DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impact of Farm Mechanization on Small-Scale Rice Production

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Impact of Farm Mechanization on Small-Scale Rice Production THE IMPACT OF FARM MECHANIZATION ON SMALL-SCALE RICE PRODUCTION Y OLANDA L . TAN MASTER OF SCIENCE (Agricultural Economics) March , 1981 THE IFPACT OF FARM MECHANIZATION ON SMALL-SCALE RICE PRODUCTION YOLANDA L. TAN SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES AT LOS BmOS IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (Agricultural Economics) March, 1981 The thesis attached hereto entitled: THE IMPACT OF FARM MECHANIZATION ON SMALLeSCALE RICE PRODUCTIONp prepared and submitted by YOLANDA L. TAN, in partial fullfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Agricultural Economics), is hereby accepted: BART DUFF' Member. Guidance Committee Member, Guidance Committe fl. /- TIRSO B. PARIS, Adviser and Chairman Guidance Committee 3-&rP/ (Date) Accepted as partial fullfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Agricultural Economics). DOLORES A. RAMIREZ Dean, Graduate School University of the Philippines at Los Ba5os BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Yolanda L. Tan was born in San Pablo City, Laguna on October 17, 1956. She finished her high school education in 1974 at the Laguna College in San Pablo City. In the same year, she was awarded the local State Scholarship grant to pursue undergraduate studies at the University of the Philip- pines at 1.0s Baiios. She finished her college education in 1978 with the degree of Bachelor of Science in Statistics. After graduation, she joined the Commerce Department's teaching staff of the Laguna College. In 1979, she was granted J' an IAPMP (Integrated Agricultutal Productivity and Marketing Program) Fellowship to pursue a Master's degree in Agricul- tural Economics at the University of the Philippines at Los Bafios. For her thesis work, she was awarded a partial sholar- ship by the International Rice Research Institute as a Research scholar. Presently, she is an instructor in the Economics Department of the College of Development Economics and Manage- ment, UP at Los Baiios. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT My most sincere gratitude and profound appreciation to my advisers: Dr. Bart Duff, Associate Agricultural Economist at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Dr. Tirso B. Paris, Jr., Chairman and Assistant Professor, College of Development Economics and Management (CDEM), University of the Philippines at Los Bafios (UPLB) , and Dr. Corazon T. Aragon, College Secretary and Assistant Professor, CDEM, UPLB for their constructive criticism and guidance in the preparation of this thesis. Similar gratitude and appreciation are also extended to Dr. Paul G. Webster, Visiting Agricultural Economist at IRRI, Dr. John A. Wicks, Associate Agricultural Economist at IRRI and Dr. Hans P. Binswanger, former Agricultural Development Council (ADC) Associate for India, for their valuable help in clearing important details of the methodol~gyof the thesis. To the Integrated Agricultural Productivity and Marketing Project for providing a fellowship to pursue a Master's degree in Agricultural Economics at UPLB. To the International Rice Research Institute for providing a partial thesis support. Warm thanks to my roommates, Jerome and Precee, for their good company and help in the preparation of the data used in this thesis. To the Section's programmers, Murphy, Edith and Alice, who helped in the processing of the data, our secretaries, Lydia and Hedda for their excellent typing job and my col- leagues at the Economics section of the Agricultural Depart- ment, Fleur, Rigs, Mely, Bardz and Cellie, who made my short stay at IRRI fruitful and enjoyable. To Meyra, Puring and the rest of my classmates for sharing with me the hard times and good times of our course works. And lastly, to my parents and brothers, whose love, encouragement and moral support served me inspiration to complete my graduate work. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I INTRODUCTION .................. 1 1.1 Problem .................. 1 1.2 Objectives ................ 3 1.3 Hypothesis ................ 3 II REVIEW OF LITERATURE .............. 6 2.1 History of the Growth of Farm Mechanization in the Philippines ............ 6 2.2 Related Literature on Production Effects of Mechanization ............. 8 2.3 Survey of the Literature on Decomposition Analysis ................. 11 I11 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .............. 17 3.1 Decomposition Model I (Arithmetic Decomposition Technique) ... 17 3.2 Decomposition Model I1 (Employing the Use of Production Function Framework) ................ 24 3.3 SourceofData ............... 31 3.4 Sampling Procedures ............ 32 IV STUDY AREA AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SAMPLE FARMS . 34 4.1 Study Area ............... 34 4.2 Characteristics of Sample Farms ...... 36 V RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............. 