DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Species Selected on the Basis of a New Or Increased Export Quota in 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Review of species selected on the basis of a new or increased export quota in 2009 (Version edited for public release) Prepared for the European Commission Directorate General E - Environment ENV.E.2. – Development and Environment by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre May, 2009 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring PREPARED FOR Centre 219 Huntingdon Road The European Commission, Brussels, Belgium Cambridge CB3 0DL DISCLAIMER United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 The contents of this report do not necessarily Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 reflect the views or policies of UNEP or Email: [email protected] contributory organisations. The designations Website: www.unep-wcmc.org employed and the presentations do not imply ABOUT UNEP-WORLD CONSERVATION the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on MONITORING CENTRE the part of UNEP, the European Commission or contributory organisations concerning the The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring legal status of any country, territory, city or Centre (UNEP-WCMC), based in Cambridge, area or its authority, or concerning the UK, is the specialist biodiversity information delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. and assessment centre of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), run cooperatively with WCMC 2000, a UK charity. © Copyright: 2009, European Commission The Centre's mission is to evaluate and highlight the many values of biodiversity and put authoritative biodiversity knowledge at the centre of decision-making. Through the analysis and synthesis of global biodiversity knowledge the Centre provides authoritative, strategic and timely information for conventions, countries and organisations to use in the development and implementation of their policies and decisions. The UNEP-WCMC provides objective and scientifically rigorous procedures and services. These include ecosystem assessments, support for the implementation of environmental agreements, global and regional biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and the development of future scenarios. CITATION UNEP-WCMC. 2009. Review of species selected on the basis of a new or increased export quota in 2009. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 2. Update since SRG 47 .......................................................................................................... 4 3. Species reviews ................................................................................................................... 5 SPECIES: Cordylus regius ................................................................................................... 5 SPECIES: Euphyllia ancora .................................................................................................. 7 SPECIES: Galaxea astreata ................................................................................................. 14 SPECIES: Heliopora coerulea ............................................................................................. 22 SPECIES: Pectinia lactuca .................................................................................................. 30 3 1. Introduction Export quotas are usually established by each Party to CITES unilaterally, but they can also be set by the Conference of the Parties or result from recommendations of the Animals and Plants Committees. In general, there is no specific requirement in the text of the Convention to establish quotas to limit the trade in CITES-listed species. However, quotas should be established for meat and caviar of Acipenseriformes species from stocks shared between different Range States [Resolution Conf. 12.7 (Rev. CoP14)]. When a country sets its own national export quotas for CITES species, it should inform the Secretariat [see Resolution Conf. 12.3 (Rev. CoP14) ], which in turn informs the Parties. Early in each year, the Secretariat publishes a Notification to the Parties containing a list of export quotas of which it has been informed. Quotas generally relate to a calendar year (1 January to 31 December); however, since 2008 sturgeon quotas have related to a quota year (1 March to 28 February). The CITES export quotas for sturgeon were initially published on the CITES website ( www.cites.org ) on 02/03/2009. Quotas for other species were initially published on 04/03/2009 and were updated on 10/03/2009, 03/04/2009, 09/04/2009 and 04/05/2009. Based on the quotas that were available on 11/03/2009, UNEP-WCMC analysed the 2009 CITES export quotas to identify: a) Quotas that were newly established in 2009; b) Quotas that increased or decreased in 2009 compared