A Plan for Production

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Plan for Production n INTEGRATED DEFENSE SYSTEMS A plan for production culminated in the final proposal submitted “A large portion of our business is ef- Boeing team would use April 13. Now, the team is preparing for ficiently producing products for the highly discussions with NASA about the proposal competitive commercial marketplace. We Lean, space experience and awaiting NASA’s decision in August. looked across Boeing and tapped that exper- “We offer unique capability to NASA’s tise for our proposal,” Chilton said. in NASA’s Ares I rocket Ares I team. We bring value based on our NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Cen- experience in commercial, defense and ter in Huntsville, Ala., will manage the BY ED MEMI space programs, along with innovation contract to manufacture and assemble the and new advocacy and outreach efforts,” Ares I upper stage and is responsible for oeing is leveraging its cost- said Jim Chilton, vice president of Explo- integration and overall design of the Ares saving Lean manufacturing prac- ration Launch Systems. “We listened very family of rockets. Btices and human space flight closely to the customer, and that drove our Boeing is competing against an Alli- experience in its proposal to build the approach to meet their needs.” ant Techsystems–led team that includes upper stage of NASA’s Ares I rocket at Representatives of the Ares I capture Lockheed Martin and Pratt & Whitney NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility in team and the Space Exploration Engi- Rocketdyne. Boeing formed a team of sup- New Orleans. neering and Operations functional or- pliers on the Ares I upper stage production Ares I is the first of a new family of ganizations visited six facilities across that includes Hamilton Sundstrand, Moog, rockets NASA is designing to launch Boeing to survey and leverage company Northrop Grumman, Orion Propulsion, crews and cargo into low Earth orbit as large-scale production and manufactur- SUMMA Technology, United Space Alli- the United States steps up its efforts to re- ing expertise. The team visited facilities ance and United Launch Alliance. turn to the moon by 2020. For Boeing, the in San Antonio, Philadelphia, Seattle, “We waited until we had a good upper-stage production contract repre- St. Louis, El Segundo, Calif., and Macon, understanding of NASA’s program re- sents a key opportunity to support NASA’s Ga. Each visit included tours of produc- quirements before finalizing our team- Constellation space exploration program. tion facilities and detailed presentations ing relationships. We have a team that is The Ares I capture/proposal team start- from production and manufacturing tailored for this procurement and should ed its efforts more than a year ago; that subject-matter experts. do very well in the evaluation. We be- lieve NASA will see the benefit our team brings,” Chilton said. About half of Boeing’s business is in production programs like the upper stage. This artist’s conception of the Ares I crew GRAPHIC launch vehicle shows scheduled jettison “We know how to produce efficiently, on of the escape tower as the upper stage NASA schedule and on cost. We will share inno- powers its payload toward orbit. Boeing is vative Lean manufacturing concepts with competing to produce the upper stage for the Ares I, NASA’s first new human-rated NASA to provide additional cost reduc- launch vehicle since the space shuttle. tions,” Chilton said. “We know Lean man- ufacturing can help transform Michoud Assembly Facility using the best practic- es of our commercial airplanes, defense and space divisions.” Boeing’s Space Exploration unit also is busy competing to produce the instrument unit for the Ares I rocket, which sits below the crew exploration vehicle and on top of the upper stage. It includes the avionics and guidance system. The 309-foot-long (94 meters), two- stage Ares I rocket is capable of launching approximately 25 metric tons (27.6 tons) into low Earth orbit. It is slated for its first flight in 2009. n [email protected] BOEING FRONTIERS May 2007 25.