41 5.1 Results of the Arithmetic Decomposition Scheme ................... 41 CHAPTER PAGE 5.2 Results of the Decomposition Scheme Using the Production Function Framework ................ 59 SUMMARY ANDCONCLUSION ............ 70 LITERATURE CITED ... APPENDIX I .................. 76 APPENDIX 11 ................ 80 APPENDIX 111 .................. 82 APPENDIXIV ................. 83 APPENDIX V .................. 84 LIST OF TABLES TABLES PAGE Distribution of Sample Farms by Municipality and Barrio, Nueva Ecija, Philippines, 1979 ... 35 Distribution of Sample Farms by Type of Power Used in Land Preparation and Irrigation, Nueva Ecija, Philippines, Wet Season, 1979 ...... 37 Demographic Characteristics of Sample Farms by Type of Mechanization, Nueva Ecija, Philippines, Wet Season, 1979 ............... 3 8 Characteristicq of Sample Farms by Type of Mecha- nization, Nuevn Ecija, Philippines, Wet Season, 1979...... ............... 39 Test for Differences of Variables Between Tractor and Carabao Farms Using the Kruskal-Wallis One- Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks ....... 42 Means of Var.iables Used in Applying the Arith- metic Decomposition Analysis, Wet Season, 1979 and Dry S'eason, 1980 ............. 44 Decomposition Analysis (Without Interaction Terms) of Output Differences Between 2-wheel Tractor and Carabao Farms .......... 45 Decomposition Analysis (Without Interaction Te~rns)of Output Differences Between 2-wheel Tractor and Carabao Farms with Price Variable . 45 Decomposition Analysis (With Interaction Terms) of Output Differences Between 2-wheel Tractor and Carabao Farms ............... 46 Decomposition Analysis (with Interaction Terms) of Output Differences Between 2-wheel Tractor and Carabao Farms with Price Variable ..... 4 7 Decomposition Analysis (Without Interaction Terms) of Outnut Differences Between 2-wheel/ 4-wheel Tractor Combination and Carabao Farms 5 1 TABLE PAGE 12 Decomposition Analysis (Without Interaction Terms) of Output Differences Between 2-wheel/ 4-wheel Tractor Combination and Carabao Farms with Price Variable ............ 51 Decomposition Analysis (With '~nteractionTerms) of Output Differences Between 2-wheel/4-wheel Tractor Combination and Carabao Farms .... 52 Decomposition Analysis (With Interaction Terms) of Output Differences Between 2-wheel/4-wheel Tractor Combination and Carabao Farms with Price Variable ...................53 Cropping Intensity of Sample Farms by Type of Power Used in Land Preparation and Irrigation, Wet Season, 1979, Dry Season, 1980 ...... 56 Cropping Intensity of Sample Farms by Type of Power Used in Land Preparation and Irrigation, Wet Season, 1979, Dry Season, 1980 ...... 58 Estimated Coefficients of the Cobb-Douglas Production Function for the 2-wheel Tractor Farms.............. ...... 60 Estimated Coefficients of the Cobb-Douglas Production Function for the Carabao Farms ...61 Estimated Coefficients of the Cobb-Douglas Production Function for the 2-wheel/4-wheel Tractor Combinat ion Farms ...........62 Test for Structural Differences in the Produc- tion Functions for 2-wheel Tractor and Carabao Farms Using the Dummy Variable Approach ... 65 Means of Variables Used in Applying the Decom- position Analysis Using the Production Function Framework, Wet Season, 1979. ......... 67 Decomposition Analysis of Per Hectare Yield Differences Between 2-wheel Tractor and Carabao Farms .................... 68 APPENDICES APPENDIX PAGE I Mathematical Identities ........... 1. Identity I ................ 2 . Identity I1 ............... 3 . Identity 111 .............. I I The Kruskal-Wallis Test ........... I11 Mathematical Transformation ......... I V Nitrogen Content of Organic and Commercial Fertilizers ........... V The Chow's Test .............. ABSTRACT TAN, YOLANDA L., University of the Philippines at Los Bafios, March 1981. The Impact of Farm Mechanization on Small- scale Rice Production. Thesis adviser: Dr. Bart Duff. The objective of this study is to quantitatively assess the impact of farm mechanization on output. Production effects of mechanization were evaluated through the use of decomposition analyses. First, an arithmetic decomposition analysis was employed to disaggregate output differences between mechanized and non-mechanized farms into its component elements, i.e., , . yield, price, area and cropping intensity component plus the interactions of these components. Results of the analysis showed that the most important factors that brought about output differences between the mechar~izedand non-mechanized farms were cropping intensity and yield. Secondly, yield effect of mechanization was investigated by using another decomposition technique employing a production function framework. The model decomposed total yield differences between the mechanized and nan-mechanized farms into
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Agricultural Mechanization Framework for Africa
