DOCSLIB.ORG

REM Factsheet-8-05

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RESOURCE EFFICIENCY MANAGER Factsheet A Strategy for the 21st Century Today The concept of a ResourceResource Effi ciencyciency ManagerManager (REM)(REM) REM Locations A REM program program has great meaning for a 21st centurycentury certain to As of August 2005, the following for a large federal locations are receiving support be beleaguered with increasing site is capable from Resource Effi ciency Managers energy problems such as price (REMs) on a part-time or full-time of generating a spikes, shortages of supplies, basis: typical return on and concerns about disruptions affecting national security.security. The REM Army investment of 300 program created by WashingtonWashington • Fort Lewis (Washington) to 400 percent. State University’sUniversity’s (WSU) Extension • Fort Polk (Louisiana) Energy Program, with funding • Redstone Arsenal (Alabama) under a Federal Energy Management • Fort Campbell (Kentucky) Program (FEMP) grant, is working • Fort Benning (Georgia) to bring additional resourcesresources to the • Fort Sill (Oklahoma) energy programs at federal agencies. Navy Region Northwest REM programs cover nearly 50 federal • Naval Base Kitsap-Bangor sites. • Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton • Naval Air Station Whidbey Island What is a REM? • Naval Base Everett A REM is a designated individual • Naval Undersea Warfare Center contracted by an agency to Keyport support its energy and resourceresource (All in Washington) effi ciencyciency program.program. AA REMREM hashas Navy Region Southwest as his or her sole focus bringing • Naval Station San Diego about reductions in the cost of • Naval Base Coronado energy,energy, water,water, natural gas, fuel oil, refuse • Naval Base Point Loma disposal and any other utilities through • Naval Air Facility El Centro improved practices, greater attention • Naval Air Station Lemoore to utility billings and rate structures, • Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach and the installation and use of • Naval Aviation Depot North Island resourceresource management equipment. • Naval Public Works Center The REM is self motivated, has the San Diego ability to motivate others, can work both • Naval Base Ventura County • Regional Energy Program Offi ce independently and as a member of a team, (All in California) has data collection and analysis skills, has • Naval Air Station Fallon (Nevada) marketing and policy-making experiences, and has the ability to interact with all Navy Region Southeast levels of personnel at the site in order • Naval Air Station Jacksonville to gain support for energy measures. (Florida) They may already be familiar with the site and its staff. What distinguishes REMs Continued on page 2 from energy managers is that they are typically funded from the energy and cost savings they Resource Effi ciency Manager Program: A Strategy for the 21st Century generate. They usually are not headquarters, USDOE’s Western agency staff, but rather are Regional Offi ce, the WSU REM Locations (Continued) considered additional resources. Energy Program, and the Pacifi c Northwest National Laboratory. Naval District Washington History WSU’s Energy Program provides • Indian Head Naval Surface WSU’s REM program was information, training and Warhead Center (Maryland) launched at the U.S. Army’s Fort support necessary to maintain Lewis near Tacoma, Washington, and expand the REM network. Air Force • Headquarters Pacifi c Air Forces in 1997, beginning with support To learn more about the REM (Hawaii) from the U.S. Department of program, visit the WSU Energy Program site, and see our • Hickam Air Force Base (Hawaii) Energy’s FEMP and funding • Andersen Air Force Base (Guam) collection of case studies: through the Pacifi c Northwest • Kunsan Air Force Base National Laboratory. REM was http://www.energy.wsu.edu/ (South Korea) modeled after successful Resource projects/rem/ • Osan Air Force Base Conservation Manager (RCM) (South Korea) programs in Washington and For general information about • Misawa Air Force Base (Japan) Oregon school districts in the FEMP, visit the FEMP Web site: • Kadena Air Base (Japan) early 1990s. http://www.eere.energy.gov/ • Yokota Air Base (Japan) femp/ • 611th Civil Engineering Squadron (Alaska) What are the Benefi ts • Eilsen Air Force Base (Alaska) • Lackland Air Force Base (Texas) of a REM? For more information, contact A REM identifi es energy • Tyndall Air Force Base (Florida) any of the following individuals: • Air Force Civil Engineering effi ciency procurement Support Agency opportunities, targets ways Karen Messmer to improve operations and Washington State University Marine Corps maintenance, provides training Extension Energy Program • Marine Corps Base Camp to building managers, creates (360) 956-2090 Pendleton (California) awareness programs for site [email protected] • Landing Craft Air Cushion personnel, identifi es rebate or Assault Unit 5 (California) Dave Hunt technical assistance programs, • Marine Corps Recruit Depot Pacifi c Northwest National Laboratory recommends more effi cient San Diego (California) (202) 646-7867 • Marine Corps Air Station technologies and innovations for [email protected] integration in new construction Miramar (California) • Marine Corps Base Hawaii or remodeling projects, seeks Bill Sandusky (Hawaii) avenues for alternative fi nancing Pacifi c Northwest National Laboratory of projects through partnerships (509) 375-3709 Coast Guard [email protected] with their utility and other • Pacifi c CEU (California) service providers, and reduces energy and resource costs. A REM Ab Ream Federal Energy Management Program U.S. Postal Service program for a large federal site is (California) USDOE/HQ (Washington, DC) capable of generating a typical (202) 586-7230 return on investment of 300 to [email protected] 400 percent. Arun Jhaveri © 2005 Washington State University USDOE Western Regional Offi ce Extension Energy Program. This fact sheet Support available contains material written and produced for (206) 553-2152 public distribution. You may reprint this for REMs [email protected] written material, provided you do not use FEMP provides general support it to endorse a commercial product. Please for the REM program through reference by title and credit Washington State University Extension Energy Pro- collaboration with FEMP gram. Published August 2005. WSUEEP2004-001 (Updated 8/05) 2.
Recommended publications
  • Numerical Simulation of Groundwater Flow at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington

    Numerical Simulation of Groundwater Flow at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington

    Prepared in cooperation with the Naval Facilities Engineering Command–Northwest Numerical Simulation of Groundwater Flow at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington Open-File Report 2016–1135 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Numerical Simulation of Groundwater Flow at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington By Joseph L. Jones, Kenneth H. Johnson, and Lonna M. Frans Prepared in cooperation with the Naval Facilities Engineering Command-Northwest Open-File Report 2016–1135 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Jones, J.L., Johnson, K.H., and Frans, L.M., 2016, Numerical simulation of groundwater flow at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington: U.S.
  • PETE TAYLOR Partnership of Excellence Award

    PETE TAYLOR Partnership of Excellence Award

    2018 PETE TAYLOR Partnership of Excellence Award July 23, 2018 Military Child Education Coalition 20th National Training Seminar Washington, DC MILITARY CHILD EDUCATION COALITION 909 Mountain Lion Circle Harker Heights, Texas 76548 (254) 953-1923 (254) 953-1925 fax www.MilitaryChild.org Combined Federal Campaign #10261 During his tenure as Chairman of the Military Child Education Coalition, Lieutenant General (Ret) Pete Taylor played a critical role in the establishment of partnerships between military installations and school districts serving military-connected children. In 2004, the MCEC Board of Directors established the Pete Taylor Partnership of Excellence Award in recognition of General Taylor’s work and dedication to helping America’s military children. This annual award encourages and applauds the outstanding partnerships that exist between military installations and school districts, and brings special recognition to those partnerships that demonstrate General Taylor’s long-held belief that “goodness happens at the local level.” Congratulations to the 2018 winners of the Pete Taylor Partnership of Excellence Award. www.MilitaryChild.org 1 OUTSTANDING COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP AWARD – K-12 Restorative Practices Coalition-Colorado NAMES OF PARTNERS: • El Paso County School District 49 • Schriever Air Force Base • Peterson Air Force Base • Fort Carson • BRIGHT (Building Restorative • United States Air Force Academy Interventions Growing Honorable Traditions) The Restorative Practices Coalition includes representatives from El Paso County District 49, Peterson Air Force Base, Schriever Air Force Base, Fort Carson, United States Air Force Academy, and BRIGHT (Building Restorative Interventions Growing Honorable Traditions). This partnership supports more than 20,000 students of which more than 3,000 students have a parent or guardian actively serving on base.
  • Economic Development Appendix

