Birds on the Farm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Birds on the Farm Birdson the Farm A Stewardship Guide Written by Erin McGauley Edited by Gregor G. Beck and Anne Bell Spring 2004 1 Introduction – 4 Homestead Areas – 8 Boxes and Tunnels Planting Native Vegetation Ontario Barn Owl Recovery Project Cedar Waxwing Cropland Techniques – 14 Conservation Tillage Voracious Visitors Vesper Sparrow Contents Other Cropland Techniques Crop Rotation Strip Cropping and Grassy Borders Cover Crops Northern Bobwhite Pest Management and Organics – 23 Trends in Pesticide Use Reducing Exposure to Pesticides Integrated Pest Management Agriculture is for the Birds! Birds Can Help Prevent Your Pest Problems Grasslands – 27 Rotational Grazing Pasture and Hayfield Species Haying Loggerhead Shrike Case Study: Rotational Grazing Bobolink Eastern Meadowlark Upland Sandpiper Marginal Farmland – 38 Deciding to Retire Your Land Retired Farmland is for the Birds Brown Thrasher Eastern Towhee Strip Habitat – 43 Strip Habitat is Critical for Birds Strip Cover Design Tips Cowbird Parasitism and Yellow Warblers Strip Cover Specifics highlight Indigo Bunting 2 Eastern Kingbird Woodlands – 49 Interior Forest Habitat Bigger is Better Naturalizing Tree Plantations Scarlet Tanager Red-eyed Vireo Water Resources – 55 If it Isn’t Broken… Buffer Strips Buffers for What? Birds Benefit from Buffers Livestock and Waterways Don’t Mix The Multiple Benefits of Exclusion Exclusion Fencing Contents Alternate Watering Systems Common Yellowthroat American Woodcock Monitoring for Success – 64 Christmas Bird Count Ontario Nest Record Scheme Project FeederWatch Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas Getting Help – Sources of Information – 67 and Assistance 3 Introduction n Southern Ontario, two trends have meant bad news Ifor many species of birds: 1. the countryside is increasing- ly becoming urbanized, and 2. the remaining farmland is being farmed increasingly intensively. “In New England they once For example, between 1966 thought blackbirds useless and 1986, agricultural use of and mischievous to the corn. land declined from 68% to They made efforts to destroy 54% in Southern Ontario as a them. The consequence was, result of urbanization. During the blackbirds were dimin- the same period, the percent- ished; but a kind of worm, age of forest on agricultural which devoured their grass, land dropped from 12% to and which the blackbirds 5.5%. Most counties and used to feed on, increased townships now have less than prodigiously . they wished 15% forest cover, and some again for their blackbirds.” have less than 5% (Riley & Benjamin Franklin, 1749 Mohr, 1994). People who live much of their At the same time, the proportion life outside are very aware of of small family farms declined birds, perhaps more so than any relative to large corporate farms. other life form. We notice the A nation-wide trend, Canadian noisy return of killdeers in the farms are increasing in size and early spring, the clear sweet decreasing in number, with the song of a meadowlark from a average farm size having fence post in the early summer, increased from 50 hectares in or the clamour of gulls follow- 1990 to 250 hectares in the mid- ing the tractor on a warm sum- 1990s (Wildlife Habitat Canada, mer evening. Old timers will tell 2001). you that the birds are different 4 now. The fact is that the num- Larger farms mean less diversi- bers and types of birds around fied farming and more row-crop- us are always changing in ping. As pasture is converted to response to how we use and cropland, sometimes hedgerows manage the land and water. are removed to increase field size, and fields are ploughed to good reasons to do so, some their edges, eliminating grassy economic, some ecological and buffer strips. Equipment is get- some more personal. ting larger, and hedgerows are taken out to facilitate the move- Starting with the more personal ment of equipment between reasons, it is probably fair to say fields. Overall, this trend toward that most people enjoy looking more intensive agriculture is at and listening to birds. It would resulting in a simplified and con- be hard to imagine a silent stantly disturbed landscape, spring, without the chorus of Introduction often more reliant on chemical bird song greeting us when we inputs. Impacts include ground- step out of the house in the water contamination, declining morning. Through their song, surface water quality, and the movement, and comings and degradation and loss of wildlife goings, birds connect us to the habitat. natural world and remind us that According to many researchers, we are part of a living planet. the intensification and special- ization of farms in Ontario is It is up to each of us to ensure contributing to the population that bird populations remain declines of many species of healthy. While the individual birds (Friesen, 1994). For exam- actions of landowners may ple, more than 90% of grass- appear to have little effect on the land birds declined in eastern big picture, collectively