    African Union SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION A FRAMEWORK FOR AFRICA FAO_SAMA Report_Cover.indd 1 17/9/18 11:30 AM FAO_SAMA Report_Cover.indd 4 19/9/18 10:06 AM SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION A Framework for Africa Edited by: Patrick Kormawa Geoffrey Mrema Nomathemba Mhlanga Mark Kofi Fynn Josef Kienzle Joseph Mpagalile Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the African Union Commission Addis Ababa, 2018 FAO_SAMA Report_Contents and Intro.indd 1 17/9/18 11:27 AM Required citation Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed FAO & AUC. 2018. Sustainable Agricultural Mechanization: A Framework and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is for Africa. Addis Ababa. 127pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO appropriately cited. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The The designations employed and the presentation of material in use of the FAO logo is not permitted. If the work is adapted, then it must this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion be licensed under the same or equivalent Creative Commons license. If a whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of translation of this work is created, it must include the following disclaimer the United Nations (FAO) or Africa Union Commission concerning along with the required citation: “This translation was not created by the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Mechanization and Agricultural Transformation
    www.acetforafrica.org Agricultural Mechanization and Agricultural Transformation Paper written by Xinshen Diao, Jed Silver and Hiroyuki Takeshima INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE BACKGROUND PAPER FOR African Transformation Report 2016: Transforming Africa’s Agriculture FEBRUARY 2016 Joint research between: African Center for Economic Transformation (ACET) and Japan International Cooperation Agency Research institute (JICA-RI) Background Paper for African Transformation Report 2016: Transforming Africa’s Agriculture Agricultural Mechanization and Agricultural Transformation Xinshen Diao, Jed Silver and Hiroyuki Takeshima (International Food Policy Research Institute) February 2016 Joint research between African Center for Economic Transformation (ACET) and Japan International Cooperation Agency Research institute (JICA-RI) Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Definitions and Concepts ....................................................................................................................... 6 Definitions of Mechanization ............................................................................................................... 6 Mechanization and Agricultural Intensification ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technology, Labor, and Mechanized Bodies in Victorian Culture
    Syracuse University SURFACE English - Dissertations College of Arts and Sciences 12-2012 The Body Machinic: Technology, Labor, and Mechanized Bodies in Victorian Culture Jessica Kuskey Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/eng_etd Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Kuskey, Jessica, "The Body Machinic: Technology, Labor, and Mechanized Bodies in Victorian Culture" (2012). English - Dissertations. 62. https://surface.syr.edu/eng_etd/62 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in English - Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT While recent scholarship focuses on the fluidity or dissolution of the boundary between body and machine, “The Body Machinic” historicizes the emergence of the categories of “human” and “mechanical” labor. Beginning with nineteenth-century debates about the mechanized labor process, these categories became defined in opposition to each other, providing the ideological foundation for a dichotomy that continues to structure thinking about our relation to technology. These perspectives are polarized into technophobic fears of dehumanization and machines “taking over,” or technological determinist celebrations of new technologies as improvements to human life, offering the tempting promise of maximizing human efficiency. “The Body Machinic” argues that both sides to this dichotomy function to mask the ways the apparent body-machine relation is always the product of human social relations that become embedded in the technologies of the labor process. Chapter 1 identifies the emergence of this dichotomy in the 1830s “Factory Question” debates: while critics of the factory system described workers as tools appended to monstrous, living machines, apologists claimed large-scale industrial machinery relieved human toil by replicating the laboring body in structure and function.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanization and Automation by the Manufacturing of Removable Modular Buildings
