DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Annual Report 2014 Annual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MIT LINCOLN LABORATORY LINCOLN MIT www.ll.mit.edu Communications and Community Outreach Office: 781.981.4204 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This work is sponsored by the Department of the Air Force under Air Force Contract FA8721-05-C-0002. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the United States Government. TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL SECURITY Follow MIT Lincoln Laboratory online. Facebook: MIT Lincoln Laboratory (Official) LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/company/mit-lincoln-laboratory Twitter: @MITLL 2014 Annual2014 Report MIT Lincoln Laboratory TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL SECURITY 20ANNUAL REPORT 14 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Space Surveillance Complex, Westford, Massachusetts MIT Lincoln Laboratory Reagan Test Site, Kwajalein Atoll, Marshall Islands MIT LINCOLN LABORATORY 2014 Table of Contents MISSION 2 Leadership Technology in Support 3 Organizational Changes 4 Letter from the Director of National Security 5 Strategic Directions MIT Lincoln Laboratory employs some of the 7 Technology Innovation 8 Technology Investments nation’s best technical talent to support system and 15 Beaver Works Humanitarian Workshop technology development for national security needs. 16 Multifunction Phased Array Radar Principal core competencies are sensors, infor- 18 Airborne Collision Avoidance System X mation extraction (signal processing and embedded 20 Haystack Ultrawideband Satellite Imaging computing), communications, integrated sensing, and Radar Ribbon-Cutting Ceremony decision support. Nearly all of the Lincoln Laboratory 22 Technology Transfer efforts are housed at its campus on Hanscom Air 24 Effective, Efficient R&D Force Base in Massachusetts. 27 Economic Impact 28 R&D 100 Awards MIT Lincoln Laboratory is designated a Department 31 Mission Areas of Defense (DoD) Federally Funded Research and 32 Space Control Development Center (FFRDC) and a DoD Research and 34 Air and Missile Defense Technology Development Laboratory. The Laboratory conducts 36 Communication Systems research and development pertinent to national 38 Cyber Security and Information Sciences security on behalf of the military Services, the Office of 40 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Systems and Technology the Secretary of Defense, the intelligence community, 42 Tactical Systems and other government agencies. Projects undertaken 44 Advanced Technology by Lincoln Laboratory focus on the development and 46 Homeland Protection prototyping of new technologies and capabilities 48 Air Traffic Control to meet government needs that cannot be met as 50 Engineering effectively by the government’s existing in-house or 53 Laboratory Involvement contractor resources. Program activities extend from 54 Technical Education fundamental investigations through design and field 62 Awards and Recognition testing of prototype systems using new technologies. 65 Diversity and Inclusion A strong emphasis is placed on the transition of 69 Educational and Community Outreach systems and technology to the private sector. Lincoln 70 Educational Outreach Laboratory has been in existence for 63 years. On its 75 Robotics Outreach 25th and 50th anniversaries, the Laboratory received 76 Community Giving the Secretary of Defense Medal for Outstanding Public 79 Laboratory Governance and Organization Service in recognition of its distinguished technical 80 Laboratory Governance and Organization innovation and scientific discoveries. 81 Advisory Board 82 Staff and Laboratory Programs MIT and Lincoln Laboratory Leadership ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES Massachusetts Institute of Technology Israel Soibelman Kevin P. Cohen Assistant to the Director for Strategic Initiatives Assistant Division Head, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Dr. L. Rafael Reif Dr. Israel Soibelman was appointed Assistant Reconnaissance and Tactical Systems President to the Director for Strategic Initiatives. In Dr. Kevin P. Cohen was appointed assistant Dr. Martin A. Schmidt (left) this position, he is responsible for helping to head of the Intelligence, Surveillance, and Provost establish Laboratory-level strategic plans, to Reconnaissance and Tactical Systems Dr. Maria T. Zuber develop external strategic relationships, and to Division. Prior to this appointment, he served Vice President for Research lead strategic initiatives in targeted areas. as the leader of the Advanced Capabilities and Systems Group. Melissa G. Choi Division Head, Homeland Protection and Air Traffic Control Joseph Dolan Dr. Melissa G. Choi was appointed head of the Department Head, Facility Services Homeland Protection and Air Traffic Control Joseph Dolan was named the head of the Division. She is responsible for