DOCSLIB.ORG

OMG Sysml Specification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OMG Sysml Specification OMG SysML Specification This document is the OMG Proposed Available Specification (PAS) for SysML 1.0, which replaces the Final Adopted Specification (FAS) for SysML 1.0 (ptc/06-05-04). It has been prepared by the SysML Finalization Task Force (FTF). See the following for further information regarding this PAS version, the OMG specification lifecy- cle, and forthcoming specification versions: "OMG Document Access Page http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/ "OMG SysML Website: http://www.omgsysml.org/ OMG Proposed Available Specification ptc/2007-02-03 OMG Proposed Available Specification for SysML 1.0 ptc/2007-02-03 (with change bars, a.k.a. the Convenience Document) This document—released March 23, 2007 ptc/2007-02-04 (without change bars) Date: March 23, 2007 OMG Systems Modeling Language (OMG SysMLTM) Specification Proposed Available Specification ptc/2007-02-03 (with change bars a.k.a Convenience Document) Copyright © 2003-2006, American Systems Corporation Copyright © 2003-2006, ARTISAN Software Tools Copyright © 2003-2006, BAE SYSTEMS Copyright © 2003-2006, The Boeing Company Copyright © 2003-2006, Ceira Technologies Copyright © 2003-2006, Deere & Company Copyright © 2003-2006, EADS Astrium GmbH Copyright © 2003-2006, EmbeddedPlus Engineering Copyright © 2003-2006, Eurostep Group AB Copyright © 2003-2006, Gentleware AG Copyright © 2003-2006, I-Logix, Inc. Copyright © 2003-2006, International Business Machines Copyright © 2003-2006, International Council on Systems Engineering Copyright © 2003-2006, Israel Aircraft Industries Copyright © 2003-2006, Lockheed Martin Corporation Copyright © 2003-2006, Mentor Graphics Copyright © 2003-2006, Motorola, Inc. Comment: Issue 10050/10623 Copyright © 2003-2006, National Institute of Standards and Technology Copyright © 2003-2006, Northrop Grumman Copyright © 1997-2006, Object Management Group. Copyright © 2003-2006, oose Innovative Informatik GmbH Copyright © 2003-2006, PivotPoint Technology Corporation Copyright © 2003-2006, Raytheon Company Copyright © 2003-2006, Sparx Systems Copyright © 2003-2006, Telelogic AB Copyright © 2003-2006, THALES USE OF SPECIFICATION - TERMS, CONDITIONS & NOTICES This document describes a language specification developed by an informal partnership of vendors and users, with input from additional reviewers and contributors. This document does not represent a commitment to implement any portion of this specification in any company’s products. See the full text of this document for additional disclaimers and acknowledgments. The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice. Comment: Issue 10046 The specification customizes the Unified Modeling Language (UML) specification of the Object Management Group (OMG) to address the requirements of Systems Engineering as specified in the UML for Systems Engineering RFP, OMG document number ad/2003-03-41. This document includes references to and excerpts from the UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification (OMG document number Formal/05-07-04) and UML 2.0 Infrastructure Specification (OMG document number ptc/04-10-14) with copyright holders and conditions as noted in those documents. LICENSES Redistribution and use of this specification, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: • Redistributions of this specification must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. • The Copyright Holders listed in the above copyright notice may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this specification without specific prior written permission. • All modified versions of this specification must include a prominent notice stating how and when the specification was modified. THIS SPECIFICATION IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SPECIFICATION, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. TRADEMARKS Systems Modeling Language and SysML, which are used to identify this specification, are not usable as trademarks since SysML Partners has established their usage to identify this specification without any trademark status or restriction. Organizations that wish to establish trademarks related to this specification should distinguish them somehow from SysML and Systems Modeling Language, for example by adding a unique prefix (e.g., OMG SysML). Unified Modeling Language and UML are trademarks of the OMG. All other products or company names mentioned are used