their North America between 1966 impact is profound. Hence, as and 1989; two species affected, one small farm after another is the Henslow’s sparrow and log- affected by more intensive agri- gerhead shrike, are now listed cultural practices, we witness as Endangered (Austen et al., declines in entire groups of 1994). Similarly, the clearing of species such as grasslands birds. forests has resulted in declines of forest-dependent species Ironically, when birds disappear such as the whip-poor-will, from the countryside because scarlet tanager and ovenbird the habitat is no longer suitable, (Austen et al., 1994). it is the landowners who may lose out, especially financially. On a farm that is managed con- f we have the ability to sciously to benefit birds, the birds make the landscape worse for themselves can be of consider- Ibirds, then surely we also have able benefit to the farmer. 5 the ability to improve it. And that Consider: is what this guide book is about: improving habitat around the • In Alberta, a pair of savan- farm for birds. There are many nah sparrows (one of the most common breeding areas, there are opportunities to birds in mixed farming improve bird habitat while regions in Ontario) was meeting farm business objec- found to consume over five tives. Modern farming tec- kilograms of insects and spi- niques such as conservation ders during a breeding sea- son. This would amount to about 3.7 kilograms or 149,000 grasshoppers per season. Introduction • In one study, birds removed 64% of over-wintering corn borers in one year and 82% in another year. • In Ohio, white-breasted nuthatch, brown creeper tillage, riparian buffer strips, and downy woodpecker and integrated pest manage- reduce codling moth larvae ment play important roles in by over 90%. enhancing and creating bird- • In pecan groves, a tufted tit- friendly habitat on farms, and mouse was found to eat can result in significant savings 2,100 case bearer larvae, for farmers. Incorporating eco- saving pecan growers an logical management techniques estimated 52,000 nuts. such as those outlined in this • Birds have a strong prefer- book has many benefits for ence for pests: they eat 16 individual landowners, the envi- times more pest insects than ronment and society at large: beneficial insects. • Birds cause 72% mortality • Crop residues left on land of spruce budworm larvae in combination with no-till and pupae. cropping can reduce soil • In one study, evening gros- erosion by 80% and beaks ate 3,036,000 improve water quality. spruce budworms per • Fencerows slow wind speeds square kilometre at one by 15%, lowering associated site and 8,900,000 per erosion rates, saving valuable square kilometre at anoth- top soil and acting as living er. The financial benefits snow fences. were estimated at $1,820 • Shelterbelts can lower 6 per square kilometre (1995 energy needs by 10-30% dollar value). while offering livestock shade in summer and shel- Bird-Friendly Farming ter in the rain and cold. In most intensively farmed • Woodlots can provide fire- wood as well as building At the back of the book you materials, nuts and maple will find a listing of publications syrup to supplement farm and websites where you can income. obtain additional information • Buffer strips protect ground on the featured management and stream water quality techniques. There is also a com- and filter nutrients, particu- prehensive listing of organiza- larly nitrates, from runoff. tions that can provide advice on • Herd health is improved farming and conservation top- when livestock is kept out of ics, including a summary of Introduction waterways. some financial assistance pro- • Enhancing farmland for grams to help offset up-front birds results in better insect costs of implementing ecologi- and rodent control. cal farming methods. What this guide book is about Good land stewardship involves developing an understanding of As a general rule, almost any the birds that use your farm, practice that reduces soil erosion, their habitat needs and the improves water quality, reduces techniques to manage that pesticide use and diversifies habitat for the good of both farming operations will likely birds and the farm. We hope benefit birds (Best, 1990). that this guide book demon- Throughout this guide book, we strates that bird-friendly farm- have highlighted some of the ing and sound farm most readily available ecological management can support and management techniques that benefit each other, and that help protect birds and their habi- together these approaches can tat. Each technique is briefly out- result in economic savings and lined, as are the economic, ecological benefits for farmers. environmental and/or social ben- efits of their implementation. Various bird species that may benefit from your actions are named in the descriptions of the management techniques. In addition, each section features one to three profiles of particu- lar bird species to give you a 7 better idea of the birds that can benefit from the implementa- tion of the management tech- niques described.
