Fiona Macpherson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fiona Macpherson Fiona Macpherson Representational Theories of Phenomenal Character Ph.D. Thesis Department of Philosophy, University of Stirling 31 August 2000 i Contents Acknowledgements iv Abstract v Chapter 1 - Realism and Naturalism in Philosophy of Mind 1 1 - Introduction 1 2 - The First Stages of Describing the Mind 3 3 - Realism, Naturalism and Methodology 6 3.1 - Realism 6 3.2 - Non-Realist Alternatives 11 3.3 - Naturalism 12 3.3.1 - Epistemological Naturalism 14 3.3.2 - Metaphysical Naturalism 15 3.3.3 - Methodological Naturalism 18 3.4 - Some Reflections on Naturalism and Realism 19 3.5 - Naturalist Methodologies in Recent Philosophy of Mind 21 3.5.1 - Identification 21 3.5.2 - Functionalism 23 3.5.3 - Supervenience 26 3.5.4 - The Causal, Explanatory or Law-Like Methodology 31 Chapter 2 - Phenomenal Character and Content 35 1 - Introduction 35 2 - General Overview 36 3 - Distinguishing Experiences from Propositional Attitudes 39 4 - The Phenomenal Character of Experiences and Sensations 45 5 - Ascribing Content to Experiences and Sensations 57 5.1 - The Non-Intentionality of Experiences 58 5.2 - The Intentionality of Experiences 65 5.2.1 - Ascribing Conceptual Content to Perceptual Experiences 68 5.2.2 - Ascribing Non-Conceptual Content to Perceptual Experiences 71 5.2.3 - An Objection to Nonconceptual Content 81 Chapter 3 - Further Representationalist Claims 92 1 - Identifying Phenomenal Character and the Content of Experience 92 2 - Differentiating Experiences from other Representational States 101 ii 3 - Knowing about Experiences 107 4 - Experiences, Animals and Oblivion 114 5 - Representationalism and Higher-Order Theories of Consciousness 121 6 - The Problem of Mechanism and the Status of the Representational Theory 126 7 - Assessment of Representationalism 130 Chapter 4 - Cross-Modal Perception and Experiences of Pitch 134 1 - Introduction 134 2 - Cross-Modal Perception 134 2.1 - Content and Sensory Modalities 135 2.2 - Prosthetic Vision 140 3 - Experiences of Pitch 143 3.1 - What is Perfect Pitch? 143 3.2 - Perfect Pitch, Experiences and Theories of Content 145 3.3 - The Implicit/Explicit Distinction in Computational Systems 150 3.4 - Implicit and Explicit Content in Experience 155 3.5 - The Implicit/Explicit Distinction Applied to Perfect 162 and Relative Pitch and the Theories of Content 3.6 - The Phenomenology of Experience 165 3.7 - Conclusion 172 Chapter 5 - Ambiguous Figures 174 1 - Introduction 174 2 - Representationalism and Content 174 3 - Ambiguous Figures: Introduction 175 4 - Ambiguous Figures and Changes in Phenomenal Character 180 5 - Ambiguous Figures: A Preliminary Challenge 183 6 - Ambiguous Figures: The Second Challenge 189 7 - Scenario Content and Protopropositional Content 196 8 - Conclusion 203 Chapter 6 - Inverted Spectra 205 1 - Introduction 205 2 - The Basic Inversion and the Representationalist Response 207 3 - Inverted Earth and Problems for Representationalism 213 3.1 - Description of Inverted Earth and Block's Construal of the Problem 213 3.2 - The Teleological Response 216 3.3 - The Causal Covariation Response 221 3.3.1 - Initial Moves 221 iii 3.3.2 - Defending Content Changes 223 3.3.3 - Arguments Against Tye's Conception of Phenomenal Memory 229 3.3.4 - The Counter-Factual Response 236 4 - Conclusion 243 Chapter 7 - Novel Colours 245 1 - Introduction 245 2 - After-images, Phosphenes and Swirling Visual Experiences 245 3 - Pain and Orgasm 247 4 - Experiences of Novel Colours 252 4.1 - The Representational Account of Colour Experiences 252 4.2 - Experiences of Novel Colours 256 4.3 - Why Reddish-Green is a Counter-Example to Representationalism 262 4.4 - 1st Reply - There is a Reddish-Green Objective Property 263 4.5 - Are Reddish-Green Objects Possible Objects? 267 4.6 - Reddish-Green Experiences as Representations of Red and Green 268 4.7 - Considerations Regarding the Experiment and Possibilities 272 Chapter 8 - Phenomenal Character, Content and Consciousness 278 1 - Introduction 278 2 - The Relationship Between Content and Phenomenology 278 2.1 - Initial Considerations: Inversions and Experiences that Lack Content 279 2.2 - Further Considerations: Ambiguous Figures 285 3 - Consciousness 287 3.1 - The Problem 287 3.2 - The Representationalist Solution 292 3.3 - Experiences and the Cognitive System: Dissociation Phenomena 294 3.4 - Appropriate Explanations 306 3.4.1 - Tye's Explanation 306 3.4.2 - Dretske's Explanation 308 4 - Summary of Results 313 5 - Concluding Reflections 314 Bibliography 322 iv Acknowledgements I would like to express