Ecosystems and Species Diversity Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecosystems and Species Diversity Report United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region Appendix G - Ecosystems and Species Diversity Report Prepared for Land Management Plan Revision December 2012 The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Land Management Plan Revision Environmental Impact Statement Table of Contents G.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ G-1 G.1.1 Viability Evaluation Process ............................................................................................................... G-2 G.1.2 Forestwide Ecological System Sustainability ..................................................................................... G-2 G.1.3 Ecological System Sustainability Characteristics ............................................................................... G-5 Relative Abundance ......................................................................................................................................... G-5 Non-native Invasive Species ............................................................................................................................ G-5 Structure (old-growth forest) ........................................................................................................................... G-6 Structure and Tree Age Diversity .................................................................................................................... G-6 Fire Regime...................................................................................................................................................... G-7 Remoteness (road and trail density) ................................................................................................................. G-7 G.2 Ecological Systems .................................................................................................................................... G-7 G.2.1 Upland Longleaf Pine Forest and Woodland ...................................................................................... G-7 Upland Longleaf Pine Forest and Woodland Ecological System Characteristics ............................................ G-7 Upland Longleaf Pine Forest and Woodland Desired Ecological Condition ................................................... G-8 Upland Longleaf Pine Forest and Woodland Management Strategy ............................................................... G-9 Upland Longleaf Pine Forest and Woodland Key Ecological Attributes ......................................................... G-9 G.2.2 Shortleaf Pine-Oak Forest and Woodland ........................................................................................ G-10 Shortleaf Pine-Oak Forest and Woodland Ecological System Characteristics .............................................. G-10 Shortleaf Pine-Oak Forest and Woodland Desired Ecological Condition ..................................................... G-11 Shortleaf Pine-Oak Forest and Woodland Management Strategy .................................................................. G-11 Shortleaf Pine-Oak Forest and Woodland Key Ecological Attributes ........................................................... G-11 G.2.3 Loblolly Forest .................................................................................................................................. G-12 Loblolly Forest Ecological System Characteristics ....................................................................................... G-12 Loblolly Forest Desired Ecological Condition............................................................................................... G-12 Loblolly Forest Management Strategy ........................................................................................................... G-13 Loblolly Forest Key Ecological Attributes .................................................................................................... G-13 G.2.4 Southern Loblolly-Hardwood Flatwoods .......................................................................................... G-14 Southern Loblolly-Hardwood Flatwoods Ecological System Characteristics ............................................... G-14 Southern Loblolly-Hardwood Flatwoods Desired Ecological Condition....................................................... G-14 Southern Loblolly-Hardwood Flatwoods Management Strategy ................................................................... G-14 Southern Loblolly-Hardwood Flatwoods Key Ecological Attributes ............................................................ G-14 G.2.5 Slash Pine Forest ............................................................................................................................... G-15 Slash Pine Forest Ecological System Characteristics .................................................................................... G-15 Slash Pine Forest Desired Ecological Condition............................................................................................ G-15 Slash Pine Forest Management Strategy ........................................................................................................ G-16 Slash Pine Forest Key Ecological Attributes ................................................................................................. G-16 G.2.6 Northern Dry Upland Hardwood Forest ........................................................................................... G-17 Northern Dry Upland Hardwood Forest Ecological System Characteristics ................................................. G-17 Northern Dry Upland Hardwood Forest Desired Ecological Condition ........................................................ G-17 Northern Dry Upland Hardwood Forest Management Strategy .................................................................... G-17 Northern Dry Upland Hardwood Forest Key Ecological Attributes .............................................................. G-18 G.2.7 Southern Dry Upland Hardwood Forest ........................................................................................... G-18 Southern Dry Upland Hardwood Forest Ecological System Characteristics ................................................. G-18 Southern Dry Upland Hardwood Forest Desired Ecological Condition ........................................................ G-19 Southern Dry Upland Hardwood Forest Management Strategy .................................................................... G-19 Southern Dry Upland Hardwood Forest Key Ecological Attributes .............................................................. G-19 G.2.8 Southern Loess Bluff Forest ............................................................................................................. G-20 Southern Loess Bluff Forest Ecological System Characteristics ................................................................... G-20 Southern Loess Bluff Forest Desired Ecological Condition .......................................................................... G-21 Southern Loess Bluff Forest Management Strategy ...................................................................................... G-21 Southern Loess Bluff Forest Key Ecological Attributes ................................................................................ G-22 G.2.9 Southern Mesic Slope Forest ............................................................................................................ G-22 Southern Mesic Slope Forest Ecological System Characteristics .................................................................. G-22 National Forests in Mississippi G-i Appendix G - Ecosystems and Species Diversity Report Southern Mesic Slope Forest Desired Ecological Condition ......................................................................... G-22 Southern Mesic Slope Forest Management Strategy ..................................................................................... G-23 Southern Mesic Slope Forest Key Ecological Attributes ............................................................................... G-23 G.2.10 Northern Mesic Hardwood Forest .................................................................................................... G-23 Northern Mesic Hardwood Forest Ecological System Characteristics .......................................................... G-23 Northern Mesic Hardwood Forest Desired Ecological Condition ................................................................. G-24 Northern Mesic Hardwood Forest Management Strategy .............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinguishing the Neches River Rose Mallow, Hibiscus Dasycalyx, from Its Congeners Using DNA Sequence Data and Niche Modeling Methods Melody P
    University of Texas at Tyler Scholar Works at UT Tyler Biology Theses Biology Spring 2015 Distinguishing the Neches River Rose Mallow, Hibiscus Dasycalyx, from its Congeners Using DNA Sequence Data and Niche Modeling Methods Melody P. Sain Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uttyler.edu/biology_grad Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Sain, Melody P., "Distinguishing the Neches River Rose Mallow, Hibiscus Dasycalyx, from its Congeners Using DNA Sequence Data and Niche Modeling Methods" (2015). Biology Theses. Paper 26. http://hdl.handle.net/10950/292 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at Scholar Works at UT Tyler. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Works at UT Tyler. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DISTINGUISHING THE NECHES RIVER ROSE MALLOW, HIBISCUS DASYCALYX, FROM ITS CONGENERS USING DNA SEQUENCE DATA AND NICHE MODELING METHODS by MELODY P. SAIN A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Biology Joshua Banta, Ph.D., Committee Chair College of Arts and Sciences The University of Texas at Tyler June 2015 Acknowledgements I would like to give special thanks to my family for their unconditional support and encouragement throughout my academic career. My parents, Douglas and Bernetrice Sain, have always been at my side anytime that I needed that little extra push when things seemed to be too hard. I would also like to thank my little brother, Cody Sain, in always giving me an extra reason to do my best and for always listening to me when I just needed someone to talk to.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing History
    Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 911 Tracing History Phylogenetic, Taxonomic, and Biogeographic Research in the Colchicum Family BY ANNIKA VINNERSTEN ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS UPPSALA 2003 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Lindahlsalen, EBC, Uppsala, Friday, December 12, 2003 at 10:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Vinnersten, A. 2003. Tracing History. Phylogenetic, Taxonomic and Biogeographic Research in the Colchicum Family. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 911. 33 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 91-554-5814-9 This thesis concerns the history and the intrafamilial delimitations of the plant family Colchicaceae. A phylogeny of 73 taxa representing all genera of Colchicaceae, except the monotypic Kuntheria, is presented. The molecular analysis based on three plastid regions—the rps16 intron, the atpB- rbcL intergenic spacer, and the trnL-F region—reveal the intrafamilial classification to be in need of revision. The two tribes Iphigenieae and Uvularieae are demonstrated to be paraphyletic. The well-known genus Colchicum is shown to be nested within Androcymbium, Onixotis constitutes a grade between Neodregea and Wurmbea, and Gloriosa is intermixed with species of Littonia. Two new tribes are described, Burchardieae and Tripladenieae, and the two tribes Colchiceae and Uvularieae are emended, leaving four tribes in the family. At generic level new combinations are made in Wurmbea and Gloriosa in order to render them monophyletic. The genus Androcymbium is paraphyletic in relation to Colchicum and the latter genus is therefore expanded.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennials in the Landscape
    Perennials in the Landscape Home gardeners and commercial landscapers alike are becoming more aware of the rich potential hardy herbaceous perennials have to offer. Perennials just may be the most overlooked group of landscaping plants in our area, and for no good reason. They offer a certain permanency to the landscape, and are virtually unequaled in providing abundant color and interest in return for the care they require. Botanically, perennials are plants which live for more than two years. This, of course, would include trees, turf grasses and shrubs. Horticulturally, though, the term perennial refers to a group of herbaceous (nonwoody) plants most frequently grown for their colorful flowers. Plants possessing bulbs and bulblike structures (corms, tubers, etc.) technically belong to this group, and are often included with them. More frequently they are separated off into their own category, though the dividing line is often blurred. Perennials have probably been under utilized in the South because of a general assumption that they don't do well here. Many perennials, however, thrive under our growing conditions. Just make sure you exercise care in choosing varieties suitably adapted to your situation. Most perennials are completely winter-hardy in the Southeast, although there are a number of tender perennials grown in the Gulf Coastal areas which would not be suitable in areas with colder winters. Conversely, some perennials like peonies do better where winters are colder. Overall, the major limiting factors for tolerance and susceptibility to diseases favored by heat and humidity. When selecting perennials, you should tend toward those with a reputation for heat tolerance.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora and Vegetation Classification of the South Atlantic Coastal Plain Limestone Forest Association of Central Georgia
    VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH (Under the Direction of J.L. Hamrick) ABSTRACT The South Atlantic Coastal Plain Limestone forest is a globally imperiled (G2) forest association known only from the upper Coastal Plain of central Georgia. These calcareous forest communities support diverse floristic assemblages unique among the Georgia Coastal Plain, but have not been subject to detailed floristic study. I conducted a comprehensive floristic inventory, multivariate community analyses and floristic quality assessments to document composition, elucidate community structure and underlying physiographic regimes, and assess habitat integrity for seven sites in Houston, Bleckley and Twiggs counties. Community analyses revealed twelve community types within two floristically defined domains corresponding to uplands and slopes, and bottomlands, respectively, and governed largely by moisture content and degree of inclination. Floristic quality assessments revealed varying degrees of floristic quality and habitat integrity corresponding primarily to local physiography and disturbance history. Floristic inventory recovered 339 vascular plant taxa representing 218 genera in 98 families, including 17 rare Georgia species. INDEX WORDS: Limestone forest, community analysis, floristic inventory, floristic quality assessment, Georgia, Coastal Plain. VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH B.S., The University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 2006 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2010 © 2012 Patrick Sumner Lynch All Rights Reserved VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH Major Professor: J.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Rain Garden Plant List