Recommended publications
  • Swainson's Thrush
    Swainson’s Thrush Catharus ustulatus Account #: 8365 Species code: SWTH Band size: 1B Skull: 1 Nov (Small windows may remain indefinitely) Pyle: p397 Moult timing Sibley: p407 Moult Formative Definitive Basic 10 primaries (10th reduced) 9 secondaries 12 tail feathers Juvenile plumage is distinctive. Formative and basic plumages are very similar. The absence of moult limits is not easily discerned. Ageing Use moult limits to separate formative plumage from basic plumage. Tail shape may be reliable in some cases, but intermediates occur. P10 length may also be useful. Moult limit Formative Basic Juvenile feathers among the great- er coverts typically have buffy tips. Spots are generally larger on the innermost feathers. Spots become more subtle and may disappear when feathers are worn. Tail Shape Juvenile/Formative Basic The angle of the feather tip differs. Formative = 88° angle Basic = 109° angle Worn feathers may be misleading. Sexing Juvenile Formative Basic No known plumage methods. During the breeding season cloacal protuberance and brood patch are well developed. References: Collier & Wallace 1989, MacGill Bird Observatory, Morris & Bradley 2000, Pyle 1997, Tabular Pyle 2007. Images: David Hodkinson. Compiled by David Hodkinson, 12 December 2011; North American edition General editor: David Hodkinson - [email protected] 8365 Identification Similar species: Hermit Thrush, Grey-cheeked Thrush, Bicknell’s Thrush & Veery. Hermit Thrush Swainson’s Thrush P6 emargination P9 P9 Swainson’s - No emargination Hermit - Emarginated Grey-cheeked - Often emarginated Veery - Slight emargination P6 P6 Wing Formula Hermit: P9 < P6, Swainson’s, Grey-cheeked & Veery: P9 > P6 Hermit Thrush Swainson’s Thrush Back vs Tail colour Swainson’s - No contrast Hermit - Tail colour contrasts with back colour.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermit Thrush (<Em>Catharus Guttatus</Em>) and Veery (<Em>C
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2010 Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) and Veery (C. fuscescens) Breeding Habitat Associations in Southern Appalachian High-Elevation Forests. Andrew J. Laughlin East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Laughlin, Andrew J., "Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) and Veery (C. fuscescens) Breeding Habitat Associations in Southern Appalachian High-Elevation Forests." (2010). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1695. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1695 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) and Veery (C. fuscescens) Breeding Habitat Associations in Southern Appalachian High-Elevation Forests __________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Biological Sciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree Masters of Science in Biological Sciences _________________ by Andrew J. Laughlin May 2010 __________________ Dr. Fred J. Alsop III, Chair Dr. Istvan Karsai Dr. Thomas F. Laughlin Keywords: Birds, Habitat Partitioning, Principal Components Analysis ABSTRACT Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) and Veery (C. fuscescens) Breeding Habitat Associations in Southern Appalachian High-Elevation Forests by Andrew J. Laughlin The Hermit Thrush is a new breeding bird in the Southern Appalachian high-elevation mountains, having expanded its range southward over the last few decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Displays and Their Context in the Painted Bunting
    Wilson Bull., 96(3), 1984, pp. 396-407 VISUAL DISPLAYS AND THEIR CONTEXT IN THE PAINTED BUNTING SCOTT M. LANYON AND CHARLES F. THOMPSON The 12 species in the bunting genus Passerina have proved to be a popular source of material for studies of vocalizations (Rice and Thomp- son 1968; Thompson 1968, 1970, 1972; Shiovitz and Thompson 1970; Forsythe 1974; Payne 1982) migration (Emlen 1967a, b; Emlen et al. 1976) systematics (Sibley and Short 1959; Emlen et al. 1975), and mating systems (Carey and Nolan 1979, Carey 1982). Despite this interest, few detailed descriptions of the behavior of any member of this genus have been published. In this paper we describe aspects of courtship and ter- ritorial behavior of the Painted Bunting (Passerina ciris). STUDY AREA AND METHODS The study was conducted on St. Catherines Island, a barrier island approximately 50 km south of Savannah, Georgia. The 90-ha study area (“Briar Field” Thomas et al. [1978: Fig. 41) on the western side of the island borders extensive salt marshes dominated by cordgrasses (Spartina spp.). The tracts’ evergreen oak forest (Braun 1964:303) consists primarily of oaks (Quercus spp.) and pines (Pinus spp.), with scattered hickories (Carya spp.) and palmettos (Sabal spp. and Serenoe repens) also present. Undergrowth was scanty so that buntings were readily visible when on the ground. As part of a study of mating systems, more than 1800 h were devoted to watching buntings during daily fieldwork in the 1976-1979 breeding seasons. In 1976 and 1977 observations commenced the third week of May, after breeding had begun, and continued until breeding ended in early August.