research, devel- Facility Services Department, with responsi- opment, and technology transfer of systems bility for the operations and maintenance of designed to help safeguard the homeland from the entire Lincoln Laboratory complex. He has terrorist activities and disasters, and to help had 18 years of experience in the department, ensure the safety of the national airspace. including serving as its chief engineer and as the assistant department head. Edward C. Wack Assistant Division Head, Homeland Protection and Air Traffic Robert T-I. Shin Control Director, MIT Lincoln Laboratory Beaver Works Edward C. Wack was named assistant head Dr. Robert T-I. Shin was appointed the Director of the Homeland Protection and Air Traffic of MIT Lincoln Laboratory Beaver Works by MIT Lincoln Laboratory Control Division. Prior to this appointment, the Dean of the MIT School of Engineering he served as the leader of the Bioengineering and the Director of Lincoln Laboratory. He was Dr. Eric D. Evans Systems and Technologies Group. also named a member of the MIT School of Director Engineering Extended Engineering Council. Dr. Marc D. Bernstein (left) Associate Director Justin J. Brooke Mr. C. Scott Anderson (right) Division Head, Air and Missile Defense Technology MIT Lincoln Laboratory Fellow Assistant Director for Operations Dr. Justin J. Brooke was appointed head of the The Fellow position recognizes the Laboratory’s strongest technical Air and Missile Defense Technology Division. talent for their outstanding contributions over many years. He is responsible for the development and assessment of systems for defense against Richard P. Lippmann ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and air Dr. Richard P. Lippmann has made key contribu- vehicles. tions to Lincoln Laboratory’s programs in speech recognition and cyber security. He is an inter- Katherine A. Rink nationally recognized leader in neural networks Assistant Division Head, Air and Missile Defense Technology and pattern classification and has pioneered Dr. Katherine A. Rink was named assistant innovative technology for cyber security. head of the Air and Missile Defense Technology Division. Prior to this appointment, she served He has authored or coauthored more than 100 papers, reports, as the leader of the Advanced Concepts and or books. His article “An Introduction to Computing with Neural Technologies Group. Nets” earned the first IEEE Signal Processing Magazine Best Paper Award and has been cited more than 6000 times. He is a 2011 recipient of an MIT Lincoln Laboratory Technical Excellence Award. 2 2014 Annual Report MIT Lincoln Laboratory 3 Letter from the Director MIT Lincoln Laboratory MISSION: TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL SECURITY Lincoln Laboratory continues to work on large-scale hardware ■■ A Laboratory-developed three-dimensional ladar, designed and software prototyping projects that incorporate advanced to uncover activity in heavily foliated areas, achieved high VISION STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS technology and new system architectures. To pull in the best collection rates that were made possible by dual Geiger-mode ideas wherever we can find them, we continue to do projects avalanche photodiode arrays. To be the nation’s premier laboratory for developing advanced ■■ Identify new mission areas, based on current and emerging that involve much collaboration inside and outside of the technology and system prototypes for national security national security needs Laboratory. The speed of change for commercial and defense ■■ New network- and transport-layer protocols enabled efficient ■■ To work in the most relevant and difficult technical areas technology is increasing, and the emphasis on rapid devel- transport of data over communications links degraded by ■■ Strengthen and evolve the current Laboratory mission areas opment is spreading to many of our programs. outages caused by mobility or jamming. ■■ To strive for highly effective program execution in all phases ■■ Strengthen the core technology programs To adapt to current and future national security needs, we have ■■ For a new solid-state S-band Air and Missile Defense Radar created programs that cut across division lines; invested in being developed by the Navy, the Laboratory prototyped and VALUES ■■ Increase MIT campus/Lincoln Laboratory collaboration laboratories that can be used in multiple domains; and upgraded tested the radar’s end-to-end ballistic missile defense discrimi- ■■ facilities to promote the fabrication of new, state-of-the-art nation architecture. Technical Excellence: The Laboratory is committed to technical excellence through the people it hires and through its system and ■■ Strengthen technology transfer to acquisition and user devices. The recent reorganization of our Advanced
Recommended publications
  • MIT Museum Announces New Exhibition of Holograms and the 9Th International Symposium on Display Holography

