DOCSLIB.ORG

Sabril Prescribing Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sabril Prescribing Information HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION • Dose patients weighing more than 60 kg according to adult recommendations These highlights do not include all the information needed to use SABRIL (2.2) safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for SABRIL. Infantile Spasms • Initiate at a daily dose of 50 mg/kg (25 mg/kg twice daily); increase total SABRIL® (vigabatrin) tablets, for oral use daily dose every 3 days, in increments of 25 mg/kg/day to 50 mg/kg/day, up SABRIL® (vigabatrin) powder for oral solution to a maximum daily dose of 150 mg/kg (75 mg/kg twice daily) (2.3) Initial U.S. Approval: 2009 Renal Impairment: Dose adjustment recommended (2.4, 8.5, 8.6) WARNING: PERMANENT VISION LOSS -------------------DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS------------------- See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. • Tablet: 500 mg (3) • SABRIL can cause permanent bilateral concentric visual field • Powder for Oral Solution: 500 mg (3) constriction, including tunnel vision that can result in disability. In some ----------------------------CONTRAINDICATIONS---------------------------- cases, SABRIL may also decrease visual acuity (5.1). None (4) • Risk increases with increasing dose and cumulative exposure, but there is no dose or exposure to SABRIL known to be free of risk of vision loss ----------------------WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS--------------------- (5.1). • Abnormal MRI signal changes and intramyelinic edema have been reported • Risk of new and worsening vision loss continues as long as SABRIL is in some infants with Infantile Spasms receiving SABRIL (5.3, 5.4) used, and possibly after discontinuing SABRIL (5.1). • Suicidal behavior and ideation: Antiepileptic drugs, including SABRIL, • Baseline and periodic vision assessment is recommended for patients on increase the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior (5.5) SABRIL. However, this assessment cannot always prevent vision • Withdrawal of AEDs: Taper dose to avoid withdrawal seizures (5.6) damage (5.1). • Anemia: Monitor for symptoms of anemia (5.7) • SABRIL is available only through a restricted program called the • Somnolence and fatigue: Advise patients not to drive or operate machinery Vigabatrin REMS Program (5.2). until they have gained sufficient experience on SABRIL (5.8) --------------------------RECENT MAJOR CHANGES-------------------------- -----------------------------ADVERSE REACTIONS----------------------------- Indications and Usage (1.1) 1/2020 Refractory Complex Partial Seizures Dosage and Administration (2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5) 1/2020 Most common adverse reactions in controlled studies include (incidence ≥5% Warnings and Precautions (5.3) 1/2020 over placebo): Warnings and Precautions (5.4) 7/2019 • Adults: blurred vision, somnolence, dizziness, abnormal coordination, tremor, and fatigue (6.1) ---------------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE--------------------------- • Pediatric patients (3 to 16 years of age): weight gain (6.1) SABRIL is indicated for the treatment of: Infantile Spasms (incidence >5% and greater than on placebo) • Refractory Complex Partial Seizures as adjunctive therapy in patients 2 years • Somnolence, bronchitis, ear infection, and acute otitis media (6.1) of age and older who have responded inadequately to several alternative treatments; SABRIL is not indicated as a first line agent (1.1) To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Lundbeck at • Infantile Spasms - monotherapy in infants 1 month to 2 years of age for 1-800-455-1141 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch. whom the potential benefits outweigh the potential risk of vision loss (1.2) ------------------------------DRUG INTERACTIONS----------------------------- ---------------------DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION---------------------- Decreased phenytoin plasma levels: dosage adjustment may be needed (7.1) Refractory Complex Partial Seizures • Adults (17 years of age and older): Initiate at 1000 mg/day (500 mg twice ----------------------USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS----------------------- daily); increase total daily dose weekly in 500 mg/day increments, to the • Pregnancy: Based on animal data, may cause fetal harm (8.1) recommended dose of 3000 mg/day (1500 mg twice daily) (2.2) • Lactation: SABRIL is excreted in human milk (8.2) • Pediatric (2 to 16 years of age): The recommended dosage is based on body weight and administered as two divided doses (2.2) See 17 for PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION and Medication • The dosage may be increased in weekly intervals, depending on response Guide. (2.2) Revised: 1/2020 FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION: CONTENTS* 7.1 Antiepileptic Drugs 7.2 Oral Contraceptives WARNING: PERMANENT VISION LOSS 7.3 Drug-Laboratory Test Interactions 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE 8 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS 1.1 Refractory Complex Partial Seizures (CPS) 8.1 Pregnancy 1.2 Infantile Spasms (IS) 8.2 Lactation 2 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION 8.4 Pediatric Use 2.1 Important Dosing and Administration Instructions 8.5 Geriatric Use 2.2 Refractory Complex Partial Seizures 8.6 Renal Impairment 2.3 Infantile Spasms 9 DRUG ABUSE AND DEPENDENCE 2.4 Patients with Renal Impairment 9.1 Controlled Substance 2.5 Preparation and Administration Instructions for SABRIL Powder for 9.2 Abuse Oral Solution 9.3 Dependence 3 DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS 10 OVERDOSAGE 4 CONTRAINDICATIONS 10.1 Signs, Symptoms, and Laboratory Findings of Overdosage 5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS 10.2 Management of Overdosage 5.1 Permanent Vision Loss 11 DESCRIPTION 5.2 Vigabatrin REMS Program 12 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY 5.