    [Show full text]
  • Catharus Fuscescens the Veery, Like Most Woodland Thrushes, Is More
    Veery Catharus fuscescens The Veery, like most woodland thrushes, is more frequently heard than seen. Most bird­ ers are familiar with its veer alarm call. Its melodious song, a series of downward­ spiraling notes, rivals that of the Hermit Thrush. Veeries breed throughout Vermont; their range of accepted habitats overlaps that of all other thrushes except the Gray­ cheeked. Although accepting a nearly ubiq­ uitous array of breeding areas, in Connecti­ cut Veeries preferred moist sites (Berlin 1977) and, indeed, few swamps or moist son's thrushes in overlapping territories woodlands in the Northeast are unoccupied (D. P. Kibbe, pers. observ.). by Veeries. However, Vermont's greatest re­ The Veery's bulky nest is built on a thick corded breeding densities for the Veery-64 foundation of dead leaves, usually among to 91 pairs per 100 ha (26 to 37 pairs per saplings or in shrubbery on or near the lOa a)-have been found in habitat com­ ground. Three to 5 pale blue eggs are laid; posed of mixed forest and old fields in cen­ they are incubated for II to 12 days. Twenty­ tral Vermont (Nicholson 1973, 1975, 1978). three Vermont egg dates range from May 26 Dilger (195 6a) found that Veeries preferred to July 23, with a peak in early June. Nest­ disturbed (cutover) forests, presumably lings grow rapidly, and they may leave the because of dense undergrowth there. The nest in as few as 10 days. Nestlings have Veery's acceptance of varied habitat is not been found as early as June 10 and as late surprising in light of its geographic distri­ as July 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Perry County Contact Us the Tell City Ranger District of the Hoosier National Forest Is Open 8-4:30 Monday Through Friday to Serve Visitors
    Birds of Perry County Contact Us The Tell City Ranger District of the Hoosier National Forest is open 8-4:30 Monday through Friday to serve visitors. Tell City Ranger District 248 15th Street Tell City, IN 47586 812-547-7051 Federal relay system for the deaf and hearing impaired: 1-800-877-8339 website: www.fs.usda.gov/hoosier Great Bllue Heron Tufted Titmouse __________________________ vV USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. America’s Great Outdoors Last updated 11/2011 Forest Service United States Department of Agriculture The third and fourth columns are the genus and Using the Checklist species of the bird. The fifth column shows the The first column after the bird’s common name is bird’s status in Indiana as of 2009. (Available at http:// evidence of the bird’s breeding status in our area. www.in.gov/dnr/fishwild/files/Birds_Of_Indiana.pdf) CO = Confirmed breeding evidence FC = Federal Candidate FE = Federal Endangered PR = Probable breeding evidence FT = Federal Threatened SC - State Special Concern PO = Possible breeding evidence SE = State Endangered X = Exotic/Introduced OB = Observed, no breeding evidence Bird abundance will vary seasonally, and often from This shows highest breeding evidence value from year-to-year as well. Actual abundance is often dis- published 1985-1990 breeding bird atlas data and tinct from detectability. Some species may be com- draft 2005-2010 atlas data. (Available at http://www. mon but secretive and only rarely seen. Others may pwrc.usgs.gov/bba/) be numerically sparse, yet highly
    [Show full text]
  • Cedar Waxwings (Bombycilla Cedrorum)
    SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research Veterinary Medicine International Volume 2010, Article ID 818159, 4 pages doi:10.4061/2010/818159 Case Report Feeding Behavior-Related Toxicity due to Nandina domestica in Cedar Waxwings (Bombycilla cedrorum) Moges Woldemeskel and Eloise L. Styer Tifton Veterinary Diagnostic and Investigational Laboratory, Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Georgia, 43 Brighton Road, Tifton, GA 31793, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Moges Woldemeskel, [email protected] Received 12 August 2010; Revised 1 October 2010; Accepted 5 November 2010 Academic Editor: Guillermo Virkel Copyright © 2010 M. Woldemeskel and E. L. Styer. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Dozens of Cedar Waxwings were found dead in Thomas County, Georgia, USA, in April 2009. Five of these were examined grossly and microscopically. Grossly, all the examined birds had pulmonary, mediastinal, and tracheal hemorrhages. Microscopically, several tissues and organs were diffusely congested and hemorrhagic. Congestion and hemorrhage were marked in the lungs. Intact and partly digested berries of Nandina domestica Thunb. were the only ingesta found in the gastrointestinal tract of these birds. Due to their voracious feeding behavior, the birds had eaten toxic doses of N. domestica berries. N. domestica contains cyanide and is one of the few berries readily available at this time of the year in the region. The gross and microscopic findings are consistent with lesions associated with cyanide toxicity. This paper for the first time documents toxicity associated with N.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • L O U I S I a N A
    L O U I S I A N A SPARROWS L O U I S I A N A SPARROWS Written by Bill Fontenot and Richard DeMay Photography by Greg Lavaty and Richard DeMay Designed and Illustrated by Diane K. Baker What is a Sparrow? Generally, sparrows are characterized as New World sparrows belong to the bird small, gray or brown-streaked, conical-billed family Emberizidae. Here in North America, birds that live on or near the ground. The sparrows are divided into 13 genera, which also cryptic blend of gray, white, black, and brown includes the towhees (genus Pipilo), longspurs hues which comprise a typical sparrow’s color (genus Calcarius), juncos (genus Junco), and pattern is the result of tens of thousands of Lark Bunting (genus Calamospiza) – all of sparrow generations living in grassland and which are technically sparrows. Emberizidae is brushland habitats. The triangular or cone- a large family, containing well over 300 species shaped bills inherent to most all sparrow species are perfectly adapted for a life of granivory – of crushing and husking seeds. “Of Louisiana’s 33 recorded sparrows, Sparrows possess well-developed claws on their toes, the evolutionary result of so much time spent on the ground, scratching for seeds only seven species breed here...” through leaf litter and other duff. Additionally, worldwide, 50 of which occur in the United most species incorporate a substantial amount States on a regular basis, and 33 of which have of insect, spider, snail, and other invertebrate been recorded for Louisiana. food items into their diets, especially during Of Louisiana’s 33 recorded sparrows, Opposite page: Bachman Sparrow the spring and summer months.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Bolivar Peninsula
    6?1@<3<96C.?#2;6;@B9. <B@A<;B1B/<;&<062AF DDD5<B@A<;.B1B/<;<?4 How to Use This Book Range Maps: The Range maps are color coded to show where and when to expect each bird to occur. The maps cover ranges of birds living in North America, including the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Each map shows four ranges: orange for summer, blue for win- ter, yellow for migration, and green for year round. Because birds do not stay strictly inside these boundaries, you may find them wandering far from ranges assigned in this guide, par- ticularly during migration. In some cases, a bird may be so rare that its sightings appear as small dots on the map; a bird may be seen in a certain area, and then disappear shortly after it has been spotted. When a bird is so rare that its range cannot be drawn, the map area will read “No Map Available”. Summer Migration Year Round Winter (non breeding) Definitions and Conventions Common Name: Birds are organized by common name, sex or seasonal or age variation, such as Abert’s Towhee Breeding Male, American Robin Female California Gull 1st Winter. The Latin species name, Order, and Family name are located under the common name, for example: Abert’s Towhee Breeding Male Pipilo aberti Order: PASSERIFORMES Family: Sparrows (Emberizidae) Family Name and Color: The top of every page has a unique color bar associated with each family name.) General: The general heading gives an overview of basic identification details. It describes the coloring of the body, any distinctive marks found in the head, tail, and underparts and the coloring differences between sexes and juveniles.