my utmost gratitude to Professor Alan Millar who was my principal supervisor. He has been patient, kind, critical and, above all, encouraging. His own writings on the mind and on perception were an influential starting point for me. His philosophical insight, comments on my work, and our long chats together have had a large influence on this work and have made it far better than it could have been otherwise. I hope he will forgive me for the nail-biting finish and remember my time at Stirling with fondness, as I will. I would also like to thank greatly my other supervisor Dr. José Luis Bermúdez. His work on nonconceptual content had a notable impact on my thinking. He helped with the preparation of the chapters of this thesis in their original form as papers. He read many versions before I was due to present them and I always felt that if I had got them past José I could face an audience with some confidence. In addition, he helped and encouraged me to give papers and to apply for grants. I also gained much practical and philosophical acumen working for him on the Consciousness in the Natural World Project. I would also like to thank the other members of the philosophy department at Stirling University. They made it a good place to be a graduate student. In particular, I would like to thank Peter Sullivan and Michael Brady for their philosophical comments and their many kindnesses. I would also like to mention Alex Byrne at MIT, with whom I had many interesting philosophical conversations during my year abroad as a Visiting Kennedy Scholar at Harvard. Last, but not least, thanks to my Mum for her unfailing support and all her love. v Abstract This thesis is an examination and critique of naturalistic representational theories of phenomenal character. Phenomenal character refers to the distinctive quality that perceptual and sensational experiences seem to have; it is identified with 'what it is like' to undergo experiences. The central claims of representationalism are that phenomenal character is identical with the content of experience and that all representational states, bearing appropriate relations to the cognitive system, are conscious experiences. These claims are taken to explain both how conscious experiential states arise and their nature. After examining the desiderata for naturalistic explanations, I argue that theories which ascribe nonconceptual content to experiences are the most plausible versions of representationalism. Further, causal covariation and teleological theories yield distinctive and interesting representationalist positions, hence, they become the focus of this study. To assess representationalism, I investigate whether all differences in phenomenal character can be correlated with differences in content. I claim that a useful distinction can be drawn between implicit and explicit content, which allows one to best describe the phenomena of perfect and relative pitch. I then argue that ambiguous figures show that two experiences can have the same content but different phenomenal character. I explicate the Inverted Earth hypothesis and claim that to identify content and phenomenal character, representationalists either have to condone the possibility of philosophical zombies, or hold that people lack authoritative first-person knowledge of their current experiences. Both these positions are unpalatable. Finally, I argue that representationalists cannot ascribe contents to experiences of novel colours to account for their phenomenal character. I also question, in light of vi dissociation phenomena, whether there is one distinctive relationship that all experiences bear to the cognitive system. I conclude that phenomenal character cannot be identical with the type of content under investigation, and that naturalistic representationalist theories cannot fully explain conscious experience. Chapter 1 1 Chapter 1 - Realism and Naturalism in Philosophy of Mind 1 - Introduction A dominant concern of modern analytic philosophy of mind is the ontological and epistemological status of the mental states, properties and events that we purport to refer to in our common discourse describing ourselves, other humans and many animals. Mentalistic vocabulary and explanations pervade our language. We describe human beings and many kinds of animals as having minds. We claim that ourselves and others are the subjects of sensations, perceptions, thoughts, desires and emotions. We often explain and predict, with considerable success, the interactions that occur between a creature and its environment in terms of what the creature perceived, felt, believed and desired. Furthermore, our mental lives are considered to be important and even essential to who and what we are. In light of this, many philosophers have sought to give a realist theory of the mental states and events that we speak of every day and thus to give a place to the referents of folk psychology in their ontology. At the same time, many philosophers are concerned with whether the professed