for identification purposes only, and may be trademarks of their respective owners. PATENTS The attention of adopters is directed to the possibility that compliance with or adoption of OMG specifications may require use of an invention covered by patent rights. OMG shall not be responsible for identifying patents for which a license may be required by any OMG specification, or for conducting legal inquiries into the legal validity or scope of those patents that are brought to its attention. OMG specifications are prospective and advisory only. Prospective users are responsible for protecting themselves against liability for infringement of patents. RESTRICTED RIGHTS LEGEND Use, duplication or disclosure by the U.S. Government is subject to the restrictions set forth in subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of The Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software Clause at DFARS 252.227-7013 or in subparagraph (c)(1) and (2) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clauses at 48 C.F.R. 52.227-19 or as specified in 48 C.F.R. 227-7202-2 of the DoD F.A.R. Supplement and its successors, or as specified in 48 C.F.R. 12.212 of the Federal Acquisition Regulations and its successors, as applicable. The specification copyright owners are as indicated above and may be contacted through the Object Management Group, 140 Kendrick Street, Needham, MA 02494, U.S.A. TRADEMARKS The OMG Object Management Group Logo®, CORBA®, CORBA Academy®, The Information Brokerage®, XMI® and IIOP® are registered trademarks of the Object Management Group. OMG™, Object Management Group™, CORBA logos™, OMG Interface Definition Language (IDL)™, The Architecture of Choice for a Changing World™, CORBAservices™, CORBAfacilities™, CORBAmed™, CORBAnet™, Integrate 2002™, Middleware That's Everywhere™, UML™, Unified Modeling Language™, The UML Cube logo™, MOF™, CWM™, The CWM Logo™, Model Driven Architecture™, Model Driven Architecture Logos™, MDA™, OMG Model Driven Architecture™, OMG MDA™ , OMG SysMLTM, and the XMI Logo™ are trademarks of the Object Management Group. All other products or company names mentioned are used for identification purposes only, and may be trademarks of their respective owners. COMPLIANCE The copyright holders listed above acknowledge that the Object Management Group (acting itself or through its designees) is and shall at all times be the sole entity that may authorize developers, suppliers and sellers of computer software to use certification marks, trademarks or other special designations to indicate compliance with these materials. Software developed under the terms of this license may claim compliance or conformance with this specification if and only if the software compliance is of a nature fully matching the applicable compliance points as stated in the specification. Software developed only partially matching the applicable compliance points may claim only that the software was based on this specification, but may not claim compliance or conformance with this specification. In the event that testing suites are implemented or approved by Object Management Group, Inc., software developed using this specification may claim compliance or conformance with the specification only if the software satisfactorily completes the testing suites. OMG’s Issue Reporting Procedure All OMG specifications are subject to continuous review and improvement. As part of this pro- cess we encourage readers to report any ambiguities, inconsistencies, or inaccuracies they may find by completing the Issue Reporting Form listed on the main web page http://www.omg.org, under Documents, Report a Bug/Issue (http://www.omg.org/technology/agreement.htm). Table of Contents 0.1 OMG’s Issue Reporting Procedure 1 1 Preface xiii - Introduction 1 2 Scope 3 3 Normative References 3 4 Additional Information 4 4.1 Relationships to Other Standards 4 4.2 How to Read this Specification 4 4.3 Acknowledgements 4 5 Language Architecture 7 5.1 Design Principles 7 5.2 Architecture 8 5.3 Extension Mechanisms 10 5.4 SysML Diagrams 11 6 Compliance 13 6.1 Compliance with UML Subset (UML4SysML) 13 6.1.1 Compliance Level Contents 13 6.2 Compliance with SysML Extensions 14 6.3 Meaning of Compliance 15 7 Language Formalism 19 7.1 Levels of Formalism 19 7.2 Chapter Specification Structure 19 7.2.1 Overview 19 7.2.2 Diagram Elements 19 7.2.3 UML Extensions 20 7.2.3.1 Usage Examples 20 7.3 Conventions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 07 Requirements What About RFP/RFB/Rfis?