    Economic Development Appendix

    Technical Appendices Economic Development Appendix Table of Contents City Profile ................................................................................................................. ED Appendix-2 Inventory of the Local and Regional Economy ......................................................... ED Appendix-3 Kitsap County Regional Economy ......................................................................... ED Appendix-4 Naval Base Kitsap .................................................................................................. ED Appendix-5 City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan ED Appendix-1 Appendices Appendix Economic Development City Profile The City of Bremerton is the largest city in Kitsap County, only 11 miles across the water from Seattle and just 33 miles northwest of Tacoma off State Highway 16. The Washington State Ferry system conveniently links downtown Bremerton to downtown Seattle, providing unobstructed automobile access, a unique feature, in comparison to other satellite cities around Seattle. State highways tie Bremerton and Port of Bremerton facilities (including the Bremerton National Airport), to Tacoma on the south, and to the Hood Canal Bridge on the north, Puget Sound’s link to the Olympic Peninsula. The table below compares Bremerton statistics with Kitsap County and Washington State. Table EC-1 Bremerton Statistics, Compared with Kitsap County, State of WA Bremerton Kitsap County Washington State Population, 2014 Estimate 38,572 254,183 7,061,530 Population, 2010 37,729 251,133 6,724,540
  • San Diego Unified Port District San Diego, CA 92101

    San Diego Unified Port District San Diego, CA 92101

    Page 1 of 215 3165 Pacific Hwy. San Diego Unified Port District San Diego, CA 92101 Special Meeting Minutes Board of Port Commissioners Wednesday,January16,2019 9:30 AM Don L. Nay Port Administration Boardroom Closed Session A. Roll Call. Present: 7 - Commissioner Bonelli, Chairperson Castellanos, Commissioner Malcolm, Commissioner Merrifield, Commissioner Moore, Commissioner Valderrama, and Commissioner Zucchet Excused: 0 Absent: 0 Commissioner Moore was excused until she arrived at 9:36 am. Officers Present: Coniglio, DeAngelis, Monson, Morales, and Russell B. Public Communications. The following member(s) of the public addressed the Board with non agenda-related comments: None CLOSED SESSION Thomas A. Russell, General Counsel, announced the Closed Session items as follows: 1. Closed Session Item No. 1 PERSONNEL EVALUATION: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Government Code Section 54957 No reportable action was taken on this item. San Diego Unified Port District Page 1 Page 2 of 215 Board of Port Commissioners Special Meeting Minutes January 16, 2019 2. 2019-0020 Closed Session Item No. 2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: SDUPD - Chula Vista Bayfront parcel consisting of approximately 74.7 acres of land at H Street and Marina Parkway, Chula Vista Negotiating Parties: RIDA Chula Vista, LLC,- Ira Mitzner and Luke Charlton; City of Chula Vista - Gary Halbert; SDUPD - Shaun Sumner, Tony Gordon, Adam Meyer, Stephanie Shook and Sean Jones. Under Negotiations: Price and Terms
  • Navedtra 14137A

    Navedtra 14137A

    NONRESIDENT TRAINING COURSE August 2009 Master-at-Arms NAVEDTRA 14137A S/N 0504LP1089250 Notice: NETPDTC is no longer responsible for the content accuracy of the NRTCs. For content issues, contact the servicing Center of Excellence: Center for Security Forces (CENSECFOR); (757) 462-2189 or DSN: 253-2189. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. i Although the words “he,” “him,” and “his” are used sparingly in this course to enhance communication, they are not intended to be gender driven or to affront or discriminate against anyone. THE LINKS: Links contained through out this manual are made to assist you in finding the specific material quicker. Due to network speeds, connectivity, file sizes and server settings, the embedded links may not always open on your computer. Chapter 10 contains the DoD and Service web sites where the detailed references are maintained. Some links direct you to Navy Knowledge Online (NKO). Hovering your mouse over the link will tell you if the file is located on NKO or not. It is strongly recommended that you log into NKO prior to clicking on any links to facilitate in file downloads. ii PREFACE By enrolling in this self-study course, you have demonstrated a desire to improve yourself and the Navy. Remember, however, this self-study course is only one part of the total Navy training program. Practical experience, schools, selected reading, and your desire to succeed are also necessary to successfully round out a fully meaningful training program. THE COURSE: This self-study course is organized into subject matter areas, each containing learning objectives to help you determine what you should learn along with text and illustrations to help you understand the information.
  • Kitsap County Veterans Memorials and Museums