    MIT Museum Announces New Exhibition of Holograms and the 9Th International Symposium on Display Holography

    Press Advisory Contact Josie Patterson 617-253-4422, [email protected] Press Images - PDF MIT Museum Announces New Exhibition of Holograms and the 9th International Symposium on Display Holography CAMBRIDGE, MA - The MIT Museum announces the opening on June 27, 2012 of The Jeweled Net: Views of Contemporary Holography, an exhibition created in conjunction with the 9th International Symposium on Display Holography, co-sponsored by the MIT Museum and the MIT Media Lab. Over 20 holograms created by international artists, as well as several from the MIT Museum collections, will be on display, and will remain open to the public through September 28, 2013. The exhibition presents a rare opportunity to view selected works from the world-wide community of practicing display holographers. The MIT Museum holds the world’s largest and most comprehensive collection of holograms and regularly invites artists to showcase new work at the Museum. "This new exhibition is an example of our expanded commitment to support public engagement with practicing artists through exhibitions and programs," says Seth Riskin, who will give talks and tours throughout the coming year in his role as the MIT Museum’s Manager of Emerging Technologies and Holography/Spatial Imaging Initiatives. The Jeweled Net: Views of Contemporary Holography surveys state-of-the-art display holography, and showcases the artistic and technical merit of individual works of art. Selected by a panel of experts, the holograms on display represent artists from Germany, Italy, the UK, Canada, Australia, Japan, and the US. Holography has given birth to a new field of science during the past six decades, and as well, to a group of 'pioneers' who have found a new media upon which human vision in three dimensions is transferred.
  • Advanced Imaging Technology

    Advanced Imaging Technology

    MICROELECTRONICS LABORATORY SPOTLIGHT ON Advanced Imaging Technology KEY FEATURES • World’s lowest readout noise, Digital focal plane array. highest quantum efficiency CCD imagers MIT Lincoln Laboratory has long been a leader • Geiger-mode (GM) APDs with in advanced imaging for defense and scientific single-photon sensitivity and applications. Our imaging capabilities are broadly noiseless digital readout classified into three categories: charge-coupled • DFPAs containing a complete devices (CCDs), avalanche photodiodes (APDs), analog-to-digital converter in every pixel, enabling image and digital focal plane array (DFPA) technology. processing on the focal plane Technology in Support of National Security www.ll.mit.edu SPOTLIGHT ON Advanced Imaging Technology Charge-Coupled Devices Our CCDs are used in ground, air, and spaced-based applications of interest to the government and scientific research community. These CCDs span a range of wavelengths including visible, near infrared, ultraviolet, and soft X-ray. Among imagers employing our CCDs are the two 1.4-billion- pixel Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System’s (Pan-STARRS) focal plane arrays, the largest focal planes fabricated to date, and the Space Surveillance Telescope’s curved focal planes that provide a uniform and wide field of view. Optical micrograph of back-illuminated CCD wafer. Geiger-Mode Avalanche Photodiodes For passive imaging, the noiseless readout of our GM-APDs enables photon counting, providing both the requisite sensitivity for low-light applications and photon count rates for high-speed imaging. APDs are also employed in active ladar systems to time-stamp photon arrival times, enabling 3D imaging in compact airborne systems. We also fabricate APD arrays on compound semiconductor materials, expanding these capabilities further into the infrared.
  • Classmate Biographies