Recommended publications
  • Tim Crane CV
    Curriculum Vitae Tim Crane Professor of Philosophy, Central European University Personal Born: 1962 Nationality: British Address: Department of Philosophy, CEU, Nádor utca 9, 1051 BUDAPEST, Hungary website http://www.timcrane.com Main research areas Philosophy of mind, philosophy of psychology, metaphysics Other areas of interest Philosophy of language, epistemology, Leibniz, Descartes, religion Education 1981–84: University of Durham (BA 1984) 1984–85: University of York (MA 1985) 1985–89: University of Cambridge (PhD 1989) Career 1989-90: Research Assistant, Department of Philosophy, King’s College London 1990-96: Lecturer in Philosophy, University College London (UCL) 1996-2002: Reader in Philosophy, University College London (UCL) 2002-09: Professor of Philosophy, University College London (UCL) 2005-08: Founding Director, Institute of Philosophy, University of London 2009-2017: Knightbridge Professor of Philosophy, University of Cambridge & Fellow of Peterhouse, Cambridge from 2017: Professor of Philosophy, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary Honours and Prizes 2008: Member, Academia Europaea (by election) 2015: Annual Prize of the Italian Society for Neuroethics and Philosophy of Neuroscience, for contributions to the dialogue between philosophy and the sciences of the mind 2016-17: President, Aristotelian Society Publications (122) My work has been translated into Arabic, Chinese, Croatian, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish and Swedish. Authored books (6) Tim Crane CV page !1 The Meaning of Belief: Religion from an Atheist’s Point of View (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2017) —-Reviews in The New York Times, Publishers' Weekly, The Wall Street Journal, TLS, THE, Los Angeles Review of Books, The Tablet, Mind, New York Review of Books —German translation (Suhrkamp Verlag) forthcoming —Hungarian translation forthcoming Aspects of Psychologism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • HPS: Annual Report 2010-2011
    Contents The Department Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..2 Staff and affiliates………………………………………………………………………3 Visitors and students……………………………………………………………………4 Comings and goings……………………………………………………………………5 Roles and responsibilities………………………………………………………………6 Prizes, projects and honours……………………………………………………………8 Seminars and special lectures…………………………………………………………..9 Students Student statistics……………………………………………………………………….10 Part II essay and dissertation titles…………………………………………………….11 MPhil and Part III essay and dissertation titles………………………………………..14 PhD theses……………………………………………………………………………..19 The Library Annual report of the Whipple Library…………………………………………………21 The Museum Annual report of the Whipple Museum of the History of Science…………………….25 Individuals Annual reports of members of the Department……………………………………….33 Seminar Programmes Michaelmas Term 2010………………………………………………………………74 Lent Term 2011………………………………………………………………………87 Easter Term 2011…………………………………………………………………….98 Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge Free School Lane, Cambridge, CB2 3RH Telephone: 01223 334500 Fax: 01223 334554 www.hps.cam.ac.uk 1 The Department Introduction In the academic year 2010-2011 the Department of History and Philosophy of Science has been thriving. Funding in excess of £3 million was successfully secured from the European Research Council, several new members of staff joined the Department and even some new arrivals were welcomed into the world; perhaps potential students in the future! The Department continues to
