Project Vdcs and Cluster List of Project Vdcs by Districts and by Phase Wise Start of Project Interventions District No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Project Vdcs and Cluster List of Project Vdcs by Districts and by Phase Wise Start of Project Interventions District No Project VDCs and Cluster List of Project VDCs by districts and by Phase wise Start of Project Interventions District No. District Name Name of VDCs by starting year of interventions Cluster I Cluster II Cluster III (2 VDCs/district) (4 VDCs/ district) (4 VDCs/district) Far-Western Region 1 Doti Banlek Chamara Chautara Chhatiban Ghateswor Mude gauan Jijodamandu Kadamandu Pachnali Baglek Simchaur 2 Darchula Dattu Dhaulakot Dhari Hunainath Sunsera Latinath Dhusa Dhap Gulzar Dandakot 3 Bajhang Dangaji Dhamena Banjh Parakatne Kailasha Hemantbada Melbisauna Rayal Lamatola Majhigaun 4 Bajura Kailashmandu Brahmatola Atichaur Kuldevmandu Kolti Barhabis Martadi Jugada Pandusen Kotila 5 Achham Basti Jalpadevi Dhudhurkot Oligaun Siddheswori Bawala Budakot Jupu MangalSen Kuntibandali 6 Baitadi Nwali Haat Kotpatera Shreekedar Patan Deulek Gukuleswor Hatairaj Gwalek Kaipal 7 Dadeldhura Gankhet Bhadrapur Alital Sirsa Dewal Divyapur Asigram Belapur Bhageswor Nabadurga Chipur Mid-Western Development Region 8 Surkhet Salkot Kalyan Gutu Vidyapur Dashrathpur Babiyachaur Bajedichaur Gumi Rakam Lekpharsa 9 Jumla Raralihi Haku Guthichaur Malikathanta Malikabota Tatopani mahawaipatar Bumramadichaur khols District No. District Name Name of VDCs by starting year of interventions Cluster I Cluster II Cluster III (2 VDCs/district) (4 VDCs/ district) (4 VDCs/district) Dillichaur Garyangkot 10 Kalikot Chilkhya Lalu Jubitha Phoimahadev Mugurah (kalika) Ranchuli Phukot Bharta Sipkhana Mumra 11 Mugu Seri Pina Rara kalai Jima Rara (Jila) Khamale Shreenagar Rowa Ruga Mangri 12 Humla Kharpunath Dandaphaya Thehe Chipra Kalika Shreenagar Syada Lali Saya Gothi 13 Dailekh Kalbhairav Naule katuwal Belpata Gamaudi Khadkawada Dullu Bansi Badlamji Salleri Toli 14 Jajarkot Punma Salma Jhapra jagatipur Sima karki gaun Junge Dhime thapachaur Khalanga Dandagaun 15 Pyuthan Barjiwang Bijuwar Khaira Vijayanagar Dharmawati Okharkot Badikot Markawang Tiram Dakhaquadi 16 Rolpa Ghartigaun Budagaun Jangkot Gairigaun Gajul Korchawang Liwang Jugar Jaimakasla Bdachaur 17 Rukum Chhiwang Vijayaswori Simali Chakhawang Putimkanda Kotjahari Garayala Sankh Khalanga Bhalakcha 18 Salyan Manjhkanda Kaprechaur Chandekrenji Siddheswori Triveni Dhajaripipal Shivrath Kalche Korwang Dhakadam Jhimphe 19 Dolpa Juphal Kaigaun Laha District No. District Name Name of VDCs by starting year of interventions Cluster I Cluster II Cluster III (2 VDCs/district) (4 VDCs/ district) (4 VDCs/district) Likhu Dunai Tripurkot Majhphal Sunho Narku Phoksundo Total new VDC 38 76 76 Total VDCs with interventions 38 114 190 .