with 2008 quotas. This analysis was presented at the 47th Meeting of the SRG on 12/03/2009. Five species/country combinations were selected for review where the new or increased quota in 2009 indicated that further discussion might be necessary to determine whether the trade would have a harmful effect on the conservation status of the species or on the extent of the territory occupied by the relevant population of the species. These were: • Cordylus regius /Mozambique: New quota of 500 live specimens. Mozambique is not a known range State of this species. • Euphyllia ancora / Indonesia: Quota increased from 28,800 to 32,000 wild-taken pieces. Globally Vulnerable. • Galaxea astreata / Indonesia: Quota increased from 5,040 to 5,432 wild-taken pieces. Globally Vulnerable • Heliopora coerulea / Indonesia: Quota increased from 2,250 to 2,425 wild-taken pieces. Globally Vulnerable. • Pectinia lactuca / Indonesia: Quota increased from 2,250 to 2,500 wild-taken pieces. Globally Vulnerable. 1.1. Trade data Trade data included in this report were downloaded from the UNEP-WCMC CITES Trade Database on 16/04/2009. 2. Update since SRG 47 Since the analysis of CITES export quotas was undertaken in March, 2009, additional CITES export quotas have been published on the CITES website. Of particular note were: - Indonesia established 2009 quotas for a number of coral species around 10% higher than the 2008 quotas. - The 2009 Indonesia quota for Cibotium barometz increased by 100% on the 2008 quota, from 450 kg to 900 kg (dry weight, in the form of ‘hairs’, etc.). - The 2009 Indonesia quota for Gonystylus bancanus increased by 35% on the 2008 quota, from 5,909 m 3 to 8,000 m 3. 4 3. Species reviews REVIEW OF SPECIES SELECTED ON THE BASIS OF A NEW OR INCREASED EXPORT QUOTA IN 2009 REPTILIA CORDYLIDAE SPECIES: Cordylus regius SYNONYMS: Cordylus warreni regius COMMON NAMES: Regal Girdled Lizard (English) RANGE STATES: Zimbabwe RANGE STATE UNDER REVIEW: Mozambique IUCN RED LIST: Not evaluated PREVIOUS EC OPINIONS: No previous opinions formed TRADE PATTERNS: Cordylus regius from Mozambique was selected for review on the basis of a new quota of 500 live specimens combined with the fact that Mozambique is not a known range State of this species. No trade in Cordylus regius from Mozambique has been reported. CONSERVATION STATUS in range states C. regius was reported to occur in southeast Mutare District, eastern Zimbabwe (Branch, 1998; Broadley, 2006), where it was reported to inhabit rock outcrops in open savannah (Branch, 1998). Welch (1982) also reported the species’ occurrence in southern Zimbabwe. Mozambique: No evidence was found for the occurrence of C. regius in Mozambique. Mozambique is not listed as a range State for C. regius in the CITES standard reference for Cordylus (Broadley, 2006). C. regius was reported to be closely related to C. mossambicus , which occurs in the Gorongosa Mountains of Mozambique and in the lower slopes of the Chimanimani Mountains in Zimbabwe (Branch, 1998). Breeding males of both species were described as having blackish backs with bright orange to yellow flanks, and females were described as having dark brown backs with C. regius having yellowish brown flanks and C. mossambicus having grey brown flanks (Branch, 1998) – hence their appearance is similar. C. mossambicus was also reported to closely resemble C. regius on Le Monde des Cordylus (2006). 5 Mozambique has had an annual quota of 500 live C. mossambicus between 2003 and 2008, which increased to 1500 in 2009. Imports of this species to the EU from Mozambique have been suspended since 2006, following a negative opinion formed in 2004. Imports to the EU from Mozambique of two other species of Cordylus , C. tropidosternum and C. vittifer, are also suspended. REFERENCES: Branch, B. 1998. Field guide to snakes and other reptiles of southern Africa. Struik Publishers Ltd, Cape Town. Broadley, D. G. 2006. CITES standard reference for the species of Cordylus (Cordylidae, Reptilia) compiled by Donald G. Broadley at the request of the CITES Nomenclature Committee. Update 2006 URL: http://www.cites.org/common/docs/Res/12_11/Cordylus_CoP14_update.pdf Le Monde des Cordylus. 2006. Fiche du Cordylus warreni mossambicus URL: http://cordyles.canalblog.com/archives/fiche_warreni_mossambicus_/index.html Accessed: 5-5- 2009. Welch, K. R. G. 1982. Herpetology of Africa: a checklist and bibliography of the orders Amphisbaenia, Sauria, and Serpentes. RE Krieger Pub. Co., Malabar, Florida. 6 REVIEW OF SPECIES SELECTED ON THE BASIS OF A NEW OR INCREASED EXPORT QUOTA IN 2009 ANTHOZOA CARYOPHYLLIIDAE SPECIES: Euphyllia ancora SYNONYMS: - COMMON NAMES: Anchor Coral (English), Hammer Coral (English) RANGE STATES: Australia (?), British Indian Ocean Territory, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New Caledonia,
Recommended publications
  • What Is Coral Bleaching