    Kitsap County Veterans Memorials and Museums

    Kitsap County Veterans Memorials and Museums UPDATED 9 August 2015 Written and researched by Marion T, (Mick) Hersey, Historical Memorial Preservationist Layout assistance and editing by Leif Bentsen I would like to cordially invite you to view the Memorials and Museums to Veterans throughout Kitsap County. Over the past 5 years I have led groups in refurbishing and cleaning up a lot of these sites. When I started this project in 2010 I did not realize there were so many memorials and museums in our county, the current count is over 100, (This is counting all Boardwalk plaques as 1 even though there are over 300). The 2 of the newest memorials in 2014 were in honor of John D. (Bud) Hawk. At the Veteran’s Day Service a portion of Illahee RD in front of Brownsville Elementary was named “John (Bud) Hawk Memorial DR” and discussion took place to honor him with a Elementary School. The new Elementary school in Jackson Park is now called “The John D. “Bud” Hawk Elementary School at Jackson Park”. We also welcomed an addition to Evergreen Park, the 9-11 Memorial. On the Boardwalk we dedicated and placed a Memorial stone to those that perished from Washington State on the USS Frank E. Evans. So we are expanding our listing with these Memorials, Honorariums and Museums. This year in 2015, the crew of the USS Bremerton came to town and the plaque in honor of their Submarine was added to the Memorial at Hal’s Corner. Memorials were also added as they were located at the VFW in honor of their member who was a Medal of Honor Recipient and in Port Orchard, the Clayton Playground which is named after Michael Clayton.
  • Feds Feed Families Campaign Huge Success

    Feds Feed Families Campaign Huge Success

    SFPTFMRFD A g . VnlI 70. Nn 1 . NAVYMII / nAl /OIIANTANAMO . CAPPRAAK nnM/NG-.-nt R- NAVAI CT-IMM RIIANTANAMA RAV PI IRA . -C InnC RAY 'J9 . CDA AC nARG2 . ni-C1.An Feds Feed Families Campaign Huge Success Naval Station Guantanamo Bay Executive Officer Cmdr. Colin Caswell accepts a check from Mr. Thomas George for the Feds Feed Families campaign. Various base organizationshelped raise $7380.88 for those affected by the Oklahoma tornados. MCSN Jason Bawgus Photo Journalist Various organizations from Naval Station (NS) families, veterans, elderly, homeless and other Americans Guantanamo Bay raised $7380.88 for the Feds Feed back home." Families organization, June 1 to Aug. 28. In addition to the $7380.88 raised by the GTMO Contributing groups included the Naval Station Junior community, the Regional Food Bank (RFB) of Oklahoma Enlisted Association, the First Class Petty Officers announced a match offer, so the $7380.88 raised in Association (FCPOA), Girl Scout Service Unit 085 and GTMO will be matched dollar for dollar by corporate the Boy Scout Troop 435, Chief Petty Officer Association donors including the Boeing Company, Kia Motors and the USNH Junior Enlisted Association. America, Top of the World and an Oklahoma City family. "It is really amazing to see how much money everyone "We are so thankful for the generosity of the NAVSTA raised on base," said Petty Officer 3rd Class Ian Browder. GTMO community. The donation will directly impact "I volunteered with the Naval Station JEA and it was hungry families immediately," said Angie Gaines, really an honor to be a part of such a special event." Director of Marketing and communications for the RFB Several chapel congregations donated money as well as of Oklahoma.
  • Participant List