    Classmate Biographies

    CLASSMATE BIOGRAPHIES 38 David Jeffrey Abeshouse Course: VIII Tell us about your recollections of your student years at MIT: I lived in Student House, which is essentially on the B.U. campus. If I recall correctly, it was a mile walk to MIT. That walk, in all kinds of weather, is one of my strongest, if not favorable, memories of my years there. Unless something unusual happened, I made the round trip just once a day. Student House is near Kenmore Square and Fenway Park. The gates to Fenway would open in the sixth inning then, and there were mostly afternoon games, so we would go up to the park occasionally to see, for free, the last three innings. We saw Ted Williams regularly. Student House was also next to the Charles, and it was fun to go down near the river in pleasant weather. I struggled to survive academically, but I did it. I don't remember the name of the professor who lectured our freshman chemistry course, but he spoke in a monotone, and I fell asleep practically every time. I finally went to a different lecture section. I have a poor sense of direction and was regularly lost around the campus and often rushing to get to class. Once in my sophomore year I was rushing and rounded a corner and almost flattened Norbert Wiener. He had a large abdomen, and, from my point of view, the collision was soft. The work on my senior paper was done in building 20. That was a fine place to spend a lot of time.
  • MIT Lincoln Laboratory Division and Group Descriptions

    MIT Lincoln Laboratory Division and Group Descriptions

    MIT Lincoln Laboratory Division and Group Descriptions October 2012 AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY DIVISION 3 The Air and Missile Defense Technology Division’s role is to work with government, industry, and laboratories to develop an integrated air and missile defense system. The division’s main focus is investigating system concepts, developing technology, building prototypes, and conducting measurements to support the development of radar and optical sensors, interceptors, and networks for air and missile defense systems. A strong emphasis is placed on partnerships and the transfer of technology to industry. Group 31—Systems and Architectures The Systems and Architectures Group examines near- and long-term technology opportunities for charting the future development of U.S. air and missile defenses. As the country proceeds with the deployment of new missile defense systems, Lincoln Laboratory and this group are working on the next generation of architectures and technologies. The group investigates advanced radar concepts, new infrared sensors, missile designs, space-based platforms, and future distributed command-and-control software to help identify opportunities to develop, test, and deploy these technologies. The group also devotes considerable effort to investigating the impact of various countermeasures on U.S. air and missile defense systems, particularly with respect to various types of electronic warfare. Staff members in the group have a wide variety of backgrounds, including physics, electrical engineering, mathematics, and astrodynamics. Group 33—Advanced Sensor Systems and Test Beds The Advanced Sensor Systems and Test Beds Group supports the Department of Defense by designing and developing modern sensor systems and components to support airborne air defense radars as well as the ballistic missile defense system.
  • Extreme Customization

    Extreme Customization

    William J. Mitchell, Frank T. Piller, Mitchell Tseng, Ryan Chin, Betty Lou McClanahan (Editors) Extreme Customization Proceedings of the MCPC 2007 World Conference on Mass Customization & Personalization October 7-9, 2007 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology October 11-12, 2007 at the HEC Business School Montreal www.mcpc2007.com Notes 2 Proceedings of the 2007 World Conference on Mass Customization & Personalization Contents Welcome to the MCPC 2007 .......................................................................................................6 MCPC 2007 Conference Overview & Schedule ........................................................................7 About the MCPC Conference Series .......................................................................................12 MCPC 2007 Conference Team..................................................................................................13 MCPC 2007 Hosting Organizations .........................................................................................16 MCPC 2007: Sponsors & Supporters of the MIT Conference ...............................................17 The MIT Smart Customization Group ......................................................................................18 MCPC 2007 Conference Presentations ...................................................................................19 1 Keynote Plenary Presentations.......................................................................................20 2 MCP Showcase & Panel Sessions ..................................................................................24
  • 2-Page-Tree-Saving Format

    2-Page-Tree-Saving Format

    M P Corp. SS&C Conf. .O. Box 8236 Box .O. onterey, CA 93943 CA onterey, FORTY-SIXTH ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTERS November 4–7, 2012 Asilomar Hotel and Conference Grounds Technical Co-sponsor FORTY-SIXTH Welcome from the General Chairman ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON Prof. Miloš Doroslovački SIGNALS, SYstEMS & COMPUTERS The George Washington University Welcome to this unique conference. Many of us come here from year to year to be exposed to new ideas and to do brainstorming Organized in cooperation with about them in an informal and relaxed way, surrounded by magnificent nature. To cite John Steinbeck, Nobel Prize laureate in literature and local to this part of California: “Ideas are like ATK SPACE SYstEMS rabbits. You get a couple and learn how to handle them, and pretty Monterey, California soon you have a dozen.” I am sure that the conference will be stimulating for your future professional endeavors. and Technical Co-sponsor The biggest credit for the intellectual value of the conference goes to the Technical Program Chair Erik G. Larsson and his team, made of Technical Area Chairs and Session Chairs, as well as to IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING SOCIETY all of you who contributed with papers. Erik and his team prepared an excellent program of 435 papers, including 171 invited, and a tutorial session. For their outstanding work in shaping the technical program, I would like to thank Erik and the Technical Area Chairs: Henk Wymeersch, Gerald Matz, Vincent Poor, Erchin Serpedin, Marius Pesavento, Arye Nehorai, Joseph Cavallaro, Ghassan CONFERENCE COMMITTEE AlRegib and Phil Schniter.
  • Case 3:15-Cv-30024-MGM Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 32

