High-Redshift Blazars Through Nustar Eyes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High-Redshift Blazars Through Nustar Eyes Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2017 High-redshift lB azars through NuSTAR Eyes Lea Marcotulli Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Marcotulli, Lea, "High-redshift lB azars through NuSTAR Eyes" (2017). All Theses. 2653. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2653 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HIGH-REDSHIFT BLAZARS THROUGH NuSTAR EYES A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Astrophysics by Lea Marcotulli May 2017 Accepted by: Dr. Marco Ajello, Committee Chair Dr. Dieter Hartmann Dr. Bradley Meyer Abstract MeV blazars are the most powerful sources among the blazar class. With bolometric luminosities exceeding 1048 erg s−1 and powerful relativistic jets, they are usually detected at high-redshifts (z > 2) and they generally harbor extremely massive black holes (M 109M ). Being able to derive their physical BH ∼ ⊙ properties such as jet power, accretion disk luminosity, bulk Lorentz factor of the jet (Γ) and black hole mass, enables us to put constraints in the understanding of this not well sampled class of objects and use them for example to probe the formation of massive black holes in the early universe. In this thesis we have analyzed the broadband emission of three high redshift blazars, focusing on the high energy part of their spectral energy distribution. In fact, being able to obtain hard X-ray data from the recently launched NuSTAR and having γ-ray detections from the Fermi-LAT, we were able to constrain more accurately the high energy peak of their distribution and therefore more precisely infer their jet power, underlying electron distribution, Γ and viewing angle (θv). Gathering optical and UV data allowed us to determine the black hole mass of such powerful objects as well as their accretion disk luminosity. This work has recently been published in ApJ (Marcotulli et al., 2017). In Section 1, the broad family of active galactic nuclei (ANGs) and their main physical characteristics are introduced, with a focus on the subclass of blazars and specifically MeV blazars. In Section 2, the main instruments used in our research to gatherand analyze data are described, with a particular interest on imaging in the hard X-ray regime. Section 3 contains the data analysis description, the results obtained combining the observations with a one-zone leptonic emission model and the discussion on our findings. In Section 4 we report our conclusions and present an outlook on future MeV blazars studies possibilities. Appendix A, B and C contain an overlook of relativistic beaming, radiative processes and model used for these sources. ii Acknowledgments Being in Clemson has given me many satisfactions, and writing this thesis is one of them. But for this to be achieved, I needed the help of some fantastic people that deserve a proper thank you. First Marco, my advisor, the best! Without you I wouldn’t be here in the first place and I couldn’t have had this great experience that has been living in the US. It’s thanks to your advices and mentoring that I could do everything here and start my carreer. You made everything look easier and worth to. Plus, I mean, which advisor takes his students for camping? You’re just great. Grazie infinatamente! I also want to thank my unofficial advisor, Vaidehi. ‘Handsome, smart, with a little bit of belly but no worries’, not only you basically thaught me everything I know about blazars, but also about monkeys and you have been a good friend as well. And thanks to our group: Aman, Abhishek, Stefano. Having your support makes everything easier and more fun. I also want to thank all professors that have dealt with me in the first year.. and after: Dieter, Brad and Tewari. I learnt and I keep learning a lot from all of you. I want to thank my friends in Clemson, that have become my family here throught these two years: Komal, Bipin, Subash, Prakash, P.K., Mihiri, Nick, Steve, Wren, Chuanchang. A particular thanks goes to Komal: without you I probably would have become crazy after the first few weeks of classes and teaching and I wouldn’t have enjoyed all of this. You have been a friend, a sis and sometimes also a mom. There is no way I can be in Clemson without you. Then to all three bros: with our laughter and crappy jokes, it was possible to forget everything and to move on from every good or bad week. I love y’all so much! iii And then of course there are all the people far away that have supported me since the first time I said I wanted to flea the country. Ma maman cherie ador´ee, that have always