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Abnormalities in Infants 12.1 Mechanism of Action 5.4 Neurotoxicity 12.2 Pharmacodynamics 5.5 Suicidal Behavior and Ideation 12.3 Pharmacokinetics 5.6 Withdrawal of Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs) 13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY 5.7 Anemia 13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility 5.8 Somnolence and Fatigue 14 CLINICAL STUDIES 5.9 Peripheral Neuropathy 14.1 Complex Partial Seizures 5.10 Weight Gain 14.2 Infantile Spasms 5.11 Edema 16 HOW SUPPLIED/STORAGE AND HANDLING 6 ADVERSE REACTIONS 16.1 How Supplied 6.1 Clinical Trial Experience 16.2 Storage and Handling 6.2 Postmarketing Experience 17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION 7 DRUG INTERACTIONS * Sections or subsections omitted from the full prescribing information are not listed. Page 2 of 26 FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION WARNING: PERMANENT VISION LOSS • SABRIL can cause permanent bilateral concentric visual field constriction, including tunnel vision that can result in disability. In some cases, SABRIL also can damage the central retina and may decrease visual acuity [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)]. • The onset of vision loss from SABRIL is unpredictable, and can occur within weeks of starting treatment or sooner, or at any time after starting treatment, even after months or years. • Symptoms of vision loss from SABRIL are unlikely to be recognized by patients or caregivers before vision loss is severe. Vision loss of milder severity, while often unrecognized by the patient or caregiver, can still adversely affect function. • The risk of vision loss increases with increasing dose and cumulative exposure, but there is no dose or exposure known to be free of risk of vision loss. • Vision assessment is recommended at baseline (no later than 4 weeks after starting SABRIL), at least every 3 months during therapy, and about 3 to 6 months after the discontinuation of therapy. • Once detected, vision loss due to SABRIL is not reversible. It is expected that, even with frequent monitoring, some patients will develop severe vision loss. • Consider drug discontinuation, balancing benefit and risk, if vision loss is documented. • Risk of new or worsening vision loss continues as long as SABRIL is used. It is possible that vision loss can worsen despite discontinuation of SABRIL. • Because of the risk of vision loss, SABRIL should be withdrawn from patients with refractory complex partial seizures who fail to show substantial clinical benefit within 3 months of initiation and within 2-4 weeks of initiation for patients with infantile spasms, or sooner if treatment failure becomes obvious. Patient response to and continued need for SABRIL should be periodically reassessed. • SABRIL should not be used in patients with, or at high risk of, other types of irreversible vision loss unless the benefits of treatment clearly outweigh the risks. • SABRIL should not be used with other drugs associated with serious adverse ophthalmic effects such as retinopathy or glaucoma unless the benefits clearly outweigh the risks. • Use the lowest dosage and shortest exposure to SABRIL consistent with clinical objectives [see Dosage and Administration (2.1)]. Because of the risk of permanent vision loss, SABRIL is available only through a restricted program under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) called the Vigabatrin REMS Program [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)]. Further information is available at www.vigabatrinREMS.com or 1-866-244-8175. 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE 1.1 Refractory Complex Partial Seizures (CPS) SABRIL is indicated as adjunctive therapy for adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older with refractory complex partial seizures who have inadequately responded to several alternative treatments and for whom the potential benefits outweigh the risk of vision loss [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)]. SABRIL is not indicated as a first line agent for complex partial seizures. 1.2 Infantile Spasms (IS) SABRIL is indicated as monotherapy for pediatric patients with infantile spasms 1 month to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eslicarbazepine Acetate Longer Procedure No