    What Is Coral Bleaching

    Mote Marine Laboratory / Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Coral Bleaching Early Warning Network Current Conditions Report #20180727 Updated July 27, 2018 Summary: Based on climate predictions, current conditions, and field observations, the threat for mass coral bleaching within the FKNMS is currently MODERATE. NOAA Coral Reef Watch Current and 60% Probability Coral Bleaching Alert Outlook July 25, 2018 (experimental) June 30, 2015 (experimental) Figure 2. NOAA’s Experimental 5km Coral Bleaching HotSpot Map for Florida July 25, 2018. coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/vs/gauges/florida_keys.php Figure 1. NOAA’s 5 km Experimental Current and 60% Probability Coral Bleaching Alert Outlook Areas through October, 2018. Updated July 25, 2018. coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/vs/gauges/florida_keys.php Weather and Sea Temperatures According to the newly released NOAA Coral Reef Watch (CRW) experimental 5 kilometer (km) Satellite Current and 60% Probability Coral Bleaching Alert Area, most areas of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary are under a bleaching Warning or Alert Level 1, which means bleaching is likely and potential for more bleaching warnings and alerts if sea Figure 3. NOAA’s Experimental 5km Degree Heating temperatures continue to increase in the next few weeks (Fig. 1). Weeks Map for Florida July 25, 2018. coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/vs/gauges/florida_keys.php Recent remote sensing analysis by NOAA’s CRW program indicates that most of the Florida Keys region is currently experiencing thermal stress. NOAA’s 35 new experimental 5 km Coral Bleaching HotSpot Map (Fig. 2), which 30 illustrates current sea surface temperatures compared to the average temperature for the warmest month, shows elevated temperatures for the 25 Florida Keys.
  • Climate Change Impacts on Corals in the UK Overseas Territories of British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) and the Pitcairn Islands

    Climate Change Impacts on Corals in the UK Overseas Territories of British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) and the Pitcairn Islands

    Climate change impacts on corals in the UK Overseas Territories of British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) and the Pitcairn Islands Blue Belt Programme April 2021 Authors: Lincoln, S., Cowburn, B., Howes, E., Birchenough, S.N.R., Pinnegar, J., Dye, S., Buckley, P., Engelhard, G.H. and Townhill, B.L. Issue date: 29 March 2021 © Crown copyright 2020 This information is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications www.cefas.co.uk Document Control Submitted to: Kylie Bamford (UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) Date submitted: 29 March 2021 Project Manager: Victoria Young Report compiled by: Susana Lincoln Quality control by: Georg H. Engelhard Approved by and date: Christopher Darby and Silvana Birchenough, 25 March 2021 Version: Final checked Version Control History Author Date Summary of changes Version Lincoln et al. November 2020 Initial draft V0.1 Lincoln et al. January 2021 External peer review completed V0.2 Lincoln et al. February 2021 QC QA corrections and final draft V1.0 Lincoln et al. February 2021 Comments from Emily Hardman V1.1 (Marine Management Organisation) Lincoln et al. March 2021 Editorial comments from Silvana V2.0 Birchenough et al. Lincoln et al. March 2021 Editorial comments from V2.1 Christopher Darby Lincoln et al. March 2021 All comments addressed Final Lincoln et al. April 2021 Final checks by reviewers prior Checked to publication This report has been reviewed by: Sheppard, C. (University of Warwick, UK), Wabnitz, C.
  • Print This Article

    Print This Article

    Journal of Coastal Development ISSN : 1410-5217 Volume 14, Number 1, October 2010 : 11 - 17 Accredited : 83/Dikti/Kep/2009 Original Paper NATURAL CORAL COLONIZATION OF A MARINA SEAWALL IN SINGAPORE Chou Loke Ming†, NG Chin Soon Lionel‡, Chan Sek Meng Jeremy†, and Seow Liyun Angie† † Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Blk S1, #02-05, Singapore 117543 ‡ Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore, 18 Kent Ridge Road, Blk S2S, Singapore 119227 Received : June, 7, 2010 ; Accepted : July, 26, 2010 ABSTRACT Marinas require extensive modification of a natural coast. The resulting modified habitat is known to support changed biological communities but the ability of tropical marinas to function as a surrogate habitat for scleractinian corals has not been well investigated. An assessment of scleractinian corals naturally colonising a nine-year-old marina seawall in Singapore indicated 26 genera from 13 families, of which Pectinia and Turbinaria were the most dominant. Most colonies measured 10 – 25 cm in diameter. Reefs of adjacent islands provided the larval source while the marina’s environmental conditions favored larval recruitment and growth. Specific larval settlement preferences as well as sediment rejection capabilities of the two most common genera could have contributed to their dominance. The study showed that the seawall of a marina can support scleractinian coral communities and with relevant management, can significantly enhance marine biodiversity. Key words: Scleractinian diversity; seawall; Singapore; tropical marina Correspondence : Tel: +65 65166867 ; Fax: +65 67792486 ; Email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Singapore’s coastline has been heavily modified have also demonstrated that biological by expanding infrastructure development assemblages on artificial marine structures and necessitated by the demands from multiple nearby natural habitats can be different (e.g.
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices

    Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices

    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
  • Catalogue Customer-Product

    Catalogue Customer-Product

    AQUATIC DESIGN CENTRE 26 Zennor Trade Park Balham ¦ London ¦ SW12 0PS Shop Enquiries Tel: 020 7580 6764 Email: [email protected] PLEASE CALL TO CHECK AVAILABILITY ON DAY In Stock Yes/No Marine Invertebrates and Corals Anemones Common name Scientific name Atlantic Anemone Condylactis gigantea Atlantic Anemone - Pink Condylactis gigantea Beadlet Anemone - Red Actinea equina Y Bubble Anemone - Coloured Entacmaea quadricolor Y Bubble Anemone - Common Entacmaea quadricolor Bubble Anemone - Red Entacmaea quadricolor Caribbean Anemone Condylactis spp. Y Carpet Anemone - Coloured Stichodactyla haddoni Carpet Anemone - Common Stichodactyla haddoni Carpet Anemone - Hard Blue Stichodactyla haddoni Carpet Anemone - Hard Common Stichodactyla haddoni Carpet Anemone - Hard Green Stichodactyla haddoni Carpet Anemone - Hard Red Stichodactyla haddoni Carpet Anemone - Hard White Stichodactyla haddoni Carpet Anemone - Mini Maxi Stichodactyla tapetum Carpet Anemone - Soft Blue Stichodactyla gigantea Carpet Anemone - Soft Common Stichodactyla gigantea Carpet Anemone - Soft Green Stichodactyla gigantea Carpet Anemone - Soft Purple Stichodactyla gigantea Carpet Anemone - Soft Red Stichodactyla gigantea Carpet Anemone - Soft White Stichodactyla gigantea Carpet Anemone - Soft Yellow Stichodactyla gigantea Carpet Anemone - Striped Stichodactyla haddoni Carpet Anemone - White Stichodactyla haddoni Curly Q Anemone Bartholomea annulata Flower Anemone - White/Green/Red Epicystis crucifer Malu Anemone - Common Heteractis crispa Malu Anemone - Pink Heteractis
  • Highly Variable Taxa-Specific Coral Bleaching Responses to Thermal

    Highly Variable Taxa-Specific Coral Bleaching Responses to Thermal

    Vol. 648: 135–151, 2020 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published August 27 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13402 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPEN ACCESS Highly variable taxa-specific coral bleaching responses to thermal stresses Timothy R. McClanahan1,*, Emily S. Darling1,2, Joseph M. Maina3, Nyawira A. Muthiga1, Stephanie D’agata1,3, Julien Leblond1, Rohan Arthur4,5, Stacy D. Jupiter1,6, Shaun K. Wilson7,8, Sangeeta Mangubhai1,6, Ali M. Ussi9, Mireille M. M. Guillaume10,11, Austin T. Humphries12,13, Vardhan Patankar14,15, George Shedrawi16,17, Julius Pagu18, Gabriel Grimsditch19 1Wildlife Conservation Society, Marine Program, Bronx, NY 10460, USA 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada 3Faculty of Science and Engineering, Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 4Nature Conservation Foundation, Amritha 1311, 12th Main, Vijaynagar 1st Stage Mysore 570017, India 5Center for Advanced Studies (CEAB), C. d’Acces Cala Sant Francesc, 14, 17300 Blanes, Spain 6Wildlife Conservation Society, Melanesia Program, 11 Ma’afu Street, Suva, Fiji 7Marine Science Program, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, WA 6101, Australia 8Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia 9Department of Natural Sciences, The State University of Zanzibar, Zanzibar, Tanzania 10Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Aviv, Laboratoire BOREA MNHN-SU-UCN-UA-CNRS-IRD EcoFunc, 75005 Paris, France 11Laboratoire d’Excellence
  • Habitat-Forming Deep-Sea Corals in the Northeast Pacific Ocean