encouraged me for every choice in my life. My brother and my dad, that everytime something happens to me here, they spread the news in the whole Fermo. My friends, that even with 6 hours of time delay, always kept in touch as we were 5 minutes away and with whom I could swear in Italian everytime this town made me go nuts! Love, Mimmi, grazie! To conclude I just want to say that I am grateful that I had this chance in my life. The chance to find a good advisor, good professors, and good friends. The chance to feel at home even being a non resident alien. And even if this is a small step, I know that many others will come in the next years. I love you all very much! Thank you! iv Table of Contents Title Page ................................................. i Abstract .................................................. ii Acknowledgments ............................................ iii List of Tables ............................................... vi List of Figures .............................................. vii 1 Introduction ............................................. 1 1.1 Historical background and Observational characteristics .................... 1 1.2 Main AGN components ..................................... 4 1.3 Unification ........................................... 9 1.4 Blazars ............................................. 12 2 Facilities ............................................... 18 2.1 Imaging in the hard X-ray regime ............................... 18 2.2 The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array .......................... 24 2.3 Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) .............................. 26 2.4 Swift ............................................... 30 2.5 Gamma-Ray Burst Optical/Near-Infrared Detector ....................... 33 3 MeV Blazars through Nustar Eyes ................................. 35 3.1 Observations .......................................... 36 3.2 Results .............................................. 38 3.3 Discussion ............................................ 44 4 Conclusions and Outlook ...................................... 48 4.1 Conclusions ........................................... 48 4.2 Outlook ............................................. 49 Appendices ................................................ 51 A Relativistic Beaming ...................................... 52 B Radiative Processes ....................................... 58 C Modeling ............................................ 69 Bibliography ............................................... 76 v List of Tables 1.1 Table of AGN subclasses .................................... 10 2.1 Tableof NuSTAR optics parameters .............................. 24 2.2 Table of Observatory Performance Parameters (adapted from Harrison et al., 2013) ..... 26 2.3 Focal Plane Parameters (adapted from Harrison et al., 2013) ................. 26 2.4 LAT instrument parameters and Estimated Performance (adapted from Atwood et al., 2009) . 28 2.5 XRT instrument parameters (adapted from Burrows et al., 2005) ............... 32 2.6 UVOT instrument parameters (adapted from Roming et al., 2005) .............. 32 3.1 Table of Observations and Spectral Parameters ......................... 40 3.2 Summary of the parameters used/derived from the SED modeling of three MeV blazars ... 41 3.3 Table of Black-Hole Masses .................................. 44 vi List of Figures 1.1 Superluminal motion of M87 .................................. 3 1.2 A schematic of an AGN with relativistic jets .......................... 5 1.3 Keplerian disk around a black hole ............................... 7 1.4 Quasar spectrum ........................................ 7 1.5 Torus and jet emission from AGN ............................... 10 1.6 AGN unification ......................................... 12 1.7 Typical SED of a blazar ..................................... 13 1.8 Blazar sequence ......................................... 15 1.9 SEDs of high redshift blazars .................................. 16 2.1 Scanning collimators and Coded masks ............................ 20 2.2 X-ray reflectivities for different materials ........................... 21 2.3 Schematic of an X-ray mirror .................................. 22 2.4 Absorption efficiency of different materials .......................... 23 2.5 NuSTAR observatory diagram .................................. 24 2.6 Effective collecting area of NuSTAR .............................. 25 2.7 NuSTAR focal plane ...................................... 26 2.8 Schematic diagram of the Fermi-LAT instrument. ....................... 27 2.9 Fermi tracker array ......................................