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Updated March 24, 2021 1 CURRICULUM VITAE Dr José Luis Bermúdez Professor of Philosophy Samuel Rhea Gammon Professor of Liberal Arts Texas A&M University Work address Department of Philosophy, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843-4223 Email [email protected] Citizenship British and Colombian Place of Birth Bogotá, Colombia US Residency Status Permanent resident * * * Areas of Specialisation Philosophy of Mind and Language; Cognitive Science; Decision Theory and Theory of Rationality Areas of Competence: History of Philosophy; Mathematical Logic Education 1980 - 1984: St. Paul’s School, London (scholar) 1985 - 1988: B.A./M.A. (Hons.) in Philosophy, Cambridge University (King’s College). 1988 -1992: PhD The Unanswerability of the Sceptical Challenge, Cambridge University (King’s College) Previous Appointments • Associate Provost, Texas A&M University (2014 – 2015) • Dean, College of Liberal Arts, Texas A&M University (2010 – 2014) • Director, Center for Programs, Washington University in St Louis (2006 – 2010) • Director, Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology Program, Washington University in St Louis (2003 – 2010) • Professor of Philosophy, Washington University in St Louis (2003 – 2010) • Interim Vice-Dean for Research, Faculty of Arts, University of Stirling (2003) • Chair, Department of Philosophy, University of Stirling (2002 – 2003) • Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Stirling (2000 – 2003) • Reader (equivalent: Associate Professor, promotion awarded for distinction in research), Department of Philosophy, University of Stirling (1999 – 2000) • Lecturer, (equivalent: Assistant Professor) Department of Philosophy, University of Stirling (1996 – 1999) • British Academy Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Cambridge (1993 – 1996) • Member, Interdisciplinary Research Project on Spatial Representation at King’s College, Cambridge (1992 – 1993) Visiting Appointments • Visiting Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Rijeka, Croatia (May, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Macpherson CV January 2021 Copy
    Fiona Macpherson January 2021 Curriculum Vitae Department of Philosophy University of Glasgow Glasgow G12 8QQ United Kingdom Phone: +44 (0)7837 059 652 Email: [email protected] URL: www.gla.ac.uk/people/fionamacpherson Present Position Professor of Philosophy 2011 – present; Senior Lecturer 2008 – 2011; Lecturer 2004 – 2008 Director of the Centre for the Study of Perceptual Experience 2004 – present University of Glasgow Visiting Positions Visiting Professor Institut Jean-Nicod École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris 15 March – 15 April 2019 Visiting Professor Department of Philosophy University of Kentucky September 2017 and 2018 Visiting Faculty National Endowment for the Humanities Summer Institute on Presupposition and Perception, Cornell University, USA June 2016 Visiting Professor Trnava University, Slovakia October 2015 Visiting Professor Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Studies, University of London, UK January –April 2013 Visiting Professor Umeå University, Sweden October 2011 Previous Positions Research Fellow Centre for Consciousness, Philosophy Program Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University (paid position – took unpaid leave from Glasgow to take up this position) September 2005 – September 2006, February – May 2008 & February – May 2009 Rosamund Chambers Research Fellow in Philosophy Girton College, University of Cambridge 2002 – 2004 (curtailed by one year to take up the position at Glasgow) Teaching Fellow Department of Logic and Metaphysics, University of St. Andrews 2000 – 2002 (curtailed by one year to take up the position at Cambridge) Research Assistant Consciousness in the Natural World Project, University of Stirling 1997 – 1998 & 1999 – 2000 (part-time) Education PhD in Philosophy University of Stirling, 2000 Visiting Fellow Harvard University, 1998 – 1999 MLitt in Philosophy with Distinction in the Dissertation University of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialized Visual Experiences
    The Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 71,No.12021 ISSN 0031-8094 doi: 10.1093/pq/pqaa018 Advance Access Publication 20th April 2020 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/pq/article/71/1/74/5822749 by Otto G. Richter Library -University of Miami user on 28 January 2021 SPECIALIZED VISUAL EXPERIENCES By Casey Landers Through extensive training, experts acquire specialized knowledge and abilities. In this paper, I argue that experts also acquire specialized visual experiences. Specifically, I articulate and defend the account that experts enjoy visual experiences that represent gestalt properties through perceptual learning. I survey an array of empirical studies on face perception and perceptual expertise that support this account. I also look at studies on perceptual adaptation that some might argue present a problem for my account. I show how the data are subject to an interpretation that is friendly to it. Last, I address two theoretical objections to the claim that visual