Recommended publications
  • Food Security Bulletin 29
    Nepal Food Security Bulletin Issue 29, October 2010 The focus of this edition is on the Mid and Far Western Hill and Mountain region Situation summary Figure 1. Percentage of population food insecure* 26% This Food Security Bulletin covers the period July-September and is focused on the Mid and Far Western Hill and Mountain (MFWHM) 24% region (typically the most food insecure region of the country). 22% July – August is an agricultural lean period in Nepal and typically a season of increased food insecurity. In addition, flooding and 20% landslides caused by monsoon regularly block transportation routes and result in localised crop losses. 18 % During the 2010 monsoon 1,600 families were reportedly 16 % displaced due to flooding, the Karnali Highway and other trade 14 % routes were blocked by landslides and significant crop losses were Oct -Dec Jan-M ar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct -Dec Jan-M ar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep reported in Kanchanpur, Dadeldhura, western Surkhet and south- 08 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 eastern Udayapur. NeKSAP District Food Security Networks in MFWHM districts Rural Nepal Mid-Far-Western Hills&Mountains identified 163 VDCs in 12 districts that are highly food insecure. Forty-four percent of the population in Humla and Bajura are reportedly facing a high level of food insecurity. Other districts with households that are facing a high level of food insecurity are Mugu, Kalikot, Rukum, Surkhet, Achham, Doti, Bajhang, Baitadi, Dadeldhura and Darchula. These households have both very limited food stocks and limited financial resources to purchase food. Most households are coping by reducing consumption, borrowing money or food and selling assets.
    [Show full text]
  • CONNECT Component Review
    CONNECT component review CONNECT component review Date: 4 May 2020 Authors: Gordon Freer and Edward Hedley Submitted by Itad Itad 4 May 2020 CONNECT component review Acknowledgements The review team acknowledges the support of the Connect programme team in providing documentation and helping the team to arrange interviews. The review team also expresses thanks to our field team in conducting interviews and collecting data in the field. Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are those of the evaluators. They do not represent those of Connect or of any of the individuals and other organisations referred to in the report. ‘Itad’ and the tri-colour triangles icon are a registered trademark of ITAD Limited. Itad 4 May 2020 i CONNECT component review Contents List of acronyms iii 1. Introduction and scope 1 1.1. CONNECT component background 1 1.2. Review purpose 1 1.3. Review methodology 1 1.4. Review limitations 2 1.5. Structure of the report 2 2. Theoretical framework Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.1. The M4P Theory of Change 3 2.2. The CONNECT Theory of Change 4 2.3. Intervention Theories of Change 5 2.4. Commentary on intervention design 6 3. Findings 8 3.1. Relevance 8 3.2. Effectiveness: were the interventions effective in promoting changes to practice? 11 3.3. Impact: did the changes have value for the beneficiaries? 13 3.4. Sustainability: Are the changes likely to be implemented in the future? 15 4. Conclusion 18 5. Lessons and recommendations 19 List of references 21 Table of respondents 22 Annex A: Case study – Belpata Dairy
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study of Kailash Sacred Landscape
    Kailash Sacred Landscape Conservation Initiative Feasability Assessment Report - Nepal Central Department of Botany Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal June 2010 Contributors, Advisors, Consultants Core group contributors • Chaudhary, Ram P., Professor, Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University; National Coordinator, KSLCI-Nepal • Shrestha, Krishna K., Head, Central Department of Botany • Jha, Pramod K., Professor, Central Department of Botany • Bhatta, Kuber P., Consultant, Kailash Sacred Landscape Project, Nepal Contributors • Acharya, M., Department of Forest, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (MFSC) • Bajracharya, B., International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) • Basnet, G., Independent Consultant, Environmental Anthropologist • Basnet, T., Tribhuvan University • Belbase, N., Legal expert • Bhatta, S., Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation • Bhusal, Y. R. Secretary, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Das, A. N., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Ghimire, S. K., Tribhuvan University • Joshi, S. P., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Khanal, S., Independent Contributor • Maharjan, R., Department of Forest • Paudel, K. C., Department of Plant Resources • Rajbhandari, K.R., Expert, Plant Biodiversity • Rimal, S., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Sah, R.N., Department of Forest • Sharma, K., Department of Hydrology • Shrestha, S. M., Department of Forest • Siwakoti, M., Tribhuvan University • Upadhyaya, M.P., National Agricultural Research Council