Recommended publications
  • Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 149
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [ X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 1-16417 NUSTAR ENERGY L.P. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 74-2956831 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 2330 North Loop 1604 West 78248 San Antonio, Texas (Zip Code) (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (210) 918-2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common units representing partnership interests listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Securities registered pursuant to 12(g) of the Act: None. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Flight PSF Calibration of the Nustar Hard X-Ray Optics
    In-flight PSF calibration of the NuSTAR hard X-ray optics Hongjun Ana, Kristin K. Madsenb, Niels J. Westergaardc, Steven E. Boggsd, Finn E. Christensenc, William W. Craigd,e, Charles J. Haileyf, Fiona A. Harrisonb, Daniel K. Sterng, William W. Zhangh aDepartment of Physics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2T8, Canada; bCahill Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; cDTU Space, National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 327, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark; dSpace Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; eLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA; fColumbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, New York NY 10027, USA; gJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA; hGoddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA ABSTRACT We present results of the point spread function (PSF) calibration of the hard X-ray optics of the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR). Immediately post-launch, NuSTAR has observed bright point sources such as Cyg X-1, Vela X-1, and Her X-1 for the PSF calibration. We use the point source observations taken at several off-axis angles together with a ray-trace model to characterize the in-orbit angular response, and find that the ray-trace model alone does not fit the observed event distributions and applying empirical corrections to the ray-trace model improves the fit significantly. We describe the corrections applied to the ray-trace model and show that the uncertainties in the enclosed energy fraction (EEF) of the new PSF model is ∼<3% for extraction ′′ apertures of R ∼> 60 with no significant energy dependence.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Nustar's Mirrors
    20 | ASK MAGAZINE | STORY Title BY BUILDING NUSTAR’S MIRRORS Intro Many NASA projects involve designing and building one-of-a-kind spacecraft and instruments. Created for particular, unique missions, they are custom-made, more like works of technological art than manufactured objects. Occasionally, a mission calls for two identical satellites (STEREO, the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory, for instance). Sometimes multiple parts of an instrument are nearly identical: the eighteen hexagonal beryllium mirror segments that will form the James Webb Space Telescope’s mirror are one example. But none of this is mass production or anything close to it. nn GuisrCh/ASA N:tide CrothoP N:tide GuisrCh/ASA nn Niko Stergiou, a contractor at Goddard Space Flight Center, helped manufacture the 9,000 mirror segments that make up the optics unit in the NuSTAR mission. ASK MAGAZINE | 21 BY WILLIAM W. ZHANG The mirror segments my group has built for NuSTAR, the the interior surface and a bakeout, dries into a smooth and clean Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array, are not mass produced surface, very much like glazed ceramic tiles. Finally we had to either, but we make them on a scale that may be unique at NASA: map the temperatures inside each oven to ensure they would we created more than 20,000 mirror segments over a period of two provide a uniform heating environment so the glass sheets years. In other words, we’re talking about some middle ground could slump in a controlled and gradual way. Any “wrinkles” between one-of-a-kind custom work and industrial production.
    [Show full text]
  • Nustar Observatory Guide
    NuSTAR Guest Observer Program NuSTAR Observatory Guide Version 3.2 (June 2016) NuSTAR Science Operations Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA NASA Goddard Spaceflight Center, Greenbelt, MD nustar.caltech.edu heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/nustar/index.html i Revision History Revision Date Editor Comments D1,2,3 2014-08-01 NuSTAR SOC Initial draft 1.0 2014-08-15 NuSTAR GOF Release for AO-1 Addition of more information about CZT 2.0 2014-10-30 NuSTAR SOC detectors in section 3. 3.0 2015-09-24 NuSTAR SOC Update to section 4 for release of AO-2 Update for NuSTARDAS v1.6.0 release 3.1 2016-05-10 NuSTAR SOC (nusplitsc, Section 5) 3.2 2016-06-15 NuSTAR SOC Adjustment to section 9 ii Table of Contents Revision History ......................................................................................................................................................... ii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 NuSTAR Program Organization ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. The NuSTAR observatory .................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 NuSTAR Performance ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Explorer Program
    The Explorer Program Presentation to the Astrophysics Subcommittee Wilton Sanders Explorer Program Scientist Astrophysics Division NASA Science Mission Directorate November 19, 2013 1 Astrophysics Explorer Program • The Astrophysics and the Heliophysics Explorer Programs are separate. • Current Astrophysics Explorer Missions: - Operating (and will be included in the 2014 Senior Review) • Swift (MIDEX), launched 2004 November 20 • Suzaku (MO – partnered with JAXA), launched 2005 July 10 • NuSTAR (SMEX), launched 2012 June 13 - In Development • ASTRO-H (MO – partnered with JAXA), scheduled for launch in 2015 - In Formulation • NICER (MO), targeted for transportation to ISS in 2016 • TESS (EX), targeted for launch in 2017 • Future AOs - SMEX and MO in late summer/early fall 2014 for launch ~ 2020 - EX and MO NET 2016 for launch ~ 2022 2 2014 Astrophysics Explorer AO • Community Announcement released on 2013 November 12 that NASA will solicit proposals for SMEX missions and Missions of Opportunity. • Draft AO targeted for spring 2014, with Explorer Workshop ~ 2 weeks later. • Final AO targeted for late summer/early fall 2014, with Pre-Proposal Conference ~ 3 weeks after final AO release. Proposals due 90 days after AO release. • PI cost cap $125M (FY2015$) for SMEX, not including cost of ELV or transportation to the ISS. • MOs allowed in all three categories: Partner MO, New Missions using Existing Spacecraft, or Small Complete Mission, including those requiring flight on the ISS. • PI cost cap $35M for sub-orbital class MOs, which include ultra-long duration balloons, suborbital reusable launch vehicles, and CubeSats. Other MOs (not suborbital-class) have a $65M PI cost cap. • Two-step process.