experiences represent gestalt properties. Keywords: visual expertise, visual experience, gestalt property, perceptual learning, rich content. Experts have specialized knowledge and abilities. This paper concerns whether experts could also have specialized visual experiences. What I have in mind by ‘specialized visual experience’ is that even though both an expert and a novice receive the same stimulus input and have normally functioning visual systems, the expert enjoys a different visual experience than the novice. I will refer to the thesis that experts enjoy specialized visual experiences as ‘Specialized’. In this paper, I present an account that shows how Specialized could be true. The account comes in two parts. The first is about what kinds of prop- erties specialized visual experiences represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Review 2013 the Royal Society of Edinburgh
    cover:review2012 24/05/2013 15:04 Page 1 The Royal Society of Edinburgh The Royal Society ofEdinburgh Review 2013 Review 2013 Printed in Great Britain by Henry Ling Limited, Dorchester, DT1 1HD ISSN 1476-4342 THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH REVIEW OF THE SESSION 2011-2012 PUBLISHED BY THE RSE SCOTLAND FOUNDATION ISSN 1476-4342 The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street Edinburgh, EH2 2PQ Telephone : 0131 240 5000 Fax : 0131 240 5024 email : [email protected] Scottish Charity No SC000470 Printed in Great Britain by Henry Ling Limited, Dorchester, DT1 1HD THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH REVIEW OF THE SESSION 2011-2012 PUBLISHED BY THE RSE SCOTLAND FOUNDATION ISSN 1476-4342 The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street Edinburgh, EH2 2PQ Telephone : 0131 240 5000 Fax : 0131 240 5024 email : [email protected] Scottish Charity No SC000470 Printed in Great Britain by Henry Ling Limited, Dorchester, DT1 1HD CONTENTS ACTIVITIES – SESSION 2011-2012 Proceedings of the Ordinary Meetings .............................. 3 Proceedings of the Statutory General Meeting ................. 5 Prize Lectures .................................................................. 41 Lectures ........................................................................... 51 Conferences, Workshops, Symposia, Seminars and Discussion Forums ......................................................... 133 Publications ................................................................... 151 Policy Advice .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Updated: June 2021 1 Susanna Claire Siegel Edgar Pierce Professor Of
    Updated: September 2021 Susanna Claire Siegel Edgar Pierce Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 Employment June 2017: Visiting Professor of Philosophy. École Normale Supérieure, Paris. January 2011-present: Edgar Pierce Professor of Philosophy, Harvard University. January 2013-2016: Professor II, CSMN. Oslo, Norway. January 2014-2016: Distinguished Visiting Research Professor, University of Birmingham. 2011-2012: Walter Channing Cabot Fellow, Harvard University. December 2005-December 2010: Professor of Philosophy, Harvard University. July 2004-December 2005: Associate Professor of Philosophy and John L. Loeb Associate Professor of the Humanities, Harvard University. July 1999-June 2004: Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Harvard University. Education September 1993 - May 1999: Cornell University, Ph.D. Philosophy, January 2000. Dissertation: Perception and Demonstrative Reference Awards and Grants • 2019 Centenary Fellow, Scots Philosophical Association, University of Glasgow • 2019-2020. Mind, Brain, and Behavior Faculty Award, for postdoc Fellow, Johannes Mahr. • 2015-2016. Director, NEH Summer Institute (with Nico Silins). Presupposition and Perception: Reasoning, Ethics, Politics, Aesthetics. Cornell University. • 2014-15. NSF Grant for Conference on Bayesian Theories of Perception and Epistemology. • 2011-2014. Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Partnership Development Grant. The Senses. PI: Mohan Matthen, University Toronto. Partners: Fiona Macpherson (Glasgow), Alex Byrne (MIT), Barry Smith (London Institute of Philosophy). • 2012-14, Co-Investigator, Belief and Mental Agency (Josefa Toribio, PI, University of Barcelona) MCINN Grant from the government of Spain. • 2012 Walter Channing Cabot Fellow. Prize for The Contents of Visual Experience. • 2012-13. Mind, Brain and Behavior Faculty Award, for Postdoc Fellow Eric Mandelbaum. • 2010-11. Radcliffe Exploratory Workshop: Prediction, Goals, and Stereotypes in Perception.
    [Show full text]