    Case 3:15-Cv-30024-MGM Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 32

    Case 3:15-cv-30024-MGM Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN DIVISION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE DEAF, on behalf of its members, C. WAYNE DORE, CIVIL ACTION NO. CHRISTY SMITH, LEE NETTLES, and DIANE NETTLES, on behalf of themselves and CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR a proposed class of similarly situated persons DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE defined below, RELIEF Plaintiffs, v. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Defendant. Plaintiffs, the National Association of the Deaf, on behalf of its members, and C. Wayne Dore, Christy Smith, Lee Nettles, and Diane Nettles, on behalf of themselves and a proposed class defined below, by and through undersigned counsel, file their Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and respectfully allege as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. Defendant Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT” or “the Institute” or “Defendant”) makes available a variety of online content on websites that have received, to date, at least 125 million visitors.1 MIT makes thousands of videos and audio tracks publicly available for free to anyone with an Internet connection, on broad-ranging topics of educational or general interest. With only a few keystrokes, anyone can access videos ranging from campus talks by President Obama, Noam Chomsky and other “Laureates and Luminaries,” to introductory classes 1 MIT, About OpenCourseWare, http://ocw.mit.edu/about/ (accessed February 3, 2015). Case 3:15-cv-30024-MGM Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 2 of 32 in topics such as computer programming, to higher-level classes in topics such as business and mathematics, to educational videos made by MIT students for use by K-12 students.
  • 2016 Annual Report (Pdf)

    2016 Annual Report (Pdf)

    MIT LINCOLN LABORATORY LINCOLN MIT Follow MIT Lincoln Laboratory online. Facebook: MIT Lincoln Laboratory LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/company/ mit-lincoln-laboratory Twitter: @MITLL YouTube: MIT Lincoln Laboratory Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ lincoln_laboratory/ 2016 Annual2016 Report MIT Lincoln Laboratory 2016 ANNUAL REPORT www.ll.mit.edu Communications and Community Outreach Office: 781.981.4204 Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. This material is based upon work supported under Air Force Contract No. FA8721-05-C-0002 and/or FA8702-15-D-0001. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Air Force. TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL SECURITY © 2016 Massachusetts Institute of Technology TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL SECURITY Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Space Surveillance Complex, Westford, Massachusetts MIT Lincoln Laboratory Reagan Test Site, Kwajalein Atoll, Marshall Islands MIT LINCOLN LABORATORY 2016 Table of Contents MISSION 2 Leadership Technology in Support 3 Organizational Changes of National Security 4 Letter from the Director 5 Vision, Values, and Strategic Directions MIT Lincoln Laboratory employs some of the nation’s best technical talent to support system and 7 Technology Innovation technology development for national security needs. 8 Swarm of Miniature Aircraft Autonomously Maintains Flight Formation Principal core competencies are sensors, infor- 10 Technology Investments mation extraction (signal processing and embedded 16 Achieving a Near-Ideal Laser Beam computing), communications, integrated sensing, and 18 Localizing Ground-Penetrating Radar decision support. Nearly all of the Lincoln Laboratory 20 Discovering the Vast Asteroid Population efforts are housed at its campus on Hanscom Air 22 Technology Transfer Force Base in Massachusetts.
  • Directions to MIT Lincoln Laboratory E Receiving Dock Hours of Operation: Monday Through Friday, 8:00AM - 4:00PM