    European Medicines Agency London, 19 February 2009 Doc. Ref.: EMEA/135697/2009 CHMP ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR authorised Exalief International Nonproprietary Name: eslicarbazepine acetate longer Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/000987 no Assessment Report as adopted by the CHMP with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. product Medicinal 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HB, UK Tel. (44-20) 74 18 84 00 Fax (44-20) 74 18 84 16 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.emea.europa.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PROCEDURE........................................... 3 1.1. Submission of the dossier ...................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Steps taken for the assessment of the product..................................................................... 3 2. SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION................................................................................................. 4 2.1. Introduction............................................................................................................................ 4 2.2. Quality aspects ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.3. Non-clinical aspects................................................................................................................ 8 2.4. Clinical aspects....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Action of Antiepileptic Drugs
    Review Mechanisms of action of antiepileptic drugs Epilepsy affects up to 1% of the general population and causes substantial disability. The management of seizures in patients with epilepsy relies heavily on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid have been the primary medications used to treat epilepsy for several decades. Since 1993 several AEDs have been approved by the US FDA for use in epilepsy. The choice of the AED is based primarily on the seizure type, spectrum of clinical activity, side effect profile and patient characteristics such as age, comorbidities and concurrent medical treatments. Those AEDs with broad- spectrum activity are often found to exert an action at more than one molecular target. This article will review the proposed mechanisms of action of marketed AEDs in the US and discuss the future of AEDs in development. 1 KEYWORDS: AEDs anticonvulsant drugs antiepileptic drugs epilepsy Aaron M Cook mechanism of action seizures & Meriem K Bensalem-Owen† The therapeutic armamentarium for the treat- patients with refractory seizures. The aim of this 1UK HealthCare, 800 Rose St. H-109, ment of seizures has broadened significantly article is to discuss the past, present and future of Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA †Author for correspondence: over the past decade [1]. Many of the newer AED pharmacology and mechanisms of action. College of Medicine, Department of anti epileptic drugs (AEDs) have clinical advan- Neurology, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Room L-455, tages over older, so-called ‘first-generation’ First-generation AEDs Lexington, KY 40536, USA AEDs in that they are more predictable in their Broadly, the mechanisms of action of AEDs can Tel.: +1 859 323 0229 Fax: +1 859 323 5943 dose–response profile and typically are associ- be categorized by their effects on the neuronal [email protected] ated with less drug–drug interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 25 Mechanisms of Action of Antiepileptic Drugs
    Chapter 25 Mechanisms of action of antiepileptic drugs GRAEME J. SILLS Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool _________________________________________________________________________ Introduction The serendipitous discovery of the anticonvulsant properties of phenobarbital in 1912 marked the foundation of the modern pharmacotherapy of epilepsy. The subsequent 70 years saw the introduction of phenytoin, ethosuximide, carbamazepine, sodium valproate and a range of benzodiazepines. Collectively, these compounds have come to be regarded as the ‘established’ antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A concerted period of development of drugs for epilepsy throughout the 1980s and 1990s has resulted (to date) in 16 new agents being licensed as add-on treatment for difficult-to-control adult and/or paediatric epilepsy, with some becoming available as monotherapy for newly diagnosed patients. Together, these have become known as the ‘modern’ AEDs. Throughout this period of unprecedented drug development, there have also been considerable advances in our understanding of how antiepileptic agents exert their effects at the cellular level. AEDs are neither preventive nor curative and are employed solely as a means of controlling symptoms (i.e. suppression of seizures). Recurrent seizure activity is the manifestation of an intermittent and excessive hyperexcitability of the nervous system and, while the pharmacological minutiae of currently marketed AEDs remain to be completely unravelled, these agents essentially redress the balance between neuronal excitation and inhibition. Three major classes of mechanism are recognised: modulation of voltage-gated ion channels; enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission; and attenuation of glutamate-mediated excitatory neurotransmission. The principal pharmacological targets of currently available AEDs are highlighted in Table 1 and discussed further below.