    [Show full text]
  • Bon Sanctuary Trek - 35 Days
    PO Box No.: 2721 Samakhusi-29, Kathmandu, Nepal Contact No.: +977-9851133894 Email: [email protected] www.himalayancompanion.com Bon Sanctuary Trek - 35 Days Dolpo is land of Bon, it is locating on the remote and rugged corner of West-Nepal has retained ancient bon culture and tradition still preserved. Dolpo Bon Sanctuary Trek is one of the great experience trek for those who are very keen to know about the Bon religion, how it has intimate connection with Bayul hidden sangrila Dolpo. During this trek you will have an opportunity to visit some very old and some recent Bon monasteries. The entire trip include ten big monasteries which is core focus of this journey and in addition many other old buddhist monasteries with amazing and breath taking hidden landscape, Khas culture, Bhotiya(Dolpopa) culture and wild animals. The major Bon Gonpas that we explore and visit in this trek are; Samling monastery in Vijer, Yungdrung Shugtsal in Barlie, Phuntsokling in Dho Tarap, Yangon Thongroling in Chharka, Thasung Tsoling in Rigmo, Thekchen Rabdiling in Pugmo, Tsallung Sidgyalgon in Karelikanda, Monri Zursum in Khaliban, Yungdrung Dodulling in Kaigaon and Dolpo Yungdrung Bon Tsokling in Dunai. Bon Santuary trek, starts from Juphal and all the way to Dunai, Tichurong, Barbung & Chharka to Dho Tarap then to Saldng to Bhijer, and to Shey Gompa, Phoksundo, Pugmo, Kag valley (Kaaigaon & Hurikot) and ends to Juphal. PO Box No.: 2721 Samakhusi-29, Kathmandu, Nepal Contact No.: +977-9851133894 Email: [email protected] www.himalayancompanion.com PRICE INCLUDES Airport pickup and drop. 3 Nights Hotel Accommodations in Kathmandu.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Most Traded Medicinal Plants from the Dolpa District of Nepal
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Toyama Repository STUDIES ON THE MOST TRADED MEDICINAL PLANTS FROM THE DOLPA DISTRICT OF NEPAL Mohan B. Gewali Division of Visiting Professors Institute of Natural Medicine University of Toyama Abstract The traditional uses, major chemical constituents and prominent biological activities of the most traded medicinal plants from Dolpa district of Nepal are described in this article. Cradled on the laps of the central Himalayan range, Nepal (147,181 Km2) is sandwiched between two Asian giants, India on the South and China on the North. Nepal is divided into 14 zones and 75 districts. The Karnali zone, which has a border with Tibet region of China, is made up of five districts. Dolpa district (7,889 km²) is one of them. Dolpa district’s topography starts from the subtropical region (1575 meter) and ends in the nival region (6883 meter) in the trans-Himalayan region. The district has a population of about 29545 with Hindu 60%, Buddhist 40% including 5.5% ancient Bonpo Religion. Major ethnic groups/castes belonging to both Hindu and Buddhist religions include Kshetri, Dangi, Rokaya, Shahi, Buda, Thakuri, Thakulla, Brahmins, Karki, Shrestha, Sherpa and other people of Tibetan origin. The languages spoken are Nepali, Dolpo and Kaike. Dolpo is a variant of the Tibetan language. Kaike is considered indigenous language of Tichurong valley. In the Dolpa district, the traditional Tibetan medical practices are common. The traditional Tibetan practitioners called the Amchis provide the health care service. The Amchis have profound knowledge about the medicinal herbs and the associated healing properties of the medicinal plants found in the Dolpa district.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Climate Change Support Programme
    Final Evaluation Report Laxmi Dutt Bhatta and Dr Shalu Adhikari LAXMI DUTT BHATTA SHALU ADHIKARI, PHD Commissioned by United Nations Development Programme, Nepal Submitted to United Nations Development Programme, Nepal Nepal Climate Change Support Programme Final Evaluation Report 2019 December, 2019 Acknowledgments The evaluation team appreciate and acknowledge the support received from many individuals and institutions for their contribution through time, innovative ideas, information, suggestions and assistance. We are very grateful to Ministry of Forests and Environment (MoFE) /Government of Nepal and DFID Nepal. We appreciate all support received from Dr Bishwa Nath Oli, Dr Sindhu Dhungana, Dr Maheswar Dhakal, Dr Arun P. Bhatta from the Ministry of Forests and Environment and Dr Ram Prasad Lamsal from the Department of Forests and Soil Conservation. We are very grateful to the UNDP Nepal for their support, time and openness during the evaluation process. We sincerely thank Mr Vijaya Singh, Mr Vijay Prasad Kesari, and Mr Dinesh Bista, from UNDP Nepal. Our sincere appreciation to the members of Nepal Climate Change Support Programme (NCCSP), including Mr Anil KC, Mr Manoj Ojha, Ms Rojy Joshi, Ms Shazia Thapa and Mr Hari Narayan Kurmi for their timely support making all documents available, and also logistics for field visits. NCCSP field staff from Dolpa, Mr Shankar Tamata, Bajura, Ms Srijana Regmi and Dang, Ms Deepa Bista for their support and openness during discussions are highly appreciated. Mr Simon Lucas from DFID also deserves our appreciation for his critical feedback during the process. We sincerely appreciate and thank Mayors, deputy Mayors and ward Chairpersons of different Palikas.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Five High Passes