    Directions to MIT Lincoln Laboratory E Receiving Dock Hours of Operation: Monday Through Friday, 8:00AM - 4:00PM

    MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LINCOLN LABORATORY 244 WOOD STREET LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02421-6426 Directions to MIT Lincoln Laboratory E Receiving Dock Hours of operation: Monday through Friday, 8:00AM - 4:00PM From I-95/Rte. 128, take Exit 30B, Route 2A West Hanscom Field exit. Follow Route 2A West for 1.5 miles to a blinking yellow light. Turn right and go ¼ of a mile, then bear right and you will come to the Sartain Gate (formerly Vandenberg Gate). You are entering a US Air Force Base. All commercial vehicles must follow the guidelines listed below: Commercial vehicle access is allowed Monday through Friday only, from 6:00AM to 5:30PM. Commercial vehicle access and deliveries are not allowed on weekends. If the commercial vehicle is larger than a passenger van and/or towing a trailer, it must proceed to the Commercial Vehicle Search Area located at the Sartain Gate to be searched. Search area hours are Monday through Friday only, from 6:00AM to 5:30PM. The Air Force guards will inspect your papers and your vehicle. You will need a valid driver’s license and proof of insurance for your vehicle. If you are making a delivery to MIT Lincoln Laboratory, you must have a computer generated bill of lading. Bills of lading or invoices must have a “deliver on” date that matches the date the vehicle is at the gate, or a “deliver by date” in the near future, or the vehicle will not be allowed to enter the Base. After you are cleared by the Air Force: Go straight until you come to a fork in the road.
  • Each Cadet Squadron Is Sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below Is The

    Each Cadet Squadron Is Sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below Is The

    Each Cadet Squadron is sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below is the listing for the Cadet Squadron and the Sponsor Unit CS SPONSOR WING BASE MAJCOM 1 1st Fighter Wing 1 FW Langley AFB VA ACC 2 388th Fighter Wing 388 FW Hill AFB UT ACC 3 60th Air Mobility Wing 60 AMW Travis AFB CA AMC 4 15th Wing 15 WG Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam PACAF 5 12th Flying Training Wing 12 FTW Randolph AFB TX AETC 6 4th Fighter Wing 4 FW Seymour Johonson AFB NC ACC 7 49th Fighter Wing 49 FW Holloman AFB NM ACC 8 46th Test Wing 46 TW Eglin AFB FL AFMC 9 23rd Wing 23 WG Moody AFB GA ACC 10 56th Fighter Wing 56 FW Luke AFB AZ AETC 11 55th Wing AND 11th Wing 55WG AND 11WG Offutt AFB NE AND Andrews AFB ACC 12 325th Fighter Wing 325 FW Tyndall AFB FL AETC 13 92nd Air Refueling Wing 92 ARW Fairchild AFB WA AMC 14 412th Test Wing 412 TW Edwards AFB CA AFMC 15 355th Fighter Wing 375 AMW Scott AFB IL AMC 16 89th Airlift Wing 89 AW Andrews AFB MD AMC 17 437th Airlift Wing 437 AW Charleston AFB SC AMC 18 314th Airlift Wing 314 AW Little Rock AFB AR AETC 19 19th Airlift Wing 19 AW Little Rock AFB AR AMC 20 20th Fighter Wing 20 FW Shaw AFB SC ACC 21 366th Fighter Wing AND 439 AW 366 FW Mountain Home AFB ID AND Westover ARB ACC/AFRC 22 22nd Air Refueling Wing 22 ARW McConnell AFB KS AMC 23 305th Air Mobility Wing 305 AMW McGuire AFB NJ AMC 24 375th Air Mobility Wing 355 FW Davis-Monthan AFB AZ ACC 25 432nd Wing 432 WG Creech AFB ACC 26 57th Wing 57 WG Nellis AFB NV ACC 27 1st Special Operations Wing 1 SOW Hurlburt Field FL AFSOC 28 96th Air Base Wing AND 434th ARW 96 ABW
  • 2019Community Involvement Report

