petition for Reconsideration Page 2 Chairman Sumwalt October 29, 2019 cc: The Honorable Bruce Landsberg, Vice Chairman, National Transportation Safety Board The Honorable Jennifer Homendy, Member, National Transportation Safety Board Michael Hiller, Investigator-in-Charge, National Transportation Safety Board Investigation No. RRD18MR001 Kathleen Silbaugh, General Counsel, National Transportation Safety Board Scott Barrett, Party Coordinator, Federal Railroad Administration