    Mechanization and Automation by the Manufacturing of Removable Modular Buildings Frans van Gassel Eindhoven University of Technology, Faculty of Building and Architecture, P.O. BOX 513, NL 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands. ABSTRACT During the last ten years Removable Modular Building Systems in the Netherlands have made remarkable progress by using mechanization and automation. These are not the only techniques, as logistic techniques, design according to a modular system and standardization of joints, are also used. An interesting question is what designers of permanent buildings and building processes can learn from these techniques. To get insight into the manufacturing of Removable Modular Buildings this system has been described. The problems related to the production of permanent buildings are mentioned too. The answer to the question: "What can we learn about mechanization and automation by the production of Removable Modular Buildings for the construction of permanent buildings?", is: - Reducing the construction processes on the site to simple transport and assembly processes allows mechanization and robotization to become less complex. - It is possibly to develop components with standard joints (design by construction). - All information about the product and its production process can be stored in one data-base. 1. INTRODUCTION The Advisory Committee for Technological Policy in the Building Industry (Adviesraad Technologiebeleid Bouwnijverheid ARTB) predicts two strategies for the coming years in its publication Building Outlook for 2010 (Bouwvisie 2010): - Optional standardization: to standardize industrially manufactured, not project-depend vent, components to make individual buildings. - Flexible production organization: to manufacture standardized components with a series of one piece [1]. -1019- 13th ISARC The manufacturing of Removable Modular Buildings in the Netherlands already involved these strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • 313. Farm Power in Senegal.Docx
    Invited paper presented at the 6th African Conference of Agricultural Economists, September 23-26, 2019, Abuja, Nigeria Copyright 2019 by [authors]. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. Farm power transition and access in Senegal: Patterns and constraints Getaw Tadessea, Anatole Goundanb and Saer Sarrc aAfrica Region, International Food Policy Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia bAfrica region, International Food Policy Research Institute, Dakar, Senegal c Macroeconomic Analysis Office of the Senegalese Institute for Agricultural Research Abstract This paper aims at documenting evidences on the patterns and constraints affecting the sequential and simultaneous transition of farm power use from manual to animal to engine. It also aims at exploring access to farm equipment through ownership and rental service. Based on a household data collected under the huge and ambitious project called ‘Senegal Agricultural Policy Project’, the result generally confirms the very low use of farm machinery powered by engines despite years of efforts to support agricultural mechanization programs. However, the use of improved farm equipment powered by animals has shown a sharp increase overtime. The study further demonstrated the variation of constraints in farm mechanization transitions defined by sources of power. While demand side constraints such as farm size and off-farm income are more important for machineries than animal plows, supply-side constraints such as rental overhead costs and membership to a producer’s organization are very critical for transition to engine power through facilitating rental service which is the dominant source of access to heavy machineries.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Mechanization in Selected Manufacturing Industries
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Mechanization in Industry Volume Author/Editor: Harry Jerome Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-026-4 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/jero34-1 Publication Date: 1934 Chapter Title: Changes in Mechanization in Selected Manufacturing Industries Chapter Author: Harry Jerome Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5242 Chapter pages in book: (p. 55 - 119) CHAPTER III CHANGES IN MECHANIZATION IN SELECTED MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES EVEN if full information were available, limitations of space would prevent us from attempting a complete recital of recent changes in technique and equipment in American industry. In the technical books and journals there is a vast volume of literature dealing with such changes, but even it falls short of giving a complete picture. Nevertheless it does appear worth while to present a brief statement of the nature of changes taking place in selected industries, particularly where the changes can be set forth in quantitative terms. Thus we may get a better basis for understanding the gen- eralizations in subsequent chapters concerning the nature, rapidity and effects of changes in mechanization. Accordingly in this chapter we give brief summaries of the labor-saving developments peculiar to the processing operations of selected manufacturing industries. The two following chapters are devoted to similar summaries for non-manufacturing indus- tries and for the handling of materials which is
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanization in Industry