    Participant List

    Participant List Name Organization Business Phone Business Email Achterman, Gail Inst. for Nat. Resources, OR State Univ. 541-740-3190 [email protected] Ack, Brad Puget Sound Action Team Partnership 360-725-5437 [email protected] Ackelson, Mark Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation 515-288-1846 [email protected] Adair, Steve Ducks Unlimited, Inc. 701-355-3511 [email protected] Adams, Bruce San Juan County Commission 435-587-2820 [email protected] Adams, Laurie Davies Coevolution Institute 415-362-1137 [email protected] Adams, Les Ntn’l Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration 202-482-6090 [email protected] Addor, Mary Lou Natural Resources Leadership Institute 919-515-9602 [email protected] Adkins, Carol Federal Highway Administration 202-366-2024 [email protected] Agpaoa, Liz USDA Forest Service 202-205-1661 [email protected] Albrecht, Virginia S. Hunton & Williams, LLP 202-955-1943 [email protected] Alden Weingardt, Susan USDA Forest Service 510-559-6342 [email protected] Aldrich, James The Nature Conservancy 859-259-9655 [email protected] Allen, Diana National Park Service 314-436-1324 x112 [email protected] Anderson, Bob United Winegrowers for Sonoma County 707-433-7319 [email protected] Anderson, David Office of Management and Budget [email protected] Anderson, John R. Monsanto Company 919-821-9295 [email protected] Annand, Fred The Nature Conservancy, NC Chapter 919-403-8558 [email protected] Antoine, AICP, Todd Great Rivers Greenway District 314-436-7009 [email protected] Anzalone, Ronald D. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 202-606-8523 [email protected] Arce, Mardi NPS, Jefferson National Expansion Memorial 314-655-1643 [email protected] Archuletta, Phil P&M Plastics, Inc.
  • Fleet Readiness Center Southeast Welcomes First F-5N Tiger II from Fleet Readiness Center Southeast Public Affairs

    Fleet Readiness Center Southeast Welcomes First F-5N Tiger II from Fleet Readiness Center Southeast Public Affairs

    www.cnic.navy.mil/jaxairnews October 25, 2019 VOL. 77 - NO. 25 - Jacksonville, Fla. Fleet Readiness Center Southeast Welcomes First F-5N Tiger II From Fleet Readiness Center Southeast Public Affairs A group gathered in a Fleet Readiness Center Southeast (FRCSE) hangar eagerly awaiting the arrival of the depot’s first F-5N Tiger II fighter, Sept. 11. As the aircraft taxied, trumped in size by the P-8As it passed on the flight line, it showcased its most anticipated attributes. Cmdr. Matt Pearce, F-5 pilot instructor with Fighter Squadron Composite 111 based at NAS Key West, Florida, described it as small, maneuverable and cost-effective — saving the warfighter and taxpayer money, materials and resources. “What we don’t have in technology, we make up in tactics and knowledge,” Pearce said. “Once you take your eyes off of us outside of a mile to a mile and a half, it’s very hard to pick us back up.” Plainly put, by training an F/A-18 pilot in a jet used by the adversary in combat, he or she learns how to outwit and out maneuver the enemy. Once tactical skills are mastered using a hands-on approach, take that same pilot, put him or her in a superior aircraft and expect a well-rounded aviator who Photos by Toiete Jackson can rip a hole in the sky. An F-5N Tiger II, with Fighter Squadron Composite 111 taxis on the For FRCSE, it was an ideal time to take on the adversarial aircraft’s flight line as Fleet Readiness Center Southeast ground crew wait to workload.
  • Vice Admiral Dixon R. Smith Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Fleet Readiness and Logistics

    Vice Admiral Dixon R. Smith Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Fleet Readiness and Logistics