    Rain Garden Plant List This is by no means a complete list of the many plants suitable for your rain garden: Native or Botanical Name Common Name Category Naturalized Wet Zone Acer rubrum var. drummondii Southern Swamp Maple Tree Any Acorus calamus Sweet Flag Grass Any Adiantum capillus-veneris Southern Maidenhair Fern Fern Median Aesculus pavia Scarlet Buckeye Tree Yes Any Alstromeria pulchella Peruvian Lily Perennial Any Amorpha fruticosa False Indigo Wildflower Yes Any Andropogon gerardi Big Bluestem Grass Yes Median Andropogon scoparius Little Bluestem Grass Yes Median Aniscanthus wrightii Flame Acanthus Shrub Yes Median Aquilegia canadensis Columbine, Red Wildflower Yes Median Aquilegia ciliata Texas Blue Star Wildflower Yes Median Aquilegia hinckleyana Columbine, Hinckley's Perennial Median, Margin Aquilegia longissima Columbine, Longspur Wildflower Yes Center Asclepias tuberosa Butterfly Weed Wildflower Yes Margin Asimina triloba Pawpaw Tree Any Betula nigra River Birch Tree Yes Any Bignonia capreolata Crossvine Vine Yes Any Callicarpa americana American Beautyberry Shrub Yes Any Canna spp. Canna Lily Perennial No Any Catalpa bignonioides Catalpa Tree Yes Any Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Yes Any Chasmanthus latifolium Inland Sea Oats Grass Yes Median, Margin Cyrilla recemiflora Leatherwood or Titi Tree Tree Yes Median, Margin Clematis pitcheri Leatherflower Vine Yes Any Crataegus reverchonii Hawthorn Tree Yes Any Crinum spp. Crinum Perennial Any Delphinium virescens Prairie Larkspur Wildflower Yes Any Dryoptera normalis
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant Starter List Meg Gaffney-Cooke Blue Leaf Design [email protected] Meg's Native Plant Starter List
    Native Plant Starter List Meg Gaffney-Cooke Blue Leaf Design [email protected] Meg's Native Plant Starter List UPLAND/SANDY SOILS MOIST SOILS Easy Grasses & Perennials Easy Grasses & Perennials Color Find Botanical Name Common Name Color Find Botanical Name Common Name Amsonia ciliata Blue Dogbane Amsonia tabernaemontana Bluestar Asclepias humistrata Pinewood Milkweed Aster caroliniana Climbing Aster x Asclepias tuberosa Butterfly Weed Hibiscus coccineus Scarlet Hibiscus Conradina grandiflora Scrub Mint Helianthus angustifolius Narrow Leaved Sunflower Echinacea purpurea Purple Cone Flower x Stokesia laevis Stokes Aster Eragrostis spectabilis Purple Love Grass Iris virginica Blue Flag Iris Eryngium yuccifolium Rattlesnake Master x Thelypteris kunthii Southern Wood Fern Helianthus angustifolius Narrow Leaved Sunflower Sisyrinchium sp Suwanee Blue-Eyed Grass Hypericum reductum St Johns Wort x Spartina bakeri Sand Cord Grass x Muhlenbergia capillaris Muhley Grass Mimosa strigulosa Sunshine Mimosa Phyla nodiflira Frogfruit x Lonicera sempervirens Coral Honeysuckle Liatris spicata Blazing Star x Canna falcida Yellow Canna Rudbeckia hirta Black Eyed Susan Chasmanthium latifolia Upland River Oats Scutellaria integrifolia Skullcap x Crinum americanum Swamp Lily/String Lily x Spartina bakeri Sand Cord Grass x Tripsacum dactyloides Fakahatchee Grass x Tripsacum dactyloides Fakahatchee Grass x Gaillardia pulchella Blanket Flower Monarda punctata Dotted Horsemint gardenclubjax.org 1005 Riverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 32204 904-355-4224
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Isoetes
    BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ISOETES ALLEN, B.M. 1975. A note on the distribution of Isoetes in the Cadiz Province, Spain. Fern Gaz. (U.K.) 11 (2-3): 163-164 (1975). ALONSO, PAZ, E. 1989. Notas sobre plantas nuevas o interesantes para la flora Uruguaya: 1. (Notes on new or interesting plants for the Uruguayan flora: 1.) Comun. Bot. Mus. Hist. Nat. Montevideo 5 (91): 1-4 (1989) - Isoetes pp.2-3 ALSTON, A.H.G. 1982. Isoetaceae: 1. In Steenis, C.G.G.J. van, Holttum, R. E., eds. Flora Malesiana, series 2. Pteridophytes, volume 1. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, Dr. W. Junk Publ. 62-64 (1982)- illus., chrom. nos., key. ANDREIS, C., RODONDI, G. 1987. Alcune stazioni di Isoetes echinospora Dur. nel Bresciano e osservazioni al SEM delle spore delle Isoetes della flora Italica. Natura Bresciana no.23: 119-130 (1986 publ. 1987) - illus., maps. 4, ANTHONY, N.C., & E.A. SCHELPE, 1985. Two new taxa and a new combination in southern African Pteridophyta. Bothalia, 15 (3 & 4): 554-555 (1985) ARREGUIN-SANCHEZ, M., 1986. Nuevos registros y taxa interesantes de pteridofitas del Valle de Mexico. (Isoetaceae, Psilotaceae y Selaginellaceae) Phytologia 59 (7): 451-453 (1986) ASH, S., & K.B. PIGG. 1991. A new Jurassic Isoetites (Isoetales) from the Wallowa Terrane in Hells Canyon Oregon and Idaho. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 1636-1642. BAJPAI, U., & H.K. MAHESHWARI,1985. EM studies on the megaspores of Isoetes coromandelina. Phytomorphology, 34 (1-4): 226-231 (1984 publ. 1985) - illus. BALDWIN, W.K.W. 1933. The organization of the young sporophyte of Isoetes engelmanni, A.
