Arxiv:2109.00850V1 [Math.AG] 2 Sep 2021 § Ncaatrsi Eo(E 1].Antrlqeto Shwt Gener to How Is Question Natural a and Bundles [17])
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TAME PARAHORIC NONABELIAN HODGE CORRESPONDENCE IN POSITIVE CHARACTERISTIC OVER ALGEBRAIC CURVES MAO LI AND HAO SUN Abstract. Let G be a reductive group, and let X be an algebraic curve over an algebraically closed field k with positive characteristic. We prove a version of nonabelian Hodge correspondence for G- local systems over X and G-Higgs bundles over the Frobenius twist X′ with first order poles. To obtain a general statement of the correspondence, we introduce the language of parahoric group schemes to establish the correspondence. 1. Introduction 1.1. Background. Let X be a smooth projective scheme over C. In [18], Simpson constructed a homeomorphism between the moduli space of semistable Higgs bundles on X and the moduli space of representations of fundamental groups of X. This correspondence between local systems and Higgs bundles is analytic in nature, it does not preserve the algebraic structure. On the other hand, the work of [14] and [7] shows that the connection between Higgs bundles and local systems is much closer in prime characteristics. The main results of [7] shows that for a smooth projective curve X over an algebraically closed field k of positive characteristic, the stack of local systems on X is a twisted version of the stack of Higgs bundles on X′, the Frobenius twist of X. This result is a crucial ingredient in the proof of the geometric Langlands conjecture in positive characteristic on curves [8]. The Simpson correspondence also works for local systems and Higgs bundles with first order poles in characteristic zero (see [17]). A natural question is how to generalize the correspondence to G-Higgs bundles and G-local systems for reductive groups G (with first order poles). Inspired by C. Simpson’s work [17], people first introduced parabolic G-Higgs bundles and parabolic G-local systems to construct this correspondence. However, the terminology of “parabolic” is not a good choice for constructing the correspondence (see [4]). With a careful discussion of the local data, P. Boalch introduced the language of parahoric subgroups and give a precise statement of the correspondence locally (see [5, §6]). With the help of the local study, people believe that the parahoric language is the correct one to construct the nonabelian Hodge correspondence for G-local systems and G-Higgs bundles with first order poles. In positive characteristic, one may ask a similar question: arXiv:2109.00850v1 [math.AG] 2 Sep 2021 What is the generalization of the main results of [7] to the situation when the G-local systems admits first order poles? In this paper, we establish a general version of the correspondence: tame parahoric nonabelian Hodge correspondence in positive characteristic over curves. The word “tame” has two stories here: (1) First, it means that the poles of local systems or Higgs fields are of first order, which is also called regular singular. C. Simpson studied the nonabelian Hodge correspondence on noncom- pact curves, and showed that tameness is a crucial property to construct the correspondence, which is closely related to regular singular connections (see [17]). (2) Secondly, since we work in positive characteristic, it is related to the concept of tamely ramified coverings. In characteristic zero, V. Balaji and C. Seshadri found that parahoric torsors over X correspond to Γ-equivariant bundles over Y , where Y → X is a Galois covering with Galois ∗Key words: parahoric group scheme, nonabelian Hodge correspondence †MSC2020 Class: 14D20, 14C30, 20G15, 14L15 1 2 MAO LI AND HAO SUN group Γ [3]. When generalizing this approach to positive characteristic p, we suppose that the order of Γ and p are coprime, which means that the covering Y → X is tamely ramified. Furthermore, this also implies that the stack [Y/Γ] is tame [1]. This problem has been investigated in [16] for local systems with nilpotent residuals, and compared with this work, we do not impose any condition on the residual of the connections. Also, some of the investigations are motivated by the results in [5], especially in the local case. 1.2. Main Results. 