    [Show full text]
  • Observational Artifacts of Nustar: Ghost-Rays and Stray-Light
    Observational Artifacts of NuSTAR: Ghost-rays and Stray-light Kristin K. Madsena, Finn E. Christensenb, William W. Craigc, Karl W. Forstera, Brian W. Grefenstettea, Fiona A. Harrisona, Hiromasa Miyasakaa, and Vikram Ranaa aCalifornia Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd, Pasadena, USA bDTU Space, National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Elektronvej 327, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark cSpace Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA ABSTRACT The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR), launched in June 2012, flies two conical approximation Wolter-I mirrors at the end of a 10.15 m mast. The optics are coated with multilayers of Pt/C and W/Si that operate from 3{80 keV. Since the optical path is not shrouded, aperture stops are used to limit the field of view from background and sources outside the field of view. However, there is still a sliver of sky (∼1.0{4.0◦) where photons may bypass the optics altogether and fall directly on the detector array. We term these photons Stray-light. Additionally, there are also photons that do not undergo the focused double reflections in the optics and we term these Ghost Rays. We present detailed analysis and characterization of these two components and discuss how they impact observations. Finally, we discuss how they could have been prevented and should be in future observatories. Keywords: NuSTAR, Optics, Satellite 1. INTRODUCTION 1 arXiv:1711.02719v1 [astro-ph.IM] 7 Nov 2017 The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR), launched in June 2012, is a focusing X-ray observatory operating in the energy range 3{80 keV.
    [Show full text]
  • Collision Avoidance Operations in a Multi-Mission Environment
    AIAA 2014-1745 SpaceOps Conferences 5-9 May 2014, Pasadena, CA Proceedings of the 2014 SpaceOps Conference, SpaceOps 2014 Conference Pasadena, CA, USA, May 5-9, 2014, Paper DRAFT ONLY AIAA 2014-1745. Collision Avoidance Operations in a Multi-Mission Environment Manfred Bester,1 Bryce Roberts,2 Mark Lewis,3 Jeremy Thorsness,4 Gregory Picard,5 Sabine Frey,6 Daniel Cosgrove,7 Jeffrey Marchese,8 Aaron Burgart,9 and William Craig10 Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450 With the increasing number of manmade object orbiting Earth, the probability for close encounters or on-orbit collisions is of great concern to spacecraft operators. The presence of debris clouds from various disintegration events amplifies these concerns, especially in low- Earth orbits. The University of California, Berkeley currently operates seven NASA spacecraft in various orbit regimes around the Earth and the Moon, and actively participates in collision avoidance operations. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory provide conjunction analyses. In two cases, collision avoidance operations were executed to reduce the risks of on-orbit collisions. With one of the Earth orbiting THEMIS spacecraft, a small thrust maneuver was executed to increase the miss distance for a predicted close conjunction. For the NuSTAR observatory, an attitude maneuver was executed to minimize the cross section with respect to a particular conjunction geometry. Operations for these two events are presented as case studies. A number of experiences and lessons learned are included. Nomenclature dLong = geographic longitude increment ΔV = change in velocity dZgeo = geostationary orbit crossing distance increment i = inclination Pc = probability of collision R = geostationary radius RE = Earth radius σ = standard deviation Zgeo = geostationary orbit crossing distance I.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2009.03244V1 [Astro-Ph.HE] 7 Sep 2020