    [Show full text]
  • Anticonvulsants
    Clinical Pharmacy Program Guidelines for Anticonvulsants Program Prior Authorization - Anticonvulsants Medication Aptiom (eslicarbazepine), Briviact (brivaracetam), Fycompa (perampanel), Vimpat (lacosamide), Gabitril (tiagabine), Banzel (rufinamide), Onfi (clobazam), Epidiolex (cannabidiol), Sympazan (clobazam), Sabril, (vigabatrin), Diacomit (stiripentol), Xcopri (cenobamate), Fintepla (fenfluramine) Markets in Scope Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, New York EPP, Pennsylvania- CHIP, Rhode Island, South Carolina Issue Date 6/2016 Pharmacy and 10/2020 Therapeutics Approval Date Effective Date 12/2020 1. Background: Aptiom (eslicarbazepine acetate), Briviact (brivaracetam), Vimpat (lacosamide) and Xcopri are indicated in the treatment of partial-onset seizures. Banzel (rufinamide), Onfi (clobazam), and Sympazan (clobazam) are indicated for the adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). There is some clinical evidence to support the use of clobazam for refractory partial onset seizures. Diacomit (stiripentol) is indicated for seizures associated with Dravet syndrome in patients taking clobazam. Epidiolex (cannabadiol) is indicated for seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome or tuberous sclerosis complex. Fintepla (fenfluramine) is indicated for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome. Fycompa (perampanel) is indicated for the treatment of partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures and as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Gabitril (tiagabine) is indicated ad adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial-onset seizures. Confidential and Proprietary, © 2020 UnitedHealthcare Services Inc. Sabril (vigabatrin) is indicated as adjunctive therapy for refractory complex partial seizures in patients who have inadequately responded to several alternative treatments and for infantile spasms for whom the potential benefits outweigh the risk of vision loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 22-006 PHARMACOLOGY REVIEW(S) Tertiary Pharmacology Review By: Paul C. Brown, Ph.D., ODE Associate Director for Pharmacology and Toxicology OND IO NDA: 20-427 and 22-006 Submission date: December 28, 2007 (Complete response) Drug: vigabatrin Sponsor: Ovation Pharmaceuticals Indication: 20-427: refractory complex partial seizures in adults 22-006: infantile spasms Reviewing Division: Division of Neurology Products Introductory Comments: The regulatory history of these two NDAs is summarized in the supervisory pharm/tox review. The pharm/tox review of NDA 20-427 found the nonclinical information adequate to support approval. The pharm/tox reviewer for NDA 22-006 did not find the nonclinical information adequate to support approval primarily based on evidence that juvenile animals were sensitive to neurotoxic effects of vigabatrin. The pharm/tox supervisor recognized this concern but did not object to the approval of NDA 22-006 based on the clinical benefit of vigabatrin in infantile spasms which is a serious indication with no other approved therapy. The supervisor recommended that additional studies on the retinal damage and neurotoxicity induced by vigabatrin be conducted as postmarketing requirements. This includes the following studies: 1. A toxicology study in the juvenile rat examining the potential of vigabatrin exposure during development to produce neuronal damage. 2. A juvenile animal toxicology study of vigabatrin in a non-rodent species. 3. A study examining the effect of taurine on vigabatrin-induced retinal damage in rodent. Conclusions: I have discussed these NDAs with the division pharm/tox supervisor and agree that they may be approved from a pharm/tox perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Care Guideline for Tiagabine (Gabitril®) for Use As Add on Therapy for Partial Seizures in Adults and Children Over 12
