Analysis of the DNA-Binding and Activation Properties of the Human Transcription Factor AP-2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 5, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Analysis of the DNA-binding and activation properties of the human transcription factor AP-2 Trevor Williams ~ and Robert Tjian Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720 USA The mammalian transcription factor AP-2 is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein expressed in neural crest lineages and regulated by retinoic acid. Here we report a structure/function analysis of the DNA-binding and transcription activation properties of the AP-2 protein. DNA contact studies indicate that AP-2 binds as a dimer to a palindromic recognition sequence. Furthermore, cross-linking and immunoprecipitation data illustrate that AP-2 exists as a dimer even in the absence of DNA. Examination of cDNA mutants reveals that the sequences responsible for DNA binding are located in the carboxy-terminal half of the protein. In addition, a domain mediating dimerization forms an integral component of this DNA-binding structure. Expression of AP-2 in mammalian cells demonstrates that transcriptional activation requires an additional amino-terminal domain that contains an unusually high concentration of proline residues. This proline-rich activation domain also functions when attached to the heterologous DNA-binding region of the GAL4 protein. This study reveals that although AP-2 shares an underlying modular organization with other transcription factors, the regions of AP-2 involved in transcriptional activation and DNA binding/dimerization have novel sequence characteristics. [Key Words: Enhancer factor~ DNA binding~ dimerization; mammalian expression~ proline-rich activator~ palindromic binding site] Received November 15, 19901 revised version accepted January 22, 1991. Sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins form a vital post-translationally {Mitchell et al. 1987). The AP-2 pro- link between cis-regulatory DNA elements, present in tein binds to a GC-rich recognition sequence present in promoter and enhancer sequences, and the general tran- the cis-regulatory regions of several viral and cellular scription machinery. Modulation of the concentration genes, including the enhancers of SV40, HTLV-1, human and activity of these proteins provides a fundamental metallothionein IIa, and mouse major histocompatibil- mechanism for regulating gene expression. Alterations ity complex (MHC} H-2K b (Imagawa et al. 1987~ Mitchell in the pattern of expression of DNA-binding transcrip- et al. 1987; Nyborg and Dynan 1990}. In addition, AP-2 tion factors can lead to new programs of gene transcrip- can stimulate transcription in a binding site-dependent tion during development. The modification of the activ- manner both in vivo and in vitro {Mitchell et al. 1987~ ity of a pre-existing transcription factor represents one of Williams et al. 1988). Interestingly, the expression of AP- the fastest methods for a cell to alter its pattern of gene 2 mRNA and protein is stimulated by retinoic acid-in- expression in response to extracellular stimuli. Further- duced differentiation of human NT2 teratocarcinoma more, aberrant transcription factor expression can be as- cells {Williams et al. 1988~ Ltischer et al. 1989}. Further- sociated with oncogenesis. The delineation of the do- more, AP-2 is expressed in a cell-type-specific manner~ mains responsible for DNA-binding and transcriptional AP-2 is absent in the human hepatoma cell line HepG2 activation provides important clues toward understand- but present in human HeLa fibroblast cells (Williams et ing how these factors influence gene expression (Ptashne al. 1988}. More recent data also show that AP-2 mRNA 1988~ Mitchell and Tjian 1989). levels are regulated both temporally and spatially during The mammalian enhancer-binding protein AP-2 pre- mouse embryogenesis (Mitchell et al. 1991}. Intriguing- sents an attractive system to study the regulation of ly, the highest levels of expression appear to correspond transcription factor activity. This protein is controlled at to early neural crest cells and suggest that AP-2 plays a the level of its own gene expression (Williams et al. role in their subsequent differentiation and develop- 1988~ Lfischer et al. 1989) and may also be regulated ment. The activity of the AP-2 protein also appears to be 1Corresponding author. controlled post-translationally by both positive and neg- 670 GENES & DEVELOPMENT 5:670-682 © 1991 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory ISSN 0890-9369/91 $3.00 Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 5, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Structure/function analysis of AP-2 ative regulatory mechanisms. Several studies suggest are summarized in Figure 1A. These studies reveal the that AP-2 is displaced from its recognition site by com- occurrence of a consensus sequence, 5'-GN4GGG-3', petition from adjacent DNA-binding proteins (Isra61 et