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Mechanization in Industry Volume Author/Editor: Harry Jerome Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-026-4 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/jero34-1 Publication Date: 1934 Chapter Title: Introduction to "Mechanization in Industry" Chapter Author: Frederick C. Mills Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5239 Chapter pages in book: (p. -11 - 2) INTRODUCTION THE machine has been the foremost factor making for eco- nomic and social change in the western world during the past hundred and fifty years. It has impinged upon man's modes of living in diverse ways. The means by which his productive energies have been utilized, and the directipns in which those energies have been expended, have been sub- stantially altered. The productivity of his labor has been increased; his standard of living has been advanced. The physical features of the world in which he works and lives have been changed, and a transformation has occurred in the character of the commodities entering into daily con- sumption and use. After generations of slow change, the skills essential to economic survival have been profoundly modified. Under the pressure of mechanization men have had to learn to do new things in new ways. All this is commonplace enough. That the machine has worked great changes in human life is no discovery of the past few years. For more than a century social observers have commented on the progress of machine industry. All men alert to the currents of social change have known that major shifts in the modes and manners of living were in process.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Factors Affecting the Agricultural Mechanization Level in China Based on Structural Equation Modeling
    sustainability Article Study on Factors Affecting the Agricultural Mechanization Level in China Based on Structural Equation Modeling Wei Li, Xipan Wei, Ruixiang Zhu and Kangquan Guo * College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; [email protected] (W.L.); [email protected] (X.W.); [email protected] (R.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-159-2931-7953 Received: 1 November 2018; Accepted: 17 December 2018; Published: 21 December 2018 Abstract: The subsidy policy for the purchase of agricultural machinery and China’s Agricultural Mechanization Promotion Law have been implemented since 1998 and 2004, respectively. The goal of the policy and the law is to improve the agricultural mechanization level (AML) in China. Policymakers expect that the AML could be increased by improving the agricultural equipment level (AEL). The AML in China is affected by many factors. However, only a few studies have investigated the effects of the AEL on the AML. To fill this gap, we built an integrative conceptual framework and estimated a corresponding structural equation model (SEM) using the relevant data collected from 30 provinces (cities and districts) in mainland China. The relevant data cover the years from 2001 to 2014. There are six factors in our framework, including AEL, level of economic development, land resource endowment, benefit factors, policy and environmental factors, and demographic factors. The results showed that the AEL had the greatest impact on the AML. The level of economic development, the demographic factors, and the benefit factors not only directly affected China’s AML but also indirectly affected the AML through the AEL.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor Market Implications of Structural Transformation in Bangladesh
    Lets get mechanized { labor market implications of structural transformation in Bangladesh Fuad Hassan and Lukas Kornher March 15, 2019 Abstract Bangladesh is experiencing the structural transformation of its economy with increasing employment in the manufacturing sector, particularly the garment industry. At the same time, agricultural ac- tivities become more and more mechanized. These processes have major effects on rural labor markets, and thus on rural livelihoods. This study examines the implications of agricultural mechanization on agricultural wages using a unique data set of monthly wages and rice prices over the period from 1995 to 2015. Employing a dynamic panel model, estimated by generalized methods of moments, we find that increasing agricultural mechanization is associated with an increase in real agricultural wages, both in the short-run and the long-run. Hence, our estimation results dispel the concern that machines are substitutes for manual labor and reduce employment opportunities in rural Bangladesh. This has important implications for policy makers aiming for a reduction of rural poverty and the interventions which reduce extensive rural-urban migration and create more employment opportunity in the agricultural sector. 1 Introduction There still exists a huge productivity gap in agricultural activities between developing and industrialized countries. This productivity gap has several causes (e.g. input use, farming techniques, crop varieties), but can be partly 1 attributed to the lack of mechanization in agriculture. Mechanized agricul- ture usually refers to the use of tractors and other agricultural machinery for land preparation, weeding, and harvesting, but also involves the autom- atization of value chain activities, such as processing, packaging, and other services (FAO, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanization in the Coffee Orchard