    CMPSCI520/620 07 Requirements & UML Intro 07 Requirements SW Requirements Specification • Readings • How do we communicate the Requirements to others? • [cK99] Cris Kobryn, Co-Chair, “Introduction to UML: Structural and Use Case Modeling,” UML Revision Task Force Object Modeling with OMG UML Tutorial • It is common practice to capture them in an SRS Series © 1999-2001 OMG and Contributors: Crossmeta, EDS, IBM, Enea Data, • But an SRS doesn’t need to be a single paper document Hewlett-Packard, IntelliCorp, Kabira Technologies, Klasse Objecten, Rational Software, Telelogic, Unisys http://www.omg.org/technology/uml/uml_tutorial.htm • Purpose • [OSBB99] Gunnar Övergaard, Bran Selic, Conrad Bock and Morgan Björkande, “Behavioral Modeling,” UML Revision Task Force, Object Modeling with OMG UML • Contractual requirements Tutorial Series © 1999-2001 OMG and Contributors: Crossmeta, EDS, IBM, Enea elicitation Data, Hewlett-Packard, IntelliCorp, Kabira Technologies, Klasse Objecten, Rational • Baseline Software, Telelogic, Unisys http://www.omg.org/technology/uml/uml_tutorial.htm • for evaluating subsequent products • [laM01] Maciaszek, L.A. (2001): Requirements Analysis and System Design. • for change control requirements Developing Information Systems with UML, Addison Wesley Copyright © 2000 by analysis Addison Wesley • Audience • [cB04] Bock, Conrad, Advanced Analysis and Design with UML • Users, Purchasers requirements http://www.kabira.com/bock/ specification • [rM02] Miller, Randy, “Practical UML: A hands-on introduction for developers,”
    [Show full text]
  • An Optimal Control Approach for Determiniation of the Heat Loss Coefficient in an Ics Solar Domesticater W Heating System
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2010 An Optimal Control Approach For Determiniation Of The Heat Loss Coefficient In An Ics Solar Domesticater W Heating System Camilo Gil University of Central Florida Part of the Electrical and Electronics Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Gil, Camilo, "An Optimal Control Approach For Determiniation Of The Heat Loss Coefficient In An Ics Solar Domestic Water Heating System" (2010). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 4297. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4297 AN OPTIMAL CONTROL APPROACH FOR DETERMINATION OF THE HEAT LOSS COEFFICIENT IN AN ICS SOLAR DOMESTIC WATER HEATING SYSTEM by CAMILO GIL B.S. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 2001 M.S. University of New Mexico, 2005 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2010 Major Professor: Marwan Simaan ©2010 Camilo Gil ii ABSTRACT Water heating in a typical home in the U.S. accounts for a significant portion (between 14% and 25%) of the total home’s annual energy consumption. The objective of considerably reducing the home’s energy consumption from the utilities calls for the use of onsite renewable energy systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Diagram.Pdf
    TU2943: Information Engineering Methodology Lab Notes, 2009-2010, Faculty of Technology and Information Science, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia LAB 5: Interaction Diagram - UML Communication Diagram OBJECTIVES To understand the role of dynamic models in requirement analysis by reading and constructing UML Communication Diagram. INTRODUCTION Communication Diagram (a.k.a. Collaboration Diagram) Communication Diagram provides another way to model a scenario. Essentially is a part of Interaction Diagram (just like Sequence Diagram). Each object is represented by an object icon, and links are used to indicate communication paths on which messages are transmitted. Messages presented in the same way as those in sequence diagram. Formerly known as Collaboration Diagram in UML 1.x specification. Communication Diagram represents a combination of information taken from Use Case, Class and Sequence Diagrams describing both the static structure and dynamic behavior of the system. Comparing and Contrasting: Collaboration and Sequence Both diagrams show the same information: Objects/classes Messages Sequence Conditional Repetition Messages to self Sequence Diagram and Communication Diagram are two views of the same scenario. Collaboration diagrams emphasize who-is-talking-to-who. But the time-ordering of the messages who gets obscured. Sequence diagrams emphasize time-ordering. But the who-is-talking-to-who gets obscured. Use the diagram that you are most comfortable with. Structure and Notation of Communication Diagram Objects are named <an object name>:< its class> . Nor Samsiah Binti Sani 1 TU2943: Information Engineering Methodology Lab Notes, 2009-2010, Faculty of Technology and Information Science, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Either <an object name> or <a class name> can be removed. Collaborations / communications are shown by lines between objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Blurred Lines Between Role and Reality: a Phenomenological Study of Acting
    Antioch University AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive Student & Alumni Scholarship, including Dissertations & Theses Dissertations & Theses 2019 Blurred Lines Between Role and Reality: A Phenomenological Study of Acting Gregory Hyppolyte Brown Follow this and additional works at: https://aura.antioch.edu/etds Part of the Psychology Commons BLURRED LINES BETWEEN ROLE AND REALITY: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY OF ACTING A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Antioch University Santa Barbara In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the the degree of DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY In CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY by GREGORY HIPPOLYTE BROWN August 2019 This dissertation, by Gregory Hippolyte Brown, has been approved by the committee members signed below who recommend that it be accepted by the faculty of Antioch University Santa Barbara in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Committee: _________________________ Brett Kia-Keating, Ed.D. Chairperson __________________________ Sharleen O‘ Brien, Ph.D. Second Faculty __________________________ Thalia R. Goldstein, Ph.D. External Expert ii Copyright © 2019 Gregory Hippolyte Brown iii Abstract When an actor plays a character in a film, they try to connect with the emotions and behavioral patterns of the scripted character. There is an absence of literature regarding how a role influences an actor’s life before, during, and after film production. This study examined how acting roles might influence an actor during times on set shooting a movie or television series as well as their personal life after the filming is finished. Additionally the study considered the psychological impact of embodying a role, and whether or not an actor ever has the feeling that the performed character has independent agency over the actor.