    Habitat-Forming Deep-Sea Corals in the Northeast Pacific Ocean

    Habitat-forming deep-sea corals in the Northeast Pacific Ocean Peter Etnoyer1, Lance E. Morgan2 1 Aquanautix Consulting, 3777 Griffith View Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90039, USA ([email protected]) 2 Marine Conservation Biology Institute, 4878 Warm Springs Rd., Glen Ellen, CA 95442, USA Abstract. We define habitat-forming deep-sea corals as those families of octocorals, hexacorals, and stylasterids with species that live deeper than 200 m, with a majority of species exhibiting complex branching morphology and a sufficient size to provide substrata or refugia to associated species. We present 2,649 records (name, geoposition, depth, and data quality) from eleven institutions on eight habitat- forming deep-sea coral families, including octocorals in the families Coralliidae, Isididae, Paragorgiidae and Primnoidae, hexacorals in the families Antipathidae, Oculinidae and Caryophylliidae, and stylasterids in the family Stylasteridae. The data are ranked according to record quality. We compare family range and distribution as predicted by historical records to the family extent as informed by recent collections aboard the National Oceanic of Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office of Ocean Exploration 2002 Gulf of Alaska Seamount Expedition (GOASEX). We present a map of one of these families, the Primnoidae. We find that these habitat-forming families are widespread throughout the Northeast Pacific, save Caryophylliidae (Lophelia sp.) and Oculinidae (Madrepora sp.), which are limited in occurrence. Most coral records fall on the continental shelves, in Alaska, or Hawaii, likely reflecting research effort. The vertical range of these families, based on large samples (N >200), is impressive. Four families have maximum-recorded depths deeper than 1500 m, and minimum depths shallower than 40 m.
  • SEDIMENTARY FRAMEWORK of Lmainland FRINGING REEF DEVELOPMENT, CAPE TRIBULATION AREA

    SEDIMENTARY FRAMEWORK of Lmainland FRINGING REEF DEVELOPMENT, CAPE TRIBULATION AREA

    GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK AUTHORITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM GBRMPA-TM-14 SEDIMENTARY FRAMEWORK OF lMAINLAND FRINGING REEF DEVELOPMENT, CAPE TRIBULATION AREA D.P. JOHNSON and RM.CARTER Department of Geology James Cook University of North Queensland Townsville, Q 4811, Australia DATE November, 1987 SUMMARY Mainland fringing reefs with a diverse coral fauna have developed in the Cape Tribulation area primarily upon coastal sedi- ment bodies such as beach shoals and creek mouth bars. Growth on steep rocky headlands is minor. The reefs have exten- sive sandy beaches to landward, and an irregular outer margin. Typically there is a raised platform of dead nef along the outer edge of the reef, and dead coral columns lie buried under the reef flat. Live coral growth is restricted to the outer reef slope. Seaward of the reefs is a narrow wedge of muddy, terrigenous sediment, which thins offshore. Beach, reef and inner shelf sediments all contain 50% terrigenous material, indicating the reefs have always grown under conditions of heavy terrigenous influx. The relatively shallow lower limit of coral growth (ca 6m below ADD) is typical of reef growth in turbid waters, where decreased light levels inhibit coral growth. Radiocarbon dating of material from surveyed sites confirms the age of the fossil coral columns as 33304110 ybp, indicating that they grew during the late postglacial sea-level high (ca 5500-6500 ybp). The former thriving reef-flat was killed by a post-5500 ybp sea-level fall of ca 1 m. Although this study has not assessed the community structure of the fringing reefs, nor whether changes are presently occur- ring, it is clear the corals present today on the fore-reef slope have always lived under heavy terrigenous influence, and that the fossil reef-flat can be explained as due to the mid-Holocene fall in sea-level.
  • Protection of Coral Reefs and Related Ecosystems for Sustainable Livelihoods and Development – Australian Submission

    Protection of Coral Reefs and Related Ecosystems for Sustainable Livelihoods and Development – Australian Submission