Recommended publications
  • ULA Atlas V Launch to Feature Full Complement of Aerojet Rocketdyne Solid Rocket Boosters
    April 13, 2018 ULA Atlas V Launch to Feature Full Complement of Aerojet Rocketdyne Solid Rocket Boosters SACRAMENTO, Calif., April 13, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The upcoming launch of the U.S. Air Force Space Command (AFSPC)-11 satellite aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida, will benefit from just over 1.74 million pounds of added thrust from five AJ-60A solid rocket boosters supplied by Aerojet Rocketdyne. The mission marks the eighth flight of the Atlas V 551 configuration, the most powerful Atlas V variant that has flown to date. The Atlas V 551 configuration features a 5-meter payload fairing, five AJ-60As and a Centaur upper stage powered by a single Aerojet Rocket RL10C-1 engine. This configuration of the U.S. government workhorse launch vehicle is capable of delivering 8,900 kilograms of payload to geostationary transfer orbit (GTO), and also has been used to send scientific probes to explore Jupiter and Pluto. The Centaur upper stage also uses smaller Aerojet Rocketdyne thrusters for pitch, yaw and roll control, while both stages of the Atlas V employ pressurization vessels built by Aerojet Rocketdyne's ARDÉ subsidiary. "The Atlas V is able to perform a wide variety of missions for both government and commercial customers, and the AJ-60A is a major factor in that versatility," said Aerojet Rocketdyne CEO and President Eileen Drake. "Aerojet Rocketdyne developed the AJ-60A specifically for the Atlas V, delivering the first booster just 42 months after the contract award, which underscores our team's ability to design and deliver large solid rocket motors in support of our nation's strategic goals and efforts to explore our solar system." The flight of the 100th AJ-60A, the largest monolithically wound solid rocket booster ever flown, took place recently as part of a complement of four that helped an Atlas V 541 place the nation's newest weather satellite into GTO.
    [Show full text]
  • Starliner Rudolf Spoor Vertregt-Raket Van De Hoofdredacteur
    Starliner Rudolf Spoor Vertregt-raket Van de hoofdredacteur: Ook de NVR ontsnapt niet aan de gevolgen van het Corona- virus: zoals u in de nieuwsbrief heeft kunnen lezen zijn we genoodzaakt geweest de voor maart, april en mei geplande evenementen op te schorten. In de tussentijd zijn online ruimtevaart-gerelateerde initiatieven zeer de moeite waard om te volgen, en in de nieuwsbrief heeft u daar ook een overzicht van kunnen vinden. De redactie heeft zijn best gedaan om ook in deze moeilijke tijden voor u een afwisselend nummer samen te stellen, met onder andere aandacht voor de lancering van de eerste Starliner, een studentenproject waarin een supersone para- Bij de voorplaat chute getest wordt, tests van een prototype maanrover op het DECOS terrein in Noordwijk en een uitgebreide analyse Kunstzinnige weergave van de lancering van de Vertregt-raket vanuit met moderne middelen van het Vertregt raketontwerp uit de Suriname. De vlammen zijn gebaseerd op die van andere raketten jaren ‘50. Dit laatste artikel is geïnspireerd door de biografie met dezelfde stuwstoffen. [achtergrond: ESA] van Marius Vertregt die in het tweede nummer van 2019 gepubliceerd werd, en waarvan we een Engelstalige versie hebben ingediend voor het IAC 2020 in Dubai. Dit artikel is ook daadwerkelijk geselecteerd voor presentatie op de confe- rentie, maar door de onzekerheden rond het Coronavirus is de conferentie helaas een jaar uitgesteld. Ook andere artikelen uit Ruimtevaart worden in vertaalde vorm overgenomen door Engelstalige media. Zo verscheen het artikel van Henk Smid over Iraanse ruimtevaart uit het eerste nummer van dit jaar zelfs in de bekende online publicatie The Space Review.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle
    Order Code RL33568 The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Updated November 9, 2007 Carl E. Behrens Specialist in Energy Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Summary The International Space Station (ISS) program began in 1993, with Russia joining the United States, Europe, Japan, and Canada. Crews have occupied ISS on a 4-6 month rotating basis since November 2000. The U.S. Space Shuttle, which first flew in April 1981, has been the major vehicle taking crews and cargo back and forth to ISS, but the shuttle system has encountered difficulties since the Columbia disaster in 2003. Russian Soyuz spacecraft are also used to take crews to and from ISS, and Russian Progress spacecraft deliver cargo, but cannot return anything to Earth, since they are not designed to survive reentry into the Earth’s atmosphere. A Soyuz is always attached to the station as a lifeboat in case of an emergency. President Bush, prompted in part by the Columbia tragedy, made a major space policy address on January 14, 2004, directing NASA to focus its activities on returning humans to the Moon and someday sending them to Mars. Included in this “Vision for Space Exploration” is a plan to retire the space shuttle in 2010. The President said the United States would fulfill its commitments to its space station partners, but the details of how to accomplish that without the shuttle were not announced. The shuttle Discovery was launched on July 4, 2006, and returned safely to Earth on July 17.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Vision for Space Exploration