    [Show full text]
  • Customizing UML with Stereotypes
    Customizing UML with Stereotypes Mirosáaw StaroĔ ii iii Blekinge Institute of Technology Dissertation Series No 2003:06 ISSN 1650-2140 ISBN 91-7295-028-5 Customizing UML with Stereotypes Mirosáaw StaroĔ Department of Software Engineering and Computer Science Blekinge Institute of Technology Sweden iv BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Blekinge Institute of Technology, situated on the southeast coast of Sweden, started in 1989 and in 1999 gained the right to run Ph.D programmes in technology. Research programmes have been started in the following areas: • Applied signal processing • Computer science • Computer systems technology • Design and digital media • Human work science with a special focus on IT • IT and gender research • Mechanical engineering • Software engineering • Spatial planning • Telecommunication systems Research studies are carried out in all faculties and about a third of the annual budget is dedicated to research. Blekinge Institute of Technology S-371 79 Karlskrona, Sweden http://www.bth.se v Jacket illustration: © 2003 GillWorth gallery, www.gillworthreptiles.co.uk Publisher: Blekinge Institute of Technology Printed by Kaserntryckeriet, Karlskrona, Sweden 2003 ISBN 91-7295-028-5 vi Abstract The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is a visual modeling language for documenting and specifying software. It is gaining popularity as a language for a variety of purposes. It was designed as a result of a unifying activity in the last decade. Since this general purpose language cannot suit all possible needs, it has built-in mechanisms for providing extensibility for specific purposes. One such mechanism is the notion of stereotype, which is a means of branding the existing model element with a new semantics.
    [Show full text]
  • OMG Systems Modeling Language (OMG Sysml™) Tutorial 25 June 2007
    OMG Systems Modeling Language (OMG SysML™) Tutorial 25 June 2007 Sanford Friedenthal Alan Moore Rick Steiner (emails included in references at end) Copyright © 2006, 2007 by Object Management Group. Published and used by INCOSE and affiliated societies with permission. Status • Specification status – Adopted by OMG in May ’06 – Finalization Task Force Report in March ’07 – Available Specification v1.0 expected June ‘07 – Revision task force chartered for SysML v1.1 in March ‘07 • This tutorial is based on the OMG SysML adopted specification (ad-06-03-01) and changes proposed by the Finalization Task Force (ptc/07-03-03) • This tutorial, the specifications, papers, and vendor info can be found on the OMG SysML Website at http://www.omgsysml.org/ 7/26/2007 Copyright © 2006,2007 by Object Management Group. 2 Objectives & Intended Audience At the end of this tutorial, you should have an awareness of: • Benefits of model driven approaches for systems engineering • SysML diagrams and language concepts • How to apply SysML as part of a model based SE process • Basic considerations for transitioning to SysML This course is not intended to make you a systems modeler! You must use the language. Intended Audience: • Practicing Systems Engineers interested in system modeling • Software Engineers who want to better understand how to integrate software and system models • Familiarity with UML is not required, but it helps 7/26/2007 Copyright © 2006,2007 by Object Management Group. 3 Topics • Motivation & Background • Diagram Overview and Language Concepts • SysML Modeling as Part of SE Process – Structured Analysis – Distiller Example – OOSEM – Enhanced Security System Example • SysML in a Standards Framework • Transitioning to SysML • Summary 7/26/2007 Copyright © 2006,2007 by Object Management Group.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hybrid Static Type Inference Framework with Neural
    HiTyper: A Hybrid Static Type Inference Framework with Neural Prediction Yun Peng Zongjie Li Cuiyun Gao∗ The Chinese University of Hong Kong Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin Institute of Technology Hong Kong, China Shenzhen, China Shenzhen, China [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Bowei Gao David Lo Michael Lyu Harbin Institute of Technology Singapore Management University The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shenzhen, China Singapore Hong Kong, China [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT also supports type annotations in the Python Enhancement Pro- Type inference for dynamic programming languages is an impor- posals (PEP) [21, 22, 39, 43]. tant yet challenging task. By leveraging the natural language in- Type prediction is a popular task performed by most attempts. formation of existing human