present on one strand of both the SV40 and hMtIIa-bind- al. 1989; Mercurio and Karin 1989; Courtois et al. 1990). ing sites. Furthermore, a slightly degenerate copy of this The DNA-binding activity of AP-2 can also be blocked sequence also occurs on the two complementary strands. by the SV40 large T antigen oncogene product (Mitchell Thus, the AP-2-binding site appears to contain a dyad et al. 1987). In contrast, the ability of AP-2 to activate repeat. Methylation of the guanine present at the center gene expression is stimulated by the hepatitis B virus X of the dyad repeat does not affect AP-2 DNA binding. In protein (Seto et al. 1990). The AP-2 DNA recognition contrast, methylation of the flanking guanines present in sequence also seems to act as both a TPA- and cAMP- the 5'-GN4GGG-3' sequence reduces AP-2 binding to inducible element (Imagawa et al. 1987; Roesler et al. these sites. 1988). To determine the contribution of all the individual The examination of AP-2 activity has been facilitated bases within and around the binding sites we also per- by the recent cloning of a human cDNA encoding the formed missing contact probing assays. This procedure is entire AP-2 open reading frame (Williams et al. 1988). used to determine how the removal of a particular base Expression of the full-length clone in Escherichia coli from the recognition site affects DNA binding. The ex- generated a protein that was indistinguishable from the perimental protocol was similar to methylation interfer- endogenous HeLa factor in its ability to bind DNA and ence except that the starting DNA template was par- activate transcription. Here, we report the analysis of the tially depurinated or depyrimidinated. Representative re- DNA-binding and transcriptional activation properties sults obtained from this analysis are shown in Figure 1B, of the AP-2 protein using a series of cDNA mutants. This and the data are summarized schematically in Figure 1C. analysis reveals that AP-2 has a modular organization The data indicate that many bases within both the SV40 with separate domains involved in transcriptional acti- and hMtIIa sequences are needed to generate a functional vation and DNA binding/dimerization. The information AP-2 binding site. In addition, missing contact probing of obtained should enable us to dissect the mechanism of the SV40 AP-2-site illustrates that flanking DNA se- AP-2 action and understand how it may be regulated. quences may also be important in the generation of a functional binding site. Interestingly, however, the re- moval of symmetrically located cytosine bases within Results the binding site does not affect AP-2 DNA binding (SV40 base pairs 233 and 237; hMtIIa base pairs -177 and The AP-2 recognition sequence contains a dyad repeat -173). Similarly, the cytosine present at the center of The AP-2 protein must perform a minimum of two func- dyad symmetry is not important for protein/DNA con- tions to act as a sequence-specific DNA-binding tran- tact. Molecular modeling indicates that these three cy- scription factor. First, AP-2 must be able to recognize tosine bases can all be aligned on one face of the DNA and bind to a specific DNA sequence; second, the protein helix and suggests that AP-2 is not contacting this region must recruit the general transcription machinery to in- of the DNA (Fig. 1D). It is also interesting to note that crease the rate of initiation. To analyze the former pro- the missing contact probing and methylation interfer- cess we have examined which components of the AP-2 ence procedures measure different aspects of DNA bind- recognition sequence are important for specific protein/ ing, as AP-2 can bind to the recognition sequence when DNA contact. Previously, DNase I footprinting experi- the guanine at the center of dyad symmetry is methyl- ments have shown that AP-2 binds to a GC-rich se- ated but not when it is removed. Taken together, the quence that is present in a variety of promoter and en- results show that the SV40 and hMtIIa sites share several hancer elements associated with both viral and cellular common sequence features. Moreover, the data allow genes (Imagawa et al. 1987; Mitchell et al. 1987). How- the identification of a palindromic sequence, 5'-GCCN3- ever, DNase I footprinting does not generate information GGC-3', which appears to form the core recognition el- concerning the contribution of individual nucleotides ement for the AP-2-binding site. within the DNA-binding site. Therefore, to obtain a more detailed understanding of AP-2 DNA binding, we The carboxy-terminal region of the AP-2 protein performed a series of methylation interference assays us- mediates DNA binding ing the AP-2 sites present in the SV40 enhancer and the human metallothionein IIa distal basal level element The determination of which nucleotides in the recogni- (hMtIIa BLE). Methylation interference assesses the tion site are involved in AP-2 DNA binding represents steric inhibition of DNA binding caused by the presence one aspect in the analysis of protein-DNA interaction.