    Constellation The New Vision for Space Exploration Dale Thomas NASA Constellation Program October 2008 The Constellation Program was born from the Constellation’sNASA Authorization Beginnings Act of 2005 which stated…. The Administrator shall establish a program to develop a sustained human presence on the moon, including a robust precursor program to promote exploration, science, commerce and U.S. preeminence in space, and as a stepping stone to future exploration of Mars and other destinations. CONSTELLATION PROJECTS Initial Capability Lunar Capability Orion Altair Ares I Ares V Mission Operations EVA Ground Operations Lunar Surface EVA EXPLORATION ROADMAP 0506 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 LunarLunar OutpostOutpost BuildupBuildup ExplorationExploration andand ScienceScience LunarLunar RoboticsRobotics MissionsMissions CommercialCommercial OrbitalOrbital Transportation ServicesServices forfor ISSISS AresAres II andand OrionOrion DevelopmentDevelopment AltairAltair Lunar LanderLander Development AresAres VV and EarthEarth DepartureDeparture Stage SurfaceSurface SystemsSystems DevelopmentDevelopment ORION: NEXT GENERATION PILOTED SPACECRAFT Human access to Low Earth Orbit … … to the Moon and Mars ORION PROJECT: CREW EXPLORATION VEHICLE Orion will support both space station and moon missions Launch Abort System Orion will support both space stationDesigned and moonto operate missions for up to 210 days in Earth or lunar Designedorbit to operate for up to 210 days in Earth or lunar orbit Designed for lunar
    [Show full text]
  • Dual Thrust Axis Lander (DTAL) Lands Horizontally
    Robust Lunar Exploration Using an Efficient Lunar Lander Derived from Existing Upper Stages AIAA 2009-6566 Bernard F. Kutter 1, Frank Zegler 2, Jon Barr 3, Tim Bulk 4, Brian Pitchford 5 United Launch Alliance Denver, CO Future large scale lunar exploration is impeded by the high cost of accessing the lunar surface. This cost is composed of terrestrial launch costs and the cost of developing and operating efficient lunar landers capable of delivering crew and large payloads to the lunar surface. Developing lunar landers from a platform based upon an operational upper stage minimizes development and recurring costs while increasing crew safety and reliability. The Dual Thrust Axis Lander (DTAL) lands horizontally. It uses an RL10 engine to accomplish the descent deceleration to just above the lunar surface. Final landing is accomplished using thrusters mounted along the DTAL body. This configuration places the crew and payloads safely and conveniently close to the lunar surface. This paper describes DTAL and its benefits in supporting a robust lunar exploration program. Initial DTAL-enabled large robotic missions allow NASA to return to the moon quickly and demonstrate hardware to be used by crews that follow. This same mission design supports placement of large lunar base elements (habitats, power plants, rovers, excavation equipment, etc). As the uncrewed missions are completed, and the system matures, astronauts will then use the same, now proven system to access the lunar surface. The reliable DTAL propulsion stage provides the flexibility to visit destinations other than the moon. DTAL’s mass and thermal efficient design provides the capability to visit NEO’s or possibly even Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive
    CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY HAER FL-8-B BUILDING AE HAER FL-8-B (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Hanger AE) Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING AE (Hangar AE) HAER NO. FL-8-B Location: Hangar Road, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Industrial Area, Brevard County, Florida. USGS Cape Canaveral, Florida, Quadrangle. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: E 540610 N 3151547, Zone 17, NAD 1983. Date of Construction: 1959 Present Owner: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Present Use: Home to NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) and the Launch Vehicle Data Center (LVDC). The LVDC allows engineers to monitor telemetry data during unmanned rocket launches. Significance: Missile Assembly Building AE, commonly called Hangar AE, is nationally significant as the telemetry station for NASA KSC’s unmanned Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) program. Since 1961, the building has been the principal facility for monitoring telemetry communications data during ELV launches and until 1995 it processed scientifically significant ELV satellite payloads. Still in operation, Hangar AE is essential to the continuing mission and success of NASA’s unmanned rocket launch program at KSC. It is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A in the area of Space Exploration as Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) original Mission Control Center for its program of unmanned launch missions and under Criterion C as a contributing resource in the CCAFS Industrial Area Historic District.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Earth Return Vehicle (MERV) Propulsion Options