    [Show full text]
  • April Plant List 2015
    Page 1 of 22 Compiled by Mary Ann Tonnacliff Demonstration Garden Plant List April 2015 Plant # Bed Scientific Name Common Name Native Dormant Annual 1 1 Acer palmatum 'Omure yama' Japanese maple 'Omure yama' 2 1 Acer rubrum Red maple, swamp maple N 3 1 Achimenes spp. Orchid pansy D 4 1 Alpinia zerumbet Variegated shell ginger 5 1 Aspidistra elatior Cast iron plant 6 1 Aucuba japonica Gold dust aucuba, Japanese aucuba 7 1 Aucuba japonica 'Mr.Goldstrike' Japanese aucuba 8 1 Begonia semperflorens x hybrida Super Olympia® Rose Wax begonia A 9 1 Begonia semperflorens x hybrida Super Olympia® White Waqx begonia A 10 1 Caladium x hortulanum 'White Queen' Fancy-leaved caladium 11 1 Caladium x hortulatum 'Candidum' Fancy-leaved caladium D 12 1 Camellia sasanqua 'Dream Quilt' Camellia 13 1 Carex morrowii Japanese sedge 14 1 Cleyera japonica Japanese cleyera 15 1 Crinum asiaticum Grand crinum lily 16 1 Crocosmia x crocosmiiflora Montbretia 17 1 Dianella tasmanica ‘ Variegata’ Variegated flax lily 18 1 Dietes vegeta African iris 19 1 Euphorbia hypericifolia x 'Silver Shadow' 20 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash N 21 1 Hydrangea macrophylla 'Lemon Daddy' Lemon Daddy Hydrangea 22 1 Hydrangea macrophylla 'Variegata' Variegated lacecap hydrangea 23 1 Hydrangea paniculata 'Limelight' Limelight hydrangea 24 1 Hydrangea paniculata 'Little Lime' Little Lime hydrangea 25 1 Ilex vomitoria ' Nana' Dwarf yaupon holly N Spreadsheets prepared by Links provided by Jim Roberts Katherine LaRosa and Mary Ann Tonnacliff Page 2 of 22 Compiled by Mary Ann Tonnacliff
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Domain Management Plan
    Domain Management Plan 2019-2029 FINAL DRAFT 12/20/2019 Owner Contact: Amy Turner, Ph.D., CWB Director of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability The University of the South Sewanee, Tennessee Office: 931-598-1447 Office: Cleveland Annex 110C Email: [email protected] Reviewed by: The Nature Conservancy Forest Stewards Guild ____________________________________________________________________________ Tract Location: Franklin and Marion Counties, Tennessee Centroid Latitude 35.982963 Longitude -85.344382 Tract Size: 13,036 acres | 5,275 hectares Land Manager: Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability, The University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee 2 Executive Summary The primary objective of this management plan is to provide a framework to outline future management and outline operations for the Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability (OESS) over the next ten years. In this plan, we will briefly introduce the physical and biological setting, past land use, and current uses of the Domain. The remainder of the plan consists of an assessment of the forest, which has been divided into six conservation areas. These conservation areas contain multiple management compartments, and the six areas have similarities in topographical position and past land use. Finally, the desired future condition and project summary of each conservation area and compartment has been outlined. Background The University of the South consists of an academic campus (382 acres) with adjacent commercial and residential areas (783 acres) that are embedded within and surrounded by diverse natural lands (11,838 acres). The term “Domain” is used interchangeably to describe both the entire ~13,000 acres and the 11,800-acre natural land matrix (also referred to as the “Greater Domain”).