1.2.1. Local Case. Let k be an algebraically closed field. Let G be a connected reductive linear algebraic group over k. Let O := k[[z]] and K := k((z)). A parahoric (sub)group is usually understood as a subgroup of G(K) (see [6, 15]). In characteristic zero, given a (rational) weight θ of G, P. Boalch constructed a special parahoric group Pθ(O) ⊆ G(K) to study the tame Riemann-Hilbert correspondence locally [5]. As a special case, when θ = 0, then Pθ(O) is exactly G(O), which goes back to the case of G-bundles. We first study this problem locally on a formal disc D := Spf(O) with θ = 0. In this case, a tame parahoric Pθ(O)-connection is exactly a G-connection with first order pole (or a tame G-connection) over D, i.e. dz d + A , A = a zi ∈ g(O), z X i i≥0 and a tame parahoric Pθ(O)-Higgs field is a tame G-Higgs field over D. Fixing a splitting of the Lie algebra π : tFp ֒→ t, we can decompose a0 as a0 = s + n = τ + σ + n, where s (resp. n) is the semisimple part (resp. nilpotent part) of a0, and τ ∈ tFp is the rational part of s, while σ is the irrational part of s. By generalizing a classical calculation to positive characteristic, dz i a tame G-connection is equivalent to a G-connection d + B z , where B = Pi≥0 biz , under the Gauge action such that bi lies in the generalied eigenspace of the operator [b0, −] with eigenvalue i (see dz Lemma 4.2). Therefore, we can assume that given a tame G-connection d + A z , the term ai lies in the generalized eigenspace of the operator tor [τ, −] with eigenvalue i. tame We first consider the case that the semisimple part of a0 is irrational, i.e. τ = 0. Let LocsysG,irr(D) dz be the category of tame G-local systems A z on the formal disc D such that the semisimple part of tame ′ the residual is irrational. We also define HiggsG,irr(D ) to be the category of tame G-Higgs bundles on the Frobenius twist of D such that the semisimple part of the residual is irrational. We prove that these two categories are equivalent (Proposition 4.7) tame ∼ tame ′ LocsysG,irr(D) = HiggsG,irr(D ). tame Then, if the rational part τ of a0 is nontrivial, define the category LocsysG,τ (D) similarly. We prove tame ′ ′ that this category is equivalent to the category Higgs ′ (D ) of tame parahoric G (O)-Higgs bundles Gτ ,irr τ over D′, of which the residual is irrational (Proposition 4.10), i.e. tame tame ′ Locsys (D) ∼ Higgs ′ (D ). G,τ = Gτ ,irr ′ ′ Note that the group Gτ (O) can be understood as a parahoric subgroup over D defined by a weight corresponding to τ (Lemma 4.8). This finishes the discussion of local tame G-nonabelian Hodge corre- spondence. Next, we come to the parahoric case over D. We fix a rational weight θ, of which the denominator is d. Similar to the above discussion, we define two categories: tame D D • LocsysPθ ,τ ( ) is the category of tame parahoric Pθ(O)-connections on with rational semisim- ple residual τ; TAMEPARAHORICNONABELIANHODGECORRESPONDENCE 3 tame ′ ′ ′ • Higgs ′ (D ) is the category of tame parahoric G (O)-Higgs bundles on D with irra- Gθ+τ ,irr θ+τ tional semisimple residual. The following diagram tame D Proposition 3.9 tame D LocsysPθ ,τ ( x) LocsysG,θ+τ ([ y/Γ]) Proposition 4.10 tame ′ tame ′ Higgs ′ (D ) Higgs ′ ([D /Γ]) Gθ+τ ,irr x Theorem 3.7 Gθ+τ ,irr y implies the equivalence of these two categories. Actually, each arrow in the diagram can be understood as an equivalence and the horizontal arrows are discussed in § 3 based the the correspondence studied by V. Balaji and C. Seshadri [3]. Theorem 1.1 (local tame parahoric nonabelian Hodge correspondence, Theorem 4.15). We have tame tame ′ Locsys (D) =∼ Higgs ′ (D ), Pθ,τ Gθ+τ ,irr Moreover, the p-curvature of the parahoric Pθ(O)-connection is zero if and only if the corresponding ′ parahoric Gθ+τ (O)-Higgs bundle has zero Higgs field. 1.2.2. Global Case. After the local description of tame parahoric nonabelian Hodge correspondence, we move to the global case, and we still consider the case θ = 0 first. Let X be a smooth algebraic ′ curve with a given reduced effective divisor D. Let L := ΩX (D). Denote by L the corresponding line bundle over X′, which is the Frobenius twist of X, and we have F r∗L ′ =∼ L p, where F r : X → X′ is ′ the Frobenius morphism. Let BL ′ be the L -twisted Hitchin base. Then, we have a natural morphism tame hp : LocsysG → BL ′ , which is called p-Hitchin morphism (see [7, Proposition 3.1] or Corollary 5.4). The p-Hitchin morphism p helps us to construct a group schemes J over X × BL ′ equipped with a natural action tame tame tame LocsysJp ×BL ′ LocsysG → LocsysG . tame Now we define a substack A ⊆ LocsysJp , of which the connections are with vanishing p-curvature, and let X be the stack that parameterizes (E, ∇, Ψ) such that • (E, ∇) is a tame G-connection with zero p-curvature, • Ψ is a horizontal section of Ad(E) ⊗ F r∗L ′ Clearly, X is an algebraic stack over BL ′ . B ′ ′ 0 ′ ′ In the meantime, we can construct a vector bundle L over BL , of which the fiber is H (X , Lie(Jb′ )⊗ tame L ′ ′ ′ B ′ ) for each b ∈ BL .