    Mars Earth Return Vehicle (MERV) Propulsion Options Steven R. Oleson,1 Melissa L. McGuire,2 Laura Burke,3 James Fincannon,4 Joe Warner,5 Glenn Williams,6 and Thomas Parkey7 NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Tony Colozza,8 Jim Fittje,9 Mike Martini,10 and Tom Packard11 Analex Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Joseph Hemminger12 N&R Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio 44135 John Gyekenyesi13 ASRC Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio 44135 The COMPASS Team was tasked with the design of a Mars Sample Return Vehicle. The current Mars sample return mission is a joint National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and European Space Agency (ESA) mission, with ESA contributing the launch vehicle for the Mars Sample Return Vehicle. The COMPASS Team ran a series of design trades for this Mars sample return vehicle. Four design options were investigated: Chemical Return /solar electric propulsion (SEP) stage outbound, all-SEP, all chemical and chemical with aerobraking. The all-SEP and Chemical with aerobraking were deemed the best choices for comparison. SEP can eliminate both the Earth flyby and the aerobraking maneuver (both considered high risk by the Mars Sample Return Project) required by the chemical propulsion option but also require long low thrust spiral times. However this is offset somewhat by the chemical/aerobrake missions use of an Earth flyby and aerobraking which also take many months. Cost and risk analyses are used to further differentiate the all-SEP and Chemical/Aerobrake options. 1COMPASS Lead, DSB0, 21000 Brookpark Road, and AIAA Senior Member. 2COMPASS Integration Lead, DSB0, 21000 Brookpark Road, non-member. 3Mission Designer, DSB0, 21000 Brookpark Road, and Non-Member.
    [Show full text]
  • Launch Vehicle Control Center Architectures
    Launch Vehicle Control Center Architectures Michael D. Watson1, Amy Epps2, and Van Woodruff3 NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 Michael Jacob Vachon4 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058 Julio Monreal5 European Space Agency, Launchers Directorate, Paris, France Marl Levesque6 United Launch Alliance, Vandenberg AFB and Randall Williams7 and Tom McLaughlin8 Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA 90245 Launch vehicles within the international community vary greatly in their configuration and processing. Each launch site has a unique processing flow based on the specific launch vehicle configuration. Launch and flight operations are managed through a set of control centers associated with each launch site. Each launch site has a control center for launch operations; however flight operations support varies from being co-located with the launch site to being shared with the space vehicle control center. There is also a nuance of some having an engineering support center which may be co-located with either the launch or flight control center, or in a separate geographical location altogether. A survey of control center architectures is presented for various launch vehicles including the NASA Space Launch System (SLS), United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V and Delta IV, and the European Space Agency (ESA) Ariane 5. Each of these control center architectures shares some similarities in basic structure while differences in functional distribution also exist. The driving functions which lead to these factors are considered and a model of control center architectures is proposed which supports these commonalities and variations. I. INTRODUCTION Launch vehicles in both Europe and the United States have been operating successfully for several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Nasa's Exploration
    A REVIEW OF NASA’S EXPLORATION PROGRAM IN TRANSITION: ISSUES FOR CONGRESS AND INDUSTRY HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 30, 2011 Serial No. 112–8 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 65–305PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HON. RALPH M. HALL, Texas, Chair F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas Wisconsin JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California ZOE LOFGREN, California ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland DAVID WU, Oregon FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma BRAD MILLER, North Carolina JUDY BIGGERT, Illinois DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois W. TODD AKIN, Missouri GABRIELLE GIFFORDS, Arizona RANDY NEUGEBAUER, Texas DONNA F. EDWARDS, Maryland MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas MARCIA L. FUDGE, Ohio PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia BEN R. LUJA´ N, New Mexico SANDY ADAMS, Florida PAUL D. TONKO, New York BENJAMIN QUAYLE, Arizona JERRY MCNERNEY, California CHARLES J. ‘‘CHUCK’’ FLEISCHMANN, JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland Tennessee TERRI A. SEWELL, Alabama E. SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi HANSEN CLARKE, Michigan MO BROOKS, Alabama ANDY HARRIS, Maryland RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois CHIP CRAVAACK, Minnesota LARRY BUCSHON, Indiana DAN BENISHEK, Michigan VACANCY SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS HON.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENTIFIC EXPLORATION of NEAR-EARTH OBJECTS VIA the CREW EXPLORATION VEHICLE. PA Abell1,* , DJ Korsmeyer2, RR Landis3