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Natural Heritage Program Special Plants - Tracking List -2018
    MISSISSIPPI NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM SPECIAL PLANTS - TRACKING LIST -2018- Approximately 3300 species of vascular plants (fern, gymnosperms, and angiosperms), and numerous non-vascular plants may be found in Mississippi. Many of these are quite common. Some, however, are known or suspected to occur in low numbers; these are designated as species of special concern, and are listed below. There are 495 special concern plants, which include 4 non- vascular plants, 28 ferns and fern allies, 4 gymnosperms, and 459 angiosperms 244 dicots and 215 monocots. An additional 100 species are designated “watch” status (see “Special Plants - Watch List”) with the potential of becoming species of special concern and include 2 fern and fern allies, 54 dicots and 44 monocots. This list is designated for the primary purposes of : 1) in environmental assessments, “flagging” of sensitive species that may be negatively affected by proposed actions; 2) determination of protection priorities of natural areas that contain such species; and 3) determination of priorities of inventory and protection for these plants, including the proposed listing of species for federal protection. GLOBAL STATE FEDERAL SPECIES NAME COMMON NAME RANK RANK STATUS BRYOPSIDA Callicladium haldanianum Callicladium Moss G5 SNR Leptobryum pyriforme Leptobryum Moss G5 SNR Rhodobryum roseum Rose Moss G5 S1? Trachyxiphium heteroicum Trachyxiphium Moss G2? S1? EQUISETOPSIDA Equisetum arvense Field Horsetail G5 S1S2 FILICOPSIDA Adiantum capillus-veneris Southern Maidenhair-fern G5 S2 Asplenium
    [Show full text]
  • Scarlet Hibiscus (Hibiscus Coccineus)
    Scarlet hibiscus (Hibiscus coccineus) For definitions of botanical terms, visit en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_botanical_terms. Scarlet hibiscus (also known as Scarlet rosemallow) is an herbaceous to semi-woody perennial wildflower that is common along wetland and stream edges, and in swamps and other wet, open sites. In late summer, it produces large, crimson blooms that remain open for only one day. Scarlet rosemallow is a profuse bloomer, however, and will typically produce many flowers throughout the summer. The plant is a larval host for several butterflies and moths including the Painter lady and Tropical checkered skipper butterflies and the Io moth. The flowers are very attractive to hummingbirds, butterflies and other pollinators. Scarlet hibiscus flowers are large (4 to 8 inches in Photo by Stacey Matrazzo diameter) with five bright red petals, a five-lobed green calyx, and linear bracts. Flowers are born in leaf axils. Leaves are glabrous, palmate and deeply lobed with long petioles. Margins are toothed, and leaf arrangement is alternate. Stems and petioles may be reddish. Seeds are born in ovoid five-celled capsules. Each cell may contain many seeds. The genus name Hibiscus is from the Greek hibiskos, or “mallow.” The species epithet coccineus is from the Greek kókkinos, meaning “scarlet red.” Family: Malvaceae (Mallow family) Native range: Eastern Panhandle, north and central peninsula, Collier, Broward and Okaloosa counties To see where natural populations of Scarlet hibiscus have been vouchered, visit www.florida.plantatlas.usf.edu. Hardiness: Zones 8A–11 Lifespan: Perennial Soil: Moist to wet or inundated, rich soils; can be acclimated to well-drained soils with enough moisture Exposure: Full sun to partial shade Growth habit: 3–7’+ tall with 2–5’ spread Propagation: Seeds, cuttings Garden tips: Scarlet hibiscus is one of our showiest native wildflowers.
    [Show full text]