    Dorset Medicines Advisory Group SHARED CARE GUIDELINE FOR TIAGABINE (GABITRIL®) FOR USE AS ADD ON THERAPY FOR PARTIAL SEIZURES IN ADULTS AND CHILDREN OVER 12 INDICATION Licensed indications & therapeutic class Tiagabine is an anti-epileptic drug indicated as add-on therapy for partial seizures with or without secondary generalisation where control is not achieved by optimal doses of at least one other anti- epileptic drug. Tiagabine is licensed only for use in adults and children over the age of 12. It is not licensed for monotherapy. NICE CG137: Epilepsies: diagnosis and management (page 26) states: Offer carbamazepine, clobazam, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, sodium valproate or topiramate as adjunctive treatment to children, young people and adults with focal seizures if first-line treatments [carbamazepine or lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine or sodium valoprate] are ineffective or not tolerated. If adjunctive treatment is ineffective or not tolerated, discuss with, or refer to, a tertiary epilepsy specialist. Other AEDs that may be considered by the tertiary epilepsy specialist are eslicarbazepine acetate, lacosamide, phenobarbital, phenytoin, pregabalin, tiagabine, vigabatrin and zonisamide. Carefully consider the risk–benefit ratio when using vigabatrin because of the risk of an irreversible effect on visual fields. NICE also has a “Do not do” recommendation in relation to tiagabine: “Do not offer carbamazepine, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, pregabalin, tiagabine or vigabatrin as adjunctive treatment in children, young people and adults with childhood absence epilepsy, juvenile absence epilepsy or other absence epilepsy syndromes.” AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR SHARED CARE Patients should be at the centre of any shared care arrangements. Individual patient information and a record of their preferences should accompany shared care prescribing guidelines, where appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Report Treatment of Infantile Spasms with Sodium Valproate Followed by Benzodiazepines
    Preliminary Report Treatment of Infantile Spasms with Sodium Valproate followed by Benzodiazepines Narong Auvichayapat MD*, Sompon Tassniyom MD*, Sutthinee Treerotphon MD*, Paradee Auvichayapat MD** * Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen ** Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen Objective: To review the result of the infantile spasms’ treatment with sodium valproate followed by nitrazepam or clonazepam. Study design: Descriptive retrospective study. Setting: Srinagarind Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. Material and Method: Twenty-four infantile spasms admitted between January 1994 and December 2003 were analyzed. The inclusion criteria were the patients with infantile spasms clinically diagnosed by the pediatric neurologist, having hypsarrhythmic pattern EEG, and receiving sodium valproate with or without nitrazepam or clonazepam. The patients who had an uncertain diagnosis, incomplete medical record, or that were incompletely followed up were excluded. Data were collected on sex, age at onset of seizure, type of infantile spasms, associated type of seizure, predisposing etiological factor, neuroimaging study, and the result of treatment including cessation of spasms, subsequent development of other seizure types, quantitative reduction of spasms, relapse rates of spasms, psychomotor development, and adverse effects of AEDs. Results: The mean age at onset was 177 days. The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.2. There were 13 cryptogenic (54.2%) and 11 symptomatic (45.8%) infantile spasms. The most common predisposing etiological factors in symptomatic cases were hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (45.5%) and microcephaly (36.4%), respectively. Ten patients received sodium valproate (41.7%), another 10 received sodium valproate with clonazepam (41.7%), and four received sodium valproate with nitrazepam (16.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • Vigabatrin Associated Visual Field Loss: a Clinical Audit to Study