    2019Community Involvement Report

    MIT LINCOLN LABORATORY COMMUNITY 2019 INVOLVEMENT REPORT Outreach Office MI T LINCOL N LABORATORY A Decade // of Achievement 2018 Lincoln LaboratoryTA Outreach T 6 April 2007– 6 April 20192017 NUMBERS Donated to the American Military Fellows at AScientistsNNUAL & R engineersEPORTS WHoursEBSITE per year supportingLAUNCHED IN CAPABILITIES TECHNICAL Heart Association Lincoln Laboratory volunteering STEM BROCHURES EXCELLENCE AWARDS 300 11 12,15 20080 5,21117 55 10 Care packages Dollars given to the Jimmy Fund Dollars raised for Alzheimer Dollars raised by Laboratory ACTS OOKS EPORTS DAUGHTERS & SONS DAYS DIRECTOR’S OFFICE Fsent to troops B byMIT Laboratory R cyclists Support Community since 2009 employees in 2019 since 2015 MEMOS PROOFREAD 1607 110,792 20+ 549,283 10 1,20620,175$0 Students seeing Students touring Charities receiving Lincoln Laboratory OUTREACH PLAQUES & STUDENTS IN SSTEMTUDENTS demonstrations IN OUR STEM PROGRAMS Lincoln Laboratory donations K-12 STEM programs REWARDS PROGRAMS FAIRS CREATED NOW IN STEM COORDINATED MAJORS 14,00080,000+ 2560+ Money donated to Summer Internships Staff in Lincoln PEN LINCOLN ToysMI Tfor OTots drive STEM PROGRAMS Scholars LABORATORY 37 HOUSE 120 JOURNALS 940 2 274 50 1,0007 200 9 JAC BOOKLETS LLRISE CYBERPATRIOT Contents A MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR 02 - 03 04 - 37 01 ∕ EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH 06 K–12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Outreach 23 Partnerships with MIT 28 Community Engagement 38 - 59 02 ∕ EDUCATIONAL COLLABORATIONS 40 University Student Programs 45 MIT Student Programs 52 Military Student Programs 58 Technical Staff Programs 60 - 85 03 ∕ COMMUNITY GIVING 62 Helping Those in Need 73 Helping Those Who Help Others 79 Supporting Local Communities A Message From the Director Lincoln Laboratory has built a strong program of educational outreach activities that encourage students to explore science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
  • The Legacy of Norbert Wiener: a Centennial Symposium

    The Legacy of Norbert Wiener: a Centennial Symposium

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/pspum/060 Selected Titles in This Series 60 David Jerison, I. M. Singer, and Daniel W. Stroock, Editors, The legacy of Norbert Wiener: A centennial symposium (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, October 1994) 59 William Arveson, Thomas Branson, and Irving Segal, Editors, Quantization, nonlinear partial differential equations, and operator algebra (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, June 1994) 58 Bill Jacob and Alex Rosenberg, Editors, K-theory and algebraic geometry: Connections with quadratic forms and division algebras (University of California, Santa Barbara, July 1992) 57 Michael C. Cranston and Mark A. Pinsky, Editors, Stochastic analysis (Cornell University, Ithaca, July 1993) 56 William J. Haboush and Brian J. Parshall, Editors, Algebraic groups and their generalizations (Pennsylvania State University, University Park, July 1991) 55 Uwe Jannsen, Steven L. Kleiman, and Jean-Pierre Serre, Editors, Motives (University of Washington, Seattle, July/August 1991) 54 Robert Greene and S. T. Yau, Editors, Differential geometry (University of California, Los Angeles, July 1990) 53 James A. Carlson, C. Herbert Clemens, and David R. Morrison, Editors, Complex geometry and Lie theory (Sundance, Utah, May 1989) 52 Eric Bedford, John P. D'Angelo, Robert E. Greene, and Steven G. Krantz, Editors, Several complex variables and complex geometry (University of California, Santa Cruz, July 1989) 51 William B. Arveson and Ronald G. Douglas, Editors, Operator theory/operator algebras and applications (University of New Hampshire, July 1988) 50 James Glimm, John Impagliazzo, and Isadore Singer, Editors, The legacy of John von Neumann (Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, May/June 1988) 49 Robert C. Gunning and Leon Ehrenpreis, Editors, Theta functions - Bowdoin 1987 (Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine, July 1987) 48 R.