    Advances in Understanding High-Mass X-ray Binaries with INTEGRAL and Future Directions Peter Kretschmara, Felix Furst¨ b, Lara Sidolic, Enrico Bozzod, Julia Alfonso-Garzon´ e, Arash Bodagheef, Sylvain Chatyg,h, Masha Chernyakovai,j, Carlo Ferrignod, Antonios Manousakisk,l, Ignacio Negueruelam, Konstantin Postnovn,o, Adamantia Paizisc, Pablo Reigp,q, Jose´ Joaqu´ın Rodes-Rocar,s, Sergey Tsygankovt,u, Antony J. Birdv, Matthias Bissinger ne´ Kuhnel¨ w, Pere Blayx, Isabel Caballeroy, Malcolm J. Coev, Albert Domingoe, Victor Doroshenkoz,u, Lorenzo Duccid,z, Maurizio Falangaaa, Sergei A. Grebenevu, Victoria Grinbergz, Paul Hemphillab, Ingo Kreykenbohmac,w, Sonja Kreykenbohm nee´ Fritzad,ac, Jian Liae, Alexander A. Lutovinovu, Silvia Mart´ınez-Nu´nez˜ af, J. Miguel Mas-Hessee, Nicola Masettiag,ah, Vanessa A. McBrideai,aj,ak, Andrii Neronovh,d, Katja Pottschmidtal,am,Jer´ omeˆ Rodriguezg, Patrizia Romanoan, Richard E. Rothschildao, Andrea Santangeloz, Vito Sgueraag,Rudiger¨ Staubertz, John A. Tomsickap, Jose´ Miguel Torrejon´ r,s, Diego F. Torresaq,ar, Roland Walterd,Jorn¨ Wilmsac,w, Colleen A. Wilson-Hodgeas, Shu Zhangat Abstract High mass X-ray binaries are among the brightest X-ray sources in the Milky Way, as well as in nearby Galaxies. Thanks to their highly variable emissions and complex phenomenology, they have attracted the interest of the high energy astrophysical community since the dawn of X-ray Astronomy. In more recent years, they have challenged our comprehension of physical processes in many more energy bands, ranging from the infrared to very high energies. In this review, we provide a broad but concise summary of the physical processes dominating the emission from high mass X-ray binaries across virtually the whole electromagnetic spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Spectra of Gamma-Ray Bursts at High Energies
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 1986 ON THE SPECTRA OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS AT HIGH ENERGIES STEVEN MICHAEL MATZ University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation MATZ, STEVEN MICHAEL, "ON THE SPECTRA OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS AT HIGH ENERGIES" (1986). Doctoral Dissertations. 1483. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/1483 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec­ tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu­ ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polarized Spectral Energy Distribution of NGC 4151
    MNRAS 496, 215–222 (2020) doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1533 Advance Access publication 2020 June 3 The polarized spectral energy distribution of NGC 4151 F. Marin ,1‹ J. Le Cam,2 E. Lopez-Rodriguez,3 M. Kolehmainen,1 B. L. Babler4 and M. R. Meade4 1Universite´ de Strasbourg, CNRS, Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg, UMR 7550, F-67000 Strasbourg, France 2Institut d’optique Graduate School, 91120 Palaiseau, France 3SOFIA Science Center, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 4Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/496/1/215/5850780 by guest on 30 September 2021 Accepted 2020 May 25. Received 2020 May 15; in original form 2020 March 17 ABSTRACT NGC 4151 is among the most well-studied Seyfert galaxies that does not suffer from strong obscuration along the observer’s line of sight. This allows to probe the central active galactic nucleus (AGN) engine with photometry, spectroscopy, reverberation mapping, or interferometry. Yet, the broad-band polarization from NGC 4151 has been poorly examined in the past despite the fact that polarimetry gives us a much cleaner view of the AGN physics than photometry or spectroscopy alone. In this paper, we compile the 0.15–89.0 μm total and polarized fluxes of NGC 4151 from archival and new data in order to examine the physical processes at work in the heart of this AGN. We demonstrate that, from the optical to the near-infrared (IR) band, the polarized spectrum of NGC 4151 shows a much bluer power-law spectral index than that of the total flux, corroborating the presence of an optically thick, locally heated accretion flow, at least in its near-IR emitting radii.