    Five High Passes - Dolpo to Mustang Trek, Nepal An epic Himalayan trek crossing a region little changed by time; towering peaks, ancient villages and five of Nepal's finest 5,000m passes. Group departures See overleaf for departure dates Holiday overview Style Trek Accommodation Hotels, Camping Grade Strenuous Duration 23 days from London to London Trekking / Walking days On trek: 16 days Min/Max group size 5 / 12. Guaranteed to run for 5 Mountain Kingdoms Leader 2021 – John Turner Trip Leader Mountain Kingdoms Leader 2022 - TBC Land only Joining in Kathmandu, Nepal Max altitude 5,700m/18,700ft, Ghami La, Day 17 Private Departures & Tailor Made itineraries available tel: +44 (0)1453 844400 fax: +44 (0)1453 844422 [email protected] www.mountainkingdoms.com Mountain Kingdoms Ltd, 20 Long Street, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire GL12 7BT UK Managing Director: Steven Berry. Registered in England No. 2118433. VAT No. 496 6511 08 Last updated: 25 May 2021 Departures 2021 Dates: Sat 18 Sep – Sun 10 Oct 2022 Dates: Sat 30 Apr – Sun 22 May Sat 17 Sep – Sun 09 Oct 2023 Dates: Sat 29 Apr – Sun 21 May Sat 16 Sep – Sun 08 Oct Will the trip run? This trip is guaranteed to run for 5 people and for a maximum of 12. In the rare event that we cancel a holiday, we will refund you in full and give you at least 6 weeks warning. Many trips do fill up quickly – we advise you to book early if you want to secure a place(s) on the dates of your choice.
    [Show full text]
  • RAMS) + Performance-Based Contracting (PBC)
    Road Asset Management Systems (RAMS) + Performance-Based Contracting (PBC) Session 1.1: RAMS Introduction Serge Cartier van Dissel February 2021 Agenda Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Road Asset Management System Road Asset Management System Performance Based Contracting (RAMS) (RAMS) (PBC) Session 1.1 Session 2.1 Session 3.1 RAMS RAMS Data Management PBC Introduction & Introduction & Data Analysis Performance Standards Break Break Break Session 1.2 Session 2.2 Session 3.2 RAMS RAMS PBC Inspections & Data Collection Integration Payments Road Asset Management System Any system that is used to collect, manage and analyse road data for road planning and programming purposes Function of a RAMS: Optimizing the level and the allocation of road funding in relation to medium- and long-term results regarding road conditions and road user costs • Define the road network maintenance, rehabilitation and upgrading needs • Based on condition data • Determine the required budget to address those needs • Determine how the available budget is best allocated • To different roads and networks (class, traffic, etc.) • To different treatment types (routine, periodic, rehabilitation, upgrading) • Based on agreed prioritization criteria • Economic (e.g. road user costs, traffic levels) • Social (e.g. population, minimum access) • Predict the impact of that budget allocation • Future road network conditions • Future maintenance and rehabilitation costs • Monitor the road network over time Road Asset Management System • Data collection • Road data (inventory, condition, traffic,
    [Show full text]
  • Jhimruk Khola Watershed Health Report
    What is a watershed? A watershed is an area of land that contains a common set of streams and rivers that drain into a single larger body of water, such as a river (Figure 1). But watersheds include more than streams and rivers; they also consist of all the people, forests, wildlife, villages, infrastructure, terrain, climate, and agriculture within the landscape. It is important to think about a watershed in its entirety – upstream and downstream – instead of only looking at one element of the watershed. This is because water flows and connects various aspects of a watershed. What happens upstream has an impact on what happens downstream. For example, gravel mining upstream can increase sedimentation for downstream residents. Similarly, water diversions upstream for irrigation can reduce the amount of water available downstream for people and aquatic species. Figure 1: Diagram of a typical watershed The goal of this watershed health assessment is to help people living in the Jhimruk watershed make better decisions, protect and restore the watershed, reduce risks, and create sustainable economic opportunities. This watershed report uses indicators to measure different aspects of a watershed to determine if the landscape is healthy and able to provide ecosystem services to people living in that watershed. The indicators in this report were determined through a combination of local stakeholder use priorities and watershed health as defined in the literature. The health indicators in this report are grouped under larger categories of 1) nature, 2) wealth, and 3) power, each of which explores related aspects of the watershed from that particular viewpoint.