    Mechanization in the Coffee Orchard (Some Generalities followed by specific examples) As often told, Coffee is the second largest traded commodity after oil. Estimated 25 million families depend on coffee cultivation and are located between Tropic of Cancer and Capricorn. Maybe 11 million hectares are devoted to coffee cultivation. Labor was always a major factor being solved with slave labor in the historic past. Today many areas offer coffee employment however in some instances it still resembles slave labor conditions, as lack of housing, transportation and lack of social benefits are concerned. Child labor sounds terrible, however many young people want to work and often falsify their papers to be able to earn some money during the coffee harvest. Even today, coffee is still a predominant hand crop. Mechanization is relative new to coffee cultivation and harvesting. Many coffee farms are located in difficult terrain. Mechanization is difficult or impossible in some of these Mountainous areas. Worldwide the trend is to replace hand labor with machinery, no matter what crop involved. There is a trend for coffee cultivation to move from steep mountain areas, into more flat areas such as the Bolaven Plateau in Laos at 1300 meter elevation or the Cerrado Plains in Brazil or the Highlands in PNG or the Atherton Tablelands in Queensland. These locations are all around 1300 meter+ elevation. Excellent coffee growing areas and suitable for mechanization. Hawaii with high labor costs is using machines The most expensive coffee task is harvesting. As a single where possible. Kona due to steep terrain is still using migrant hand labor.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanization, Transportation, and the Location of Industry in Germany 1846-1907
    Mechanization, transportation, and the location of industry in Germany 1846-1907 Theresa Gutberlet Abstract of Dissertation at the University of Arizona Defended on May 2, 2013 June 7, 2013 1Introduction This dissertation investigates the question: why do some regions industrialize and others do not? The large variation in the timing and success of industrialization across countries and across regions within these countries suggests that some places had and still have better conditions for industrial development than others. Debates about this variation in industrial development have identified natural resource endowments, relative factor prices, the quality of political institutions, entrepreneurial attitudes, and agricultural productivity as key factors for industrialization. Allen (2009) argues that the British Industrial Revolution was the result of high wages and cheap coal, which led to investment in labor saving technologies. Clark (2008) proposes changes in the reproductive pattern as the reason for British productivity growth after 1800. Mokyr (2009) and McCloskey (2010) emphasize the role of a radical shift in scientific thinking and its application to business as the explanation for rapid technological progress. Most studies about industrialization focus on the early success ofBritainrelativetocontinentalEu- rope, the United States, and Asia. This dissertation takes a different approach by comparing regional industrial development inside Germany. The motivation for this approach is threefold. German manu- facturers adopted British innovations during the first wave of industrialization in the second half of the 19th century, so the country serves as an example of successful catch-up. I compare the development of regions within Germany because economic conditions and explanatory factors like natural resource endowments often differ considerably across relatively small areas within countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Adoption of Mechanization, Labour Productivity and Household Income: Evidence from Rice Production in Thailand
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Srisompun, Orawan; Athipanyakul, Thanaporn; Somporn Isvilanonda Working Paper The adoption of mechanization, labour productivity and household income: Evidence from rice production in Thailand TVSEP Working Paper, No. WP-016 Provided in Cooperation with: TVSEP - Thailand Vietnam Socio Economic Panel, Leibniz Universität Hannover Suggested Citation: Srisompun, Orawan; Athipanyakul, Thanaporn; Somporn Isvilanonda (2019) : The adoption of mechanization, labour productivity and household income: Evidence from rice production in Thailand, TVSEP Working Paper, No. WP-016, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Thailand Vietnam Socio Economic Panel (TVSEP), Hannover This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/208384 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen
    [Show full text]