annotations, deep neural networks Traditional static type inference techniques [4, 9, 14, 17, 36] and outperform other traditional techniques and become the state-of- type inference tools such as Pytype [34], Pysonar2 [33], and Pyre the-art (SOTA) in this task. However, they are facing some new Infer [31] can predict sound results for the variables with enough challenges, such as fixed type set, type drift, type correctness, and static constraints, e.g., a = 1, but are unable to handle the vari- composite type prediction. ables with few static constraints, e.g. most function arguments. To mitigate the challenges, in this paper, we propose a hybrid On the other hand, dynamic type inference techniques [3, 37] and type inference framework named HiTyper, which integrates static type checkers simulate the workflow of functions and solve types inference into deep learning (DL) models for more accurate type according to input cases and typing rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Unified Modeling Language 2.0 Part 1 - Introduction
    UML 2.0 – Tutorial (v4) 1 Unified Modeling Language 2.0 Part 1 - Introduction Prof. Dr. Harald Störrle Dr. Alexander Knapp University of Innsbruck University of Munich mgm technology partners (c) 2005-2006, Dr. H. Störrle, Dr. A. Knapp UML 2.0 – Tutorial (v4) 2 1 - Introduction History and Predecessors • The UML is the “lingua franca” of software engineering. • It subsumes, integrates and consolidates most predecessors. • Through the network effect, UML has a much broader spread and much better support (tools, books, trainings etc.) than other notations. • The transition from UML 1.x to UML 2.0 has – resolved a great number of issues; – introduced many new concepts and notations (often feebly defined); – overhauled and improved the internal structure completely. • While UML 2.0 still has many problems, current version (“the standard”) it is much better than what we ever had formal/05-07-04 of August ‘05 before. (c) 2005-2006, Dr. H. Störrle, Dr. A. Knapp UML 2.0 – Tutorial (v4) 3 1 - Introduction Usage Scenarios • UML has not been designed for specific, limited usages. • There is currently no consensus on the role of the UML: – Some see UML only as tool for sketching class diagrams representing Java programs. – Some believe that UML is “the prototype of the next generation of programming languages”. • UML is a really a system of languages (“notations”, “diagram types”) each of which may be used in a number of different situations. • UML is applicable for a multitude of purposes, during all phases of the software lifecycle, and for all sizes of systems - to varying degrees.
    [Show full text]
  • Sysml, the Language of MBSE Paul White
    Welcome to SysML, the Language of MBSE Paul White October 8, 2019 Brief Introduction About Myself • Work Experience • 2015 – Present: KIHOMAC / BAE – Layton, Utah • 2011 – 2015: Astronautics Corporation of America – Milwaukee, Wisconsin • 2001 – 2011: L-3 Communications – Greenville, Texas • 2000 – 2001: Hynix – Eugene, Oregon • 1999 – 2000: Raytheon – Greenville, Texas • Education • 2019: OMG OCSMP Model Builder—Fundamental Certification • 2011: Graduate Certification in Systems Engineering and Architecting – Stevens Institute of Technology • 1999 – 2004: M.S. Computer Science – Texas A&M University at Commerce • 1993 – 1998: B.S. Computer Science – Texas A&M University • INCOSE • Chapters: Wasatch (2015 – Present), Chicagoland (2011 – 2015), North Texas (2007 – 2011) • Conferences: WSRC (2018), GLRCs (2012-2017) • CSEP: (2017 – Present) • 2019 INCOSE Outstanding Service Award • 2019 INCOSE Wasatch -- Most Improved Chapter Award & Gold Circle Award • Utah Engineers Council (UEC) • 2019 & 2018 Engineer of the Year (INCOSE) for Utah Engineers Council (UEC) • Vice Chair • Family • Married 14 years • Three daughters (1, 12, & 10) 2 Introduction 3 Our Topics • Definitions and Expectations • SysML Overview • Basic Features of SysML • Modeling Tools and Techniques • Next Steps 4 What is Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE)? Model-based systems engineering (MBSE) is “the formalized application of modeling to support system requirements, design, analysis, verification and validation activities beginning in the conceptual design phase and continuing throughout development and later life cycle phases.” -- INCOSE SE Vision 2020 5 What is Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE)? “Formal systems modeling is standard practice for specifying, analyzing, designing, and verifying systems, and is fully integrated with other engineering models. System models are adapted to the application domain, and include a broad spectrum of models for representing all aspects of systems.