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXVIII (2007) 2292.pdf SCIENTIFIC EXPLORATION OF NEAR-EARTH OBJECTS VIA THE CREW EXPLORATION 1,* 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEHICLE. P. A. Abell , D. J. Korsmeyer , R. R. Landis , E. Lu , D. Adamo , T. Jones , L. Lemke , A. Gonza- les7, B. Gershman8, D. Morrison7, T. Sweetser8 and L. Johnson9, 1Planetary Astronomy Group, Astromaterials Re- search and Exploration Science, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058, [email protected]. 2Intelligent Systems Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035. 3Mission Operations, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058. 4Astronaut Office, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058. 5Houston, TX 77058. 6Oakton, VA 20153. 7NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035. 8Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91109. 9NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546.*NASA Postdoctoral Fellow. Introduction: The concept of a crewed mission to etc. Such missions to NEOs are vital from a scientific a Near-Earth Object (NEO) has been analyzed in depth perspective for understanding the evolution and ther- in 1989 as part of the Space Exploration Initiative [1]. mal histories of these bodies during the formation of Since that time two other studies have investigated the the early solar system, and to identify potential source possibility of sending similar missions to NEOs [2,3]. regions from which these NEOs originated. A more recent study has been sponsored by the Ad- NEO exploration missions will also have practical vanced Programs Office within NASA’s Constellation applications such as resource utilization and planetary Program. This study team has representatives from defense; two issues that will be relevant in the not-too- across NASA and is currently examining the feasibility distant future as humanity begins to explore, under- of sending a Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) to a stand, and utilize the solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Space
    EXPLORING SPACE: Opening New Frontiers Past, Present, and Future Space Launch Activities at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and NASA’s John F. Kennedy Space Center EXPLORING SPACE: OPENING NEW FRONTIERS Dr. Al Koller COPYRIGHT © 2016, A. KOLLER, JR. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced without the written consent of the copyright holder Library of Congress Control Number: 2016917577 ISBN: 978-0-9668570-1-6 e3 Company Titusville, Florida http://www.e3company.com 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreword …………………………………………………………………………2 Dedications …………………………………………………………………...…3 A Place of Canes and Reeds……………………………………………….…4 Cape Canaveral and The Eastern Range………………………………...…7 Early Missile Launches ...……………………………………………….....9-17 Explorer 1 – First Satellite …………………….……………………………...18 First Seven Astronauts ………………………………………………….……20 Mercury Program …………………………………………………….……23-27 Gemini Program ……………………………………………..….…………….28 Air Force Titan Program …………………………………………………..29-30 Apollo Program …………………………………………………………....31-35 Skylab Program ……………………………………………………………….35 Space Shuttle Program …………………………………………………..36-40 Evolved Expendable Launch Program ……………………………………..41 Constellation Program ………………………………………………………..42 International Space Station ………………………………...………………..42 Cape Canaveral Spaceport Today………………………..…………………43 ULA – Atlas V, Delta IV ………………………………………………………44 Boeing X-37B …………………………………………………………………45 SpaceX Falcon 1, Falcon 9, Dragon Capsule .………….........................46 Boeing CST-100 Starliner …………………………………………………...47 Sierra
    [Show full text]
  • N AS a Facts
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s Launch Services Program he Launch Services Program (LSP) manufacturing, launch operations and rockets for launching Earth-orbit and Twas established at Kennedy Space countdown management, and providing interplanetary missions. Center for NASA’s acquisition and added quality and mission assurance in In September 2010, NASA’s Launch program management of expendable lieu of the requirement for the launch Services (NLS) contract was extended launch vehicle (ELV) missions. A skillful service provider to obtain a commercial by the agency for 10 years, through NASA/contractor team is in place to launch license. 2020, with the award of four indefinite meet the mission of the Launch Ser- Primary launch sites are Cape Canav- delivery/indefinite quantity contracts. The vices Program, which exists to provide eral Air Force Station (CCAFS) in Florida, expendable launch vehicles that NASA leadership, expertise and cost-effective and Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB) has available for its science, Earth-orbit services in the commercial arena to in California. and interplanetary missions are United satisfy agencywide space transporta- Other launch locations are NASA’s Launch Alliance’s (ULA) Atlas V and tion requirements and maximize the Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia, the Delta II, Space X’s Falcon 1 and 9, opportunity for mission success. Kwajalein Atoll in the South Pacific’s Orbital Sciences Corp.’s Pegasus and facts The principal objectives of the LSP Republic of the Marshall Islands, and Taurus XL, and Lockheed Martin Space are to provide safe, reliable, cost-effec- Kodiak Island in Alaska. Systems Co.’s Athena I and II.
    [Show full text]