    [Show full text]
  • Aou Alpha Codes for Wayne National Forest Birds 1
    AOU ALPHA CODES FOR WAYNE NATIONAL FOREST BIRDS Species AOU Species AOU Alpha Alpha Code Code Acadian Flycatcher ACFL Dickcissel DICK Alder Flycatcher ALFL Double-crested Cormorant DCCO American Black Duck ABDU Downy Woodpecker DOWO American Coot AMCO Eastern Bluebird EABL American Crow AMCR Eastern Kingbird EAKI American Goldfinch AMGO Eastern Meadowlark EAME American Kestrel MAKE Eastern Phoebe EAPH American Redstart AMRE Eastern Screech Owl EASO American Robin AMRO Eastern Tufted Titmouse ETTI American Woodcock AMWO Eastern Wood-pewee EWPE Bald Eagle BAEA European Starling EUST Baltimore Oriole BAOR Field Sparrow FISP Bank Swallow BANS Golden-winged Warbler GWWA Barn Swallow BARS Grasshopper Sparrow GRSP Barred Owl BAOW Gray Catbird GRCA Bay-breasted Warbler BBWA Great Blue Heron GBHE Belted Kingfisher BEKI Great Crested Flycatcher GCFL Black Vulture BLVU Great Horned Owl GHOW Black-and-white Warbler BAWW Great Horned Owl GHOW Black-billed Cuckoo BBCU Green Heron GRHE Black-capped Chickadee BCCH Hairy Woodpecker HAWO Black-crowned Night-Heron BCNH Henslow’s Sparrow HESP Blackpoll Warbler BLPW Hermit Thrush HETH Black-throated Green Warbler BTNW Hooded Merganser HOME Blue Grosbeak BLGR Hooded Warbler HOWA Blue Jay BLJA Horned Lark HOLA Blue-gray Gnatcatcher BGGN House Finch HOFI Blue-winged Warbler BWWA House Sparrow HOSP Bobolink BOBO House Wren HOWR Broad-winged Hawk BWHA Indigo Bunting INBU Brown Thrasher BRTH Kentucky Warbler KEWA Brown-headed Cowbird BHCO Killdeer KILL Canada Goose CAGO Louisiana Waterthrush LOWA Carolina Chickadee
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationships of the Starlings (Sturnidae: Sturnini) and the Mockingbirds (Sturnidae: Mimini)
    THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE STARLINGS (STURNIDAE: STURNINI) AND THE MOCKINGBIRDS (STURNIDAE: MIMINI) CHARLESG. SIBLEYAND JON E. AHLQUIST Departmentof Biologyand PeabodyMuseum of Natural History,Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 USA ABSTRACT.--OldWorld starlingshave been thought to be related to crowsand their allies, to weaverbirds, or to New World troupials. New World mockingbirdsand thrashershave usually been placed near the thrushesand/or wrens. DNA-DNA hybridization data indi- cated that starlingsand mockingbirdsare more closelyrelated to each other than either is to any other living taxon. Some avian systematistsdoubted this conclusion.Therefore, a more extensiveDNA hybridizationstudy was conducted,and a successfulsearch was made for other evidence of the relationshipbetween starlingsand mockingbirds.The resultssup- port our original conclusionthat the two groupsdiverged from a commonancestor in the late Oligoceneor early Miocene, about 23-28 million yearsago, and that their relationship may be expressedin our passerineclassification, based on DNA comparisons,by placing them as sistertribes in the Family Sturnidae,Superfamily Turdoidea, Parvorder Muscicapae, Suborder Passeres.Their next nearest relatives are the members of the Turdidae, including the typical thrushes,erithacine chats,and muscicapineflycatchers. Received 15 March 1983, acceptedI November1983. STARLINGS are confined to the Old World, dine thrushesinclude Turdus,Catharus, Hylocich- mockingbirdsand thrashersto the New World. la, Zootheraand Myadestes.d) Cinclusis
    [Show full text]
  • Piping Plover Fact Sheet
    WILDLIFE IN CONNECTICUT STATE THREATENED SPECIES PIPING PLOVER Charadrius melodus Background Carolina to Texas and into eastern Mexico and the In the late 1800s, unrestricted market hunting for Caribbean. the millinery (hat) trade devastated the piping plover Description population on the Atlantic Coast. Not only were the feathers used to adorn women’s hats, but the birds were Piping plovers are white below and creamy brown above, also used for human consumption. Following passage of the color of dry sand. During the breeding season, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act in 1918, the piping plover they have a single black neck band that is sometimes population recovered to a 20th century peak in the incomplete and a black bar above the white forehead. 1940s, only to decline again as human development and This black neck band is completely lacking in winter. recreational use greatly intensified in coastal habitats. The primary feathers are dark brown, while the rump is The population decline led to federal Endangered white, contrasting with the brown back and tail, which Species Act protection in 1986 and Connecticut are very conspicuous in the bird’s distraction display. The Endangered Species Act Protection in 1992. bill is orange with a black tip; the feet are also orange. Adult piping plovers typically weigh between 1.5 to 2.25 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recognizes 3 ounces, and measure in length from 6 to 7 inches with a populations of piping plovers – the Atlantic Coast (which wingspan of 14 to 15.25 inches. includes Connecticut), Great Lakes, and Northern Great Plains.
    [Show full text]