    [Show full text]
  • ACDT: Architected Composite Data Types Trading-In Unfettered Data Access for Improved Execution
    ACDT: Architected Composite Data Types Trading-in Unfettered Data Access for Improved Execution Andres Marquez∗, Joseph Manzano∗, Shuaiwen Leon Song∗, Benoˆıt Meistery Sunil Shresthaz, Thomas St. Johnz and Guang Gaoz ∗Pacific Northwest National Laboratory fandres.marquez,joseph.manzano,[email protected] yReservoir Labs [email protected] zUniversity of Delaware fshrestha,stjohn,[email protected] Abstract— reduction approaches associated with improved data locality, obtained through optimized data and computation distribution. With Exascale performance and its challenges in mind, one ubiquitous concern among architects is energy efficiency. In the SW-stack we foresee the runtime system to have a Petascale systems projected to Exascale systems are unsustainable particular important role to contribute to the solution of the at current power consumption rates. One major contributor power challenge. It is here where the massive concurrency is to system-wide power consumption is the number of memory managed and where judicious data layouts [11] and data move- operations leading to data movement and management techniques ments are orchestrated. With that in mind, we set to investigate applied by the runtime system. To address this problem, we on how to improve efficiency of a massively multithreaded present the concept of the Architected Composite Data Types adaptive runtime system in managing and moving data, and the (ACDT) framework. The framework is made aware of data trade-offs an improved data management efficiency requires. composites, assigning them a specific layout, transformations Specifically, in the context of run-time system (RTS), we and operators. Data manipulation overhead is amortized over a explore the power efficiency potential that data compression larger number of elements and program performance and power efficiency can be significantly improved.
    [Show full text]
  • A Model-Driven Engineering Approach to Support the Verification of Compliance to Safety Standards
    A Model-Driven Engineering Approach to Support the Verification of Compliance to Safety Standards Rajwinder Kaur Panesar-Walawege, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Lionel Briand Simula Research Laboratory, Lysaker, Norway University of Oslo, Norway Email: {rpanesar,mehrdad,briand}@simula.no Abstract—Certification of safety-critical systems according to system development. This means that they will have to well-recognised standards is the norm in many industries where reconstruct the missing evidence after the fact. Doing so the failure of such systems can harm people or the environment. is often very expensive, and the outcomes might be far Certification bodies examine such systems, based on evidence that the system suppliers provide, to ensure that the relevant from satisfactory. On the certifier side, poorly structured and safety risks have been sufficiently mitigated. The evidence is incomplete evidence often leads to significant delays and aimed at satisfying the requirements of the standards used loss of productivity, and further may not allow the certifier for certification, and naturally a key prerequisite for effective to develop enough trust in the system that needs to be collection of evidence is that the supplier be aware of these certified. It is therefore very important to devise a systematic requirements and the evidence they require. This often proves to be a very challenging task because of the sheer size of the methodology, which is amenable to effective automated standards and the fact that the textual standards are amenable support, to specify, manage, and analyze the safety evidence to subjective interpretation. In this paper, we propose an ap- used to demonstrate compliance to standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Interactions
    University of Toronto Department of Computer Science Lecture 15: Modelling System Interactions Interactions with the new system How will people interact with the system? When/Why will they interact with the system? Use Cases introduction to use cases identifying actors identifying cases Advanced features Sequence Diagrams Temporal ordering of events involved in a use case © 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 1 University of Toronto Department of Computer Science Moving towards specification What functions will the new system provide? How will people interact with it? Describe functions from a user’s perspective UML Use Cases Used to show: the functions to be provided by the system which actors will use which functions Each Use Case is: a pattern of behavior that the new system is required to exhibit a sequence of related actions performed by an actor and the system via a dialogue. An actor is: anything that needs to interact with the system: a person a role that different people may play another (external) system. © 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 2 University of Toronto Department of Computer Science Use Case Diagrams Capture the relationships between actors and Use Cases Change a client contact Campaign Staff contact Manager Add a new client Record client payment Accountant © 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 3 University of Toronto Department of Computer Science Notation for Use Case Diagrams Use case Change client contact Staff contact Actor Communication association System boundary © 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook.
    [Show full text]