    Eye (2002) 16, 567–571 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-222X/02 $25.00 www.nature.com/eye WD Newman, K Tocher and JF Acheson Vigabatrin associated CLINICAL STUDY visual field loss: a clinical audit to study prevalence, drug history and effects of drug withdrawal Abstract convulsants. We found no evidence of progression or resolution of visual field Purpose To survey clinical visual function defects on discontinuing the drug, and no including quantitative manual perimetry relationship between dose history and visual results in a group of patients taking deficit field loss. An idiosyncratic drug vigabatrin; to assess the severity of any field reaction within the neurosensory retina may defects; to tabulate cumulative and daily underlie the pathogenesis of the visual field doses of medication and to assess possible loss in some patients changes in visual function over time. Eye (2002) 16, 567–571. doi:10.1038/ Method A prevalence study of 100 out of sj.eye.6700168 183 patients currently attending a tertiary referral epilepsy centre who were taking or had recently discontinued vigabatrin Keywords: vigabatrin; visual failure; visual (duration 83–3570 days; mean 1885 days) as fields part of combination anticonvulsant therapy. Complete neuro-ophthalmic examination Introduction including Goldmann kinetic perimetry was performed and monocular mean radial Vigabatrin (Sabril, Hoechst Marion degrees (MRD) to the I/4e isopter calculated. Roussel/Aventis Ltd) was introduced into UK Patients were followed up at 6-monthly clinical practice on a trial basis in the mid- intervals for not less than 18 months. 1980s and granted a licence in 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • 20-427S011 Vigabatrin Clinical BPCA
    CLINICAL REVIEW Application Type NDA Efficacy Supplement Application Number(s) NDA 20427 S-011/S-012 (tablet) NDA 22006 S-012/S-013 (oral solution) Priority or Standard Priority Submit Date(s) April 26, 2013 Received Date(s) April 26, 2013 PDUFA Goal Date October 26, 2013 Division / Office DNP/ ODE 1 Reviewer Name(s) Philip H. Sheridan, M.D. Review Completion Date September 27, 2013 Established Name Vigabatrin (Proposed) Trade Name Sabril Therapeutic Class Anticonvulsant Applicant Lundbeck Inc. Formulation(s) Tablet Sachet for Oral Solution Dosing Regimen BID Indication(s) Complex Partial Seizures Infantile Spasms Intended Population(s) Adult and Pediatric Reference ID: 3396639 Template Version: March 6, 2009 APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL Reference ID: 3396639 Clinical Review Philip H. Sheridan, MD NDA 20427 S011/S-012; NDA 22006 S-012/S-013 Sabril (Vigabatrin) Table of Contents 1 RECOMMENDATIONS/RISK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ......................................... 9 1.1 Recommendation on Regulatory Action ............................................................. 9 1.2 Risk Benefit Assessment .................................................................................... 9 1.4 Recommendations for Postmarket Requirements and Commitments .............. 11 2 INTRODUCTION AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND ...................................... 12 2.1 Product Information .......................................................................................... 12 2.2 Tables of Currently Available Treatments for Proposed Indications ................
