Pro Hac Vice) Clayton D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Case 1:13-cv-00336-LEK-BMK Document 92 Filed 06/19/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1332 Joseph P. Guglielmo (pro hac vice) Clayton D. Halunen (pro hac vice) Erin Green Comite (pro hac vice) Melissa Wolchansky (pro hac vice) SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT HALUNEN & ASSOCIATES LAW, LLP 1650 IDS Center, 80 S. 8th Street The Chrysler Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 405 Lexington Avenue, 40th Floor Telephone: (612) 605-4098 New York, NY 10174 Facsimile: (612) 605-4099 Telephone: (212) 223-6444 [email protected] Facsimile: (212) 223-6334 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Michael R. Reese (pro hac vice) Kim E. Richman (pro hac vice) Counsel for Plaintiffs Howerton, REESE RICHMAN LLP Calderon and Pasarell and the 875 Avenue of the Americas, 18th Floor Proposed Class New York, New York 10001 Telephone: (212) 643-0500 [Additional Counsel in Signature Block] Facsimile: (212) 253-4272 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs Martin and Barry and the Proposed Class IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII DENISE HOWERTON, ERIN Civil No. 13-00336 LEK-BMK CALDERON, and RUTH PASARELL, Individually and on Behalf of All Others PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED Similarly Situated, MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT; MEMORANDUM vs. OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION; DECLARATIONS OF GUGLIELMO, CARGILL, INC., HALUNEN AND REESE AND CORRESPONDING EXHIBITS; Defendant. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE [CAPTION CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE] Case 1:13-cv-00336-LEK-BMK Document 92 Filed 06/19/14 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 1333 MOLLY MARTIN and LAUREN Civil No. 14-cv-00218-LEK-BMK BARRY, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. CARGILL, INC., Defendant. PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Plaintiffs Denise Howerton, Erin Calderon, Ruth Pasarell, Molly Martin, and Lauren Barry (“Plaintiffs”) hereby respectfully move the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), for the entry of an Order: (i) granting preliminary approval of the proposed Settlement; (ii) conditionally certifying the Settlement Class for purposes of such settlement and appointing Plaintiffs as representatives for the Settlement Class; (iii) approving Plaintiffs’ selection of Class Counsel; (iv) approving the proposed notice plan; and (v) setting a hearing date for final approval of the Settlement. This Motion is based on the Memorandum of Law, the Declarations of Joseph P. Guglielmo, Clayton D. Halunen, Michael R. Reese, Jeffrey D. Dahl, William P. Ogburn, Stephen Brobeck, corresponding exhibits, the pleading and papers on file in this action, and such oral and documentary evidence as may be 1 Case 1:13-cv-00336-LEK-BMK Document 92 Filed 06/19/14 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 1334 presented at the hearing on this Motion. The hearing on this Motion is presently set for July 21, 2014 at 9:45 a.m. in the Courtroom of the Honorable Leslie E. Kobayashi, United States District Judge, at the United States District Court, District of Hawaii, 300 Ala Moana Blvd C-338, Honolulu, Hawaii. ECF No. 85. DATED: June 19, 2014 SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP /s/ Joseph P. Guglielmo Joseph P. Guglielmo (pro hac vice) Erin Green Comite (pro hac vice) The Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10174 Telephone: (212) 223-6444 Facsimile: (212) 223-6334 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs Howerton, Calderon and Pasarell and the Proposed Class HALUNEN & ASSOCIATES /s/ Melissa Wolchansky Clayton D. Halunen (pro hac vice) Melissa Wolchansky (pro hac vice) 1650 IDS Center 80 S 8th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 605-4098 Facsimile: (612) 605-4099 [email protected] [email protected] 2 Case 1:13-cv-00336-LEK-BMK Document 92 Filed 06/19/14 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 1335 REESE RICHMAN LLP /s/ Michael R. Reese Michael R. Reese (pro hac vice) Kim E. Richman (pro hac vice) 875 Avenue of the Americas, 18th Floor New York, New York 10001 Telephone: (212) 643-0500 Facsimile: (212) 253-4272 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs Martin and Barry and the Proposed Class Lawrence W. Cohn Attorney at Law 75-109 Lolo Lane Kailua Kona, HI 96740 Telephone: (808) 324-1611 Facsimile: (808) 322-6168 [email protected] E. Kirk Wood WOOD LAW FIRM, LLC P. O. Box 382434 Birmingham, Alabama 35238-2434 Telephone: (205) 908-4906 Facsimile: (866) 747-3905 [email protected] Greg L. Davis DAVIS & TALIAFERRO 7031 Halcyon Park Drive Montgomery, AL 36117 Telephone: 334-832-9080 Facsimile: 334-409-7001 [email protected] Additional Counsel for Plaintiff Howerton 3 Case 1:13-cv-00336-LEK-BMK Document 92 Filed 06/19/14 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 1336 Jared H. Beck BECK & LEE TRIAL LAWYERS 66 West Flagler Street, Suite 1000 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone: (305) 789-0072 Facsimile: (786) 664-3334 [email protected] Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs Howerton and Pasarell Stanley D. Saltzman Marcus J. Bradley William A. Baird MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP 29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208 Agoura Hills, CA 91301 Telephone: (818) 991-8080 Facsimile: (818) 991-8081 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Additional Counsel for Plaintiff Calderon BICKERTON LEE DANG & SULLIVAN LLP James J. Bickerton 745 Fort Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Telephone: (808) 599-3811 Facsimile: (808) 533-2467 [email protected] Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs Martin and Barry 4 Case 1:13-cv-00336-LEK-BMK Document 92-1 Filed 06/19/14 Page 1 of 56 PageID #: 1337 Joseph P. Guglielmo (pro hac vice) Clayton D. Halunen (pro hac vice) Erin Green Comite (pro hac vice) Melissa Wolchansky (pro hac vice) SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT HALUNEN & ASSOCIATES LAW, LLP 1650 IDS Center, 80 S. 8th Street The Chrysler Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 405 Lexington Avenue, 40th Floor Telephone: (612) 605-4098 New York, NY 10174 Facsimile: (612) 605-4099 Telephone: (212) 223-6444 [email protected] Facsimile: (212) 223-6334 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Michael R. Reese (pro hac vice) Kim E. Richman (pro hac vice) Counsel for Plaintiffs Howerton, REESE RICHMAN LLP Calderon and Pasarell and the 875 Avenue of the Americas, 18th Floor Proposed Class New York, New York 10001 Telephone: (212) 643-0500 [Additional Counsel in Signature Block] Facsimile: (212) 253-4272 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs Martin and Barry and the Proposed Class IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII DENISE HOWERTON, ERIN Civil No. 13-00336 LEK-BMK CALDERON, and RUTH PASARELL, Individually and on Behalf of All Others MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN Similarly Situated, SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR Plaintiffs, PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF vs. CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CARGILL, INC., Defendant. [CAPTION CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE] Case 1:13-cv-00336-LEK-BMK Document 92-1 Filed 06/19/14 Page 2 of 56 PageID #: 1338 MOLLY MARTIN and LAUREN Civil No. 14-cv-00218-LEK-BMK BARRY, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. CARGILL, INC., Defendant. Case 1:13-cv-00336-LEK-BMK Document 92-1 Filed 06/19/14 Page 3 of 56 PageID #: 1339 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .....................................................................1 II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ............................................... 3 A. Summary of Plaintiffs’ Claims .............................................................. 3 B. Procedural History .................................................................................5 C. Plaintiffs’ Pre-Complaint Due Diligence ............................................10 D. Plaintiffs Martin and Barry’s Initial Settlement Negotiations ............10 E. Plaintiffs’ Counsel Work Together to Reach the Proposed Settlement ............................................................................11 III. THE TERMS OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT ..................................12 A. Cargill Must Pay a Substantial Sum into a Fund to Compensate Those Harmed by Its Allegedly Deceptive Labeling ..........................13 B. Cargill Must Change Its Business Practices So As To Be Truthful in Labeling the Truvia Consumer Products ..........................14 C. Cargill Agrees to Class Certification for Settlement Purposes Only ......................................................................................16 D. Cargill Will Pay Plaintiffs’ Incentive Awards and Court-Awarded Attorneys’ Fees and Litigation Costs ........................17 IV. THE COURT SHOULD PRELIMINARY APPROVE THE SETTLEMENT .....................................................................................17 A. Legal Standard .....................................................................................18 B. The Factors Weigh in Favor of Granting Preliminary Approval ........20 1. The Settlement Is the Result of Arm’s-Length Negotiations ......20 2. The Strength of Plaintiffs’ Case and Risk, Expense, Complexity, and Likely Duration of Further Litigation ..............22 3. The Risk of Maintaining Class Action Status through Trial .......24 4. The Amount Offered in Settlement .............................................25 5. The Stage of the Proceedings ......................................................27 6. The Experience and Views of Counsel .......................................28 7. The Presence of a Governmental Participant ..............................29