    [Show full text]
  • Cygnus X-3 and the Case for Simultaneous Multifrequency
    by France Anne-Dominic Cordova lthough the visible radiation of Cygnus A X-3 is absorbed in a dusty spiral arm of our gal- axy, its radiation in other spectral regions is observed to be extraordinary. In a recent effort to better understand the causes of that radiation, a group of astrophysicists, including the author, carried 39 Cygnus X-3 out an unprecedented experiment. For two days in October 1985 they directed toward the source a variety of instru- ments, located in the United States, Europe, and space, hoping to observe, for the first time simultaneously, its emissions 9 18 Gamma Rays at frequencies ranging from 10 to 10 Radiation hertz. The battery of detectors included a very-long-baseline interferometer consist- ing of six radio telescopes scattered across the United States and Europe; the Na- tional Radio Astronomy Observatory’s Very Large Array in New Mexico; Caltech’s millimeter-wavelength inter- ferometer at the Owens Valley Radio Ob- servatory in California; NASA’s 3-meter infrared telescope on Mauna Kea in Ha- waii; and the x-ray monitor aboard the European Space Agency’s EXOSAT, a sat- ellite in a highly elliptical, nearly polar orbit, whose apogee is halfway between the earth and the moon. In addition, gamma- Wavelength (m) ray detectors on Mount Hopkins in Ari- zona, on the rim of Haleakala Crater in Fig. 1. The energy flux at the earth due to electromagnetic radiation from Cygnus X-3 as a Hawaii, and near Leeds, England, covered function of the frequency and, equivalently, energy and wavelength of the radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Northbrae Community Church January 13, 2010 7:00 P.M
    Please Note: BERKELEY PUBLIC LIBRARY Special Location BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES REGULAR Meeting AGENDA Northbrae Community Church January 13, 2010 7:00 p.m. 941 The Alameda (cross street Los Angeles) The Board of Library Trustees may act on any item on this agenda. I. CALL TO ORDER II. WORKSHOP SESSION ON MEASURE FF NORTH BRANCH LIBRARY UPDATE A. Presentation by Architectural Resource Group / Tom Eliot Fisch Architects on the Schematic Design Phase; and Staff Report on the Process, Community Input and Next Steps. B. Public Comments on this item only (Proposed 15-minute time limit, with speakers allowed 3 minutes each) C. Board Discussion III. PRELIMINARY MATTERS A. Public Comments (Proposed 30-minute time limit, with speakers allowed 3 minutes each) B. Report from library employees and unions, discussion of staff issues Comments / responses to reports and issues addressed in packet. C. Report from Board of Library Trustees D. Approval of Agenda IV. PRESENTATION A. Report on Branch Renovation Program Presented by Steve Dewan, Kitchell CEM V. CONSENT CALENDAR The Board will consider removal and addition of items to the Consent Calendar prior to voting on the Consent Calendar. All items remaining on the Consent Calendar will be approved in one motion. A. Approve minutes of December 9, 2009 Regular Meeting Recommendation: Approve the minutes of the December 9, 2009 regular meeting of the Board of Library Trustees. B. Closure of the Tool Lending Library for Annual Tool Maintenance from February 28 Through March 13, 2010 Recommendation: Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the closure of the Tool Lending Library from February 28 through March 13, 2010 and reopening on March 16, 2010.
    [Show full text]