    Vice Admiral Dixon R. Smith Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Fleet Readiness and Logistics Vice Adm. Dixon Smith is a native of Green Farms, Connecticut, and entered the Naval Academy Preparatory School in 1978. After receiving his commission from the United States Naval Academy in 1983, he was designated a surface warfare officer in 1985. Smith holds a master’s degree in business from Webster University and is a graduate of the Army Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Smith’s first sea tour was aboard USS Miller (FF 1091), serving as first lieutenant and damage control assistant. Follow-on service at sea included operations officer aboard USS Jarrett (FFG 33), participating in Operation Desert Storm; operations officer aboard USS Gridley (CG 21), participating in the establishment of Operation Southern Watch over Southern Iraq; and executive officer aboard USS Antietam (CG 54). Assignments ashore include duty at Naval Education and Training Center, Newport, Rhode Island, as seamanship instructor and service as aide to the naval inspector general, Washington, D.C. Duties in Naples, Italy, as deputy executive assistant to Commander in Chief, Allied Forces, Southern Europe/Commander in Chief, U.S. Naval Forces, Europe, included service in support of the Joint Forces Commander, Operation Allied Force and Commander, Joint Task Force Noble Anvil during NATO’s operations in Kosovo. Additionally, he served a tour at the United States Naval Academy as 4th Battalion officer and Plebe Summer officer in charge. He has commanded USS The Sullivans (DDG 68), Naval Base San Diego, Navy Region Hawaii, Naval Surface Group Middle Pacific, Navy Region Southwest, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic and Navy Installations Command.
  • Comprehensive Review of the DON Uniformed Legal Communities

    Comprehensive Review of the DON Uniformed Legal Communities

    (PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Background ........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Core Themes — The Panel “Lens” .................................................................... 4 1.4 Report Structure ................................................................................................. 8 1.5 Findings & Recommendations ........................................................................... 8 1.6 Implementation Oversight ................................................................................ 11 1.7 Submission of Report ....................................................................................... 12 2. REVIEW SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY .............................................................. 13 2.1 SECNAV Direction ........................................................................................... 13 2.2 Previous Reviews ............................................................................................. 14 2.3 Information Gathering ...................................................................................... 16 2.3.1 Navy Working Group Summary ................................................................. 16 2.3.2 Marine Corps Working Group Summary
  • CNAF – for Official Use Only 2011: Naval Aviation Centennial

    CNAF – for Official Use Only 2011: Naval Aviation Centennial

    CNAF – For Official Use Only 2011: Naval Aviation Centennial Honoring Our Legacy – RADM McGrath 1 CNAF – For Official Use Only Centennial of Naval Aviation - 2011 Celebrate - Honor Past - Recruit “To honor a century of mission ready men and women in Naval Aviation and to recognize unique Naval Aviation achievements through regionally based, event driven celebrations". http://www.navy.mil/flynavy 2 CNAF – For Official Use Only Centennial Events • Signature Events – San Diego Kick-off : 10-12 Feb – Naval Aviation Symposium: 3-9 May – Washington, DC Closing: 3 Dec • Blues Angels Airshow Schedule – 37 Airshows/Flyovers – San Diego & Oshkosh Flyovers • Navy Weeks/Fleet Weeks/Marine Week – 2011 NAVCO Theme – “Centennial of Naval Aviation” - 22 Navy Weeks – 11 in conjunction with Blue Angels Airshows – Marine Week – St Louis, MO – 6 Fleet Weeks Connect All Events to Naval Aviation Accomplishments 3 CNAF – For Official Use Only CoNA Tier One Events San Diego Kick-off 9-12 Feb 17. Detroit Navy Week 18-24 Jul 1. Mississippi Navy Week 19-27 Mar 18. Oshkosh, WI 25 Jul–1 Aug 2. NAS Corpus Christi 9-10 Apr 19. Seattle Fleet Week 31 Jul–8 Aug 3. JRB Ft. Worth 15-17 Apr 20. Fargo Navy Week 8-14 Aug 4. MCAS Beaufort 30 Apr–1 May 21. Maine Air Show 26-27 Aug 5. NAS Pensacola 3-9 May 22. NAS Pax River 3-4 Sep 6. New Orleans Navy Week 5-11 May 23. Omaha Navy Week 6-11 Sep 7. St. Louis TBD May 24. National Air Races 14-18 Sep 8. MCAS New River 13-15 May 25.