    [Show full text]
  • TSLC PMT Result
    Page 62 of 132 Rank Token No SLC/SEE Reg No Name District Palika WardNo Father Mother Village PMTScore Gender TSLC 1 42060 7574O15075 SOBHA BOHARA BOHARA Darchula Rithachaupata 3 HARI SINGH BOHARA BIMA BOHARA AMKUR 890.1 Female 2 39231 7569013048 Sanju Singh Bajura Gotree 9 Gyanendra Singh Jansara Singh Manikanda 902.7 Male 3 40574 7559004049 LOGAJAN BHANDARI Humla ShreeNagar 1 Hari Bhandari Amani Bhandari Bhandari gau 907 Male 4 40374 6560016016 DHANRAJ TAMATA Mugu Dhainakot 8 Bali Tamata Puni kala Tamata Dalitbada 908.2 Male 5 36515 7569004014 BHUVAN BAHADUR BK Bajura Martadi 3 Karna bahadur bk Dhauli lawar Chaurata 908.5 Male 6 43877 6960005019 NANDA SINGH B K Mugu Kotdanda 9 Jaya bahadur tiruwa Muga tiruwa Luee kotdanda mugu 910.4 Male 7 40945 7535076072 Saroj raut kurmi Rautahat GarudaBairiya 7 biswanath raut pramila devi pipariya dostiya 911.3 Male 8 42712 7569023079 NISHA BUDHa Bajura Sappata 6 GAN BAHADUR BUDHA AABHARI BUDHA CHUDARI 911.4 Female 9 35970 7260012119 RAMU TAMATATA Mugu Seri 5 Padam Bahadur Tamata Manamata Tamata Bamkanda 912.6 Female 10 36673 7375025003 Akbar Od Baitadi Pancheswor 3 Ganesh ram od Kalawati od Kalauti 915.4 Male 11 40529 7335011133 PRAMOD KUMAR PANDIT Rautahat Dharhari 5 MISHRI PANDIT URMILA DEVI 915.8 Male 12 42683 7525055002 BIMALA RAI Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Man Bahadur Rai Gauri Maya Rai Ghodghad 915.9 Female 13 42758 7525055016 SABIN AALE MAGAR Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Raj Kumar Aale Magqar Devi Aale Magar Ghodghad 915.9 Male 14 42459 7217094014 SOBHA DHAKAL Dolakha GhangSukathokar 2 Bishnu Prasad Dhakal
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation and Potential Habitat of the Himalayan Musk Deer, Moschus Chrysogaster, in the Protected Areas of Nepal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION SCIENCE ISSN: 2067-533X Volume 2, Issue 2, April-June: 127-141 www.ijcs.uaic.ro THE CONSERVATION AND POTENTIAL HABITAT OF THE HIMALAYAN MUSK DEER, MOSCHUS CHRYSOGASTER, IN THE PROTECTED AREAS OF NEPAL Achyut ARYAL 1*, Ashok SUBEDI 2 1) Ecology and Conservation Group, Institute of Natural Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand 2) Institute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Pokhara, Nepal Abstract The Himalayan musk deer (Moschus chrysogaster) is a cervid distributed from the eastern to the western Himalayas of Nepal. The species is listed as endangered in appendix I of IUCN Red data, and protected in Nepal under the National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act of 1973. Musk deer occupy the middle to the higher mountain regions, which cover 12 protected areas of Nepal (6 national parks, 5 conservation areas, 1 hunting reserve). However, of the 30177.19 km2 potential habitat, only 19.26% (5815.08 km2) is inside the protected areas and the remaining 80.73% falls outside the protected areas. Consequently, poaching, habitat destruction, livestock grazing and forest fire in the musk deer habitat are important challenges for the conservation of musk deer in the country. A thorough status survey in and outside the protected areas should be carried out and a species-focused conservation action plan should be prepared and implemented properly. A program for increasing awareness and enhancing livelihood of the local populations should be launched in the poor and poaching risk zones of Nepal. Keywords: Musk deer; potential habitat; poaching; protected area. Introduction The Himalayan musk deer (Moschus Chrysogaster) (Nepali name: Kasturi Mriga) is a cervid distributed from the eastern to the western Himalayas of Nepal.
    [Show full text]