    Secretary-General’s report: Protection of coral reefs and related ecosystems for sustainable livelihoods and development – Australian submission The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 65/150 “Protection of coral reefs for sustainable livelihoods and development” was initiated by Australia working in close partnership with Pacific countries that may be directly affected by the health of coral reefs and related ecosystems. It was adopted by consensus in the UNGA on 25 November 2010, with co-sponsors comprising 84 States from the Pacific, Caribbean, Africa, the Americas, Asia and Europe. The resolution called for urgent action for the protection of coral reefs and related ecosystems. It also requested the United Nations (UN) Secretary-General to prepare a report on the issue. Australia considers this report as a timely opportunity to highlight the social, economic and environmental benefits of protecting coral reefs and related ecosystems and the urgent need for action to address the alarming trend in threats to the world’s coral reefs and related ecosystems. The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (the Rio+20 Conference) will be an important opportunity to secure a strong global outcome for coral reefs and related ecosystems, and recognition of their critical role for securing sustainable livelihoods and development, particularly in small island developing countries. A strong outcome for coral reefs and related ecosystems must be a global response. The main threats to coral reefs and related ecosystems include climate change, catchment runoff, coastal development and under-regulated fishing. For further details see Attachment A . The extent and persistence of damage to coral reef ecosystems will depend on change in the world’s climate and on the resilience of coral reef ecosystems.
  • DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project

    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project

    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1.
  • Guide to the Identification of Precious and Semi-Precious Corals in Commercial Trade

    Guide to the Identification of Precious and Semi-Precious Corals in Commercial Trade

    'l'llA FFIC YvALE ,.._,..---...- guide to the identification of precious and semi-precious corals in commercial trade Ernest W.T. Cooper, Susan J. Torntore, Angela S.M. Leung, Tanya Shadbolt and Carolyn Dawe September 2011 © 2011 World Wildlife Fund and TRAFFIC. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-9693730-3-2 Reproduction and distribution for resale by any means photographic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or information storage and retrieval systems of any parts of this book, illustrations or texts is prohibited without prior written consent from World Wildlife Fund (WWF). Reproduction for CITES enforcement or educational and other non-commercial purposes by CITES Authorities and the CITES Secretariat is authorized without prior written permission, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Any reproduction, in full or in part, of this publication must credit WWF and TRAFFIC North America. The views of the authors expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC network, WWF, or the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The designation of geographical entities in this publication and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF, TRAFFIC, or IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership are held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint program of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Cooper, E.W.T., Torntore, S.J., Leung, A.S.M, Shadbolt, T. and Dawe, C.
  • Response of Fluorescence Morphs of the Mesophotic Coral Euphyllia Paradivisa to Ultra-Violet Radiation

    Response of Fluorescence Morphs of the Mesophotic Coral Euphyllia Paradivisa to Ultra-Violet Radiation

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Response of fuorescence morphs of the mesophotic coral Euphyllia paradivisa to ultra-violet radiation Received: 23 August 2018 Or Ben-Zvi 1,2, Gal Eyal 1,2,3 & Yossi Loya 1 Accepted: 15 March 2019 Euphyllia paradivisa is a strictly mesophotic coral in the reefs of Eilat that displays a striking color Published: xx xx xxxx polymorphism, attributed to fuorescent proteins (FPs). FPs, which are used as visual markers in biomedical research, have been suggested to serve as photoprotectors or as facilitators of photosynthesis in corals due to their ability to transform light. Solar radiation that penetrates the sea includes, among others, both vital photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and ultra-violet radiation (UVR). Both types, at high intensities, are known to have negative efects on corals, ranging from cellular damage to changes in community structure. In the present study, fuorescence morphs of E. paradivisa were used to investigate UVR response in a mesophotic organism and to examine the phenomenon of fuorescence polymorphism. E. paradivisa, although able to survive in high-light environments, displayed several physiological and behavioral responses that indicated severe light and UVR stress. We suggest that high PAR and UVR are potential drivers behind the absence of this coral from shallow reefs. Moreover, we found no signifcant diferences between the diferent fuorescence morphs’ responses and no evidence of either photoprotection or photosynthesis enhancement. We therefore suggest that FPs in mesophotic corals might have a diferent biological role than that previously hypothesized for shallow corals. Te solar radiation that reaches the earth’s surface includes, among others, ultra-violet radiation (UVR; 280– 400 nm) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR; 400–700 nm).