    [Show full text]
  • Antiepileptic Drugs for Epilepsy
    Antiepileptic Drugs for Epilepsy EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES After completing this activity, participants should be better able to: 1. Define the difference between a seizure and epilepsy. 2. Identify causes and risk factors associated with epilepsy. 3. Understand the proposed pathophysiology of seizures. 4. Describe the mechanism of action of AEDs used in the management of epilepsy. 5. Assess adverse effects and potential drug-drug interactions associated with the use of AEDs CE EXAM RATIONALE 1. Epilepsy is: A. The most common neurologic disorder worldwide B. A chronic condition in which patients experience recurrent, unprovoked seizures*** C. An isolated event resulting from abnormal electrical disturbances in the brain D. Not classified based on seizure type Correct answer: B Epilepsy is defined as a chronic condition in which patients experience recurrent, unprovoked seizures that range from short-lived intervals of inattention or muscle jerking to severe and elongated convulsions. It is the fourth most common neurologic disorder, affecting approximately 65 million people worldwide. The International Classification of Epileptic Seizures classifies seizures as partial (focal) or generalized. 2. Possible causes of epilepsy and seizures include: A. Stroke B. Head trauma C. Medications such as antidepressants and antipsychotics D. All of the above*** Correct answer: D The cause of epilepsy is idiopathic in origin in approximately half of all patients. However, several medical conditions have an associated risk or causation with epilepsy, including traumatic brain injury (TBI), CNS infections, hypoglycemia, eclampsia, fever, and stroke. In addition, many medications have been associated with precipitating seizures (Table 1). 3. Mechanisms of seizure control include all of the following except: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 26 Starting Antiepileptic Drug Treatment
    Chapter 26 Starting antiepileptic drug treatment KHALID HAMANDI Welsh Epilepsy Centre, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff _________________________________________________________________________ The single most important consideration before starting antiepileptic medication is to be secure of the diagnosis of epilepsy based on the clinical history and, where needed, supporting investigations. Antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment should never be started as a trial to ‘test’ the diagnosis; this will only cause problems for you and the patient, and is generally unhelpful in resolving diagnostic uncertainty. Given a likely clinical diagnosis the next questions are when to start treatment, followed by what choice of AED. AEDs should prescribed after a careful evaluation of the risks and benefits of treatment and a discussion with the individual patient about the merits and potential side effects of treatment1. The decision to start medication is a major one – treatment will be for many years, even lifelong, and future withdrawal will bring its own issues around recurrence risk and driving, for instance. The decision to start will depend upon factors such as the risk of recurrence, seizure type, the risk around implication of further seizures, desire to regain a driving licence and, for women, the risks of AEDs and seizures in pregnancy. Antiepileptic medication is normally taken for years, and good adherence is essential to avoid withdrawal seizures. Before starting any medication it is important to give information about side effects, drug interactions, teratogenicity and driving. It is helpful to have to hand one or two of the commonest possible side effects for each AED, to caution the patient about these for any new drug started and to document this clearly in notes and letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Protocol SEP093-701
    Titlpage Eslicarbazepine Acetate Clinical Study Protocol SEP093-701 Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as First Add-on to Levetiracetam or Lamotrigine Monotherapy or as Later Adjunctive Treatment for Subjects with Uncontrolled Partial-onset Seizures: A Multicenter, Open-label, Non-randomized Trial IND No. 67,466 Version 3.01 16 November 2017 Incorporating Non-substantial Amendment 1.00 SUNOVION PHARMACEUTICALS INC. 84 Waterford Drive Marlborough, MA 01752, USA (508) 481-6700 Protocol SEP093-701, Version 3.01 Eslicarbazepine acetate RESTRICTED DISTRIBUTION OF PROTOCOLS This protocol and the data gathered during the conduct of this protocol contains information that is confidential and/or of proprietary interest to Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co. Ltd. and/or Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. (including their predecessors, subsidiaries or affiliates). The information cannot be disclosed to any third party or used for any purpose other than the purpose for which it is being submitted without the prior written consent of the appropriate Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Company. This information is being provided to you for the purpose of conducting a study for Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. You may disclose the contents of this protocol to the study personnel under your supervision and to your Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee for the above purpose. You may not disclose the contents of this protocol to any other parties, unless such disclosure is required by government regulations or laws, without the prior written permission of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. Any supplemental information (eg, a protocol amendment) that may be added to this document is also proprietary to Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., and should be handled consistently with that stated above.
    [Show full text]